DOCSLIB.ORG

Camp Tatiyee Land Exchange Final Environmental Impact Statement

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Camp Tatiyee Land Exchange Final Environmental Impact Statement United States Department of Agriculture Camp Tatiyee Land Exchange Final Environmental Impact Statement Apache-Sitgreaves National Forests, Coronado National Forest, Prescott National Forest, and Tonto National Forest, Arizona U.S. Forest Service Southwest Region January 2017 United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, disability, sexual orientation, marital status, family status, status as a parent (in education and training programs and activities), because all or part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program, or retaliation. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) If you require this information in alternative format (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.), contact the USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (Voice or TDD). If you require information about this program, activity, or facility in a language other than English, contact the agency office responsible for the program or activity, or any USDA office. To file a complaint alleging discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20250-9410, or call Toll free, (866) 632-9992 (Voice). TDD users can contact USDA through local relay or the Federal relay at (800) 877-8339 (TDD) or (866) 377-8642 (relay voice users). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Camp Tatiyee Land Exchange Final Environmental Impact Statement Navajo County, Arizona Responsible Agency: United States Forest Service Responsible Official: M. Stephen Best, Forest Supervisor Apache-Sitgreaves National Forests 30 S. Chiricahua Drive P.O. Box 640 Springerville, Arizona 85938 For Information Contact: Edward W. Collins, District Ranger Lakeside Ranger District Apache-Sitgreaves National Forests 2022 West White Mountain Boulevard Lakeside, Arizona 85929 Phone: (928) 368-2100; fax: (928) 368-6476 Email: [email protected] Abstract The United States Forest Service (USFS) is proposing a land exchange between the Apache- Sitgreaves (ASNFs), Coronado (CNF), Prescott (PNF), and Tonto (TNF) National Forests in Central and Southern Arizona, and Lawyer’s Title of Arizona, Inc. The proposed exchange includes the transfer of one 344.24-acre parcel of federal land into private ownership and 18 parcels, totaling 1,719.32 acres, of private land into federal ownership. The land to be transferred to the USFS includes one 110.57-acre parcel to the ASNFs; eleven parcels totaling 1,153.18 acres to the CNF; one 11.15-acre parcel to the PNF; and five parcels totaling 444.42 acres to the TNF. The proposal to exchange lands responds to the USFS’s need for consolidation of federal land ownership patterns. Non-federal lands within national forests that are included in this exchange proposal are surrounded by national forest system lands and contain special features and habitats such as wildlife species habitat and perennial waters. The non-federal lands are also classified as desirable for acquisition because they contribute to an undesirable ownership pattern across the forests, making management of surrounding national forest system land more challenging. U.S. Forest Service i Camp Tatiyee Land Exchange Final Environmental Impact Statement Table of Contents Abstract ........................................................................................................................................... i Acronyms and Abbreviations ..................................................................................................... vii Executive Summary ..................................................................................................................... ix Document Structure ..................................................................................................................... xi Chapter 1. Purpose of and Need for Action .................................................................................1 Purpose and Need .........................................................................................................................1 Decision Framework ....................................................................................................................1 Applicable Laws, Regulations, Policy, and Agency Direction ....................................................2 Forest Plans Compliance ..........................................................................................................4 Additional Documents/Requirements for Implementation ..........................................................8 Tribal Consultation .......................................................................................................................8 Public Involvement ......................................................................................................................9 Environmental Assessment Scoping Period ...........................................................................11 Environmental Impact Statement Scoping Period ..................................................................11 Draft Environmental Impact Statement Comment Period ......................................................11 Issues ..........................................................................................................................................11 Issue 1: Recreation and Access ...............................................................................................12 Issue 2: Land Values and Socioeconomics .............................................................................12 Issue 3: Retention of Utility Easements ..................................................................................13 Issue 4: Loss of Cultural Resources ........................................................................................13 Other Related Efforts .................................................................................................................14 Other USFS Real Estate Activities in the Geographic Region ...............................................14 Chapter 2. Alternatives Including the Proposed Action ...........................................................15 Introduction ................................................................................................................................15 Alternatives Considered in Detail ..............................................................................................15 Alternative 1: No Action ........................................................................................................15 Alternative 2: The Proposed Action .......................................................................................15 Comparison of Alternatives .......................................................................................................44 Summary of Alternatives Comparison ...................................................................................44 Chapter 3. Affected Environment and Environmental Consequences ...................................49 Introduction ................................................................................................................................49 Projects & Actions Analyzed for Cumulative Effects................................................................49 Land Use ....................................................................................................................................51 Affected Environment ............................................................................................................51 Environmental Consequences .................................................................................................61 Recreation and Public Access ....................................................................................................65 Affected Environment ............................................................................................................65 Environmental Consequences .................................................................................................66 Socioeconomics ..........................................................................................................................69 Affected Environment ............................................................................................................69 Environmental Consequences .................................................................................................78 Plants, Fish, and Wildlife ...........................................................................................................82 Affected Environment ............................................................................................................82 Environmental Consequences .................................................................................................86 U.S. Forest Service iii Camp Tatiyee Land Exchange Final Environmental Impact Statement Grazing .......................................................................................................................................98 Affected Environment ............................................................................................................98 Environmental Consequences ...............................................................................................101 Wetlands and Floodplains ........................................................................................................102
Load more

Recommended publications
  • CENTRAL ARIZONA SALINITY STUDY --- PHASE I Technical Appendix C HYDROLOGIC REPORT on the PHOENIX
    CENTRAL ARIZONA SALINITY STUDY --- PHASE I Technical Appendix C HYDROLOGIC REPORT ON THE PHOENIX AMA Prepared for: United States Department of Interior Bureau of Reclamation Prepared by: Brown and Caldwell 201 East Washington Street, Suite 500 Phoenix, Arizona 85004 Brown and Caldwell Project No. 23481.001 C-1 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................................ 2 LIST OF TABLES .......................................................................................................................... 3 LIST OF FIGURES ........................................................................................................................ 3 1.0 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 4 2.0 PHYSICAL SETTING ....................................................................................................... 5 3.0 GENERALIZED GEOLOGY ............................................................................................ 6 3.1 BEDROCK GEOLOGY ......................................................................................... 6 3.2 BASIN GEOLOGY ................................................................................................ 6 4.0 HYDROGEOLOGIC CONDITIONS ................................................................................ 9 4.1 GROUNDWATER OCCURRENCE ....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Sell-0717 , Rincon Mountains, AGS Field Trip, Nov. 1971 , AZ, Pima Co. ,MILS
    CONTACT INFORMATION Mining Records Curator Arizona Geological Survey 416 W. Congress St., Suite 100 Tucson, Arizona 85701 520-770-3500 http://www.azgs.az.gov [email protected] The following file is part of the James Doyle Sell Mining Collection ACCESS STATEMENT These digitized collections are accessible for purposes of education and research. We have indicated what we know about copyright and rights of privacy, publicity, or trademark. Due to the nature of archival collections, we are not always able to identify this information. We are eager to hear from any rights owners, so that we may obtain accurate information. Upon request, we will remove material from public view while we address a rights issue. CONSTRAINTS STATEMENT The Arizona Geological Survey does not claim to control all rights for all materials in its collection. These rights include, but are not limited to: copyright, privacy rights, and cultural protection rights. The User hereby assumes all responsibility for obtaining any rights to use the material in excess of “fair use.” The Survey makes no intellectual property claims to the products created by individual authors in the manuscript collections, except when the author deeded those rights to the Survey or when those authors were employed by the State of Arizona and created intellectual products as a function of their official duties. The Survey does maintain property rights to the physical and digital representations of the works. QUALITY STATEMENT The Arizona Geological Survey is not responsible for the accuracy of the records, information, or opinions that may be contained in the files. The Survey collects, catalogs, and archives data on mineral properties regardless of its views of the veracity or accuracy of those data.
