<<

Meeting new challenges in food science technology: the development of complex approach for food and biobased research Hugo de Vries, Monique Axelos, Pascale Sarni-Manchado, Michael O’Donohue

To cite this version:

Hugo de Vries, Monique Axelos, Pascale Sarni-Manchado, Michael O’Donohue. Meeting new chal- lenges in food science technology: the development of complex systems approach for food and biobased research. Innovative Food Science and Emerging Technologies, Elsevier, 2018, 46, pp.1-6. ￿10.1016/j.ifset.2018.04.004￿. ￿hal-01837847￿

HAL Id: hal-01837847 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01837847 Submitted on 26 May 2020

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés.

Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution| 4.0 International License Version postprint research. Innovative Food Science andEmerging Technologies, 46,1-6. ,DOI :10.1016/j.ifset.2018.04.004 de Vries, H.,Axelos,M., Sarni-Manchado, P.,O'Donohue, M.(2018). Meetingnew challengesin food science technology: thedevelopment ofcomplex systemsapproach forfood andbiobased journal pertain. be it manuscript a This appropriate. Innfoo(2018),doi: for development Michael Please T Reference: DOI: PII: Michael O'Donohue Hugo research development Meeting Accepted Manuscript o appearin: is service discovered the published is de cite corresponding a PDF O'Donohue to new V will this ries, our of of in which file under complex challenges complex article customers its Monique of Comment citer cedocument: final Innovative FoodScienceandEmer INNFOO 1965 doi: S1466-8564(18)30422-3 could go an author , as: copyediting, 10.1016/j.ifset.2018.04.004 unedited systems Meeting form. systems Hugo af we in Axelos, fect was 10.1016/j.ifset.2018.04.004

Please are food approach the de approach manuscript captured new providing typesetting, V content, note Pascale science ries, challenges for that as for Monique that this food and af Sarni-Manchado, food during technology: filiation and has early all and and in review legal Axelos, been the ging T biobased food version for biobased production disclaimers accepted of all echnologies the Pascale science the authors. of research. resulting the for process Sarni-Manchado, that technology: manuscript. Please publication. proof apply The errors check address before to may The the the As if Version postprint research. Innovative Food Science andEmerging Technologies, 46,1-6. ,DOI :10.1016/j.ifset.2018.04.004 de Vries, H.,Axelos,M., Sarni-Manchado, P.,O'Donohue, M.(2018). Meetingnew challengesin food science technology: thedevelopment ofcomplex systemsapproach forfood andbiobased ht bst ad urtoa iscrt ae ocret n 21 in concurrent are insecurity S nutritional and obesity that but populations, among example, For dimensions. ethical and cultural social, other by course, Of faces. currently world the W impactsnegativeproduces products organisms i production their that recognize (i.e. bioresources Regarding recycl Introduction Special Issue. agenda phenomena) (emerging context) heterogeneous (environmental with dealing end deviseto dev macromolecules, (molecules, entities functional in more knowledge challenges, renewal Current Abstract Géraudière BP 71627, 44 Nantes 316 Cedex France3, 5 4 3 2 France 1 * Division Scienceof for Food and Bioproduct systemsHugoVries de complex of development the technology: science approach food in challenges new Meeting

UMR SPO,UMR imultaneous Corresponding authors: LISBP, UMR792,LISBP, INRA, 31400, INRA ParisSiège147 rue del'Université 75338 IATE,UMR CIRAD, INRA, MontpellierSupAgro iiin f cec fr od n Bordc Engineering, Bioproduct and Food for Science of Division hen elopment of new transformation technologies. These must provide the provide must These technologies. transformation new of elopment - sr products user ing is a wise strategy wise a is ing taken together, these together, taken

, hereby utilizing the knowledge that we have gained in the past decade and described in described and decade past the in gainedhave we that knowledge the utilizing hereby ,

It is It

- : s

et, utsae hrceiain f bioresource of characterization multiscale depth,

f u cletv vso of vision collective our of cea calne and challenges ocietal specific for food and biobased research. . itineraries - Beyond these fundamental considerations,fundamental these Beyond intensive framework for fu for framework intensive INRA, Montpellier SupAgro, U. Montpellier, 2 PlaceViala, 34060 Montpellier,France t biu that obvious it

vital

ly, 1 * , Monique Axelos

the transformations to recall that recall to ACCEPTED should We . MANUSCRIPT

ie in rise ( rm rmr boas rdcin o rai wse recycling waste organic to production biomass primary from ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT , etc. , its quality is also is quality its hugo.de Comment citer cedocument: non , , such , , it is inevitably imperfect inevitably is it ,

urn rdcins apoce i fo sine ut ie way give must science food in approaches reductionist current ol pplto is population world Accordingly sobering rai mte poue by produced matter organic

Toulouse, - all of the of all thus ier behaviour linear 2 as recent - , Pascale , product [email protected] using s greenhousegas

iie b te sunlight the by limited consider od cec ad technology. and science food all of of all

nction facts minimal minimal nweg acquisition knowledge , France

Earth’s resources are intrinsically finite intrinsically are resources Earth’s

Sarni we variable

these fundamen these Engineering, INRA matrices begin to unveil to begin - driven research and innovation. This implies This innovation. and research driven propose a propose , U. Montpellier, 2 f

