DOCSLIB.ORG

Texas Potato Breeding Report 2019

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Texas Potato Breeding Report 2019 Texas Potato Breeding Report 2019 The Texas A&M AgriLife Research Department of Horticultural Sciences Texas A&M University Isabel Vales, Creighton Miller, Douglas Scheuring, and Jeff Koym College Station and Lubbock J. Creighton Miller, Jr March 6, 1940 – November 3, 2019 Creighton began his career at the Lubbock Center in 1972 and started the Texas Potato Breeding and Variety Development Program from scratch. Creighton released or co-released 19 potato varieties, one mungbean, and two cowpea varieties Creighton released four highly successful, widely adapted Russet Norkotah strain selections. His last two russet releases (Reveille Russet and Vanguard Russet) continue to gain in popularity. He was a mentor to almost all in the potato research community and friend to many in the industry. His impact on the potato world will be felt for years to come. Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................................................................. iii Mission Statement ............................................................................................................................................................... 1 Impact Statement ................................................................................................................................................................ 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Springlake Trials, 2019 ....................................................................................................................................................... 8 Western and Southwestern Regional Trials ................................................................................................................... 11 Western and Southwestern Regional Russet Trial, Springlake .................................................................................... 11 Western and Southwestern Regional Red Trial, Springlake ........................................................................................ 21 Western and Southwestern Regional White/Yellow Trial, Springlake ........................................................................ 28 Texas Advanced Russet Trial, Springlake ...................................................................................................................... 35 Texas Advanced Red/Specialty Trial, Springlake .......................................................................................................... 42 Texas Advanced White/Yellow Trial, Springlake .......................................................................................................... 51 2019 Dalhart Trials ........................................................................................................................................................... 58 Western and Southwestern Regional Chip Trial, Dalhart ............................................................................................ 63 Western Regional and Texas Advanced Russet Trial, Dalhart..................................................................................... 72 Western Regional Red/Specialty Trial, Dalhart ............................................................................................................. 80 Western Regional and Texas Advanced White/Yellow Trial, Dalhart ......................................................................... 87 Texas Advanced Chip Selection Trial, Dalhart .............................................................................................................. 94 2019 4 Hill Chip Selections Trial, Dalhart .................................................................................................................... 106 Texas Advanced Russet Selection Trial, Dalhart ......................................................................................................... 108 2019 4 Hill Russet Selections Trial, Dalhart ................................................................................................................. 116 Texas Advanced Red/Specialty Selection Trial, Dalhart ............................................................................................. 118 2019 4 Hill Red/Specialty Selections Trial, Dalhart ..................................................................................................... 128 Texas Advanced White/Yellow Selection Trial, Dalhart ............................................................................................. 130 2019 4 Hill White/Yellow Selections Trial, Dalhart ..................................................................................................... 137 Appendix A. General notes on potato varieties or selections- 2019 ............................................................................ 139 Appendix B. Parentage of potato varieties or selections-2019 .................................................................................... 179 Appendix C. Disposition of Clones ................................................................................................................................ 189 Index of Varieties and Clones ........................................................................................................................................ 193 i Mention of a trade name or proprietary product does not constitute a guarantee or warranty of the product by Texas A&M AgriLife Research and does not imply its approval to the exclusion of other products that also may be suitable. This publication reports research involving pesticides. It does not contain recommendations for their use, nor does it imply that the uses discussed here have been registered. Appropriate state and federal agencies must register all uses of pesticides before they can be recommended. Commercial companies are mentioned in this publication solely for providing specific information. Mention of a company does not constitute a guarantee or warranty of its products by Texas A&M AgriLife Research or an endorsement over products of other companies not mentioned. All programs, activities, information, services and facilities of Texas A&M AgriLife Research are available to everyone without regard to race, color, religion, sex, age, national origin, or physical or mental handicap. ii Acknowledgements This work