DOCSLIB.ORG

RNS Transparency Directive Guide

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
RNS Transparency Directive Guide COL4466_LSE RNS A/W_f copy 2 26/5/09 14:20 Page 3 YOUR TRUSTED LINK TO THE WORLD’S FINANCIAL COMMUNITY RNS and the new Transparency Directive COL4466_LSE RNS A/W_f copy 2 26/5/09 14:20 Page 4 Contents Section 1 Pulling together: The Transparency Directive overview 2 Strength in numbers: How to disseminate information effectively 3 Clarity and transparency: What the Transparency Directive means for you 4 The missing link: Looking to the future 5 Glossary: Key terms explained COL4466_LSE RNS A/W_f copy 2 26/5/09 14:20 Page 5 Introduction • The Transparency Directive takes effect in the UK • We also explain the way in which the Transparency from 20 January 2007. Directive dovetails with other EU Directives, all of which are intended to make European capital markets • This guide from RNS is intended to help companies work more seamlessly and effectively. and their advisers understand more about the Directive and its impact on them. • We explain what the Transparency Directive is and the inspiration behind it. • We describe how the Directive will be applied in the UK and we explain the part RNS has played – and will play – in its implementation. COL4466_LSE RNS A/W_f copy 2 26/5/09 14:20 Page 6 “The test for the Directive is how far it succeeds in raising standards of company reporting in jurisdictions where they have not been very high, without damaging practice in jurisdictions with higher standards, such as the UK. I think we can be relatively optimistic on both counts” Peter Montagnon, Director of Investment Affairs, Association of British Insurers 1 Pulling together: The Transparency Directive overview 1.1 The Transparency Directive overview Both cover disclosure but while the MAD focuses on the need to disseminate inside information as The Transparency Directive will create a framework soon as possible in order to avoid market abuse, for companies across Europe to adopt similar the Transparency Directive focuses on the standards around information disclosure. information that needs to be disclosed on a periodic The Directive has evolved over several years and basis, as well as shareholder disclosures and the way has been influenced by consultation with a number in which disclosure should take place. of interested parties, both in the UK and overseas. Until now, each country in Europe has operated The impact of the Directive will be greater in independently, imposing its own legislation and jurisdictions where there is a less well developed guidelines on companies and investors. Some disclosure regime, so the impact for UK companies countries have been more lax than others, both in will be limited. terms of the amount of information to be disclosed by companies and the amount of information The Directive requires companies to disclose disclosed by investors. information at regular intervals through specific channels and, in that way, it bears many similarities This unlevel playing field has disadvantaged to the existing UK regime. But there are certain companies and shareholders. And in recent years, areas in which the Directive will place new demands the need for a harmonised European capital market on companies and their directors, particularly with has intensified, reflecting a growing desire among respect to forward-looking statements. global investors for dynamic disclosure – that is, immediate disclosure when there is something Generally speaking, the Transparency Directive important to say. will not apply to AIM companies; however, the requirements concerning disclosure of voting rights In most instances, the UK is already there. Much of will apply to UK AIM companies. This requirement the content within the Transparency Directive has is explained in more detail later in Chapter 3. been based on London best practice and regulators and interested parties in London, including RNS, 1.2 The rationale have been widely consulted. The brainchild of the European Commission, 1.3 The benefits the Transparency Directive is part of a broader project – the Financial Services Action Plan (FSAP) – The Transparency Directive should benefit companies designed to create a single European capital market. and investors. In the past, investors have found it The Transparency Directive works alongside other hard to compare information on companies from pieces of FSAP legislation, in particular the Market different countries in Europe and this has, at times, Abuse Directive (MAD). made them more cautious about investing. Greater transparency will make comparative analysis easier for investors and this is expected to boost shareholder confidence. The cost of capital should also be reduced, for at least some companies, as investors show their preference for corporate transparency. COL4466_LSE RNS A/W_f copy 2 26/5/09 14:20 Page 7 1.4 The key points 1.5 The Transparency Directive in the UK In essence, the Transparency Directive covers the In all four areas listed above, the Transparency content and regularity with which companies should Directive has been informed by the UK model and report financial information and the way in which recognition has been given that this model works, that information should be relayed to the market. and works well. The Directive also obliges investors to disclose key shareholdings: The legislation is, however, a “minimum harmonisation directive”, which means that • For companies, the Directive requires them to EU member states, such as the UK, can impose produce annual and half-yearly (formerly