The Importance of Husserl's Phenomenology of Internal Time

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Importance of Husserl's Phenomenology of Internal Time THEIMPORTANCEOFHUSSERL'SPHENOMENOLOGYOFINTERNAL TIME-CONSCIOUSNESS FOR MUSIC ANALYSIS AND COMPOSITION GeorgBoenn University of Glamorgan Cardiff School of Creative and Cultural Industries ABSTRACT between the temporal position of a phase and the now- point. On the other hand, there is a comparison process Starting with Edmund Husserl’s seminal text[7] we would betweenthecurrentperceptualcontentandpastproten- like to explore in this paper how musical perception is tions. We assume that learning processes originate from based on the conscious reduction of acoustic and spatio- here, which influence the generation of further proten- temporal diversity into unity. In his lectures Husserl ex- tions. emplifies his views with an analysis about the perception Recently, David Huron[6] drew from the current body of a single soundanda sequenceof soundswithin a melody. of research in cognitive musicology with regards to learn- They deliver an informative basis for us in order to re- ing and expectation processes in music listening in order think the perception of musical time and the perception of to develop his own ITPRA theory 1 . Huron’s focus is on rhythms in particular. We demonstrate the impact of his the emotional responses to expectations that root deeply phenomenology on music analysis and composition. in the history of human evolution. Based upon Husserl’s Phenomenology and upon no- 1. INTRODUCTION tions of the Gestalt-Psychology we programmed tools that analyse music recordings in search for temporal expres- Husserl’s lectures have been very influential on musicians sive profiles of performances and which generate tran- and composers during the past century. We mention the scriptions representing the underlying score[1]. To achieve conducting school of Sergiu Celibidache, especially his these goals we had to develop a deeper understandingabout student Markand Thakar[16][15], Husserl influences on the perception of rhythmic Gestalten and how musicians Henri Bergson and throughhim on french composer Charles express themselves through timing. This led also to no- Koechlin. Furthermore, we see references to Bergson in tions of self-organisation, which feed back into composi- Susanne Langer[9] and we find a discussion of her views tion techniques of polyphony and variation. on ’time as passage’ and references to Koechlin and Berg- son in an essay by Eliott Carter[2][12]. It is also noted that the Berlin school of Gestalt-Psychology has its roots in the 3. ONSET RHYTHMS school of Brentano, with whom Husserl, Carl Stumpf and Christian von Ehrenfels studied at the same time. There The onset of a sound is very important for the percep- are numerousreferences to Gestalt-Psychology in the wider tion and recognition of musical timbres and the learning musicological field: from Diana Deutsch’s Psychology of of timbre categories. “[...] Researchers [...] have found Music[3] over Tenney’s Meta-Hodos[14] back to Heinrich that [sound source] identification relies on onsets. Iden- Schenker’s Ur-linie[11]. tification is accurate if listeners hear onsets, and poor if they don’t. [...] the lack of onsets made it harder to iden- tify the blown instruments in particular.”[8] If the presence 2. RETENTIONS AND PROTENTIONS or non-presence of the onsets are of such an importance it might well be that their occurences leave markers in the Husserl’s term of retentional consciousness[7] is related consciousness which enable and support certain types of to what cognitive psychology later describes as working rhythm processing in the brain. memory. The counterpart to the retentions are the proten- From the phenomenologicalpoint of view an onset is a tions that point towards the horizon of expectations. The primal impression from where a field of running-off con- origin of the protentions are the now-points. Protentions tinua starts to devlop that belongs to the entire time-object are expectations about the immediate future. They are ’sound’. Husserl states that the now-point is a “creative born immediately out of the now-point and are derived now”, from where a chain of ever new now-points starts. from the current perceptions, which reside in the impres- Husserl is then interested in the effects on the intentional sional consciousness. The consciousness compares per- consciousness caused by the primal impressions. The con- manently the contents of the perception originating from sciousness creates for every new now-point of the sound the now-point with retentional phases of earlier content within the working memory. Those phases sink further 1 ITPRA stands for the sequence of the following expectation-related down into unconsciousness the more distance is created responses: Imagination, Tension, Prediction, Reaction and Appraisal. Figure 2. A perceived rhythm E1 and its four retentional layers E2-5 and also by Hegel[4], which