DOCSLIB.ORG

Red Data Book for Guernsey

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Red Data Book for Guernsey Red Data Book for Guernsey J. Gilmour and C.T. David Guernsey Biological Records Centre 2020 1 Red Data Book for Guernsey J. Gilmour, BSc and C.T. David, PhD, BSc Guernsey Biological Records Centre 2020 Published by La Société Guernesiaise, Candie Gardens, St Peter Port, Guernsey 2020 © Guernsey Biological Records Centre, Raymond Falla House, Longue Rue, St Martin, GY1 6AF All base mapping © States of Guernsey i RED DATA BOOK FOR GUERNSEY PREFACE This book was started by the late Dr Charles David and then passed on to me, Jane Gilmour, to continue with once I joined the staff of the Guernsey Biological Records Centre (GBRC) in 2008. I wrote much of it, although it involved many discussions so it is a truly collaborative work. I stopped in 2012, when he suddenly and tragically died and I had to take on the running of the Centre. The Committee for the Environment and Infrastructure has kindly provided funding towards the completion of this document. For this I am most grateful, as this is a work that both Charles and I felt was dear to our hearts. I have updated as much information as possible to 2020, with help (see below). ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Dr Kim Gilmore, PhD for her editing, going through the book with an eagle eye and help with updating. Elizabeth Sweet, MSc for her review, as well as extensive and impressive formatting and help with updating. Jamie Hooper, BSc for his contributions on the birds. Dr Mel Broadhurst, PhD and Jessi Jennings, MSc for their comments and Dr Laura White, PhD for her contributions to the marine and intertidal sections. Chris Hurley for his review of the earlier draft of the book. The majority of photographs in this book are Charles David’s with a few of mine. We also thank to the following for their photographs: Kalerna, marsh cinquefoil; Kristian Peters, field forget-me-not; John Crellin, alternate water-milfoil; Christian Fischer, broad-leaved pondweed; Piet Spaans, male stickleback; Rob Cave, green ormer, blonde ray, small-eyed ray; Kirk Mottershead- internet, basking shark; Jeff De Longe, horned dung beetle; Wendy Bowman, Norwegian cockles. Jane Gilmour ii CONTENTS CONTENTS PREFACE ....................................................................................................................................................... II ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ................................................................................................................................... II SPECIES DESCRIPTION KEY .......................................................................................................................... XIV LATIN NAME .............................................................................................................................................. XIV ENGLISH NAME .......................................................................................................................................... XIV SHORE DOCK ............................................................................................................................................. XIV INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................................... 15 WHY IS THIS BOOK NEEDED? ........................................................................................................................................ 15 RED DATA BOOKS ....................................................................................................................................... 15 CONCEPT AND BACKGROUND........................................................................................................................................ 15 THE SIGNIFICANCE OF BIODIVERSITY ............................................................................................................................... 16 HABITATS ................................................................................................................................................... 17 WHAT IS A HABITAT? .................................................................................................................................................. 17 MICROHABITATS ........................................................................................................................................ 17 .................................................................................................................................................................. 19 SPECIES ...................................................................................................................................................... 20 EXCLUDED SPECIES ..................................................................................................................................................... 21 DATA SOURCES ........................................................................................................................................... 