DOCSLIB.ORG

Document Contents

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Document Contents Document contents Section 1 – Sites Assessment and Methodology Report Section 2 – Rationale for Preferred Allocations and Associated Consultation Question Section 3 – Site Proformas Section 1 Sites Assessment and Methodology Report Essex and Southend-on-Sea Replacement Waste Local Plan Sites Assessment and Methodology Report LUC Methodology, Findings and Recommendations April 2015 ECC and SBC Rationale for Preferred Allocations and Associated Consultation Question May 2015 1 Version Date Version Details Prepared by Checked by Approved by 1 18/12/14 Working Draft Report for Josh Allen Taran Livingston Taran Livingston client comment Chris Green Taran Livingston 2 31/1/15 Final Draft Report Josh Allen Taran Livingston Taran Livingston incorporating client Chris Green comments Jonathan Hill Shontelle Williams Taran Livingston 3 10/03/2015 Final Report incorporating Josh Allen Taran Livingston Taran Livingston further client comments Taran Livingston 4 19/05/2015 Final Report incorporating Josh Allen Taran Livingston Taran Livingston further client comments Taran Livingston 2 LUC Methodology, Findings and Recommendations April 2015 1. Introduction 1.1. Essex County Council (ECC) and Southend-on-Sea Borough Council (SBC) are Waste Planning Authorities (WPAs) and as such, are required to prepare a Waste Local Plan (WLP). ECC and SBC are working jointly to produce a Replacement Waste Local Plan as required under the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act (2004). Once adopted the Waste Local Plan will provide the framework for where new waste development should go and determining planning applications for new waste facilities, and changes to existing waste facilities. The Replacement WLP was formerly called the Waste Development Document or WDD. 1.2. The last key stage in the preparation of the Replacement WLP was the “WDD: Preferred Approach”. This was published in November 2011 for consultation under Regulation 18 of the Town and Country Planning Regulations1 and work was subsequently put “on hold” in spring 2012. 1.3. The purpose of the WDD: Preferred Approach was to outline the WPAs’ preferred policy approach for managing waste within the Plan area. It included the preferred approaches for the spatial vision, strategic objectives, spatial strategy, site allocations, core policies, development management policies and a proposed monitoring framework. 1.4. The WDD: Preferred Approach identified site specific proposals for strategic waste management facilities, drawing on potential sites that were proposed through a Call for Sites exercise in 2011. These sites had been selected through a site selection process that was undertaken internally by the WPAs. 1.5. As a result of significant changes to the policy context for the Waste Local Plan since the Preferred Approach was published, the WPAs decided that a further round of Regulation 18 consultation was required before moving to Regulation 19 (Publication of the Plan). As part of this new consultation stage, it has been necessary to re-evaluate the existing sites that have been considered for inclusion within the Plan, and to consider a number of new sites that were proposed during the Preferred Approach consultation at the end of 2011/early 2012 and during a recent Call for Sites exercise carried out by the WPAs in June 2014. 1.6. LUC was commissioned in 2014 to undertake the assessment of waste proposals on potential sites to identify sites for inclusion in the Essex and Southend-on-Sea Revised Preferred Approach consultation. Structure of this Report 1.7. This Report describes the approach taken to the site assessment process and the findings and recommendations for which sites should be included in the WLP. It is structured as follows: 1 Town and Country Planning (Local Planning) (England) Regulations (2012). 3 Section 2: Methodology – describes the method used to identify and assess potential sites for waste management uses, and to select the most suitable sites for allocation in the WLP. Section 3: Findings – summarises the findings of the site assessment for all the sites considered. Section 4: Conclusions and Recommendations – sets out the conclusions and recommendations of the site assessment process in terms of which sites are considered most suitable for allocation in the WLP. Addendum by ECC / SBC: Setting out the rationale for taking the recommendations forward into the Waste Local Plan: Revised Preferred Approach. The addendum also includes a question for the Revised Preferred Approach consultation around the Site Selection Criteria. 