Submission: Inquiry Into the Uranium Royalty (Northern Territory) Bill 2008

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Submission: Inquiry Into the Uranium Royalty (Northern Territory) Bill 2008

THE AUSTRALIAN NUCLEAR FREE ALLIANCE Formed in 1997, the Australian Nuclear Free Alliance (formerly the Alliance Against Uranium) brings together Aboriginal people and relevant NGO’s concerned about existing or proposed nuclear developments in Australia, particularly on Aboriginal homelands. The Alliance provides a forum for sharing of knowledge, skills and experience. It is an opportunity to come together and find strength through our shared aims to protect country and culture from nuclear developments. The Alliance helped to build the successful campaign to stop the Jabiluka uranium mine in the Northern Territory, and more recently, a proposed national nuclear waste dump in South Australia. Currently, Aboriginal communities face a wave of uranium exploration, several proposed new uranium mines, and a proposed national nuclear waste dump. Alliance Structure and Contacts The Alliance has a Committee with two co-chairs. A majority of the Committee members are Aboriginal people. Committee members are elected at the annual Alliance meeting. Kevin Buzzacott, an Arabunna elder from South Australia, is the honorary President of the Alliance. The Alliance also has a number of working groups which report to the Committee, they are: fundraising; media; international outreach and solidarity; speaking tour; 2009 meeting organising group; newsletter; water; education; website. Alliance Committee 2008-09 • Donna Jackson (Larrakia Nation) - co-chair - 61 (0)427 847186, <[email protected]> • Rebecca Bear-Wingfield (Kokatha) - co-Chair – 61 (0)411 518510, <[email protected]> • Jillian Marsh (Adnyamathanha) • Martha Watts (Kokatha) • Peter Watts (Kokatha) • Sue Coleman Haseldine (Kokatha Mula) • Nat Wasley (Arid Lands Environment Centre) • Dave Sweeney (Australian Conservation Foundation) • Steve Holdsworth (Friends of the Earth) Administration: Friends of the Earth (FoE) Melbourne administers funding for the Alliance. More information More information about the Alliance is posted at: <www.foe.org.au/anti- nuclear/issues/oz/alliance> or contact one of the co-chairs or committee members in your state or territory. .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

FPA Legislation Committee Tabled Docu~Ent No. \
FPA Legislation Committee Tabled Docu~ent No. \, By: Mr~ C'-tn~:S AOlSC, Date: b IV\a,c<J..-. J,od.D , e,. t\-40.M I ---------- - ~ -- Australian Government National IndigeJrums Australlfans Agency OFFICIAL Chief Executive Officer Ray Griggs AO, CSC Reference: EC20~000257 Senator Tim Ayres Labor Senator for New South Wales Deputy Chair, Senate Finance and Public Administration Committee 6 March 2020 Re: Additional Estimates 2019-2020 Dear Senatafyres ~l Thank you for your letter dated 25 February 2020 requesting information about Indigenous Advancement Strategy (IAS) and Aboriginals Benefit Account (ABA) grants and unsuccessful applications for the periods 1 January- 30 June 2019 and 1 July 2019 (Agency establishment) - 25 February 2020. The National Indigenous Australians Agency has prepared the attached information; due to reporting cycles, we have provided the requested information for the period 1 January 2019 - 31 January 2020. However we can provide the information for the additional period if required. As requested, assessment scores are provided for the merit-based grant rounds: NAIDOC and ABA. Assessment scores for NAIDOC and ABA are not comparable, as NAIDOC is scored out of 20 and ABA is scored out of 15. Please note as there were no NAIDOC or ABA grants/ unsuccessful applications between 1 July 2019 and 31 January 2020, Attachments Band D do not include assessment scores. Please also note the physical location of unsuccessful applicants has been included, while the service delivery locations is provided for funded grants. In relation to ABA grants, we have included the then Department's recommendations to the Minister, as requested.