- and ood P

Manchado aris energyand water

(FAO, 2013) (FAO, copne b wdsra urbanization widespread by accompanied pae changes) (phase [email protected] emissions or the generation of generationof the emissions or auatrn as manufacturing

substructures

C

(i.e. it is impossible to recycle 100% of atoms) of 100% recycle to impossible is it (i.e. edex

it is evident that evident is it (agents)

new 3

s, ,5 07 tal physical constraints are constraints physical tal photosynthesis the , Michael O’Donohue, Michael - , FRANCE ete NA as e or, u d la de Rue Loire, de Pays INRA Centre edn t te eald ecito of description detailed the to leading research , France atrn cpct of capacity capturing not only only not cagn processing changing , .

now considerable societal challenge societal considerable Consequently, i Consequently, PlaceViala, 34060 Montpellier, st

inputs n asmle etc assemblies and etr societies century novel , provide the conditions for for conditions the provide o et nraigy complex increasingly meet To

a methodology is every complex ,

food unequally distributed unequally food andthe generate ) , underpinning knowledge underpinning

t s lo motn to important also is it step in bioresource in step functional

t has been observed been has t

4 and that and ,5 toxic *

and photosynthetic

FO 2015) (FAO, compounded compounds. ) . )

s innovation

a need for need a conditions properties

inevitably problem although n the and targeted Two .

to that this - the to a - . . ,

Version postprint research. Innovative Food Science andEmerging Technologies, 46,1-6. ,DOI :10.1016/j.ifset.2018.04.004 de Vries, H.,Axelos,M., Sarni-Manchado, P.,O'Donohue, M.(2018). Meetingnew challengesin food science technology: thedevelopment ofcomplex systemsapproach forfood andbiobased equal the only focus the are importance,for of treated sake two former herein 2 that can be derived it from products the of nature the imply not does and neutral conveniently is bioresource term The process. photosynthetic 1 new planet’s the exploitation of and securityi all its resources fairfood for alternatively feed multiple resourcesinto specific multi itineraries resources) food 2013) Kautto, resources biological renewable from derived are energy and chemicals materials, of to way give must 1987) WCED, 2011; SCAR, 2015; Stevance, & Visbeck, Nakicenovic, Lu, of tenets the with keepingin cycles, production r regenerate to (biocapacity capacity Earth’s with footprint) (ecological consumption yearly total humanity’s comparing by calculated is day overshoot Earth authorizationo the with2017 to from1969 dayovershoot Earth Fig. 1. non food balanced conundrum resources in alterations profound are this of consequences

Even though Even Bioresources - T food items integrative systemicor o develop a bioeconomy while applying boundary conditions that will ensure the sustainable the ensure will that conditions boundary applying while bioeconomy a develop o

To meet both objectives, both meet To for energy, chemicals and materials production materials and chemicals energy, for ht il deliver will that : the world population world the :

). i t is recognized that recognized is t are defined as all renewable matter derived directly (e.g. plant biomass) or indirectly from the the from indirectly or biomass) plant (e.g. directly derived matter renewable all as defined are .

,

To estab To while that will offset

ed to needs a

ACCEPTEDbio MANUSCRIPT also

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT e lish a bioeconomy, a lish conomy. This conomy. Comment citer cedocument: mobilizing agricultural and forest resources for the production of biobased of productionthe for resources forest and agricultural mobilizing e reappraised be knowledge concerning

utpe rdcs o mlil proe fo snl resou single from purposes multiple for products multiple physico current requirementsfor

biomass requires a requires - chemical, technical, chemical, can be defined as an economy in which the basic components basic the which in economy an as defined be can

must be produced be must

the

and

sufficiently p sufficiently categorization of bioresources of categorization

sustainability e concepts new :

eating socio nwbe aua rsucs n ht year that in resources natural enewable - productvalue chains.

fossil resources - economic and environmental considerations environmental and economic lentiful and lentiful a with faced is humanity Consequently, . habits in a way that does not comprise future comprise not does that way a in (ETP

r rqie to required are f - Global Footprint(2017).NetworkGlobal EPSO, 2011; INRA 2011; EPSO, and nhabitants

stable ;far a from easy task increased reliance on on reliance increased and ,

1 supply

h cret economy current the (i.e. 2 ,

it is vital to acquire to vital it is enet technical reinvent as

of nutritionally of & CIRAD, 2009; CIRAD, & (McCormick & (McCormick food and non and food cs or rces, ( Fig. 1.

fossil are of of are ) - . -

Version postprint research. Innovative Food Science andEmerging Technologies, 46,1-6. ,DOI :10.1016/j.ifset.2018.04.004 de Vries, H.,Axelos,M., Sarni-Manchado, P.,O'Donohue, M.(2018). Meetingnew challengesin food science technology: thedevelopment ofcomplex systemsapproach forfood andbiobased http://www.santafe.edu/ 3 of system undefined form properties bulk to molecules and atoms individual of statisticalphysicsand on mechanics of description 1995) Kauffman, 1998; (Holland, T A core efficient integration mechanisms of understanding ambition this achieve performed increasingly multi A and technology, with a renewed Consequently, products and processes future displaying smart, of definition the for driver multiscal from product the approach systems a in Likewise, (composition products complex paradigms. systems A systems appro Consequently