    [Show full text]
  • GSA ROCKY MOUNTAIN/CORDILLERAN JOINT SECTION MEETING 15–17 May Double Tree by Hilton Hotel and Conference Center, Flagstaff, Arizona, USA
    Volume 50, Number 5 GSA ROCKY MOUNTAIN/CORDILLERAN JOINT SECTION MEETING 15–17 May Double Tree by Hilton Hotel and Conference Center, Flagstaff, Arizona, USA www.geosociety.org/rm-mtg Sunset Crater is a cinder cone located north of Flagstaff, Arizona, USA. Program 05-RM-cvr.indd 1 2/27/2018 4:17:06 PM Program Joint Meeting Rocky Mountain Section, 70th Meeting Cordilleran Section, 114th Meeting Flagstaff, Arizona, USA 15–17 May 2018 2018 Meeting Committee General Chair . Paul Umhoefer Rocky Mountain Co-Chair . Dennis Newell Technical Program Co-Chairs . Nancy Riggs, Ryan Crow, David Elliott Field Trip Co-Chairs . Mike Smith, Steven Semken Short Courses, Student Volunteer . Lisa Skinner Exhibits, Sponsorship . Stephen Reynolds GSA Rocky Mountain Section Officers for 2018–2019 Chair . Janet Dewey Vice Chair . Kevin Mahan Past Chair . Amy Ellwein Secretary/Treasurer . Shannon Mahan GSA Cordilleran Section Officers for 2018–2019 Chair . Susan Cashman Vice Chair . Michael Wells Past Chair . Kathleen Surpless Secretary/Treasurer . Calvin Barnes Sponors We thank our sponsors below for their generous support. School of Earth and Space Exploration - Arizona State University College of Engineering, Forestry, and Natural Sciences University of Arizona Geosciences (Arizona LaserChron Laboratory - ALC, Arizona Radiogenic Helium Dating Lab - ARHDL) School of Earth Sciences & Environmental Sustainability - Northern Arizona University Arizona Geological Survey - sponsorship of the banquet Prof . Stephen J Reynolds, author of Exploring Geology, Exploring Earth Science, and Exploring Physical Geography - sponsorship of the banquet NOTICE By registering for this meeting, you have acknowledged that you have read and will comply with the GSA Code of Conduct for Events (full code of conduct listed on page 31) .
    [Show full text]
  • The Maricopa County Wildlife Connectivity Assessment: Report on Stakeholder Input January 2012
    The Maricopa County Wildlife Connectivity Assessment: Report on Stakeholder Input January 2012 (Photographs: Arizona Game and Fish Department) Arizona Game and Fish Department In partnership with the Arizona Wildlife Linkages Workgroup TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES ............................................................................................................................ i RECOMMENDED CITATION ........................................................................................................ ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ................................................................................................................. ii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................ iii DEFINITIONS ................................................................................................................................ iv BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................................ 1 THE MARICOPA COUNTY WILDLIFE CONNECTIVITY ASSESSMENT ................................... 8 HOW TO USE THIS REPORT AND ASSOCIATED GIS DATA ................................................... 10 METHODS ..................................................................................................................................... 12 MASTER LIST OF WILDLIFE LINKAGES AND HABITAT BLOCKSAND BARRIERS ................ 16 REFERENCE MAPS .......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix / Attachment 1A
    ATTACHMENT 1A (Supplemental Documentation to the: Mogollon Rim Water Resource, Management Study Report of Findings) Geology and Structural Controls of Groundwater, Mogollon Rim Water Resources Management Study by Gaeaorama, Inc., July, 2006 GEOLOGY AND STRUCTURAL CONTROLS OF GROUNDWATER, MOGOLLON RIM WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT STUDY Prepared for the Bureau of Reclamation GÆAORAMA, INC. Blanding, Utah DRAFT FOR REVIEW 22 July 2006 CONTENTS page Executive Summary…………………………………………………………………………….. 1 MRWRMS ii 1/18/11 Introduction……………………………………………………………………………………... 2 GIS database……………………………………………………………………………………. 