DOCSLIB.ORG

OP JINDAL SCHOOL, SAVITRI NAGAR Work Sheet

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
OP JINDAL SCHOOL, SAVITRI NAGAR Work Sheet O. P. JINDAL SCHOOL, SAVITRI NAGAR Work Sheet - 6 (2020 – 2021) Class: X Subject: Social Science (History) Date: 16/09/2020 Name: ___________________________ Class / Section: ____________ ______________________________________________________________________________ NOTES Chapter – 05 The Age of Industrialisation Proto Industrialisation 1.The period of industrialization before the first factories came up in Europe is termed as proto-industrialization. 2. This period was marked by merchants from towns getting products made in villages. Reasons for focus of merchants on villages: 1.There was powerful trade and craft guilds in urban areas. 2. These associations controlled competition and prices and prevented entry of a new player in the market. 3. Because of them, it was difficult for new merchants to set business in towns. Features of proto-industrialization in Britain: 1.The merchants supplied money to the peasants in the countryside. 2. They motivated them to produce products for an international market. 3. Land was becoming scarce in villages. 4. Small plots of land were not enough to meet the need of a growing population. 5. Peasants were looking for some additional sources of income. The Coming Up Of Factory: 1.The earliest factories in England came up in the 1730s . 2. By late 18th century, there were numerous factories dotting the landscape of England. 3. In 1760 Britain was importing 2.5 million pounds of raw cotton. This quantity increased to 22 million pounds by 1787. Benefits of factories: 1.The factories increased efficiency of workers. Because of new machines a worker could produce better products in much bigger quantities. 2. Cotton textiles were the main area in which industrialization happened. 3. Managing and supervising the labour was much easier in factories than it was in the countryside. The pace of Industrial Change: 1.Cotton and metals were the most dynamic industries in Britain. During the first phase of industrialization (unto 1840s), cotton was the leading sector. 2. The iron and steel industries grew rapidly with the expansion of railways. 3. The railways expanded in England from the 1840s and in the colonies from 1860s. 4. By 1873, the export of iron and steel from Britain was valued at about 77 million pounds. 5. This was double the value of cotton export. Effects: 1. At the end of the nineteenth century, less than 20% of total workforce was employed in technologically advanced industrial sectors. This shows that the traditional industry could not be displaced by the new industries. 2. The cotton or metal industries could not set the change of pace in the traditional industries. But the traditional industries experienced many changes which were brought by small and apparently ordinary innovations. Food processing, building, pottery, glasswork, tanning, furniture making and production of implements were such industries. 3. The new technology took a long time to spread across the industrial landscape. High cost of machines and costly repair scared the merchants and industrialists. 4. The new machines were not as effective as claimed by their inventors and manufacturers. 5. Historians acknowledge the fact that the typical worker in the mid-nineteenth century was not a machine operator but the traditional craftsperson and labourer. Why did some industrialists in nineteenth-century Europe prefer hand labour over machines? 1 .During this period, there was no shortage of human labour. 2. Because of good supply of workers, there was no problem of labour shortage or high wages. 3. As a result, the merchants and industrialists preferred to manage with human labour rather than investing in costly machines. 4. Machine-made goods were standardized and could not match the high quality finish of hand-made goods. 5. The people from the upper classes preferred things produced by hand. The situation was different in nineteenth century America. There was shortage of labour in America and hence mechanization was the only way out in that part of the world. Life of Workers 1.There was large scale migration from countryside to cities in search of jobs. 2. Finding a job depended on existing network of friendship and kin relations. 