1. Introduction
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
THE ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 560:49È71, 2001 October 10 V ( 2001. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved. Printed in U.S.A. THE FARTHEST KNOWN SUPERNOVA: SUPPORT FOR AN ACCELERATING UNIVERSE AND A GLIMPSE OF THE EPOCH OF DECELERATION1 ADAM G. RIESS,2 PETER E. NUGENT,3 RONALD L. GILLILAND,2 BRIAN P. SCHMIDT,4 JOHN TONRY,5 MARK DICKINSON,2 RODGER I. THOMPSON,6 TAMAS BUDAVARI,7 STEFANO CASERTANO,2 AARON S. EVANS,8 ALEXEI V. FILIPPENKO,9 MARIO LIVIO,2 DAVID B. SANDERS,5 ALICE E. SHAPLEY,10 HYRON SPINRAD,9 CHARLES C. STEIDEL,10 DANIEL STERN,11 JASON SURACE,12 AND SYLVAIN VEILLEUX13 Received 2001 March 12; accepted 2001 May 18 ABSTRACT We present photometric observations of an apparent Type Ia supernova (SN Ia) at a redshift of D1.7, the farthest SN observed to date. The supernova, SN 1997†, was discovered in a repeat observation by the Hubble Space Telescope (HST ) of the Hubble Deep Field-North (HDF-N) and serendipitously moni- tored with NICMOS on HST throughout the Thompson et al. Guaranteed-Time Observer (GTO) cam- paign. The SN type can be determined from the host galaxy type: an evolved, red elliptical lacking enough recent star formation to provide a signiÐcant population of core-collapse supernovae. The classi- Ðcation is further supported by diagnostics available from the observed colors and temporal behavior of the SN, both of which match a typical SN Ia. The photometric record of the SN includes a dozen Ñux measurements in the I, J, and H bands spanning 35 days in the observed frame. The redshift derived from the SN photometry, z \ 1.7 ^ 0.1, is in excellent agreement with the redshift estimate of \ ^ z 1.65 0.15 derived from theU300 B450 V606 I814 J110 J125 H160 H165 Ks photometry of the galaxy. Optical and near-infrared spectra of the host provide a very tentative spectroscopic redshift of 1.755. Fits to observations of the SN provide constraints for the redshift-distance relation of SNe Ia and a powerful test of the current accelerating universe hypothesis. The apparent SN brightness is consistent with that ) B ) B 2 expected in the decelerating phase of the preferred cosmological model,M 1/3, " 3. It is inconsis- tent with gray dust or simple luminosity evolution, candidate astrophysical e†ects that could mimic pre- vious evidence for an accelerating universe from SNe Ia at z B 0.5. We consider several sources of potential systematic error, including gravitational lensing, supernova misclassiÐcation, sample selection bias, and luminosity calibration errors. Currently, none of these e†ects alone appears likely to challenge our conclusions. Additional SNe Ia at z [ 1 will be required to test more exotic alternatives to the accel- erating universe hypothesis and to probe the nature of dark energy. Subject headings: cosmology: observations È supernovae: general On-line material: color Ðgure 1. INTRODUCTION 1 Based on observations with the NASA/ESA Hubble Space Telescope, obtained at the Space Telescope Science Institute, which is operated by AURA, Inc., under NASA contract NAS 5-26555. The unexpected faintness of Type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia) 2 Space Telescope Science Institute, 3700 San Martin Drive, Baltimore, at z B 0.5 provides the most direct evidence that the expan- MD 21218; ariess=stsci.edu. sion of the universe is accelerating, propelled by ““ dark 3 Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720. energy ÏÏ (Riess et al. 1998; Perlmutter et al. 1999). This 4 Mount Stromlo and Siding Spring Observatories, Private Bag, Weston Creek P.O. 2611, Australia. conclusion is supported by measurements of the character- 5 Institute for Astronomy, University of Hawaii, 2680 Woodlawn Drive, istic angular scale of Ñuctuations in the cosmic microwave Honolulu, HI 96822. background (CMB) that reveal a total energy density well in 6 Steward Observatory, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721. excess of the fraction attributed to gravitating mass (de Ber- 7 Department of Physics and Astronomy, The Johns Hopkins Uni- versity, Baltimore, MD 21218, and Department of Physics,Eotvos Uni- nardis et al. 2000; Balbi et al. 2000; Ja†e et al. 2001). versity, Budapest, Pf. 32, Hungary, H-1518. However, contaminating astrophysical e†ects can imitate 8 Department of Physics and Astronomy, State University of New York the evidence for an accelerating universe. A pervasive screen (SUNY) at Stony Brook, NY 11794-3800. of gray dust could dim SNe Ia with little telltale reddening 9 Department of Astronomy, University of California, Berkeley, CA apparent from their observed colors (Aguirre 1999a, 1999b; 94720-3411. 10 Palomar Observatory, California Institute of Technology, Mail Code Rana 1979, 1980). Although the Ðrst exploration of a distant 105-24, Pasadena, CA 91125. SN Ia at near-infrared (NIR) wavelengths provided no evi- 11 Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Mail dence of nearly gray dust, more data are needed to perform Code 169-327, Pasadena, CA 91109. a deÐnitive test (Riess et al. 2000). 