was conducted at the Texas A&M AgriLife Research and Extension Center at Lubbock, the Department of Horticultural Sciences, College Station, and at field sites Springlake, Dalhart, and Weslaco. Financial support for this work was partially provided by the Texas A&M AgriLife Research, USDA/NIFA Special Research Grants Program- Potato Research (Agreement # 2017-34141-27336), Potatoes USA, USDA/SCRI, T3 AgriLife, and Vegetable Strategic Initiative, Texas Vegetable Seed Grant. Bruce Barrett, Springlake Potato Sales, donated ten acres for growth of first year seedlings and advanced selections/variety trials near Springlake. Milt Carter, CSS Farms, donated seven acres for growth of first year seedlings and advanced selections/variety trials near Dalhart. Texas Cooperators: Luis Cisneros-Zevallos, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas Terry Wheeler, Texas A&M AgriLife Research, Lubbock, Texas Russell Wallace, Texas A&M AgriLife Extension, Lubbock, Texas Ismael Badillo, Thiago Marconi, Kranthi Maudadi, Jorge da Silva and Adrian Silva, Texas A&M AgriLife Research, Weslaco, Texas Charlie Rush and Fekede Workneh, Texas A&M AgriLife Research, Amarillo, Texas Cecilia Tamboringuy, Jeanmarie Verchot, Keerti Rathore, Oscar Riera-Lizarazu, Julien Levy, and Betsy Pierson, Texas AgriLife Research, College Station, Texas Vijay Joshi, Texas A&M AgriLife Research, Uvalde, Texas AgriGenomics Lab, Soil and Forage Testing Lab, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX Western Regional Cooperators: Rob Wilson, Kevin Nicholson, and Darrin Culp, Tulelake, California David Holm, Caroline Grey, Katie Gaudreau, Sastry Jayanty, and Samuel Essah, Center, Colorado Rich Novy, Jonathan Whitworth, and Brian Schneider, Aberdeen, Idaho Jeff Stark, Chelsey Lowder, University of Idaho, Aberdeen, Idaho Brain Charlton, Klamath Falls, Oregon Clint Shock, Malheur, Oregon Rick Knowles and Mark Pavek, Pullman, Washington Max Felsman and Roy Navarre, Prosser, Washington Southwestern Regional Cooperators: Jaspreet Sidhu, Joe Nunez, and Jed DuBose, Bakersfield, California iii Rob Wilson, Kevin Nicholson, and Darrin Culp, Tulelake, California David Holm, Caroline Grey, Katie Goudreau, and Samuel Essah, Center, Colorado NCPT Cooperators: Rich Novy, Brian Schneider, and Jonathan Whitworth, USDA-ARS, Aberdeen, Idaho David Holm, Carolyn Keller, Caroline Grey, Katie Gaudreau , Sastry Jayanty, Samuel Essah, and Andrew Houser, Colorado State University, San Luis Valley Research Center, Center, Colorado Susie Thompson, Gary A. Secor, and Neil Gudmestad, North Dakota State University, Fargo, North Dakota Sagar Sathuvalli and Solomon Yilma, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon Shelley Jansky and Andy Hamernik, USDA-ARS, Madison, Wisconsin Darrin Haagenson, USDA-ARS, East Grand Forks, Minnesota Laura Shannon, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota David Douches, Joseph Coombs, Chris Long, Trina Zavislan, and Willie Kirk, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan Craig Yencho and Mark Clough, North Carolina State University, Raleigh,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Potato (Solanum Tuberosum L.)
    United Kingdom National List / Plant Breeders’ Rights Technical Protocol for the Official Examination of Distinctness, Uniformity, and Stability (DUS) Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) February 2020 Contents Section A - General Information ..................................................................................................... 1 1 Purpose ............................................................................................................................. 1 2 Scope ................................................................................................................................ 1 3 Responsibilities ................................................................................................................. 1 4 Non Compliance with the Protocol .................................................................................... 3 5 Responsibility for GM Releases ........................................................................................ 3 6 Procedures for GM Varieties ............................................................................................. 3 7 Associated Documents ...................................................................................................... 4 Section B – Application Requirements ........................................................................................... 5 1 Purpose ............................................................................................................................. 5 2 Scope ...............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Crop Production
    Crop Production ISSN: 1936-3737 Released September 12, 2011, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS), Agricultural Statistics Board, United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). Corn Production Down 3 Percent from August Forecast Soybean Production Up 1 Percent Cotton Production Up Fractionally Corn production is forecast at 12.5 billion bushels, down 3 percent from the August forecast but up fractionally from 2010. If realized, this will be the third largest production total on record for the United States. Based on conditions as of September 1, yields are expected to average 148.1 bushels per acre, down 4.9 bushels from the August 1 forecast and down 4.7 bushels from 2010. If realized, this will be the lowest average yield in the United States since 2005. Soybean production is forecast at 3.09 billion bushels, up 1 percent from August but down 7 percent from last year. Based on September 1 conditions, yields are expected to average 41.8 bushels per acre, up 0.4 bushel from last month but down 1.7 bushels from last year. Compared with last month, yield forecasts are higher in the Central Great Plains and along much of the Atlantic Coast. If realized, the forecasted yield in Nebraska will be a record high. Yield forecasts are below last month across the Southern Great Plains and portions of the Southeast as hot, dry conditions persisted during August. Area for harvest in the United States is forecast at 73.8 million acres, unchanged from August but down 4 percent from 2010. All cotton production is forecast at 16.6 million 480-pound bales, up fractionally from last month but down 9 percent from last year.