leads to the awareness of rhythmic relationships between and within sounds, their dynamism and their self-induced organisation. Husserl speaks of the consciousness of succession. It means that the relationship of two sounds (A - B) sinks Figure 1. OE series of now-points; OE’ Sinking-down; down in the consciousness and its content changes as well EE’ Continuum of phases (now point with horizon of the as its perception through the flow of consciousness, be- past); E-> Series of nows which possibly will be filled cause the consciousness of the individual sounds A and with other objects B as well as their relationship remain within the reten- tions that Husserl calls the primary memory. These are a vertical phase continuum of all past now-points of the the reference points for all future sounds, whose new rela- time-object, it samples at that particuar moment the reten- tionsships are integrated with the past sounds and relations tional phases within the running-off continua (see figure 1 through the retentional memory. Here all sounds are being for Husserl’s original diagram). The entire process of the continously transformed “the way that” they appear. consciousness has a double intentionality. It means that The physical inter-onset-time between the sounds A the consciousness directs itself towards the perception of and B is of main importance for the perception of the du- the sound in its unity as a time-object, but at the same time ration of sound A. Although a pause might happen after A it is capable of perceiving all minute changes of the sound for reasons of articulation, A might have decayed before through the internal time consciousness. the attack of sound B, their relationship remains charac- To perceive a rhythm means to relate one sound with terised by the full time span bewteen them. Of course, other sounds by means of duration ratios and thereby to one can connect this pause with both sounds and obtain learn and to recognise explicit rhythm categories[5][10]. a relation of three elements. With regards to articulation These processes are based on the selective division of the and phrasing this type of musical silence between notes time-flow by the attentive consciousness. On the other becomes more stringent and convincing if it is carried out hand there is duration inherent to the sound, a continu- with proportions in mind, proportions that take care of the ous flow and metamorphosis from one state into the other, conscious participation of all three elements in that se- a multitude of dissolutions, cross-fades and indiscernible quence: A - silence - B. It is also clear that the now-points spectromorphological changes. The latter refers to the of the onsets and the perceived durations and relationships experience of subjective duration that Charles Koechlin between different sounds remain at the same position in recognised after being influenced by Bergson[2]. Susanne time within the retentional consciousness. Only in this K. Langer said: ”The primary illusion of music is the way it is possible to learn and to recognise rhythmic cat- sonorous image of passage, abstracted from all actuality egories and their Gestalten. According to Husserl, this is to become free and plastic and entirely perceptible.”[9] It due to the a priori condition of the homogeneity of abso- is that notion of passage that has been very influentual lute time and has obvious implications for the perception on Eliott Carter. The free development of passage be- of time objects. comes also the prevalent theme within acousmatic music It is now possible to draw a map of the original time that wants to free itself from all academic and worn-out field within the rententional consciousness. From the con- ways of dealing with sounds and composition[13]. tinuum of the now-points we select only the note onsets and inter-onset times. It is further assumed that the mem- 4. RETENTIONAL RHYTHMS ory keeps the time-object ’note’, which consists of its on- set, its sound continuum and its duration, within a contin- We would like to focus not only on one side of the dou- uous feedback loop. The following example in figure 2 ble intentionality of the consciousness, which is becoming illustrates the time field by using a ternary rhythm as its aware of the sounds as streaming entities of passage, but base. also to consider the other intention understood by Husserl The original rhythm is presented here on the 1st staff with the next four retentional layers on seperate staves belows. Every note on the retentional layers represents the starting point of a new cycle of the feedback loop that keeps the original note as a time object in memory. Lines connecting the notes illustrate the sequence of on- set repetitions per feedback loop. The crossovers of the sequences are based on the different durations within the original rhythm. This polyphony of retentional rhythms has a number of remarkable properties. All layers are different from each other. None of them is identical to the original rhythm Figure 3.
