DOCSLIB.ORG

Final Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Final Report On draft Regulatory Technical Standards on major shareholdings and an indicative list of financial instruments subject to notification requirements under the revised Transparency Directive 29 September 2014 | 2014/1187 Table of Contents I. Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................................... 5 II. Background .................................................................................................................................................... 6 II.I Mandates and consultation process .................................................................................................... 6 II.II Elements of the Final Report .............................................................................................................. 6 III. Summary of the feedback and amendments to the draft RTS .................................................................... 8 III.I Draft RTS on the calculation method of the 5 % threshold referred to in the Article 9(5) and (6) exemptions of the TD .................................................................................................................... 8 III.I.a Horizontal aggregation – Aggregation of different categories of holdings (Article 9, 10 and 13 of the revised TD) ................................................................................................................ 9 III.I.b Vertical aggregation – Aggregation of holdings of financial instruments within a group of companies in relation to the trading book and market making exemptions ............................. 11 III.II Draft RTS on the method of calculating the number of voting rights referred to in Article 13(1a)(a) in the case of financial instruments referenced to a basket of shares or an index ......... 15 III.III Draft RTS on the methods of determining delta for the purposes of calculating voting rights relating to financial instruments which provide exclusively for a cash settlement ....................... 19 III.IV Draft RTS on client-serving transactions ........................................................................................ 23 IV. Definition and scope of the indicative list of financial instruments......................................................... 30 ANNEX I – SUMMARY OF QUESTIONS .........................................................................................................35 ANNEX II – LEGISLATIVE MANDATE TO DEVELOP DRAFT RTS ............................................................. 37 ANNEX III – COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS ....................................................................................................... 38 ANNEX IV – SMSG OPINION .......................................................................................................................... 54 ANNEX V – DRAFT REGULATORY TECHNICAL STANDARDS ................................................................. 62 ANNEX VI – INDICATIVE LIST OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS ............................................................... 67 2 Acronyms and definitions used Capital Requirements Regulation Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on prudential requirements for credit institutions and investment firms and amending Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 CESR Committee of European Securities Regulators Commission The European Commission Commission Directive Commission Directive 2007/14/EC of 8 March 2007 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of certain provisions of Di- rective 2004/109/EC on the harmonisation of transparency re- quirements in relation to information about issuers whose securi- ties are admitted to trading on a regulated market CP Consultation Paper on Draft Regulatory Technical Standards on major shareholdings and indicative list of financial instruments subject to notification requirements under the revised Transparency Directive (ESMA/2014/300) CRD IV Directive 2013/36/EU of the European Parliament and of the Coun- cil of 26 June 2013 on access to the activity of credit institutions and the prudential supervision of credit institutions and investment firms, amending Directive 2002/87/EC and repealing Directives 2006/48/EC and 2006/49/EC CWG Consultative Working Group of the Corporate Finance Standing Committee Directive 2013/34/EU Directive 2013/34/EU of the European Parliament and of the Coun- cil of 26 June 2013 on the annual financial statements, consolidated financial statements and related reports of certain types of under- takings, amending Directive 2006/43/EC of the European Parlia- ment and of the Council and repealing Council Directives 78/660/EEC and 83/349/EEC EEA