[Show full text]
Rare Books Lib
RBTH 2239 RARE BOOKS LIB. S The University of Sydney Copyright and use of this thesis This thesis must be used in accordance with the provisions of the Copynght Act 1968. Reproduction of material protected by copyright may be an infringement of copyright and copyright owners may be entitled to take legal action against persons who infringe their copyright. Section 51 (2) of the Copyright Act permits an authorized officer of a university library or archives to provide a copy (by communication or otherwise) of an unpublished thesis kept in the library or archives, to a person who satisfies the authorized officer that he or she requires the reproduction for the purposes of research or study. The Copyright Act gran~s the creator of a work a number of moral rights, specifically the right of attribution, the right against false attribution and the right of integrity. You may infringe the author's moral rights if you: • fail to acknowledge the author of this thesis if you quote sections from the work • attribute this thesis to another author • subject this thesis to derogatory treatment which may prejudice the author's reputation For further information contact the University's Director of Copyright Services Telephone: 02 9351 2991 e-mail: [email protected] Camels, Ships and Trains: Translation Across the 'Indian Archipelago,' 1860- 1930 Samia Khatun A thesis submitted in fuUUment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of History, University of Sydney March 2012 I Abstract In this thesis I pose the questions: What if historians of the Australian region began to read materials that are not in English? What places become visible beyond the territorial definitions of British settler colony and 'White Australia'? What past geographies could we reconstruct through historical prose? From the 1860s there emerged a circuit of camels, ships and trains connecting Australian deserts to the Indian Ocean world and British Indian ports.
[Show full text]
PRG 1686 Series List Page 1 of 4 Sister Michele Madiga
_________________________________________________________________________ Sister Michele Madigan PRG 1686 Series List _________________________________________________________________________ Subject files relating to the campaign against the proposed radioactive 1 dump in South Australia. 1998-2004. 21.5 cm. Comprises subject files compiled by Michele Madigan: File 1: Environmentalists’ information and handouts File 2: Environmentalists’ information and handouts File 3: Greenpeace submission re radioactive wastes disposal File 4: Kupa Piti Kungka Tjuta (Coober Pedy Senior Aboriginal Women’s Council) campaign against radioactive dump papers File 5: Kupa Piti Kungka Tjuta – press clippings File 6: Coober Pedy town group campaign against a radioactive dump File 7: Postcards and printed material File 8: Michele Madigan’s personal correspondence against a radioactive dump File 9: SA Parliamentary proceedings against a radioactive dump File 10: Federal Government for a radioactive dump. File 11: Press cuttings. File 12: Brochures, blank petition forms and information, produced by various groups (Australian Conservation Foundation, Friends of the Earth, etc. Subject files relating to uranium mining (mainly in S.A.) 2 1996-2011. 10 cm. Comprises seven files which includes brochures, press clippings, emails, reports and newsletters. File 1 : Roxby Downs – Western Mining (WMC) / Olympic Dam File 2: Ardbunna elder, Kevin Buzzacott. File 3: Beverley and Honeymoon mines in South Australia. File 4: Background to uranium mining in Australia. File 5: Proposed expansion of Olympic Dam. File 6: Transportation of radioactive waste including across South Australia. File 7: Northern Territory traditional owners against Mukaty Dump proposal. PRG 1686 Series list Page 1 of 4 _________________________________________________________________________ Subject files relating to the British nuclear explosions at Maralinga 3 in the 1950s and 1960s.
[Show full text]
Indigenous Knowledge in the Built Environment a Guide for Tertiary Educators
Indigenous Knowledge in The Built Environment A Guide for Tertiary Educators David S Jones, Darryl Low Choy, Richard Tucker, Scott Heyes, Grant Revell & Susan Bird Support for the production of this publication has been 2018 provided by the Australian Government Department of Education and Training. The views expressed in this report do ISBN not necessarily reflect the views of the Australian Government 978-1-76051-164-7 [PRINT], Department of Education and Training. 978-1-76051-165-4 [PDF], With the exception of the Commonwealth Coat of Arms, and 978-1-76051-166-1 [DOCX] where otherwise noted, all material presented in this document is provided under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 Citation: International License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ Jones, DS, D Low Choy, R Tucker, SA Heyes, G Revell & S Bird by-sa/4.0/ (2018), Indigenous Knowledge in the Built Environment: A Guide The details of the relevant licence conditions are available on for Tertiary Educators. Canberra, ACT: Australian Government the Creative Commons website (accessible using the links Department of Education and Training. provided) as is the full legal code for the Creative Commons Attribution- ShareAlike 4.0 International License http:// Warning: creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/legalcode Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander readers are warned that the following document may contain images and names of Requests and inquiries concerning these rights should be deceased persons. addressed to: Office for Learning and Teaching A Note on the Project’s Peer Review Process: Department of Education The content of this teaching guide has been independently GPO Box 9880, peer reviewed by five Australian academics that specialise Location code N255EL10 in the teaching of Indigenous knowledge systems within the Sydney NSW 2001 built environment professions, two of which are Aboriginal [email protected] academics and practitioners.
