Thomas Campbell - Poems
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The Poets and Poetry of Scotland
THE POETS AND POETRY OF SCOTLAND. PERIOD 1777 TO 1876. THOMAS CAMPBELL Born 1777 — Died 1844. THOMAS CAMPBELL, so justly and himself of the instructions of the celebrated poetically called the "Bard of Hope," was Heyne, and attained such proficiency in Greek bom in High Street, Glasgow, July 27, 1777, and the classics generally that he was re- and was the youngest of a family of eleven garded as one of the best classical scholars of children. His father was connected with good his day. In speaking of his college career, families in Argyleshire, and had carried on a which was extended to five sessions, it is prosperous trade as a Virginian merchant, but worthy of notice that Professor Young, in met with heavy losses at the outbreak of the awarding to Campbell a prize for the best American war. The poet was particularly translation of the Clouds of Aristophanes, pro- fortunate in the. intellectual character of his nounced it to be the best exercise which had parents, his father being the intimate friend of ever been given in by any student belonging the celebrated Dr. Thomas Reid, author of the to the university. In original poetry he Inquiry into the. Human Mind, after whom he was also distinguished above all his class- received his Christian name, while his mother mates, so that in 1793 his "Poem on Descrip- was distinguished by her love of general litera- tion" obtained the prize in the logic class. ture, combined with sound understanding and Amongst his college companions Campbell a refined taste. Campbell afforded early indi- soon became known as a poet and wit; and on cations of genius; as a child he was fond of one occasion, the students having in vain made ballad poetry, and at the age of ten composed repeated application for a holiday' in commem- verses exhibiting the delicate appreciation of oration of some public event, he sent in a peti- the graceful flow and music of language for tion in verse, with which the professor was so which his poetry was afterwards so highly dis- pleased that the holiday was granted in com- tinguished. -
Resisting Radical Energies:Walter Scott's Minstrelsy of the Scottish
Cycnos 18/06/2014 10:38 Cycnos | Volume 19 n°1 Résistances - Susan OLIVER : Resisting Radical Energies:Walter Scott’s Minstrelsy of the Scottish Borderand the Re-Fashioning of the Border Ballads Texte intégral Walter Scott conceived of and began his first major publication, the Minstrelsy of the Scottish Border, in the early 1790s. Throughout that decade and into the first three years of the nineteenth century, he worked consistently at accumulating the substantial range of ballad versions and archival material that he would use to produce what was intended to be an authoritative and definitive print version of oral and traditional Borders ballad culture. For the remainder of his life Scott continued to write and speak with affection of his “Liddesdale Raids,” the ballad collecting and research trips that he made into the Borders country around Liddesdale mainly during the years 1792–99. J. G. Lockhart, his son-in-law and biographer, describes the period spent compiling the Minstrelsy as “a labour of love truly, if ever there was,” noting that the degree of devotion was such that the project formed “the editor’s chief occupation” during the years 1800 and 1801. 1 At the same time, Lockhart takes particular care to state that the ballad project did not prevent Scott from attending the Bar in Edinburgh or from fulfilling his responsibilities as Sheriff Depute of Selkirkshire, a post he was appointed to on 16th December 1799. 2 The initial two volumes of the Minstrelsy, respectively sub-titled “Historical Ballads” and “Romantic Ballads,” were published in January 1802. 3 A third volume, supplementary to the first two, was published in May 1803. -
Indian Angles
