DOCSLIB.ORG

Congressional Record—House H 9309

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Congressional Record—House H 9309 September 20, 1995 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD Ð HOUSE H 9309 are 67 percent effective in preventing brain in- The vote was taken by electronic de- Morella Rogers Tanner vice, and there wereÐyeas 419, nays 7, Murtha Rohrabacher Tate jury, exactly the type of injury that needs ex- Myers Ros-Lehtinen Tauzin pensive, long-term care. not voting 8, as follows: Myrick Rose Taylor (MS) Nadler Roth Most riders who incur these injuries are [Roll No. 679] Tejeda young people. That means the long-term care Neal Roybal-Allard Thomas Nethercutt Royce for such riders who incur severe injuries can YEASÐ419 Thompson Neumann Rush Thornberry Abercrombie DeLay Horn last for 20, 30, or even 40 years. And, in most Ney Sabo Thornton Ackerman Deutsch Hostettler Norwood Salmon Thurman cases, public sources, such as Medicaid, will Allard Diaz-Balart Houghton Nussle Sanders Tiahrt be paying the bills. Andrews Dickey Hoyer Oberstar Sanford This body is currently considering reforming Archer Dicks Hunter Torkildsen Obey Sawyer Torres the Medicaid Program. If we care about con- Armey Dingell Hutchinson Olver Saxton Bachus Dixon Hyde Torricelli trolling costs, we must care about preventing Ortiz Scarborough Towns Baesler Doggett Inglis Owens Schaefer Traficant the lessening the severity of injuries in motor- Baker (CA) Dooley Istook Oxley Schiff Upton cycle crashes. Baker (LA) Doolittle Jackson-Lee Packard Schroeder Vela zquez Baldacci Dornan Jefferson Pallone Schumer The best way to do that is to encourage Vento Ballenger Doyle Johnson (CT) Parker Scott States to require all riders to wear helmets. Visclosky Barcia Dreier Johnson (SD) Pastor Seastrand Current law does not force States to pass hel- Barr Duncan Johnson, E. B. Paxon Sensenbrenner Vucanovich met laws. If they choose not to, a small por- Barrett (NE) Dunn Johnson, Sam Payne (NJ) Serrano Waldholtz tion of certain highway funds is directed to Barrett (WI) Durbin Jones Payne (VA) Shadegg Walker Bartlett Edwards Kanjorski Walsh safety programs. Pelosi Shaw Barton Ehlers Kaptur Peterson (FL) Shays Wamp This is a reasonable approach that over Bass Ehrlich Kasich Peterson (MN) Shuster Ward time saves taxpayers millions of dollars. Bateman Emerson Kelly Petri Skaggs Watt (NC) I urge a ``yes'' vote on the amendment. Becerra Engel Kennedy (RI) Pickett Skeen Watts (OK) The CHAIRMAN. The question is on Bentsen English Kennelly Pombo Skelton Waxman Bereuter Ensign Kildee Pomeroy Slaughter Weldon (FL) amendment offered by the gentleman Berman Eshoo Kim Porter Smith (MI) Weldon (PA) from Kentucky [Mr. WARD]. Bevill Evans King Portman Smith (NJ) Weller The amendment was rejected. Bilbray Everett Kingston Poshard Smith (TX) White The CHAIRMAN. Are there further Bilirakis Ewing Kleczka Pryce Smith (WA) Whitfield Bishop Farr Klink Quillen Solomon Wicker amendments? Bliley Fattah Klug Quinn Souder Williams If not, the question is on the amend- Blute Fawell Knollenberg Radanovich Spence Wilson ment in the nature of a substitute, as Boehlert Fazio Kolbe Rahall Spratt Wise amended. Boehner Fields (LA) LaFalce Ramstad Stark Wolf Bonilla Fields (TX) LaHood Rangel Stearns Woolsey The amendment in the nature of a Bonior Filner Lantos Reed Stenholm Wyden substitute, as amended, was agreed to. Bono Flake Largent Regula Stockman Wynn The CHAIRMAN. Under the rule, the Borski Flanagan Latham Richardson Stokes Yates Committee rises. Boucher Foglietta LaTourette Riggs Studds Young (AK) Brewster Foley Laughlin Rivers Stump Young (FL) Accordingly the Committee rose; and Browder Forbes Lazio Roberts Stupak Zeliff the Speaker pro tempore (Mr. DIAZ- Brown (CA) Ford Leach Roemer Talent Zimmer BALART) having assumed the chair, Mr. Brown (FL) Fowler Levin Brown (OH) Fox Lewis (CA) NAYSÐ7 HANSEN, Chairman of the Committee of Brownback Frank (MA) Lewis (GA) Beilenson Jacobs Waters the Whole House on the State of the Bryant (TN) Franks (CT) Lewis (KY) Dellums Johnston Union, reported that that Committee, Bryant (TX) Franks (NJ) Lightfoot Gibbons Orton having had under consideration the bill Bunn Frelinghuysen Lincoln Bunning Frisa Linder NOT VOTINGÐ8 (H.R. 2274) to amend title 23, United Burr Frost Lipinski Kennedy (MA) Roukema Tucker Burton Funderburk Livingston States Code, to designate the National Moakley Sisisky Buyer Furse LoBiondo Volkmer Highway System, and for other pur- Reynolds Taylor (NC) Callahan Gallegly Lofgren poses, pursuant to House Resolution Calvert Ganske Longley b 1753 224, he reported the bill back to the Camp Gejdenson Lowey House with an amendment adopted by Canady Gekas Lucas Mr. GIBBONS changed his