The Santa hermodynamic

eei cmlx ytm approach systems complex generic interactions (4) (3) (2) (1) , ple hs prah a be can approach this , new,

h cr o the of core The their final their behaviour under changing (extreme) the (bio products of nature the transformation itineraries. e

products Fé

agt ucinlte that functionalities target understanding

and modellingand approaches Instead of breaking of Instead by institute for complexinstitute for systemsbuilt in areputation yet has past the in however not 25 years, food: approach m demonstrating i i nihr snl can prah o a netwo a nor approach, chain single a neither is it , bio that

ach.

a ethodology between those food science and technology moves into a new era of food and bioresource science bioresource and food of era new a into moves technology and science food INRA - s bioresource )diversity , resources

has already been applied to define to applied been already has

functional constituents

a nt e be developed been yet not has oh the both

ACCEPTEDunderpin MANUSCRIPT

n its and

Te ifrn eape ilsrt hw eerhr are researchers how illustrate examples different The . ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT o the for eeal rsucs wehr n h fr o fesok r manufactured or feedstock of form the in whether resources, renewable Comment citer cedocument:

of these f h ntr ad iest o aalbe bioresources available of diversity and nature the of at the at edge of and order chaos is no longer the starting point for product manufacture.product for point starting the longer no is proposed

-

conf t f its based complex based rsne a presented partners opstoa and compositional that characterize

hs . this

(e.g. atoms, molecules, organisms etc organisms molecules,atoms, (e.g. down use of of use

mission to easib igurations - ,

will

driven flexible , hs this thus

can

r tioe to tailored are and then reassembling then and ility

can etr ufl the fulfil better eiiin f picpl au can ht eies primary a delivers that chain value principal a of definition is ehdlg cnit of consists methodology o te s of use the for bio provide ageneralprovideframework

a hroyai po ( plot thermodynamic a s rvdn bsc nweg and knowledge basic providing approach . transformation technologies that deliver multiple products multiple deliver that technologiestransformation provide

eore is resources unravel the related to theiruses,potential reuses and final disposal. n hs pca ise f I of issue special this In

per t be to appears the system

Waga, 2009) (Wrangham, They

environmental or tutrl opeiy f bioresource of complexity structural the , rdc mnfcue s functionality is manufacture product ), . In particular, t particular, In .

other complex systems (biology, economics, (biology, systems complex other ifrn u different bas richness natur of multi Pioie Stengers & (Prigogine also also oa ad global and local quite

is .

a for the conception the of for l bio ple appropriate n lutae o cmiig k combining how illustrate bi obased different ses.

kapoc,bt oe complex a more but approach, rk hermodynamic approaches based approacheshermodynamic cmlx system complex a i. 2. Fig. resources new .

. n hs a, t s xetd that expected is it way, this In ) However, ST w so hw research how show we FSET, to correlatethe

is correlated with the number the with correlated is building blocks building al

process

) rm current from resources.

new demands

n hc the which on starting 1985 , o te rdcin of production the for

proces scien - related

new eoe te key the becomes

acquiring

Instead, )

point . ii progress tific

of of microstructure

In concepts s (bio)resource to create to s

reductionist conditions humankind its s

ubr of number approach , o build to

nowledge

in n the and

simplest - deeper driven. - depth new

.

to .. , is 3 a

- : . .

Version postprint research. Innovative Food Science andEmerging Technologies, 46,1-6. ,DOI :10.1016/j.ifset.2018.04.004 de Vries, H.,Axelos,M., Sarni-Manchado, P.,O'Donohue, M.(2018). Meetingnew challengesin food science technology: thedevelopment ofcomplex systemsapproach forfood andbiobased described as several discretesteps: bioresource a methodology of development the advance To requirements to possible be should it way, this matrices and/or molecules, simple than rather might mechanical, (e.g. on guidelines changingon processing conditions). molecule target a of production conta (e.g. function stable a maintaining consortiadynamicmicrobial to applied be can model this systems, a through transit to need the without adapt and dynamic highly are systems melting interactions. and constituents of numbers higher with second The stable and adaptable melting zone to systems complex allows approach thermodynamic a concept: proposed The Fig. 2. ining starch,proteins and lipids ,

involve

orderly) sn the Using plot, this In

oe wih s located is which zone, that can be readily undone, for example to promote to example for undone, readily be can that oe describes zone

. how to how must be implemented be must

the use of use the

that are favoured by favoured are that electromagnetic, thermodynamicelectromagnetic, hroyai plot thermodynamic

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPTzones three steer ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Comment citer cedocument: advanced processes

hoi bhvor sprrtcl hgl unstable highly (supercritical, behaviour chaotic

can be identified be can t the at define

fractionation

( that can be used to generatethat canused be to different food products th Fig. 3. Fig. either the

ch rough the melting zone, selecting appropriateselecting zone, meltingthe rough

nefc between interface able aotic regime. aotic s cneta tool conceptual a as more efficient, more structuration of of structuration

adapted from adapted moderate numbers of constituents and constituents of numbers moderate

o hnig niomns Nw rpris emerge properties New environments. changing to . The first The . methods that furnish that methods - ae cmlx ytm approach systems complex based , bio , - In the context of of context the In chemical, chemical etc chemical chemical, The targeted method targeted functional building blocks into blocks building functional de Vries, 2017) Vries, de describes

re and order third

food i sol b psil to possible be should it , n sals area smallest and that change in composition inchange that

digestion highly static phases (subcritical,phases static highly

chaos. functional ) bioresource , .

s This methodology can be can methodology This r fo rw material raw food a or

that meet sustainability meet that or efficient recycling efficient or ) epcal associated especially , . ) to achieve this achieve to ) n the In reach

complex /or -

based complex based ersns the represents external forcesexternal , etn zone melting

the dynamic the multi a interactions

new stable new depending

fractions provide ,

while . - step This .

