The SHOREBIRDS

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The SHOREBIRDS Len’s Lens – Volume 2 SHOREBIRDS In memory of Rich Stallcup 1944 - 2012 “Damn the winds, let’s go birding…” Copyright Len Blumin – March 2018 Front cover: Marbled Godwit – May – Bodega Bay, CA 2 Len’s Lens – Volume 2 The SHOREBIRDS Shorebirds are a group of specialized bird families that seen mostly along our coasts and at interior wetlands. A few have evolved to forage in upland areas. They number 210+ species worldwide, with about 50 species breeding regularly in North America (O’Brien, et. al., 2006). Current taxonomic schemes place shorebird families in the order Charadriiformes, along with the Gulls, Terns, and Auks (Alcids). Shorebirds families featured here are birds photographed on trips during the past 18 years: Recurvirostridae – Stilts and Avocets 6-9 Haematopodidae – Oystercatchers 10-13 Charadriidae – Plovers and Lapwings 14-27 Jacanidae – Jacanas 28 Scolopacidae – Sandpipers 29-60 3 Species Index Stilts and Avocets Sandpipers, Phalaropes and Allies – (continued) Black-necked Stilt 6-7 Red Knot 36 American Avocet 8-9 Surfbird 37 Ruff 38 Oystercatchers Sharp-tailed Sandpiper 39 Black Oystercatcher 10-11 Stilt Sandpiper 40 American Oystercatcher 12-13 Sanderling 41 Dunlin 42 Plovers and Lapwings Rock Sandpiper 43 Black-bellied Plover 14-15 Baird’s Sandpiper 44 American Golden-Plover 16 Least Sandpiper 45 Pacific Golden-Plover 17 Pectoral Sandpiper 46 Killdeer 18-19 Semipalmated Sandpiper 47 Wilson’s Plover 20-21 Western Sandpiper 48 Semipalmated Plover 22-23 Piping Plover 24 Short-billed Dowitcher 49 Snowy Plover 25 Long-billed Dowitcher 50 Mountain Plover 26 Southern Lapwing 27 Wilson’s Snipe 51 Jacanas Spotted Sandpiper 52 Northern Jacana 28 Solitary Sandpiper 53 Wandering Tattler 54 Sandpipers, Phalaropes and Allies Greater Yellowlegs 55 Upland Sandpiper 29 Lesser Yellowlegs 56 Whimbrel 30 Willet 57 Long-billed Curlew 31 Wilson’s Phalarope 58 Hudsonian Godwit 32 Red-necked Phalarope 59 Marbled Godwit 33 Red Phalarope 60 Black Turnstone 34 Ruddy Turnstone 35 (and back cover) (See p. 61 for Acknowledgements/References) 4 Photography and technical notes All photos were taken by the author, using an adapter to mount a small digital camera closely to the eyepiece of a Swarovski HD spotting telescope, a technique called “digi-scoping”. Over the years a number of cameras were used, starting with a Nikon twist-body CoolPix (CP) 4500, and progressing to the CP 8400, and the CP 6000. The newer Nikon 1 series cameras offered a larger sensor. The Nikon 1 V1 with the Nikkor 18.5mm lens has been a mainstay for the past 4-5 years. The quality of the scope is more important than the camera, and a steady tripod helps a lot. Taking photos through a spotting scope allows one to photograph birds from a distance, which in turn permits observing them with minimal disturbance. For producing the current volume the digital photos were reduced in size to 1 MB JPEGs, then imported to an MS Word document landscape template from the publisher (MagCloud). The final “book” file was saved as a PDF, in a size that allowed uploading to MagCloud for printing or viewing. A reduced PDF file of the book is then made available to send with an email or to view with a computer or portable device. Species are presented roughly in the order used by the American Ornithological Society (AOS), formed in 2016 by a merger of the American Ornithologists’ Union (AOU) and the Cooper Ornithological Society (COS). Favorite sites for shorebird photography included California’s coast and wetlands (many), Florida’s Gulf Coast, Texas’ Gulf Coast, and Connecticut’s shores, plus a few from Mexico, Trinidad and Tobago, and Costa Rica. Some “soft” photos are included. It seemed better to have a record shot than none at all. And of course there are numbers of shorebird species the author has yet to photograph. 5 Black-necked Stilt – Himantopus mexicanus (Left) – A male Black-necked Stilt rests in a field of Brass Button flowers on an island. The male stilt is jet black above, while the female is brown- black on her upperparts. There is little seasonal change in the plumage. Shorebird Marsh, Corte Madera, CA, May. (Right) – An adult Black-necked Stilt stays close to a brown-backed juvenile as they forage. The coverts and scapulars show faint buffy margins. The pink color on the legs deepens with age. Bothin Marsh, Mill Valley, CA, January. 