DOCSLIB.ORG

DP3330 River Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
DP3330 River Report RIVER REPORT March 2007 Mangrove manifesto THE jury is back on the issue of invasive saltwater mangrove proliferation along the Brisbane River. The verdict … overwhelmingly in favour of allowing judicious pruning, replacing what many call draconian prohibition with commonsense management. We were swamped (if you'll excuse the intentional pun) with responses to our survey, enclosed with the October 2006 DIXON JOHNSTON Quality Property River Report, seeking your views on river mangrove management. Within weeks, 199 completed questionnaires flooded in - an astonishing response considering there are only around 850 individual residential properties along the river. Of these 199 respondents, a whopping 195 agreed selective trimming of saltwater mangroves should be permitted under certain conditions. Importantly, the vast majority took great care to stipulate support for pruning - not removal - on the proviso no environmental harm would result. The concern and frustration expressed on this issue was immense, our readers' outcry so decisive, we lead this edition of the River Report with an analysis and report on the mangrove survey results. Indeed, many respondents conveyed heartfelt gratitude that someone was making a constructive effort to put mangrove management on the public agenda. Thanks to your participation, we now have a 'mangrove manifesto' that surely cannot be ignored by politicians and public servants. As you will read overleaf, we have compiled the survey results and provided them to government leaders, senior bureaucrats, river precinct MPs and councillors, seeking their official response. The plea for action is firmly on the table. So, thank you for your input. Of course, this edition includes our regular commentary of the residential river market. Last year saw a slight rise in residential sales activity on the river and, more importantly, continued growth in values. Also, in response to readers' requests for articles on Brisbane's rich riverside history, we explore Chelmer's 'links' to the past. But first, more on mangroves … Josephine Johnston-Rowell RIVERFRONT DIRECTOR [email protected] DIXON JOHNSTON Quality Property Pty Ltd Contents 70 Sylvan Road, Toowong, Call to permit pruning ‘salties . Page 2 Brisbane ...mangrove survey swamped Please direct mail to: River rewards continue to flow . Page 4 P.O. Box 789, Toowong, ...intrinsic value in riverfront land Qld. 4066 Mangrove survey results. Page 6 ...response sought from leaders Phone: (07) 3858 8888 Chelmer’s historic links. Page 7 Full details at www.dixonjohnston.com.au Riverfront sales. Page 8 Call to permit pruning ‘salties’ ...mangrove survey swamped GIVE the river back to the - 91% (181) were “strongly in favour” location, with 32 of these living there people of Brisbane! In a of a controlled study being between 30 and 64 years - not to desperate plea to be heard, undertaken to ascertain the impact of mention the Oxley Sailing Club which 98 per cent of respondents to selective trimming and / or removal of has notched up 105 years of river mangroves. a survey on mangrove experience. management have come - 32 respondents wanted residents to Those whose tenure on the river was down firmly in favour of lifting be given an unrestricted right to less than 10 years accounted for 46% the blanket prohibition on prune mangroves. of respondents. Around 25% of all pruning the prolific saltwater - Ecological / habitat support and bank respondents had lived on the river for mangroves that now wall off stabilisation / erosion mitigation were five or fewer years which, on detailed much of our waterway. recognised as the most important analysis, may account for several of positive values of mangroves. those who reported observing little or The survey, distributed late last year to no mangrove growth. all river owners, drew a massive 199 - Negative impacts of mangroves responses. A full breakdown of the highlighted by respondents were: Still, of the 91 respondents with less results is published on P.6 of this restriction of river views (90%), than 10 years on the river, 54% said report. Key findings include: restriction of river access (68%), they had seen “significant” growth. reduced enjoyment of your property - 65% (129) of respondents observed Understandably, “significant” growth (68%), and compromised security “significant” growth in the height and spread was reported by 76% of (48%). and/or spread of mangroves the long-term (20 years+) residents. In adjacent to their property, while 18% LIFETIMES BY THE RIVER all cases, of course, the response to described growth as “moderate”, To put these findings into context, it is this question depended on the river 11% as “slight” and 6% reported important to understand the reach / location of residence. observing no growth. “experience” of those who participated WHY, OH WHY! - 98% (195) of respondents wanted in the survey. By and large, these are The views expressed by the vast selective trimming of riverside people whose views are based