In , . Version postprint research. Innovative Food Science andEmerging Technologies, 46,1-6. ,DOI :10.1016/j.ifset.2018.04.004 de Vries, H.,Axelos,M., Sarni-Manchado, P.,O'Donohue, M.(2018). Meetingnew challengesin food science technology: thedevelopment ofcomplex systemsapproach forfood andbiobased becomes apparent. developmentThe an approachsystemic a for need the thus and complexity system step, third this At losses. limit and use bioresource optimize to deployed be can approaches cascade and economy circular where is scale v is This scales. local understandingof an and physical limits account into taking 3. thefor next step. data differentrepresentinganalysingand management knowledge be must observatories These at health) scales. on different effects (e.g. impacts various environment measure and the processes), cascade in in especially changes impacts, minor (i.e. effects butterfly of consequences non properties, emergent detect to means the provide should pr distribution, production, including states various account into taking grave’, the to ‘cradle the from chain, value 2. firstnecessities to luxury products). and trends current etc), sustainability requirements, nutritional and safety environmental, acceptability, taking functionalities), required (i.e. purposes 1. Vries, 2017. “ as system food The Fig. 3.

existing

Assemble non to observatories Create non and food which identifying aims, define Carefully

knowledge. This critical step provides a framework to analyse and prioritize needs prioritizeand analyse to framework a provides step critical Thisknowledge. oduct manufacture, use (i.e. consumption in the case of food) of case the inconsumption (i.e. use manufacture, oduct

the system constituents, relating global relating constituents, system the ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT intelligently ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Comment citer cedocument: -

aiae co navigated - nrsvl mntr bioresource monitor intrusively

d deploymentof thisconstitutes the step 4.

sources. In this way, observatories will provide informationwill provide observatories way, this In sources.

into account the different boundary conditions (social conditions boundary different the account into mplex adaptive - scale food demands and non and demands food scale - food products are required for which for required are products food - linear interactions, fractals and even and fractals interactions, linear

ytm (INCAS) system - ae sses l aog their along all systems based - rvn cletn, linking, collecting, driven,

and re and

ht a hv huge have may that ital because the local the italbecause , dpe from adapted

- use

- . Monitoring . food needs, food (from

de Version postprint research. Innovative Food Science andEmerging Technologies, 46,1-6. ,DOI :10.1016/j.ifset.2018.04.004 de Vries, H.,Axelos,M., Sarni-Manchado, P.,O'Donohue, M.(2018). Meetingnew challengesin food science technology: thedevelopment ofcomplex systemsapproach forfood andbiobased the earlier mentioned As several locations and at appropriate risks chemicaland papers Other mechanisms closing loop include will that chains value future envisaged of complexity the to compared because ch different of set third A such methods can how illustrating discussed, is sourcesheterogeneous from data manage and integrate to intelligence (on collection data links and synchrot France’s characterize bioresourcesis illustrated also as such instruments, powerful including of properties functional to investigation the on focuses papers of series second A needs Likewise, protein alternative of development the that assuming the of foodprint) the appropriately more (or footprint T previously described methodological Engineering Bioproduct and Food for Science for division INRA’s within performed research of years 10 of digest i IFSET special This How resp council innovation recommendations for methodological adjustments. and science food 7. 6. iterativeinnovation. 5. impacts various and (environmental, efficiency health, social etc bioresource preferences, consumer of comprehension integrated well a supply will approach CAS this Ultimately, etc. fields, playing level conditions, boundary criteria, clear 4. wo papers wo

allenges

core issue of each of issue core have

- is discussed chara Monitor the whole process. For this final step, it will be necessary to form an international an form to necessary be will it step, final this For process. whole the Monitor Implement a research and innovation agenda agenda innovation and research a Draft using bioresources of use the address to approach (CAS) systems adaptive complex a Define

food trends of trends food non food 10

r aray soitd ih urnl existing currently with associated already are

focus on identifying societ identifying on focus trzd ope aatv sse fr food/non for system adaptive complex cterized (CEPIA) ( years researchof - address c Arthur Mc nrsv monitoring intrusive

papers (supply) . generate ssue

evolve

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Ti rsac hs rgesd nweg i svrl ra rltd o the to related areas several in knowledge progressed has research This . ,

food safety and hygiene and safety food the ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT paper deal

specific Innovation in food science and technology and science food in Innovation

Comment citer cedocument: chains in onain 2014) Foundation, analysis of bioresources of analysis s

well

a bioresources ih the with in this Special Issue Special this in system -

contribute ie monitoring) line oe ae hglgt te at that fact the highlights paper one , - consumer founded . ).

o td crba activity cerebral study to timeintervals , which means thatwhich means , framework.

