DOCSLIB.ORG

Minutes of the City-County Council and Special Service District Councils of Indianapolis, Marion County, Indiana Monday, December 9, 2019

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Minutes of the City-County Council and Special Service District Councils of Indianapolis, Marion County, Indiana Monday, December 9, 2019 MINUTES OF THE CITY-COUNTY COUNCIL AND SPECIAL SERVICE DISTRICT COUNCILS OF INDIANAPOLIS, MARION COUNTY, INDIANA MONDAY, DECEMBER 9, 2019 The City-County Council of Indianapolis, Marion County, Indiana and the Indianapolis Police Special Service District Council, Indianapolis Fire Special Service District Council and Indianapolis Solid Waste Collection Special Service District Council convened in regular concurrent sessions in the Council Chamber of the City-County Building at 7:00 p.m. on Monday, December 9, 2019, with Councillor Osili presiding. Councillor Cordi recognized Pastor Tim Lindsey, Lifeline Baptist Church, who led the opening prayer. Councillor Cordi then invited all present to join her in the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. ROLL CALL The President instructed the Clerk to take the roll call and requested members to register their presence on the voting machine. The roll call was as follows: 23 PRESENT: Adamson, Coats, Cordi, Coulter, Evans, Fanning, Graves, Gray, Harris, Holliday, Jackson, Johnson, Lewis, Mascari, McHenry, McQuillen, Mowery, Oliver, Osili, Ray, Robinson, Shreve, Wesseler 2 ABSENT: Scales, Simpson A quorum of twenty-three members being present, the President called the meeting to order. INTRODUCTION OF GUESTS And VISITORS Councillor McQuillen recognized Councillor McHenry’s husband Fred. Councillor Oliver recognized Marion County Clerk Myla Eldridge, Deputy Clerk NaTrina DeBow, and constituent Erin Latchett. Councillor Adamson recognized AFSCME representatives Georgia Cravey and Michael Torres. Councillor McHenry recognized residents of District 6 who showed up this evening to support others being recognized. Councillor Robinson recognized Pike Township elected officials, Senator Greg Taylor and Trustee Annette Johnson. Councillor Harris recognized Mayor of Clermont, Nancy Baxter. OFFICIAL COMMUNICATIONS The President called for the reading of Official Communications. The Clerk read the following: TO ALL MEMBERS OF THE CITY-COUNTY COUNCIL AND POLICE, FIRE AND SOLID WASTE COLLECTION SPECIAL SERVICE DISTRICT COUNCILS OF THE CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS AND MARION COUNTY, INDIANA Ladies And Gentlemen : You are hereby notified the REGULAR MEETINGS of the City-County Council and Police, Fire and Solid Waste Collection Special Service District Councils will be held in the City-County Building, in the Council 5 Journal of the City-County Council Chambers, on Monday, December 9, 2019, at 7:00 p.m., the purpose of such MEETINGS being to conduct any and all business that may properly come before regular meetings of the Councils. Respectfully, s/Vop Osili President, City-County Council November 20, 2019 TO PRESIDENT OSILI AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY-COUNTY COUNCIL AND POLICE, FIRE AND SOLID WASTE COLLECTION SPECIAL SERVICE DISTRICT COUNCILS OF THE CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS AND MARION COUNTY, INDIANA: Ladies and Gentlemen: Pursuant to the laws of the State of Indiana, I caused to be published in the Court & Commercial Record and in the Indianapolis Star on Friday, November 22, 2019 a copy of a Notice of Public Hearing on Proposal Nos. 392, 396, 397, 400, 401, 406-410, 412 and 413, 2019, said hearing to be held on Monday, December 9, 2019, 2019 at 7:00 p.m. in the Public Assembly Room of the City-County Building. Respectfully, s/SaRita Hughes Clerk of the City-County Council November 26, 2019 TO PRESIDENT OSILI AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY-COUNTY COUNCIL AND POLICE, FIRE AND SOLID WASTE COLLECTION SPECIAL SERVICE DISTRICT COUNCILS OF THE CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS AND MARION COUNTY, INDIANA: Ladies and Gentlemen: I have approved with my signature and delivered this day to the Clerk of the City-County Council, SaRita Hughes, the following ordinances: GENERAL ORDINANCE NO. 65, 2019 – amends the Code to comply with IC 36-1-27-4 regarding conflicts of interest in the issuance of building permits, and relocates and recodifies existing text to more logical locations GENERAL RESOLUTION NO. 30, 2019 – approves and ratifies the declaratory resolution of the Metropolitan Development Commission for the Twin Aire Economic Development Area and creates the Twin Aire Allocation Area GENERAL RESOLUTION NO. 31, 2019 – authorizes the