vote from Cardin Gephardt Luther ``yea'' to ``nay.'' the Committee of the Whole. Castle Geren Maloney The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under Chabot Gilchrest Manton Messrs. BACHUS, FATTAH, and the rule, the previous question is or- Chambliss Gillmor Manzullo FOGLIETTA changed their vote from dered. Chapman Gilman Markey ``nay'' to ``yea.'' Is a separate vote demanded on any Chenoweth Gonzalez Martinez Christensen Goodlatte Martini So the bill was passed. amendment to the amendment in the Chrysler Goodling Mascara The result of the vote was announced nature of a substitute adopted by the Clay Gordon Matsui as recorded. Committee of the Whole? If not, the Clayton Goss McCarthy A motion to reconsider was laid on Clement Graham McCollum question is on the amendment. Clinger Green McCrery the table. The amendment was agreed to. Clyburn Greenwood McDade f The SPEAKER pro tempore. The Coble Gunderson McDermott question is on the engrossment and Coburn Gutierrez McHale GENERAL LEAVE Coleman Gutknecht McHugh third reading of the bill. Collins (GA) Hall (OH) McInnis Mr. SHUSTER. Mr. Speaker, I ask The bill was ordered to be engrossed Collins (IL) Hall (TX) McIntosh unanimous consent that all Members and read a third time, and was read the Collins (MI) Hamilton McKeon have 5 legislative days in which to re- third time. Combest Hancock McKinney Condit Hansen McNulty vise and extend their remarks on H.R. The SPEAKER pro tempore. The Conyers Harman Meehan 2274, the bill just passed. question is on the passage of the bill. Cooley Hastert Meek The SPEAKER pro tempore (Mr. The question was taken; and the Costello Hastings (FL) Menendez Speaker pro tempore announced that Cox Hastings (WA) Metcalf TORKILDSEN). Is there objection to the the ayes appeared to have it. Coyne Hayes Meyers request of the gentleman from Penn- Cramer Hayworth Mfume sylvania? Mr. SHUSTER. Mr. Speaker, I object Crane Hefley Mica to the vote on the ground that a Crapo Hefner Miller (CA) There was no objection. quorum is not present and make the Cremeans Heineman Miller (FL) f Cubin Herger Mineta point of order that a quorum is not Cunningham Hilleary Minge NATIONAL HIGHWAY SYSTEM present. Danner Hilliard Mink The SPEAKER pro tempore. Evi- Davis Hinchey Molinari DESIGNATION ACT OF 1995 dently a quorum is not present. de la Garza Hobson Mollohan Mr. SHUSTER. Mr. Speaker, I ask Deal Hoekstra Montgomery The Sergeant at Arms will notify ab- DeFazio Hoke Moorhead unanimous consent to take from the sent Members. DeLauro Holden Moran Speaker's table the Senate bill (S. 440)VerDate 20-SEP-95 07:02 Sep 21, 1995 Jkt 099061 PO 00000 Frm 00061 Fmt 7634 Sfmt 0634 E:\CR\CRI\H20SE5.REC h20se1 H 9310 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD Ð HOUSE September 20, 1995 to amend title 23, United States Code, Sec. 131. Rural access projects. TITLE IÐHIGHWAY PROVISIONS Sec. 132. Inclusion of high priority corridors. to provide for the designation of the SEC. 101. NATIONAL HIGHWAY SYSTEM DESIGNA- National Highway System, and for Sec. 133. Sense of the Senate regarding the TION. Federal-State funding relation- (a) IN GENERAL.ÐSection 103 of title 23, other purposes, and ask for its imme- ship for transportation. United States Code, is amended by inserting diate consideration in the House. Sec. 134. Quality through competition. The Clerk read the title of the Senate Sec. 135. Federal share for economic growth after subsection (b) the following: bill. center development highways. ``(c) NATIONAL HIGHWAY SYSTEM DESIGNA- The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there Sec. 136. Vehicle weight and longer com- TION.Ð objection to the request of the gen- bination vehicles exemption for ``(1) DESIGNATION.ÐThe most recent Na- Sioux City, Iowa. tional Highway System (as of the date of en- tleman from Pennsylvania? actment of this Act) as submitted by the There was no objection. Sec. 137. Revision of authority for conges- tion relief project in California. Secretary of Transportation pursuant to this The Clerk read the Senate bill, as fol- Sec. 138. Applicability of certain vehicle section is designated as the National High- lows: weight limitations in Wiscon- way System. S. 440 sin. ``(2) MODIFICATIONS.Ð Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Rep- Sec. 139. Prohibition on new highway dem- ``(A) IN GENERAL.ÐAt the request of a resentatives of the United States of America in onstration projects. State, the Secretary mayÐ Congress assembled, Sec. 140. Treatment of Centennial Bridge, ``(i) add a new route segment to the Na- tional Highway System, including a new SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE; TABLE OF CONTENTS. Rock Island, Illinois, agree- ment. intermodal connection; or (a) SHORT TITLE.