4 2. Methodology 2.1. This section explains the method used for identifying and assessing the suitability of sites that could be allocated for waste uses in the WLP. The identification of potential sites for consideration was undertaken by the WPAs through consultation with the waste industry and landowners . 2.2. In accordance with the National Planning Policy for Waste (NPPW)2, the methodology for selecting preferred sites for allocation in the WLP has been designed to deliver waste capacity requirements likely to arise in the plan area in accordance with the ‘Waste Hierarchy’. The methodology also needs to meet the emerging spatial strategy for the WLP, i.e. to provide a network of waste management facilities across the Plan area proximate to those key settlements generating the most waste and most likely to experience the most growth and change in the future (e.g. Chelmsford, Colchester, Basildon, Harlow and Southend) as well as other smaller centres also identified as growth areas. Opportunities for the co-location of waste facilities and using waste as a resource, including opportunities for the use of waste to create energy, such as heat and/or power, will be supported where appropriate, although the potential for cumulative impacts of waste facilities on nearby communities has been taken into account. In line with the NPPW, allocated sites are also to be located, designed and operated to minimise potential adverse impacts on the general amenity of local communities, the natural and historic environment and the landscape and townscape of Essex and Southend. 2.3. The assessment method was carried out in the following stages: Identification of potential waste sites. Update of Preferred Approach site assessment criteria. Stage 1 – Assessment of all the potential sites against five ‘Exclusionary’ criteria. Stage 2 – Initial assessment of sites which successfully passed Stage 1 to determine whether in the green belt or not, or if suitable in highway terms and/or complies with transport policy. Stage 3 – Detailed assessment of the sites successfully passed Stages 1 and 2 against 12 site selection criteria. Stage 4 – Cross-checking and moderation of all site assessments/scores by ECC to ensure consistency between assessors. Stage 5 – Identification of the most suitable sites which could meet the over-arching spatial strategy for the WLP. 2 National Planning Policy for Waste. DCLG, October 2014: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-planning-policy-for-waste 5 Identification of potential waste sites 2.4. The first task involved identifying the potential waste sites for assessment. Site proposals from three different sources were collated and mapped: Sites previously obtained by the WPA from a Call for Sites exercise in 2011 and published for consultation in the WDD: Preferred Approach in November 2011. Additional Sites proposed during the WDD: Preferred Approach consultation in at the end of 2011. New sites proposed during a recent Call for Sites exercise in May/June 2014. 2.5. Table 1 lists the sites identified for assessment alongside their source, reference code and the City, District or Borough Local Authority in which they are located. Table 1: List of potential sites included in site assessment process Site Site Name City/District/Borough Reference Authority WDD: Preferred Approach Published in November 2011 IWMF1 Stanway Site Colchester IWMF2 Rivenhall Site Braintree IWMF3 Tovi EcoPark (Courtauld Road) Basildon W1 Green Acres, Old Packards Lane, Colchester Wormingford W2 Units 5-7 Hallsford Bridge Ind Est, Brentwood Ongar W3 Basildon WWTW 1, Courtauld Rd Basildon W7 Sandon East Chelmsford W8 Elsenham Uttlesford W9 Great Dunmow Uttlesford W10 Harlow Harlow W12 Ballast Quay, Fingringhoe Colchester W13 Wivenhoe Quarry Plant Area Colchester W14 Alresford Tendring W15 Wellwick, Martins Fm, St Osyth Tendring W16 Eastern Avenue Southend L(i)3R Tile Kiln, Valley Fm, Sible