Introduction The Asiatic Society, Kolkata. A toxic blend of coal dust and diesel exhaust streaks the façade with grime. The concrete of the new wing, once a soft yellow, now is dimmed. Mold, ever the enemy, creeps from around drainpipes. Inside, an old mahogany stair- case ascends past dusty paintings. The eighteenth-century fathers of the society line the stairs, their white linen and their pale skin yellow with age. I have come to sue for admission, bearing letters with university and government seals, hoping that official papers of one bureaucracy will be found acceptable by an- other. I am a little worried, as one must be about any bureaucratic encounter. But the person at the desk in reader services is polite, even friendly. Once he has enquired about my project, he becomes enthusiastic. “Ah, English language poetry,” he says. “Coleridge. ‘Oh Lady we receive but what we give . and in our lives alone doth nature live.’” And I, “Ours her wedding garment, ours her shroud.” And he, “In Xanadu did Kublai Khan a stately pleasure dome decree.” “Where Alf the sacred river ran,” I say. And we finish together, “down to the sunless sea.” I get my reader’s pass. But despite the clerk’s enthusiasm, the Asiatic Society was designed for a different project than mine. The catalog yields plentiful poems—in manuscript, on paper and on palm leaves, in printed editions of classical works, in Sanskrit and Persian, Bangla and Oriya—but no unread volumes of English language Indian poetry. In one sense, though, I have already found what I need: that appreciation of English poetry I have encountered everywhere, among strangers, friends, and col- leagues who studied in Indian English-medium schools. -
Florida Historical Quarterly
COVER British East Florida reached from the St. Marys River on the north to the Apalachicola River on the west and its capital stood at St. Augustine. The province of West Florida extended westward to the Mississippi River and to the thirty-first parallel on the north (and after 1764 to thirty-two degrees twenty-eight minutes). Pensacola served as its capital. Guillaume Delisle published his “Carte du Mexique et de la Floride des Terres Angloises et des Isles Antilles du Cours et des Environs de la Rivière de Mississippi,” in his Atlas Nouveau, vol. 2, no. 29 (Amsterdam, 1741[?]). The map first appeared in Paris in 1703. This portion of the map is repro- duced from a copy (1722 PKY 76) in the P. K. Yonge Library of Florida His- tory, University of Florida, Gainesville. THE FLORIDA HISTORICAL SOCIETY Volume LIV, Number 4 April 1976 THE FLORIDA HISTORICAL QUARTERLY SAMUEL PROCTOR, Editor STEPHEN KERBER, Editorial Assistant EDITORIAL ADVISORY BOARD LUIS R. ARANA Castillo de San Marcos, St. Augustine HERBERT J. DOHERTY, JR. University of Florida JOHN K. MAHON University of Florida WILLIAM W. ROGERS Florida State University JERRELL H. SHOFNER Florida Technological University CHARLTON W. TEBEAU University of Miami Correspondence concerning contributions, books for review, and all editorial matters should be addressed to the Editor, Florida Historical Quarterly, Box 14045, University Station, Gainesville, Florida 32604. The Quarterly is interested in articles and documents pertaining to the history of Florida. Sources, style, footnote form, original- ity of material and interpretation, clarity of thought, and interest of readers are considered. All copy, including footnotes, should be double-spaced. -
The Nature of British Mapping of West Africa, 1749 – 1841
The Nature of British Mapping of West Africa, 1749 – 1841 Sven Daniel Outram-Leman University of Stirling PhD History Submitted 1st May 2017 Author’s declaration The work contained in this thesis is entirely my own. The views expressed are entirely my own, and not those of the University of Stirling 1 Abstract By focusing on the “nature” of mapping, this thesis falls under the category of critical cartography closely associated with the work of Brian Harley in the 1980s and early 1990s. As such the purpose of this research is to highlight the historical context of British maps, map-making and map-reading in relation to West Africa between 1749 and 1841. I argue that maps lie near the heart of Britain’s interactions with West Africa though their appearance, construction and use evolved dramatically during this period. By beginning this study with a prominent French example (Jean Baptiste Bourguignon d’Anville’s 1749 “Afrique”) I show how British map-makers adapted cartography from France for their own purposes before circumstances encouraged the development of new materials. Because of the limited opportunities to make enquiries in the region and the relatively few people involved in affecting change to the map’s content, this thesis highlights the episodes and manufactured narratives which feature in the chronology of evolving cartographies. This study concludes with the failure of the 1841 Niger Expedition, when Britain’s humanitarian agenda saw the attempted establishment of a model farm on banks of the Niger River and the negotiation of anti-slave trade treaties with nearby Africans. -
