First Nations Food, Nutrition and Environment Study (FNFNES)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

First Nations Food, Nutrition and Environment Study (FNFNES) First Nations Food, Nutrition and Environment Study (FNFNES): Results from Eel Ground First Nation, New Brunswick Atlantic AFN Regions (New Brunswick/Prince Edward Island and Nova Scotia/Newfoundland) University of Ottawa Université de Montréal Assembly of First Nations Final report April 2017 “Healthy Environment and Healthy Foods for Healthy First Nations” Funding for this study was provided by Health Canada. The information and opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors/researchers and do not necessarily reflect the official views of Health Canada. TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................... i LIST OF TABLES .......................................................................................................... LIST OF FIGURES ...................................................................................................... ii GLOSSARY ................................................................................................................ v EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................. 1 SUMMARY OF RESULTS FOR EEL GROUND FIRST NATION................................ 7 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ......................................................................................... 11 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................... 12 METHODS ................................................................................................................ 15 1. Household Interviews .......................................................................................... 20 2. Tap Water Sampling ............................................................................................ 25 3. Surface Water Sampling for Pharmaceuticals ..................................................... 27 4. Mercury in Hair Sampling .................................................................................... 28 5. Food Sampling for Contaminants .......................................................................... 30 RESULTS .................................................................................................................. 32 1. Household Interviews ............................................................................................ 32 a) Sample Characteristics ...................................................................................... 32 b) Socio-Demographic Characteristics ................................................................... 36 c) Health and Lifestyle Practices ............................................................................ 41 d) Food Security ..................................................................................................... 50 e) Traditional Food Use and Gardening ................................................................. 56 f) Nutrient Intake ..................................................................................................... 77 g) Concerns about Climate Change ....................................................................... 93 2. Tap Water Sampling Results ................................................................................. 95 3. Surface Water Sampling for Pharmaceuticals ..................................................... 109 4. Mercury in Hair Results ....................................................................................... 111 5. Food Contaminant Results .................................................................................. 117 Heavy Metals ....................................................................................................... 118 Persistent Organic Pollutants ............................................................................... 122 CONCLUSIONS ...................................................................................................... 130 REFERENCES ........................................................................................................ 135 i Appendix A. Summary of contaminant information ................................................. 140 Appendix B. Body Mass Index (BMI) ....................................................................... 144 Appendix C. List of foods used to calculate the cost of a nutritious food basket. .... 146 Appendix D. Types of fruits and vegetables consumed from personal or community gardens in the Atlantic ............................................................................................. 147 Appendix E. Conversion of Grams to Usual Household Measures ......................... 149 Appendix F. Eating Well with Canada’s Food Guide First Nations, Inuit and Métis . 150 Appendix G. List of common foods and beverages avoided because of intolerance153 Appendix H. List of nutritional supplements taken by First Nations participants in the Atlantic .................................................................................................................... 155 Appendix I. Map of Surface Water Sampling Sites .................................................. 156 Appendix J. Traditional Food Sample Harvest Locations ........................................ 157 Appendix K. Top traditional foods eaten compared against those collected for contaminant analysis ............................................................................................... 159 Appendix L. What participants said about traditional food ....................................... 160 Appendix M. Healthy Food Guidelines for First Nation Community Events ............. 161 ii LIST OF TABLES Table 1. List of participating First Nations communities in the Atlantic and number of participants .................................................................................................................... 34 Table 2. Number of households surveyed and participation rate in Eel Ground First Nation compared to First Nations in the Atlantic* .......................................................... 35 Table 3. Average age of participants ............................................................................ 38 Table 4. Household size and education, Eel Ground First Nation compared to all First Nations in the Atlantic .................................................................................................... 