6 Black-necked Stilt – Himantopus mexicanus (Above) - The young stilt has paler pink legs, a gray neck and gray-brown back. Shorebird Marsh, Corte Madera, CA, November. (Above) – Foraging adult Black-necked Stilt. The dark red iris is difficult to photograph. Shorebird Marsh, Corte Madera, CA, November. (Left) – Juvenile stilt, sitting on its ankles. Note the fringes on the scapulars and coverts. Shollenberger Park, (Right) – A female Petaluma, CA, July. stilt with her spotted egg. Shollenberger Park, Petaluma, CA, May, 7 American Avocet – Recurvirostra americana Breeding plumage avocets. Female on the left has a more sharply upcurved bill. Las Gallinas ponds, San Rafael, CA, April 8 American Avocet – Recurvirostra americana (Above) – Adult male in winter (basic) plumage. They forage in bays and are quite tolerant of saline waters, even hypersaline sites such as Mono Lake, CA and Great Salt Lake, UT. Shorebird Marsh, Corte Madera, CA, December. (Above) – Adult American Avocet in breeding plumage. The long legs with partially webbed toes (Above) – A days-old avocet is able to forage for help when foraging in muddy substrates. itself. Shollenberger Park, Petaluma, CA, July. Shollenberger Park, Petaluma, CA, June. 9 Black Oystercatcher – Haematopus bachmani (Right) – A pair of Black Oystercatchers rest just above the high tide line. Note the laterally compressed bills that allow them open mussels that are found on rocky outcrops, such as here just below the viewing area at Bodega Head, Bodega Bay, CA, October. Despite the name, they rarely eat oysters. (Above) – Oystercatcher pair on the rocky shore of Strawberry Point, Mill Valley, CA, November. The female is on the left, as explained below. (Right) – The female’s pupil usually looks out of round, due to the presence of a black fleck on the yellow iris at the 7:30 o’clock position. A smaller fleck may be seen there in some males. (See page 61, Guzzetti, 2008.)k (Left) – The male’s pupil usually looks rounder than the female’s. 10 Black Oystercatcher – Haematopus bachmani (Right) – The adult oystercatcher has pried a limpet from an intertidal rock using its flattened bill as a chisel. Their diet consists main of limpets and mussels, plus the occasion worm. Spud Point Marina, Bodega Bay Harbor, CA, March. (Below) – The red color of the bill develops gradually over the first 2-3 years. The distal half of the bill on this subadult is still gray. Porto Bodega, Bodega Bay Harbor, CA, May. 11 American Oystercatcher – Haematopus palliatus The American Oystercatcher has white underparts, easily distinguishing it from the west coast Black Oystercatcher. Bird pictured above is a female, as judged by the prominent black fleck at the 7:30 position on the yellow iris. Fred Howard, Park Tarpon Springs, FL, February. 12 American Oystercatcher – Haematopus palliatus Adult male American Oystercatcher (round pupil). North Beach, Fort De Soto Park, FL, February. 13 Black-bellied Plover – Pluvialis squatarola The black-bellied is the largest of the Pluvialis plovers. Note the robust build and heavy bill. The breeding male (above) is blacker than the female. Soon they’ll head north to breed in the tundra. Seen here at North Beach, Fort De Soto Park, St. Petersburg, FL, late April. 14 Black-bellied Plover – Pluvialis squatarola (Left) - Typical winter plumage, with muted shades of gray. Common on the West Coast. Plovers are sight feeders, with large eyes to spot a variety of invertebrate prey. San Leandro Marina, San Leandro, CA, December. (Right) - In April we see the appearance of some black on the face and belly, transitioning into breeding plumage. Rollover Pass, Bolivar Peninsula, TX, April. 