22 PAST LOSSES AND DECLINES ........................................................................................................................ 23 SALT MARSH.............................................................................................................................................................. 23 MARSHES ................................................................................................................................................................. 24 WETLAND ................................................................................................................................................................. 25 COASTAL .................................................................................................................................................................. 25 SIDE EFFECTS TO END OF GRAZING ................................................................................................................................. 27 AGRICULTURAL CHANGE .............................................................................................................................................. 27 UNIMPROVED DRY GRASSLAND ..................................................................................................................................... 28 FISHING .................................................................................................................................................................... 29 SAND DUNE .............................................................................................................................................................. 29 PLANTING OF NON-NATIVE SPECIES ................................................................................................................................ 30 CURRENT THREATS ..................................................................................................................................... 30 GENERAL .................................................................................................................................................................. 30 MARINE ................................................................................................................................................................... 31 PERMANENT GRASSLANDS ........................................................................................................................................... 31 THE FUTURE ............................................................................................................................................... 31 TABLE 1. AREAS OF VEGETATION TYPES IN GUERNSEY FROM IDC PHASE 1 HABITAT SURVEYS .................................................. 33 iii CONTENTS Marine .............................................................................................................................................................. 34 Beaches and cliffs ............................................................................................................................................. 34 Terrestrial ......................................................................................................................................................... 34 BIRDS AT RISK ................................................................................................................... 192 HABITAT......................................................................................................................................................36 TYPICAL PLANTS ......................................................................................................................................................... 36 TYPICAL ANIMALS ....................................................................................................................................................... 37 MANAGEMENT REQUIREMENTS ..................................................................................................................38 THREATS TO THIS HABITAT ..........................................................................................................................38 WESTERN GORSE .........................................................................................................................................39 LOUSEWORT ...............................................................................................................................................39 ORANGE BIRD’S-FOOT .................................................................................................................................39
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Impact Damage and Repair in Shells of the Limpet Patella Vulgata David Taylor