Recommended publications
  • Effects of Learning on Dissonance Judgments
    journal of interdisciplinary music studies 2014-2016, volume 8, issue 1&2, art. #16081201, pp. 11-28 open peer commentary article Effects of learning on dissonance judgments Diana Omigie1,2,3,4, Delphine Dellacherie 1,5 and Séverine Samson1,2 1UFR de Psychologie, Laboratoire PSITEC-EA 4072, Université de Lille 2 Hôpital de la Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris 3 Centre de Neuroimagerie de Recherche - CENIR, 7-75013 Paris, 4 Inserm U 1127, CNRS UMR 7225, Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06 UMR S 1127, Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle épinière - ICM, F-75013, Paris 5 Unité de Neuropediatrie, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire, Lille Background in music cognition: A frequently posed question regards the origins of the aversion most listeners have to dissonant sounds. In the domain of psychology, attempts to address this question have included examining how early similar biases may be found in infants as well as whether they exist at all in non-human species. In contrast, another line of work has, rather than focusing on potential biological predispositions, examined the specific role that musical exposure and training may play in driving emotional judgments of dissonance. Background in music history: Speculation as to why consonant sounds are preferred to dissonant sounds dates back many centuries to the ancient Greek notion that beauty is intrinsically related to proportions. More recently, the prevailing theory is that sensory dissonance arises as a result of mechanical interference within the organ of hearing, although another plausible theory states that consonance preferences are driven by a preference for harmonicity. Aims: The current review aims to re-examine the direct evidence that may be found for a role of learning mechanisms in dissonance processing, and in doing so inform theories of dissonance perception.
    [Show full text]
  • Gestalt Psychology and the Anti-Metaphysical Project of the Aufbau
    Science and Experience/ Science of Experience: Gestalt Psychology and the Anti-Metaphysical Project of the Aufbau Uljana Feest Technische Universität Berlin This paper investigates the way in which Rudolf Carnap drew on Gestalt psychological notions when deªning the basic elements of his constitutional system. I argue that while Carnap’s conceptualization of basic experience was compatible with ideas articulated by members of the Berlin/Frankfurt school of Gestalt psychology, his formal analysis of the relationship between two ba- sic experiences (“recollection of similarity”) was not. This is consistent, given that Carnap’s aim was to provide a uniªed reconstruction of scientiªc knowl- edge, as opposed to the mental processes by which we gain knowledge about the world. It is this last point that put him in marked contrast to some of the older epistemological literature, which he cited when pointing to the complex character of basic experience. While this literature had the explicit goal of overcoming metaphysical presuppositions by means of an analysis of conscious- ness, Carnap viewed these attempts as still carrying metaphysical baggage. By choosing the autopsychological basis, he expressed his intellectual depth to their antimetaphysical impetus. By insisting on the metaphysical neutrality of his system, he emphasized that he was carrying out a project in which they had not succeeded. 1. Introduction In his 1928 book, Der Logische Aufbau der Welt, Rudolf Carnap presented what he called a “constructional system” (Carnap 1967). The aim of this system was to demonstrate that all of our scientiªc concepts are logically derivable from more “basic” concepts in a hierarchical fashion.
    [Show full text]
  • Sound Adaptation: How Our Voices Changed Including a Pilot Exhibit at the Museum Für Naturkunde Berlin
    Zusammenfassung Das Forschungsprojekt wird von vier Partnern durchgeführt, wobei alle Arbeitsaufgaben kollaborativ strukturiert sind. Wir werden ‚Mixed Methods‘ auf zwei Arten realisieren: 1. Typischerweise konzentriert sich Informatik auf das Prüfen von Systemen. Im Gegensatz dazu zielen Digital Humanities darauf, Hypothesen zu testen. Wir werden beide Methoden kombinieren. 