3. People without existing social connections in the cities found it difficult to find a job. 4. Many people had to wait for long periods before they could get a job. Such people often had to spend nights on bridges or in night shelters. 5. Some private individuals set up Night Refuges. The Poor Law authorities maintained Casual Wards for such people. Problems or difficulties faced by workers: 1. Many jobs were seasonal in nature. 2. Once a busy season was over, the poor were once again on the streets. 3. While some people returned to the countryside, many stayed back to look for some odd jobs.. 4.The period of employment was also critical in determining the quality of life of a worker. 5. During the best of the times till the mid-nineteenth century, about 10% of urban population was extremely poor. During the periods of economic slump, the unemployment increased anything between 35 and 75%. Why Workers often turned hostile to new technology ? 1 .Workers often turned hostile to new technology because of fear of unemployment. 2. For example; when Spinning Jenny was introduced, women began to attack the new machines because they survived on hand spinning. 3. After the 1840s, construction activity increased in the cities. 4. This opened greater employment opportunities. 5. The number of workers in the transport industries doubled in the 1840s, and doubled again in the subsequent 30 years. The Age of Indian Textiles : 1.The East India Company had consolidated its business by the mid-eighteenth century. 2. The earlier centres of trade; like Surat and Hooghly; declined during this period. 3. The new centres; like Calcutta and Bombay emerged. Once the East India Company established political power, it began to assert its monopoly right to trade. How did the East India Company procure regular supplies of cotton and silk textiles from Indian weavers? 1. The Company tried to eliminate the existing traders and brokers who were connected with the cloth trade. 2. It tried to establish a more direct control on the weavers. 3. A paid servant; called Gomastha was appointed to supervise weavers, collect supplies, and examine the quality of cloth. 4. The Company prevented weavers from dealing with other buyers. 5. This was done through the system of advances. Under this system, the weavers were given loans to purchase raw materials. Once a weaver took the advance, he could not sell his produce to any other trader. New system of advances created many problems for the weavers: 1.The new system of advances created many problems for the weavers. 2. Earlier, they used to grow some crops on their land which took care of their family needs. 3. Now, they had not time for cultivation and they had to lease out their land. Relationship between Gomastha and weavers: 1. Unlike the traditional merchants, the Gomastha was an outsider who had no social links with the villages. 2. He used to visit with sepoys and peons and punished weavers who could not meet the deadline. 3. The Gomastha behaved arrogantly. There were reports of clashes between weavers and Gomastha in many villages. System of advances resulted: 1. The system of advances resulted in many weavers falling in debt trap. 2. In many places in Carnatic and Bengal, weavers deserted villages and migrated to other villages to set up looms. 3. Many weavers began to refuse loans, closed down their workshops and took to farming. Manchester comes to India: 1. By the beginning of the nineteenth century; a long decline of textiles exports from India initiated. 2. Because of pressure from the British manufacturers, the government imposed import duties so that the goods manufactured in Britain could sell in England. 3. They also pressurized the East India Company to sell British manufactured goods in Indian markets. At the end of the eighteenth century, there had been negligible import of cotton piece-goods in India. 4. The machine-made cotton was cheaper than hand-made cotton piece-goods in India. The weavers thus lost a huge market share to imports from Britain. By 1850s, most of the cotton producing centres in India faced a steep decline. 