DOCSLIB.ORG

Sanders & Buttigieg Outpace Rest of the Field; Half of Likely Voters Still

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sanders & Buttigieg Outpace Rest of the Field; Half of Likely Voters Still CNN 2020 NH Primary Poll February 10, 2020 SANDERS & BUTTIGIEG OUTPACE REST OF THE FIELD; HALF OF LIKELY VOTERS STILL NOT DEFINITELY DECIDED By: Sean P. McKinley, M.A. [email protected] Zachary S. Azem, M.A. 603-862-2226 Andrew E. Smith, Ph.D. cola.unh.edu/unh-survey-center DURHAM, NH – On the eve of the New Hampshire primary, Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders's slim lead over former South Bend (IN) Mayor Pete Bu gieg among likely Democra c voters is holding in the high single digits. Former Vice President Joe Biden and Massachuse s Senator Elizabeth Warren are vying for third. There has been li le movement over the past six days, with support for each candidate within two percentage points of where each began. Minnesota Senator Amy Klobuchar seems to have benefi ed most from the Democra c debate on February 7, but she remains in fi h place. Half of likely Democra c voters s ll have not definitely decided whom to support. These findings are based on the latest CNN 2020 New Hampshire Primary Poll*, conducted by the University of New Hampshire Survey Center. Seven hundred five (705) randomly selected New Hampshire adults were interviewed in English by landline and cellular telephone between February 6 and February 9, 2020. The margin of sampling error for the survey is +/- 3.7 percent. Included in the sample were 365 likely 2020 Democra c Primary voters (margin of sampling error +/- 5.1 percent) and 212 likely 2020 Republican Primary voters (margin of sampling error +/- 6.7 percent). Trend points prior to July 2019 reflect results from the Granite State Poll, conducted by the University of New Hampshire Survey Center. 2020 Democra c Primary Despite vo ng in the New Hampshire presiden al primary beginning in less than twenty-four hours, there remains considerable uncertainty among likely Democra c primary voters as to whom they will vote for; half (50%) say they have definitely decided, largely unchanged compared to the two previous polling periods (Feb 4-7 & Feb 5-8). Twenty-one percent say they are leaning towards someone, while 28% say they are s ll trying to decide. Among likely Democra c primary voters, registered Democrats (52%) and voters who are registered as undeclared (48%) are about equally likely to say they have definitely decided. Definitely Decided on Candidate - Democra c Primary Voters - October 2017 to February 6-9, 2020 100% 94% 91% 85% 87% 80% 77% 78% 60% 64% 57% 51% 53% 49% 50% 40% 23% 31% 28% 20% 30% 28% 20% 21% 13% 14% 21% 10% 20% 19% 19% 8% 16% 5% 9% 0% 4% 5% 8% 5% Oct 2017 Feb 2018 Apr 2018 Aug 2018 Feb 2019 Apr 2019 Jul 2019 Oct 2019 Jan 2020 Feb 4-7 Feb 5-8 Feb 6-9 2020 2020 2020 Definitely Decided Leaning Towards Someone Still Trying To Decide * We ask that this copyrighted informa on be referred to as the CNN 2020 New Hampshire Primary Poll, conducted by the University of New Hampshire Survey Center. If the 2020 New Hampshire Democra c primary were held today, 29% of likely primary voters say they would vote for Sanders, 22% would vote for Bu gieg, 11% would vote for Biden, and 10% would vote for Warren. Seven percent would vote for Klobuchar, 5% would vote for Hawaii Congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard, and 4% would vote for entrepreneur Andrew Yang. One percent say they would vote for businessman Tom Steyer, and less than 1% each would vote for former New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg or Colorado Senator Michael Bennet. One percent say they would vote for another candidate while 10% of likely Democra c primary voters say they are undecided. Preferred Democra c 