    © 2016. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd | Journal of Experimental Biology (2016) 219, 3927-3935 doi:10.1242/jeb.149880 RESEARCH ARTICLE Impact damage and repair in shells of the limpet Patella vulgata David Taylor ABSTRACT can be a major cause of lethal damage. Shanks and Wright (1986) Experiments and observations were carried out to investigate the demonstrated the destructive power of wave-borne missiles by response of the Patella vulgata limpet shell to impact. Dropped-weight setting up targets to record impacts in a given area. They studied four impact tests created damage that usually took the form of a hole in the limpet species, finding that they were much more likely to be lost in shell’s apex. Similar damage was found to occur naturally, a location where there were many movable rocks and pebbles presumably as a result of stones propelled by the sea during compared with a location consisting largely of solid rock mass. storms. Apex holes were usually fatal, but small holes were Examining the populations over a one year period, and making a sometimes repaired, and the repaired shell was as strong as the number of assumptions about size distributions and growth rates, original, undamaged shell. The impact strength (energy to failure) of they estimated that 47% of shells were destroyed in the former shells tested in situ was found to be 3.4-times higher than that of location, compared with 7% in the latter (Shanks and Wright, 1986). empty shells found on the beach. Surprisingly, strength was not Another study (Cadée, 1999) reported that impact damage by ice affected by removing the shell from its home location, or by removing blocks and stones was the major cause of damage to the limpet the limpet from the shell and allowing the shell to dry out.
    [Show full text]
  • Addenda and Amendments to a Checklist of the Lepidoptera of the British Isles on Account of Subsequently Published Data
    Ent Rec 128(2)_Layout 1 22/03/2016 12:53 Page 98 94 Entomologist’s Rec. J. Var. 128 (2016) ADDENDA AND AMENDMENTS TO A CHECKLIST OF THE LEPIDOPTERA OF THE BRITISH ISLES ON ACCOUNT OF SUBSEQUENTLY PUBLISHED DATA 1 DAVID J. L. A GASSIZ , 2 S. D. B EAVAN & 1 R. J. H ECKFORD 1 Department of Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD 2 The Hayes, Zeal Monachorum, Devon EX17 6DF This update incorpotes information published before 25 March 2016 into A Checklist of the Lepidoptera of the British Isles, 2013. CENSUS The number of species now recorded from the British Isles stands at 2535 of which 57 are thought to be extinct and in addition there are 177 adventive species. CHANGE OF STATUS (no longer extinct) p. 17 16.013 remove X, Hall (2013) p. 25 35.006 remove X, Beavan & Heckford (2014) p. 40 45.024 remove X, Wilton (2014) p. 54 49.340 remove X, Manning (2015) ADDITIONAL SPECIES in main list 12.0047 Infurcitinea teriolella (Amsel, 1954) E S W I C 15.0321 Parornix atripalpella Wahlström, 1979 E S W I C 15.0861 Phyllonorycter apparella (Herrich-Schäffer, 1855) E S W I C 15.0862 Phyllonorycter pastorella (Zeller, 1846) E S W I C 27.0021 Oegoconia novimundi (Busck, 1915) E S W I C 35.0299 Helcystogramma triannulella (Herrich-Sch äffer, 1854) E S W I C 41.0041 Blastobasis maroccanella Amsel, 1952 E S W I C 48.0071 Choreutis nemorana (Hübner, 1799) E S W I C 49.0371 Clepsis dumicolana (Zeller, 1847) E S W I C 49.2001 TETRAMOERA Diakonoff, [1968] langmaidi Plant, 2014 E S W I C 62.0151 Delplanqueia inscriptella (Duponchel, 1836) E S W I C 72.0061 Hypena lividalis (Hübner, 1790) Chevron Snout E S W I C 70.2841 PUNGELARIA Rougemont, 1903 capreolaria ([Denis & Schiffermüller], 1775) Banded Pine Carpet E S W I C 72.0211 HYPHANTRIA Harris, 1841 cunea (Drury, 1773) Autumn Webworm E S W I C 73.0041 Thysanoplusia daubei (Boisduval, 1840) Boathouse Gem E S W I C 73.0301 Aedia funesta (Esper, 1786) Druid E S W I C Ent Rec 128(2)_Layout 1 22/03/2016 12:53 Page 99 Entomologist’s Rec.
    [Show full text]
  • Glycymeris Longior (Sowerby, 1832) Clam at the Southern Edge of Its Distribution (Argentine Sea) Lucas H
    Gimenez et al. Helgol Mar Res (2020) 74:2 https://doi.org/10.1186/s10152-020-0534-x Helgoland Marine Research ORIGINAL ARTICLE Open Access Age and growth of Glycymeris longior (Sowerby, 1832) clam at the southern edge of its distribution (Argentine Sea) Lucas H. Gimenez1,2†, María del Socorro Doldan1,3,4*† , Paula C. Zaidman1,3,4 and Enrique M. Morsan1,3 Abstract Even though Glycymeris longior is a clam widely distributed in the SW Atlantic Ocean, little is known about its biology and life history. The present study assessed the periodicity of the internal growth increments of G. longior using thin shell sections. Each internal growth increment was composed of two alternating bands: a translucent band (light- coloured when viewed with transmitted light) and an opaque band (dark-coloured). Annual formation for each pair of bands was demonstrated. The formation of the annual growth increments was synchronous among individuals. Growth was determined from live clams collected at El Sótano, Argentine Sea (age range 29 to 69 years). Accord- ing to the growth model, G. longior grows fast during the frst 5 years of life and then growth= becomes slower in later years; individuals reached 50% and 90% of maximum size at 5 and 13 years of age, respectively. High variability was found in shell height for the frst 10 years: diferences up to 5–7 mm among individuals were registered for the frst 2 years of age, and up to 11 mm between the ages of 3 and 9 years. The growth performance index phi-prime (φ′) and the index of growth performance (P) of G.