Metropolitan Development Commission and Department of Metropolitan Development to execute required documents to implement the application and issue debt obligations in the form of promissory notes from the US Department of Housing and Urban Development in an amount not to exceed $5,000,000 to be used for infrastructure improvements to facilitate redevelopment that may include improved drainage, new sidewalks, new bike and pedestrian infrastructure, and new lighting that will support commercial and residential development in the South Meridian Allocation Area, and approves any appropriations necessary for the repayment of principle and interest incurred by the issuance of such promissory notes GENERAL RESOLUTION NO. 32, 2019 – approves the statement of benefits of CraftMark Bakery, LLC and GPT Exploration Drive Owner, LLC, an applicant for tax abatement for property located in an economic revitalization area GENERAL RESOLUTION NO. 33, 2019 – amends the declaratory resolution and redevelopment plan for the Near Eastside Redevelopment Area to add an area, referred to as the "Sherman Park Allocation Area," within the Near Eastside Redevelopment Area and to adopt a supplement to the plan SPECIAL RESOLUTION NO. 35, 2019 – recognizes the Hope Center for providing hope and relief to victims of sex trafficking SPECIAL RESOLUTION NO. 36, 2019 – honors the IU Health Indy Criterium Bicycle Festival for 10 years of service SPECIAL RESOLUTION NO. 37, 2019 – honors Race and Cultural Relations Leadership Network for 25 years of service SPECIAL RESOLUTION NO. 38, 2019 – recognizes the Indiana Union Construction Industry and their recruitment arm, the Indiana Careers in Construction Association SPECIAL RESOLUTION NO. 39, 2019 – recognizes the O’Neill School of Public and Environmental Affairs at IUPUI and the Indiana University Public Policy Institute 6 December 9, 2019 SPECIAL RESOLUTION NO. 40, 2019 - determines the need for the Marion County Coroner's Office to renew the lease on their property located at 521 West McCarty Street s/Joseph H. Hogsett, Mayor ADOPTION OF THE AGENDA The President proposed the adoption of the agenda as distributed. Without objection, the agenda was adopted. APPROVAL OF THE JOURNAL The President called for additions or corrections to the Journals of November 18, 2019. There being no additions or corrections, the minutes were approved as distributed. PRESENTATION OF PETITIONS, MEMORIALS, SPECIAL RESOLUTIONS, AND COUNCIL RESOLUTIONS PROPOSAL NO. 448, 2019. The proposal, sponsored by Councillor Adamson, recognizes the Indiana Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force. Councillor Adamson stated that representatives were unable to attend this evening and he will re-introduce the proposal to be heard in 2020. He moved, seconded by Councillor McQuillen, to strike. Proposal No. 448, 2019 was stricken by a unanimous voice vote. PROPOSAL NO. 458, 2019. The proposal, sponsored by Councillor McQuillen, honors Central Indiana Wood Workers for their manufacturing of tons of toys and gifts for Central Indiana children. Councillor McQuillen read the proposal and presented representatives with copies of the document and Council pins. Bob Decker, incoming president for CIWW, thanked the Council for the recognition. Councillor McQuillen moved, seconded by Councillor Shreve, for adoption. Proposal No. 458, 2019 was adopted by a unanimous voice vote. Proposal No. 458, 2019 was retitled SPECIAL RESOLUTION NO. 41, 2019, and reads as follows: CITY-COUNTY SPECIAL RESOLUTION NO. 41, 2019 A SPECIAL RESOLUTION honoring Central Indiana Wood Workers for their manufacturing of tons of toys and gifts for Central Indiana children. WHEREAS, Central Indiana Wood Workers is a 501(c)(3) tax exempt organization that was founded in 1948 as the Home Craftsmen Forum. It started with the sole objective to provide members with a presentation of educational programs and demonstration of machines, tools and processes adaptable for use in the home workshop; and WHEREAS, their mission is the education of members and non-members in wood craftsmanship, and contribution to the community. Many amateur and professional men and women have a common interest in fabricating from wood; and WHEREAS, over the years, Central Indiana Wood Workers (CIWW) has grown and become more focused on woodworking and has added the making of wooden toys that are distributed to disadvantaged children as their formal charitable service to the community. Each year, they make over 10,000 toys and 1500 craft kits. These are distributed throughout over 40 social service organizations in time for Christmas; and WHEREAS, Yale Martin, an avid woodworker, joined CIWW in 2014 and currently