5 Faults and fault systems………………………………………………………………………… 6 Proterozoic faults…………………………………………………………………………… 6 Re-activated Proterozoic faults……………………………………………………………... 6 Post-Paleozoic faults of likely Proterozoic inheritance…………………………………….. 7 Tertiary fault systems……………………………………………………………………….. 8 Verde graben system……………………………………………………………………. 8 East- to northeast-trending system……………………………………………………… 9 North-trending system…………………………………………………………………...9 Regional disposition of Paleozoic strata………………………………………………………. 10 Mogollon Rim Formation – distribution and implications……………………………………..10 Relation of springs to faults…………………………………………………………………… 11 Fossil Springs……………………………………………………………………………… 13 Tonto Bridge Spring………………………………………………………………………..14 Webber Spring and Flowing Spring………………………………………………………..15 Cold Spring………………………………………………………………………………... 16 Fossil Canyon-Strawberry-Pine area…………………………………………………………...17 Speculations on aquifer systems……………………………………………………………….
    [Show full text]
  • Summits on the Air – ARM for the USA (W7A
    Summits on the Air – ARM for the U.S.A (W7A - Arizona) Summits on the Air U.S.A. (W7A - Arizona) Association Reference Manual Document Reference S53.1 Issue number 5.0 Date of issue 31-October 2020 Participation start date 01-Aug 2010 Authorized Date: 31-October 2020 Association Manager Pete Scola, WA7JTM Summits-on-the-Air an original concept by G3WGV and developed with G3CWI Notice “Summits on the Air” SOTA and the SOTA logo are trademarks of the Programme. This document is copyright of the Programme. All other trademarks and copyrights referenced herein are acknowledged. Document S53.1 Page 1 of 15 Summits on the Air – ARM for the U.S.A (W7A - Arizona) TABLE OF CONTENTS CHANGE CONTROL....................................................................................................................................... 3 DISCLAIMER................................................................................................................................................. 4 1 ASSOCIATION REFERENCE DATA ........................................................................................................... 5 1.1 Program Derivation ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 6 1.2 General Information ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 6 1.3 Final Ascent
    [Show full text]
  • Incorporated Municipality Highpoints Compiled by Scott
    Maricopa County (AZ) Incorporated Municipality Highpoints Compiled by Scott Surgent, Initial draft: December 4, 2012. There are 24 incorporated towns and cities (municipalities) within Maricopa County. The highpoints of each municipality was determined by referencing http://www.citypopulation.de/php/usa-arizona.php , which shows the boundary of each municipality in detail, then referencing the topographical maps at www.mytopo.com , and carefully matching the boundaries from both sources together. The highpoint is within (or on) the boundaries, and excludes any higher ground within unincorporated county enclaves. Some municipality highpoints have a strong “permanency” since the boundaries are unlikely to grow, or impossible if the municipality is locked in by surrounding municipalities. On the other hand, some municipal boundaries may grow and absorb higher land. A note regarding each municipality highpoint is given at the end. Latitude and longitude coordinates are derived from mytopo.com. Avondale: Unnamed Peak 3,650+ feet, Estrella Mountains Regional Park, N33.294114, W112.32197. Buckeye: Unnamed Peak 3,671 feet, south of White Tank Mountains Regional Park boundary near “Tower Road”, N33.544232, W112.55086. Carefree: Black Mountain 3,398 feet, N33.815126, W111.94119 Cave Creek: Elephant Mountain 3,926 feet, Spur Cross Ranch Conservation Area, N33.895877, W111.98233 Chandler: Spot elevation 1,293 feet, Northwest corner of Val Vista Drive and Hunt Highway at southeast corner of city, N33.204713, W111.75527. El Mirage: Spot elevation 1,168 feet, Southeast corner of Dysart and Greenway Roads, northwest corner of city, N33.623470, W112.34196. Fountain Hills: Inferred elevation 3,180+ feet (20-ft intervals), on southeast ridge of Peak 3804 in the McDowell Mountains, on Fountain Hills-Scottsdale city limits, N33.627723, W111.78733.