15 American Golden-Plover – Pluvialis dominica (Left) – American Golden-Plover in a muddy field near the entrance to Anahuac National Wildlife Refuge, TX, April. Note the long wingtips and the prominent white supercillium. (Right) – Long wings extend beyond tail, here showing the tips of 4 primary feathers. (Right) – During migration the American Golden-Plovers feed on a variety of invertebrate prey. A mowed lawn makes it easy for them to find insects and worms. The face and belly are in transition to the jet black of breeding plumage. They are less shy in public areas like here at Fort Travis Park, Bolivar Point, TX, near the entrance to Galveston Bay. April. 16 Pacific Golden-Plover – Pluvialis fulva (Left) – Pacific Golden-Plover in February, resting on the shoreline of a diked pond at Shollenberger Park, Petaluma, CA. The bill is intermediate in thickness and length between those of the Black-bellied and American Golden-Plovers. To me they are the most golden of the golden-plovers. (Right) –Small numbers of these bright golden-plovers winter in the San Francisco Bay area, usually in the company of Black- bellied Plovers. The wings are not quite as long as those of the American Golden-Plover, and fewer black primaries project past the tertials. Shollenberger Park. Petaluma, CA, February. 17 Killdeer – Charadrius vociferus (Left) – Juvenile Killdeer. Las Gallinas, San Rafael, CA, June. The upperpart feathers have neat buffy edges. Killdeers earned the “vociferus” part of their name by their frequent piercing flight calls. (Right) – Killdeers are seen throughout the U.S., both near water and in open fields or lawns. The flame orange eyering glows when the angle of the sun is just right. The Killdeer is the largest of our Charadrius plovers.
Recommended publications
  • Field Identification of Smaller Sandpipers Within the Genus <I
    Field identification of smaller sandpipers within the genus C/dr/s Richard R. Veit and Lars Jonsson Paintings and line drawings by Lars Jonsson INTRODUCTION the hand, we recommend that the reader threeNearctic species, the Semipalmated refer to the speciesaccounts of Prateret Sandpiper (C. pusilia), the Western HESMALL Calidris sandpipers, affec- al. (1977) or Cramp and Simmons Sandpiper(C. mauri) andthe LeastSand- tionatelyreferred to as "peeps" in (1983). Our conclusionsin this paperare piper (C. minutilla), and four Palearctic North America, and as "stints" in Britain, basedupon our own extensivefield expe- species,the primarilywestern Little Stint haveprovided notoriously thorny identi- rience,which, betweenus, includesfirst- (C. minuta), the easternRufous-necked ficationproblems for many years. The hand familiarity with all sevenspecies. Stint (C. ruficollis), the eastern Long- first comprehensiveefforts to elucidate We also examined specimensin the toed Stint (C. subminuta)and the wide- thepicture were two paperspublished in AmericanMuseum of Natural History, spread Temminck's Stint (C. tem- Brtttsh Birds (Wallace 1974, 1979) in Museumof ComparativeZoology, Los minckii).Four of thesespecies, pusilla, whichthe problem was approached from Angeles County Museum, San Diego mauri, minuta and ruficollis, breed on the Britishperspective of distinguishing Natural History Museum, Louisiana arctictundra and are found during migra- vagrant Nearctic or eastern Palearctic State UniversityMuseum of Zoology, tion in flocksof up to thousandsof
    [Show full text]
  • To View the Apr/May Issue of the Sandpiper (Pdf)
    The andpiper APRIL/MAY 2018 Redwood Region Audubon Society www.rras.org S APRIL/MAY FIELD TRIPS Every Saturday: Arcata Marsh and Wildlife Sanctuary. Sunday, April 8: Humboldt Bay National Wildlife carpooling available. Walks generally run 2-3 hours. All These are our famous, rain-or-shine, docent-led fi eld trips at Refuge. This is a wonderful 2-to 3-hour trip for people ages, abilities and interest levels welcome! For more the Marsh. Bring your binocular(s) and have a great morning wanting to learn the birds of the Humboldt Bay area. It information, please contact Melissa Dougherty at 530-859- birding! Meet in the parking lot at the end of South I Street takes a leisurely pace with emphasis on enjoying the birds! 1874 or email [email protected]. (Klopp Lake) in Arcata at 8:30 a.m. Trips end around 11 a.m. Beginners are more than welcome. Meet at the Refuge Walks led by: Cédric Duhalde (Apr 7); Cindy Moyer (Apr Visitor Center at 9 a.m. Call Jude Power (707-822- 3613) Saturday, April 14: Shorebird Workshop, Part 14); Michael Morris (Apr 21); Christine Keil (Apr 28). If you for more information. III at Del Norte Pier. Meet at 10 a.m. to watch the are interested in leading a Marsh walk, please contact Ken rising tide at the foot of W. Del Norte St. bring in waves Burton at [email protected]. Sunday, April 8: Shorebird Workshop, Part II of godwits, willets, turnstones, and curlews. Tide will turn at South Spit. First we’ll look for beach-loving around noon; we hope to see a good show by then.
