Herinnering Aan Een Historische Plek En Boodschap Voor De Toekomst

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Herinnering Aan Een Historische Plek En Boodschap Voor De Toekomst De omgang met ‘gevoelig erfgoed’ in educatieve programma’s voor het voortgezet onderwijs van herinneringscentra Kamp Westerbork, Vught en Amersfoort. Herinnering aan een historische plek en boodschap voor de toekomst. Ghislaine Kokshoorn Master Thesis Maatschappijgeschiedenis Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam Herinnering aan een historische plek en boodschap voor de toekomst. De omgang met ‘gevoelig erfgoed’ in educatieve programma’s voor het voortgezet onderwijs van herinneringscentra Kamp Westerbork, Vught en Amersfoort. Ghislaine Kokshoorn Master Thesis Maatschappijgeschiedenis Faculteit Erasmus School of History, Culture and Communication Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam 20 augustus 2015 Thesisbegeleider: Laurie Slegtenhorst (Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam) Tweede lezer: Prof. dr. Hester Dibbits (Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam) 1 Inhoud Voorwoord ................................................................................................................................. 4 1. Inleiding ................................................................................................................................. 6 1.1 Introductie ......................................................................................................................... 6 1.2 Vraagstelling ..................................................................................................................... 7 1.3 Theoretisch kader ........................................................................................................... 10 1.4 Historiografisch debat ..................................................................................................... 16 1.5 Bronnen .......................................................................................................................... 25 1.6 Methoden ........................................................................................................................ 28 1.7 Innovatieve aspecten ....................................................................................................... 28 2. Herinneringscentrum Westerbork ........................................................................................ 30 2.1 Historische context ......................................................................................................... 31 2.2 Beleid en educatie in het herinneringscentrum ............................................................... 32 2.3 Analyse educatief programma voor het voortgezet onderwijs ....................................... 36 2.3.1 Tentoonstelling ‘Durchgangslager Westerbork’ ...................................................... 36 2.3.2 Rondleiding voormalig Kamp Westerbork .............................................................. 46 2.4 Deelconclusie Herinneringscentrum Kamp Westerbork ................................................ 50 3. Nationaal Monument Kamp Vught ...................................................................................... 53 3.1 Historische context ......................................................................................................... 54 3.2 Beleid en educatie in het herinneringscentrum ............................................................... 55 3.3 Analyse educatief programma ‘Kamp Vught in de klas’ ............................................... 58 3.3.1 Educatieve film Kamp Vught in de klas: ‘Wie helpt mij nu nog’ ........................... 59 3.3.2 Lesbrief ‘Wie helpt mij nu nog’ ............................................................................... 64 3.3.3 Rondleiding ‘Kamp Vught in de klas’ ..................................................................... 69 3.3.4 Afrondende opdracht ............................................................................................... 74 3.4 Deelconclusie Nationaal Monument Kamp Vught ......................................................... 75 4. Nationaal Monument Kamp Amersfoort .............................................................................. 78 4.1 Historische context ......................................................................................................... 79 4.2 Beleid en educatie in het herinneringscentrum ............................................................... 81 4.3 Analyse educatief programma ‘Bertus’ .......................................................................... 83 4.3.1 Tijdschrift ‘Bertus’ ................................................................................................... 83 4.3.2 Documentaire ‘Bertus een thuiskomst’ .................................................................... 