2020 Presiden al Nomina on Candidate - February 6-9, 2020 Bernie Sanders 29% Pete Buttigieg 22% Joe Biden 11% Elizabeth Warren 10% Amy Klobuchar 7% Tulsi Gabbard 5% Andrew Yang 4% Tom Steyer 1% Michael Bloomberg 0% Michael Bennet 0% Other 1% Undecided 10% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50% Compared to the period from February 5-8, support for Warren (+1.2 percentage points) has increased very slightly while support for Biden (-1.1) has very slightly declined. Overall, results have remained quite stable over the three most recent survey periods, with support for each candidate remaining within two percentage points of where they began during the February 4-7 polling period. Preferred Democra c 2020 Presiden al Nomina on Candidate - October 2017 to February 6-9, 2020 40% Bernie Sanders 35% Pete Buttigieg Joe Biden 31% 31% 30% 30% Elizabeth Warren 30% 28% 28% 29% 26% Tulsi Gabbard 29% 24% 25% Amy Klobuchar 22% Andrew Yang 24% 24% 21% 21% 19% 19% Tom Steyer 20% 18% 22% 18% 21% Michael Bloomberg 16% 19% 15% 14% 15% Michael Bennet 17% Deval Patrick 13% 12% 15% 15% 12% 15% 11% 11% 10% 12% Undecided 10% 12% 11% 12% 10% 10% 7% 10% 6% 9% 6%9% 9% 8% 7% 5% 5% 4% 2% 4% 4% 1% 3% 0% 1% 1% 0% 1% 1%1% 1% 0% 0% 0 0 0 8 9 0 8 9 8 9 7 9 2 2 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 l 7 8 9 r r t t b b n g - - - u c c p p e e a u 4 5 6 J J O O A A F F A b b b e e e F F F Because Michael Bloomberg is not running in the New Hampshire primary, his name was not included in the list of candidates who were read aloud. However, responses from those who volunteered Bloomberg as their choice are included. Deval Patrick was included in the read list of candidates but did not receive support from any respondents. Seven leading Democra c candidates met for a debate in Manchester, New Hampshire, on February 7. Klobuchar (+7.1 percentage points) and Biden (+6.8) have experienced a good deal greater support in the two days a er the debate than they did in the two days leading up to the debate, while Bu gieg (+2.5) and Sanders (+1.5) have seen smaller increases in support a er the debate. Gabbard (-4.6) and Warren (-1.6) meanwhile have fared slightly worse since the debate. Preferred Democra c Candidate During February 6-9, 2020 Period Before and A er Debate Pre-Debate Post-Debate Bernie Sanders 28% 30% Pete Buttigieg 21% 23% Joe Biden 8% 14% Amy Klobuchar 4% 11% Elizabeth Warren 11% 9% Andrew Yang 4% 3% Tulsi Gabbard 7% 2% Michael Bennet 1% Tom Steyer 2% 1% Michael Bloomberg 1% Other 2% 0% Undecided 14% 6% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Among likely Democra c voters who are self-described liberals, 39% support Sanders, 21% support Bu gieg, 16% support Warren, 7% support Biden, and 5% support Klobuchar. Support for Sanders among this group has declined by six percentage points since the period from February 5-8 while support for Warren (+2.4) has slightly increased. Among self-described moderates and conserva ves, 23% support Bu gieg, 19% support Sanders, 14% support Biden, and 8% each support Klobuchar or Gabbard. While support for Sanders has slightly declined among liberals, his support among moderates and conserva ves has increased such that he now challenges Bu gieg among this group. Biden, who in January was ed with Bu gieg among this group, now sits in third behind Bu gieg as well as Sanders. Preferred Democra c Candidate by Ideology - February 6-9, 2020 Feb 6-9 2020 Bernie Sanders 39% (-6.1%) Pete Buttigieg 21% (1.0%) Elizabeth Warren 16% (2.4%) Joe Biden 7% (2.0%) Liberal Amy Klobuchar 5% (1.3%) Andrew Yang 1% (0.1%) Tulsi Gabbard 1% (-0.1%) Tom Steyer 0% (0.0%) Pete Buttigieg 23% (-0.5%) Bernie Sanders 19% (4.3%) Joe Biden 14% (-1.3%) Amy Klobuchar 8% (0.2%) Moderate or Tulsi Gabbard 8% (-0.3%) Conservative Andrew Yang 5% (0.2%) Elizabeth Warren 