al vrl fo sse ad ytmc approaches systemic and system food overall

needs. Future protein requirements and how to reduce the reduce to how and requirements protein Future needs. . d arguments appropriatefor decision making

. aiu experimental Various groups to Finally

urns ns r quite are ones currents a bioresource , focussing

nil fr vlaig ucms n making and outcomes evaluating for onsible . to cnann cer roiis o bekhog and breakthrough for priorities clear containing , . However, this is particularly explicit in explicit particularly is this However, ,

are analysed the tailoring of tailoring the analysed are

a via oeln ad prediction. and modelling n

o ifatutr SOLEIL infrastructure ron

article

sources will provide a means to achieve this. achieve to means a provide will sources a of of intelligent adaptive complex on on od auatrn sector manufacturing food structures and mechanisms and structures

- au can. hs s motn t note, to important is This chains. value based complex systems two whole value chain value whole two is -

od auatrn ta wl ofr an offer will that manufacturing food uig od consumption. food during dedicated to

approaches interventionsneeded are often -

a linear focus on France on focus multiple ‘knowledge engineering’

ae en employed, been have n two and

food suit tomorrow’s suit food T

e s o artificial of use he SLI, 2016) (SOLEIL, potnte and opportunities s s

approach . M . approach .

, relating these relating , Fcsig on Focussing . r addressed are - icrobi dimensional. ” articles h ue of use The provides a provides ologica ?

lies at lies

that

to at l

Version postprint research. Innovative Food Science andEmerging Technologies, 46,1-6. ,DOI :10.1016/j.ifset.2018.04.004 de Vries, H.,Axelos,M., Sarni-Manchado, P.,O'Donohue, M.(2018). Meetingnew challengesin food science technology: thedevelopment ofcomplex systemsapproach forfood andbiobased itineraries is appropriate. deep provide will that approach new radically a only Consequently, inconceivable. become will general) things of development disconnected addressthe integrated evaluation impacts of at bioeconomy s current of enormity the translat successfully made been has engineering issuespecial this of contents Bioeconomy 2002) developing Towardsnew a and shared vision agenda, about toaims push a for monitoring and Bioproduct this that area will open within thecoming possibilitiesyears. new the reveal that illustrations powerful by exemplified is biotechnology in entirevalor planttarget that concepts the ‘biorefin on t Europe in bioeconomy the of development future the for vital be also will biorefineries and technologies flagship of demonstration and development The > operated are processes conventional that realize to important is it this, achieve the deployment in strengthened further is This also It packaging. and engineering ‘nano of development the Regarding d construction with deal wo papers reveal the enormous potential for both scientific and innovative breakthroughs.innovativeFocusingand scientific both for potentialenormous the reveal papers wo 10 uring structuring food or during digestion inthe gastrointestinal tract 6

tde reveal studies r nih it te aueo boeore, nertd nweg adefcet transformation efficient and knowledge integrated bioresources, of nature the into insight er times - , technolog the need for an for need the eurd o dy o a living day to day for required I Scien of division INRA’s how reveals issue special this of foreword the Finally,

h Knowledge the we propose that NRA’s CEPIAdivision

modelling. Here, a wide variety of of variety wide a Here, modelling.

higher projects ery’ and on ‘biotechnology’, they propose r propose they ‘biotechnology’, on and ery’ Engineering . Therein .

,

ht s ennfl o Erp’ population Europe’s for meaningful is that hgl localized highly , - which was adopted in 2012 2012 in adopted was which

deconstruction’ y research highly efficient bioresource efficient highly cery eel te motne of importance the reveals clearly ’

than the redefinition of ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT d into ed biorefinery within converge manufacturing product biobased and food how with the need for for need the

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT International Council International - ( ae Bio Based in the frame the in

CEPIA Comment citer cedocument: the

agendas ocietal challenges ocietal

molecul

.

okn tcnlge ad omril products commercial and technologies working revea methodology It actively contributes

, ) is also noteworthy that noteworthy also is a

h cmlxt o structure of complexity the is actively involved in major international major in involved actively is

the

science and innovation agenda for food manufacturing food for agenda innovation and science optima . In the In . l es and structuresthat are being addressed

- efficacy and efficiency that much progress in the field of food and non and food of field the in progress that much ecie and describes Economy

work g Ti mas ht atg o boeore (n rsucs in resources (and bioresources of wastage that means This . is lobal

articles ation and the production of of production the andation solutions l

future,

(EC, 2012) (EC, of EU agendas such as the Strategy on Biotechnology on Strategy the as such agendas EU of described herein could be food scienceand innovation value chains that provide not only only not provide that chains value much to oversee its implementation its oversee to

modelling E, 2005) (EC,

ht el with deal that local and global scale

to working with its international partners, international its with working

clarifies the relevance of multi of relevance the clarifies remains to be achieved in order to create a real a create to order in achieved be to remains the European Union .

and the Horizon2020 program Horizon2020 the and Moreover (de Besi & McCormick, 2015) McCormick, & Besi (de significant amounts of knowledge have been have knowledge of amounts significant eal research & Innovation cases. Innovation & research eal agen . ol ae discussed. are tools

o civ this, achieve To in or or

- da engineering ucin relationships function

KBBE - oe technologies novel sett ,

eerh hud ou o the on focus should research multiproduct ing s a useful , thus avoidingdefinition the of are E, 2007) (EC, ’s (EU agenda in

concepts described in detail f . forums nano uture For

. . starting point

) iial, focussing Similarly,

However, bioeconomy strategy, food ,

and debate provoke - this portfolios science

- eerhnes to needs research cl approaches. scale

t scales at - h Srtg on Strategy the that are that is , but most of the of most but , food scienc food

bevd either observed ce for Food andFood for ce o sal scale small for (EU, 2013) (EU, .

future research future underlined In this regard, this In , considering eae to related Moreover, papers on papers CEPIA . . Progress.