88 4.3.3 Rondleiding Kamp Amersfoort ................................................................................ 90 2 4.4 Deelconclusie Nationaal Monument Kamp Amersfoort ................................................ 95 5. Conclusie .............................................................................................................................. 97 Bibliografie ............................................................................................................................. 103 Primaire bronnen ................................................................................................................ 103 Secundaire bronnen ............................................................................................................ 104 Digitale bronnen ................................................................................................................. 106 3 Voorwoord De persoonlijke verhalen van de gruwelijke gebeurtenissen in de kampen tijdens de Tweede Wereldoorlog brengt de geschiedenis plotseling heel dichtbij. Net als de meeste mensen denk ik 'dit nooit weer'. Dat maakt dit onderzoek voor mij extra belangrijk. Het in leven houden en doorgeven van de herinnering aan volgende generaties en het tonen van respect aan de slachtoffers van de Tweede Wereldoorlog is een zaak van ons allen. Ik heb daarom enorm veel respect en waardering voor degenen die zich actief inzetten voor educatie over de Tweede Wereldoorlog en de Holocaust. Als masterstudent maatschappijgeschiedenis aan de Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam heb ik onderzoek gedaan naar de educatieve programma’s van de herinneringscentra Westerbork, Vught en Amersfoort. De Tweede Wereldoorlog is een onderwerp dat erg leeft in onze samenleving en waar veel belangstelling voor is. Mijn grootouders hebben mij vele verhalen verteld over hun oorlogsherinneringen. De jonge generatie van tegenwoordig leert echter over de oorlog op andere manieren, waaronder in musea en herinneringscentra. Zij missen de persoonlijke verhalen van familieleden en hebben andere kanalen nodig om over deze gevoelige geschiedenis, die zoveel invloed heeft op de huidige maatschappij, te leren. Onderzoek naar educatie over de Tweede Wereldoorlog was een nieuwe ervaring voor mij. Ik had het voorrecht om tijdens mijn stage bij EUROCLIO mee te mogen werken aan het project ‘Multi-faceted memory’.1 Tijdens dit project heb ik veel geleerd wat betreft de omgang met een gevoelige geschiedenis en educatie over de gelaagde geschiedenis van voormalige concentratiekampen in Europa. Ik hoop met dit onderzoek een nieuw licht te werpen op de huidige omgang met het geweld van de Holocaust in educatieve programma’s in de voormalige concentratiekampen Westerbork, Vught en Amersfoort. Graag wil ik de medewerkers en de vrijwilligers van de herinneringscentra in Vught, Amersfoort en Westerbork bedanken voor hun behulpzaamheid en gastvrijheid. Zonder hen was dit onderzoek niet mogelijk geweest. Tevens wil ik mijn thesisbegeleidster Laurie Slegtenhorst en de professoren van de faculteit Erasmus School of History, Culture and Communication bedanken voor de colleges en de begeleiding. 1 European Association of History Educators (EUROCLIO), Programme Reflecting Remembrance. ‘Multi- faceted memory’: On-Site and Online Learning about Nazi and Stalinist Camps (2014-2015). 4 Ghislaine Kokshoorn 20 augustus 2015 5 1. Inleiding 1.1 Introductie Zeventig jaar na het einde van de Tweede Wereldoorlog speelt deze geschiedenis nog steeds een belangrijke rol in onze samenleving. De herinneringen aan de Tweede Wereldoorlog trekken sterker de aandacht dan andere periodes uit de geschiedenis. Dit is terug te zien in het aantal herdenkingen, film- en theatervoorstellingen en het stijgende aantal bezoekers in musea en herinneringscentra. De grote belangstelling voor de Tweede Wereldoorlog blijkt ook uit een publieksonderzoek van het Kenniscentrum Oorlogsbronnen in samenwerking met adviesbureau TNS NIPO (2015).2 Uit dit onderzoek naar de huidige belangstelling voor de Tweede Wereldoorlog en de manier waarop de bevolking zich laat informeren blijkt dat bijna de helft van de Nederlanders een interesse heeft voor de geschiedenis van de Tweede Wereldoorlog. Daarnaast vindt vijfentachtig procent deze geschiedenis voornamelijk relevant voor de naoorlogse generatie, deze kennis helpt hen namelijk de wereld van nu beter te begrijpen. Naast documentaires, films en familieverhalen is een bezoek aan historische plekken een belangrijke bron van informatie voor jongeren.3 Erfgoedplekken zijn een krachtige herinnering aan de historische gebeurtenissen van de Tweede Wereldoorlog. Een goed voorbeeld hiervan zijn de voormalige concentratiekampen en huidige herinneringscentra in Westerbork, Vught en Amersfoort. Er is grote belangstelling voor deze herinneringscentra. Herinneringscentrum Kamp Westerbork en Nationaal Monument Kamp Vught hadden