4% (-0.3%) Tom Steyer 2% (-1.5%) Michael Bloomberg 1% (-1.1%) Michael Bennet 1% (0.5%) 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50% 55% 60% 65% Support for Sanders con nues to be highly concentrated among younger voters, par cularly female voters under the age of thirty-five, though he has lost ground among this group since the February 5-8 period. Sanders also leads the field among men aged thirty-five to forty-nine and has increased his share of support among this group by seven percentage points since the last polling period. Bu gieg's support con nues to be more balanced; he leads the field among women aged fi y to sixty-four and closely trails Sanders among men aged fi y to sixty-four and women thirty-five to forty-nine. However, Bu gieg remains a distant second to Sanders among women under thirty-five and men under fi y. Biden now leads the field among men and women aged sixty-five and older, but elsewhere Biden enjoys very li le support. Support for Klobuchar has increased since the February 5-8 period but her supporters are even more concentrated than Biden's among voters fi y and older, par cularly women sixty-five and over. Preferred Democra c Candidate by Gender and Age - February 6-9, 2020 Women Men Bernie Sanders 50% (-14%) 37% (-2%) Pete Buttigieg 13% (2%) 23% (4%) 18 to 34 Elizabeth Warren 16% (5%) 8% (-1%) Joe Biden 9% (4%) 13% (-2%) Bernie Sanders 33% (6%) 51% (7%) Pete Buttigieg 28% (5%) 20% (-3%) 35 to 49 Elizabeth Warren 21% (4%) 8% (0%) Joe Biden 4% (0%) Amy Klobuchar 2% (-5%) Pete Buttigieg 23% (-3%) 23% (0%) Bernie Sanders 18% (6%) 27% (4%) 50 to 64 Amy Klobuchar 10% (-1%) 10% (4%) Elizabeth Warren 8% (2%) 3% (-1%) Joe Biden 6% (-2%) 5% (-5%) Joe Biden 25% (3%) 26% (1%) Pete Buttigieg 20% (-1%) 18% (-7%) 65 and older Amy Klobuchar 18% (4%) 8% (3%) Bernie Sanders 8% (-4%) 11% (3%) Elizabeth Warren 7% (0%) 10% (0%) 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Sanders con nues to lead Bu gieg among men and women without a college degree, with Biden and Warren trailing among both groups.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • TRIP Snap Poll XII January 2020 Introduction
    TRIP Snap Poll XII January 2020 Teaching, Research & International Policy (TRIP) Project Global Research Institute (GRI) https://trip.wm.edu/home Principal Investigators: Susan Peterson, William & Mary Ryan Powers, University of Georgia Michael J. Tierney, William & Mary Data Contacts: Eric Parajon or Emily Jackson Phone: (757) 221-1466 Email: i [email protected] Methodology: We attempted to contact all international relations (IR) scholars in the U.S. We define IR scholars as individuals who are employed at a college or university in a political science department or professional school and who teach or conduct research on issues that cross international borders. Of the 4,752 scholars across the U.S. that we contacted, 971 responded. The resulting response rate is approximately 20.43 percent. The poll was open 10/30/2019-12/14/2019. Our sample is roughly similar to the broader International Relations scholar population in terms of gender, academic rank and university type. Our sample includes a higher percentage of men and a higher percentage of tenured and tenure track faculty than the overall scholar population. Introduction By Emily Jackson, Eric Parajon, Susan Peterson, Ryan Powers, and Michael J. Tierney We are pleased to share the results of the 12th Teaching, Research and International Policy (TRIP) Snap Poll, fielded with the support of the Carnegie Corporation of New York. Our polls provide real-time data in the wake of significant policy proposals, during international crises, and on emerging foreign policy debates. In this poll, we asked questions on the 2020 Presidential Election, President Trump’s foreign policy actions, and impeachment.