on mangroves to be permitted under long-term first hand experience. majority of survey respondents can certain circumstances. only be described as passionate and Significantly, 54% (108 of the 199 definite. The overarching themes can - 79% (158) were in favour of allowing returned questionnaires) indicated they be summarised as: pruning to be done by either the had lived on the river for 10 years or affected land owner or a qualified longer. Further, 30% of the total had - we advocate pruning only - not contractor, within guidelnes. spent 20 years or more in their i river removal. e based on long-term first hand experience iews ar V Chelmer Reach - photo taken 1986 continued next page . Page 2 Dixon Johnston Quality Property River Report - March 2007 by Josephine Johnston-Rowell Riverfront Director - we appreciate the importance of units ($225,000) for an offence under up of mud and sediment, affect on mangroves to the river eco-system section 123 of the Act which states water flow, levels and potentially and bank stability. that: heightened flood risk, rubbish build- up, reduced breezes, white ants, - we absolutely want to see the A person must not unlawfully - snakes, feral animals, fire risk and 'science' on mangrove management, (a) remove, destroy or damage a danger to children. because all commonsense and marine plant; or anecdotal evidence suggests Environmental and lifestyle concerns trimming would promote, inot harm (b) cause a marine plant to be were clearly dominant. In fact, only mangrove health. removed, destroyed or damaged.” three respondents mentioned concern about property values being - historic evidence shows the saltwater ANXIETY AND FRUSTRATION threatened. Five made the valid point mangrove is not natural to river It is clear from our readers’ responses, that they are paying rates based on reaches beyond the inner eastern many accompanied by extensive “riverfront” values, yet they can't even suburbs, rather, a consequence of comments, letters and notes of see the river. human intervention; and support, this issue is causing widespread stress and anxiety. The Given the lack of action, or even - as one resident of 10 years summed sense of frustration is perhaps evident interest in this issue by the relevant it up - mangroves constitute an in the fact that, when asked to identify authorities, who could blame residents invasive species which did not the positive impacts of mangroves, 57 for feeling their worries are being e clearly dominant previously exist in the area, so it is ticked the box marked 'none'. ignored for the wrong reasons. ridiculous to regard them as a Consider this poignant note by one 'protected species'. Most, however, frankly acknowledged respondent: mangroves, in addition to providing One reader who returned our environmental benefits, enhanced their “We are adjacent to a park. Soon the questionnaire included copies of lifestyle and amenity. They just can't public will not be able to see the river ns wer correspondence from the Queensland understand why trimming would either. Permits to trim now (eg for Department of Primary Industries and compromise the ecological or bank pontoons) are prohibitively expensive. Fisheries' legal department. He was stabilisation attributes. Fair question! It is always assumed that those who alleged to have “damaged” (ie. live on the river have large cash flows. The negative impacts listed in addition trimmed) some saltwater mangroves Not so! We have just lived here for a to those previously noted, were many. on his property. The letter duly long time. Resident 40 years The strongest to emerge was informed him: excessive mosquitos and midgies, in “The Fisheries Act 1994 provides for some cases causing abject misery. Survey results - and more on this issue severe penalties of up to 3000 penalty Other problems highlighted were build …. page six onmental and lifestyle concer Envir Chelmer Reach - Same view photo taken 2006 Dixon Johnston Quality Property River Report - March 2007 Page 3 River rewards continue to flow ... intrinsic value in riverfront land BRISBANE'S love affair with river living continued to drive the prestige residential market in 2006. Sales of houses and vacant land on the river were up on the 2005 tally but, more significantly, we achieved yet another all-time record average price for absolute riverfront homes and vacant homesites. eal mover In our interim River Report (Oct '06), we predicted a soft landing for the river market, despite a more pronounced 'correction' across the wider residential real estate market after the 2003 boom. That has indeed proved to be the case, with the 2006 turnover of riverfront houses and land lifting to 51 Highest Absolute Riverfront House Sale - New Farm from 49 in 2005, and the average house price climbing another 3.5 per $155,125,500. This is actually down been in decline since 2003, it picked cent to reach $2,761,290. on 2005 ($188.67 million), but should up last year, though only slightly. not be seen as a reflection of the Notably, the market has recognised As we've so often stated, riverfront residential market.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Queensland Election 2006