Recommended publications
  • International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance Marking 15 Years of the Stockholm Declaration 2000–2015
    International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance Marking 15 years of the Stockholm Declaration 2000–2015 MEMBER OBSERVER The cover image shows the ‘Wall of Portraits’, which forms part COUNTRIES COUNTRIES of the permanent exhibition at the Kazerne Dossin — Memorial, Museum and Documentation Centre on Holocaust and Human Rights in Mechelen, Belgium. The wall shows over 25,800 Contents Argentina (2002) Albania (2014) deportees and spans four floors of the museum. The pictures Austria (2001) Australia (2015) of those who survived are shown in color while the pictures of those who perished are shown in black and white. For many Belgium (2005) Bulgaria (2012) of the deportees, not even a picture remains. The Stockholm Canada (2009) El Salvador (2014) Declaration states, “Our commitment must be to remember Croatia (2005) The former Yugoslav the victims who perished, respect the survivors still with us, and reaffirm humanity’s common aspiration for mutual under- Czech Republic (2002) Republic of standing and justice.” Just as the Stockholm Declaration is Denmark (2004) Macedonia (2009) the IHRA’s founding document, so the persecutees form the core Estonia (2007) Moldova (2014) of IHRA’s mandate. It is therefore considered fitting that the victims and survivors, shown as individuals and not as a perse- Finland (2010) Monaco (2015) cuted mass, occupy such a prominent place in this publication. France (1999) Portugal (2009) Photo credit: © Christophe Ketels & Kazerne Dossin Germany (1998) Turkey (2008) Greece (2005) Uruguay (2013) Hungary (2002) Introduction
    [Show full text]
  • Holocaust Representations and the Testimony of Images
    WI BEY T NESS O TH REBECKA REBECKA ND THOR KA E TZ HOLOCAUST REPRESENTATION AND THE TESTIMONY OF IMAGES THREE FILMS BY YAEL HERSONSKI HARUN FAROCKI AND EYAL SIVAN WITNESS BEYOND BEYOND T REBECKA REBECKA H T KAT H E O Z R HOLOCAUST REPRESENTATION AND THE TESTIMONY OF IMAGES THREE FILMS BY YAEL HERSONSKI HARUN FAROCKI EYAL SIVAN FOR SAM AND ISIDOR PRELUDE 1–3 9–13 WHAT IS A WITNESS? 15–23 AN EVENT WITHOUT AN IMAGE 23–24 WHEN NO WITNESSES ARE LEFT 24–28 IMPOSSIBLE REPRESENTATIONS 28–31 IMAGE AS WITNESS 32–36 GESTIC THINKING 36–39 RESITUATED IMAGES AND THE QUESTION OF FRAME 39–43 STILL IMAGES 45-69 BRESLAUER AT WORK IN WESTERBORK, 1944. 45 A FILM UNFINISHED BY YAEL HERSONSKI 46–55 RESPITE BY HARUN FAROCKI 56–63 THE SPECIALIST BY EYAL SIVAN 64–69 ARCHIVAL WORK 71–72 THE STATUS OF ARCHIVAL IMAGES 73–76 ARCHIVAL STORIES 1: DAS GHETTO AND A FILM UNFINISHED 76–80 ARCHIVAL STORIES 2: THE WESTERBORK MATERIAL AND RESPITE 80–83 ARCHIVAL STORIES 3: RECORDING THE EICHMANN TRIAL AND THE SPECIALIST 84–86 5 STRUCTURING FRAMES 87–88 AGENCY AND ANALYSIS 88–91 THE HOW OF THE IMAGE 91–95 OVERCOMING AESTHETIC DISTANCE 96–99 TRUTHS IN NON-TRUSTWORTHY IMAGES 100–104 REFLEXIVITY AND EXPOSURE 104–107 VOICE, TEXT, AND NARRATION 109–110 VERBAL AND PICTORIAL WITNESSING 110–115 SOUNDS OF SILENCE AND COMMOTION 115–117 SHOWING INSTEAD OF TELLING 117–119 VISUALIZING TESTIMONY 120–123 THE PERPETRATOR AS WITNESS 125–126 THE NAZI GAZE 126–129 THE PERPETRATOR IN FOCUS 129–132 REMOVING THE WITNESS 132–137 HAPPY IMAGES OF THE CAMP 137–141 THE TESTIMONY OF IMAGES 143–144 TESTIMONY
    [Show full text]
  • Wandering Memories
    WANDERING MEMORIES MARGINALIZING AND REMEMBERING THE PORRAJMOS Research Master Thesis Comparative Literary Studies Talitha Hunnik August 2015 Utrecht University Thesis Supervisor: Dr. Susanne Knittel Second Reader: Prof. Dr. Ann Rigney CONTENTS Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................................. 3 A Note on Terminology ...................................................................................................................... 4 A Note on Translations ...................................................................................................................... 4 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 5 Antiziganism and the Porrajmos ................................................................................................. 8 Wandering Memories ................................................................................................................. 12 Marginalized Memories: Forgetting the Porrajmos ......................................................... 19 Cultural Memory Studies: Concepts and Gaps ........................................................................ 24 Walls of Secrecy ........................................................................................................................... 34 Remembering the Holocaust and Marginalizing the Porrajmos ........................................