Chester County Deed Book Index 1681-1865
Chester County Deed Book Index 1681-1865 Buyer/Seller Last First Middle Sfx/Pfx Spouse Residence Misc Property Location Village/Tract Other Party Year Book Page Instrument Comments Seller (Grantor) Cabber Charles East Brandywine Dec'd East Brandywine William Coyle 1858 K-6 116 Deed Seller (Grantor) Cadbury Joel Caroline W. Philadelphia New Garden Chandlerville Samuel Comly 1840 T-4 177 Deed Factory Seller (Grantor) Cadbury Joel Caroline W. Philadelphia Honey Brook John Cochran 1848 P-5 475 Deed Buyer (Grantee) Cadwalader Charles East Caln West Caln William Neally 1786 A-2 301 Deed Buyer (Grantee) Cadwalader Isaac Uwchlan Uwchlan Mary Norris 1791 F-2 325 Covenant Seller (Grantor) Cadwalader Isaac Sr. Sarah Uwchlan Uwchlan Isaac Cadwalader 1814 L-3 129 Deed Seller (Grantor) Cadwalader Isaac Sr. Sarah Uwchlan Uwchlan Isaac Thomas 1814 I-3 471 Deed Buyer (Grantee) Cadwalader Isaac Sr. Uwchlan Uwchlan Isaac Thomas 1814 M-3 438 Deed Buyer (Grantee) Cadwalader Isaac Jr. Uwchlan Uwchlan Isaac Cadwalader 1814 L-3 129 Deed Buyer (Grantee) Cadwalader Isaac Warwick Warwick Jesse Houck 1853 U-5 83 Deed Seller (Grantor) Cadwalader Isaac P. Susanna Warwick Warwick Abram Sivert 1860 P-6 232 Deed Seller (Grantor) Cadwalader John Sarah Uwchlan Uwchlan Joseph Phipps 1719 T-2 121 Deed Buyer (Grantee) Cadwalader John Newlin Newlin Isaac H. Bailey 1846 D-5 299 Deed Chester County Archives and Record Services, West Chester, PA 19380 Chester County Deed Book Index 1681-1865 Buyer/Seller Last First Middle Sfx/Pfx Spouse Residence Misc Property Location Village/Tract Other Party Year Book Page Instrument Comments Seller (Grantor) Cadwalader John Jane Newlin East Marlborough Marlborough John Huey Jr. -
The Hazlitt Review
THE HAZLITT REVIEW The Hazlitt Review is an annual peer-reviewed journal, the first internationally to be devoted to Hazlitt studies. The Review aims to promote and maintain Hazlitt’s standing, both in the academy and to a wider readership, by providing a forum for new writing on Hazlitt, by established scholars as well as more recent entrants in the field. Editor Uttara Natarajan Assistant Editors James Whitehead, Phillip Hunnekuhl Editorial Board Geoffrey Bindman James Mulvihill David Bromwich Tom Paulin Jon Cook Seamus Perry Gregory Dart Michael Simpson A.C. Grayling Fiona Stafford Paul Hamilton Graeme Stones Ian Mayes John Whale Tim Milnes Duncan Wu We invite essays of 4,000 to 9,000 words in length on any aspect of William Hazlitt’s work and life; articles relating Hazlitt to wider Romantic circles, topics, or discourses are also expressly welcome, as are reviews of books pertaining to such matters. Contributions should follow the MHRA style and should be sent by email to James Whitehead ([email protected]) or Philipp Hunnekuhl ([email protected]). Submissions will be considered year- round, but must be received by 1 March to be considered for publication in the same year’s Review. We regret that we cannot publish material already published or submitted elsewhere. Contributors who require their articles to be open access (under the RCUK policy effective from the 1 April 2013) should indicate this, and they will be made freely available on this website on publication. Subscriptions, including annual membership of the Hazlitt Society, are £10 (individual) or £15 (corporate or institution) per annum. -
The Disciplinary Anthology and the Field of Literary History