2. Überwachtes maschinelles Lernen ermöglicht eine Mischung aus qualitativer post quem Anpassung der Hypothesen an die Daten und ‚harter‘ Überprüfung von Hypothesen über die statistische Zuverlässigkeit. Da Systeme/Algorithmen in unserem Projekt Teil des Experiments sind (kein Mechanismus, der Evidenz hervorbringt), führt dies zu einem gemischten Methodenansatz, in dem sich hermeneutische Intervention und maschinelles Lernen modular ergänzen. Als Fallstudie werden wir uns auf (digitale) Objekte konzentrieren, die von den Digital Humanities kaum untersucht worden sind: Lautaufnahmen. Lautaufnahmen bergen Bedeutungsschichten, die Texte nicht innehaben. Sie sind eine wertvolle Quelle für die performativen Aspekte von Kultur und für Transfers zwischen Natur und Kultur. Der Großteil des Materials in europäischen Lautarchiven ist nicht zugänglich, da semantische Metadaten entweder unzureichend oder gar nicht vorhanden sind. Wir wollen überwachtes maschinelles Lernen (Mustererkennung) dazu verwenden, die Bestände auf bestimmte Lauteigenschaften hin durchsuchbar zu machen. Wir kodieren Algorithmen darauf, akustische Eigenschaften in Lautsignalen zu identifizieren, die handlungsrelevante
    [Show full text]
  • Philosophia Scientiæ, 19-3 | 2015, « the Bounds of Naturalism » [Online], Online Since 03 November 2017, Connection on 10 November 2020
    Philosophia Scientiæ Travaux d'histoire et de philosophie des sciences 19-3 | 2015 The Bounds of Naturalism Experimental Constraints and Phenomenological Requiredness Charles-Édouard Niveleau and Alexandre Métraux (dir.) Electronic version URL: http://journals.openedition.org/philosophiascientiae/1121 DOI: 10.4000/philosophiascientiae.1121 ISSN: 1775-4283 Publisher Éditions Kimé Printed version Date of publication: 30 October 2015 ISBN: 978-2-84174-727-6 ISSN: 1281-2463 Electronic reference Charles-Édouard Niveleau and Alexandre Métraux (dir.), Philosophia Scientiæ, 19-3 | 2015, « The Bounds of Naturalism » [Online], Online since 03 November 2017, connection on 10 November 2020. URL : http://journals.openedition.org/philosophiascientiae/1121 ; DOI : https://doi.org/10.4000/ philosophiascientiae.1121 This text was automatically generated on 10 November 2020. Tous droits réservés 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS The Bounds of Naturalism: A Plea for Modesty Charles-Édouard Niveleau and Alexandre Métraux A Philosopher in the Lab. Carl Stumpf on Philosophy and Experimental Sciences Riccardo Martinelli La phénoménologie expérimentale d’Albert Michotte : un problème de traduction Sigrid Leyssen Objectifying the Phenomenal in Experimental Psychology: Titchener and Beyond Gary Hatfield Spatial Elements in Visual Awareness. Challenges for an Intrinsic “Geometry” of the Visible Liliana Albertazzi The Phenomenology of the Invisible: From Visual Syntax to “Shape from Shapes” Baingio Pinna, Jan Koenderink and Andrea van Doorn The Deep Structure of Lives Michael Kubovy Philosophia Scientiæ, 19-3 | 2015 2 The Bounds of Naturalism: A Plea for Modesty Charles-Édouard Niveleau and Alexandre Métraux Many thanks to William Blythe for his insightful linguistic corrections on the English text. 1 Introduction 1 The articles published in this volume of Philosophia Scientiæ address specific issues in contemporary psychological research.
    [Show full text]
  • CLINE-DISSERTATION.Pdf (2.391Mb)
    Copyright by John F. Cline 2012 The Dissertation Committee for John F. Cline Certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: Permanent Underground: Radical Sounds and Social Formations in 20th Century American Musicking Committee: Mark C. Smith, Supervisor Steven Hoelscher Randolph Lewis Karl Hagstrom Miller Shirley Thompson Permanent Underground: Radical Sounds and Social Formations in 20th Century American Musicking by John F. Cline, B.A.; M.A. Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at Austin in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Texas at Austin May 2012 Dedication This dissertation is dedicated to my mother and father, Gary and Linda Cline. Without their generous hearts, tolerant ears, and (occasionally) open pocketbooks, I would have never made it this far, in any endeavor. A second, related dedication goes out to my siblings, Nicholas and Elizabeth. We all get the help we need when we need it most, don’t we? Acknowledgements First and foremost, I would like to thank my dissertation supervisor, Mark Smith. Even though we don’t necessarily work on the same kinds of topics, I’ve always appreciated his patient advice. I’m sure he’d be loath to use the word “wisdom,” but his open mind combined with ample, sometimes non-academic experience provided reassurances when they were needed most. Following closely on Mark’s heels is Karl Miller. Although not technically my supervisor, his generosity with his time and his always valuable (if sometimes painful) feedback during the dissertation writing process was absolutely essential to the development of the project, especially while Mark was abroad on a Fulbright.