    [Show full text]
  • 1942 Other Victims of Nazi Crimes Scenario
    OTHER VICTIMS subject OF NAZI CRIMES Context8. According to the Nazi ideology, Jews into two categories: ‘worthy’ individuals constituted the greatest threat to Ger- (enjoying full civic rights) and those man society and racial purity. For this rea- ‘useless’ not only denied equal rights, but son, their rights were gradually limited with primarily the right to live. isolation in designated areas after the war broke out. Then, they were murdered in death Several months after the Nazis gained power, camps and other murder sites. a law was enacted on 14 July 1933 ‘to prevent the birth of offspring with hereditary diseases’. However, Jews were not the only group persecuted Over time, that regulation was used to forcibly by the Nazis. Even before the Second World War sterilise people with mental illnesses and those had begun, they sought to ‘purify’ German society suffering from epilepsy, deafness, blindness and from all ‘racially different’ groups (to which Sinti physical deformities. That group also included and Roma belonged, alongside Jews), as well as alcohol addicts, who were subject forced persons with physical disabilities, mental-health sterilisation. According to estimates, between difficulties and ones considered to be anti-social. 200,000 and 380,000 persons underwent the The last-mentioned group included homosexuals treatment pursuant to that law by 1938. However, and prostitutes and, given their nomadic lifestyle, no attempts were made to murder them before Sinti and Roma. Political opponents (mainly the Second World War. A certain type of exception socialists and communists as well as various and impulse toward adopting such a decision later union and social activists opposed to the Nazis) in the autumn of 1939 was a certain Kretschmar constituted a separate category.
    [Show full text]
  • The Westerbork Film Revisited: Provenance, the Re-Use of Archive Material and Holocaust Remembrances
    Historical Journal of Film, Radio and Television ISSN: 0143-9685 (Print) 1465-3451 (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/chjf20 The Westerbork Film Revisited: Provenance, the Re-Use of Archive Material and Holocaust Remembrances Fabian Schmidt To cite this article: Fabian Schmidt (2020): The Westerbork Film Revisited: Provenance, the Re-Use of Archive Material and Holocaust Remembrances, Historical Journal of Film, Radio and Television, DOI: 10.1080/01439685.2020.1730033 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/01439685.2020.1730033 Published online: 29 Mar 2020. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 38 View related articles View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=chjf20 Historical Journal of Film, Radio and Television, 2020 https://doi.org/10.1080/01439685.2020.1730033 THE WESTERBORK FILM REVISITED: PROVENANCE, THE RE-USE OF ARCHIVE MATERIAL AND HOLOCAUST REMEMBRANCES Fabian Schmidt The Westerbork film has become an iconic piece of archive footage. It was granted world document heritage by UNESCO in 2017 and has been a subject in the periphery of the international academic debate on the relationship between archival footage and historical inquiry since Harun Farockis’ Respite (2007). Despite its status as one of the most important archive films of the Holocaust, there has been next to no critical research on the provenance of the material. In the course of my dissertation research, it has become clear that at least parts of the edition in circulation today– namely the subject of all written and filmic publications since the early 1990s – is not the original, but instead an altered, shortened form, most likely produced in a Dutch archive during the late 1980s with the intention to present the footage in ways attractive to potential buyers.