5. The Civil War broke out in the US in 1860s. Due to that, the cotton supply from the US to Britain was cut off. Britain turned began to source cotton from India. This led to a huge shortage of raw cotton for weavers in India. By the end of the nineteenth century cotton factories began to come up in India as well. This was the final blow for traditional cotton textiles industry in India. Factories Come Up: 1. The first cotton mill in Bombay came up in 1854 and it went into production two years later. 2. By 1862 four mills were in operation. 3. Jute mills also came up in Bengal around the same time. 4. The Elgin Mill was started in Kanpur in the 1860s. 5. In Ahmadabad, the first cotton mill was set up in the same period. By 1874, the first cotton mill of Madras began production. The Early Entrepreneurs: 1.The history of many business groups goes back to trade with China. From the late eighteenth century, the British in India began to export opium to China and import tea from there. 2. Many Indians took active participation in this trade by providing finance, procuring supplies and shipping consignments. Once these businessmen earned enough, they dreamt of developing industrial enterprises in India. 3. Dwarknanath Tagore was among the pioneers to begin industries in the 1830s and 1840s. Tagore’s enterprise sank during the business crises of the 1840s.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Work in and Beyond the Second Machine Age: the Politics of Production and Digital Technologies
    This is a repository copy of Work in and beyond the Second Machine Age: the politics of production and digital technologies. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/97294/ Version: Accepted Version Article: Spencer, D (2017) Work in and beyond the Second Machine Age: the politics of production and digital technologies. Work, Employment and Society, 31 (1). pp. 142-152. ISSN 0950-0170 https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017016645716 (c) 2016, The Author. This is an author produced version of a paper published in Work, Employment and Society. Uploaded in accordance with the publisher's self-archiving policy. Reuse Unless indicated otherwise, fulltext items are protected by copyright with all rights reserved. The copyright exception in section 29 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 allows the making of a single copy solely for the purpose of non-commercial research or private study within the limits of fair dealing. The publisher or other rights-holder may allow further reproduction and re-use of this version - refer to the White Rose Research Online record for this item. Where records identify the publisher as the copyright holder, users can verify any specific terms of use on the publisher’s website. Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ Work in and beyond the Second Machine Age: the politics of production and digital technologies David Spencer University of Leeds Forthcoming in Work, Employment, and Society Abstract Erik Brynjolfsson and Andrew McAfee, in their widely read and politically impactful book, The Second Machine Age (2014), highlight the costs and benefits of digital technologies for the volume and quality of work and identify reforms designed to ensure that digital technologies deliver net advantages to workers and society more generally.
    [Show full text]
  • Machine-Age Exposition, Catalogue
    MAY MAY NEW YORK 119 WEST 57th _ t Special Design No. 257 HE hi^h quality and finish of Cast Ferro- Tcraft, as compared with other metals, and the ability of our craftsmen to execute the most exacting requirements, have won wide The Villa recognition in the Architectural field. Let us submit details of the Ferrocraft Line UTTLE V BAILEY allmetal R;« diator Cabinets are the ultimate in for all heating and ventilating purposes; or T design, construction and finish. Selec­ send us specifications of your special needs. tion of models in finishes to match in­ terior. Full particulars upon request. •i J TUTTLE & BAILEY MFG. CO. Makers of Registers and Grilles for Eighty-one Tears 441 LEXINGTON AVENUE NEW YORK CITY THE PROVINCETOWN PLAYHOUSE W 25 (< THE PLAYWRIGHTS THEATRE 1 I 72 U ADVENTUROUS" TO J I- CO "COURAGEOUS II 00 "EXPERIM ENTAL n H o HERE—Eugene O'Neill's "Emperor Jones" and "Hairy Ape" were first produced o u HERE—Hasenclever's "Beyond" and Strindberg's "Dream Play" were given for first time in America HERE—"Fashion" and "Patience" were revived > HERE—"In Abraham's Bosom" by Paul Green, won the Pulitzer Prize C w 2^ro SUBSCRIPTION SEASON 1927-28 FIVE PLAYS $11.00 o CATALOGUE ORGANIZED BY LITTLE REVIEW, NEW YORK JANE HEAP SOCIETE DES URBANISTES. BRUS­ SELS LOUIS VAN DER SWAELMEN M. GASPARD » U. S. S. R. SOCIETY OF CULTURAL RELATIONS WITH FOREIGN COUN­ TRIES AMERICA BRANCH KUNSTGEWERBESCHULE, VIENNA PROF. JOSEF FRANK CZLONKOWIE GROUP "PRAESENG", WARSAW SZYMON SYRKUS ARCHITECTS D. P. L. G., PARIS ANDRE LURCAT.