    [Show full text]
  • The Chemical Ecology and Evolution of Bee–Flower Interactions: a Review and Perspectives1
    668 REVIEW / SYNTHE` SE The chemical ecology and evolution of bee–flower interactions: a review and perspectives1 S. Do¨ tterl and N.J. Vereecken Abstract: Bees and angiosperms have shared a long and intertwined evolutionary history and their interactions have re- sulted in remarkable adaptations. Yet, at a time when the ‘‘pollination crisis’’ is of major concern as natural populations of both wild and honey bees (Apis mellifera L., 1758) face alarming decline rates at a worldwide scale, there are important gaps in our understanding of the ecology and evolution of bee–flower interactions. In this review, we summarize and dis- cuss the current knowledge about the role of floral chemistry versus other communication channels in bee-pollinated flow- ering plants, both at the macro- and micro-evolutionary levels, and across the specialization–generalization gradient. The available data illustrate that floral scents and floral chemistry have been largely overlooked in bee–flower interactions, and that pollination studies integrating these components along with pollinator behaviour in a phylogenetic context will help gain considerable insights into the sensory ecology and the evolution of bees and their associated flowering plants. Re´sume´ : Les abeilles et les angiospermes partagent une grande partie de leur histoire e´volutive, et leurs interactions ont produit de remarquables exemples d’adaptations mutuelles. Cependant, a` une e´poque ou` la « crise de la pollinisation » de- vient une pre´occupation majeure et ou` les populations d’abeilles sauvages et mellife`res (Apis mellifera L., 1758) font face a` des de´clins massifs a` l’e´chelle mondiale, notre compre´hension de l’e´cologie et de l’e´volution des relations abeilles- plantes demeure fragmentaire.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes on Neotropical Proconiini (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae: Cicadellinae), IV: Lectotype Designations of Aulacizes Amyot &
    Arthropod Systematics & Phylogeny 105 64 (1) 105–111 © Museum für Tierkunde Dresden, ISSN 1863-7221, 30.10.2006 Notes on Neotropical Proconiini (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae: Cicadellinae), IV: lectotype designations of Aulacizes Amyot & Audinet-Serville species described by Germar and revalidation of A. erythrocephala (Germar, 1821) GABRIEL MEJDALANI 1, DANIELA M. TAKIYA 2 & RACHEL A. CARVALHO 1 1 Departamento de Entomologia, Museu Nacional, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Quinta da Boa Vista, São Cristóvão, 20940-040 Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil [[email protected]] 2 Center for Biodiversity, Illinois Natural History Survey, 1816 S. Oak Street, Champaign, IL 61820, USA [[email protected]] Received 17.iii.2005, accepted 22.viii.2006. Available online at www.arthropod-systematics.de > Abstract Lectotypes are designated for the sharpshooter species Aulacizes erythrocephala (Germar, 1821) and A. quadripunctata (Germar, 1821) based on recently located specimens from the Germar collection. The former species is reinstated from synonymy of the latter one and is redescribed and illustrated based on specimens from Southeastern Brazil. The male and female genitalia are described for the fi rst time. The two species are similar morphologically, but they can be easily distinguished from each other, as well as from the other species of the genus, by their color patterns. > Key words Membracoidea, Aulacizes quadripunctata, leafhopper, sharpshooter, taxonomy, morphology, Brazil. 1. Introduction This is the fourth paper of a series on the taxonomy redescribed and illustrated. One sharpshooter type of the leafhopper tribe Proconiini in the Neotropical located in the Germar collection (Homalodisca vitri- region. The fi rst three papers included descriptions of pennis (Germar, Year 1821)) was previously designated two new species and notes on other species in the tribe by TAKIYA et al.
    [Show full text]
  • LIFE 4 Pollinators Bees of the Mediterranean Hairs Are Used to Gather the Pollen Grains
    NO OR FEW HAIR FEW OR NO HAIRY ANDRENID A may be present. be may E COLITIDAE E D I GU D IEL F morphogenus more than one class per category category per class one than more morphogenus COLITIDAE n each each n I classes. several propose we categories, protection under the common agricultural policy. agricultural common the under protection or each of these these of each or F colour. tegument and hairs strategy, the pollinators initiative and biodiversity biodiversity and initiative pollinators the strategy, MEGACHILIDAE he traits you need to observe at first are size, size, are first at observe to need you traits he T legislation, including amongst others the biodiversity biodiversity the others amongst including legislation, HALICTIDAE morphogenera defined by few traits. few by defined morphogenera U policy and and policy U E of range a to contribute wil project he T regroup them in few big groups of species called called species of groups big few in them regroup the remaining high-value pollinator habitats. pollinator high-value remaining the MEGACHILIDAE ees species are not easy to identify, but we we but identify, to easy not are species ees B and ensure sustainable management and restoration of of restoration and management sustainable ensure and the level of individual species individual of level the to address the main drivers behind pollinator decline decline pollinator behind drivers main the address to recognised within 15 morpho-groups and not at at not and morpho-groups 15 within recognised obstacles to proper planning of successful programmes programmes successful of planning proper to obstacles APIDAE morphological traits only, allows the bees to be be to bees the allows only, traits morphological his knowledge gap is one of the main main the of one is gap knowledge his T diversity.