39 Table 5. Percent of participants who responded affirmatively to food security questions (in the last 12 months) in Eel Ground First Nation ......................................................... 53 Table 6. Percent of on-reserve First Nations in the Atlantic consuming traditional foods in the past year, Eel Ground First Nation compared to all First Nations in the Atlantic (listed in descending order, by category) ....................................................................... 61 Table 7. Seasonal frequency of top ten consumed traditional food items for consumers and non-consumers combined, Eel Ground First Nation (n=61) ................................... 65 Table 8. Mean daily portion sizes of traditional food categories, by gender and age group, based on 24hr recalls from First Nations in the Atlantic living on-reserve .......... 66 Table 9. Estimated average intake of major traditional foods (g/person/day), based on traditional food frequency results, Eel Ground First Nation compared to all First Nations in the Atlantic ................................................................................................................. 67 Table 10. Average number of food guide servings consumed per day by First Nations men (n=355) and women (n=624) in the Atlantic compared to Canada’s Food Guide (CGF) recommendations (unweighted) ......................................................................... 86 Table 11. Top 5 contributors to Canada’s Food Guide (% of total group intake), for First Nations women and men, living on-reserve in the Atlantic ............................................ 87 Table 12. Ten most important food contributors to nutrients for First Nations living on- reserve in the Atlantic region ......................................................................................... 88 Table 13. Comparison of nutrient intake (mean ± SE) on days with and without traditional food (TF), for on-reserve First Nations adults in the Atlantic ......................... 91 Table 14. Top 10 consumed store-bought food (grams/person/day), ranked by overall decreasing amount of consumption, Eel Ground First Nation compared to all First Nations in the Atlantic region ......................................................................................... 92 Table 15. Public Works Questionnaire Results .......................................................... 100 Table 16. Characteristics of homes and plumbing in Eel Ground First Nation and for all First Nations in the Atlantic. ......................................................................................... 102 Table 17. Results of testing for levels of trace metals in drinking water that would affect health, Eel Ground First Nation ................................................................................... 107 Table 18. Results of testing for levels of trace metals in drinking water that would affect its appearance, taste, odour, or colour, Eel Ground First Nation ................................. 108 Table 19. Pharmaceuticals measured in surface water near Eel
Recommended publications
  • FNFNES Summary of Key Findings for Eight Assembly of First Nations
    FNFNES First Nations Food, Nutrition and Environment Study Summary of key findings for eight Assembly of First Nations regions 2008-2018 University of Ottawa Université de Montréal Assembly of First Nations NOVEMBER 2019 The first comprehensive study to address gaps in knowledge about 1 TITLE AND METHODS diet, traditional food and environmental contaminants. Why was FNFNES undertaken? FNFNES: a community-based participatory This is the first comprehensive study to address gaps research project in knowledge about the diet, traditional food and FNFNES is the largest nutrition, food security and food environmental contaminants to which First Nations are safety study conducted in Canada with First Nations. exposed. FNFNES used a standard approach, with identical tools 3 There has been a gap in our understanding of dietary and methodology to conduct a survey of First Nations patterns, nutrition and exposure to contaminants from adults living on reserves in each of the eight AFN regions food because of the exclusion of the First Nations south of the 60th parallel in Canada. To ensure the study population on reserve from other national studies. assessed and represented the diversity of First Nations’ diets, a random sampling strategy was adopted, based on Key objectives included determining: an ecosystem framework that included 11 ecozones. patterns of use of food security status Participating First Nations were involved in the planning traditional and store- of households and implementation of data collection for the five bought foods and principal
    [Show full text]
  • 5 Traditional Land and Resource Use
    CA PDF Page 1 of 70 Energy East Project Part E: New Brunswick Volume 16: Socio-Economic Effects Assessment Section 5: Traditional Land and Resource Use This section was not updated in 2015. Figures referencing the Project description have been updated to reflect the removal of a marine terminal in Québec. However, the analysis of effects is still valid. This TLRU assessment is supported by Volume 25, which contains information gathered through TLRU studies completed by participating Aboriginal groups, oral traditional evidence and TLRU-specific results of Energy East’s aboriginal engagement program from April 19, 2014 to December 31, 2015. The list of First Nation and Métis communities and organizations engaged and reported on is undergoing constant revision throughout the discussions between Energy East and potentially affected Aboriginal groups. Information provided through these means relates to Project effects and cumulative effects on traditional land and resource use, and recommendations for mitigating effects, as identified by participating Aboriginal groups. The most relevant information for this section is Volume 25 for Woodlands ecoregion, which reviews additional TRLU information identifies proposed measures to mitigate potential effects of the Project on TRLU features, activities, or sites identified, as appropriate. The TLRU information provided in Volume 25 reflects Project design changes that occurred in 2015. 5 TRADITIONAL LAND AND RESOURCE USE Traditional land and resource use (TLRU)1 was selected as a valued component (VC) due to the potential for the Project to affect traditional activities, sites and resources identified by Aboriginal communities. Project Aboriginal engagement activities and the review of existing literature (see Appendix 5A.2) confirmed the potential for Project effects on TLRU.