ÐThis Act may be cited as Sec. 141. Moratorium on certain emissions ``(ii) delete a route segment in existence on the ``National Highway System Designation the date of the request and any connection Act of 1995''. testing requirements. Sec. 142. Elimination of penalties for non- to the route segment; (b) TABLE OF CONTENTS.ÐThe table of con- tents of this Act is as follows: compliance with motorcycle if the total mileage of the National Highway Sec. 1. Short title; table of contents. helmet use requirement. System (including any route segment or con- Sec. 143. Clarification of Eligibility. nection proposed to be added under this sub- TITLE IÐHIGHWAY PROVISIONS Sec. 144. Toll roads, bridges, tunnels, non- paragraph) does not exceed 165,000 miles Sec. 101. National Highway System designa- toll roads that have a dedicated (265,542 kilometers).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • TRB Special Report 267: Regulation of Weights, Lengths, And
    Regulation of Weights, Lengths, and Widths of Commercial Motor Vehicles SPECIAL REPORT 267 TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD 2002 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE* Chairman: E. Dean Carlson, Secretary, Kansas Department of Transportation, Topeka Vice Chairman: Genevieve Giuliano, Professor, School of Policy, Planning, and Development, University of Southern California, Los Angeles Executive Director: Robert E. Skinner, Jr., Transportation Research Board William D. Ankner, Director, Rhode Island Department of Transportation, Providence Thomas F. Barry, Jr., Secretary of Transportation, Florida Department of Transportation, Tallahassee Michael W. Behrens, Executive Director, Texas Department of Transportation, Austin Jack E. Buffington, Associate Director and Research Professor, Mack-Blackwell National Rural Transportation Study Center, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville Sarah C. Campbell, President, TransManagement, Inc., Washington, D.C. Joanne F. Casey, President, Intermodal Association of North America, Greenbelt, Maryland James C. Codell III, Secretary, Kentucky Transportation Cabinet, Frankfort John L. Craig, Director, Nebraska Department of Roads, Lincoln Robert A. Frosch, Senior Research Fellow, Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts Susan Hanson, Landry University Professor of Geography, Graduate School of Geography, Clark University, Worcester, Massachusetts Lester A. Hoel, L.A. Lacy Distinguished Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, University
    [Show full text]
  • EVALUATING the IMPACT of OVERWEIGHT LOAD ROUTING on BURIED UTILITY FACILITIES By
    1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. FHWA/TX-12/0-6394-2 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date EVALUATING THE IMPACT OF OVERWEIGHT LOAD October 2011 ROUTING ON BURIED UTILITY FACILITIES Published: December 2011 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Edgar Kraus, Jeong Ho Oh, Emmanuel Fernando, Eric Yingfeng Li, Report 0-6394-2 Cesar Quiroga, and Nicholas Koncz 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Texas Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System 11. Contract or Grant No. College Station, Texas 77843-3135 Project 0-6394 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Texas Department of Transportation Technical Report: Research and Technology Implementation Office September 2009–August 2011 P.O. Box 5080 14. Sponsoring Agency Code Austin, Texas 78763-5080 15. Supplementary Notes Project performed in cooperation with the Texas Department of Transportation and the Federal Highway Administration. Project Title: Evaluation of Overweight Load Routing on Buried Utility Plant URL: http://tti.tamu.edu/documents/0-6394-2.pdf 16. Abstract Overweight traffic movements can negatively affect pavement integrity and quality. However, it is less known to what degree buried utility facilities along and across the right of way are affected by these overweight loads, especially if the utility facility is aged, placed under an exception to the Utility Accommodation Rules (UAR), and/or subjected to repetitive loads. Routing decisions for repetitive overweight loads may be determined without consideration of cumulative impacts to utility infrastructure, particularly municipally owned lines that could be aged, accommodated under an exception, or of substandard materials.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of State Speed Laws