    [Show full text]
  • Arcata Marsh & Wildlife Sanctuary Bird Checklist
    Arcata Marsh & Wildlife Sanctuary Bird Checklist Arcata, Humboldt County, California (Updated Fall 2014) The following list of 327 species was updated by Rob Fowler and David Fix in 2014 from the list they compiled in 2009. Data came from sightings entered in eBird; Stanley Harris's Northwest California Bird (2005, 1996, 1991); historical records in North American Birds magazine and its supporting unpublished Humboldt County summaries; the 2006 edition Arcata Marsh bird checklist (Elias Elias); the 1995 edition Arcata Marsh bird checklist (Kristina Van Wert); and personal communications with many birders. Formatting by Camden Bruner. Call the Northwest California Bird Alert at (707) 822-5666 to report or hear reports of rare birds! Abbreviations: A - Abundant; occurs in large numbers C - Common; likely to be found U - Uncommon; occurs in small numbers, found with seearching R - Rare; expected in very small numbers, not likely to be found Ca - Casual; several records, possibly may occur regularly Ac - Accidental; 1-3 records, not reasonably expected to occur Sp - Spring (Marsh - May) S - Summer (June to mid-July) F - Fall (mid-July through November) W - Winter (December through February) Here Waterfowl: Breeds Spring Summer Fall Winter _____ Greater White-fronted Goose R R R _____ Emperor Goose Ac _____ Snow Goose Ca Ca Ca _____ Ross's Goose Ca Ca Ca _____ Brant U Ac U R _____ Cackling Goose A U C _____ Canada Goose C C C C yes _____ Tundra Swan Ca Ca _____ Wood Duck U U U U yes _____ Gadwall C C C C yes _____ Eurasian Wigeon R U R _____
    [Show full text]
  • Birdlife International for the Input of Analyses, Technical Information, Advice, Ideas, Research Papers, Peer Review and Comment
    UNEP/CMS/ScC16/Doc.10 Annex 2b CMS Scientific Council: Flyway Working Group Reviews Review 2: Review of Current Knowledge of Bird Flyways, Principal Knowledge Gaps and Conservation Priorities Compiled by: JEFF KIRBY Just Ecology Brookend House, Old Brookend, Berkeley, Gloucestershire, GL13 9SQ, U.K. June 2010 Acknowledgements I am grateful to colleagues at BirdLife International for the input of analyses, technical information, advice, ideas, research papers, peer review and comment. Thus, I extend my gratitude to my lead contact at the BirdLife Secretariat, Ali Stattersfield, and to Tris Allinson, Jonathan Barnard, Stuart Butchart, John Croxall, Mike Evans, Lincoln Fishpool, Richard Grimmett, Vicky Jones and Ian May. In addition, John Sherwell worked enthusiastically and efficiently to provide many key publications, at short notice, and I’m grateful to him for that. I also thank the authors of, and contributors to, Kirby et al. (2008) which was a major review of the status of migratory bird species and which laid the foundations for this work. Borja Heredia, from CMS, and Taej Mundkur, from Wetlands International, also provided much helpful advice and assistance, and were instrumental in steering the work. I wish to thank Tim Jones as well (the compiler of a parallel review of CMS instruments) for his advice, comment and technical inputs; and also Simon Delany of Wetlands International. Various members of the CMS Flyway Working Group, and other representatives from CMS, BirdLife and Wetlands International networks, responded to requests for advice and comment and for this I wish to thank: Olivier Biber, Joost Brouwer, Nicola Crockford, Carlo C. Custodio, Tim Dodman, Roger Jaensch, Jelena Kralj, Angus Middleton, Narelle Montgomery, Cristina Morales, Paul Kariuki Ndang'ang'a, Paul O’Neill, Herb Raffaele and David Stroud.