    [Show full text]
  • Tectonic Setting of Faulted Tertiary Strata Associated with the Catalina Core Complex in Southern Arizona
    Tectonic setting of Faulted Tertiary strata associated with the Catalina core complex in southern Arizona Authors Dickinson, W.R. Citation Dickinson, W.R., 1991, Tectonic setting of Faulted Tertiary strata associated with the Catalina core complex in southern Arizona: Arizona Geological Survey Contributed Report by the Geological Society of America, GSA Special Paper 264, 115 p. Rights Geological Society of America, Inc. All rights reserved. Download date 03/10/2019 19:40:25 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/630008 L Tectonic setting ojJaulted Tertiary strata associated with the Catalina core complex in southern Arizona William R. Dickinson Department of Geosciences University of Arizona Tucson, Arizona 85721 l © 1991 The Geological Society of America, Inc. All rights reserved. All materials subject to this copyright and included in this volume may be photocopied for the noncommercial purpose of scientific or educational advancement. Published by The Geological Society of America, Inc. 3300 Penrose Place, P.O. Box 9140, Boulder, Colorado 80301 Printed in U.S.A. GSA Books Science Editor Richard A. Hoppin Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Dickinson, William R. Tectonic setting of faulted tertiary strata associated with the Catalina core complex in southern Arizona / William R. Dickinson. p. cm.-(Special paper; 264) Includes bibliographical references. ISBN 0-8137-2264-0 1. Geology, Stratigraphic-Tertiary. 2. Geology, Structural­ -Arizona. 3. Geology-Arizona. I. Title. II. Series: Special papers (Geological Society of America) ; 264. QE736.D55 1991 551.7'8'09791-dc20 91-17084 CIP Cover photo: View northeast across floor of San Pedro trough past incised drainage of San Pedro River in middle ground toward range front of Galiuro Mountains on skyline.
    [Show full text]
  • General Monitoring and Discovery Plan for the City of Phoenix, Maricopa County, Arizona
    General Monitoring and Discovery Plan for the City of Phoenix, Maricopa County, Arizona Prepared for City of Phoenix City Archaeology Office Parks and Recreation Department Pueblo Grande Museum 4619 E. Washington Street Phoenix, Arizona 85034 Pueblo Grande Museum Project No. 2017-009 Project Report No. 19-120 Desert Archaeology, Inc. Prepared by: T. Kathleen Henderson Submitted by: Patricia Castalia Desert Archaeology, Inc. 3975 N. Tucson Boulevard Tucson, Arizona 85716 July 31, 2020 ABSTRACT Report Title: General Monitoring and Discovery Plan for the City of Phoenix, Maricopa County, Arizona Project Name: General Monitoring and Discovery Plan Update Project Location: Phoenix, Maricopa County, Arizona Project Sponsor: City of Phoenix Sponsor Project Number(s): None (Pueblo Grande Museum No. 2017-009) Lead Agency: City of Phoenix Other Involved Agencies: Arizona State Historic Preservation Office; Arizona State Museum Applicable Regulations: City of Phoenix Historic Preservation Ordinance (Zoning Ordinance Chapter 8); Arizona Antiquities Act (ARS §41-841 et seq.); Arizona state burial laws (ARS §41-844 and ARS §41-865) Funding Source: City Description of the Project/Undertaking: Provide an updated general monitoring and discovery plan for the city of Phoenix Project Area/Area of Potential Effects (APE): Lands inside the boundary of the city of Phoenix and city-owned facilities that lie outside this boundary; acreage to be established by individual projects conducted under this updated plan Legal Description: To be established by individual
    [Show full text]
  • Coronado National Forest Potential Wilderness Area Evaluation Report