    DOT HS 810 826 August 2007 Summary of State Speed Laws Tenth Edition Current as of January 1, 2007 This document is available to the public from the National Technical Information Service, Springfield, Virginia 22161 This publication is distributed by the U.S. Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, in the interest of information exchange. The opinions, findings, and conclusions expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the Department of Transportation or the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. The United States Government assumes no liability for its contents or use thereof. If trade or manufacturers' names or products are mentioned, it is because they are considered essential to the object of the publication and should not be construed as an endorsement. The United States Government does not endorse products or manufacturers. TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ...................................................iii Missouri ......................................................138 Alabama..........................................................1 Montana ......................................................143 Alaska.............................................................5 Nebraska .....................................................150 Arizona ...........................................................9 Nevada ........................................................157 Arkansas .......................................................15 New
    [Show full text]
  • Dakota County Rural Economic Development Strategic Plan Adopted May 21, 2018
    Dakota County Rural Economic Development Strategic Plan 2017-2018 Acknowledgements & Contributors Dakota County Board of Commissioners Scott Love, Chair Antonio A. Gomez Martin V. Hohenstein Kevin W. Rohde William B. Rohde Dakota County Staff Joan Spencer, County Clerk Joe O’Neill, Dakota County P&Z Administrator Steering Committee Village of Emerson - Cathy Duncan, Village Clerk Village of Homer - Diane Rewinkel, Village Clerk Village of Hubbard - Lisa Bousquet, Deputy Village Clerk Village of Jackson - Donna Hirsch, Village Clerk City of Dakota City - Alyssa Silhacek, City Administrator City of South Sioux City - Kelly Flynn, Director of Economic Development City of South Sioux City – Lance Hedquist, City Administrator Dakota County Planning & Zoning – Jean Grove, Village of Hubbard Representative Dakota County Planning & Zoning – Christy Henjes, Lue Franco Dakota County Connections Program Coordinator - Jo Ann Gieselman Northeast Community College – Cynthia Hanson, Executive Director Siouxland Economic Development Corporation - Ken Beekley, Executive Vice President Siouxland Ethanol - Pam Miller, Board Chair Director of Industry & Investor Relations South Sioux City Area Chamber - Jim Steele, President South Sioux City School District - Todd Strom, Superintendent Wayne State College - Judith Scherer Connealy SIMPCO Staff Michelle Bostinelos, Executive Director Nicole Peterson, Regional Planner II Gabriel Appiah, Regional Planner I Joe Surdam, Regional Planner I *This study was funded by Nebraska Department of Economic Development Table
    [Show full text]
  • Roth Industrial Comprehensive Needs Assessment
    South Sioux City Overview Summary General Site Information • The site area is +/- 1,780 acres. • The site boundaries are as follows: • Northern Boundary: Interstate 129 • Eastern Boundary: C Avenue • Southern Boundary: Dakota City • Western Boundary: E Avenue and the Old Crystal Lake • Currently there are approximately 362 acres that have been or are being developed. Industries that are located within the site are Beef Products Inc. (BPI), CHS, Omega Industries, Richardson Milling, Tyson Foods, and Big Ox Energy. • Of the remaining 1,408 acres, 1264 acres are undeveloped with the remainder dedicated for transportation Right Of Way. • The undeveloped land parcels are owned by separate entities. The City of South Sioux City currently contains options on select properties. • A site location map is included in the appendix of this report. Site Topography and Floodplain Information • The site is generally flat. The developed areas mostly drain to Old Crystal Lake via the City of South Sioux City’s storm sewer system. • A review of the current Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) floodplain maps has been performed on the site. None of the site is within a Special Flood Hazard Area. Wetlands Information Construction activities that affect wetlands should be given special consideration. Wetlands have the potential to be classified as Waters of the State or Waters of the United States. Wetlands that are determined to be Waters of the United States (jurisdictional) are subject to review by the Army Corps of Engineers. Major impacts to existing wetlands that are jurisdictional must be permitted and will typically have a review period with the Corps of Engineers (six-to-nine months).