    [Show full text]
  • Dissertation Effect of Farm to Fork Operations On
    DISSERTATION EFFECT OF FARM TO FORK OPERATIONS ON BIOACTIVE COMPOUNDS IN WHITE-FLESHED AND COLOR-FLESHED POTATOES Submitted by Fauzi Saleh Massoud Amer Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition In partial fulfillment of the requirements For the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Colorado State University Fort Collins, Colorado Summer 2015 Doctoral Committee: Advisor: Jairam Vanamala Co-Advisor: Martha Stone Lavanya Reddivari David Holm Copyright by Fauzi Saleh Massoud Amer 2015 All Rights Reserved ABSTRACT EFFECT OF FARM TO FORK OPERATIONS ON BIOACTIVE COMPOUNDS IN WHITE- FLESHED AND COLOR-FLESHED POTATOES The potato, Solanum tuberosum L., is one of the most commonly consumed food crops worldwide, and is the leading vegetable crop in the United States with 69% of per capita consumption as processed potatoes. In addition to micro- and macro-nutrients, color-fleshed potatoes are one of the richest plant sources for health promoting components such as resistant starch, polyphenols, and carotenoids. In contrast, potatoes are well known to contain naturally occurring glycoalkaloids (GA; α-chaconine and α-solanine) and processing-induced acrylamide (AL). Potatoes can be stored up to one year before being processed/consumed and the effect of genotype, storage (4oC or 10oC; 3 or 6 months) and processing (baking and frying) on both toxic and health beneficial compounds remains unknown. We hypothesized that cultivar, storage and processing alters bioactive content in potato tuber and potato products. To test this hypothesis, raw, baked, and chipped of white-, yellow-, red-, and purple-fleshed potatoes from initial (fresh) and stored tubers were evaluated for AL/vitamin C and GAs using Ultra Performance Liquid Chromatography (UPLC) and High Performance Liquid Chromatography-Diode Array Detector (HPLC-DAD/UPLC-DAD), respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • 2013 Potato Statistical Yearbook · May 2013 1 Message from the President
    Contents Section 1— NPC Year in Review, U.S. POTATO PRICING, CONSUMPTION, AND UTILIZATION Issues, and Resolutions U.S. Monthly and Season-Average Grower Price .............. 70 Message from the NPC President.......................... 2 U.S. Monthly Retail Price ............................... 71 Message from the NPC Executive Vice President and CEO........ 3 Farm Marketings of All Potatoes.......................... 71 NPC Year in Review.................................... 4 Quantity of Potatoes Used for Processing . 72 NPC Resolutions ..................................... 13 Number of Chip and Shoestring Plants and Quantity Used ...... 73 Marketing Year Average Price Received for Potatoes . 74 Section 2—NPC Delegates, U.S. per Capita Utilization of Potatoes...................... 75 Board of Directors, and Committees Utilization of Potatoes ................................. 76 NPC Executive Committee ............................. 22 WORLD POTATO PRODUCTION NPC Board of Directors . 22 World Potato Production ............................... 77 NPC Past Presidents .................................. 23 Selected U.S. Exports ................................. 78 NPC Committees and Subcommittees ..................... 24 Selected U.S. Imports ................................. 78 State Voting Delegates ................................ 26 POTATO QUICK FACTS Section 3—NPC Members and Potato Nutrition...................................... 80 Industry Contacts Potato Production, Consumption, and Exports ................ 81 State Potato Grower Organizations.......................
    [Show full text]
  • Heritage Potato Collection
    Heritage Potato Collection Tony Slater Department of Environment & Primary Industries, Victoria Project Number: PT13009 PT13009 This report is published by Horticulture Australia Ltd to pass on information concerning horticultural research and development undertaken for the potato industry. The research contained in this report was funded by Horticulture Australia Ltd with the financial support of: the potato industry All expressions of opinion are not to be regarded as expressing the opinion of Horticulture Australia Ltd or any authority of the Australian Government. The Company and the Australian Government accept no responsibility for any of the opinions or the accuracy of the information contained in this report and readers should rely upon their own enquiries in making decisions concerning their own interests. ISBN 0 7341 3332 4 Published and distributed by: Horticulture Australia Ltd Level 7 179 Elizabeth Street Sydney NSW 2000 Telephone: (02) 8295 2300 Fax: (02) 8295 2399 © Copyright 2014 Final Report for Horticulture Australia Project No: PT13009 (28th February 2014) Project Title: Heritage Potato Collection Authors: Tony Slater Research Provider: Department of Environment and Primary Industries Victoria Final Report for Horticulture Australia Project No: PT13009 (28th February 2014) Project Title: Heritage potato collection Project Leader: Tony Slater, Department of Environment and Primary Industries AgriBio 5 Ring Road, La Trobe University Bundoora VIC 3083 Phone: 03 9032 7325 Email: [email protected] Other Key Personnel: Funding sources: This project has been funded by HAL using the fresh and processing potato industry levy and matched funds from the Federal Government. Published by the Victorian Government Department of Environment and Primary Industries, February 2014.