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction: De-Industrialization and Globalization
    IRSH 47 (2002), pp. 3–33 DOI: 10.1017/S0020859002000767 # 2002 Internationaal Instituut voor Sociale Geschiedenis Introduction: De-industrialization and Globalization Christopher H. Johnson THE RELATION BETWEEN DE-INDUSTRIALIZATION AND GLOBALIZATION The problem of de-industrialization has undergone a decisive transmuta- tion in the past two decades, roughly from the moment when it was linked to proto-industrialization at the Budapest Economic History Conference in 1981.1 Also interacting with the remarkable efforts of Immanuel Wallerstein and his colleagues who dated the formation of a ‘‘world economic system’’ from the expansion of European conquest and trade in the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries, its place in historical and sociological analysis rapidly transcended local concerns (such as the warmly received 1982 study by Bluestone and Harrison of the American ‘‘rust belt’’) and has become an element in the overall problematique of global capitalism.2 Only very recently, however, have the necessary studies (and hence theoretical perspectives) formed an appropriate critical mass to integrate the concept of de-industrialization fully into the long-term history of economic globalism. We are coming to understand that the phenomenon at the tip of the tongue of every head of state and the source of massive (and lethal) protest that came to be termed ‘‘globalization’’ in ordinary 1. See Franklin Mendels, ‘‘General Report, Eighth International Economic History Congress, Section A.2: Proto-industrialization: Theory and Reality’’, Budapest, August 1982, and attached papers (photocopied reproductions). An excellent collection of articles selected from these papers appeared as Carlo Poni (ed.) Protoindustria, a special issue of Quaderni strorici, 52 (1983).
    [Show full text]
  • Second Machine Age Or Fifth Technological Revolution? Different
    Second Machine Age or Fifth Technological Revolution? Different interpretations lead to different recommendations – Reflections on Erik Brynjolfsson and Andrew McAfee’s book The Second Machine Age (2014). Part 1 Introduction: the pitfalls of historical periodization Carlota Perez January 2017 Blog post: http://beyondthetechrevolution.com/blog/second-machine-age-or-fifth-technological- revolution/ This is the first instalment in a series of posts (and a Working Paper in progress) that reflect on aspects of Erik Brynjolfsson and Andrew McAfee’s influential book, The Second Machine Age (2014), in order to examine how different historical understandings of technological revolutions can influence policy recommendations in the present. Over the next few weeks, we will discuss the various criteria used for identifying a technological revolution, the nature of the current moment, and the different implications that stem from taking either the ‘machine ages’ or my ‘great surges’ point of view. We will look at what we see as the virtues and limits of Brynjolfsson and McAfee’s policy proposals, and why implementing policies appropriate to the stage of development of any technological revolution have been crucial to unleashing ‘Golden Ages’ in the past. 1 Introduction: the pitfalls of historical periodization Information technology has been such an obvious disrupter and game changer across our societies and economies that the past few years have seen a great revival of the notion of ‘technological revolutions’. Preparing for the next industrial revolution was the theme of the World Economic Forum at Davos in 2016; the European Union (EU) has strategies in place to cope with the changes that the current ‘revolution’ is bringing.