. ht a that

defining

e ande . . To To . (EC, The will on re

Version postprint research. Innovative Food Science andEmerging Technologies, 46,1-6. ,DOI :10.1016/j.ifset.2018.04.004 de Vries, H.,Axelos,M., Sarni-Manchado, P.,O'Donohue, M.(2018). Meetingnew challengesin food science technology: thedevelopment ofcomplex systemsapproach forfood andbiobased following categories: The Perspectivesand food solutions the that expected is it objectives, these INRA that Assuming (e.g. scales smaller sensitive deve further notably necessary, are innovations and tools products biobased and food engineer r constituents bioresource betweeninteractions of evolution dynamic the to related knowledge generate to means the provide to This ecycling. In turn, once sufficiently complete, this knowledge should provide the means to reverse to means the provide should knowledge this complete, sufficiently once turn, In ecycling. the study of complex adaptive sys adaptive complex of study the 3. 2. 1. perspectives approach

rm cec t invto ad ie versa breakthro into insightsscientific of translation vice and innovation to science From appropriate decisions based sound on paper each further, go systems)’ Strategy described in this specialissue, technology and science Methodology: follows: the respect, this In analytical methods analytical e. d. c. b. a.

that properly address major should take into account the need for a more a for need the account into take should n artificial on underlined inpapers the focusing on of production integrated Continuously disruptiverather than incremental changes nano utilizing and novel Develop nutrition and consumer science. consumer and nutrition monitoring’ Reinforce may help noteworthy is It herein. described are Link like, socio till transversal agronomy from sciences underlying in experiences practical combining Continuously

:

recommendations for and recommendations based on findings in this Special Issue Special this in findings on based recommendations and approach e ugs ta te so the that suggest we miniature sensors miniature

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT economy clustering conceptsapplicable localat scales

virtual design and modelling and design virtual oehr ih the with together

here ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Comment citer cedocument: step to across the across the in Ti i srse i ppr daig ih od an food with dealing papers in stressed is This . od cec ad technology and science food Special Issue provides many suggestions many provides Issue Special could serve as basis for a new food science and innovation strategy. innovation and science food new a for basis as serve could better understan .

intel we strongly recommend strongly we

triptych ‘ triptych combine n hs taey o nes o e ute defined further be to needs now strategy this in For this, new developments both in large scale infrastructure and at and infrastructure scale large in both developments new this, For utial (eco sustainable Ti wl require will This . iec plays ligence - techno

cycle, from production to processing and digestion and/or digestion and processing to production from cycle, life tems. Notably the new methodology new the Notably tems. ) . As detailed in this in detailed As . to unravel at allscalesthe complexity of bioresources

food will be required be will the food research agenda of the future

wide od n bio and food

future utpe products multiple oy findin logy societal challenge - called and nutrition and d r

argumentation models

and international

- bioeconomy will provide will bioeconomy ocpin approaches conception) fnaetl role fundamental a The creation of specific functions in food, such as such food, in functions specific of creation The to to NA (nelgnl nvgtd ope adaptive complex navigated (intelligently INCAS powerful visualize practical biotechnology, biorefinery and proteins i te INCAS the in : ugh innovation principles and pragmatic cases.pragmatic and principles innovation ugh gs) applying

- to monitor bioresource monitor to based sciences in order order in sciences based ht a that science’, ‘process engineering’ and ‘on engineering’and ‘process science’, domains Special Issue Special n hgee interventions hygiene and . lopment of of lopment

scientific projects. tu avoiding thus , s cetfc omnt ae be o reach to able are community scientific nmrcl mdlig tools modelling (numerical) . systemic experimentation. Ways to achieve this achieve to Ways experimentation.

computer a com a - economics,

u ee nw circular new even but individual . that can that plex system plex strategy,

methodology , to achieve this, several new several this, achieve to , non n tutrn dt, taking data, structuring in

- ie vrul environment virtual aided ( .

innovative seily t ml scales small at especially (

- proposed herein) proposed intrusive, on intrusive,

losses

ih e fnig in findings new with

be sub be

s od chains food alysis,

ky set s the is aspect key a

are divided into the into divided are . across value chain value across

s n hs ead the regard, this In

Ti picpe is principle This . approach o rmt the promote to , better adapted better , - food

categorized as categorized and ht lead that - lk those like , line o spiral or ,

ad all and , n non and elh & health . , to to

should highly food - line To to s - - .

Version postprint research. Innovative Food Science andEmerging Technologies, 46,1-6. ,DOI :10.1016/j.ifset.2018.04.004 de Vries, H.,Axelos,M., Sarni-Manchado, P.,O'Donohue, M.(2018). Meetingnew challengesin food science technology: thedevelopment ofcomplex systemsapproach forfood andbiobased possible to advance in bioeconomy citizens Worldwide contributing The Fig. 4.