    [Show full text]
  • 2011 USA Seed Acres
    2011 Total Certified Seed Accepted Acres - USA Variety AK CA CO ID ME MI MN MT NE ND NY OR WA WI Acres A0008-1TE 0.40 0.01 1.60 2.61 0.20 0.40 5.22 A0012-5 9.00 0.04 9.04 A00324-1 0.10 0.10 A00732 0.10 0.10 0.20 A01010-1 0.20 0.20 A84180-8 0.22 6.08 6.30 A91814-5 11.00 11.00 A95409-1RUS 1.80 1.80 A99326-1PY 0.10 0.00 0.10 0.20 A99331-2RY 0.04 0.04 AC00395-2RU 0.54 0.54 AC01151-5W 0.33 0.33 AC99329-7PW/Y 1.37 1.37 AC99375-1RU 3.45 3.45 903-34 1.75 1.75 915-25 14.01 14.01 Accord 2.00 2.00 Adirondack Blue 11.85 4.45 3.26 19.56 Adirondack Red 0.10 1.06 3.40 0.91 5.47 Adora 9.67 13.10 22.77 Aeggeblomme 0.23 0.23 AF0338-17 0.55 0.55 AF2291-10 0.01 0.01 AF2574-10 0.11 0.11 AF3001-6 0.45 0.45 AF3317-15 0.01 0.01 AF3362-1 0.23 0.23 Agata 312.49 0.01 6.00 318.50 Agila 0.10 0.10 AK114 1.00 1.00 Alasclear 0.10 0.10 Alaska Frostless 0.10 0.10 Alaska Red 0.10 0.10 Alaska Sweetheart 0.10 0.10 Albane 0.12 0.12 Alegria 14.00 44.90 0.61 1.00 0.70 7.00 68.21 Alexandra 0.07 0.02 0.09 All Blue 0.50 2.68 8.80 30.66 4.11 0.82 2.54 2.00 0.11 52.22 All Red 2.40 0.55 2.13 5.08 Allagash 1.00 1.00 Allian 72.77 0.01 72.78 Alpine Russet 103.40 0.11 76.01 53.94 1.93 62.93 9.10 11.25 318.67 Alturas 1395.20 0.01 597.00 149.00 39.00 2180.21 Amarosa 0.10 0.01 4.35 4.46 Ambra 0.70 6.08 6.78 Amey 0.92 0.92 Variety AK CA CO ID ME MI MN MT NE ND NY OR WA WI Acres Ampera 108.26 0.01 108.27 Andover 268.84 32.16 301.00 Annabelle 21.10 21.10 Anuschka 169.43 0.30 0.01 0.30 170.04 Appoline 0.11 0.11 AR98-0 4.62 4.62 AR98-9 0.51 0.51 Asterix 68.30 22.20 90.50 Atlantic 91.00 158.93
    [Show full text]
  • Potato Chronology by Richard E
    A Potato Chronology By Richard E. Tucker 17 September 2013 Copyright © 2013 by Richard E. Tucker Introduction A Potato Chronology is an attempt at a history of potatoes in what is perhaps a new way to do history. It is a simple listing of facts and factoids about potatoes arranged in the manner of an historical timeline limited to one line per entry. Information is constantly being gleaned from primary and secondary sources, including web-based sources. Citations are included for all entries so that those interested can conduct further research on their own. In the beginning this work started with a narrow focus on the potato industry in New York State and, even more specifically, its northern Adirondack Mountain region where Green Mountain seed potatoes were once grown for distribution throughout the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic states. But it quickly became apparent that such a parochial view was limiting and that to truly understand the potato industry and its history, a much broader perspective was needed. So, our focus was widened, and herein one will find facts, statistics, incidents, discoveries, and developments from far-flung places affecting the world of the potato. Each entry represents some small incremental change or fact pertinent to the potato industry. Hopefully, the summation of these entries will give one a cursory understanding of the interconnectedness of world, national, and local influences that have reverberated throughout the potato world over the years. At the same time, we admit our prejudice to promote the New York State potato industry above others, and so we ask forbearance if we seem to do so in an inordinate manner.
    [Show full text]