[Show full text]
Editorial: Law, Race and Whiteness
ACRAWSA e-journal, Vol. 4, No. 2, 2008 EDITORIAL: LAW, RACE AND WHITENESS TRISH LUKER & JENNIFER NIELSEN We acknowledge the sovereignty of peoples’ position in relation to their the many Indigenous Nations of society’s colonial past (see Moreton- Australia, and pay our respects to Robinson 2004a: viii). their ancestors, Elders and peoples— of the past, present and future. By contrast, in Australia, Irene Watson and Aileen Moreton-Robinson have led The contributions to this special issue of the field in interrogating and the ACRAWSA e-journal critically deconstructing the function of whiteness interrogate the interface of Anglo- in Anglo-Australian law and its disavowal Australian law and legal systems, race of Indigenous sovereignty. Their and whiteness. They seek to expose the scholarship is positioned within racialisation of legal discourse and call Indigenous epistemology and ontology, into question the normative white and draws on critical whiteness theory to subject of Anglo-Australian law. Anglo- expose the hegemony of whiteness Australian law obscures the hegemonic within Anglo-Australian legal discursive function of whiteness through its liberal and institutional practices. Watson has claims to neutrality, objectivity and engaged in a sustained critique of the rationality, and the promotion of formal, contemporary colonialism of white rather than substantive, equality. As in sovereignty, a ‘sovereignty of violence, other discursive domains, whiteness not of law that is always known’ (2002: operates within law as the invisible norm 257), which has introduced Australian by which an originary and unquestioned legal scholarship to new conversations legitimacy is claimed. involving decolonisation, a process of dissolving and thinking outside law’s Groundbreaking work drawing on imposed regimes of white colonial critical whiteness studies has highlighted thought (Watson 1998: 31).
[Show full text]
Fire Creator for Justice Is Awoken Eleanor Gilbert
FIRE CREATOR FOR JUSTICE IS AWOKEN ELEANOR GILBERT The international spotlight once again focused on the Aboriginal Tent Embassy in Canberra when, on 25 January 1999, the Daily Telegraph ran a lead story: Not in Our Front Yard revealing that Ian MacDonald, Minister for Territories, had introduced a 1932 trespass ordinance to remove the caravans, tents and dwellings. Even though the Tent Embassy has been registered on the National Estate by the Australian Heritage Commission since 1995 as a ‘living site...a dynamic site which is continually evolving and changing to cater to the needs of the Aboriginal people who visit and live there’ it is under constant threat of removal. Isobel Coe, Wiradjuri, explains to a press conference, ‘Our Embassy is the longest running protest site in the country. This is representative of how our people have to live in our own country - and this, I might add, is a lot better than how a lot of people have to live. They don't have access to basic necessities like water. That humpy represents the first house ever in the whole world. Our Fire represents the first ceremony ever in the whole world….You’ve got a flame that’s going all around the world, an Olympic Flame that started, that grew out of, this Fire Ceremony.’ Events at the Tent Embassy bring into sharp relief the contradiction between the essence and purpose of the Embassy and the misinformation distributed by, both, the government's propaganda machine and the biased mainstream media in this country. Anyone who participated in the annual Corroboree for Sovereignty on 26 January 1999 knows that what transpired on this day was a powerful healing process ‘to make peace amongst the people and mainly to make peace for our Country.’ Arabunna Elder, Uncle Kevin Buzzacott, who has Fire and Water dreaming, alludes to the depths of the healing ceremony as he talks to a circle of international visitors, who gather at the Fire, which has been burning for a whole year.