    [Show full text]
  • Comprehensive Plan
    South Sioux City, NE Comprehensive Plan Adopted: July 24, 2017 Ordinance: 2017-12 Project #: 140310.00 2 | SOUTH SIOUX CITY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ACKNOWLEDGMENTS CITY COUNCIL Mayor Rod Koch Oscar Gomez, Council President Dennis Nelson John Sanders Dan Bousquet Jack Ehrich Bruce Davis Jason Bowman Carol A. Schuldt PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION Martin Hohenstein John Koskovich Lyle Todd Arlyn Wilson Arlan Kuehn Gail Curry Brett Gotch Mike Wojcik Lance Morgan Robert Rapp CITIZEN ADVISORY COMMITTEE Jack Ehrich, Chairman Gail Curry Angela Klemmensen Tom Luxford Lori Warner Kevin O'Dell Brett Gotch PLANNING CONSULTANTS - JEO CONSULTING GROUP, INC. Jeffrey B. Ray, AICP Kevin Andersen Tonya Carlson Clint Sloss Phil Luebbert Ethan Joy, PE BIG MUDDY WORKSHOP John Royster, FASLA, PLA Katie Swanson, ASLA, PLA SOUTH SIOUX CITY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN | 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 1 South Sioux City Profile 2 South Sioux City Envision 3 South Sioux City Achieve 4 South Sioux City Implement 5 South Sioux City 4 | SOUTH SIOUX CITY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 1.1 City Overview 10 1.2 The Purpose of Comprehensive Planning 12 1.3 The Comprehensive Planning Process 12 2.1 Introduction 16 2.2 Demographic Profile 16 2.3 Housing Profile 24 2.4 Economic and Employment 31 2.5 Community Facilities and Utilities 36 2.6 Parks and Recreation Plan 43 2.7 Existing Land Use 84 2.8 Natural and Environmental Conditions 86 2.9 Energy Element 90 3.1 Introduction 102 3.2 Focus Group Meetings 102 3.3 Town Hall Meetings 116 4.1 Introduction 120 4.2 Population Projection 120 4.3 Housing
    [Show full text]
  • Sergeant Floyd Memorial Bridge
    INTCRSTATC 129 SERGEANT FLOYD MEMORIAL BRIDGE " . -·- . ___ :r- ::zg:~"=='---;--~-' - . _· -­ . ----. - . - ~~~~ DCD/CATIDN MONDAY, NOVEMBER 22~ 1976 ,., 11:00 A.M. PRDGRAWI MASTER of CEREMONIES DEDICATION CEREMONY WALT ER L. MoRRIS JOHN B. KEMP DEPUTY DIRECTOR-OPERATION REGIONAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATOR HIGHWAY DIVI SION FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADM-INISTRATION IoWA DEPA fi TMENT OF TRANSPORTATION UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION INVOCATION RE VER END DR. T. J. C. ScHULDT PARTICIPANTS PASTOR 1 FIRST LUTHERAN CHURCH GovER NOR RoBERT D. RAY1 IowA Sou TH Sioux CITY1 NEBRASKA GovERNOR J. JAMES ExoNJ NEBRASKA ERNEST L. ALBERTSEN} SOUTH SIOUX CITYJ WELCOME i~ EBRASKA MAYOR KEITH FERRIS1 SOUTH SIOUX CITY1 NEBRASKA TH E HONORABLE CHARLES E. STRONG MAYOR G. WILLIAM GRoss~ Sioux CITY1 IowA MA YOR --DAKOTA CITYJ NEBRASKA MAYOR RAY MANNI SERGEANT BLUFF1 IowA CHAIRMA N--SIMPCO COMMISSIONER GEORGE SHRADER 1 DAKOTA COUNTY 1 NEB RASKA MAYOR CHARLES E. STRONG} DAKOTA CITYJ NEBRASKA INTRODUCTIONS SuPERVISOR JERRY O'SuLLIVAN~ WooDBURY CouNTY1 IowA TH E HoNoRABLE G. WILLIAM GRoss MA YoR--Sioux CITY1 IowA ASSISTING THE HoN ORABLE KEITH FERRIS WIL~IAM w. AMUNDSO N JosEPH L. HoLDEFER MA YOR- -SOUTH SIOUX CITYJ NEBRASKA RALPH F. BEERMAN N MERLE KING SBURY PAUL A. BERGER DoNALD K. McKINNEY REMARKS RoBERT BLESSING DoNALD M. MEISNER THE HoNORABLE RoBERT D. RAY CoRNELius BoDINE~ JR. DONALD J I MULLIN GovERNOR--STA TE OF IowA JULES M. BUSKER RoNALD D. RA PP JOHN E. CURFMAN JAMES E. REEDE R ROBERT RI GLER LEONARD W. DIERKING KENNETH J . RoDEEN CHAIRMAN EARLE N. GRUESKIN ALBERT E. STRE ETE R IOWA DEPT, OF TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION THE HoNO RAB LE J.