    [Show full text]
  • MOTION to DISMISS V
    1 HONORABLE BRIAN MCDONALD Department 48 2 Noted for Consideration: April 27, 2020 Without Oral Argument 3 4 5 6 7 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KING 8 WASHINGTON LEAGUE FOR INCREASED 9 TRANSPARENCY AND ETHICS, a NO. 20-2-07428-4 SEA Washington non-profit corporation, 10 Plaintiff, 11 FOX DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS v. 12 FOX NEWS, FOX NEWS GROUP, FOX 13 NEWS CORPORATION, RUPERT MURDOCH, AT&T TV, COMCAST, 14 Defendants. 15 16 INTRODUCTION & RELIEF REQUESTED 17 Plaintiff WASHLITE seeks a judicial gag order against Fox News for airing supposedly 18 “deceptive” commentary about the Coronavirus outbreak and our nation’s response to it. But the 19 only deception here is in the Complaint. Fox’s opinion hosts have never described the Coronavirus 20 as a “hoax” or a “conspiracy,” but instead used those terms to comment on efforts to exploit the 21 pandemic for political points. Regardless, the claims here are frivolous because the statements at 22 issue are core political speech on matters of public concern. The First Amendment does not permit 23 censoring this type of speech based on the theory that it is “false” or “outrageous.” Nor does the law 24 of the State of Washington. The Complaint therefore should be dismissed as a matter of law. 25 MOTION TO DISMISS - 1 LAW OFFICES HARRIGAN LEYH FARMER & THOMSEN LLP 999 THIRD AVENUE, SUITE 4400 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98104 TEL (206) 623-1700 FAX (206) 623-8717 1 STATEMENT OF FACTS 2 The country has been gripped by an intense public debate about the novel Coronavirus 3 outbreak.
    [Show full text]
  • Extensions of Remarks E1015 EXTENSIONS of REMARKS
    May 19, 1999 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD Ð Extensions of Remarks E1015 EXTENSIONS OF REMARKS THE COURTS THWART THE EPA'S doing nothing at all and shutting down an CONGRATULATING THE MEN'S POWER GRAB industry. The governing case (Lead Indus- VOLLEYBALL TEAM OF BYU tries Association v. EPA) gave the EPA this broad power because it was issued by the HON. MICHAEL G. OXLEY D.C. Circuit five days before the Supreme HON. CHRIS CANNON OF OHIO Court's benzene decision, and thus was unaf- OF UTAH IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES fected by the latter ruling. But it was only a IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES matter of time before the EPA's power would Wednesday, May 19, 1999 collide with the Supreme Court's limita- Wednesday, May 19, 1999 Mr. OXLEY. Mr. Speaker, many of us tions. Mr. CANNON. Mr. Speaker, on May 8, 1999 voiced serious concern when the U.S. Envi- For those subject to the EPA's unchecked in Los Angeles, Brigham Young University ronmental Protection Agency approved strict authority, the day of reckoning came none won its first-ever NCAA men's volleyball title in new NAAQs standards affecting ozone and too soon. EPA issued these rules in July 1997 despite: their first-ever NCAA Tournament appearance. particulate matter levels. We warned that EPA They finished the season with a record of 30± was not basing the standards on good Its science advisory board's admonition that the new ozone rule did not deal with 1, suffering their only loss to Long Beach science, and indeed questioned whether the any new significant risk not already ad- State whom they beat in the finals.