interim) additional requirements (known as super- financial reports. In addition, the Directive obliges equivalence) on companies and investors. companies to produce an “interim management statement” for the first and third quarters of their In the UK, the Financial Services Authority (FSA) is financial year. This is a new requirement for tasked with implementing the Transparency Directive companies that do not already report quarterly but it has sought the views of various representative and the specific nature of these statements is bodies and interested parties, including the London an ongoing topic for debate between companies Stock Exchange. and regulatory authorities. While some aspects of implementation are yet to • Companies are also obliged to disclose regulated be finalised and best practice interpretation will 1 evolve, the Directive will become a fact of European information on a fast and pan-European basis. 2 For UK-listed companies, this is, broadly-speaking, company life in early 2007. The final rules for initial business as usual. They already use Regulatory implementation (excluding OAMs) were published Information Services, such as RNS, to disseminate in October 2006 and markets will be expected to information widely and speedily. In Europe, however, implement the Directive from 20 January 2007. different methods have predominated – such as 1 Regulated information is all the information that is required to be disclosed dissemination via print media or company websites. under the Transparency Directive, inside information and any other information requirements required in the home member state. • The Transparency Directive places demands 2 Subject to European Commission finalisation of implementation measures on investors too as they are obliged to notify and Royal Assent to the UK Companies Bill. companies once they have built up certain share stakes. • Finally, the Directive requires member states to ensure there is at least one Officially Appointed Mechanism (OAM) for the central storage of regulated information. The precise nature of these OAMs is subject to continuing discussion and will involve a further phase of consultation and implementation. COL4466_LSE RNS A/W_f copy 2 26/5/09 14:20 Page 8 2 Strength in numbers: How to disseminate information effectively 2.1 RNS is the leading service provider for disclosure RNS meets the Financial Services Authority’s of regulated information in the UK market: (FSA) requirements for UK dissemination, which authorises Primary Information Providers (including • eight out of ten UK companies use RNS RNS) to act as Regulatory Information Services. • nine out of ten UK companies use RNS for The FSA will retain this system after implementation price-sensitive announcements of the Transparency Directive. • over 90% of the FTSE100 companies use RNS Strict guidelines apply to these authorised providers of information so users of RNS can feel comfortable • RNS releases over 650 announcements a day about submitting regulated information and can be on average. sure that announcements will be handled speedily, efficiently and securely. However, RNS sees these Since 1990 RNS has been the foremost regulatory as minimum standards and makes sure its service news distribution service in the UK and works and performance levels exceed what is required in alongside other leading financial news distributors the FSA’s approval criteria. across the world. Customers appreciate, for example, the extended With more expertise in distributing regulatory support hours offered by RNS and the wide-ranging announcements than any other organisation, RNS technical and regulatory knowledge of its support allows issuers to have confidence their information teams. A recent survey revealed, in fact, that almost will be disseminated efficiently, securely and in 100% of queries are swiftly answered to customers’ accordance with local regulatory regimes. satisfaction. RNS distribution channels use the London Stock Exchange’s trading infrastructure, which is known 2.3 Pan-European disclosure for
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Final Report
    Final Report On draft Regulatory Technical Standards on major shareholdings and an indicative list of financial instruments subject to notification requirements under the revised Transparency Directive 29 September 2014 | 2014/1187 Table of Contents I. Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................................... 5 II. Background .................................................................................................................................................... 6 II.I Mandates and consultation process .................................................................................................... 6 II.II Elements of the Final Report .............................................................................................................. 6 III. Summary of the feedback and amendments to the draft RTS .................................................................... 8 III.I Draft RTS on the calculation method of the 5 % threshold referred to in the Article 9(5) and (6) exemptions of the TD .................................................................................................................... 8 III.I.a Horizontal aggregation – Aggregation of different categories of holdings (Article 9, 10 and 13 of the revised TD) ................................................................................................................ 9 III.I.b Vertical aggregation – Aggregation of holdings of financial instruments within
