DOCSLIB.ORG

The Prospectus Directive Creating a Single European Passport

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Prospectus Directive Creating a Single European Passport PLCPRACTICAL LAW COMPANY PLCGlobal Counsel The Prospectus Directive Creating a single European passport The Prospectus Directive (2003/71/EC) • The replacement of the current • An application for admission to (the Directive) (see Glossary), amend- mutual recognition procedure with a trading of securities on an EU regu- ing the Consolidated Admissions and new “single-passport” procedure. lated market. Reporting Directive (2001/34/EC) (CARD), forms a major component of Both EU and non-EU issuers need to (Article 3(1) and 3(3), Directive.) the Financial Services Action Plan, be aware of the changes that the new which aims to create a single market in regime will bring about. This article Exemptions to the obligation to file financial services for the EU. explains how that regime will oper- and publish a prospectus on a public ate, focusing in particular on: offer or an admission to trading exist The Directive came into effect on its for conversion offers, takeovers, merg- publication on 31 December 2003 and • When a prospectus will need to be ers, bonus issues and employee and di- requires member states to implement filed and published. rector stock ownership programmes, its provisions by 1 July 2005. A regula- subject in certain cases to alternative tion implementing the general princi- • The prescribed format and con- disclosure requirements (Article 4, Di- ples contained in the Directive through tent of the prospectus. rective). detailed technical measures (Commis- sion Regulation (EC) 809/2004, OJ • How a prospectus will need to be Offer of securities to the public 2004 L149/1) (the Prospectus Regula- approved. To ensure harmonisation through- tion), was adopted by the European out the EU, the Directive introduces, Commission on 29 April 2004 and will • Other requirements set out by the for the first time, a pan-European be directly applicable as law in mem- Directive relating to language, publi- definition of an offer of securities to ber states from 1 July 2005. cation and advertising, and annual the public: “a communication to disclosure. persons in any form and by any Once implemented, the Directive, as a means, presenting sufficient infor- maximum harmonisation directive, • The practical implications of the mation on the terms of the offer and will constitute a major step forward in new regime for issuers. the securities to be offered, so as to the integration of the European securi- enable an investor to decide to pur- ties markets, in particular through: Filing and publication chase or subscribe to these securi- ties” (Article 2(1)(d), Directive). • A new EU-wide definition of what A prospectus will need to be filed for While this definition is broad, it is an “offer to the public” is and EU-wide approval with the competent national unlikely that it would capture com- transactional exemptions for non- regulator (see below Approval) and munications that do not refer to an public offers. published (see Other matters: Publi- offer price. cation and advertising) on either of • A single regime throughout the EU two events. These are: The following public offers are ex- governing the content, format, ap- empt from the obligation to file and proval and publication of such • An offer of securities to the public publish a prospectus (exempt public prospectuses. within the EU. offers): 28 PLCGLOBAL COUNSEL • JUNE 2004 • www.practicallaw.com/aboutglobal (C) Legal & Commercial Publishing Ltd 2004. This article first appeared in the June 2004 issue of PLC Global Counsel and is reproduced with the permission of the publisher. Please see www.practicallaw.com/aboutglobal for more details. FEATURE Pierre-Marie Boury and Raj Panasar of Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton analyse the new EC regime governing prospectuses, and consider the implications for EU and non-EU issuers. www.practicallaw.com/A40700 • Offers made to qualified investors. • Private placements made to fewer than 100 persons (other than qualified investors) in each member state. • Offers with a minimum total con- sideration per investor or specified de- nomination per unit of EUR50,000. • Offers of securities with a total con- sideration of less than EUR100,000 in any 12-month period. Note that the above exemptions are not available in respect of an applica- tion for admission to trading on an EU regulated market. Member states will not be able to al- low any offer of securities to be made to the public within their territories without prior publication of a prospectus (Article 3(1), Directive). Given the broad definition of a public offer, and the absence of clear lan- guage in the Directive, there has been some discussion as to exactly what this requirement means for secondary market trading of listed securities. Un- der the broadest interpretation, any