    [Show full text]
  • Teaching About and Commemorating the Roma and Sinti Genocide Practices Within the OSCE Area Teaching About and Commemorating the Roma and Sinti Genocide
    Teaching about and Commemorating the Roma and Sinti Genocide Practices within the OSCE Area Teaching about and Commemorating the Roma and Sinti Genocide Practices within the OSCE Area Published by the OSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights (ODIHR) Ul. Miodowa "# ##-$%" Warsaw Poland www.osce.org/odihr © OSCE/ODIHR $#"% All rights reserved. The contents of this publication may be freely used and copied for educational and other non-commercial purposes, provided that any such reproduction is accompanied by an acknowledgement of the OSCE/ ODIHR as the source. ISBN &'(-&$-&$)*-&"#-) The drawings on the cover of this publication are from the autobiography Sofia Z !"#", written by Gunilla Lundgren in co-operation with Sofia Taikon, a Roma genocide survivor whose family was sent to Auschwitz-Birkenau. The draw- ings are by Amanda Eriksson. The book was published by Bokförlaget Tranan in $##% in a bilingual edition, Swedish and Kalderash Romany. The translators to Romany were Zandra Brzezinska and Lars Demetri. In $#"$, Mantra Lingua published an English edition translated by Janna Eliot. In $#"%, this resource is being published by the NGO Folk Er Folk in their efforts to strengthen Roma rights and educate about the genocide. Designed by Homework Printed in Poland by Poligrafus Jacek Adamiak Table of Contents ' - . 56 . :; A country-by-country overview of teaching about the Roma and Sinti genocide $% . ': A country-by-country overview of the commemoration of the Roma and Sinti genocide %) 6= ". ODIHR Contact Point for Roma and Sinti Issues Questionnaire on Roma genocide Education and Commemoration 0& $. Bibliography and website sources provided by OSCE participating States in relation to the availability of teaching materials on the Roma and Sinti genocide '$ ).
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 1. a Holocaust in Trains (Introduction)
    – Chapter 1 – INTRODUCTION A Hidden Holocaust in Trains “Move over. Make room for the others!” We squeezed and crushed in as if we were animals. A man with only one leg cried out in agony and his horrifi ed wife pleaded with us not to press against him. We traveled in the dark crush for a long, long time. No air. No food. People urinating continuously in the latrines. Then the shriek. Over the moans and helpless little cries, there rose a piercing scream I shall never forget. From a woman on the fl oor beneath the small, barred window came the horrifying scream. She held her head in both her hands and then we who were close by saw the words scratched in tiny letters: “last transport went to Auschwitz.”1 When we were marched out to the cattle trains, you have a cattle train in the Washington museum, I never really knew what the dimensions were, nobody could tell me, it’s about three quarters the size of a regular tour bus … there were about 170 people packed into this cattle car. At fi rst some people wanted to pre- vent the panic, to tell people, “look people, organize, stand up, there is no room for everyone to sit” … but it didn’t work, people were in a panic, the young and strong were standing at the windows, blocking whatever air there was.2 Even today freight cars give me bad vibes. It is customary to call them cattle cars, as if the proper way to transport animals is by terrorizing and overcrowd- ing them.