    [Show full text]
  • Kia Law of Indigenous Peoples in the Americas Kia
    KIA LAW OF INDIGENOUS PEOPLES IN THE AMERICAS KIA Law of Indigenous peoples in the Americas Class here works on the law of Indigenous peoples in the Western Hemisphere For general and local history of the Americas in general see Classes E and F Bibliography 1 General 1.2.A-Z Guides to law collections. Indigenous law gateways (Portals). Web directories. By name, A-Z 1.2.N38 NativeWeb Resource Database. Indigenous Peoples' Law and Legal Issues 1.3.A-Z Non-governmental organizations (NGOs). By name, A-Z 1.3.I53 Indian Law Resource Center 1.3.I58 International Indian Treaty Council 2 General works 3.A-Z Special topics, A-Z Dual ethnic identity see KIA3.H96 3.E58 Environmental justice 3.H96 Hyphenation. Dual ethnic identity e.g., Native-American 3.I63 Indigeneity. Indigenism 3.S45 Self-determined and sustainable development of indigenous peoples United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, 2008 see K3246.42008 1 KIA INDIGENOUS LAW: NORTH AMERICA KIA Indigenous law: North America Cf. E75+ Indians of North America Bibliography 5 General 6.A-Z Guides to law collections. Indigenous law gateways (Portals). Web directories 6.I53 Indigenous Law Portal. Law Library of Congress 7 Periodicals Class here periodicals consisting predominantly of legal articles regardless of the subject matter and jurisdiction, e.g., American Indian Law Review, Indigenous Law Journal, Tribal justice today, Tribal law journal, etc. For law reports and digests, see the region or indigenous jurisdiction in KIA-KIK, e.g., KIE32 Native American law digest For official gazettes, see the region or indigenous jurisdiction in KIA-KIK 8 Encyclopedias.
    [Show full text]
  • Indigenous Engagement Guide Finalized Dra� – March 2021
    OCEAN FRONTIER INSTITUTE Indigenous Engagement Guide Finalized Dra� – March 2021 Disclaimer The Ocean Frontier Institute Indigenous Engagement Guide was developed in collaboration with our Indigenous Engagement Steering Committee and from feedback generously provided by Indigenous groups and the OFI research community. The Guide is intended to be evergreen and will grow and adapt as we move forward with our Indigenous engagement efforts and continue to receive feedback from Indigenous groups and our research community. It is important to understand that this guide is intended for information purposes only and offers perspectives and guidance for working toward meaningful and respectful engagement with Indigenous communities, organizations, and groups. The Guide was developed as a guiding document to better inform our OFI research community regarding Indigenous engagement in Atlantic Canada and should not be considered final or authoritative in nature. Any questions or concerns about this Guide can be directed to Catherine Blewett, Chief Strategic Engagement Officer OFI, at (902) 497-2387 or email at [email protected]. Recommended Citation Ocean Frontier Institute, Dillon Consulting. (2021). Ocean Frontier Institute’s Indigenous Engagement Guide. Retrieved from https://oceanfrontierinstitute.com/uploads/pdfs/indigenous-guide-march-2021.pdf. Accessed on: Month Day, Year Table of Contents i Table of Contents 1.0 Acknowledgements 1 1.1 Territorial Acknowledgement ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • People of the First Light
    1 Changes in the Dawnland Web URL: http://arcg.is/1W6QM0k Tap the play button to animate the map. Beginning of animation: End of animation: For thousands of generations, Wabanaki people have lived across what is now northern New England, the Canadian Maritimes, and Quebec. The arrival of Europeans more than 500 years ago began a process of dramatic and destructive loss that continues today. Much of the Wabanaki homeland was taken through a series of treaties, negotiated between various Wabanaki groups and the French, English, Massachusetts, Maine, and United States governments. Wabanaki and non-Native signatories often had very different ideas and interpretations of what they had agreed to. Wabanaki