    [Show full text]
  • Establishment of New Disclosure Regime in the European Union
    Update: Establishment of New Disclosure Regime in the European Union In 2000, the European Union adopted a strategic plan, referred to as the Financial Services Action Plan, to create a single financial services market and facilitate the widest possible access to capital within the EU. One of the key elements of the Financial Services Action Plan is the establishment of a new EU-wide disclosure regime. The EU is in the process of passing legislation to set the regulatory framework for the new disclosure regime. The EU actions will change the requirements that capital market participants – issuers and financial intermediaries alike – will be required to meet in order to access the capital markets in the EU. The actions will impact the nature of disclosure that must be provided in connection with the offering or listing of securities and the nature of the disclosure that will be required on an ongoing basis. The actions also seek to provide greater transparency by mandating that financial statements in prospectuses and periodic reports be prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards adopted by the EU (which will preempt the use of local European GAAP regimes) (“IFRS”) or an “equivalent standard” (yet to be defined). The new disclosure regime has four key elements: • the Prospectus Directive, which generally will require any issuer to publish an approved prospectus (including financial statements prepared or restated in IFRS or an “equivalent standard”) in connection with a public offering in the EU or a listing
    [Show full text]
  • (Disclosure and Transparency Rules) Instrument 2006
    FSA 2006/70 TRANSPARENCY OBLIGATIONS DIRECTIVE (DISCLOSURE AND TRANSPARENCY RULES) INSTRUMENT 2006 Powers exercised A. The Financial Services Authority makes this instrument in the exercise of the following powers and related provisions in the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (“the Act”): (1) section 73A (Part 6 rules); (2) section 89A to 89G (Transparency rules); (3) section 101 (Listing rules: general provisions); and (4) section 157(1) (Guidance). Commencement B. Amendments to the Glossary in Annex A and Transitional Provision 6 in Annex C shall come into force on 22 December 2006, otherwise this instrument comes into force on 20 January 2007. Amendments to the Handbook C. The Transparency Obligations Directive (Disclosure and Transparency Rules) Instrument is amended: (1) by Annex A, amendments to the Glossary of definitions; (2) Annex B to this instrument amends the Listing Rules sourcebook (LR); and (3) Annex C to this instrument inserts into the Handbook new chapters in the Disclosure Rules and Transparency Rules sourcebook (DTR). Notes D. In Annex C to this instrument, the “notes” (indicated by “Note:”) are included in for the convenience of readers but do not form part of the legislative text. Citation E. This instrument may be cited as the Transparency Obligations Directive (Disclosure and Transparency Rules) Instrument 2006. By order of the Board 21 December 2006 1 Annex A Amendments to the Glossary of definitions In this Annex underlining indicates new text and striking through indicates deleted text. admission to trading (in PR and DTR) admission to trading on a regulated market. (Glossary) controlled means any subsidiary undertaking within the meaning of the Act undertaking other than section 258(4)(b) of the Companies Act 1985 or section 420(2)(b) of the Act; debt security (1) (in DTR 2, DTR 3 and LR ) debentures, debenture stock, loan stock, bonds, certificates of deposit or any other instrument creating or acknowledging indebtedness.
    [Show full text]
  • EUROPEAN COMMISSION Directorate General Financial Stability, Financial Services and Capital Markets Union
    EUROPEAN COMMISSION Directorate General Financial Stability, Financial Services and Capital Markets Union FINANCIAL MARKETS Securities Markets Brussels, 18 February 2015 CONSULTATION DOCUMENT REVIEW OF THE PROSPECTUS DIRECTIVE Disclaimer This document is a working document of the Commission services for consultation and does not prejudge the final form of any future decision to be taken by the Commission. You are invited to comment on the views reflected in this paper. These views are only an indication of the approach the Commission services may take and are not a final policy position nor do they constitute a formal proposal by the European Commission. The responses to this consultation will provide important guidance to the Commission when preparing, if considered appropriate, a formal Commission proposal. In replying to these questions, please indicate the expected impact described in each section of this paper on your activities or the activities of firms in your jurisdiction, including estimates of administrative or compliance costs. Please also state reasons for your answers and provide, to the extent possible, evidence supporting your views. If need be, files with additional information can be uploaded using the button at the end of the consultation page. In order to assist in the evaluation of your contribution, we would appreciate if you could maintain the structure of this questionnaire and indicate clearly the question you are responding to in any additional material you might want to pro vide. You are invited to reply to this online questionnaire by 13 May 2015 at the latest. Responses will be published on the following website unless requested otherwise: http://ec.europa.eu/finance/consultations/2015/prospectus-directive/index_en.htm.