    [Show full text]
  • International Child Abduction: Implementa- Tion of the Hague Convention on Civil Aspects of International Child Abduc- Tion
    INTERNATIONAL CHILD ABDUCTION: IMPLEMENTA- TION OF THE HAGUE CONVENTION ON CIVIL ASPECTS OF INTERNATIONAL CHILD ABDUC- TION HEARING BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED SIXTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION Thursday, October 14, 1999 Serial No. 106±89 Printed for the use of the Committee on International Relations ( U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 63±699 CC WASHINGTON : 2000 VerDate 11-MAY-2000 12:44 Jul 17, 2000 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 63699.TXT HINTREL1 PsN: HINTREL1 COMMITTEE ON INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS BENJAMIN A. GILMAN, New York, Chairman WILLIAM F. GOODLING, Pennsylvania SAM GEJDENSON, Connecticut JAMES A. LEACH, Iowa TOM LANTOS, California HENRY J. HYDE, Illinois HOWARD L. BERMAN, California DOUG BEREUTER, Nebraska GARY L. ACKERMAN, New York CHRISTOPHER H. SMITH, New Jersey ENI F.H. FALEOMAVAEGA, American DAN BURTON, Indiana Samoa ELTON GALLEGLY, California MATTHEW G. MARTINEZ, California ILEANA ROS-LEHTINEN, Florida DONALD M. PAYNE, New Jersey CASS BALLENGER, North Carolina ROBERT MENENDEZ, New Jersey DANA ROHRABACHER, California SHERROD BROWN, Ohio DONALD A. MANZULLO, Illinois CYNTHIA A. MCKINNEY, Georgia EDWARD R. ROYCE, California ALCEE L. HASTINGS, Florida PETER T. KING, New York PAT DANNER, Missouri STEVE CHABOT, Ohio EARL F. HILLIARD, Alabama MARSHALL ``MARK'' SANFORD, South BRAD SHERMAN, California Carolina ROBERT WEXLER, Florida MATT SALMON, Arizona STEVEN R. ROTHMAN, New Jersey AMO HOUGHTON, New York JIM DAVIS, Florida TOM CAMPBELL, California EARL POMEROY, North Dakota JOHN M. MCHUGH, New York WILLIAM D. DELAHUNT, Massachusetts KEVIN BRADY, Texas GREGORY W. MEEKS, New York RICHARD BURR, North Carolina BARBARA LEE, California PAUL E. GILLMOR, Ohio JOSEPH CROWLEY, New York GEORGE RADANOVICH, California JOSEPH M.
    [Show full text]
  • Primary Care: Estimating Leading Democratic Candidates' Health Plans
    CHAIRMEN Primary Care: MITCH DANIELS Estimating Leading Democratic Candidates’ Health Plans LEON PANETTA US Budget Watch 2020 TIM PENNY January 24, 2020 PRESIDENT Health care is the single largest part of the federal budget and a key driver of our MAYA MACGUINEAS unsustainably rising national debt.1 Rising health care costs also place growing burdens on households and businesses and – along with a significant uninsured rate DIRECTORS BARRY ANDERSON – have prompted those seeking higher office to propose bold solutions with ERSKINE BOWLES significant fiscal implications. CHARLES BOWSHER KENT CONRAD As part of our US Budget Watch 2020 project, the Committee for a Responsible Federal DAN CRIPPEN Budget has analyzed the plans of the four candidates polling the highest in the VIC FAZIO WILLIS GRADISON majority of national polls and polls in the first four primary states: Vice President Joe JANE HARMAN Biden, Mayor Pete Buttigieg, Senator Bernie Sanders, and Senator Elizabeth Warren. WILLIAM HOAGLAND JIM JONES For each plan, we score the fiscal impact of coverage and other spending provisions, LOU KERR JIM KOLBE reductions in current and proposed health care costs, direct offsets proposed as part MARJORIE MARGOLIES of their plans to expand coverage, and further offsets meant to finance remaining DAVE MCCURDY costs. We focus on federal fiscal impact rather than the effect on total national health JAMES MCINTYRE, JR. expenditures. DAVID MINGE MARNE OBERNAUER, JR. JUNE O’NEILL Our estimates are rough and rounded, based on our best understanding of how PAUL O’NEILL campaign-level detail translates into specific policies, and subject to change as more RUDOLPH PENNER details are made available.2 This report is for educational purposes and does not ROBERT REISCHAUER represent an endorsement of any candidate or any policy.