re- sale of listed securities would require a further prospectus or its own exemp- tion. This interpretation would place either: • An onerous obligation on investors to file and publish a prospectus; or Illustration: Liz Couldwell PLCGLOBAL COUNSEL • JUNE 2004 • www.practicallaw.com/aboutglobal 29 (C) Legal & Commercial Publishing Ltd 2004. This article first appeared in the June 2004 issue of PLC Global Counsel and is reproduced with the permission of the publisher. Please see www.practicallaw.com/aboutglobal for more details. SECURITIES REGULATION: PROSPECTUS DIRECTIVE The Lamfalussy process and CESR’s role The legislative process followed by the Prospectus Directive (2003/71/EC) is the so-called “Lamfalussy process”, which pro- motes a four-level approach to harmonisation of financial services regulation throughout the EU: Level 1 Directives set out the broad framework principles and the European Commission’s powers to implement level 2 technical measures. Level 2 Measures implementing the directives adopted by the Commission with the prior approval of the European Securities Committee (comprised of high-ranking officials of member state governments), or in cer- tain cases by the EU Council of Ministers and based on the advice of the Committee of European Securities Regu- lators (CESR), an advisory committee comprised of representatives of member states’ national regulators. Level 3 Strengthened co-operation between the competent authorities of the member states under the auspices of CESR to achieve a uniform application of EC regulation across the EU. Level 4 Strengthened enforcement by the Commission to ensure member state compliance with EC legislation. On 4 March 2004 CESR began the consultation process for the creation of guidelines on the disclosure requirements con- tained in the Prospectus Regulation (Regulation 809/2004/EC), with the objective of ensuring consistent application throughout the EU. These guidelines, if CESR concludes they are necessary, will constitute level 3 measures and are in- tended to be completed by December 2004. • An obligation to transfer the secu- Admission to trading of securities ing on an EU regulated market (but rities pursuant to a separate exempt The Directive uses the term “admis- note that these exemptions are not public offer, which would be un- sion to trading on a regulated market” available in respect of an offer of se- workable in the context of anony- (as defined by reference to the Invest- curities to the public). mous dealer trading systems where ment Services Directive (93/22/EEC)), the identity and number of ultimate rather than the concept of “admission Format counter-parties are not known. to official listing” contained in the CARD. Regulated markets will in- A prospectus must consist of three One alternative, and preferable, in- clude the major EU stock exchanges, principal components, which can be terpretation is that the provisions re- but may also include other markets de- combined in a single prospectus or lating to prospectuses for public of- signed for small- and medium-sized is- kept separate: fers (including the restriction on suers where securities currently may resale of securities initially sold in an not be regarded as “admitted to offi- • A summary. This must, briefly and exempt public offer) are not applica- cial listing.” Member states will each in a non-technical manner, convey ble if the securities are or will be ad- provide a list of regulated markets the essential characteristics and risks mitted to trading on an EU regulated within their jurisdiction. The inclu- associated with the issuer, any guar- market. Under this interpretation, sion of these smaller markets will sig- antor and the securities. the provisions requiring a prospec- nificantly increase the costs of a listing tus for an application for admission for small- and medium-sized issuers, • A registration document. This to trading would apply instead (see as the disclosure requirements for a must contain information relating to below Admission to trading of secu- listing on these markets will become the issuer. rities) and sellers in the secondary similar to those applicable to a listing market could ignore the restrictions on a main stock exchange. • A securities note. This must pro- on public offers. If the securities vide details of the securities to be of- were not admitted to trading on an In certain cases, where the class of fered or admitted to trading. EU regulated market, a prospectus securities is already admitted to would only be required for a subse- trading on a regulated market, appli- (Article 5(3), Directive.) quent resale where the original offer cations for admission to trading may was an exempt public offer. This benefit from an exemption from the This tri-partite format facilitates the would effectively maintain the cur- obligation to file and publish a shelf-registration system introduced rent position in many EU member prospectus, including where the ad- by the Directive. Under this system, states. It remains to be seen whether mission to trading is for less than registration documents that have al- this interpretation will be confirmed 10% of the number of shares of the ready been approved and filed with by implementing legislation.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Initial Public Offerings