communities today are working to protect what remains, and to assert their sovereign rights in their homeland, for future generations. For photos and information about Wabanaki communities today, tap here: WABANAKI TODAY 2 Wabanaki Today Web URL: http://arcg.is/1QGlJ7O The Wabanaki Nations – Abenaki, Maliseet, Mi’kmaq, Passamaquoddy, and Penobscot – are thriving and growing in Maine and beyond. We invite you to visit, at least virtually, the many contemporary Wabanaki communities across Ckuwaponahkik, “the land of the dawn.” Click on a community name on a TAB above to learn more about the people and places of the Penobscot, Passamaquoddy, Mi'kmaq, Maliseet, and Abenaki Nations. Tap on the map markers to see details about tribal communities and land holdings. Photos courtesy of (clockwise from top left) Grace Jia, Bangor Daily News, Abbe Museum, and Donald Soctomah 3 Tribal lands include reservations and reserves where many members live and work, and where tribal governments serve their communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Directory of Services for Victims of Abuse in First Nations Communities
    NEW BRUNSWICK DIRECTORY OF Services for Victims of Abuse in First Nations Communities In 2016, PLEIS-NB created a publication called: New Brunswick Directory of Services for Victims of Abuse that provided a general overview of services for victims. However, it did not capture the full range and diversity of services and resources that may be available in First Nation communities. To address this, the Public Legal Education and NEW BRUNSWICK Information Service of New Brunswick (PLEIS-NB), in collaboration with Victim Services and Public Safety, produced DIRECTORY OF this informative, bilingual and largely online directory for victims of abuse in First Nation Communities. PLEIS-NB is a non-profit, charitable organization that educates the public about the law. It is funded by Justice Canada, Services the New Brunswick Law Foundation, and the Department of Justice and Public Safety. A fillable survey was emailed to all band councils across New Brunswick collecting information, suggestions and for Victims of Abuse in feedback on what should be included in the directory. We conducted research and sought input of many individuals First Nations Communities on potential design features including Gignoo Transition House. We also consulted with the Women’s Equality Branch (ECO) and Aboriginal Affairs Secretariat. Finally, we hosted a brainstorming session (talking circle) with key stakeholders in the Miramichi region where we travelled to meet with service providers, including Domestic Violence Outreach, Aboriginal Victim Services, and the local transition house. There were participants from several nearby First Nations communities. This new Directory offers a variety of traditional services that support victims, such as drumming groups, talking circles and so on.
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of Peer Review and Client Consultations for Dladromous Fish Stocks in the Maritime Provinces in 1995 ·
    DFO Atlantic Fisheries Proceedings 9811 ( Proceedings of Peer Review and Client Consultations for Dladromous Fish Stocks In the Maritime Provinces In 1995 · D~dromouaP~hDIVlston Marltlmes Region 343 Archibald Street Moncton. N.B. E1C988 April, 1996 PROCEEDINGS OF PEER REVIEW AND CLIENT CONSULTATIONS FOR DIADROMOUS FISH STOCKS IN THE MARITIME PROVINCES IN 1995 DIADROMOUS FISH DIVISION MARITIMES REGION 343 ARCHIBALD STREET MONCTON, N.B. E1C 986 April 1996 Table of Contents Part I Peer Review 1.0 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Environmental Conditions 2.1. Freshwater Flows and Temperatures .................................................................... 2 2.2. Freshwater Acidity Trends .................................................................................. 3-4 2.3. Marine Conditions ..........................• ....................................................................... 5 3.0 Atlantic Salmon 3.1 Saint John and Other Outer-Bay of Fundy (SFA 23) Stocks .............................. 6-7 3.2 Inner Bay of Fundy (SFA 22) Stocks .................................................................. 8-9 3.3 Lahave and South Shore Nova Scotia (SFA 21) Stocks ................................. 10-11 3.4 Eastern Shore Nova Scotia (SFA 20) Stocks ................................................. 12-13 3.5 Cape Breton (SFA 19 and part of 18) Stocks ................................................. 14-15 3.6 Northumberland Strait