European Economic Area ESMA European Securities and Markets Authority ESMA Regulation Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 November 2010 establishing a European Supervi- sory Authority (European Securities and Markets Authority), amending Decision No 716/2009/EC and repealing Commission Decision 2009/77/EC EU The European Union 3 MiFID Directive 2004/39/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 April 2004 on markets in financial instruments amending Council Directives 85/611/EEC and 93/6/EEC and Di- rective 2000/12/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Council Directive 93/22/EEC NCA National Competent Authority OJ The Official Journal of the European Union RTS Regulatory Technical Standard SMSG Securities and Markets Stakeholder Group set up in accordance with Article 37 of Regulation 2010/1095 of 24 November 2010 SSR Regulation (EU) No 236/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 March 2012 on short selling and certain aspects of credit default swaps Takeover Bids Directive Directive 2004/25/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 April 2004 on takeover bids TD Directive 2004/109/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 December 2004 on the harmonisation of transparency requirements in relation to information about issuers whose securi- ties are admitted to trading on a regulated market and amending Directive 2001/34/EC TFEU Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union UCITS Directive Directive 2009/65/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 July 2009, on the coordination of laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to undertakings for collective investment in transferable securities (UCITS) 4 I. Executive Summary Reasons for publication Directive 2004/109/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 December 2004 amended by Directive 2013/50/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2013 (hereinaf- ter the “Transparency Directive” or “TD”) requires ESMA to develop draft regulatory technical stand- ards (“RTS”) on major shareholdings. The TD furthermore mandates ESMA to establish an indicative list of financial instruments that are subject to notification requirements according to Article 13(1) of the TD. While developing the draft RTS and establishing the above mentioned indicative list of financial in- struments, ESMA consulted stakeholders by way of a Consultation Paper (a “CP”) (ESMA/2014/300). Contents This Final Report contains a summary of the feedback from the public consultation as well as the changes to the draft RTS and the indicative list which ESMA proposes based on this feedback. To a large extent the structure of the Final Report follows the structure of the Consultation Paper with the first part dealing with each of the four mandates given to ESMA to develop draft RTS and the second part dealing with the indicative list of financial instruments. The annexes of the Final Report consist of the questions asked in the Consultation Paper (Annex I), the legislative mandates for ESMA to develop draft RTS (Annex II), a revised cost-benefit analysis (Annex III), the advice submitted by the Securities and Markets Stakeholder Group (the “SMSG”) (Annex IV), the revised draft RTS (Annex V) and the indicative list of financial instruments (Annex VI). Next steps This Final Report will be submitted to the European Commission (the “Commission”) by 27 November 2014. The Commission has three months to decide whether to endorse ESMA’s draft RTS. 5 II. Background II.I Mandates and consultation process 1. The revised Transparency Directive was published in the Official Journal of the European Union on 6 November 2013 and entered into force on 26 November 2013. The Directive undertakes a re- vision of the regime for notification of major holdings of voting rights, introducing the rule of ag- gregation of holdings of shares with holdings of financial instruments and harmonising the calcu- lation of notification thresholds and exemptions from the notification requirements. 2. The revised TD thus makes market making, trading book and stabilisation exemptions mandatory for EU Member States. The Directive itself contains certain provisions on the requirements of such exemptions and these provisions are to be complemented by the RTS which ESMA is em- powered to draft in the area. 3. Moreover, with the aim to further enhance the transparency of major holdings of voting rights, the revised TD establishes an obligation to disclose holdings of financial instruments considered to be economically equivalent to shares in TD Article 13(1)(b). ESMA is empowered to develop draft RTS to ensure consistent harmonisation in respect of the calculation of notification
Recommended publications
  • Establishment of New Disclosure Regime in the European Union