serves as president. Mr. Martin has been married to his beautiful wife Carol for 48 years and has four children, nine grandchildren and three great-grandchildren; now, therefore: 7 Journal of the City-County Council BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY-COUNTY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS AND OF MARION COUNTY, INDIANA: SECTION 1. The Indianapolis City-County Council recognizes Central Indiana Wood Workers for their manufacturing of toys and gifts for Central Indiana disadvantaged children. SECTION 2. The City-County Council recognizes the hard work, dedication and support of the Central Indiana Wood Workers. SECTION 3. The Mayor is invited to join in this resolution by affixing his signature hereto. SECTION
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Neglected Question of Congressional Oversight of Epa: Quis Custodiet Ipsos Custodes (Who Shall Watch the Watchers Themselves)?
    THE NEGLECTED QUESTION OF CONGRESSIONAL OVERSIGHT OF EPA: QUIS CUSTODIET IPSOS CUSTODES (WHO SHALL WATCH THE WATCHERS THEMSELVES)? RICHARD J. LAZARUS* I INTRODUCTION The United States Environmental Protection Agency ("EPA") and the federal environmental protection laws within its charge have received much attention in the literature during the past twenty years. Commentators have frequently considered the relationship of EPA to the courts, including the advantages and disadvantages of both more and less exacting judicial review of agency decisions.' Scholars have likewise periodically examined the peculiar way in which Congress has drafted the federal environmental protection laws to ensure their achievement of policy goals. 2 These laws have Copyright © 1991 by Law and Contemporary Problems * Associate Professor of Law, Washington University, St. Louis. In my plenary review of EPA's first twenty years, reproduced later in this volume, I describe more fully the collision of institutional forces (including those unleashed by Congress) that have surrounded EPA, why they developed, and how they have affected both EPA and the evolution of federal environmental law. See RichardJ. Lazarus, The Tragedy of Distrust in the Implementation of Federal EnvironmentalLaw, 54 L & Contemp Probs 311 (Autumn 1991). This article explores in greater depth the causes and effects of congressional oversight of EPA, a specific topic for discussion at the Symposium on EPA sponsored by the Duke University and Washington University Schools of Law in November 1990. The article benefitted greatly from the comments I received at the symposium, especially those offered by Joel Aberbach, Don Elliott, Anne Shields, and Steve Shimberg. Kathleen Lindenberger and Cathy Varley provided valuable research assistance.
    [Show full text]
  • A List of the Records That Petitioners Seek Is Attached to the Petition, Filed Concurrently Herewith
    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA IN RE PETITION OF STANLEY KUTLER, ) AMERICAN HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION, ) AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR LEGAL HISTORY, ) Miscellaneous Action No. ORGANIZATION OF AMERICAN HISTORIANS, ) and SOCIETY OF AMERICAN ARCHIVISTS. ) ) MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF PETITION FOR ORDER DIRECTING RELEASE OF TRANSCRIPT OF RICHARD M. NIXON’S GRAND JURY TESTIMONY OF JUNE 23-24, 1975, AND ASSOCIATED MATERIALS OF THE WATERGATE SPECIAL PROSECUTION FORCE Professor Stanley Kutler, the American Historical Association, the American Society for Legal History, the Organization of American Historians, and the Society of American Archivists petition this Court for an order directing the release of President Richard M. Nixon’s thirty-five-year- old grand jury testimony and associated materials of the Watergate Special Prosecution Force.1 On June 23-24, 1975, President Nixon testified before two members of a federal grand jury who had traveled from Washington, DC, to San Clemente, California. The testimony was then presented in Washington, DC, to the full grand jury that had been convened to investigate political espionage, illegal campaign contributions, and other wrongdoing falling under the umbrella term Watergate. Watergate was the defining event of Richard Nixon’s presidency. In the early 1970s, as the Vietnam War raged and the civil rights movement in the United States continued its momentum, the Watergate scandal ignited a crisis of confidence in government leadership and a constitutional crisis that tested the limits of executive power and the mettle of the democratic process. “Watergate” was 1A list of the records that petitioners seek is attached to the Petition, filed concurrently herewith.