    [Show full text]
  • State Revolving Loan Fund Program
    CLEAN WATER STATE REVOLVING LOAN FUND PROGRAM FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT TO: All Interested Citizens, Government Agencies and Public Groups In accordance with the Nebraska Clean Water State Revolving Fund environmental review process, which is based on the National Environmental Policy Act, an environmental review has been performed on the proposed agency action below: PROJECT NAME: South Sioux City Industrial Wastewater Treatment System South Sioux City, Nebraska CWSRF PROJECT NUMBER: C317835 TOTAL PROJECT AMOUNT: $13,300,000 EXPECTED CWSRF LOAN: $13,300,000 The city of South Sioux City is located in Dakota County in northeast Nebraska, next to the Missouri River and across from Sioux City, Iowa. The 2010 census population for South Sioux City was 13,353. That is an increase of 12 percent from the year 2000, indicating a growing community. The South Sioux City sanitary sewer system includes about 40 miles of sewers and 15 lift stations. Their wastewater is pumped under the Missouri River for treatment at the Sioux City, Iowa regional wastewater treatment facility. That treatment facility is currently undergoing major renovations to improve the level of treatment. South Sioux City is developing the Roth Industrial Park which is located south of Interstate 129. Much of the 250 acre site is undeveloped and still used for agricultural production. There are currently three food-processing facilities at the industrial park. Some expansion at these existing facilities is planned and two new industries are proposing to build facilities at the industrial park. South Sioux City proposes to construct a new wastewater treatment system to serve the industrial facilities located in the Roth Industrial Park.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of State Speed Laws Twelfth Edition
    DOT HS 811 769 December 2013 Summary of State Speed Laws Twelfth Edition Current as of October 8, 2012 DISCLAIMER This publication is distributed by the U.S. Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, in the interest of information exchange. The opinions, findings, and conclusions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the Department of Transportation or the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. The United States Government assumes no liability for its contents or use thereof. If trade names, manufacturers’ names, or specific products are mentioned, it is because they are considered essential to the object of the publication and should not be construed as an endorsement. The United States Government does not endorse products or manufacturers. TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................................... iii OVERVIEW NARRATIVE OF KEY PROVISIONS OF STATE SPEED LAWS .............................. v Key Provisions of State Speed Laws through October 8, 2012 .............................................................. vi ALABAMA .................................................................................................................................................. 1 ALASKA ...................................................................................................................................................... 5 ARIZONA ...................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of State Speed Laws (12Th Edition)
    DOT HS 811 769 December 2013 Summary of State Speed Laws Twelfth Edition Current as of October 8, 2012 DISCLAIMER This publication is distributed by the U.S. Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, in the interest of information exchange. The opinions, findings, and conclusions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the Department of Transportation or the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. The United States Government assumes no liability for its contents or use thereof. If trade names, manufacturers’ names, or specific products are mentioned, it is because they are considered essential to the object of the publication and should not be construed as an endorsement. The United States Government does not endorse products or manufacturers. TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................................... iii OVERVIEW NARRATIVE OF KEY PROVISIONS OF STATE SPEED LAWS .............................. v Key Provisions of State Speed Laws through October 8, 2012 .............................................................. vi ALABAMA .................................................................................................................................................. 1 ALASKA ...................................................................................................................................................... 5 ARIZONA ...................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]