    [Show full text]
  • Cubism Futurism Art Deco
    20TH Century Art Early 20th Century styles based on SHAPE and FORM: Cubism Futurism Art Deco to show the ‘concept’ of an object rather than creating a detail of the real thing to show different views of an object at once, emphasizing time, space & the Machine age to simplify objects to their most basic, primitive terms 20TH CENTURY ART & ARCHITECTURE Cubism & Picasso Pablo Picasso 1881-1973 Considered most influential artist of 20th Century Blue Period Rose Period Analytical Cubism Synthetic Cubism 20TH CENTURY ART & ARCHITECTURE Cubism & Picasso Early works by a young Picasso Girl Wearing Large Hat, 1901. Lola, the artist’s sister, 1901. 20TH CENTURY ART & ARCHITECTURE Cubism & Picasso Picasso’s Blue Period Blue Period (1901-1904) Moves to Paris in his late teens Coping with suicide of friend Paintings were lonely, depressing Major color was BLUE! 20TH CENTURY ART & ARCHITECTURE Cubism & Picasso Picasso’s Blue Period Pablo Picasso, Blue Nude, 1902. BLUE PERIOD 20TH CENTURY ART & ARCHITECTURE Cubism & Picasso Picasso’s Blue Period Pablo Picasso, Self Portrait, 1901. BLUE PERIOD 20TH CENTURY ART & ARCHITECTURE Cubism & Picasso Picasso’s Blue Period Pablo Picasso, Tragedy, 1903. BLUE PERIOD 20TH CENTURY ART & ARCHITECTURE Cubism & Picasso Picasso’s Blue Period Pablo Picasso, Le Gourmet, 1901. BLUE PERIOD 20TH CENTURY ART & ARCHITECTURE Cubism & Picasso Picasso’s work at the National Gallery (DC) 20TH CENTURY ART & ARCHITECTURE Cubism & Picasso Picasso’s Rose Period Rose Period (1904-1906) Much happier art than before Circus people as subjects Reds and warmer colors Pablo Picasso, Harlequin Family, 1905. ROSE PERIOD 20TH CENTURY ART & ARCHITECTURE Cubism & Picasso Picasso’s Rose Period Pablo Picasso, La Familia de Saltimbanques, 1905.
    [Show full text]
  • Second Machine Age Or Fifth Technological Revolution? (Part 1)
    Second machine age or fifth technological revolution? (Part 1) medium.com/iipp-blog/second-machine-age-or-fifth-technological-revolution-part-1-ed66b81a9352 UCL IIPP September 11, 2018 Carlota Perez This is the first instalment in a series of posts that reflect on aspects of Erik Brynjolfsson and Andrew McAfee’s influential book, The Second Machine Age, in order to examine how different historical understandings of technological revolutions can influence policy recommendations in the present. Introduction: the pitfalls of historical periodisation Information technology has been such an obvious disrupter and game changer across our societies and economies that the past few years have seen a great revival of the notion of ‘technological revolutions’. Preparing for the next industrial revolution was the theme of the World Economic Forum at Davos in 2016; the European Union (EU) has strategies in place to cope with the changes that the current ‘revolution’ is bringing. Yet between these two institutions, as amongst academics, there is disagreement: on the number of revolutions; on when one has ended and another begun; on what have been the drivers and the immediate and long-term consequences. The most common classification identifies three revolutions to date, often focusing on the dominant technologies-as-inventions: the steam engine that powered the nineteenth century; electricity and the automobile in the twentieth; and ICT at present. More multi-faceted analyses recognise ‘technological revolutions’, as I do, not as dependent on single entities or energy sources but as interconnected clusters of new and dynamic inputs, processes, products and industries. Such analyses also include organisational and institutional innovation, in an attempt to understand how and by what means the new technologies diffuse and profoundly change our economies and societies.
    [Show full text]
  • Commercial Standards Monthly, S
    COMMERCIALfAAR 2 7 1933 STANDARDS vV^ , ,v\ V' ^MONTHLY A Review of Progress in Commercial Standardisation and Simplification I’hotoKraphiMl l>y Army Air Corps AIRPLANE VIEW OF BUREAU OF STANDARDS (LOOKING SOUTH) ISSUED BY THE BUREAU OF STANDARDS OF THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, WASHINGTON, D. C., U. S. A. Vol. 9, No. 9 March, 1933 For sale by the Superinten Jcnt of Documents, W'ashington, D, C. $1.00 annually ($1.60 lorcign i ; single copy, 1 0 cents U. S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE BUREAU OF STANDARDS ROY D. CHAPIN, Secretary LYMAN J. BRIGGS, Acting Director COMMERCIAL STANDARDS MONTHLY, S. F. Tillman, Editor The Commercial Standardization Group A. S. McAllister, Assistant Director DIVISION OF SIMPLIFIED PRACTICE DIVISION OF SPECIFICATIONS Edwin W. Ely A. S. 'McAllister The division of simplified pradlice cooperates with indus- The duties of the division of specifications are to promote trial and commercial groups to reduce wa^te, usually through and facilitate the use and unification of specifications. In eliminating unnecessary variety of product, method, or doing so it carries on activities involving cooperation with practice. Its fundfion is to bring together all parties inter- technical societies; trade associations; Federal, State, and ested in a projedt of this charadter, and to coordinate their municipal Government specifications making and using work in developing a simplified pradtice recommendation. agencies; producers, distributors, and consumers; and teSting Such work includes surveys of current pradtice, formula- and research laboratories. It ascertains the standardization tion of a simplified pradtice program, and presentation of and specifications promoting activities of the associations that program for adtion by a general conference representing and societies, and brings to their attention the work being all interests.