    November 2017 Initial Public Offerings An Issuer’s Guide (US Edition) Contents INTRODUCTION 1 What Are the Potential Benefits of Conducting an IPO? 1 What Are the Potential Costs and Other Potential Downsides of Conducting an IPO? 1 Is Your Company Ready for an IPO? 2 GETTING READY 3 Are Changes Needed in the Company’s Capital Structure or Relationships with Its Key Stockholders or Other Related Parties? 3 What Is the Right Corporate Governance Structure for the Company Post-IPO? 5 Are the Company’s Existing Financial Statements Suitable? 6 Are the Company’s Pre-IPO Equity Awards Problematic? 6 How Should Investor Relations Be Handled? 7 Which Securities Exchange to List On? 8 OFFER STRUCTURE 9 Offer Size 9 Primary vs. Secondary Shares 9 Allocation—Institutional vs. Retail 9 KEY DOCUMENTS 11 Registration Statement 11 Form 8-A – Exchange Act Registration Statement 19 Underwriting Agreement 20 Lock-Up Agreements 21 Legal Opinions and Negative Assurance Letters 22 Comfort Letters 22 Engagement Letter with the Underwriters 23 KEY PARTIES 24 Issuer 24 Selling Stockholders 24 Management of the Issuer 24 Auditors 24 Underwriters 24 Legal Advisers 25 Other Parties 25 i Initial Public Offerings THE IPO PROCESS 26 Organizational or “Kick-Off” Meeting 26 The Due Diligence Review 26 Drafting Responsibility and Drafting Sessions 27 Filing with the SEC, FINRA, a Securities Exchange and the State Securities Commissions 27 SEC Review 29 Book-Building and Roadshow 30 Price Determination 30 Allocation and Settlement or Closing 31 Publicity Considerations
    [Show full text]
  • Registration Statement Under Securities Act of 1933
    UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OMB APPROVAL OMB Number: 3235-0065 Washington, D.C. 20549 Expires: October 31, 2021 Estimated average burden FORM S-1 hours per response ............653.54 REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) (Primary Standard Industrial Classification Code Number) (I.R.S. Employer Identification Number) (Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of registrant’s principal executive offices) (Name, address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of agent for service) (Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the public) If any of the securities being registered on this Form are to be offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933 check the following box: If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, please check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering.
    [Show full text]
  • Class Action Complaint
    1 Laurence M. Rosen, Esq. (SBN 219683) THE ROSEN LAW FIRM, P.A. 2 FI fL tE B 355 South Grand Avenue, Suite 2450 . AN MATEO COUNTY Los Angeles, CA 90071 3 Telephone: (213) 785-2610 4 Facsimile: (213) 226-4684 Email: [email protected] 5 SARRAF GENTILE LLP 6 Ronen Sarraf . Joseph Gentile 7 14 Bond Street, Suite 212 8 Great Neck, New York (516) 699-8890 9 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 10 11 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 12 COUNTY OF SAN MATEO 18 e , v8 2 2 ~ 8 m 13 ~----------- OHNNY HOSEY and GEORGE SHILLIARE, ) Case No.: _______ -< 14 ndividually and on behalf of all others similarly ) 'T1 ituated, ) )> 15 ) CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT )< Plaintiffs, ) 16 ) s. ) 17 I I ) RICHARD 9,osTOLO, MIKE.,,PUPTA, LUCA ) DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL 18 BARATTA, JACK DORSEY, BETER ) CHERNIN, :PETER CURRIE(I>ETER" ) 19 FENTON,1)AVIDROSENBLATT:'EVAN / ) ) 20 WJLLIAMS, GOLDMAN, SACHS & CO., -'/ ) MORGAN STANLEY & CO. LkC, J.P. 1/ I ) 21 MORGAN SECURITIES LLC,"TWITTER, ) /1~-CIV0;228 ... INC., MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER ) I CMP i Complaint Filed 22 & SMITH INCORPORATElt), DEUTSCHE ) BANK SECURITIES INC./ALLEN & ) 23 COMPANY LLC, and CODE ADVISORS LLC, ) ) ; 1i1111111111111111111rnm1 ~ 24 ) 25 26 27 28 COMPLAINT Plaintiffs Johnny Hosey ("Hosey") and George Shilliare ("Shilliare")( collectively 2 "Plaintiffs") make the following allegations, individually and on behalf of all others similarly 3 situated, based upon the investigation by Plaintiffs' counsel, which included among other things, an 4 analysis of publicly available news articles, reports, corporate webcasts with analysts, public filings 5 made with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"), and securities analysts' reports about 6 Twitter, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Security Prospectus