    Parliament of Australia Department of Parliamentary Services Parliamentary Library RESEARCH BRIEF Information analysis and advice for the Parliament 16 November 2006, no. 3, 2006–07, ISSN 1832-2883 Queensland Election 2006 The Queensland election of September 2006 saw the Beattie Labor Government win a fourth term of office, continuing the longest period of ALP government in the state since 1957. The Coalition parties’ share of the vote puts them within reach of victory, but the way in which they work towards the next election—particularly in the area of policy development—will be crucial to them if they are to succeed. Scott Bennett, Politics and Public Administration Section Stephen Barber, Statistics and Mapping Section Contents Executive summary ................................................... 1 Introduction ........................................................ 2 An election is called .................................................. 2 The Government’s travails............................................ 2 The Coalition ..................................................... 4 Might the Government be defeated? ..................................... 6 Over before it started? ................................................. 6 Party prospects ...................................................... 7 The Coalition parties ................................................ 7 The Government ................................................... 8 Campaigning........................................................ 8 The Government................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Transcript 9 October 2012 Estimates
    09 Oct 2012 Estimates—Premier and Cabinet 1 TUESDAY, 9 OCTOBER 2012 Legislative Assembly ESTIMATES—FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE—PREMIER AND CABINET Estimates Committee Members Estimates—Premier and Cabinet Mr MJ Crandon (Chair) Mr CW Pitt Mr R Gulley Mr IS Kaye Mr TS Mulherin Mrs FK Ostapovitch Mr EJ Sorensen Mr MA Stewart In Attendance Hon. CKT Newman, Premier Mr B Myers, Chief of Staff, Office of the Premier Department of the Premier and Cabinet Mr J Grayson, Director-General Mr G Robson, Director, Economic Policy Ms J Dudurovic, Executive Director, Business Services Mr I Maynard, Commission Chief Executive, Public Service Commission Committee met at 10.32 am CHAIR: I declare the estimates hearing of the Finance and Administration Committee open. On behalf of the committee, I welcome to the hearing the Premier, officers of the department and related entities, and members of the public. I am Michael Crandon, the member for Coomera and chair of the committee. Joining me on the committee are Mr Curtis Pitt, who is yet to arrive; Mr Reg Gulley MP, member for Murrumba; Mr Ian Kaye MP, member for Greenslopes; Mr Tim Mulherin MP, member for Mackay; Mrs Freya Ostapovitch MP, member for Stretton; Mr Ted Sorensen MP, member for Hervey Bay; Mr Mark Stewart MP, member for Sunnybank; and Annastacia Palaszczuk MP, member for Inala. The committee will now examine the Appropriation Bill 2012 and the estimates for the areas of responsibility administered by the Premier. The committee will consider the estimates for the Department of the Premier and Cabinet and related entities until 12 noon.
    [Show full text]
  • 2009 QUEENSLAND ELECTION Analysis of Results
    2009 QUEENSLAND ELECTION Analysis of Results CONTENTS Introduction ....................................................................................................1 Summary of Redistribution ...........................................................................3 Legislative Assembly Election Summary of Legislative Assembly Results............................................7 Legislative Assembly Results by Electoral District .............................. 12 Summary of Two-Party Preferred Results ........................................... 27 Regional Summaries ........................................................................... 33 By-elections 2007 - 2011..................................................................... 36 Selected Preference Distributions .............................................................. 37 Changes in Parliamentary Membership ..................................................... 39 Queensland Election Results 1947-2007 ................................................... 40 Symbols .. Nil or rounded to zero * Sitting MP in the previous parliament. Notes indicate where an MP is contesting a different electorate. .... 'Ghost' candidate, where a party contesting the previous election did not nominate for the current election. Party Abbreviations ALP Australian Labor Party DEM Australian Democrats DLP Democratic Labor Party DSQ Daylight Saving for South East Queensland FFP Family First IND Independents GRN The Greens LIB Liberal Party LNP Liberal National Party NAT The Nationals ONP One Nation
    [Show full text]
  • Candidate Details (In Ballot Paper Order) 2006 State General Election