    [Show full text]
  • Traditional Name: Buctouche Micmac Tjipogtotjg Nation: Mi'gmaq Mailin
    FIRST NATION COMMUNITIES IN NEW BRUNSWICK Official Name: Buctouche MicMac Traditional Name: Tjipogtotjg Nation: Mi’gmaq Mailing Address: Buctouche First Nation 9 Reserve Road Buctouche Reserve, NB E4S 4G2 Telephone: 506-743-2520 Fax: 506-743-8995 Website http://buctouchemicmacband.ca/ Chief: Ann Mary Steele Council: Brenton (Vince) LeBlanc Mathew Sanipass Term of Office: March 29, 2016 – October 2021 (*Custom Electoral System) Official Name: Eel Ground Traditional Name: Natoaganeg Nation: Mi’gmaq Mailing Address: Eel Ground First Nation 47 Church Road Eel Ground, NB E1V 4E6 Telephone: 506-627-4600 Fax: 506-627-4602 Email: [email protected] Website http://www.eelgroundfirstnation.ca/ Chief: George Ginnish Council: Anthony Wallace Francis Willie Sark Kyle Francis Brian Simon Merrill Martin Mike Simon Cody Narvey Kelvin J. Simonson Tyler Patles Alisha Sweezey (Ward) Term of Office: May 11, 2018 – May 10, 2022 (*FN Elections Act) Aboriginal Affairs Updated: August 9, 2021 FIRST NATION COMMUNITIES IN NEW BRUNSWICK Official Name: Eel River Bar First Nation Traditional Name: Ugpi’ganjig Nation: Mi’gmaq Mailing Address: Eel River Bar First Nation 11 Main Street, Unit 201 Eel River Bar First Nation, NB E8C 1A1 Telephone: 506-684-6277 Fax: 506-684-6282 Website http://www.ugpi-ganjig.ca Chief: Sacha LaBillois Council: Jake Caplin Derek Mulcahy Justin Gallen Ron Simonson Misty LaBillois Candace Narvie Anthony Miller June 23, 2021 – June 24, 2023(*Indian Act) Official Name: Elsipogtog First Nation Previous Name: Big Cove Nation: Mi’gmaq
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Development Corporation
    Regional Development Corporation Annual Report 2016-2017 Regional Development Corporation Annual Report 2016 - 2017 Regional Development Corporation 675 King Street P.O. Box 6000 Fredericton, New Brunswick E3B 5H1 Canada February 2018 ISBN # 978-1-4605-1460-3 (Print edition, Bilingual) ISBN # 978-1-4605-1458-0 (Web edition, English) ISBN # 978-1-4605-1459-7 (Web edition, French) ISSN # 0840-7967 (Print edition, Bilingual) ISSN # 2371-1574 (Web edition, English) ISSN # 2371-1574 (Web edition, French) 2 Transmittal Letters From Minister to the Lieutenant-Governor The Honourable Jocelyne Roy-Vienneau Lieutenant-Governor of New Brunswick May it please your Honour: It is my privilege to submit the Annual Report of the Regional Development Corporation, Province of New Brunswick, for the fiscal year April 1, 2016 to March 31, 2017. ser Minister responsible for the Regional Development Corporation From President to Minister The Honourable Bill Fraser Minister responsible for the Regional Development Corporation Sir: I am pleased to be able to present the Annual Report describing operations of the Regional Development Corporation for the fiscal year 2016-2017. Respectfully submitted, President 3 Minister's Message By working in partnership with other government agencies, institutions, and not-for-profits to support development priorities within New Brunswick, the Regional Development Corporation ensures that economically challenged regions within New Brunswick are provided with the necessary tools and infrastructure required to attain their full potential in terms of community and economic development. Thanks to the hard work of the Corporation's staff, Board of Directors, and partners, our government has been able to support New Brunswickers and their communities by providing high-quality programs and services while remaining fiscally responsible.
