DOCSLIB.ORG

Explicit Feedback Within Game-Based Training: Examining the Influence of Source Modality Effects on Interaction

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Explicit Feedback Within Game-Based Training: Examining the Influence of Source Modality Effects on Interaction University of Central Florida STARS Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019 2013 Explicit Feedback Within Game-based Training: Examining The Influence Of Source Modality Effects On Interaction Benjamin Goldberg University of Central Florida Part of the Psychology Commons Find similar works at: https://stars.library.ucf.edu/etd University of Central Florida Libraries http://library.ucf.edu This Doctoral Dissertation (Open Access) is brought to you for free and open access by STARS. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019 by an authorized administrator of STARS. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STARS Citation Goldberg, Benjamin, "Explicit Feedback Within Game-based Training: Examining The Influence Of Source Modality Effects On Interaction" (2013). Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019. 2631. https://stars.library.ucf.edu/etd/2631 EXPLICIT FEEDBACK WITHIN GAME-BASED TRAINING: EXAMINING THE INFLUENCE OF SOURCE MODALITY EFFECTS ON INTERACTION by BENJAMIN S. GOLDBERG B.A. University of Florida, 2005 M.S. University of Central Florida, 2010 A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Modeling and Simulation in the College of Sciences at the University of Central Florida Orlando, Florida Summer Term 2013 Major Professors: Jan Cannon-Bowers & Clint Bowers © 2013 Benjamin S. Goldberg ii ABSTRACT This research aims to enhance Simulation-Based Training (SBT) applications to support training events in the absence of live instruction. The overarching purpose is to explore available tools for integrating intelligent tutoring communications in game-based learning platforms and to examine theory-based techniques for delivering explicit feedback in such environments. The primary tool influencing the design of this research was the Generalized Intelligent Framework for Tutoring (GIFT), a modular domain-independent architecture that provides the tools and methods to author, deliver, and evaluate intelligent tutoring technologies within any training platform. Influenced by research surrounding Social Cognitive Theory and Cognitive Load Theory, the resulting experiment tested varying approaches for utilizing an Embodied Pedagogical Agent (EPA) to function as a tutor during interaction in a game-based environment. Conditions were authored to assess the tradeoffs between embedding an EPA directly in a game, embedding an EPA in GIFT’s browser-based Tutor-User Interface (TUI), or using audio prompts alone with no social grounding. The resulting data supports the application of using an EPA embedded in GIFT’s TUI to provide explicit feedback during a game-based learning event. Analyses revealed conditions with an EPA situated in the TUI to be as effective as embedding the agent directly in the game environment. This inference is based on evidence showing reliable differences across conditions on the metrics of performance and self-reported mental demand and feedback usefulness items. This research provides source modality tradeoffs linked to tactics for relaying training relevant explicit information to a user based on real-time performance in a game. iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I underestimated the difficulty in acknowledging all of those worthy of recognition, as there are too many to list. It’s been a wild, fun and extremely stressful ride over the past few years and there are a number of individuals to thank. I apologize if I miss you. First and foremost, I would like to thank my advisor Dr. Jan Cannon-Bowers, my co- chair Dr. Clint Bowers, and the rest of my committee: Dr. Robert Sottilare, Dr. Rudy McDaniel, and Dr. Peter Kincaid. I couldn’t have asked for a better group of professionals to share this experience with. In particular, I would like to thank Jan and Clint for allowing me to tackle this mountain in my own way, and I appreciate the guidance and support throughout. Your expertise on game-based learning and experimental design was invaluable. Jan, you were instrumental right from the start. Your smarts and experience helped me through the difficult phases, and your coaching was just what I needed to get through the initial gauntlet of developing a topic. I’m thankful for the friendship we developed during this process. I would also like to thank a number of individuals from the U.S. Army Research Laboratory (ARL) and the Simulation and Training Technology Center (STTC). For starters, I would like to thank my fellow LITE Labbers for being an awesome group of individuals to work with on a daily basis. Dr. Heather Holden, Janice Connor, and Dr. Anne Sinatra, thanks for all the help and for being a listening ear when I needed one. I owe a special thanks to Dr. Keith Brawner. You were as critical as ever when we traveled to West Point for data collection. I would also like to thank John Hart, Chris Metevier and Chuck Amburn for helping me stay motivated throughout the entire process. Last but not least, I have a large debt of gratitude to Dr. Robert Sottilare. Bob served an integral role in my development over the past three years, and I iv would not have been able to accomplish this feat without his support and guidance. Thanks for being a dedicated leader and for mentoring me on both a professional and personal level. Next, I would like to thank my family and friends for all the love and support during my stint as a graduate student; especially for putting up with me during the rough times. My father Stephen and my mother Elaine were integral in keeping me sane through this process. Thanks for