    [Show full text]
  • Indianapolis Star
    OWNERSHIP EFFECTS ON CONTENT: A CASE STUDY OF THE INDIANAPOLIS STAR By SHANNON CUSTER MCALEENAN A THESIS PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS IN MASS COMMUNICATION UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2008 1 © 2008 Shannon Custer McAleenan 2 To my mother, Dorothee Custer; my fiancé Nick McGregor; and my former teacher, Nadia Ramoutar, who all nurtured my intellectual curiosity, academic interests, and sense of scholarship, making this milestone possible. Also to my father, John McAleenan—without him I would not be in this field. 3 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I thank the professors who dedicated so much time to ensuring that my thesis and I would succeed and survive. I thank my chair, Johanna Cleary, who oversaw this project from its early days, through to the end. I thank Amy Jo Coffey, who generously guided me through the process. I also thank Ted Spiker, who infinitely improved my writing and kept me laughing. I thank my mother for putting up with my crankiness as I finished this project. I also thank my friends who understood and forgave my absence and unreturned phone calls while I wrote my thesis. Finally, I thank my fiancé, Nick, who helped me stick to a schedule and ensured that yes, I could finish this. 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS page ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ...............................................................................................................4 LIST OF TABLES ...........................................................................................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • Toxic Temptation
    TOXIC TEMPTATION The Revolving Door, Bureaucratic Inertia and the Disappointment of the EPA Superfund Program Eric J. Greenberg THE CENTER FOR PUBLIC INTEGRITY 1910 K Street N.W., Suite 802 Washington, DC 20006 (202) 223-0299 TOXIC TEMPTATION The Revolving Door, Bureaucratic Inertia and the Disappointment of the EPA Superfund Program Eric J. Greenberg THE CENTER FOR PUBLIC INTEGRITY 1910 K Street N.W., Suite 802 Washington, D.C. 20006 (202) 223-0299 "Let the public service be a proud and lively career. And let every man and woman who works in any area of our national government, in any branch, at any level, be able to say with pride and with honor in future years: 'I served the United States government in that hour of our nation's need.'" - John F. Kennedy "To the extent that the public believes that people who move in and out of government are doing so in order to advance their own economic interest as opposed to representing the public interest when they are in government, that's not a good thing for society." -- William D. Ruckelshaus, EPA's first and fifth Administrator, 1991 "I've had it with patriotism: I'm into greed now." - Anne Gorsuch Burford, EPA Administrator, 1981-1983, to Regardie's Magazine, August 1984 The Center for Public Integrity is an independent nonprofit organization that examines public service and ethics-related issues. The Center's Reports combine the substantive study of government with in-depth journalism. The Center is funded by foundations, corporations, labor unions, individuals and revenue from news organizations.