    [Show full text]
  • Giving Adequate Attention to Failings of Judicial Impartiality
    Impeach Brent Benjamin Now!? Giving Adequate Attention to Failings of Judicial Impartiality JEFFREY W. STEMPEL* TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION:M EN WITH NO REGRETS AND INADEQUATE CONCERN................... 2 II. CAPERTON V. MASSEY: JUDICIAL ERROR; WASTED RESOURCES; NEW CONSTITUTIONAL LAW—AND LIGHT TREATMENT OF THE PERPETRATOR ............................................................................................... 10 A. The Underlying Action............................................................................... 10 B. The 2004 West Virginia Supreme Court Elections..................................... 12 C. Review and Recusal ................................................................................... 13 D. The Supreme Court Intervenes .................................................................. 16 E. Caperton’s Test for Determining When Recusal Is Required by the Due Process Clause ........................................................................ 17 F. Comparing the “Reasonable Question as to Impartiality” Standard for Nonconstitutional Recusal Under Federal and State Law to the “Serious Risk of Bias” Standard for Constitutional Due Process Under Caperton....................................... 19 G. The Dissenters’ Defense of Justice Benjamin—And Defective Judging ...................................................................................... 25 H. Enablers: Reluctance To Criticize Justice Benjamin................................. 28 * © 2010 Jeffrey W. Stempel. Doris S. & Theodore B. Lee Professor
    [Show full text]
  • Biden Holds Steady, Warren Slips As the Iowa Caucuses Approach
    ABC NEWS/WASHINGTON POST POLL: 2020 Democrats EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE AFTER 12:01 a.m. Sunday, Jan. 26, 2020 Biden Holds Steady, Warren Slips As the Iowa Caucuses Approach Joe Biden’s holding his ground in preference nationally for the 2020 Democratic presidential nomination, with Bernie Sanders close by and a drop in support for Elizabeth Warren. Two new arrivals to the leaderboard come next in the latest ABC News/Washington Post poll: Mike Bloomberg and Andrew Yang. With the Feb. 3 Iowa caucuses drawing near, 77 percent of Democrats and Democratic-leaning independents nationally say they’re satisfied with their choice of candidates. Far fewer, 24 percent, are very satisfied, although that’s near the average in ABC/Post polls since 2000. This poll, produced for ABC by Langer Research Associates, finds plenty of room for movement: Just about half of leaned Democrats are very enthusiastic about their choice, and 53 percent say they’d consider supporting a different candidate. Warren, while weaker as a first choice, leads in second-choice preference. Further, while Biden continues to prevail by a wide margin as the candidate with the best chance to defeat Donald Trump in the general election, his score on the measure has slipped slightly, from 45 percent in July to 38 percent now. Eighteen percent pick Sanders as best against Trump; 10 percent, Warren. Biden does best in vote preference among likely voters, defined here as those who say they’re registered and certain to vote in their state’s primary or caucuses. He has 34 percent support in this group, leading Sanders, at 22 percent, and Warren, 14 percent.
    [Show full text]
  • Ipsos Poll Conducted for Thomson Reuters Core Political Data
    Ipsos Poll Conducted for Thomson Reuters Core Political Data AUGUST 7, 2019 © 2019 Ipsos. All rights reserved. Contains Ipsos' Confidential and Proprietary information and may not be disclosed or reproduced without the prior written consent of Ipsos. © 2019 Ipsos 1 IPSOS POLL CONDUCTED FOR REUTERS Core Political Data These are findings from an Ipsos poll conducted for date August 1-5, 2019 For the survey, a sample of including ages 2,129 1,795 807 772 140 Registered Democratic Republican Independent 18+ Americans Voters Registered Registered Registered Voters Voters Voters were interviewed online © 2019 Ipsos 2 IPSOS POLL CONDUCTED FOR REUTERS Core Political Data The precision of the Reuters/Ipsos online polls is measured using a credibility interval. In this case, the poll has a credibility interval of plus or minus the following percentage points 2.4 2.6 3.9 4.0 9.4 All Adults All Registered Democratic Republican Independent Voters Registered Voters Registered Voters Registered Voters For more information about credibility intervals, please see the appendix. © 2019 Ipsos 3 IPSOS POLL CONDUCTED FOR REUTERS Core Political Data • The data were weighted to the U.S. current population data by: – Gender – Age – Education – Ethnicity – Region • Statistical margins of error are not applicable to online polls. • All sample surveys and polls may be subject to other sources of error, including, but not limited to coverage error and measurement error. • Figures marked by an asterisk (*) indicate a percentage value of greater than zero but less than one half of one per cent. • Where figures do not sum to 100, this is due to the effects of rounding.