    United States Department of Agriculture Coronado National Forest Potential Wilderness Area Evaluation Report Forest Service Southwestern Region Coronado National Forest July 2017 Potential Wilderness Area Evaluation Report In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English. To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD-3027, found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.html and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form. To request a copy of the complaint form, call (866) 632-9992. Submit your completed form or letter to USDA by: (1) mail: U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Map of the New River SE 7.5' Quadrangle, Maricopa County, Arizona
    Geologic Map of the New River SE 7.5' Quadrangle, Maricopa County, Arizona by Robert S. Leighty and 1Stephen D. Holloway Arizona Geological Survey Open-File Report 98-21 November, 1998 Arizona Geological Survey 416 W. Congress, Suite 100, Tucson, AZ 85701 Includes 25-page text and 1:24,000 scale geologic map. I Department o/Geology, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, 85287-1404 This report was supported by the Arizona Radiation Regulatory Agency, with funds provided by the Us. Environmental Protection Agency through the State Indoor Radon Grant Program, the us. Geological Survey via the STATEMAP and EDMAP programs, Arizona State University, and the Arizona Geological Survey. This report is preliminary and has not been edited or reviewed for conformity with Arizona Geological Survey standards INTRODUCTION The New River SE 7.S-minute Quadrangle is located in the northern fringe of the Phoenix metropolitan area and is bordered by Biscuit Flat to the west, the Union Hills to the south, Paradise Valley to the southeast, and the New River and New River Mesa areas to the north (Figure 1). The quadrangle is bounded by latitudes 33°4S'00"N and 33°S2'30''N, and longitudes 112°00'00"W and 112°07'30"W. Given its location, the area has become highly urbanized during the last few decades and is still undergoing rapid population growth. Thus, the knowledge of the distribution and character of bedrock and surficial deposits is important to make informed decisions concerning management of the land and its resources. Geologic mapping of the New River SE Quadrangle is related to other 1:24,000 scale mapping projects of the Arizona Geological Survey in and around the Phoenix metropolitan area (Figure 1).
    [Show full text]
  • Phoenix Four River Flora
    The Phoenix Four Rivers Flora, Maricopa County, Arizona by Darin Jenke A Thesis Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science Approved April 2011 by the Graduate Supervisory Committee: Kathleen B. Pigg, Co-Chair Leslie R. Landrum, Co-Chair Elizabeth Makings ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY May 2011 ABSTRACT The Phoenix Four Rivers Flora is an inventory of all the vascular plants growing along the Salt, Gila, New and Agua Fria Rivers, and their tributaries in the Phoenix Metropolitan Area during the years of the study (2009-2011). This floristic inventory documents the plant species and habitats that exist currently in the project area, which has changed dramatically from previous times. The data gathered by the flora project thus not only documents how the current flora has been altered by urbanization, but also will provide a baseline for future ecological studies. The Phoenix Metropolitan Area is a large urbanized region in the Sonoran Desert of Central Arizona, and its rivers are important for the region for many uses including flood control, waste water management, recreation, and gravel mining. The flora of the rivers and tributaries within the project area is extremely diverse; the heterogeneity of the systems being caused by urbanization, stream modification for flood control, gravel mining, and escaped exotic species. Hydrological changes include increased runoff in some areas because of impermeable surfaces (e.g. paved streets) and decreased runoff in other areas due to flood retention basins. The landscaping trade has introduced exotic plant species that have escaped into urban washes and riparian areas. Many of these have established with native species to form novel plant associations.
    [Show full text]