4. Bioeconomy

games ele new and gained is insight and including game These creativity. promote to tool useful a be actions Participatory must

national and regional governments regional and national f. . numerous

to the identification of solutions for sustainable food and biobased systems.

With various countries adopting countries various With

seize will el ih h itgain of biotechnology and biorefinery). integration the with deal underlined of results the Use being phase design the during neglected is nutritional experts Game definea sustainable food and bio

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT h opportunities the s

the same direction, aiming for this ambitious goal ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT constituteboth the play : ,

Comment citer cedocument:

sre f itntv, u itrcie ae siuaig raiiy and creativity stimulating games interactive but distinctive, of serie a students

properties in a paper focusing paper a in options. The options. : The development of development The

, innovators, , ments are introduced are ments , innovation

is meaningless if the if meaningless is o ssanbe rwh n development and growth sustainable for boundary conditions boundary

best

bioeconomy , on

and complexmost

citizens research and education institutions education and research od n non and food o fuel to

so food chains food - . based system - called ‘serious’ called Moreover, it is worth worth is it Moreover, , etc. ,

cetfc approaches scientific s should target multi target should s . The . (strategic)

final bio final

and provide an provide and

are strict are , but is also highlighted in papers in highlighted also is but , - combined od ibsd cecs eg on (e.g. sciences biobased food

monitoring tool (Fi - g. accessibility and bio and accessibility food plan

, 4

. but evolve over time time over evolve but

.

)

. s sustainability

, outcome of outcome recalling that the that recalling it should increasingly be increasingly should it evolutionary - This . stakeholder groups, stakeholder s!

prov ,

companies and companies

all is games dd y the by ided - framework availability

especially individual

as new as human could that

Version postprint research. Innovative Food Science andEmerging Technologies, 46,1-6. ,DOI :10.1016/j.ifset.2018.04.004 de Vries, H.,Axelos,M., Sarni-Manchado, P.,O'Donohue, M.(2018). Meetingnew challengesin food science technology: thedevelopment ofcomplex systemsapproach forfood andbiobased Mc Arthur Foundation (2014). Towards the Circular Economy Vol. 3: Accelerating the scale the Accelerating3: Vol. Economy Circular the Towards (2014).Foundation Arthur Mc 2015 the Meeting 2015. World the in Insecurity Food of State The (2015). WFP and IFAD FAO, impact footprint, wastage Food (2013). FAO Coun 2013/743/EU: Union. European the of Journal Official (2013). Union European European The (2011). (EPSO) Organization Science Plant European Platforms, Technology European Europe, for Bioeconomy a Growth: Sustainable for Innovating (2012). (EC) Commission European Knowledge the to route En (2007). (EC) Commission European Commission,DirectorateEuropean strateg a biotechnology, and sciences Life (2002). (EC) Commission European Bio the About Thoughts Some (2017). H. Vries, de & M., Besi, de rsdny o h Erpa Uin, oon, Germany. Cologne, Union., European the Communication fromCommission the to the Council, to November, 7, 2017) https://dechema.de/dechema_media/Cologne_Paper Presidency Belgium. 9535 Brussels, https://publications.europa.eu/en/publication biob industrial of production the Regions, knowledge the of November, 7, 2017) Committee Fpdf%2Fcom2002 the rKzXAhUF1xoKHbvmBP0QFggpMAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fec.europa.eu%2Fbiotechnology%2 economic the Council, and https://www.google.fr/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=0ahUKEwjn0dP8 the Parliament, European Committee the to Commission the and committee social and committee the regions. the of COM(2002)27. Communication from economic the council, parliament,the European the to commission the from Communication Verlag. ISBN 978 Perspectives Economic Technologicaland Bioeconomy: in Developments S., Dabbert Systems.InAdaptive Industrial Strategies. n MKne ad opn. ol Econom World Company. and FAO. Rome, McKinsey progress, uneven and of FoundationMacArthur Ellen the with collaborationin Prepared Geneva chains. supply global stock taking targets: http://www.fao.org/3/a hunger international http://www.fao.org/docrep/018/i3347e/i3347e.pdf b01c https://publications.europa.eu/en/publication 2020 (2014 HorizonInnovation and implementingResearch for Programme programme Framework specific the establishing 2013 December 27. 7/2014 the addressing No. accessed:November, 7, 2017) by Papers growth Discussion sustainable challenges. delivering 2030: in bioeconomy pdf final. 60 COM(2012) Regions. the http://ec.europa.eu/research/ of Committee the and Committee Social and Economic

(Last (Last accessed: November,7, 2017) - - 5e862e8d7847/language 649664f97a6d

comc, . 21) Twrs Bocnm i Erp: ainl Rgoa and Regional National, Europe: in Bioeconomy a Towards (2015). K. McCormick, -

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPTfor biotechnology plant of use the on conclusions Workshop bioeconomy. based ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT - 3 Comment citer cedocument: - - 27_en.pdf&usg=AOvVaw2D1vCCN0FCuLJvoq9p 319