    [Show full text]
  • Administration of Barack Obama, 2014 Remarks at A
    Administration of Barack Obama, 2014 Remarks at a Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee Dinner in Chicago, Illinois May 22, 2014 The President. First of all, to Fred and Dan, I'm so grateful for you guys hosting us here today. I'm trying to remember, was it 2 years ago or 3 years ago that I was here? Audience member. Two years ago. And you were here in—— The President. Well, I've been here a lot, I know. [Laughter] I meant most recently. I have abused Fred's hospitality for quite some time. But it is wonderful to be home now that is has warmed up. [Laughter] And it is wonderful to be with a lot of old friends. There are a couple other people I just want to acknowledge real quickly. Obviously, our Governor, Pat Quinn, is in the house. Please give him a big round of applause. Pat is doing a lot of hard stuff, and he's doing it the right way. And I'm very appreciative for all the efforts that he's making down in Springfield. We also have two of our finest public servants in the country. The first has the thankless job of being the chair of the Democratic senatorial reelection committee, and that is our outstanding Senator from Colorado, Michael Bennet. And the second guy is the person who, upon my election to the United States Senate, essentially taught me everything that he knew and kept me out of trouble and supported me every step of the way when I ran for President and has been a great friend and champion on behalf of working families not just in Illinois, but all across the country.
    [Show full text]
  • Election Summary Report Closed Primary Fayette County June 02, 2020 Summary For: All Contests, All Districts, All Tabulators, All Counting Groups Unofficial Results
    Page: 1 of 29 6/23/2020 11:38:57 AM Election Summary Report Closed Primary Fayette County June 02, 2020 Summary for: All Contests, All Districts, All Tabulators, All Counting Groups Unofficial Results Elector Group Counting Group Ballots Voters Registered Voters Turnout Democratic Election Day 5,351 5,351 13.38% Absentee 1,465 1,465 3.66% Mail-In 6,088 6,088 15.23% Provisional 136 136 0.34% Total 13,040 13,040 39,984 32.61% Republican Election Day 7,444 7,444 24.86% Absentee 455 455 1.52% Mail-In 1,947 1,947 6.50% Provisional 207 207 0.69% Total 10,053 10,053 29,944 33.57% Total Election Day 12,795 12,795 18.30% Absentee 1,920 1,920 2.75% Mail-In 8,035 8,035 11.49% Provisional 343 343 0.49% Total 23,093 23,093 69,928 33.02% Precincts Reported: 77 of 77 (100.00%) Registered Voters: 23,093 of 69,928 (33.02%) Ballots Cast: 23,093 President of the United States (DEM) (Vote for 1) DEM Precincts Reported: 77 of 77 (100.00%) Election Day Absentee Mail-In Provisional Total Times Cast 5,351 1,465 6,088 136 13,040 / 39,984 32.61% Candidate Party Election Day Absentee Mail-In Provisional Total Joseph R. Biden DEM 2,996 1,165 5,027 75 9,263 71.04% Bernie Sanders DEM 816 157 562 28 1,563 11.99% Tulsi Gabbard DEM 420 36 165 10 631 4.84% Total Votes 4,797 1,410 5,905 123 12,235 Election Day Absentee Mail-In Provisional Total Donald Trump WRITE-IN 309 30 66 6 411 3.15% Donald J.