    [Show full text]
  • Succession in Ant Communities (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in Deciduous Forest Clear-Cuts – an Eastern European Case Study
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ENTOMOLOGYENTOMOLOGY ISSN (online): 1802-8829 Eur. J. Entomol. 114: 92–100, 2017 http://www.eje.cz doi: 10.14411/eje.2017.013 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Succession in ant communities (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in deciduous forest clear-cuts – an Eastern European case study IOAN TĂUŞAN 1, JENS DAUBER 2, MARIA R. TRICĂ1 and BÁLINT MARKÓ 3 1 Department of Environmental Sciences, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu; Applied Ecology Research Centre, Dr. Raţiu 5-7, 550012 Sibiu, Romania; e-mails: [email protected], [email protected] 2 Thünen Institute of Biodiversity, Federal Research Institute for Rural Areas, Forestry and Fisheries, Bundesallee 50, D-38116 Braunschweig, Germany; e-mail: [email protected] 3 Hungarian Department of Biology and Ecology, Babeş-Bolyai University, Clinicilor 5-7, 400006 Cluj-Napoca, Romania; e-mails: [email protected], [email protected] Key words. Hymenoptera, Formicidae, ants, deciduous forests, secondary succession, clear-cutting, community structure, pitfall traps Abstract. Clear-cutting, the main method of harvesting in many forests in the world, causes a series of dramatic environmental changes to the forest habitat and removes habitat resources for arboreal and epigeal species. It results in considerable changes in the composition of both plant and animal communities. Ants have many critical roles in the maintenance and functioning of forest ecosystems. Therefore, the response of ants to clear-cutting and the time it takes for an ant community to recover after clear- cutting are important indicators of the effect of this harvesting technique on the forest ecosystem. We investigated ground-dwelling ant communities during secondary succession of deciduous forests in Transylvania, Romania.
    [Show full text]
  • Os Nomes Galegos Dos Moluscos
    A Chave Os nomes galegos dos moluscos 2017 Citación recomendada / Recommended citation: A Chave (2017): Nomes galegos dos moluscos recomendados pola Chave. http://www.achave.gal/wp-content/uploads/achave_osnomesgalegosdos_moluscos.pdf 1 Notas introdutorias O que contén este documento Neste documento fornécense denominacións para as especies de moluscos galegos (e) ou europeos, e tamén para algunhas das especies exóticas máis coñecidas (xeralmente no ámbito divulgativo, por causa do seu interese científico ou económico, ou por seren moi comúns noutras áreas xeográficas). En total, achéganse nomes galegos para 534 especies de moluscos. A estrutura En primeiro lugar preséntase unha clasificación taxonómica que considera as clases, ordes, superfamilias e familias de moluscos. Aquí apúntase, de maneira xeral, os nomes dos moluscos que hai en cada familia. A seguir vén o corpo do documento, onde se indica, especie por especie, alén do nome científico, os nomes galegos e ingleses de cada molusco (nalgún caso, tamén, o nome xenérico para un grupo deles). Ao final inclúese unha listaxe de referencias bibliográficas que foron utilizadas para a elaboración do presente documento. Nalgunhas desas referencias recolléronse ou propuxéronse nomes galegos para os moluscos, quer xenéricos quer específicos. Outras referencias achegan nomes para os moluscos noutras linguas, que tamén foron tidos en conta. Alén diso, inclúense algunhas fontes básicas a respecto da metodoloxía e dos criterios terminolóxicos empregados. 2 Tratamento terminolóxico De modo moi resumido, traballouse nas seguintes liñas e cos seguintes criterios: En primeiro lugar, aprofundouse no acervo lingüístico galego. A respecto dos nomes dos moluscos, a lingua galega é riquísima e dispomos dunha chea de nomes, tanto específicos (que designan un único animal) como xenéricos (que designan varios animais parecidos).