    [Show full text]
  • Capital-Market Effects of Securities Regulation: Prior Conditions, Implementation, and Enforcement
    NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES CAPITAL-MARKET EFFECTS OF SECURITIES REGULATION: PRIOR CONDITIONS, IMPLEMENTATION, AND ENFORCEMENT Hans B. Christensen Luzi Hail Christian Leuz Working Paper 16737 http://www.nber.org/papers/w16737 NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138 January 2011 This paper previously circulated as "Capital-Market Effects of Securities Regulation: The Role of Implementation and Enforcement." We appreciate the helpful comments of Cindy Alexander, Sudipta Basu, Allan Bester, Utpal Bhattacharya, Luca Enriques, Michael Erkens, Matt Gentzkow, Chris Hansen, Alexander Hellgardt, Zachary Kaplan, Emir Kamenica, Daniel Paravisini, Jesse Shapiro, Andrei Shleifer, Jerry Zimmerman, and workshop participants at the 2011 Conference on Empirical Legal Studies, 2011 NBER Corporate Finance program meeting, 2010 PECA Conference, Bocconi University, University of Chicago, Chinese University of Hong Kong, University of Colorado Boulder, Copenhagen Business School, HEC, INSEAD, University of Manchester, University of Michigan, MIT, University of North Carolina, University of Rochester, Stockholm School of Economics, Temple University, University of Texas at Dallas, Tilburg University, Vienna University of Business and Economics, and University of Zurich. We thank several technical partners at PwC’s European offices as well as several CESR members and supervisory authorities for providing institutional information, in particular Mike Birch, Oliver Burkart, Jan Fedders, and Bernd Roese. We thank Philip Jacobs, Laszlo Jakab, Maria Kamenetsky, Jeff Lam, Frank Li, Elton Lor, Russell Ruch, and Michelle Waymire for their excellent research assistance. Christian Leuz gratefully acknowledges financial support by the Sondheimer Family Charitable Foundation and the Business and Public Policy Faculty Research Fund. The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Bureau of Economic Research.
    [Show full text]
  • Transparency Directive Assessment Report
    Prepared for the European Commission Internal Market and Services DG Final Report Transparency Directive Assessment Report Transparency Directive Assessment Report 2 Acknowledgement This study, undertaken by Mazars in collaboration with Marccus Partners, the law fi rm for the Mazars Group, is the result of a team effort which includes all the offi ces across 15 EU Member States and 6 major third countries. The project coordinators would like to express their deepest gratitude to all contributors. Above all, we are grateful to the European Commission for having commissioned this study and to the Commission staff for their comments and for the working relationship built up over the past months. We are grateful to the almost 400 stakeholders across the 21 jurisdictions included in the scope of the study that took the time to complete our on-line questionnaire. We are also deeply indebted to the 90 experts and market players that we had the opportunity to interview. Without their testimony on the day to day functioning of the transparency requirements established by the Transparency Directive we would have omitted some the key points. The results included in this study have been achieved largely thanks to the collaboration of 21 law fi rms; we are therefore grateful to CHSH, Cerha Hempel Spiegelfeld Hlawati (Austria), PRK Partners (Czech Republic), Marccus Partners (France), Marccus Partners (Germany), DLA Piper (Hungary), Eugene F. Collins Solicitors (Ireland), Marccus Partners (Italy), Elvinger, Hoss & Prussen (Luxembourg), Pellicaan Advocaten (Marccus Partners Alliance) (Netherlands), Siemiatkowski I Davies (Poland), Marccus Partners (Romania), PKR Partners (Slovakia), Marccus Partners (Spain), Mannheimer Swartling (Sweden), Olswang (United Kingdom), and outside the EU to HPP Attorneys at Law (Shanghai, China), Gallant Y.T & V Co.