keeping me grounded and for always helping me keep my eye on the prize. A special thanks goes to my brother Jordan and my sister in-law Shelley. You gave me a place to escape the insanity and you were the perfect target allowing me to rant and vent about all the pains and pleasures of working through a dissertation. Lastly, I owe a big thank you to a few notable individuals from the United States Military Academy at West Point. Dr. Mike Matthews, you’re the man! I can’t express how great it’s been to work with you across multiple projects over the past few years. I consider myself lucky to have gotten to know you so well. You’re support and determination was essential to this study becoming a reality. I am indebted to you for your true professionalism and your gracious hospitality. I would also like to thank Colonel Jim Ness, Bess Georgoulas, and Dr. Elizabeth Velilla. You were essential pieces to my data collection, and your support and motivation for the research being conducted made the whole experience that much more enjoyable. v TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES ....................................................................................................................... ix LIST OF TABLES ......................................................................................................................... xi LIST OF ACRONYMS ............................................................................................................... xiii CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................... 1 Simulation-Based Training ......................................................................................................... 2 Feedback in Simulation-Based Training ................................................................................. 6 Intelligent Tutoring Systems ................................................................................................... 8 Statement of the Problem ............................................................................................................ 9 Purpose of the Study ................................................................................................................. 12 Research Questions ................................................................................................................... 14 CHAPTER 2: BACKGROUND ................................................................................................... 15 Chapter Two Summary ............................................................................................................. 15 Serious Games ........................................................................................................................... 16 Current State of Serious Games ............................................................................................ 19 Design Principles in Serious Games...................................................................................... 21 Components of Intelligent Tutoring Systems ............................................................................ 25 Learner Modeling .................................................................................................................. 28 Domain Modeling .................................................................................................................. 29 Pedagogical Modeling ........................................................................................................... 33 Communication Module ........................................................................................................ 34 Domain Independency and Current Limitations ................................................................... 34 CHAPTER 3: LITERATURE REVIEW ...................................................................................... 38 Chapter 3 Summary ..................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • JP 4-02.2 JTTP for Patient Movement in Joint Operations, 30 Dec 1996
    Joint Pub 4-02.2 Joint Tactics, Techniques and Procedures for Patient Movement in Joint Operations 30 December 1996 PREFACE 1. Scope restrict the authority of the joint force commander (JFC) from organizing the force a. This publication delineates requirements and executing the mission in a manner the JFC and considerations for joint patient movement deems most appropriate to ensure unity of in the Health Service Support (HSS) system effort in the accomplishment of the overall as well as HSS aspects of joint patient mission. movement planning, special operations, and military operations other than war. The 3. Application doctrine described applies to the exercise of command and control by joint force a. Doctrine and selected tactics, commanders engaged in all types of techniques, and procedures and guidance operations and exercises. established in this publication apply to the commanders of combatant commands, b. Where specific tactics, techniques, and subunified commands, joint task forces, and procedures for HSS are not addressed in this subordinate components of these commands. publication, they can be found in Service HSS These principles and guidance also may apply documents. when significant forces of one Service are attached to forces of another Service or when 2. Purpose significant forces of one Service support forces of another Service. This publication has been prepared under the direction of the Chairman of the Joint b. The guidance in this publication is Chiefs of Staff. It sets forth doctrine and authoritative; as such, this doctrine will be selected joint tactics, techniques, and followed except when, in the judgment of the procedures (JTTP) to govern the joint commander, exceptional circumstances activities and performance of the Armed dictate otherwise.