12 SIRTF Science Center, California Institute of Technology, Mail Code 314-6, Pasadena, CA 91125. A more familiar challenge to the measurement of the 13 Department of Astronomy, University of Maryland, College Park, global acceleration or deceleration rate is luminosity evolu- MD 20742. tion (Sandage & Hardy 1973). The lack of a complete theo- 49 50 RIESS ET AL. Vol. 560 retical understanding of SNe Ia and an inability to identify covered an SN Ia at z \ 1.2 (SN 1999fv) as well as at least their speciÐc progenitor systems undermines our ability to one more at z B 1.05 (Tonry et al. 1999; Coil et al. 2000). predict with conÐdence the direction or degree of lumi- These data sets, while currently lacking the statistical power nosity evolution(HoÑich, Wheeler, & Thielemann 1998; to discriminate between cosmological and astrophysical Umeda et al. 1999a, 1999b; Livio 2000; Drell, Loredo, & e†ects, are growing and may provide the means to break Wasserman 2000; Pinto & Eastman 2000; Yungelson & degeneracies in the future. Livio 2000). The weight of empirical evidence appears to In early 1998, Gilliland & Phillips (1998) reported the disfavor evolution as an alternative to dark energy as the detection of two SNe, SN 1997† and SN 1997fg, in a reob- cause of the apparent faintness of SNe Ia at z B 0.5 (see servation of the Hubble Deep Field-North (HDF-N) with Riess 2000 for a review). However, the case against evolu- WFPC2 through the F814W Ðlter. The elliptical host of SN tion remains short of compelling. 1997† indicated that this supernova was ““ most probably a The extraordinary claim of the existence of dark energy SN Ia. .[at] the greatest distance reported previously for requires a high level of evidence for its acceptance. Fortu- SNe,ÏÏ but the observations at a single epoch and in a single nately, a direct and deÐnitive test is available. It should be band were insufficient to provide useful constraints on the possible to discriminate between cosmological models and SN and, hence, to perform cosmological tests (Gilliland, ““ impostors ÏÏ by tracing the redshift-distance relation to Nugent, & Phillips 1999, hereafter GNP99). redshifts greater than one. Here we report additional, serendipitous observations of SN 1997† obtained in the Guaranteed-Time Observer 1.1. T he Next Redshift Octave and the Epoch (GTO) NICMOS campaign (Thompson et al. 1999) and in of Deceleration the General Observer (GO) program 7817 (M. Dickinson et If the cosmological acceleration inferred from SNe Ia is al. 2001, in preparation), as well as spectroscopy of the host. real, it commenced rather recently, at 0.5 \ z \ 1. Beyond The combined data set provides the ability to put strong these redshifts, the universe was more compact and the constraints on the redshift and distance of this supernova attraction of matter dominated the repulsion of dark and shows it to be the highest redshift SN Ia observed (to energy. At z [ 1, the expansion of the universe should have date). These measurements further provide an opportunity been decelerating (see Filippenko & Riess 2000). The to perform a new and powerful test of the accelerating uni- observable result at z º 1 would be an apparent increased verse by probing its preceding epoch of deceleration. brightness of SNe Ia relative to what is expected for a non- In ° 2 of this paper, we describe the observations of the decelerating universe. However, if the apparent faintness of SN and its host in the HDF-N and report photometry of SNe Ia at z B 0.5 is caused by dust or simple evolution, SNe the SN from the NICMOS campaign. In ° 3, we analyze the Ia at z [ 1 should appear fainter than expected from decel- observations to constrain the SN parameters: redshift, erating cosmological models. More complex param- luminosity, age of discovery, and distance. The constraints eterizations of evolution or extinction that can match both are used to extend the distance-redshift relation of SNe Ia to the accelerating and decelerating epochs of expansion z [ 1 and to discriminate between cosmological models and would require a higher order of Ðne-tuning and are there- contaminating astrophysical e†ects. Section 4 contains a fore less plausible. discussion of the systematic uncertainties in our measure- Measuring global deceleration at z [ 1 provides addi- ments and their implications. We summarize our Ðndings tional cosmological beneÐts. To constrain the equation of in ° 5. state of dark energy (and distinguish a cosmological con- stant from the decaying scalar Ðelds described by the 2. OBSERVATIONS ““ quintessence ÏÏ hypothesis; Peebles & Ratra 1988; Cald- well,Dave, & Steinhardt 1998), it is necessary to break 2.1. T he Discovery of SN 1997† degeneracies that exist between the global densities of mass Between 1997 December 23 and December 26, Gilliland and dark energy.