    Establishment of New Disclosure Regime in the European Union

    Update: Establishment of New Disclosure Regime in the European Union In 2000, the European Union adopted a strategic plan, referred to as the Financial Services Action Plan, to create a single financial services market and facilitate the widest possible access to capital within the EU. One of the key elements of the Financial Services Action Plan is the establishment of a new EU-wide disclosure regime. The EU is in the process of passing legislation to set the regulatory framework for the new disclosure regime. The EU actions will change the requirements that capital market participants – issuers and financial intermediaries alike – will be required to meet in order to access the capital markets in the EU. The actions will impact the nature of disclosure that must be provided in connection with the offering or listing of securities and the nature of the disclosure that will be required on an ongoing basis. The actions also seek to provide greater transparency by mandating that financial statements in prospectuses and periodic reports be prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards adopted by the EU (which will preempt the use of local European GAAP regimes) (“IFRS”) or an “equivalent standard” (yet to be defined). The new disclosure regime has four key elements: • the Prospectus Directive, which generally will require any issuer to publish an approved prospectus (including financial statements prepared or restated in IFRS or an “equivalent standard”) in connection with a public offering in the EU or a listing
  • (Disclosure and Transparency Rules) Instrument 2006

    (Disclosure and Transparency Rules) Instrument 2006

    FSA 2006/70 TRANSPARENCY OBLIGATIONS DIRECTIVE (DISCLOSURE AND TRANSPARENCY RULES) INSTRUMENT 2006 Powers exercised A. The Financial Services Authority makes this instrument in the exercise of the following powers and related provisions in the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (“the Act”): (1) section 73A (Part 6 rules); (2) section 89A to 89G (Transparency rules); (3) section 101 (Listing rules: general provisions); and (4) section 157(1) (Guidance). Commencement B. Amendments to the Glossary in Annex A and Transitional Provision 6 in Annex C shall come into force on 22 December 2006, otherwise this instrument comes into force on 20 January 2007. Amendments to the Handbook C. The Transparency Obligations Directive (Disclosure and Transparency Rules) Instrument is amended: (1) by Annex A, amendments to the Glossary of definitions; (2) Annex B to this instrument amends the Listing Rules sourcebook (LR); and (3) Annex C to this instrument inserts into the Handbook new chapters in the Disclosure Rules and Transparency Rules sourcebook (DTR). Notes D. In Annex C to this instrument, the “notes” (indicated by “Note:”) are included in for the convenience of readers but do not form part of the legislative text. Citation E. This instrument may be cited as the Transparency Obligations Directive (Disclosure and Transparency Rules) Instrument 2006. By order of the Board 21 December 2006 1 Annex A Amendments to the Glossary of definitions In this Annex underlining indicates new text and striking through indicates deleted text. admission to trading (in PR and DTR) admission to trading on a regulated market. (Glossary) controlled means any subsidiary undertaking within the meaning of the Act undertaking other than section 258(4)(b) of the Companies Act 1985 or section 420(2)(b) of the Act; debt security (1) (in DTR 2, DTR 3 and LR ) debentures, debenture stock, loan stock, bonds, certificates of deposit or any other instrument creating or acknowledging indebtedness.
  • EUROPEAN COMMISSION Directorate General Financial Stability, Financial Services and Capital Markets Union

    EUROPEAN COMMISSION Directorate General Financial Stability, Financial Services and Capital Markets Union

    EUROPEAN COMMISSION Directorate General Financial Stability, Financial Services and Capital Markets Union FINANCIAL MARKETS Securities Markets Brussels, 18 February 2015 CONSULTATION DOCUMENT REVIEW OF THE PROSPECTUS DIRECTIVE Disclaimer This document is a working document of the Commission services for consultation and does not prejudge the final form of any future decision to be taken by the Commission. You are invited to comment on the views reflected in this paper. These views are only an indication of the approach the Commission services may take and are not a final policy position nor do they constitute a formal proposal by the European Commission. The responses to this consultation will provide important guidance to the Commission when preparing, if considered appropriate, a formal Commission proposal. In replying to these questions, please indicate the expected impact described in each section of this paper on your activities or the activities of firms in your jurisdiction, including estimates of administrative or compliance costs. Please also state reasons for your answers and provide, to the extent possible, evidence supporting your views. If need be, files with additional information can be uploaded using the button at the end of the consultation page. In order to assist in the evaluation of your contribution, we would appreciate if you could maintain the structure of this questionnaire and indicate clearly the question you are responding to in any additional material you might want to pro vide. You are invited to reply to this online questionnaire by 13 May 2015 at the latest. Responses will be published on the following website unless requested otherwise: http://ec.europa.eu/finance/consultations/2015/prospectus-directive/index_en.htm.
  • Capital-Market Effects of Securities Regulation: Prior Conditions, Implementation, and Enforcement

    Capital-Market Effects of Securities Regulation: Prior Conditions, Implementation, and Enforcement

    NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES CAPITAL-MARKET EFFECTS OF SECURITIES REGULATION: PRIOR CONDITIONS, IMPLEMENTATION, AND ENFORCEMENT Hans B. Christensen Luzi Hail Christian Leuz Working Paper 16737 http://www.nber.org/papers/w16737 NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138 January 2011 This paper previously circulated as "Capital-Market Effects of Securities Regulation: The Role of Implementation and Enforcement." We appreciate the helpful comments of Cindy Alexander, Sudipta Basu, Allan Bester, Utpal Bhattacharya, Luca Enriques, Michael Erkens, Matt Gentzkow, Chris Hansen, Alexander Hellgardt, Zachary Kaplan, Emir Kamenica, Daniel Paravisini, Jesse Shapiro, Andrei Shleifer, Jerry Zimmerman, and workshop participants at the 2011 Conference on Empirical Legal Studies, 2011 NBER Corporate Finance program meeting, 2010 PECA Conference, Bocconi University, University of Chicago, Chinese University of Hong Kong, University of Colorado Boulder, Copenhagen Business School, HEC, INSEAD, University of Manchester, University of Michigan, MIT, University of North Carolina, University of Rochester, Stockholm School of Economics, Temple University, University of Texas at Dallas, Tilburg University, Vienna University of Business and Economics, and University of Zurich. We thank several technical partners at PwC’s European offices as well as several CESR members and supervisory authorities for providing institutional information, in particular Mike Birch, Oliver Burkart, Jan Fedders, and Bernd Roese. We thank Philip Jacobs, Laszlo Jakab, Maria Kamenetsky, Jeff Lam, Frank Li, Elton Lor, Russell Ruch, and Michelle Waymire for their excellent research assistance. Christian Leuz gratefully acknowledges financial support by the Sondheimer Family Charitable Foundation and the Business and Public Policy Faculty Research Fund. The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Bureau of Economic Research.
  • Transparency Directive Assessment Report

    Transparency Directive Assessment Report

    Prepared for the European Commission Internal Market and Services DG Final Report Transparency Directive Assessment Report Transparency Directive Assessment Report 2 Acknowledgement This study, undertaken by Mazars in collaboration with Marccus Partners, the law fi rm for the Mazars Group, is the result of a team effort which includes all the offi ces across 15 EU Member States and 6 major third countries. The project coordinators would like to express their deepest gratitude to all contributors. Above all, we are grateful to the European Commission for having commissioned this study and to the Commission staff for their comments and for the working relationship built up over the past months. We are grateful to the almost 400 stakeholders across the 21 jurisdictions included in the scope of the study that took the time to complete our on-line questionnaire. We are also deeply indebted to the 90 experts and market players that we had the opportunity to interview. Without their testimony on the day to day functioning of the transparency requirements established by the Transparency Directive we would have omitted some the key points. The results included in this study have been achieved largely thanks to the collaboration of 21 law fi rms; we are therefore grateful to CHSH, Cerha Hempel Spiegelfeld Hlawati (Austria), PRK Partners (Czech Republic), Marccus Partners (France), Marccus Partners (Germany), DLA Piper (Hungary), Eugene F. Collins Solicitors (Ireland), Marccus Partners (Italy), Elvinger, Hoss & Prussen (Luxembourg), Pellicaan Advocaten (Marccus Partners Alliance) (Netherlands), Siemiatkowski I Davies (Poland), Marccus Partners (Romania), PKR Partners (Slovakia), Marccus Partners (Spain), Mannheimer Swartling (Sweden), Olswang (United Kingdom), and outside the EU to HPP Attorneys at Law (Shanghai, China), Gallant Y.T & V Co.
  • Overview of Prospectus, Post-Admission and Transparency Obligations Under Union Law

    Overview of Prospectus, Post-Admission and Transparency Obligations Under Union Law

    Deutsche Börse AG OVERVIEW OF PROSPECTUS, POST-ADMISSION AND TRANSPARENCY OBLIGATIONS UNDER UNION LAW Table of Contents Contents Page 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 1 2 Definitions .............................................................................................................................. 2 3 Competent Financial Regulatory Authorities ..................................................................... 3 4 Overview of Prospectus, Post-Admission and Transparency Obligations under Union Law and German implementing Law ................................................................................... 5 4.1 Prospectus Obligations ........................................................................................................... 5 4.1.1 Offering of securities ..................................................................................................... 5 4.2 Financial Reports .................................................................................................................... 6 4.2.1 Annual financial report .................................................................................................. 6 4.2.2 Half-year financial report ............................................................................................... 7 4.2. Report on payments to governments ............................................................................ 9 4.3 Inside information, insider list,
  • Implementation of the Transparency Directive Amending Directive (2013/50/EU) and Other Disclosure Rule and Transparency Rule Changes March 2015

    Implementation of the Transparency Directive Amending Directive (2013/50/EU) and Other Disclosure Rule and Transparency Rule Changes March 2015