[Show full text]
Raw Law: the Coming of the Muldarbi
oFf r-rE u,\l7 LAW LIBRARY --l tlb.2reS ) tß,2 \ Raw Law: The Coming of the Muldarbi and the Path to its Demise Irene Margaret Watson In writing this thesis I have engaged in a personal struggle to decolonise myself, so it is written in a style which is part of that ongoing process of decolonisation, it is a writing of a song that still sings within. A song circles, so does the written form it does not always follow the rules of grammar or 'normal' academic structute, although I would argue the ideas and arguments are there, they are just positioned differently. A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy of the University of Adelaide In the Faculty of Law June L999 This work contains no material which has been accepted for the award of any other degree or diploma in any university or other tertiary institution and, to the best of my knowledge and belief, contains no material previously published or written by another person, except where due reference has been made in the text. The thesis includes parts of the following articles, which were written solely by me during the period of the candidature: 'The Power of Muldarbi and the road to its demise', (1,998) 1l Australian Feminist Law Journal 28 'Naked people's rules and regulations', (1998) 4 Law Text and Culture I 'Ways: 'Indigenous Peoples' Law survival against the colonial state, (1997) 8 The Australian Feminist Law Journal39 I have also submitted the following article and at the time of writing I was still awaiting the referees report, 'Kaldowinyeri' (L999) 3 Flinders Journal of Law Reþrm.
[Show full text]
The Scale Politics of Reconciliation: from the Political and the Personal to Geographical Scale
1) INTRODUCTION 1.1: Preamble Indigenous affairs policies in Australia’s colonial and “post-colonial” phases have been concentrated mainly around the twin issues of constructing an Australian national identity and maintaining capitalist systems of resource exploitation, rather than addressing issues of Indigenous rights or political equality between Indigenous peoples and Australian governments. For example, commitments made by federal governments to Aboriginal rights in land from the 1960s to the 1980s have been defeated or seriously diminished by political influence from the pastoral and minerals and energy sectors1. Throughout, conservative interests have been served by representations of land rights and Indigenous political associations as being a threat to Australian national unity and identity2. When the idea of reconciliation became a foundation for Indigenous affairs policy in 1990 it represented an effort to broaden previous policy parameters. One of the major three objectives of the policy, as formulated by its architect Robert Tickner (the Minister for Aboriginal Affairs in the Hawke Labor Government from 1990 to 1996) was to establish whether “any document of reconciliation would benefit the Australian community as a whole” and if so, “to make recommendations to the Minister on its nature and content” (Council for Aboriginal Reconciliation, 1993:12). This was an attempt to move from a narrow legislative framework to a more open- ended process of negotiating frameworks of reference between Indigenous leadership, politicians and other sectors. Another objective—a public education program on Australia’s history and social justice issues—was aimed in part, at generating popular inquiry concerning the need for these new processes.
[Show full text]
South Australian Government Boards and Committees Information As at 30 June 2018
16 October 2018 South Australian Government Boards and Committees Information As at 30 June 2018 Public-I1-A1 South Australian Government Boards and Committees As at 30 June 2018 Introduction This is the 21st annual report to Parliament of consolidated South Australian Government board and committee information. The report sets out the membership and remuneration arrangements of 192 part-time government boards and committees as at 30 June 2018 in order of ministerial portfolio. The information has been sourced from the Boards and Committees Information System (BCIS), a database administered by the Department of the Premier and Cabinet, following extensive consultation with all ministerial offices and stakeholder agencies. Definition of boards and committees in the report The boards and committees included in this report are those which are: • established by or under an Act of Parliament of South Australia (generally excluding the Local Government Act 1999) and have a majority of members appointed by either a minister or the Governor; or • established by a minister or legal instrument such as a constitution or charter, have a majority of members appointed by a minister, and have at least one member in receipt of remuneration. The report should not be considered to be a complete listing of all government boards and committees. Page 2 of 8 Public-I1-A1 Number of boards and committees 192 boards and committees are identified in the 2018 report. This is a reduction of 8 when compared with the 2017 report. Portfolios with the greatest number of boards and committees are Minister for Environment and Water (49), Premier (25) and Minister for Health and Wellbeing (21).