    [Show full text]
  • Handbuch Mus K- Psycholog E
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/322339257 Ursprünge der Musik Chapter · January 2018 CITATIONS READS 0 71 1 author: Reinhard Kopiez Hochschule für Musik, Theater und Medien Hannover 134 PUBLICATIONS 2,025 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: Neuromyths in Music Education View project Performance Research View project All content following this page was uploaded by Reinhard Kopiez on 06 August 2018. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. De Muskpsychologe st en fasznerendes Gebet an der Schnttstelle von Psychologe, Muskwssenschaft und Musk pädagogk. Ihre Fragestellungen beschäftgen sch (Hrsg.) bespels wese mt dem Hörverhalten, dem Muszeren und Vermtteln von Musk, der muskalschen Begabung, dem Muskgeschmack oder dem kulturellen Muskgebrauch. Im Handbuch der Muskpsychologe wdmen sch über aus- gewesene Autornnen und Autoren aus den Dszplnen der Psychologe, Muskpädagogk, Muskwssenschaft, Medzn, Neurowssenschaft und Musktherape desen Themen und führen n de neuesten Erkenntnsse hrer Fachgebete en. Lehmann / Kopiez Kopiez / Lehmann Aus dem Inhalt: • Muskkultur und muskalsche Sozalsaton • Muskalsche Entwcklung • Musk und Meden • Muszeren • Grundlagen der Muskwahrnehmung • Emotonale und andere Wrkungen • Forschung Andreas Lehmann Handbuch Reinhard Kopiez (Hrsg.) Mus k- Handbuch psycholog e Hogrefe Verlagsgruppe ISBN 978-3-456-85591-2 Musikpsychologie Göttingen · Bern · Wien · Oxford
    [Show full text]
  • Foundations in Music Psychology
    Foundations in Music Psy chol ogy Theory and Research edited by Peter Jason Rentfrow and Daniel J. Levitin The MIT Press Cambridge, Mas sa chu setts London, England © 2019 Mas sa chu setts Institute of Technology All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form by any electronic or mechanical means (including photocopying, recording, or information storage and retrieval) without permission in writing from the publisher. This book was set in Stone Serif by Westchester Publishing Ser vices. Printed and bound in the United States of Amer i ca. Library of Congress Cataloging- in- Publication Data Names: Rentfrow, Peter J. | Levitin, Daniel J. Title: Foundations in music psy chol ogy : theory and research / edited by Peter Jason Rentfrow and Daniel J. Levitin. Description: Cambridge, MA : The MIT Press, 2019. | Includes bibliographical references and index. Identifiers: LCCN 2018018401 | ISBN 9780262039277 (hardcover : alk. paper) Subjects: LCSH: Music— Psychological aspects. | Musical perception. | Musical ability. Classification: LCC ML3830 .F7 2019 | DDC 781.1/1— dc23 LC rec ord available at https:// lccn . loc . gov / 2018018401 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Contents I Music Perception 1 Pitch: Perception and Neural Coding 3 Andrew J. Oxenham 2 Rhythm 33 Henkjan Honing and Fleur L. Bouwer 3 Perception and Cognition of Musical Timbre 71 Stephen McAdams and Kai Siedenburg 4 Pitch Combinations and Grouping 121 Frank A. Russo 5 Musical Intervals, Scales, and Tunings: Auditory Repre sen ta tions and Neural Codes 149 Peter Cariani II Music Cognition 6 Musical Expectancy 221 Edward W. Large and Ji Chul Kim 7 Musicality across the Lifespan 265 Sandra E.