    [Show full text]
  • The Leafhoppers of Minnesota
    Technical Bulletin 155 June 1942 The Leafhoppers of Minnesota Homoptera: Cicadellidae JOHN T. MEDLER Division of Entomology and Economic Zoology University of Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station The Leafhoppers of Minnesota Homoptera: Cicadellidae JOHN T. MEDLER Division of Entomology and Economic Zoology University of Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station Accepted for publication June 19, 1942 CONTENTS Page Introduction 3 Acknowledgments 3 Sources of material 4 Systematic treatment 4 Eurymelinae 6 Macropsinae 12 Agalliinae 22 Bythoscopinae 25 Penthimiinae 26 Gyponinae 26 Ledrinae 31 Amblycephalinae 31 Evacanthinae 37 Aphrodinae 38 Dorydiinae 40 Jassinae 43 Athysaninae 43 Balcluthinae 120 Cicadellinae 122 Literature cited 163 Plates 171 Index of plant names 190 Index of leafhopper names 190 2M-6-42 The Leafhoppers of Minnesota John T. Medler INTRODUCTION HIS bulletin attempts to present as accurate and complete a T guide to the leafhoppers of Minnesota as possible within the limits of the material available for study. It is realized that cer- tain groups could not be treated completely because of the lack of available material. Nevertheless, it is hoped that in its present form this treatise will serve as a convenient and useful manual for the systematic and economic worker concerned with the forms of the upper Mississippi Valley. In all cases a reference to the original description of the species and genus is given. Keys are included for the separation of species, genera, and supergeneric groups. In addition to the keys a brief diagnostic description of the important characters of each species is given. Extended descriptions or long lists of references have been omitted since citations to this literature are available from other sources if ac- tually needed (Van Duzee, 1917).
    [Show full text]
  • First Confirmed Record of the Ant Genus Myrmecina (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) from the Malay Peninsula: Description of a New Sp
    JHR 50: 129–140First (2016) confirmed record of the ant genusMyrmecina (Hymenoptera, Formicidae)... 129 doi: 10.3897/JHR.50.8652 RESEARCH ARTICLE http://jhr.pensoft.net First confirmed record of the ant genus Myrmecina (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) from the Malay Peninsula: description of a new species and a key to Myrmecina species from Sundaland Mark K. L. Wong1, Benoit Guénard2 1 National Parks Board, Singapore Botanic Gardens, 1 Cluny Road, Singapore 2 School of Biological Sciences, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong Corresponding author: Benoit Guénard ([email protected]) Academic editor: Michael Ohl | Received 29 March 2016 | Accepted 20 April 2016 | Published 27 June 2016 http://zoobank.org/8B72E213-BFDC-4334-AD6E-C2ED1067C231 Citation: Wong MKL, Guénard B (2016) First confirmed record of the ant genus Myrmecina (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) from the Malay Peninsula: description of a new species and a key to Myrmecina species from Sundaland. Journal of Hymenoptera Research 50: 129–140. doi: 10.3897/JHR.50.8652 Abstract We present the first confirmed record of the little known and uncommon ant genusMyrmecina for the Malay Peninsula. Myrmecina magnificenssp. n., a new species displaying unique anteriorly pointing pro- podeal spines, is described from specimens of the worker caste collected in a selectively logged primary rainforest in Singapore. We also provide the first key to Myrmecina species of the Sundaland region. Keywords Myrmecina, Southeast Asia, Malay Peninsula, Singapore, Leaf litter Copyright Mark K.L. Wong, Benoit Guénard. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