    [Show full text]
  • Overview of Prospectus, Post-Admission and Transparency Obligations Under Union Law
    Deutsche Börse AG OVERVIEW OF PROSPECTUS, POST-ADMISSION AND TRANSPARENCY OBLIGATIONS UNDER UNION LAW Table of Contents Contents Page 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 1 2 Definitions .............................................................................................................................. 2 3 Competent Financial Regulatory Authorities ..................................................................... 3 4 Overview of Prospectus, Post-Admission and Transparency Obligations under Union Law and German implementing Law ................................................................................... 5 4.1 Prospectus Obligations ........................................................................................................... 5 4.1.1 Offering of securities ..................................................................................................... 5 4.2 Financial Reports .................................................................................................................... 6 4.2.1 Annual financial report .................................................................................................. 6 4.2.2 Half-year financial report ............................................................................................... 7 4.2. Report on payments to governments ............................................................................ 9 4.3 Inside information, insider list,
    [Show full text]
  • Implementation of the Transparency Directive Amending Directive (2013/50/EU) and Other Disclosure Rule and Transparency Rule Changes March 2015
    Implementation of the Transparency Directive Amending Directive (2013/50/EU) and other Disclosure Rule and Transparency Rule Changes March 2015 Consultation Paper C P15 /11** Consultation Paper CPXX/XX Implementation of the Transparency Directive Amending Directive (2013/50/EU) CP15/11 and other Disclosure Rule and Transparency Rule Changes Contents Abbreviations used in this paper 3 1 Overview 5 2 HM Treasury FSMA implementation 8 3 DTR implementation 11 4 Other TDAD modifications 19 5 Other proposed DTR changes 21 Annex 1 FCA cost benefit analysis 25 2 FCA compatibility statement 28 3 List of questions 30 Appendix 1 Draft FCA Handbook text 35 Financial Conduct Authority March 2015 1 Implementation of the Transparency Directive Amending Directive (2013/50/EU) CP15/11 and other Disclosure Rule and Transparency Rule Changes The Financial Conduct Authority and HM Treasury invite comments on this joint Consultation Paper by 20 May 2015. You can send them in writing to: Kate Hinchy Daniel Wright Markets Division Financial Services Financial Conduct Authority HM Treasury 25 The North Colonnade 1 Horse Guards Road Canary Wharf SW1A 2HQ London E14 5HS Telephone: 020 7066 8832 Telephone: 020 7270 7800 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] It is the policy of both the FCA and HM Treasury to make all responses to formal consultation available for public inspection unless the respondent requests otherwise. We will not regard a standard confidentiality statement in an email message as a request for non-disclosure. Despite this, we may be asked to disclose a confidential response under the Freedom of Information Act 2000.