    [Show full text]
  • Biden Is Only Leading Dem to Top Trump in Ohio, Quinnipiac University Poll Finds; Former V.P
    Peter A. Brown, Assistant Director (203) 535-6203 Rubenstein Pat Smith (212) 843-8026 FOR RELEASE: JULY 25, 2019 BIDEN IS ONLY LEADING DEM TO TOP TRUMP IN OHIO, QUINNIPIAC UNIVERSITY POLL FINDS; FORMER V.P. HAS BIG LEAD IN DEMOCRATIC PRIMARY Former Vice President Joseph Biden leads President Donald Trump 50 – 42 percent in the critical swing state of Ohio, the only leading Democratic candidate to top the Republican incumbent, according to a Quinnipiac University poll released today. The other leading Democratic contenders each are locked in a dead heat with President Trump, the independent Quinnipiac (KWIN-uh-pe-ack) University Poll finds: 46 percent for Trump to Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders with 45 percent; Trump at 46 percent to Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren at 45 percent; 44 – 44 percent between Trump and California Sen. Kamala Harris; 44 – 44 percent between Trump and South Bend Mayor Pete Buttigieg; 44 percent for Trump to 43 percent for New Jersey Sen. Cory Booker. Women, black voters and independent voters give Biden his lead in the matchup with Trump. Biden leads 53 – 40 percent among women, as men are split with 46 percent for Biden and 45 percent for Trump. White voters are divided, with 48 percent for Trump and 45 percent for Biden. Black voters go Democratic 84 – 8 percent. Independent voters go to Biden 55 – 32 percent. Republicans back Trump 86 – 10 percent as Biden leads 96 – 2 percent among Democrats. “Former Vice President Joseph Biden calls himself a blue-collar guy. With Ohio certainly a blue-collar state, it is no surprise he is the Democrat who runs best against President Donald Trump and is solidly ahead in the Democratic primary in the Buckeye State,” said Peter Brown, assistant director of the Quinnipiac University Poll.
    [Show full text]
  • Teenage MMA Fighter from Downey Wins First Championship
    Thursday, Feb. 20, 2020 Vol. 18 No. 46 EYE ON OUR SCHOOLS OBITUARIES NEWS REAL ESTATE Living the six pillars Karol Morrison Students mimic C21 Peak supports of character passes away Rosie the Riveter Easterseals SEE PAGE 2 SEE PAGE 4 SEE PAGE 8 SEE PAGE 15 Downey Jury restaurant grades Rubio’s Fresh Mexican Grill finds man 12010 Lakewood Blvd. Date Inspected: 2/18/20 Grade: A FridayWeekend72˚ guilty Frantones at a 9148 Telegraph Rd. Glance Date Inspected: 2/18/20 SaturdayFriday 6862˚⁰ of triple Grade: A Arthurs 8813 Lakewood Blvd. Sunday 65˚70⁰ murder Date Inspected: 2/18/20 Saturday Grade: A Jade Harris killed three Budy Express people in 2012 after 11901 Lakewood Blvd. THINGS TO DO responding to an online Date Inspected: 2/18/20 advertisement for a vehicle Grade: A for sale. Tacos Don Goyo DOWNEY - A Los Angeles 8502 Telegraph Rd. man was convicted last week of Date Inspected: 2/18/20 killing two women and a man at Grade: A a Downey business nearly eight years ago. Los Amigos Golf Course Black History Month Jurors deliberated for about Restaurant Panel Discussion four hours before finding Jade 7295 Quill Dr. Saturday - Columbia Memorial Space Douglas Harris, 37, guilty of three Date Inspected: 2/14/20 Center, 1 pm counts of murder, two counts of Grade: A attempted murder, four counts A panel discussion highlighting several key people who helped get the US to of kidnapping for carjacking and Hully Gully one count of felon with a firearm. PHOTO BY WILLIAM ODIS MARTIN the moon.
    [Show full text]