    [Show full text]
  • Information Der Völkermord an Den Sinti Und Roma the Genocide of the Sinti and Roma
    Information Der Völkermord an den Sinti und Roma 9.9 The Genocide of the Sinti and Roma 2709 Sinto als Opfer medizinischer Versuche im KZ Dachau Sinto victim of medical experiments in the Dachau concentration US Holocaust Memorial Museum, Washington camp An Sinti und Roma wurden in mehreren Konzentrationslagern In many of the concentration camps, Sinti and Roma were misused medizinische Versuche durchgeführt, die große Leiden for medical experiments that caused tremendous suffering and verursachten oder tödlich endeten. death. 2706 Konzentrationslager oder Concentration camp or forced sterilization Zwangssterilisation One day I was ordered to report to the Gestapo Man bestellte mich eines Tages zu der Gestapo and was told that if I didn’t want to go to a con- und sagte mir, dass, wenn ich nicht in das KZ centration camp, I would have to be sterilized. wolle, ich mich sterilisieren lassen müsste. Es blieb I had no other choice than to submit to this pres- mir nichts anderes übrig, als mich diesem Zwang sure since even if I had preferred the camp, I 2707 Das Vernichtungslager Auschwitz-Birkenau mit dem „Zigeunerlager“ The extermination camp Auschwitz-Birkenau with the “gypsy camp” zu fügen, denn hätte ich es vorgezogen, in das would not have been spared there either. The Foto: Alliierte Luftaufnahme, 31. Mai 1944 Photo: Aerial photograph taken by the Allies, May 31, 1944 Luftbilddatenbank Ing. Büro Dr. Carls, Würzburg KZ zu gehen, dann wäre es mir auch dort nicht sterilization was carried out by Dr. St. in Munich. The “gypsy camp” was located in the area marked in red.
    [Show full text]
  • Workshop Report
    Ministry of Education and Culture Workshop Report European workshop The remembrance of the Holocaust and of the Roma Samudaripen Budapest, Hungary, from 31 July to 3 rd August 2008 The Ministry of Education and Culture - Hungary Council of Europe - Directorate General IV Directorate of School, Out-of School and Higher Education European Dimension of Education Division 1 European workshop The remembrance of the Holocaust and of the Roma Samudaripen Budapest, Hungary, from 31 July to 3 rd August 2008 Introduction and first day In the framework of the Projects “Teaching Remembrance: Education for the prevention of crimes against humanity” and “Education of Roma Children in Europe”, the Workshop “The Remembrance of the Holocaust and of the Roma Samudaripen”, was jointly organized by the Council of Europe in close cooperation with the Hungarian Ministry of Education and Culture. The workshop was held at the Council of Europe Youth Centre – Budapest. The Workshop was attended by 70 people from a large number of Member States and was composed of teachers, teacher trainers, ministry of education officials and other involved and interested players. The Workshop was led and informed by officials from the Hungarian Ministry of Education and Culture and the Council of Europe, and experts in the field of the Roma genocide. The Moderator for the opening session was Ms Yvonne Schuchmann who warmly welcomed all the Workshop participants and other visitors. She introduced Dr Carole Reich who formally greeted all the guests in the name of the Council of Europe and thanked the Hungarian Ministry of Education and Culture for acting as willing host to the Workshop and expressed her pleasure at welcoming everyone to the Budapest European Youth Centre of the Council of Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Exhibition 'Struikelsteentjes in Maastricht'
    Exhibition ‘Struikelsteentjes in Maastricht’ 13 April till 30 May 2016 City Hall Centre Céramique, Maastricht Introduction 350 Stumbling Stones for the Nazi victims of Maastricht During the Second World War, over 350 inhabitants of Maastricht were deported en murdered by the Nazi’s. A Stumbling Stone creates a lasting memory to these Maastricht Jews, Sinti and resistance fighters. Stumbling Stones are placed in the pavement right in front of the houses from which victims were deported. Up to today, one can find, 125 Stumbling Stones in and throughout Maastricht, all of them placed and financed by private individuals. Stumbling Stones facilitate the commemoration of victims of the Nazi regime on a local level. Those who were brutally taken from their homes now have a tangible monument of their own. But when searching for Stumbling Stones, what should you look for? Stumbling Stones are small, concrete bricks of 10 by 10 centimetres with a layer of brass on top, on which the personal details of Nazi victims – their names, their birth dates, and the time and place of their murders – are die-cut manually. Stumbling Stones tell us about the 1 victims of the Nazi ideology; those who were killed for being who they were – be their identity based on religion or on personal convictions. Characterized by its own unique inscription, each stone reveals an individual fate, allowing it to be publicly recognized. Public recognition This sense of recognition by a wider audience is essential. The suffering can never be made undone, but public recognition ensures that the relatives of the victims are now able to connect to the Jewish citizens and resistance fighters from whom they descend.