[Show full text]
CRC for Aboriginal Health Annual Report 0809
CRC for Aboriginal Health Annual Report 0809 Established and supported under the Australian Government’s Cooperative Research Centres Programme. The Cooperative Research Centre for Aboriginal Health (CRCAH) is a public good research Whale Dreaming centre funded through the Commonwealth Government’s Cooperative Research Centres © Y. Bundle 2007 Programme, its 12 core partners and external bodies. The CRCAH brings together eight universities or research institutions, four industry partners and six associated partners. The This work arose from a dream Yaraan received. Menzies School of Health Research (MSHR) is the Centre host. MSHR provides centre agent It is about the Whale Dreaming songline services and accommodation for the secretariat and executive of the CRCAH. connected to Keerray Woorroong Country along the coast near Warrnambool. Vision In her dream the Old People told Yaraan the Sustained improvements in Aboriginal health through strategic research and development. story of the Southern Right Whale and their journey to our waters to give birth to their young. They told her the secret of the whales and the Mission statement knowledge they bring. With strong and effective Aboriginal input and control, we will conduct high-quality strategic This work tells their story. Aboriginal health research, and we will engage in effective development activities with Aboriginal communities, service providers, policy formulators and decision-makers. Yaraan Bundle Yaraan Bundle is a Keerray Woorroong/ Objectives, principles and values Gunditjmara woman living in her homelands This Centre has a commitment to research which will lead to improved health outcomes in the Western Districts of Victoria, Gunditjmara for Indigenous Australians, and to stakeholder involvement and partnerships in research to Country.
[Show full text]
Statements from Aboriginal Traditional Owners Regarding the Plan to Import High-Level Nuclear Waste to South Australia
Statements from Aboriginal Traditional Owners regarding the plan to import high-level nuclear waste to South Australia October 2016 www.anfa.org.au/traditional-owners-statements ---------------- Irati Wanti, Vasinyi / 'The Poison – Leave It' Port Augusta – September 3, 2016 South Australian Anangu and Yura (Aboriginal Traditional Owners) call on the Citizens Jury to reject the plan to turn our homelands into stores and dumps for international high-level nuclear waste. The nuclear industry has a track record of Aboriginal dispossession and environmental pollution − from the atomic bomb tests to uranium mining to nuclear waste dump proposals. The government says the nuclear waste dump proposal is different to the atomic bomb tests, but Inaadi vasinyi − radiation is radiation, poison is poison. Governments stripped Aboriginal people of land, land rights and heritage protections for atomic bomb tests and uranium mining, and exactly the same thing will happen with the high-level nuclear waste dump. Aboriginal Traditional Owners have first-hand experience. Poisoned water, poisoned plants, poisoned animals, poisoned people. To this day Traditional Owners wear the scars and hurt and pain but still continue to tell their stories. We take responsibility to share our muda, tjukurpa, wapar (ancestral stories) and insist that you also respect our songlines. We've seen this happen too many times before. In the past we had no voice but today we have a voice and must be listened to. Then, we had no rights. Now we have rights and those rights must be respected. We will oppose this dangerous matter and will not allow our sacred land to be sacrificed for a nuclear waste dump.
[Show full text]
Aboriginal History Journal: Volume 25
Aboriginal History Volume 25 2001 Aboriginal History Incorporated The Committee of Management and the Editorial Board Peter Read (Chair), Rob Paton (Secretary), Peter Grimshaw (Treasurer/Public Officer), Richard Baker, Gordon Briscoe, Ann Curthoys, Brian Egloff, Julie Finlayson, Geoff Gray, Niel Gunson, Luise Hercus, David Johnston, Harold Koch, Isabel McBryde, Ingereth Macfarlane, Francis Peters-Little, Deborah Bird Rose, Gary Shipp, Ian Howie-Willis, Elspeth Young. Correspondents Jeremy Beckett, Valerie Chapman, Ian Clark, Eve Fesl, Fay Gale, Ronald Lampert, Campbell Macknight, Ewan Morris, John Mulvaney, Andrew Markus, Bob Reece, Henry Reynolds, Lyndall Ryan, Bruce Shaw, Tom Stannage, Robert Tonkinson, James Urry. Aboriginal History is a refereed journal that aims to present articles and information in the field of Australian ethnohistory, particularly in the post-contact history of the Aborigines and Torres Strait Islanders. Historical studies based on anthropological, archaeological, linguistic and sociological research, including comparative studies of other ethnic groups such as Pacific Islanders in Australia, will be welcomed. Issues include recorded oral traditions and biographies, narratives in local languages with translations, previously unpublished manuscript accounts, resumés of current events, archival and bibliographic articles, and book reviews. This volume of the journal is formally dated 2001, but is published in 2002. Aboriginal History is administered by an Editorial Board which is responsible for all unsigned material in the journal. Views and opinions expressed by the authors of signed articles and reviews are not necessarily shared by Board members. The editors invite authors to submit contributions to either the journal or monograph series for consideration; reviews will be commissioned by the reviews editor.
[Show full text]