    [Show full text]
  • Ruckelshaus Weighs in on EPA-Bashing
    Ruckelshaus weighs in on EPA-bashing Original Reporting | By James Lardner | Environment, Regulation March 9, 2011 — In 1983, Ronald Reagan needed a symbol of integrity to run the Environmental Pro- tection Administration and put the lid on a scandal involving its Superfund cleanup program. He turned to William Ruckelshaus, who had won the environ- mental movement’s respect as the agency’s first leader from 1970 to 1972, and then, in the “Satur- day night massacre” of October 1973, had resigned as Deputy Attorney General rather than carry out President Richard Nixon’s order to fire Archibald Cox, the special prosecutor who had taken the Wa- tergate cover-up more seriously than he was sup- posed to. Last week, Remapping Debate sought out the 78-year-old Ruckelshaus — who has also worked as an executive or director at various corporations, including Weyerhauser and Browning Ferris Industries — for some historical perspective on environmental policy and the way the EPA and other rule-making agencies are treated by elected officials nowadays. A lifelong Republican, Ruckelshaus endorsed Barack Obama for President in 2008, citing Obama’s campaign commitment to action on climate change as one big reason. Once upon a time the GOP supported environmental protections… Ruckelshaus’s memories of Washington stretch back four decades to a time when, as he recalled, “the Clean Air Act passed the House by 374 to 1; it passed the Senate by 73 to nothing. These were not partisan issues,” he said. “They have become much more partisan since.” He was quick to add that some of Congress’s habits, such as not giving an agency remotely enough funding to accomplish its statutory goals, are longstanding.
    [Show full text]
  • JUNE 10, 2019 Chairman Nadler, Ranking Member Collins, the Last
    STATEMENT OF JOHN W. DEAN U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY HEARINGS: “LESSONS FROM THE MUELLER REPORT: PRESIDENTIAL OBSTRUCTION AND OTHER CRIMES.” JUNE 10, 2019 Chairman Nadler, Ranking Member Collins, the last time I appeared before your committee was July 11, 1974, during the impeachment inquiry of President Richard Nixon. Clearly, I am not here as a fact witness. Rather I accepted the invitation to appear today because I hope I can give a bit of historical context to the Mueller Report. In many ways the Mueller Report is to President Trump what the so-called Watergate “Road Map” (officially titled “Grand Jury Report and Recommendation Concerning Transmission of Evidence to the House of Representatives”) was to President Richard Nixon. Stated a bit differently, Special Counsel Mueller has provided this committee a road map. The Mueller Report, like the Watergate Road Map, conveys findings, with supporting evidence, of potential criminal activity based on the work of federal prosecutors, FBI investigators, and witness testimony before a federal grand jury. The Mueller Report explains – in Vol. II, p. 1 – that one of the reasons the Special Counsel did not make charging decisions relating to obstruction of justice was because he did not want to “potentially preempt [the] constitutional processes for addressing presidential misconduct.” The report then cites at footnote 2: “See U.S. CONST. ART. I § 2, cl. 5; § 3, cl. 6; cf. OLC Op. at 257-258 (discussing relationship between impeachment and criminal prosecution of a sitting President).” Today, you are focusing on Volume II of the report.
    [Show full text]
  • Does the President Have Directive Authority Over Agency Regulatory Decisions?
    Fordham Law Review Volume 79 Issue 6 Article 2 November 2011 Who's In Charge? Does the President Have Directive Authority Over Agency Regulatory Decisions? Robert V. Percival Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/flr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Robert V. Percival, Who's In Charge? Does the President Have Directive Authority Over Agency Regulatory Decisions? , 79 Fordham L. Rev. 2487 (2011). Available at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/flr/vol79/iss6/2 This Symposium is brought to you for free and open access by FLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. It has been accepted for inclusion in Fordham Law Review by an authorized editor of FLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. For more information, please contact [email protected]. WHO’S IN CHARGE? DOES THE PRESIDENT HAVE DIRECTIVE AUTHORITY OVER AGENCY REGULATORY DECISIONS? Robert V. Percival* Most regulatory statutes specify that agency heads rather than the President shall make regulatory decisions .1 Yet for more than four decades every President has established some program to require pre-decisional review and clearance of agency regulatory decisions, usually conducted by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB).2 On January 18, 2011, President Barack Obama joined his seven predecessors in expressly endorsing regulatory review when he signed Executive Order 13,563.3 President Obama’s regulatory review program generally emulates those of his two most recent predecessors, relying on OMB’s Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) to review only the most significant agency rulemaking actions.4 Although this form of presidential oversight of rulemaking is now well established, an important, unresolved question is whether the President has the authority to dictate the substance of regulatory decisions entrusted by statute to agency heads.