1 Poetess Archive Journal 1.1 (12 April 2007) Putting Contents on the Table: The Disciplinary Anthology and the Field of Literary History © Laura Mandell, 2007 Contents re-cognizing a list . From the content, the table . Marjorie Welish, “Cities of the Table” This essay disputes John Guillory’s contention that the canon was formed in the medium of the school syllabus. I take to be exemplary of the canon the list of authors arranged by period found in the Norton Anthology, 4th ed. (Abrams). Not much changed in the Norton’s table of contents between the first edition, published in 1962, and the fourth, published in 1979.1 By the sixth edition of 1993, the editors began to add women writers to the predominantly male list, but, in doing so, they also added more men: in other words, at that moment, the Norton table of contents changed principles from giving us a canon of great authors and works organized by period to giving us historical information. Of the seventh edition under the new general editorship of Greenblatt, Leah Price wrote, “This latest Norton enables readers to engage in what Stephen Greenblatt has elsewhere called ‘speaking with the dead’ – not only the proverbial dead white males but a good many others.” One doesn’t add women to a canonical table of contents and get another, different canon: one gets a view of cultural rather than artistic poetics, that is to say, all kinds of writing, great and otherwise. In addition to disputing the medium of canon formation, I will also argue against many scholars’ dating of its emergence. -
Introduction 1 Knowledge and Power
Notes Introduction 1. Robert Maniquis, Lonely Empires: Personal and Public Visions of Thomas De Quincey (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1976); Josephine McDonagh, De Quincey’s Disciplines (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994), pp. 42–65. 1 Knowledge and Power 1. Sigmund K. Proctor, Thomas De Quincey’s Theory of Literature (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1943), pp. 107–22; John E. Jordan, Thomas De Quincey, Literary Critic: His Method and Achievement (Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1952), pp. 38–42. 2. William Hazlitt, “The Indian Jugglers” (Table-Talk, 1821; originally in The Examiner, Feb. 7, 1819), equates the distinction between “power” and “knowledge” with that which exists between “intellectual” and “mechan- ical excellence”; The Complete Works of William Hazlitt, 21 vols., ed. P. P. Howe (London: J. W. Dent & Sons, 1930–4), VIII: 77–89, esp. 83–6. 3. De Quincey did not write a “theory of theory itself.” He did, however, raise the question “What is Theory” (manuscript, Royal Institution of Cornwall MS ENYS 396). This fragment, written 1823 or early 1824, was a response to Kant’s essay, “Über den Gemeinspruch: das mag in der Theorie richtig sein, taugt aber nicht für die Praxis” (1793; On the Common Expression: that may be true in Theory, but it is useless in Practice); it anticipates De Quincey’s examination of Ricardo’s “theory of value” in the “Dialogues of Three Templars on Political Economy” (London Magazine IX, March, April, May, 1824). As in the opening to “Suspiria de Profundis,” De Quincey attempts to redress the overwhelm- ing social preoccupation with material and practical concerns by defend- ing the necessity of subjective deliberations. -
Literature and Print Culture, 1780–1840, 18 (Spring 2008)
ROMANTICT eXTUALITIES literature and print culture, 1780–1840 (previously ‘Cardiff Corvey: Reading the Romantic Text’) • Issue 18 (Summer 2008) centre for editorial and intertextual research cardiff university Romantic Textualities is available on the web @ www.cf.ac.uk/encap/romtext ISSN 1748-0116 Romantic Textualities: Literature and Print Culture, 1780–1840, 18 (Spring 2008). Online: Internet (date accessed): <www.cf.ac.uk/encap/romtext/issues/rt18.pdf>. © 2008 Centre for Editorial and Intertextual Research Published by the Centre for Editorial and Intertextual Research, Cardiff University. Typeset in Adobe Garamond Pro 11 / 12.5, using Adobe InDesign cs3; images and illustrations prepared using Adobe Illustrator cs3 and Adobe PhotoShop cs3; final output rendered with Adobe Acrobat 8 Professional. Editor: Anthony Mandal, Cardiff University, UK Associate Editor: Issue 19–: Tim Killick, Cardiff University, UK Reviews Editor: Issue 18: Tim Killick, Cardiff University, UK Issue 19–: Nicola Lloyd, Cardiff University, UK Advisory Editors Peter Garside (Chair), University of Edinburgh, UK Jane Aaron, University of Glamorgan, UK Stephen Behrendt, University of Nebraska, USA Emma Clery, University of Southampton, UK Benjamin Colbert, University of Wolverhampton, UK Edward Copeland, Pomona College, USA Gillian Dow, University of Southampton / Chawton House Library, UK Caroline Franklin, University of Swansea, UK Isobel Grundy, University of Alberta, Canada David Hewitt, University of Aberdeen, UK Gillian Hughes Claire Lamont, University of Newcastle, UK Robert Miles, University of Victoria, Canada Rainer Schöwerling, University of Paderborn, Germany Christopher Skelton-Foord, University of Durham, UK Kathryn Sutherland, University of Oxford, UK Aims and Scope: Formerly Cardiff Corvey: Reading the Romantic Text (1997–2005), Romantic Textualities: Literature and Print Culture, 1780–1840 is an online journal that is committed to fore- grounding innovative Romantic-studies research into bibliography, book history, intertextuality, and textual studies. -