    2006 State General Election held on 09/09/2006 Candidate Details (in Ballot Paper order) Electoral District Albert Candidate: PETTINATO, Marella THE GREENS Contact Person: Marella Pettinato Ph (B): (07) 5630 1191 PO Box 109 Ph (AH): (07) 5630 1191 BROADBEACH QLD 4218 Candidate: KEECH, Margaret AUSTRALIAN LABOR PARTY Contact Person: Margaret Majella Keech Ph (B): (07) 3807 0809 PO Box 577 Fax: (07) 3807 6296 BEENLEIGH QLD 4207 Email: [email protected] Candidate: WOODROW, Karen LIBERAL PARTY Mob: 0409 041 393 Candidate: EATON, Jonathan FAMILY FIRST PARTY Contact Person: Jonathan Mark Eaton Mob: 0423 017 744 PO Box 5222 Email: [email protected] EAGLEBY QLD 4207 Electoral District Algester Candidate: CROCKER, Gary THE GREENS Mob: 0408 003 853 Email: [email protected] Candidate: TAN, William LIBERAL PARTY Contact Person: William Wee Liat Tan Mob: 0414 367 711 4 Dakar Road Fax: (07) 3711 6150 ALGESTER QLD 4115 Email: [email protected] Candidate: STRUTHERS, Karen AUSTRALIAN LABOR PARTY Ph (B): (07) 3216 6389 Fax: (07) 3216 6143 Email: [email protected] Electoral District Ashgrove Candidate: KIDDLE, Glenn LIBERAL PARTY Contact Person: Glenn Phillip Kiddle Mob: 0420 218 060 46 Grange Road Email: [email protected] GRANGE QLD 4051 Candidate: LOVE, Dean THE GREENS Contact Person: Dean Love Mob: 0405 843 826 10 Teale Street Email: [email protected] ASHGROVE QLD 4060 Candidate: JONES, Kate AUSTRALIAN LABOR PARTY Contact Person: Kate Jones Ph (B): (07) 3352 7996 PO Box 2 Ph (AH): (07)
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 Queensland State Election: an Overview
    RESEARCH PAPER SERIES, 2015–16 17 SEPTEMBER 2015 2015 Queensland state election: an overview Dr Joy McCann and Simon Speldewinde Politics and Public Administration Section Executive summary • This paper provides an overview of the issues and outcomes for the January 2015 election for the Queensland Legislative Assembly. Where appropriate, it draws on the Library’s earlier publication on the 2012 Queensland state election.1 • The 2015 Queensland state election result surprised many observers with the dramatic shift in the fortunes of the two major parties. The Australian Labor Party (ALP), having lost government at the 2012 election and retaining just seven seats, emerged with 44 of the 89 seats with a swing of 10.8 per cent. The Liberal National Party (LNP), which had won a record majority of 78 of the 89 seats at the 2012 state election, experienced a swing of 8.3 per cent against it with its seats reduced to 42. Of the remaining seats, two were won by Katter’s Australian Party and one by Independent Peter Wellington. • The election outcome was initially unclear when it was revealed that a Palmer United Party candidate was ineligible as a result of being an undischarged bankrupt. Electoral Commission Queensland (ECQ) indicated that it would refer the Ferny Grove election result to the Court of Disputed Returns but subsequently decided not to proceed based on legal advice, paving the way for the ALP to form minority government with the support of an Independent. • Several key issues emerged during the election campaign including political financing, privatisation and asset sales, the impact of mining on the Great Barrier Reef and anti-association laws.
    [Show full text]
  • Queensland Election 2009
    Parliament of Australia Department of Parliamentary Services Parliamentary Library Information, analysis and advice for the Parliament RESEARCH PAPER www.aph.gov.au/library 2 June 2009, no. 34, 2008–09, ISSN 1834-9854 Queensland election 2009 Dr Mark Rodrigues Politics and Public Administration Section Executive summary • The 2009 Queensland state election, held six months early on Saturday 21 March 2009, was announced on YouTube by Labor Premier Anna Bligh. • In order to defeat the 11 year old Government, the newly merged Liberal National Party (LNP) lead by Lawrence Springborg, required a substantial swing of 8.3 per cent to gain an additional 20 seats. • This was the first election in Australia since the onset of the global economic downturn. Jobs and management of the economy were dominant themes in the election campaign. New electoral boundaries and three tropical cyclones also framed the context for the election. • Under the banner of ‘Keep Queensland strong’, Labor primarily campaigned on creating 100 000 new jobs, maintaining its record spending on infrastructure and developing a football stadium on the Gold Coast. • The LNP campaigned on ‘Change for a better Queensland’ and proposed to apply a three per cent funding cut to public sector spending, maintain two children’s hospitals in Brisbane, and implement a $726.9 million infrastructure investment program. • Pre-election polling indicated a tight finish with the LNP ahead 51–49 on a two-party preferred basis. However, despite a 4.7 per cent (first preference) swing against Labor, the Government was returned with 51 of the 89 seats. Bligh became the first female to be elected Premier in Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • Hansard 5 April 2001