    [Show full text]
  • Web-Book Catalog 2021-05-10
    Lehigh Gap Nature Center Library Book Catalog Title Year Author(s) Publisher Keywords Keywords Catalog No. National Geographic, Washington, 100 best pictures. 2001 National Geogrpahic. Photographs. 779 DC Miller, Jeffrey C., and Daniel H. 100 butterflies and moths : portraits from Belknap Press of Harvard University Butterflies - Costa 2007 Janzen, and Winifred Moths - Costa Rica 595.789097286 th tropical forests of Costa Rica Press, Cambridge, MA rica Hallwachs. Miller, Jeffery C., and Daniel H. 100 caterpillars : portraits from the Belknap Press of Harvard University Caterpillars - Costa 2006 Janzen, and Winifred 595.781 tropical forests of Costa Rica Press, Cambridge, MA Rica Hallwachs 100 plants to feed the bees : provide a 2016 Lee-Mader, Eric, et al. Storey Publishing, North Adams, MA Bees. Pollination 635.9676 healthy habitat to help pollinators thrive Klots, Alexander B., and Elsie 1001 answers to questions about insects 1961 Grosset & Dunlap, New York, NY Insects 595.7 B. Klots Cruickshank, Allan D., and Dodd, Mead, and Company, New 1001 questions answered about birds 1958 Birds 598 Helen Cruickshank York, NY Currie, Philip J. and Eva B. 101 Questions About Dinosaurs 1996 Dover Publications, Inc., Mineola, NY Reptiles Dinosaurs 567.91 Koppelhus Dover Publications, Inc., Mineola, N. 101 Questions About the Seashore 1997 Barlowe, Sy Seashore 577.51 Y. Gardening to attract 101 ways to help birds 2006 Erickson, Laura. Stackpole Books, Mechanicsburg, PA Birds - Conservation. 639.978 birds. Sharpe, Grant, and Wenonah University of Wisconsin Press, 101 wildflowers of Arcadia National Park 1963 581.769909741 Sharpe Madison, WI 1300 real and fanciful animals : from Animals, Mythical in 1998 Merian, Matthaus Dover Publications, Mineola, NY Animals in art 769.432 seventeenth-century engravings.