Anglophone in Colonial India, 1780-1913: a Critical Anthology
Introduction d D n 1799, a British o2cer took it upon himself to catalog and celebrate “the most distinguished men of the Asiatic society” of Calcutta. the society, then Ijust 0fteen years old, had already changed the landscape of European litera- ture, giving impetus to a new kind of orientalism in British poetry. British verse, imbued with orientalist tropes and themes, in its turn was shaping English lan- guage poetry written in India. At the beginning of this complex formation of literary culture, that same English o2cer—one John horsford, former fellow of st. Johns, Oxford—commemorated sir William Jones, the founder of the Asiatic society. Jones, horsford wrote, had been commissioned by Britannia herself to explore the “mystic mines of Asiatic Lore.”1 Horsford’s panegyric captured an important moment in the creation of English language letters, for Jones’s excursions into “Asiatic Lore” brought Europeans and north Americans access to Persian and sanskrit verse. Jones’s translations inlu- enced the English romantic poets and inspired Goethe and schiller, Emerson and thoreau. In the decades following Jones’s death in 1794, poets born in India, in turn, made poems shaped by Persian, sanskrit, and vernacular poetry as well as by the poetic practices of British romanticism. Over the course of the nineteenth century, the range of English language poetic production in India widened, draw- ing poets from varied backgrounds and moving into realms domestic, religious, and political. Anglophone Poetry in Colonial India, 1780–1913 traces these arcs of cultural exchange from the beginnings of English language literature in India through the long nineteenth century. -
Broadly Speaking : Scots Language and British Imperialism
BROADLY SPEAKING: SCOTS LANGUAGE AND BRITISH IMPERIALISM Sean Murphy A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of PhD at the University of St Andrews 2017 Full metadata for this item is available in St Andrews Research Repository at: http://research-repository.st-andrews.ac.uk/ Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10023/11047 This item is protected by original copyright Sean Murphy, ‘Broadly Speaking. Scots language and British imperialism.’ Abstract This thesis offers a three-pronged perspective on the historical interconnections between Lowland Scots language(s) and British imperialism. Through analyses of the manifestation of Scots linguistic varieties outwith Scotland during the nineteenth century, alongside Scottish concerns for maintaining the socio-linguistic “propriety” and literary “standards” of “English,” this discussion argues that certain elements within Lowland language were employed in projecting a sentimental-yet celebratory conception of Scottish imperial prestige. Part I directly engages with nineteenth-century “diasporic” articulations of Lowland Scots forms, focusing on a triumphal, ceremonial vocalisation of Scottish shibboleths, termed “verbal tartanry.” Much like physical emblems of nineteenth-century Scottish iconography, it is suggested that a verbal tartanry served to accentuate Scots distinction within a broader British framework, tied to a wider imperial superiorism. Parts II and III look to the origins of this verbal tartanry. Part II turns back to mid eighteenth-century Scottish linguistic concerns, suggesting the emergence of a proto-typical verbal tartanry through earlier anxieties to ascertain “correct” English “standards,” and the parallel drive to perceive, prohibit, and prescribe Scottish linguistic usage. It is argued that later eighteenth-century Scottish philological priorities for the roots and “purity” of Lowland Scots forms – linked to “ancient” literature and “racially”-loaded origin myths – led to an encouraged “uncovering” of hallowed linguistic traits.