    5 Apr 2001 Legislative Assembly 351 THURSDAY, 5 APRIL 2001 Mr SPEAKER (Hon. R. K. Hollis, Redcliffe) read prayers and took the chair at 9.30 a.m. PETITIONS The Clerk announced the receipt of the following petitions— Western Ipswich Bypass Mr Livingstone from 197 petitioners, requesting the House to reject all three options of the proposed Western Ipswich Bypass. State Government Land, Bracken Ridge Mr Nuttall from 403 petitioners, requesting the House to consider the request that the land owned by the State Government at 210 Telegraph Road, Bracken Ridge be kept and managed as a bushland reserve. Spinal Injuries Unit, Townsville General Hospital Mr Rodgers from 1,336 petitioners, requesting the House to provide a 24-26 bed Acute Care Spinal Injuries Unit at the new Townsville General Hospital in Douglas currently under construction. Left-Hand Drive Vehicles Mrs D. Scott from 233 petitioners, requesting the House to lower the age limit required to register a left-hand drive vehicle. Mater Children's Hospital Miss Simpson from 50 petitioners, requesting the House to (a) urge that Queensland Health reward efficient performance, rather than limit it, for the high growth population in the southern corridor, (b) argue that Queenslanders have the right to decide where their child is treated without being turned away, (c) decide that the Mater Children’s Hospital not be sent into deficit for meeting the needs of children who present at the door and (d) review the current funding system immediately to remedy this. PAPERS MINISTERIAL PAPER The following ministerial paper was tabled— Hon. R.
    [Show full text]
  • Extract from Daily Hansard Thursday, 21 May 2009
    Speech by Glen Elmes MEMBER FOR NOOSA Hansard Thursday, 21 May 2009 ADDRESS-IN-REPLY Mr ELMES (Noosa—LNP) (8.27 pm): I am very happy to be able to stand here before the House tonight and deliver this speech to the address-in-reply. The fact that I am standing here means that the Noosa community, which I represent, has seen fit to honour me for a second term as their representative in the Queensland parliament. It is a huge honour and privilege made more so this time by the fact that once the dust had settled and the last votes were counted I was able to attain just under 70 per cent of the two- party preferred vote. The challenge for me now in this second term is to continue to address the needs of my community and reflect their views in what I say both here and elsewhere, and try to achieve a similar result in the next election campaign. It would be very remiss of me not to thank my campaign team headed by Nick Dondas and Matt Collins, and ably assisted by Barry Elms, Earle Bailey, David Peel, Jeff Nuske, Dean Williams and Karla Hobson. These wonderful people formed the core of the campaign team. In the lead-up to election day at prepolling, at declared institutions and on election day at the polling booths, something like 160 volunteers came out to support not just me but also the ideals and the policies of the Liberal National Party. I would like to make special mention of Lyn Parker and Barb Hannon in my office; my wonderful wife, Lesleigh, and my children, Teigan and Kristin, for their help, support and encouragement along the way.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Committees in Rights Protection in Federal and State Parliaments in Australia I Introduction
    40 UNSW Law Journal Volume 41(1) 3 THE ROLE OF COMMITTEES IN RIGHTS PROTECTION IN FEDERAL AND STATE PARLIAMENTS IN AUSTRALIA LAURA GRENFELL* AND SARAH MOULDS** This article offers a snapshot of how Australian parliamentary committees scrutinise Bills for their rights-compliance in circumstances where the political stakes are high and the rights impacts strong. It tests the assumption that parliamentary models of rights protection are inherently flawed when it comes to Bills directed at electorally unpopular groups such as bikies and terrorists by analysing how parliamentary committees have scrutinised rights-limiting anti-bikie Bills and counter-terrorism Bills. Through these case studies a more nuanced picture emerges, with evidence that, in the right circumstances, parliamentary scrutiny of ‘law and order’ can have a discernible rights-enhancing impact. The article argues that when parliamentary committees engage external stakeholders they can contribute to the development of an emerging culture of rights-scrutiny. While this emerging culture may not yet work to prevent serious intrusions into individual rights, at the federal level there are signs it may at least be capable of moderating these intrusions. I INTRODUCTION Australia has a parliamentary model of rights protection which means that, outside of the protections provided by the Constitution and the common law, most Parliaments in Australia have almost exclusive responsibility for directly protecting the rights of all members of the community. Only in two Australian Parliaments, those of Victoria and the Australian Capital Territory, is this direct * Dr Laura Grenfell is an Associate Professor at the University of Adelaide Law School where she teaches and researches public law and human rights.