    [Show full text]
  • Blocked Titles - Academic and Public Library Markets Factiva
    Blocked Titles - Academic and Public Library Markets Factiva Source Name Source Code Aberdeen American News ABAM Advocate ADVO Akron Beacon Journal AKBJ Alexandria Daily Town Talk ADTT Allentown Morning Call XALL Argus Leader ARGL Asbury Park Press ASPK Asheville Citizen-Times ASHC Baltimore Sun BSUN Battle Creek Enquirer BATL Baxter County Newspapers BAXT Belleville News-Democrat BLND Bellingham Herald XBEL Brandenton Herald BRDH Bucryus Telegraph Forum BTF Burlington Free Press BRFP Centre Daily Times CDPA Charlotte Observer CLTO Chicago Tribune TRIB Chilicothe Gazette CGOH Chronicle-Tribune CHRT Cincinnati Enquirer CINC Clarion-Ledger (Jackson, MS) CLDG Cochocton Tribune CTOH Columbus Ledger-Enquirer CLEN Contra Costa Times CCT Courier-News XCNW Courier-Post CPST Daily Ledger DLIN Daily News Leader DNLE Daily Press DAIL Daily Record DRNJ Daily Times DTMD Daily Times Adviser DTA Daily World DWLA Democrat & Chronicle (Rochester, NY) DMCR Des Moines Register DMRG Detroit Free Press DFP Detroit News DTNS Duluth News-Tribune DNTR El Paso Times ELPS Florida Today FLTY Fort Collins Coloradoan XFTC Fort Wayne News Sentinel FWNS Fort Worth Star-Telegram FWST Grand Forks Herald XGFH Great Falls Tribune GFTR Green Bay Press-Gazette GBPG Greenville News (SC) GNVL Hartford Courant HFCT Harvard Business Review HRB Harvard Management Update HMU Hattiesburg American HATB Herald Times Reporter HTR Home News Tribune HMTR Honolulu Advertiser XHAD Idaho Statesman BSID Iowa City Press-Citizen PCIA Journal & Courier XJOC Journal-News JNWP Kansas City Star
    [Show full text]
  • Stage 3: Congressional Hearings in March 1973, Judge Sirica Sentenced Liddy, Hunt, and Four of the Burglars to 20, 35, and 40 Years in Prison, Respectively
    Student Handout 23A Stage 3: Congressional Hearings In March 1973, Judge Sirica sentenced Liddy, Hunt, and four of the burglars to 20, 35, and 40 years in prison, respectively. McCord admitted just before the sentencing that there was more information to be shared. Thus Sirica delayed sentencing him. Soon thereafter, L. Patrick Gray, the acting director of the FBI, admitted to having destroyed Watergate evidence. He then resigned. In May, North Carolina Senator Sam Ervin, the chairman of the Senate Select Committee on Presidential Activities, con- vened televised hearings on Watergate. Many Americans watched the hearings with great fascination. In June, John Dean, whom Nixon had fired as White House counsel in April, testified before the Senate Select Committee. He revealed that the former attorney general, John Mitchell—who had become Nixon’s 1972 pres- idential campaign manager—had ordered the Watergate break-in. Dean explained that the White House was covering up its involvement. He also testified that the president had authorized payments of hush money to the burglars to keep them quiet. Nixon’s aides vehemently denied this charge. On July 16, White House aide Alexander Butterfield testified. He revealed startling information—that Nixon had had a taping system installed in the White House to automatically record all conversations there. Only a hand- included 350,000 angry telegrams sent to Congress and ful of people had known about the system. Now, the the White House. The president responded by appointing hearing’s key questions—what did the president know, another special Watergate prosecutor, Leon Jaworski, and and when did he know it—could be answered by listening then turning over the subpoenaed tapes.