    Implementation of the Transparency Directive Amending Directive (2013/50/EU) and other Disclosure Rule and Transparency Rule Changes March 2015 Consultation Paper C P15 /11** Consultation Paper CPXX/XX Implementation of the Transparency Directive Amending Directive (2013/50/EU) CP15/11 and other Disclosure Rule and Transparency Rule Changes Contents Abbreviations used in this paper 3 1 Overview 5 2 HM Treasury FSMA implementation 8 3 DTR implementation 11 4 Other TDAD modifications 19 5 Other proposed DTR changes 21 Annex 1 FCA cost benefit analysis 25 2 FCA compatibility statement 28 3 List of questions 30 Appendix 1 Draft FCA Handbook text 35 Financial Conduct Authority March 2015 1 Implementation of the Transparency Directive Amending Directive (2013/50/EU) CP15/11 and other Disclosure Rule and Transparency Rule Changes The Financial Conduct Authority and HM Treasury invite comments on this joint Consultation Paper by 20 May 2015. You can send them in writing to: Kate Hinchy Daniel Wright Markets Division Financial Services Financial Conduct Authority HM Treasury 25 The North Colonnade 1 Horse Guards Road Canary Wharf SW1A 2HQ London E14 5HS Telephone: 020 7066 8832 Telephone: 020 7270 7800 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] It is the policy of both the FCA and HM Treasury to make all responses to formal consultation available for public inspection unless the respondent requests otherwise. We will not regard a standard confidentiality statement in an email message as a request for non-disclosure. Despite this, we may be asked to disclose a confidential response under the Freedom of Information Act 2000.
  • Regulatory Mapping Disclosure Obligations

    Regulatory Mapping Disclosure Obligations

    Regulatory Mapping Disclosure Obligations 2020 Disclaimer This Document as well as any information contained herein is provided for general information purposes only. The content of the Document focuses on the main initial, ongoing or ad hoc disclosure obligations applicable under Union law. Although the Luxembourg Stock Exchange (LuxSE) has made all reasonable efforts to ensure that the Document is accurate and not misleading, the LuxSE does not accept any responsibility or liability of any kind whether for the accuracy, reliability or completeness of the Document or for any action taken or refrained from being taken or any results obtained based on the use of the Document. Under no circumstances will the LuxSE be liable for any loss or damage caused by reliance on any opinion, advice or statement made in the Document. The Document does not constitute and is not construed as any kind of advice, recommendation, undertaking or commitment from or on behalf of the LuxSE and should not be relied upon in that regard. The Document shall not be a substitute for own researches, investigations and verifications and does not replace appropriate professional advice or the consultation of legal counsel. Information in this Document is subject to change without notice. Regulatory Mapping Disclosure Obligations • 2020 1 Table of Contents 1 Definitions 3 5 Legal Entity Identifier 18 2 Prospectus rules 5 6 Rules and Regulations of the LuxSE 19 Prospectuses approved by the CSSF 5 7 Services offered by the LuxSE 21 Prospectuses approved by the LuxSE 7 Financial

  • Practical Guide on Notifications of Major Holdings Under The

    Practical Guide National rules on notifications of major holdings under the Transparency Directive ESMA31-67-535 | 01 September 2021 Date: 01 September 2021 ESMA31-67-535 Table of Contents Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 6 PART I: ................................................................................................................................. 7 COUNTRY-BY-COUNTRY SUMMARY OF NATIONAL REQUIREMENTS REGARDING NOTIFICATIONS OF MAJOR HOLDINGS UNDER NATIONAL LAW IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TRANSPARENCY DIRECTIVE .......................................... 7 Austria ............................................................................................................................... 8 Belgium ........................................................................................................................... 10 Bulgaria ........................................................................................................................... 12 Croatia ............................................................................................................................ 14 Cyprus ............................................................................................................................. 16 Czech Republic ............................................................................................................... 18 Denmark ........................................................................................................................