Braintree Hedingham L(i)4R Shellow Cross Fm, Willingale Chelmsford, Epping L(i)5 Sunnymead, Elmstead & Heath Tendring Fms, Alresford L(i)6 Sandon Chelmsford L(i)7 Stanway (Fiveways Fruit Farm) Colchester L(i)8R Armigers Farm Uttlesford L(i)10R Blackley Quarry, Gate Farm Site 1 Chelmsford L(i)13R Wellwick, Martins Fm, St Osyth Tendring L(n)1R Slough Fm, Ardleigh - Area 1 Tendring L(n)2R Martell's Tendring 6 L(n)33 Crumps Fm, Lt Canfield Uttlesford Additional Sites Proposed During WDD: Preferred Approach Consultation in Late 2011 W24 Widdington - Hollow Road Uttlesford W25 Fairfield Farm - Fordham Road Colchester W27 Friern Manor - Land South of A127 Basildon, Brentwood L(n)7R Little Bullocks Farm Site A22 Uttlesford L(n)8R Little Bullocks Farm Site A23 Uttlesford New Sites Proposed During June 2014 Call for Sites Exercise W17 Allens Farm - Wivenhoe Road, Tendring Colchester, CO7 7BN W18 Batemans Farm - Lynderswood Braintree, Chelmsford Lane W19 Hastingwood - London Road Harlow W20 Courtauld Road, Burnt Mills Basildon L(i)16 Dollymans Farm - Doublegate
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Tilbury to Southend-On-Sea
    Coastal Access – Tilbury to Southend-on-Sea November 2020 Contents: 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 1 2. Background ........................................................................................................................... 1 3. Layout .................................................................................................................................... 1 4. Representations and Natural England’s comments on them ................................................. 2 5. Supporting documents ......................................................................................................... 15 1. Introduction This document records the representations Natural England has received on this compendium of reports from persons or bodies. It also sets out any Natural England comments on these representations. 2. Background Natural England’s compendium of reports setting out its proposals for improved access to the coast from Tilbury to Southend-on-Sea, comprising an overview and five separate length reports, was submitted to the Secretary of State on 27 February 2020. This began an eight- week period during which representations and objections about each constituent report could be made. In total, Natural England received nine representations pertaining to the Tilbury to Southend-on- Sea stretch, of which five were made by organisations or individuals whose representations must be sent in full to the Secretary
    [Show full text]
  • RSPB South East Essex Local Group Independent Lady Birders the Ilbs
    RSPB South East Essex Local Group Independent Lady Birders the ILBs Newsletter 22 The twenty second meeting of the ILBs’ was held on 18 December 2018 at The Royal Oak, Great Stambridge Rochford where 20 ladies plus Kris & Graham Mee had a fabulous Christmas Meal. A big thank you goes to the sponsor of this year’s goody bags. Indoor Meeting 5/12/2018 thanks to Rita Merrick: - Bill Coster presented his pre-recorded talk on Shetland Isles with excellent pictures, accompanied with music and bird calls, to help us differentiate between our own country's species. A special treat being the Red- necked Phalarope not often seen in its breeding plumage - the female is more spectacular than the male! Talk included Black Guillemot, Puffins, Great Skua, Arctic Terns beside our common birds. Local Sightings: - Ring tailed Hen Harrier, Marsh Harriers and Short-eared Owl have been seen regularly throughout December at Wallasea Yellow hammer at Fobbing Marsh/Coryton. Field Trips –9/12/2018 EWT Tollesbury Wick, a cold, partly cloudy walk, eight people attended 52 species were seen. 17/12/2018 Stambridge Mill to the Trout Fisheries, a sunny, mild day, 14 people including 1 ILB attended but only 10 plus the ILB completed the whole walk. 54 species were seen including a gold crest in the hedge at the layby near the fisheries. EWT meeting on 13 December was not the orchid talk expected but a thought-provoking presentation by Lauren Hollas, a volunteer for Surfers against Sewage (www.sas.org.uk). This organisation was started in May 1990 as a result of the chronic sewage pollution in the oceans.