    [Show full text]
  • Simultaneous Consonance in Music Perception and Composition
    Running head: SIMULTANEOUS CONSONANCE 1 Simultaneous Consonance in Music Perception and Composition Peter M. C. Harrison1 & Marcus T. Pearce1,2 1 Cognitive Science Research Group, Queen Mary University of London 2 Center for Music in the Brain, Aarhus University Author Note This article has been peer-reviewed and accepted for publication in Psychological Review. © 2019, American Psychological Association. This paper is not the copy of record and may not exactly replicate the final, authoritative version of the article. Please donot copy or cite without authors’ permission. The final article will be available, upon publication, via its DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000169. Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Peter M. C. Harrison, School of Electronic Engineering and Computer Science, Queen Mary University of London, E1 4NS. E-mail: [email protected] SIMULTANEOUS CONSONANCE 2 Abstract Simultaneous consonance is a salient perceptual phenomenon corresponding to the perceived pleasantness of simultaneously sounding musical tones. Various competing theories of consonance have been proposed over the centuries, but recently a consensus has developed that simultaneous consonance is primarily driven by harmonicity perception. Here we question this view, substantiating our argument by critically reviewing historic consonance research from a broad variety of disciplines, re-analyzing consonance perception data from four previous behavioral studies representing more than 500 participants, and modeling three Western musical corpora representing more than 100,000 compositions. We conclude that simultaneous consonance is a composite phenomenon that derives in large part from three phenomena: interference, periodicity/harmonicity, and cultural familiarity. We formalize this conclusion with a computational model that predicts a musical chord’s simultaneous consonance from these three features, and release this model in an open-source R package, incon, alongside 15 other computational models also evaluated in this paper.
    [Show full text]
  • Sounds of Science – Schall Im Labor (1800–1930)
    MAX-PLANCK-INSTITUT FÜR WISSENSCHAFTSGESCHICHTE Max Planck Institute for the History of Science 2008 PREPRINT 346 Julia Kursell (ed.) Sounds of Science – Schall im Labor (1800–1930) TABLE OF CONTENTS Introductory Remarks Julia Kursell 3 „Erzklang“ oder „missing fundamental“: Kulturgeschichte als Signalanalyse Bernhard Siegert 7 Klangfiguren (a hit in the lab) Peter Szendy 21 Sound Objects Julia Kursell 29 A Cosmos for Pianoforte d’Amore: Some Remarks on “Miniature Estrose” by Marco Stroppa Florian Hoelscher 39 The “Muscle Telephone”: The Undiscovered Start of Audification in the 1870s Florian Dombois 41 Silence in the Laboratory: The History of Soundproof Rooms Henning Schmidgen 47 Cats and People in the Psychoacoustics Lab Jonathan Sterne 63 The Resonance of “Bodiless Entities”: Some Epistemological Remarks on the Radio-Voice Wolfgang Hagen 73 VLF and Musical Aesthetics Douglas Kahn 81 Ästhetik des Signals Daniel Gethmann 89 Producing, Representing, Constructing: Towards a Media-Aesthetic Theory of Action Related to Categories of Experimental Methods Elena Ungeheuer 99 Standardizing Aesthetics: Physicists, Musicians, and Instrument Makers in Nineteenth-Century Germany Myles W. Jackson 113 Introductory Remarks The following collection of papers documents the workshop “Sounds of Science – Schall im Labor, 1800 to 1930,” carried out at the Max Planck Institute for the History of Science, Berlin October 5 to 7, 2006. It was organized within the context of the project “Experimentalization of Life: Configurations between Science, Art, and Technology” situated in Department III of the Institute. While the larger project has discussed topics such as “Experimental Cultures,” the “Materiality of Time Relations in Life Sciences, Art, and Technology (1830-1930),” “Science and the City,” “Relations between the Living and the Lifeless,” and the “Shape of Experiment” in workshops and conferences, this workshop asked about the role sound plays in the configurations among science, technology and the arts, focusing on the years between 1800 and 1930.