    [Show full text]
  • A Case of the Population Trend of Far Eastern Curlew Numenius Madagascariensis in Banyuasin Peninsula, South Sumatra, Indonesia
    Ecologica Montenegrina 44: 11-18 (2021) This journal is available online at: www.biotaxa.org/em http://dx.doi.org/10.37828/em.2021.44.2 Is the global decline reflects local declines? A case of the population trend of Far Eastern Curlew Numenius madagascariensis in Banyuasin Peninsula, South Sumatra, Indonesia MUHAMMAD IQBAL1*, CIPTO DWI HANDONO2, DENI MULYANA3, ARUM SETIAWAN4, ZAZILI HANAFIAH4, HENNI MARTINI5, SARNO4, INDRA YUSTIAN4 & HILDA ZULKIFLI4 1Biology Program, Faculty of Science, Sriwijaya University, Jalan Padang Selasa 524, Palembang, South Sumatra 30139, Indonesia. 2Yayasan Ekologi Satwa Liar Indonesia (EKSAI), Jalan Kutisari 1 No. 19, Surabaya, East Java 60291, Indonesia 3Berbak Sembilang National Park, South Sumatra office, Jalan Tanjung Api-api komplek Imadinatuna No. 114, South Sumatra, Indonesia 4Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Sriwijaya University, Jalan Raya Palembang-Prabumulih km 32, Indralaya, South Sumatra, Indonesia. 5Hutan Kita Institute (HAKI), Jalan Yudo No. 9H, Palembang, South Sumatra 30126, Indonesia *Corresponding author: [email protected] Received 28 June 2021 │ Accepted by V. Pešić: 13 July 2021 │ Published online 16 July 2021. Abstract Far Eastern Curlew Numenius madagascariensis (Linnaeus, 1766) is Endangered species confined in East Asian Australasian Flyway (EAAF) sites. We compiled and summarized all historical numbers of Far Eastern Curlew in Banyuasin Peninsula, South Sumatra, Indonesia. A total of 30 records were documented from 1984 to 2020. The largest number is 2,620 individuals during the migration period in 1988. Unfortunately, the largest number drop to 1,750 individuals in wintering period in 2008, and then drop to 850 individuals in 2019. The numbers indicate that the population decline by up to 62% in the last 35 years (1984 to 2019).
    [Show full text]
  • Population Analysis and Community Workshop for Far Eastern Curlew Conservation Action in Pantai Cemara, Desa Sungai Cemara – Jambi
    POPULATION ANALYSIS AND COMMUNITY WORKSHOP FOR FAR EASTERN CURLEW CONSERVATION ACTION IN PANTAI CEMARA, DESA SUNGAI CEMARA – JAMBI Final Report Small Grant Fund of the EAAFP Far Eastern Curlew Task Force Iwan Febrianto, Cipto Dwi Handono & Ragil S. Rihadini Jambi, Indonesia 2019 The aim of this project are to Identify the condition of Far Eastern Curlew Population and the remaining potential sites for Far Eastern Curlew stopover in Sumatera, Indonesia and protect the remaining stopover sites for Far Eastern Curlew by educating the government, local people and community around the sites as the effort of reducing the threat of habitat degradation, habitat loss and human disturbance at stopover area. INTRODUCTION The Far Eastern Curlew (Numenius madagascariencis) is the largest shorebird in the world and is endemic to East Asian – Australian Flyway. It is one of the Endangered migratory shorebird with estimated global population at 38.000 individual, although a more recent update now estimates the population at 32.000 (Wetland International, 2015 in BirdLife International, 2017). An analysis of monitoring data collected from around Australia and New Zealand (Studds et al. in prep. In BirdLife International, 2017) suggests that the species has declined much more rapidly than was previously thought; with an annual rate of decline of 0.058 equating to a loss of 81.7% over three generations. Habitat loss occuring as a result of development is the most significant threat currently affecting migratory shorebird along the EAAF (Melville et al. 2016 in EAAFP 2017). Loss of habitat at critical stopover sites in the Yellow Sea is suspected to be the key threat to this species and given that it is restricted to East Asian - Australasian Flyway, the declines in the non-breeding are to be representative of the global population.
    [Show full text]
  • Hudsonian Godwit (Limosa Haemastica) at Orielton Lagoon, Tasmania, 09/03/2018
    Hudsonian Godwit (Limosa haemastica) at Orielton Lagoon, Tasmania, 09/03/2018 Peter Vaughan and Andrea Magnusson E: T: Introduction: This submission pertains to the observation and identification of a single Hudsonian Godwit (Limosa haemastica) at Orielton Lagoon, Tasmania, on the afternoon of the 9th of March 2018. The bird was observed in the company of 50 Bar-tailed Godwits (Limosa lapponica) and a single Black-tailed Godwit (Limosa limosa), and both comparative and diagnostic features were used to differentiate it from these species. Owing to the recognised difficulties in differentiating similar species of wading birds, this submission makes a detailed analysis of the features used to identify the godwit in question. If accepted, this sighting would represent the eighth confirmed record of this species in Australia, and the second record of this species in Tasmania. Sighting and Circumstances: The godwit in question was observed on the western side of Orielton Lagoon in Tasmania, at approximately 543440 E 5262330 N, GDA 94, 55G. This location is comprised of open tidal mudflats abutted by Sarcicornia sp. saltmarsh, and is a well- documented roosting and feeding site for Bar-tailed Godwits and several other species of wading bird. This has included, for the past three migration seasons, a single Black-tailed Godwit (extralimital at this location) associating with the Bar-tailed Godwit flock. The Hudsonian Godwit was observed for approximately 37 minutes, between approximately 16:12 and 16:49, although the mixed flock of Bar-tailed Godwits and Black-tailed Godwits was observed for 55 minutes prior to this time. The weather during observation was clear skies (1/8 cloud cover), with a light north- easterly breeze and relatively warm temperatures (wind speed nor exact temperature recorded).