    Security Prospectus Issue of DX1S Token by DXone Ltd. ISIN LI0550102979 This Securities Prospectus was approved by the Liechtenstein Financial Market Authority on 18.06.2020 and is valid until 17.06.2021. In case of significant new factors, material mistakes or material inaccuracies the Issuer is obliged to establish a supplement to the Prospectus. The Issuers obligation to supplement a prospectus does not apply when a prospectus is no longer valid. 2 Index I. Summary .............................................................................................................................................. 5 Introduction and Warnings ............................................................................................................. 5 Key Information on the Issuer ........................................................................................................ 5 Key Information on the Securities .................................................................................................. 7 Key Information on the offer of the Notes to the Public .............................................................. 10 a) Offer Period ............................................................................................................................... 10 b) Conditions .................................................................................................................................. 10 c) Issue Price .................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Base Prospectus
    Base prospectus Final Terms for ISIN NO0010868318 Tomra Systems ASA FRN Senior Unsecured Open Bond Issue 2019/2022 Final Terms and the Base Prospectus dated 5 March 2020 together constitute the Base Prospectus for NO0010868318 Tomra Systems ASA FRN Senior Unsecured Open Bond Issue 2019/2022. The Base Prospectus contains complete information about the Issuer and the bond issue. The Base Prospectus is available on the Issuer's website https://www.tomra.com, or on the Issuer's visit address, Drengsrudhagen 2, 1385 Asker, or their successor (s). Asker/Oslo, 17 March 2020 Tomra Systems ASA Final Terms - Tomra Systems ASA FRN Senior Unsecured Open Bond Issue 2019/2022 ISIN NO0010868318 Terms used herein shall be deemed to be defined as such for the purposes of the conditions set forth in the Base Prospectus clause 2 Definition, 15.1.2 Definition and in the attached Bond Terms for each bond issue. Set out below is the form of Final Terms which will be completed for each bond issue which are issued under the Base Prospectus. MiFID II product governance / Retail investors, professional investors and ECPs target market – Solely for the purposes of each manufacturer’s product approval process, the target market assessment in respect of the notes has led to the conclusion that: (i) the target market for the notes is eligible counterparties, professional clients and retail clients each as defined in Directive 2014/65/EU (as amended, “MiFID II”); (ii) all channels for distribution to eligible counterparties and professional clients are appropriate; and (iii) the following channels for distribution of the notes to retail clients are appropriate – investment advice, portfolio management, non-advised sales and pure execution services – subject to the distributor’s suitability and appropriateness obligations under MiFID II, as applicable.
    [Show full text]
  • Upsizing and Downsizing Your IPO
    Upsizing and Downsizing Your IPO Posted by Charles M. Nathan, Latham & Watkins LLP, on Thursday July 29, 2010 Editor’s Note: Charles Nathan is Of Counsel at Latham & Watkins LLP and is co-chair of the firm’s Corporate Governance Task Force. This post is based on a Latham & Watkins Client Alert by Brian G. Cartwright, Alexander F. Cohen, Kirk A. Davenport and Joel H. Trotter. The reds have been printed; the deal is on the road; and the champagne is on ice. Now, all that is left is for the IPO investors to step up and buy the stock. It’s a tempting moment to relax — but an experienced deal lawyer knows better. This is the time to start preparing for the possibility that the deal will be wildly oversubscribed or will struggle mightily. In either case, the question that will shortly come your way is ―How much can the deal be upsized or downsized at pricing?‖ To answer that seemingly simple question, you will need to break it into three component parts: Was your registration statement accurate and complete as of the time it became effective? Have you provided investors with all the information they need to make an informed investment decision prior to confirming orders? Do you owe the SEC any additional filing fees? Getting to the bottom of these points is a surprisingly complex undertaking. The rules in this area are technical and not always intuitive, and you may be asked to make some difficult judgment calls under significant time pressure. The purpose of this Client Alert is to provide you with the tools you need to react quickly and wisely to questions about pricing outside the range when the moment of truth arrives.