    [Show full text]
  • Buglife Ditches Report Vol1
    The ecological status of ditch systems An investigation into the current status of the aquatic invertebrate and plant communities of grazing marsh ditch systems in England and Wales Technical Report Volume 1 Summary of methods and major findings C.M. Drake N.F Stewart M.A. Palmer V.L. Kindemba September 2010 Buglife – The Invertebrate Conservation Trust 1 Little whirlpool ram’s-horn snail ( Anisus vorticulus ) © Roger Key This report should be cited as: Drake, C.M, Stewart, N.F., Palmer, M.A. & Kindemba, V. L. (2010) The ecological status of ditch systems: an investigation into the current status of the aquatic invertebrate and plant communities of grazing marsh ditch systems in England and Wales. Technical Report. Buglife – The Invertebrate Conservation Trust, Peterborough. ISBN: 1-904878-98-8 2 Contents Volume 1 Acknowledgements 5 Executive summary 6 1 Introduction 8 1.1 The national context 8 1.2 Previous relevant studies 8 1.3 The core project 9 1.4 Companion projects 10 2 Overview of methods 12 2.1 Site selection 12 2.2 Survey coverage 14 2.3 Field survey methods 17 2.4 Data storage 17 2.5 Classification and evaluation techniques 19 2.6 Repeat sampling of ditches in Somerset 19 2.7 Investigation of change over time 20 3 Botanical classification of ditches 21 3.1 Methods 21 3.2 Results 22 3.3 Explanatory environmental variables and vegetation characteristics 26 3.4 Comparison with previous ditch vegetation classifications 30 3.5 Affinities with the National Vegetation Classification 32 Botanical classification of ditches: key points
    [Show full text]
  • Petroplus, Land Part of Area 418. Coryton Refinery, the Manorway, Stanford-Le-Hope
    Planning Committee 14 January 2016 Application Reference: 15/00877/FUL Reference: Site: 15/00877/FUL Petroplus, land part of Area 418. Coryton Refinery, The Manorway, Stanford-le-Hope Ward: Proposal: Corringham and Full planning permission for the installation and operation of a Fobbing ground mounted solar photovoltaic array to generate electricity of up to 5MW capacity comprising photovoltaic panels, inverters, security fencing and cameras and other associated infrastructure. Plan Number(s): Reference Name Received 15K62-CV-GS-101 Rev. AB Site Location 21.12.15 15K62-CV-GS-104 Rev. AA Site Plan 21.09.15 15K62-EL-LY-101 Rev. AC Layout 21.12.15 15K62-EL-LY-101 A Rev. AB Layout 21.09.15 15K62-EL-LY-101 B Rev. AB Layout 21.09.15 15K62-EL-LY-101 C Rev. AB Layout 21.09.15 15K62-EL-LY-101 D Rev. AB Layout 21.09.15 15K62-HS-LY-104 Rev. AA CCTV Layout & CCTV Pole Details 21.09.15 15K62-CV-FC-103 Rev. AA Fence & Gate Details 21.09.15 15K62-CV-HS-101 Rev. AA Inverter Housing Elevation 21.09.15 15K06-CV-HS-102 Rev. AA Control Cabin Elevation 21.09.15 15K06-CV-HS-103 Rev. AA Storage Container Elevation 21.09.15 15K62-EL-PA-101 Rev. AA PV Array Elevation 21.09.15 15K62-EL-CR-101 Rev. AA Cable Route & PoC 21.09.15 The application is also accompanied by: Design and Access Statement Environmental Statement, including: - Screening Opinion - Layout of the Development - Landscape and Visual Assessment - Preliminary Ecological Assessment - Botanical Survey - Great Crested Newt Survey - Breeding Bird Survey - Reptile Survey - Water Vole Survey - Invertebrate Survey Planning Committee 14 January 2016 Application Reference: 15/00877/FUL - Flood Risk Assessment - Non-Technical Assessment Planning Statement Applicant: Validated: Sun4Net Limited 22 September 2015 Date of expiry: 12 January 2016 Recommendation: Approve subject to conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Grazing Marsh Assemblages and Site Classification Using Invertebrates English Nature Research Reports
    Report Number 579 Grazing marsh assemblages and site classification using invertebrates English Nature Research Reports working today for nature tomorrow English Nature Research Reports Number 579 Grazing marsh assemblages and site classification using invertebrates C. M. Drake 2004 You may reproduce as many additional copies of this report as you like, provided such copies stipulate that copyright remains with English Nature, Northminster House, Peterborough PE1 1UA ISSN 0967-876X © Copyright English Nature 2004 Acknowledgements Many people helped in supplying reports, references and advice for this project: Stephen Parker, Kristoffer Hewitt, Chris McMullon, Chris Gibson, Patrick Robinson, John Jackson and Simon Christian (English Nature); Andy Foster (National Trust); Jeff Edwards (Hampshire County Council); Merle Leeds, Susan Elsom and Rob Drydon (Environment Agency); Martin Harvey, Clive Chatters and Bob Chapman (Hampshire and Isle of Wight Wildlife Trust); Graeme Lyons and Mark Telfer (RSPB); Derek Lott (Leicestershire Museum); and especially individuals who have undertaken some of the work - Andy Godfrey, Mike Edwards, Peter Hodge, Peter Kirby, Martin Willing, Ian Killeen and Rob Driscoll. I apologise to anyone whose data appears to be missing from this report. I am most grateful to Jon Webb of English Nature for providing the opportunity to undertake the analysis. Summary 1. A literature review highlights some of the most important outcomes of many unpublished surveys as well as those in formal publications. 2. 295 species showing high constancy in 41 of surveys aquatic fauna and 31 surveys of ‘terrestrial’ wetland species are given fidelity scores on a three-point scale. 3. Over 180 grazing marshes are ranked for their importance for the grazing marsh assemblage using the importance categories of county, regional, national, or of less than county importance.