  • CESR's Advice on Possible Implementing Measures of the Transparency Directive

    THE COMMITTEE OF EUROPEAN SECURITIES REGULATORS Ref.: CESR/04-512c CESR’s advice on possible implementing measures of the Transparency Directive Part II: ¾ Notifications of major holdings of voting rights ¾ Half-yearly financial reports ¾ Equivalence of third countries information requirements ¾ Procedural arrangement whereby issuers may elect their ‘Home Member State’ December 2004 INTRODUCTION Background On 30th March 2004, the EU Parliament approved the Commission’s proposal for the Level 1 Directive on the harmonisation of transparency requirements for securities issuers (the Transparency Directive), subject to a number of amendments. Following on the Parliament’s decision, the European Council reached a political agreement on the Draft Directive on 11th May 2004 and agreed with the amendments adopted by the Parliament. Formal adoption and translation into the official languages of the Directive is expected to take place later this year. According to the Lamfalussy Process, the Commission may adopt implementing measures, so-called “Level 2 measures”, with respect to a large number of provisions of the Directive. Before the Commission presents a proposal for implementing measures to the European Securities Committee, it seeks the technical advice on these measures from the Committee of European Securities Regulators (“CESR”). To this aim, the Commission gives a formal mandate or sends a request to CESR for technical advice. Areas covered CESR received on 29 June 2004 the official request from the EC for technical advice on implementing measures of the Transparency Directive. The purpose of this consultation document from CESR is to seek comments on the draft technical advice that CESR proposes to give to the European Commission.
  • RNS Transparency Directive Guide

    RNS Transparency Directive Guide

    COL4466_LSE RNS A/W_f copy 2 26/5/09 14:20 Page 3 YOUR TRUSTED LINK TO THE WORLD’S FINANCIAL COMMUNITY RNS and the new Transparency Directive COL4466_LSE RNS A/W_f copy 2 26/5/09 14:20 Page 4 Contents Section 1 Pulling together: The Transparency Directive overview 2 Strength in numbers: How to disseminate information effectively 3 Clarity and transparency: What the Transparency Directive means for you 4 The missing link: Looking to the future 5 Glossary: Key terms explained COL4466_LSE RNS A/W_f copy 2 26/5/09 14:20 Page 5 Introduction • The Transparency Directive takes effect in the UK • We also explain the way in which the Transparency from 20 January 2007. Directive dovetails with other EU Directives, all of which are intended to make European capital markets • This guide from RNS is intended to help companies work more seamlessly and effectively. and their advisers understand more about the Directive and its impact on them. • We explain what the Transparency Directive is and the inspiration behind it. • We describe how the Directive will be applied in the UK and we explain the part RNS has played – and will play – in its implementation. COL4466_LSE RNS A/W_f copy 2 26/5/09 14:20 Page 6 “The test for the Directive is how far it succeeds in raising standards of company reporting in jurisdictions where they have not been very high, without damaging practice in jurisdictions with higher standards, such as the UK. I think we can be relatively optimistic on both counts” Peter Montagnon, Director of Investment Affairs, Association of British Insurers 1 Pulling together: The Transparency Directive overview 1.1 The Transparency Directive overview Both cover disclosure but while the MAD focuses on the need to disseminate inside information as The Transparency Directive will create a framework soon as possible in order to avoid market abuse, for companies across Europe to adopt similar the Transparency Directive focuses on the standards around information disclosure.
  • The Prospectus Directive Creating a Single European Passport

    The Prospectus Directive Creating a Single European Passport

    PLCPRACTICAL LAW COMPANY PLCGlobal Counsel The Prospectus Directive Creating a single European passport The Prospectus Directive (2003/71/EC) • The replacement of the current • An application for admission to (the Directive) (see Glossary), amend- mutual recognition procedure with a trading of securities on an EU regu- ing the Consolidated Admissions and new “single-passport” procedure. lated market. Reporting Directive (2001/34/EC) (CARD), forms a major component of Both EU and non-EU issuers need to (Article 3(1) and 3(3), Directive.) the Financial Services Action Plan, be aware of the changes that the new which aims to create a single market in regime will bring about. This article Exemptions to the obligation to file financial services for the EU. explains how that regime will oper- and publish a prospectus on a public ate, focusing in particular on: offer or an admission to trading exist The Directive came into effect on its for conversion offers, takeovers, merg- publication on 31 December 2003 and • When a prospectus will need to be ers, bonus issues and employee and di- requires member states to implement filed and published. rector stock ownership programmes, its provisions by 1 July 2005. A regula- subject in certain cases to alternative tion implementing the general princi- • The prescribed format and con- disclosure requirements (Article 4, Di- ples contained in the Directive through tent of the prospectus. rective). detailed technical measures (Commis- sion Regulation (EC) 809/2004, OJ • How a prospectus will need to be Offer of securities to the public 2004 L149/1) (the Prospectus Regula- approved.