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Version Target Shorebird Species List
    Draft Version Target Shorebird Species List The target species list (species to be surveyed) should not change over the course of the study, therefore determining the target species list is an important project design task. Because waterbirds, including shorebirds, can occur in very high numbers in a census area, it is often not possible to count all species without compromising the quality of the survey data. For the basic shorebird census program (protocol 1), we recommend counting all shorebirds (sub-Order Charadrii), all raptors (hawks, falcons, owls, etc.), Common Ravens, and American Crows. This list of species is available on our field data forms, which can be downloaded from this site, and as a drop-down list on our online data entry form. If a very rare species occurs on a shorebird area survey, the species will need to be submitted with good documentation as a narrative note with the survey data. Project goals that could preclude counting all species include surveys designed to search for color-marked birds or post- breeding season counts of age-classed bird to obtain age ratios for a species. When conducting a census, you should identify as many of the shorebirds as possible to species; sometimes, however, this is not possible. For example, dowitchers often cannot be separated under censuses conditions, and at a distance or under poor lighting, it may not be possible to distinguish some species such as small Calidris sandpipers. We have provided codes for species combinations that commonly are reported on censuses. Combined codes are still species-specific and you should use the code that provides as much information as possible about the potential species combination you designate.
    [Show full text]
  • The All-Bird Bulletin
    Advancing Integrated Bird Conservation in North America Spring 2014 Inside this issue: The All-Bird Bulletin Protecting Habitat for 4 the Buff-breasted Sandpiper in Bolivia The Neotropical Migratory Bird Conservation Conserving the “Jewels 6 Act (NMBCA): Thirteen Years of Hemispheric in the Crown” for Neotropical Migrants Bird Conservation Guy Foulks, Program Coordinator, Division of Bird Habitat Conservation, U.S. Fish and Bird Conservation in 8 Wildlife Service (USFWS) Costa Rica’s Agricultural Matrix In 2000, responding to alarming declines in many Neotropical migratory bird popu- Uruguayan Rice Fields 10 lations due to habitat loss and degradation, Congress passed the Neotropical Migra- as Wintering Habitat for tory Bird Conservation Act (NMBCA). The legislation created a unique funding Neotropical Shorebirds source to foster the cooperative conservation needed to sustain these species through all stages of their life cycles, which occur throughout the Western Hemi- Conserving Antigua’s 12 sphere. Since its first year of appropriations in 2002, the NMBCA has become in- Most Critical Bird strumental to migratory bird conservation Habitat in the Americas. Neotropical Migratory 14 Bird Conservation in the The mission of the North American Bird Heart of South America Conservation Initiative is to ensure that populations and habitats of North Ameri- Aros/Yaqui River Habi- 16 ca's birds are protected, restored, and en- tat Conservation hanced through coordinated efforts at in- ternational, national, regional, and local Strategic Conservation 18 levels, guided by sound science and effec- in the Appalachians of tive management. The NMBCA’s mission Southern Quebec is to achieve just this for over 380 Neo- tropical migratory bird species by provid- ...and more! Cerulean Warbler, a Neotropical migrant, is a ing conservation support within and be- USFWS Bird of Conservation Concern and listed as yond North America—to Latin America Vulnerable on the International Union for Conser- Coordination and editorial vation of Nature (IUCN) Red List.