    [Show full text]
  • Gedenkstunde Des Deutschen Bundestages Am 27. Januar 2011
    Tag des Gedenkens an die Opfer des Nationalsozialismus Gedenkstunde des Deutschen Bundestages am 27. Januar 2011 Day of Remembrance for the Victims of National Socialism Ceremony of Remembrance at the German Bundestag on 27 January 2011 Day of Remembrance for the Victims of National Socialism Day of Remembrance for the Victims Tag des Gedenkens an die Opfer Nationalsozialismus Tag 2011 Tag des Gedenkens an die Opfer des Nationalsozialismus Gedenkstunde des Deutschen Bundestages am 27. Januar 2011 Laufzeit: 83 Minuten Herausgeber: Deutscher Bundestag, Referat Öffentlichkeitsarbeit © Deutscher Bundestag 2011, alle Rechte vorbehalten 4 Gedenkstunde 6 Begrüßung durch den Präsidenten des Deutschen Bundestages, Prof. Dr. Norbert Lammert 12 „Empathy“ Thema aus „Rhapsody Romanes Nr. 1“ Ferenc Snétberger, Gitarre 14 Rede von Zoni Weisz, Vertreter der Sinti und Roma 24 „Hallgató“ Variation zum 1. Satz des Konzerts „In Memory Of My People“ Ferenc Snétberger, Gitarre 26 Jugendbegegnung des Deutschen Bun- destages anlässlich des Gedenktags 28 Gemeinsam Zeugen sein – heute, morgen und für alle Zeit von Annemarie Niemann 34 Foto-Ausstellung „Garten der Erinnerung“ 42 Profile Eine DVD mit einem barrierefrei produ­ zierten Film befindet sich auf der letz­ ten Umschlagseite der Gedenkschrift. Inhalt Contents 44 Ceremony of Remembrance 46 Speech by Professor Norbert Lammert, Presi­ dent of the German Bundestag 52 “Empathy” Theme from “Rhapsody Romanes No. 1” Ferenc Snétberger, guitar 54 Speech by Zoni Weisz Representative of the Sinti und Roma 64 “Hallgató” Variation on the first movement of the concerto “In Memory Of My People” Ferenc Snétberger, guitar 66 Youth Encounter 68 Bearing witness – today, tomorrow and for the rest of time By Annemarie Niemann 74 Photo exhibition “Garden of Remembrance” 82 Profiles A DVD with a film accessible to those with disabilities can be found on the inside back cover.
    [Show full text]
  • HMD 2016: Don't Stand By
    Theme vision Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim. Silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented. Elie Wiesel Acceptance speech – The Nobel Peace Prize 1986 Legacy of HMD 2015 for HMD 2016 Our previous theme for HMD 2015 was reflective, looking back over the 70 years since the liberation of Auschwitz, and the 20 years since the Genocide in Srebrenica. To build on the legacy of HMD 2015, our theme this year will be forward-looking with a clear call to action in the present: focusing on the contemporary relevance of the Holocaust and subsequent genocides, and considering our individual responsibilities not to be bystanders to hate crime and prejudice, nor to international threats of genocide. We must ensure that the Holocaust, Nazi Persecution and subsequent genocides are not forgotten, trivialised or denied. Survivors, victims and refugees will remain at the centre of HMD; for many survivors, influencing behaviour today and relationships with others in our communities are crucial reasons for their commitment to speaking about their experiences. For some, the focus needs to be on individual acts of kindness that signify we will not turn a blind eye when those around us face prejudice or victimisation: We need to take into account the lives of other people who live around us. We need to look after each other. Kemal Pervanić For others, the focus is on more recent genocides: Unfortunately, genocide is happening again. People haven’t learnt. That won’t stop me pleading for tolerance. Otto Deutsch The central vision of Holocaust Memorial Day is to learn from the past in order to create a safer, better future.
    [Show full text]