    [Show full text]
  • The Origins of Music: Preface
    MUSPR 9/14/99 11:55 AM Page ix Preface The present volume is based on a workshop entitled “The Origins of Music” arranged by the Institute for Biomusicology in the Etruscan town of Fiesole outside Florence in late May 1997. As the workshop was the first international gathering held under the auspices of the Institute since its founding in 1995, a few words are in order concerning the Institute’s background. In 1982 one of us (NLW) published his dissertation Den musikaliska hjärnan (“The Musical Brain”) in Swedish, which was followed in 1991 by the book Biomusicology: Neurophysiological, Neuropsychological and Evolutionary Perspectives on the Origins and Purposes of Music. Both works gave expression to long-standing curiosity on the part of a musicologist regarding what light modern neuroscience might shed on questions such as the origins, evolutionary development, and purposes of music, questions that he felt were incompletely dealt with by his dis- cipline. Ever since his student days, this musicologist had been on a quest for a musicological paradigm to complement traditional approaches. He now hoped to find in modern biology what he had not found in Hume’s empiricism, in the logical empiricism of the Vienna and Chicago schools, or in the phenomenological trends that flourished in the 1940s and 1950s. Time was on his side. Since the Second World War, and more particularly in recent decades, the neurosciences and behavioral biology have made significant strides in areas relevant to the foundations of musicology. Thus there is now hope of gaining an understanding of the processes of musical cognition as well as biological factors that, together with cultural determinants, shaped mankind’s musical behavior and the rich global repertoire of musical structures it has produced.
    [Show full text]
  • Music, Neurology, and Neuroscience
    UC Office of the President Recent Work Title Music, neurology, andpsychology in the nineteenthcentury Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/47x082v7 Journal Progress in Brain Research, 216 ISSN 0079-6123 Authors Graziano, Amy B Johnson, Julene K Publication Date 2015 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California CHAPTER Music, neurology, and psychology in the nineteenth century 2 Amy B. Graziano*,1, Julene K. Johnson† *Division of Music History, Hall-Musco Conservatory of Music, Chapman University, Orange, CA, USA †Institute for Health & Aging, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA 1Corresponding author: Tel.: 714-997-6897; Fax: 714-997-744-7671 e-mail address: [email protected] Abstract This chapter examines connections between research in music, neurology, and psychology during the late-nineteenth century. Researchers in all three disciplines investigated how music is processed by the brain. Psychologists and comparative musicologists, such as Carl Stumpf, thought in terms of multiple levels of sensory processing and mental representation. Early thinking about music processing can be linked to the start of Gestalt psychology. Neurologists such as August Knoblauch also discussed multiple levels of music processing, basing specu- lation on ideas about language processing. Knoblauch and others attempted to localize music function in the brain. Other neurologists, such as John Hughlings Jackson, discussed a disso- ciation between music as an emotional system and language as an intellectual system. Richard Wallaschek seems to have been the only one from the late-nineteenth century to synthesize ideas from musicology, psychology, and neurology. He used ideas from psychology to explain music processing and audience reactions and also used case studies from neurology to support arguments about the nature of music.
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Learning on Dissonance Judgments
    journal of interdisciplinary music studies 2014-2016, volume 8, issue 1&2, art. #16081201, pp. 11-28 open peer commentary article Effects of learning on dissonance judgments Diana Omigie1,2,3,4, Delphine Dellacherie 1,5 and Séverine Samson1,2 1UFR de Psychologie, Laboratoire PSITEC-EA 4072, Université de Lille 2 Hôpital de la Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris 3 Centre de Neuroimagerie de Recherche - CENIR, 7-75013 Paris, 4 Inserm U 1127, CNRS UMR 7225, Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06 UMR S 1127, Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle épinière - ICM, F-75013, Paris 5 Unité de Neuropediatrie, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire, Lille Background in music cognition: A frequently posed question regards the origins of the aversion most listeners have to dissonant sounds. In the domain of psychology, attempts to address this question have included examining how early similar biases may be found in infants as well as whether they exist at all in non-human species. In contrast, another line of work has, rather than focusing on potential biological predispositions, examined the specific role that musical exposure and training may play in driving emotional judgments of dissonance. Background in music history: Speculation as to why consonant sounds are preferred to dissonant sounds dates back many centuries to the ancient Greek notion that beauty is intrinsically related to proportions. More recently, the prevailing theory is that sensory dissonance arises as a result of mechanical interference within the organ of hearing, although another plausible theory states that consonance preferences are driven by a preference for harmonicity. Aims: The current review aims to re-examine the direct evidence that may be found for a role of learning mechanisms in dissonance processing, and in doing so inform theories of dissonance perception.
    [Show full text]