    [Show full text]
  • Basildon Borough Council Duty to Cooperate Report V3: Submission March 2019 Contents
    Basildon Borough Council Duty to Cooperate Report V3: Submission March 2019 Contents Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 3 Relevant local authorities and Strategic Planning Policy Context .......................................... 5 Statutory Consultees ............................................................................................................. 6 Political and Strategic Geography ....................................................................................... 10 Identifying and Addressing Strategic Cross Boundary Matters ............................................ 12 South Essex .................................................................................................................... 12 Housing Market Area ................................................................................................... 12 Settlement Coalescence .............................................................................................. 14 Functional Economic Area and Retail Hierarchy .......................................................... 14 Green Infrastructure, Open Spaces and Sports Provision ............................................ 15 Flood Risk Management and Drainage ........................................................................ 16 A127 Corridor .................................................................................................................. 17 Lower Thames Crossing .................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Open Spaces Strategy 2006-2011
    Contents 1. Introduction 1 1.1 Scope of the Strategy 2 1.2 National Agenda for Higher Quality Open Space 2 1.3 Policy Context – National, Regional & Local 3 1.4 Summary 5 2. Profile of Thurrock 6 2.1 Natural Environment 6 2.2 Built Environment 11 2.3 Social-Economic and Demographic Profile 11 3. Research Processes 14 3.1 Why? 14 3.2 Audit of Provision 14 3.3 Community Consultation 16 3.4 Community Views 17 3.4.1 Opens Spaces for all 17 3.4.2 Community Concerns 18 3.5 Identifying Open Spaces for Improvement 20 4. Strategy Research 21 4.1 Parks & Gardens 21 4.2 Country Parks 28 4.3 Natural and Semi Natural Greenspace 29 4.4 Amenity Greenspace 33 4.5 Children’s Play Space 35 4.6 Outdoor Sport Facilities 41 4.7 Allotments 45 4.8 Cemeteries and Churchyards 48 4.9 Urban Space 50 5. Policies 51 5.1 Open Space Standards 52 5.2 Policy Recommendations 54 6. Recommendations 55 7. Making it Happen 55 7.1 Strategic Improvements 55 7.2 Community Involvement 56 7.3 Funding 57 References 58 Appendix 1: Background Research 59 Appendix 2: Converting Standards 59 Appendix 3: Funding 60 Appendix 4: Useful Contacts 72 Map Index Map 1 – Flood Zones 7 Map 2 – Nature Conservation Designations 10 Map 3 – Multiple Deprivation 13 Map 4 – Open Spaces in Thurrock 15 Map 5 – Areas Deficient in Parks and Gardens 27 Map 6 – Areas Deficient in Natural and Semi Natural Greenspace 32 Map 7 – Areas Deficient in Children’s Play Space 40 Map 8 – Areas Deficient in Allotments 47 Acknowledgement: Thurrock Council would like to Thank CABE (Commission for Architecture & the Built Environment) Space’s Enabling Programme for their support throughout the research and Strategy formulation.