    [Show full text]
  • United States
    Equity Capital Markets 2006/07 Country Q&A United States United States Stephen Giove, Danielle Carbone and Ferdinand Erker, Shearman & Sterling LLP www.practicallaw.com/0-203-1882 EQUITY CAPITAL MARKETS: GENERAL Requirements for registration 1. Please give a brief overview of the equity market in your ju- Public offerings of securities must be registered under the risdiction. Has it been active? What were the large deals over Securities Act of 1933 (Securities Act). Registration is the past year? accomplished by publicly filing a registration statement with the SEC and the SEC declaring the registration statement effective. A registration statement contains two parts: Overall activity in the US equity markets has increased signif- icantly over the last several years. Although there were fewer ■ A prospectus, which is the main marketing document for the than 90 initial public offerings (IPOs) in 2003, there were offering (see Questions 8 to 12). more than 200 in each of 2004 and 2005. The aggregate value of IPOs has also increased significantly, from over ■ Other technical information that is made public but is not US$17 billion (about EUR13.5 billion) in 2003 to more than distributed to investors, including undertakings by the com- US$36 billion (about EUR28.5 billion) in 2005, although pany and exhibits. 2005 was down from more than US$46 billion (about EUR36.4 billion) offered in 2004. The results for the first half If the offered securities will be listed on an exchange, a separate of 2006 − over 100 completed IPOs with an aggregate value registration statement must be filed with the SEC under the of over US$20 billion (about EUR15.87 billion) − are slightly Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act).
    [Show full text]
  • Existing Regulatory Protections Unchanged by Either H.R. 3606 Or S. 1933
    EXISTING REGULATORY PROTECTIONS UNCHANGED BY EITHER H.R. 3606 OR S. 1933 These protections apply to ALL public companies, including Emerging Growth Companies * I. GENERAL ANTI-FRAUD PROVISIONS A. Duty to Disclose All Material Information – Rule 12b-20 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) requires that companies must, in addition to providing the information expressly required in a report or other statement to the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), include any additional material information that may be necessary to make the required statements not misleading in light of the circumstances. B. Liability for False and Misleading Statements – Section 18 of the Exchange Act imposes liability for false and misleading statements in documents filed with the SEC to any person who makes such false or misleading statements, subject to applicable defenses. C. Exchange Act Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5 – These provisions broadly prohibit fraudulent and deceptive practices and untrue statements or omissions of material facts in connection with the purchase or sale of any security. Unlike Section 18, these provisions apply to any information released to the public by the issuer and its subsidiaries, including press releases and annual and quarterly reports to shareholders. D. Executive Officer Certification of Reports and Financial Statements – As discussed in more detail below, a company’s certifying officers can be held personally liable for any untrue statement of material fact or material omission necessary to ensure that statements contained in the reports or other statements to the SEC are not misleading. E. Control Person Liability – Section 20 of the Exchange Act and Section 15 of the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Securities Act”) provide that a person controlling any person liable under those statutes may be liable jointly and severally and to the same extent as its controlled person for violations of the Exchange Act or the Securities Act.