    [Show full text]
  • Wildlife Habitat Plan
    WILDLIFE HABITAT PLAN City of Novi, Michigan A QUALITY OF LIFE FOR THE 21ST CENTURY WILDLIFE HABITAT PLAN City of Novi, Michigan A QUALIlY OF LIFE FOR THE 21ST CENTURY JUNE 1993 Prepared By: Wildlife Management Services Brandon M. Rogers and Associates, P.C. JCK & Associates, Inc. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS City Council Matthew C. Ouinn, Mayor Hugh C. Crawford, Mayor ProTem Nancy C. Cassis Carol A. Mason Tim Pope Robert D. Schmid Joseph G. Toth Planning Commission Kathleen S. McLallen, * Chairman John P. Balagna, Vice Chairman lodia Richards, Secretary Richard J. Clark Glen Bonaventura Laura J. lorenzo* Robert Mitzel* Timothy Gilberg Robert Taub City Manager Edward F. Kriewall Director of Planning and Community Development James R. Wahl Planning Consultant Team Wildlife Management Services - 640 Starkweather Plymouth, MI. 48170 Kevin Clark, Urban Wildlife Specialist Adrienne Kral, Wildlife Biologist Ashley long, Field Research Assistant Brandon M. Rogers and Associates, P.C. - 20490 Harper Ave. Harper Woods, MI. 48225 Unda C. lemke, RlA, ASLA JCK & Associates, Inc. - 45650 Grand River Ave. Novi, MI. 48374 Susan Tepatti, Water Resources Specialist * Participated with the Planning Consultant Team in developing the study. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS iii PREFACE vii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY viii FRAGMENTATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES " ., , 1 Consequences ............................................ .. 1 Effects Of Forest Fragmentation 2 Edges 2 Reduction of habitat 2 SPECIES SAMPLING TECHNIQUES ................................ .. 3 Methodology 3 Survey Targets ............................................ ., 6 Ranking System ., , 7 Core Reserves . .. 7 Wildlife Movement Corridor .............................. .. 9 FIELD SURVEY RESULTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS , 9 Analysis Results ................................ .. 9 Core Reserves . .. 9 Findings and Recommendations , 9 WALLED LAKE CORE RESERVE - DETAILED STUDy.... .. .... .. .... .. 19 Results and Recommendations ............................... .. 21 GUIDELINES TO ECOLOGICAL LANDSCAPE PLANNING AND WILDLIFE CONSERVATION.
    [Show full text]
  • Biogeographical Profiles of Shorebird Migration in Midcontinental North America
    U.S. Geological Survey Biological Resources Division Technical Report Series Information and Biological Science Reports ISSN 1081-292X Technology Reports ISSN 1081-2911 Papers published in this series record the significant find­ These reports are intended for the publication of book­ ings resulting from USGS/BRD-sponsored and cospon­ length-monographs; synthesis documents; compilations sored research programs. They may include extensive data of conference and workshop papers; important planning or theoretical analyses. These papers are the in-house coun­ and reference materials such as strategic plans, standard terpart to peer-reviewed journal articles, but with less strin­ operating procedures, protocols, handbooks, and manu­ gent restrictions on length, tables, or raw data, for example. als; and data compilations such as tables and bibliogra­ We encourage authors to publish their fmdings in the most phies. Papers in this series are held to the same peer-review appropriate journal possible. However, the Biological Sci­ and high quality standards as their journal counterparts. ence Reports represent an outlet in which BRD authors may publish papers that are difficult to publish elsewhere due to the formatting and length restrictions of journals. At the same time, papers in this series are held to the same peer-review and high quality standards as their journal counterparts. To purchase this report, contact the National Technical Information Service, 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, VA 22161 (call toll free 1-800-553-684 7), or the Defense Technical Infonnation Center, 8725 Kingman Rd., Suite 0944, Fort Belvoir, VA 22060-6218. Biogeographical files o Shorebird Migration · Midcontinental Biological Science USGS/BRD/BSR--2000-0003 December 1 By Susan K.
    [Show full text]