    [Show full text]
  • Linnaeus, 1758)
    Glycymeris glycymeris (Linnaeus, 1758) AphiaID: 140025 DOG COCKLE Autobranchia (Subclasse) > Pteriomorphia (Infraclasse) © Vasco Ferreira - OMARE / Jan. 21 2019 Serge Gofas, via WoRMS Facilmente confundível com: Glycymeris bimaculata . Sinónimos Arca glycymeris Linnaeus, 1758 Arca minima W. Turton, 1819 Glycymeris orbicularis da Costa, 1778 Glycymeris wagenwoorti Lacourt, 1977 Pectunculus dautzenbergi de Gregorio, 1892 Pectunculus glycymeris (Linnaeus, 1758) Pectunculus glycymeris var. bavayi Bucquoy, Dautzenberg & Dollfus, 1891 1 Pectunculus glycymeris var. globosa Jeffreys, 1869 Pectunculus glycymeris var. lineolata Dautzenberg, 1893 Pectunculus glycymeris var. obscura Bucquoy, Dautzenberg & Dollfus, 1891 Pectunculus glycymeris var. typica Monterosato, 1892 Pectunculus glycymeris var. zigzag Dautzenberg, 1893 Pectunculus marmoratus Lamarck, 1819 Pectunculus punctatus Calcara, 1840 Referências additional source Huber, M. (2010). Compendium of bivalves. A full-color guide to 3,300 of the world’s marine bivalves. A status on Bivalvia after 250 years of research. Hackenheim: ConchBooks. 901 pp., 1 CD-ROM. [details] additional source Zamouri-Langar, N.; Chouba, L.; Ajjabi Chebil, L.; Mrabet, R.; El Abed, A. (2011). Les coquillages bivalves des côtes tunisiennes. Institut National des Sciences et Technologies de la Mer: Salammbô. ISBN 978-9938-9512-0-2. 128 pp. [details] additional source Nolf F. & Swinnen F. (2013) The Glycymerididae (Mollusca: Bivalvia) of the NE Atlantic and the Mediterranean Sea. Neptunea 12(3): 1-35. [details] additional source Nolf F. & Swinnen F. (2013) The Glycymerididae (Mollusca: Bivalvia) of the NE Atlantic and the Mediterranean Sea. Neptunea 12(3): 1-35. [details] additional source Huber, M. (2010). Compendium of bivalves. A full-color guide to 3,300 of the world’s marine bivalves. A status on Bivalvia after 250 years of research.
    [Show full text]
  • Yorkhill Green Spaces Wildlife Species List
    Yorkhill Green Spaces Wildlife Species List April 2021 update Yorkhill Green Spaces Species list Draft list of animals, plants, fungi, mosses and lichens recorded from Yorkhill, Glasgow. Main sites: Yorkhill Park, Overnewton Park and Kelvinhaugh Park (AKA Cherry Park). Other recorded sites: bank of River Kelvin at Bunhouse Rd/ Old Dumbarton Rd, Clyde Expressway path, casual records from streets and gardens in Yorkhill. Species total: 711 Vertebrates: Amhibians:1, Birds: 57, Fish: 7, Mammals (wild): 15 Invertebrates: Amphipods: 1, Ants: 3, Bees: 26, Beetles: 21, Butterflies: 11, Caddisflies: 2, Centipedes: 3, Earthworms: 2, Earwig: 1, Flatworms: 1, Flies: 61, Grasshoppers: 1, Harvestmen: 2, Lacewings: 2, Mayflies: 2, Mites: 4, Millipedes: 3, Moths: 149, True bugs: 13, Slugs & snails: 21, Spiders: 14, Springtails: 2, Wasps: 13, Woodlice: 5 Plants: Flowering plants: 174, Ferns: 5, Grasses: 13, Horsetail: 1, Liverworts: 7, Mosses:17, Trees: 19 Fungi and lichens: Fungi: 24, Lichens: 10 Conservation Status: NameSBL - Scottish Biodiversity List Priority Species Birds of Conservation Concern - Red List, Amber List Last Common name Species Taxon Record Common toad Bufo bufo amphiban 2012 Australian landhopper Arcitalitrus dorrieni amphipod 2021 Black garden ant Lasius niger ant 2020 Red ant Myrmica rubra ant 2021 Red ant Myrmica ruginodis ant 2014 Buff-tailed bumblebee Bombus terrestris bee 2021 Garden bumblebee Bombus hortorum bee 2020 Tree bumblebee Bombus hypnorum bee 2021 Heath bumblebee Bombus jonellus bee 2020 Red-tailed bumblebee Bombus
    [Show full text]