    [Show full text]
  • The President's Lawyers— Problems
    ALL THE PRESIDENT’S LAWYERS— PROBLEMS AND POTENTIAL SOLUTIONS IN PROSECUTING PRESIDENTIAL CRIMINAL CONDUCT Matthew Hansen* Following the presidential election of 2016, the United States has found itself in a constitutional crisis, the likes of which the Framers could not have anticipated. The evidence currently mounting against President Donald Trump regarding possible Russian collusion has sparked a number of controversies, including the President’s unilateral firing of FBI Director James B. Comey in the middle of a formal investigation into the Trump Administration’s ties to Russia. Despite this potential obstruction of justice, the sole governmental entity with any enumerated constitutional authority to bring punitive action against a sitting president, the legislative branch, has been politically reticent to take any action against President Trump. While Special Counsel Robert Mueller has been tasked with the Russia investigation, there is no precedent in American law that would permit any entity from bringing criminal charges against a sitting president without Congress’s willingness to draft and try articles of impeachment. Further, the current laws governing a special counsel’s abilities severely limit any vital impact he or she may have in the face of a politically biased Congress. This Note proposes the resurrection of Title VI of the Ethics in Government Act of 1978, which gave special counsel broader authority while conducting investigations into potential executive- branch abuse of power. Additionally, this Note further advocates for an expanded role for the judicial branch in investigating and, if necessary, compelling congressional action through judicial review in situations where an executive- branch abuse of power remains congressionally unaddressed despite special- counsel recommendations.
    [Show full text]
  • The Guardian: EPA's Formative Years, 1970- 1973
    The Guardian: EPA's Formative Years, 1970- 1973 EPA 202-K-93-002 September 1993 by Dennis C. Williams Table of Contents Introduction Building an Agency Drawing the Line Taking to the Air Pesticides and Public Health Changing Captains References Introduction Few federal agencies evoke as much emotion in the average American as the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Either directly or indirectly, the agency's operations confront the average person in intimate ways. Everyone wants breathable air, drinkable water, and land free from harmful pollutants on which to live. EPA's actions in pursuit of those goals have altered the nation's social, political, and economic course. Moreover, in attempting over the past quarter century to make a cleaner environment a reality, EPA has found itself regulating the personal conduct of individual citizens. Often, the turbulent relationship between the agency and its diverse constituencies has interfered with these tasks. At various times during its history, the agency has roused business and industry, farmers, environmentalists, Congress, the White House, and the general public to ire. EPA has attempted to regulate the environment by building acceptable compromises among its constituents. Since compromises by their very nature are seldom satisfactory to everyone, EPA's constituents have given the agency mixed evaluations. Still, the agency has continued to follow many of the pollution control strategies set forth by its first administrator, William D. Ruckelshaus. Understanding the course set by Ruckelshaus and his staff illuminates not only EPA's past, but clarifies the agency's place in American society today. Ruckelshaus's original mission appeared simple enough: clean up America.
    [Show full text]
  • About a Quarter of Large U.S. Newspapers Laid Off Staff in 2018
    EMBARGOED COPY – NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION OR PUBLICATION UNTIL 9:30 A.M. EDT, AUG. 1, 2019 About a quarter of large U.S. newspapers laid off staff in 2018 BY ELIZABETH GRIECO Layoffs continue to pummel staff at U.S. newspapers. Roughly a quarter of papers with an average Sunday circulation of 50,000 or more experienced layoffs in 2018, according to a new Pew Research Center analysis. The layoffs come on top of the roughly one-third of papers in the same circulation range that experienced layoffs in 2017. What’s more, the number of jobs typically cut by newspapers in 2018 tended to be higher than in the year before. Mid-market newspapers were the most likely to suffer layoffs in 2018 – unlike in 2017, when the largest papers most frequently saw cutbacks. Meanwhile, digital-native news outlets also faced continued layoffs: In 2018, 14% of the highest- traffic digital-native news outlets went through layoffs, down slightly from one-in-five in 2017. The following analysis examines layoffs at large newspapers and digital-native news outlets during the full 2017 and 2018 calendar years. An earlier analysis by the Center looked at layoffs at news organizations covering the period from January 2017 to April 2018. Roughly a third of newspapers that had layoffs in 2018 saw multiple rounds About one-in-four U.S. newspapers with an average Sunday circulation of 50,000 or higher (27%) experienced one or more publicly reported layoffs in 2018, according to the study, which examined EMBARGOED COPY – NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION OR PUBLICATION UNTIL 9:30 A.M.
    [Show full text]