    [Show full text]
  • Regulatory Mapping Disclosure Obligations
    Regulatory Mapping Disclosure Obligations 2020 Disclaimer This Document as well as any information contained herein is provided for general information purposes only. The content of the Document focuses on the main initial, ongoing or ad hoc disclosure obligations applicable under Union law. Although the Luxembourg Stock Exchange (LuxSE) has made all reasonable efforts to ensure that the Document is accurate and not misleading, the LuxSE does not accept any responsibility or liability of any kind whether for the accuracy, reliability or completeness of the Document or for any action taken or refrained from being taken or any results obtained based on the use of the Document. Under no circumstances will the LuxSE be liable for any loss or damage caused by reliance on any opinion, advice or statement made in the Document. The Document does not constitute and is not construed as any kind of advice, recommendation, undertaking or commitment from or on behalf of the LuxSE and should not be relied upon in that regard. The Document shall not be a substitute for own researches, investigations and verifications and does not replace appropriate professional advice or the consultation of legal counsel. Information in this Document is subject to change without notice. Regulatory Mapping Disclosure Obligations • 2020 1 Table of Contents 1 Definitions 3 5 Legal Entity Identifier 18 2 Prospectus rules 5 6 Rules and Regulations of the LuxSE 19 Prospectuses approved by the CSSF 5 7 Services offered by the LuxSE 21 Prospectuses approved by the LuxSE 7 Financial
    [Show full text]
  • Practical Guide on Notifications of Major Holdings Under The
    Practical Guide National rules on notifications of major holdings under the Transparency Directive ESMA31-67-535 | 01 September 2021 Date: 01 September 2021 ESMA31-67-535 Table of Contents Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 6 PART I: ................................................................................................................................. 7 COUNTRY-BY-COUNTRY SUMMARY OF NATIONAL REQUIREMENTS REGARDING NOTIFICATIONS OF MAJOR HOLDINGS UNDER NATIONAL LAW IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TRANSPARENCY DIRECTIVE .......................................... 7 Austria ............................................................................................................................... 8 Belgium ........................................................................................................................... 10 Bulgaria ........................................................................................................................... 12 Croatia ............................................................................................................................ 14 Cyprus ............................................................................................................................. 16 Czech Republic ............................................................................................................... 18 Denmark ........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • CESR's Advice on Possible Implementing Measures of the Transparency Directive
    THE COMMITTEE OF EUROPEAN SECURITIES REGULATORS Ref.: CESR/04-512c CESR’s advice on possible implementing measures of the Transparency Directive Part II: ¾ Notifications of major holdings of voting rights ¾ Half-yearly financial reports ¾ Equivalence of third countries information requirements ¾ Procedural arrangement whereby issuers may elect their ‘Home Member State’ December 2004 INTRODUCTION Background On 30th March 2004, the EU Parliament approved the Commission’s proposal for the Level 1 Directive on the harmonisation of transparency requirements for securities issuers (the Transparency Directive), subject to a number of amendments. Following on the Parliament’s decision, the European Council reached a political agreement on the Draft Directive on 11th May 2004 and agreed with the amendments adopted by the Parliament. Formal adoption and translation into the official languages of the Directive is expected to take place later this year. According to the Lamfalussy Process, the Commission may adopt implementing measures, so-called “Level 2 measures”, with respect to a large number of provisions of the Directive. Before the Commission presents a proposal for implementing measures to the European Securities Committee, it seeks the technical advice on these measures from the Committee of European Securities Regulators (“CESR”). To this aim, the Commission gives a formal mandate or sends a request to CESR for technical advice. Areas covered CESR received on 29 June 2004 the official request from the EC for technical advice on implementing measures of the Transparency Directive. The purpose of this consultation document from CESR is to seek comments on the draft technical advice that CESR proposes to give to the European Commission.
    [Show full text]
  • The Prospectus Directive Creating a Single European Passport
    PLCPRACTICAL LAW COMPANY PLCGlobal Counsel The Prospectus Directive Creating a single European passport The Prospectus Directive (2003/71/EC) • The replacement of the current • An application for admission to (the Directive) (see Glossary), amend- mutual recognition procedure with a trading of securities on an EU regu- ing the Consolidated Admissions and new “single-passport” procedure. lated market. Reporting Directive (2001/34/EC) (CARD), forms a major component of Both EU and non-EU issuers need to (Article 3(1) and 3(3), Directive.) the Financial Services Action Plan, be aware of the changes that the new which aims to create a single market in regime will bring about. This article Exemptions to the obligation to file financial services for the EU. explains how that regime will oper- and publish a prospectus on a public ate, focusing in particular on: offer or an admission to trading exist The Directive came into effect on its for conversion offers, takeovers, merg- publication on 31 December 2003 and • When a prospectus will need to be ers, bonus issues and employee and di- requires member states to implement filed and published. rector stock ownership programmes, its provisions by 1 July 2005. A regula- subject in certain cases to alternative tion implementing the general princi- • The prescribed format and con- disclosure requirements (Article 4, Di- ples contained in the Directive through tent of the prospectus. rective). detailed technical measures (Commis- sion Regulation (EC) 809/2004, OJ • How a prospectus will need to be Offer of securities to the public 2004 L149/1) (the Prospectus Regula- approved.
    [Show full text]