    [Show full text]
  • Frequently Asked Questions About Initial Public Offerings
    FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT INITIAL PUBLIC OFFERINGS Initial public offerings (“IPOs”) are complex, time-consuming and implicate many different areas of the law and market practices. The following FAQs address important issues but are not likely to answer all of your questions. • Public companies have greater visibility. The media understanding IPOS has greater economic incentive to cover a public company than a private company because of the number of investors seeking information about their What is an IPO? investment. An “IPO” is the initial public offering by a company • Going public allows a company’s employees to of its securities, most often its common stock. In the share in its growth and success through stock united States, these offerings are generally registered options and other equity-based compensation under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the structures that benefit from a more liquid stock with “Securities Act”), and the shares are often but not an independently determined fair market value. A always listed on a national securities exchange such public company may also use its equity to attract as the new York Stock exchange (the “nYSe”), the and retain management and key personnel. nYSe American LLC or one of the nasdaq markets (“nasdaq” and, collectively, the “exchanges”). The What are disadvantages of going public? process of “going public” is complex and expensive. • The IPO process is expensive. The legal, accounting upon the completion of an IPO, a company becomes and printing costs are significant and these costs a “public company,” subject to all of the regulations will have to be paid regardless of whether an IPO is applicable to public companies, including those of successful.
    [Show full text]
  • Federated Hermes Project and Trade Finance Tender Fund
    Prospectus May 31, 2021 Federated Hermes Project and Trade Finance Tender Fund Investment objective. Federated Hermes Project and Trade Finance Tender Fund (the “Fund”) commenced operations on December 7, 2016, and is a continuously offered, non-diversified, closed-end management investment company. The Fund’s investment objective is to provide total return primarily from income. The Fund pursues its investment objective primarily by investing in trade finance, structured trade, export finance, import finance, supply chain financing and project finance assets of entities, including sovereign entities (“trade finance related securities”). Trade finance related securities will be located primarily in, or have exposure to, global emerging markets. Trade finance transactions refer to the capital needed to buy or sell, import or export, products or other tangible goods. Project finance transactions are typically used to build something tangible or to expand existing plant capacity to produce more goods for trade; and the Fund typically invests in project finance deals when the project has been largely completed and goods are being produced for export (i.e., transactions are of a short-term nature). No assurance can be given that the Fund’s investment objective will be achieved. As of January 1, 2021, paper copies of the Fund’s shareholder reports will no longer be sent by mail. Instead, the reports will be made available on FederatedInvestors.com/FundInformation, and you will be notified and provided with a link each time a report is posted to the website. You may request to receive paper reports from the Fund or from your financial intermediary, free of charge, at any time.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report
    Final Report On draft Regulatory Technical Standards on major shareholdings and an indicative list of financial instruments subject to notification requirements under the revised Transparency Directive 29 September 2014 | 2014/1187 Table of Contents I. Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................................... 5 II. Background .................................................................................................................................................... 6 II.I Mandates and consultation process .................................................................................................... 6 II.II Elements of the Final Report .............................................................................................................. 6 III. Summary of the feedback and amendments to the draft RTS .................................................................... 8 III.I Draft RTS on the calculation method of the 5 % threshold referred to in the Article 9(5) and (6) exemptions of the TD .................................................................................................................... 8 III.I.a Horizontal aggregation – Aggregation of different categories of holdings (Article 9, 10 and 13 of the revised TD) ................................................................................................................ 9 III.I.b Vertical aggregation – Aggregation of holdings of financial instruments within
    [Show full text]
  • Establishment of New Disclosure Regime in the European Union
    Update: Establishment of New Disclosure Regime in the European Union In 2000, the European Union adopted a strategic plan, referred to as the Financial Services Action Plan, to create a single financial services market and facilitate the widest possible access to capital within the EU. One of the key elements of the Financial Services Action Plan is the establishment of a new EU-wide disclosure regime. The EU is in the process of passing legislation to set the regulatory framework for the new disclosure regime. The EU actions will change the requirements that capital market participants – issuers and financial intermediaries alike – will be required to meet in order to access the capital markets in the EU. The actions will impact the nature of disclosure that must be provided in connection with the offering or listing of securities and the nature of the disclosure that will be required on an ongoing basis. The actions also seek to provide greater transparency by mandating that financial statements in prospectuses and periodic reports be prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards adopted by the EU (which will preempt the use of local European GAAP regimes) (“IFRS”) or an “equivalent standard” (yet to be defined). The new disclosure regime has four key elements: • the Prospectus Directive, which generally will require any issuer to publish an approved prospectus (including financial statements prepared or restated in IFRS or an “equivalent standard”) in connection with a public offering in the EU or a listing
    [Show full text]