    [Show full text]
  • Challenges and Opportunities of Digital Production Technologies for Developing Countries Department of Policy, Research and Statistics Working Paper 7/2019
    Inclusive and Sustainable Industrial Development Working Paper Series WP 7 | 2019 A REVOLUTION IN THE MAKING? CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES OF DIGITAL PRODUCTION TECHNOLOGIES FOR DEVELOPING COUNTRIES DEPARTMENT OF POLICY, RESEARCH AND STATISTICS WORKING PAPER 7/2019 A revolution in the making? Challenges and opportunities of digital production technologies for developing countries Antonio Andreoni UCL Institute for Innovation and Public Purpose Guendalina Anzolin University of Urbino UNITED NATIONS INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION Vienna, 2019 This is a Background Paper for the UNIDO Industrial Development Report 2020: Industrializing in the Digital Age The designations employed, descriptions and classifications of countries, and the presentation of the material in this report do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO) concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries, or its economic system or degree of development. The views expressed in this paper do not necessarily reflect the views of the Secretariat of the UNIDO. The responsibility for opinions expressed rests solely with the authors, and publication does not constitute an endorsement by UNIDO. Although great care has been taken to maintain the accuracy of information herein, neither UNIDO nor its member States assume any responsibility for consequences which may arise from the use of the material. Terms such as “developed”, “industrialized” and “developing” are intended for statistical convenience and do not necessarily express a judgment. Any indication of, or reference to, a country, institution or other legal entity does not constitute an endorsement.
    [Show full text]
  • The Second Machine Age by Erik Brynjolfsson and Andrew Mcafee Commentary by J
    The Second Machine Age by Erik Brynjolfsson and Andrew McAfee Commentary by J. Craig Wheeler I found the book a little disappointing in several regards. One of the points is technical, but the perspective pervades the book. In the third chapter they talk about Moore’s law and illustrate the power of plotting an exponential growth in a log plot, where it appears as a straight line, rather than in a linear plot, where it appears to have a “knee.” The point is that if the growth of some aspect is roughly exponential, it is scale free. There is no knee. Their metaphor of the “second half of the chessboard” does not really make any sense. There is no finite chess board, unless it is the size of the planet, and even then if you ponder the Universe, the chess board could be infinite. They point out that Ray Kurzweil gives an excellent exposition of exponential growth in all sorts of aspects. That is one reason I use his book in my class. My specific gripe in this regard is that they start off making their case by looking at the “human social development index” in a linear plot where it looks like the development of the steam engine “bent the curve of human history.” They never plot that graph in log space. I don’t have the data, so I can’t be sure, but it would look much less dramatic. Perhaps there is a “kink” with the industrial age, but maybe not. Same for the second machine age.