    [Show full text]
  • National Energy Board Office National De L’Énergie
    NATIONAL ENERGY BOARD OFFICE NATIONAL DE L’ÉNERGIE Hearing Order OH-002-2016 Ordonnance d’audience OH-002-2016 Energy East Pipeline Ltd. and TransCanada PipeLines Limited Energy East Project and Asset Transfer, and Eastern Mainline Project Oléoduc Énergie Est Ltée et TransCanada PipeLines Limited Projet Énergie Est et cession d’actifs et projet du réseau principal Est VOLUME 13 Hearing held at L’audience tenue à Hilton Saint John 1 Market Square Saint John, New Brunswick August 10, 2016 Le 10 août 2016 International Reporting Inc. Ottawa, Ontario (613) 748-6043 © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada 2016 © Sa Majesté du Chef du Canada 2016 as represented by the National Energy Board représentée par l’Office national de l’énergie This publication is the recorded verbatim transcript Cette publication est un compte rendu textuel des and, as such, is taped and transcribed in either of the délibérations et, en tant que tel, est enregistrée et official languages, depending on the languages transcrite dans l’une ou l’autre des deux langues spoken by the participant at the public hearing. officielles, compte tenu de la langue utilisée par le participant à l’audience publique. Printed in Canada Imprimé au Canada HEARING ORDER/ORDONNANCE D’AUDIENCE OH-002-2016 IN THE MATTER OF Energy East Pipeline Ltd. and TransCanada PipeLines Limited Energy East Project and Asset Transfer, and Eastern Mainline Project HEARING LOCATION/LIEU DE L'AUDIENCE Hearing held in Saint John, New Brunswick, Wednesday, August 10, 2016 Audience tenue à Saint John (Nouveau-Brunswick), mercredi, le 10 août 2016 BOARD PANEL/COMITÉ D'AUDIENCE DE L'OFFICE R.
    [Show full text]
  • Nourishing Food, Nourishing Knowledge
    NOURISHING FOOD, NOURISHING KNOWLEDGE Report on the Forum on Food Security and Nutrition among First Nations Communities in New Brunswick November 18 - 19, 2014 NOURISHING FOOD, NOURISHING KNOWLEDGE: Food Security and Nutrition among First Nations Communities in New Brunswick TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ............................................................3 Canadian Feed The Children (CFTC) would like to express our sincere thanks to the Elsipogtog First Nation Introduction .........................................................................5 Band Council, community Elder, and community members for hosting this Forum on their land and for participating Event Workshops and Outcomes ....................................6 throughout. CFTC is grateful to all First Nation community representatives from Elsipogtog First Nation, Day 1 ..................................................................................8 Eel Ground First Nation, Tobique First Nation, Chippewas Concurrent Sessions 1 ...............................................8 of Nawash Unceded First Nation, Esgenoopetitj (Burnt Concurrent Sessions 2 ............................................ 11 Church) First Nation, Fort Albany First Nation, and all other participants including academic representatives, non- Day 2 ............................................................................... 13 profit organizations, local government representatives, and Plenary Sessions ....................................................... 13 local food security networks.
    [Show full text]
  • Additional Information Requirements Regarding Engagement with Indigenous Groups
    Suite 200 Bureau 200 1801 Hollis Street 1801 rue Hollis Halifax NS B3J 3N4 Halifax, NE B3J 3N4 April 27, 2017 Agency File No.: 005578 Robert Stokes ExxonMobil Canada Limited Suite 1000, 100 New Gower Street St. John’s, NL A1C 6K3 [email protected] Dear Mr. Stokes: SUBJECT: Additional Information Requirements Regarding Engagement with Indigenous Groups I am writing to advise you that the Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency (the Agency) has determined that additional Indigenous groups may be affected by the Eastern Newfoundland Offshore Drilling Project (the Project), and that these potential effects must be considered in the environmental assessment of the Project. This determination was made following careful consideration of additional information provided to the Agency by an Indigenous group and Fisheries and Oceans Canada. The information identified additional potential adverse impacts of the Project on potential or established rights of Aboriginal peoples under section 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982, and potential effects of changes to the environment on Aboriginal peoples pursuant to paragraph 5(1)(c) of the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act, 2012 (CEAA 2012) related to: the migration of Atlantic salmon between the Project area and areas where Indigenous groups have potential or established section 35 rights, and communal commercial swordfish licences held by Indigenous groups within North Atlantic Fisheries Organization (NAFO) divisions, which overlap with the Project area. The Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) Guidelines (Part 2, Section 5.1, “Indigenous groups and engagement activities”) lists the Indigenous groups in the EIS for which ExxonMobil Canada Limited must provide baseline information and both an assessment of the potential impacts to potential or established section 35 rights and/or an assessment of potential environmental effects as described under paragraph 5(1)(c) of CEAA 2012, as applicable.
    [Show full text]