(Last accessed:November, 2017)7, Sustainability, 7 - 58373 - i4646e.pdf - General for Research and Innovation (2005). Towards a European(2005).a TowardsResearchGeneral for Innovation and - bioeconomy/pdf/201202_innovating_sustainable_growth_en. -

0 en

I. Lewandowski, J. Weiss & Pyka A. (Eds.), A. Pyka & WeissJ. Lewandowski, I. . (Lastaccessed: November, 7, 2017) sd rdcs Yr Uiest 20 (ulse 2005). (published 2004 University York products. ased

(Lasta (8), 10461. Literature

n aua rsucs smay eot Rome. report, summary resources, natural on

ccessed:November, 7, 2017) - - - cnm a Itliety aiae Complex Navigated Intelligently as economy detail/ detail/

(Lastaccessed: November, 2017)7, http://www.epsoweb.org/file/560

theEuropean Parliament, theEuropean - - - /publication/8bc6bfc8 /publication/e0d4cc02 p -

20000945.pdf – - 2020) and repealing Decisions. repealing and 2020) ae Bio Based c ou, Switzerland. Forum, ic sbAq

(pp. 33 (pp. - cnm. German Economy. Ls accessed: (Last Ls accessed: (Last Knowledge -

- cil Decision of 3 of Decision cil b6b5 6da4 fr Europe. for y rn societal grand - 53): Springer53):

n Social and - - - 4841 4 up across up 5b1 - Driven

- (Last -

the Version postprint research. Innovative Food Science andEmerging Technologies, 46,1-6. ,DOI :10.1016/j.ifset.2018.04.004 de Vries, H.,Axelos,M., Sarni-Manchado, P.,O'Donohue, M.(2018). Meetingnew challengesin food science technology: thedevelopment ofcomplex systemsapproach forfood andbiobased Future (2009). W. R. Wrangham, Common Our (1987). (WCED) Development and Environment on Commission World 2016. Highlights (2016). SOLEIL. Sustainable (2011). (SCAR) Research Agricultural on Committee Standing Commission: European I. Stengers, & I., Prigogine, Overview. An Europe: UN in Bioeconomy the The for (2013). N. priorities Kautto, & Five K., McCormick, Policy: (2015). S. A. Stevance, & M., Visbeck, N., Nakicenovic, Y., Lu, (1995). S. Kauffman, (20 CIRAD & INRA (1998). H. J. Holland, ISBN 10:978 Report). http://www.un Brundtland the as to referred (commonly accessed:November, 7, 2017) accessed:November, 7, 2017) 2Fpdf%2Fscar_3rd lKzXAhXFSxoKHbVlBckQFggpMAA&url=https%3A%2F%2Fec.europa.eu%2Fresearch%2Fscar% https://www.google.fr/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=0ahUKEwi14Yb_ 79 Resource a in Production and Consumption Food Flamingo. ISBN doi:10.3390/su50625892589. Sust Complexity policy/Foresight/All Publishing Inc. ISBN:0 Co., 3 https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/publications/towards - accelerating - 19723 ainable Development Goals. - 9. 9. . New York: Oxford University ISBNPress. 0195111303 (ISBN13: 9780195111309)

ACCEPTED - MANUSCRIPT 1 9. giod Terra Agrimonde 09). : From Chaos to Order to Chaos From Emergence: - t Home At - ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 84668 the - - 10: 0006541151 ISBN documents.net/our Comment citer cedocument: Catching Fire: How Cooking Made Us Human Us Made Cooking How Fire: Catching - - (1985) scale foresight_2011.pdf&usg=AOvVaw15ctoyCOY8yXxFISaCV76N - the - 285 ISBN13:9780465013623 - -

n h Uies: h Sac fr h Lw o Self of Laws the for Search The Universe: the in news/Agrimonde up - Order Out of Chaos:Man of Out Order 201 https://www.synchrotron - across

-

14943 Nature, 520 - global - common - - 5 13: 978 http://institut.inra.fr/en/Objectives/Informing

-

supply (7548), 432 - - future.pdf 0006541158 . Boston, MA, USA: Addison USA: MA, Boston, . - chains -

constrained World, Rep. No. ISBN 978 ISBN No. Rep. World, constrained 's New Dialogue with Nature with DialogueNew 's - soleil.fr/en/news/highlights xod nvriy rs, xod UK. Oxford, Press, University Oxford

(Lastaccessed: November, 7, 2017) -

(Last accessed: November,7, 2017) 433. 10.1038/520432a

. Ne . - the w York, USA: Basic Books. Basic USA: York, w - circular Sustainability, 5 Sustainability, - - raiain and Organization Wesley Longman Wesley - economy

. London, UK:London, . - 2016 - public (Last . - (Last vol - (6), 92

- - - Version postprint research. Innovative Food Science andEmerging Technologies, 46,1-6. ,DOI :10.1016/j.ifset.2018.04.004 de Vries, H.,Axelos,M., Sarni-Manchado, P.,O'Donohue, M.(2018). Meetingnew challengesin food science technology: thedevelopment ofcomplex systemsapproach forfood andbiobased Highlights 3. 2. 1.

Food scienceFood moves towards food and bioresource targeted, new, for drivers transformation schemes key are heterogeneity their and bioresources of diversity The scienceFood needsnew, a core, methodology atthe edge of order and chaos

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Comment citer cedocument:

sciences