    [Show full text]
  • The Machine Age in the 1920S
    BECOMING MODERN: AMERICA IN THE 1920S PRIMARY SOURCE COLLECTION ONTEMPORAR Y * IN OMMENTARY THE T WENTIES C “A vision of modern progress,” illustration in Popular Science Monthly, February 1928 (detail) — THE “MACHINE AGE” — Will MACHINES liberate man or enslave him? Will they deliver a bounteous future previously unimaginable, or a barren soulless prison of man’s making? Perennial questions. Here we examine how they were addressed in the 1920s through the writings of industrialists, engineers, economists, clergymen, novelists, a dramatist, a humorist, and other voices who cheered, mourned, or questioned the longterm consequences for man of his precocious offspring, the machine. People call this the mechanistic age, enlarge upon its many Edward S. Martin objectionable features and grumble about the acceleration of “Model T and the Millennium” life and all that. But what would they have? Is the mechanistic Harper’s, February 1928 age a good thing or a bad thing? Is the speeding up of life a basis for satisfaction or for regret? Twenty miles on the highway in old times used to be a pretty fair day’s work for a team. It took three or four hours to do it. When it was done the horses needed to rest and be fed. Now it is something to be done, where the roads are good, in half an hour or a little more by a creature that is not tired when it has done it. The speeding up of life is trying of course, but who can doubt that it is an immense achievement! Our great property in this life is time, and when we get about more quickly we save it.
    [Show full text]
  • Deloitte, "Talent for Survival: Essential Skills for Humans Working in The
    Talent for survival Essential skills for humans working in the machine age Contents Foreword 1 Introduction 2 Shifts in the national economy 4 What human talents are most important? 6 Shifts in industry sectors 18 Challenges yet to be overcome 22 Our conclusion – get the mix right 24 Endnotes 26 Contacts 28 In this publication, references to Deloitte are references to Deloitte LLP, the UK member firm of DTTL. Talent for survival | Essential skills for humans working in the machine age Foreword You may have heard that robots are coming for your job. Rapid advances in robotics, big data and artificial intelligence are beginning to disrupt entire industries, and technology is threatening to replace more than ten million UK workers. But a new debate is now raging between those who argue that we are ushering in an era of unprecedented technological unemployment, and those who claim that job prospects for people with the right mix of talent have never been better. While the debate rages on, we have been examining the data that allows us to understand the changing demand for individual skills, knowledge and abilities caused by technology shifts. Based on our analysis, we believe that, although Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) skills and knowledge are important in an increasingly digital economy, the UK will benefit most from a workforce that has a balance of technical skills and more general purpose skills, such as problem-solving skills, creativity, social skills and emotional intelligence. We forecast that by 2030, such will be the demand for these general purpose skills that meeting it will require the equivalent of at least 4.5 million additional workers in professional occupations.
    [Show full text]
  • The Future of Work: Race With—Not Against—The Machine
    Research & Policy Briefs From the World Bank Malaysia Hub No. 16, August 2018 The Future of Work: Race with—not against—the Machine Lay Lian Chuah, Norman V. Loayza, and Achim D. Schmillen Will the revolution in digital and information technologies make us obsolete? Will jobs be lost and never replaced? Will wages Public Disclosure Authorized drop to intolerable levels? History and economic theory and evidence suggest that in the long term, such fears are misplaced. However, in the short and medium term, dislocation can be severe for certain types of work, places, and populations. In the transition period, policies are needed to facilitate labor market flexibility and mobility, introduce and strengthen safety nets and social protection, and improve education and training. The Fear: Are We Running Out of Jobs? countries, the overall evidence on the relationship between employment growth and the skills distribution is both more There is growing fear that recent and emerging breakthroughs in tentative and mixed. While the relationship has been U-shaped technologies such as artificial intelligence (AI) and robotics will for countries as diverse as Malaysia, Poland, and Turkey, patterns lead to the wholesale replacement of human workers by for China and a range of other developing countries have differed machines and an era of mass joblessness and even wider income (figure 1). This diversity is likely to be related to the interaction inequality. The U.S. magazine Mother Jones reports, “Smart between local labor market conditions, including the skills machines probably won’t kill us all—but they’ll definitely take distribution, and the technologies that are adopted.
    [Show full text]