    [Show full text]
  • Our Wetland Heritage: an Integrated Approach Towards Managing Coastal Landscapes
    Our Wetland Heritage: An Integrated Approach Towards Managing Coastal Landscapes Stephen Rippon and Adam Wainwright Summary This report summarises the first phase of work on the Arts and Humanities Research Council Knowledge Transfer Fellowship scheme grant Our Wetland Heritage: An Integrated Approach Towards Managing Coastal Landscapes (AHRC ID No.: AH/G016895/1). This is a partnership between the University of Exeter, the RSPB and the Historic Environment Service of Essex County Council, in the proposed nature reserves of the South Essex Marshes, on the north banks of the river Thames east of London. The report describes the sources and methods used to understand the development of the historic landscape – the present pattern of fields, roads, flood defences etc – and provides an outline of the major phases of activity. The overall character of the historic landscape across the study area was remarkably uniform and indicative of a landscape that has been used primarily for pastoral use (albeit with some relatively recent ploughing in a few areas): none of the distinctive evidence for intensive farming in the medieval or early modern periods, that is so common on most other British coastal wetlands, was found although the possibility that late medieval flooding has destroyed or buried this evidence cannot be ruled out. A wide range of sources has enabled the pre-reclamation natural drainage pattern to be reconstructed, leading to the conclusion that until the 17th century the South Essex Marshes were an archipelago of many small islands. The first phase of embankment evident in the historic landscape appears to have been small, localised reclamations that probably date to the medieval period (perhaps the 12th to 14th centuries): originally few in number, and with many having been destroyed by later development, the surviving remains of these early embankments are of very great importance.
    [Show full text]
  • Download the Text Guide
    THAMES ESTUARY PATH: Tilbury Town to Southend ! Introduction There has been a long-term ambition to create a path from Central London, through East London and Essex, to Southend for some time. Over the years numerous parts of the path have been achieved but many gaps remain. In 2008, the cycling and transport charity SUSTRANS carried out a complete survey of the path for the Department of Communities and Local Government (CLG) and this is on the CLG website if you search under “Thames Estuary Path”. The Thames Estuary Path through Essex is an amazing path taking you past Thameside Forts, ancient Churches, through Thames Marshes and along the sea wall over-looking internationally important marshes and mudflats. From Tilbury to Southend it is approximately 30 miles, but the route has the advantage of being shadowed by C2C railway line with stations at Tilbury Town, East Tilbury, Stanford-le-Hope, Pitsea, Benfleet, Leith, Chalkwell and Southend-on-Sea. This enables the walker or cyclist to do “short sections” and returning on the train. The beauty of this route is you can choose to start at one station and walk for as much as you like and then get the train back. The stations are generally 3 to 4 miles or 6 to 8 kms apart. When describing the route the distance from Tilbury Town station is shown in brackets when the path passes subsequent stations. Sensible Precautions All walking is inherently risky and before starting your journey you should consider: • Food and drink • Walking sticks (if necessary) • Sun screen (summer) • Warm and waterproof clothing • Sound footwear especially as many parts of the path are muddy outside summer.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Flood Risk Management Strategy, Appendix D2
    Thurrock Local Flood Risk Management Strategy – Strategic Environmental Assessment Scoping Report March 2015 Thurrock Council Civic Offices New Road Grays Essex RM17 6SL JBA Project Manager Claire Gardner JBA Consulting The Library St Philips Courtyard COLESHILL Warwickshire B46 3AD RH16 4NG Revision history Revision Ref / Date Issued Amendments Issued to Draft v0-2 / March 2015 Claire Gardner Final Thurrock Council Environment Agency Natural England English Heritage Contract This report describes work commissioned by Thurrock Council. Rachel Drabble and Laura Thomas of JBA Consulting carried out this work. Prepared by Rachel Drabble BSc (Hons) Environmental Consultant Reviewed by Laura Thomas BA MRes MCIEEM Senior Ecologist Purpose This document has been prepared as a SEA Scoping Report for Thurrock Council. JBA Consulting accepts no responsibility or liability for any use that is made of this document other than by the Client for the purposes for which it was originally commissioned and prepared. JBA Consulting has no liability regarding the use of this report except to Thurrock Council. 