    [Show full text]
  • Record of Proceedings
    PROOF ISSN 1322-0330 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Hansard Home Page: http://www.parliament.qld.gov.au/hansard/ E-mail: [email protected] Phone: (07) 3406 7314 Fax: (07) 3210 0182 Subject FIRST SESSION OF THE FIFTY-THIRD PARLIAMENT Page Wednesday, 5 August 2009 PRIVILEGE ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 1401 Alleged Deliberate Misleading of the House by a Member ................................................................................................ 1401 SPEAKER’S STATEMENT ............................................................................................................................................................ 1401 Unparliamentary Language in the House ........................................................................................................................... 1401 PRIVILEGE ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 1402 Speaker’s Ruling, Answers to Questions on Notice ........................................................................................................... 1402 PETITIONS ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 1402 TABLED PAPERS .........................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Andrew Fraser on the 5 Day of August 2013 at Brisbane 111 the State of Queensland in the Presence Of
    IN THE MATTER OF THE C0Jl1Jl1ISSIONS OF INQUIRY ACT 1950 QUEENSLAND RACING COMMISSION OF INQUIRY AFFIDAVIT I, ANDRE'W FRASER, of c/- Gilshenan & Luton Legal Practice, Level 11, 15 Adelaide Street, Brisbane in the State of Queensland, atlirm and say as follows: I. I am the recipient of a Requirement to Give Information in a Written Statement issued pursuant to section 5(1 )(d) of the Commissions oflnquiiJ' Jlct 1950 and dated 5 July 2013 (the Requirement) with respect to matters associated with paragraphs 3(b), 3(c), 3(d), 3(f), and 3(g) ofthe Terms of Reference contained in Commissions of JnquiiJ' Order (lVo 1) of 2013 (the Terms of Reference). Attached to this affidavit and marked AF-1 is a true copy of that Requirement. 2. From 13 September 2006 to 13 September 2007, 1 was the Minister for Local Government, Planning and Sport in the Beattie Government. Then, from 13 September 2007 unti I the State Election on 24 March 2012, 1 served as Treasurer in the Bligh Government. From 26 March 2009 I also served as the Minister for Employment and Economic Development and, following a machine1y of govenunent change on 21 f-ebruary 20 II , T \Vas appointed as Treasurer and rvlinister for State Development and Trade. From 16 September 20 II to 24 March 2012, 1 held the office ofDeputy Premier. PAGE I Deponent ~~ c - AFFIDAVIT OF Gilshenan & Luton Legal Practice ANDRE'W FRASER Level II , 15 Adelaide Street Brisbane QLD 4000 Telephone: (07) 3361 0222 Fax: (07) 3360 0201 3. Over the Relevant Period, as that expression is defined in the Schedule to the Requirement (I January 2007 to 30 April 20 12), I was the Minister responsible for racing between 13 September 2006 and 26 :rvlarch 2009.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Chronicles
    Australian Journal of Politics and History: Volume 54, Number 2, 2008, pp. 289-341. Political Chronicles Commonwealth of Australia July to December 2007 JOHN WANNA The Australian National University and Griffith University The Stage, the Players and their Exits and Entrances […] All the world’s a stage, And all the men and women merely players; They have their exits and their entrances; [William Shakespeare, As You Like It] In the months leading up to the 2007 general election, Prime Minister John Howard waited like Mr Micawber “in case anything turned up” that would restore the fortunes of the Coalition. The government’s attacks on the Opposition, and its new leader Kevin Rudd, had fallen flat, and a series of staged events designed to boost the government’s stocks had not translated into electoral support. So, as time went on and things did not improve, the Coalition government showed increasing signs of panic, desperation and abandonment. In July, John Howard had asked his party room “is it me” as he reflected on the low standing of the government (Australian, 17 July 2007). Labor held a commanding lead in opinion polls throughout most of 2007 — recording a primary support of between 47 and 51 per cent to the Coalition’s 39 to 42 per cent. The most remarkable feature of the polls was their consistency — regularly showing Labor holding a 15 percentage point lead on a two-party-preferred basis. Labor also seemed impervious to attack, and the government found it difficult to get traction on “its” core issues to narrow the gap.
    [Show full text]