2014s1942 Thurrock LFRMS SEA Scoping Report v1.0.docx i Copyright © Jeremy Benn Associates Limited 2015 Carbon footprint A printed copy of the main text in this document will result in a carbon footprint of 223g if 100% post-consumer recycled paper is used and 283g if primary-source paper is used. These figures assume the report is printed in black and white on A4 paper and in duplex. JBA is aiming to reduce its per capita carbon emissions. 2014s1942 Thurrock LFRMS SEA Scoping Report v1.0.docx ii Contents 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 The Local Flood Risk Management Strategy ..............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Thurrock Council As Part of the Development of Its Greengrid Strategy
    Appendix 1.2.13. INDEX 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 General Introduction 1 1.2 Background 3 2. OVERVIEW OF THURROCK 2.1 Recent Changes 5 2.2 Other Changes, Opportunities and Issues 6 2.3 BAP Resources Within Thurrock 6 2.3.1 Habitats 7 2.3.2 Species 14 2.3.3 Other BAP Issues 18 2.3.4 Summary of BAP Action Points 19 2.4 The Role of Local Wildlife Sites 20 2.5 Discussion of Local Wildlife Sites 21 2.6 Introduction to Wildlife Corridors 22 2.6.1 Corridor Requirements 23 2.6.2 Wildlife Corridors in Thurrock 26 2.6.3 Planning for the Future 28 References and Selected Bibliography Glossary of Abbreviations MAP1 Primary Corridors/Barriers Appendix 1 Development of Local Wildlife Site Selection Criteria In Essex Appendix 2 Species Indicative of Ancient Woodland In Essex Appendix 3 Species Indicative of Old, Unimproved Neutral/Acid Grassland and Marsh In Essex Appendix 4 Indicative Chalk Grassland Plants Appendix 5 Evolution of Local Nature Conservation Initiatives Appendix 6 Local Wildlife Sites Register Appendix 7 Tables and Maps of Potential Local Wildlife Sites Appendix 8 A Review Of Thurrock SSSIs Within The Local Wildlife Site Framework GREENGRID WILDLIFE STRATEGY FOR THURROCK 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 General Introduction Lying at the centre of the Thames Gateway, Thurrock is a key growth area that is set to undergo significant change. The next 15 years will see large numbers of additional houses plus development for employment. The protection and enhancement of those elements of the environment which give Thurrock its positive identity, including its ecological character, will be a critical aspect of the Greengrid and will influence the views of those who live and work in the area, as well as those passing through or considering investing.
    [Show full text]
  • Authority Monitoring Report for the Local Plan 1St April 2013 to 31 St March 2014
    Thurrock Borough Council Authority Monitoring Report For the Local Plan 1st April 2013 to 31 st March 2014 DRAFT CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION 1 LOCAL PLAN PROGRESS 2 CONTEXT 5 POLICY PERFORMANCE AND EFFECTS 11 LONDON GATEWAY LOGISTICS PARK LOCAL DEVELOPMENT ORDER (LDO) 34 APPENDIX INTRODUCTION This is Thurrock Council’s tenth annual report. This Authority Monitoring Report covers the period 1 April 2013 to 31 March 2014. Section 35 of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004 required that every local planning authority submitted an Annual Monitoring Report to the Secretary of State by the 31st December every year. The Localism Act 2011 and Town and Country Planning Regulations 2012 set out revised requirements for monitoring. Local planning authorities are still required to publish information monitoring progress on the implementation of their Local Development Scheme and planning policies included in their development plan documents at least on an annual basis, however the requirement to submit the Annual Monitoring Report to the Secretary of State by 31 December has been removed Act and the document renamed the Authority Monitoring Report (AMR). The Localism Act 2011 also created the duty to co-operate which places a legal duty on local planning authorities and other specified organisations to co-operate with each other to address strategic issues relevant to their areas. The Regulations require the AMR to give details of what action the Council has taken relating to the duty to co-operate. This Report is also written against a local background whereby, on 12 February 2014, Cabinet authorised the preparation of a new Local Plan for Thurrock to replace the Adopted Core Strategy.
    [Show full text]