    [Show full text]
  • Soldier's Manual and Trainer's Guide
    STP 8-68W13-SM-TG 3 May 2013 SOLDIER’S MANUAL AND TRAINER’S GUIDE MOS 68W HEALTH CARE SPECIALIST SKILL LEVELS 1/2/3 HEADQUARTERS, DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY DISTRIBUTION RESTRICTION: Distribution authorized to US Government agencies and their contractors only to protect technical and operational information from automatic dissemination under the International Exchange Program or by other means. This determination was made on 12 September 2011. Other requests for this documentation will be referred to MCCS-IN, 3630 Stanley Rd Ste 101 Ft Sam Houston, TX 78234-6100. DESTRUCTION NOTICE: Destroy by any approved method, i.e., shredding, pulping, or pulverizing, that will prevent disclosure of contents or reconstruction of this document.. This publication is available at Army Knowledge Online (https://armypubs.us.army.mil/doctrine/index.html). To receive publishing updates, please subscribe at http://www.apd.army.mil/AdminPubs/new_subscribe.asp. STP 8-68W13-SM-TG 1SOLDIER TRAINING PUBLICATION HEADQUARTERS No. 8-68W13-SM-TG DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY Washington, DC 3 May 2013 SOLDIER’s MANUAL and TRAINER’S GUIDE MOS 68W Health Care Specialist Skill Levels 1, 2 and 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE Table of Contents………………………………….…………………………………………….i Preface………………………………………………………………..……………………….…..v Chapter 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................... 1-1 1-1. General .............................................................................................................. 1-1 1-2.
    [Show full text]
  • K9 Tactical Emergency Casualty Care (K9-Tecc) Guidelines K9 Tecc
    K9 TACTICAL EMERGENCY CASUALTY CARE (K9-TECC) GUIDELINES DATED: 20161213 Co-Leads: Lee Palmer DVM, MS, DACVECC, CCRP, NRP, WEMT, EMT-T, TP-C Allen Yee MD, FACEP, FAAEM "The Operational K9 – Our Companions, our Teammates, our Defenders – Let’s protect those who protect us” K9 TECC - DIRECT THREAT CARE (DTC) GOALS: 1. Accomplish the mission with minimal casualties 2. Maintain tactical superiority 3. Expect to keep the K9 team (handler and / or K9) maximally engaged in neutralizing the existing threat (e.g. active shooter, structural collapse, confined space, HAZMAT, etc.) 4. Maintain team safety by ensuring, when feasible, that the K9 handler is always involved when handling an injured K9. 5. Move the downed K9 team to a safe position and prevent any human or K9 casualty from sustaining additional injuries 6. Treat immediately life-threatening hemorrhage. 7. Minimize public harm PRINCIPLES: 1. The term “Operational K9” or OpK9 refers to the distinct subpopulation of elite civilian working canines (K9s) that operate in high-threat or tactical environments. Examples include K9s that serve federal and local law enforcement (LE) and force protection agencies (e.g. Police, TSA, FBI, ATF, US Marshals Service, US Customs and Border Protection, etc.); and Search-and-Rescue groups (e.g. FEMA USAR, various Sheriff County’s SAR K9 Teams, etc.) 2. Establish and maintain tactical control and defer in depth medical interventions if engaged in ongoing direct threat (e.g. active fire fight, structural collapse, dynamic post- explosive scenario, etc.). 3. Threat mitigation techniques will minimize risk to casualties and the providers. These should include techniques and tools for rapid casualty access and egress.
    [Show full text]
  • (Sof) Medical Support
    NATO UNCLASSIFIED NATO STANDARD AMedP-4.13 NATO SPECIAL OPERATIONS FORCES (SOF) MEDICAL SUPPORT (Final Draft) Edition A Version 1 MONTH 2020 NORTH ATLANTIC TREATY ORGANIZATION ALLIED MEDICAL PUBLICATION Published by the NATO STANDARDIZATION OFFICE (NSO) © NATO/OTAN NATO UNCLASSIFIED NATO UNCLASSIFIED INTENTIONALLY BLANK NATO UNCLASSIFIED NATO UNCLASSIFIED NORTH ATLANTIC TREATY ORGANIZATION (NATO) NATO STANDARDIZATION OFFICE (NSO) NATO LETTER OF PROMULGATION [Date] 1. The enclosed Allied Medical Publication AMedP-4.13, Edition A, Version 1] NATO SPECIAL OPERATIONS FORCES (SOF) MEDICAL SUPPORT, which has been approved by the nations in the [TA], is promulgated herewith. The agreement of nations to use this publication is recorded in STANAG 6541. 2. AMedP-4.13, Edition A, Version 1 is effective upon receipt/will come into effect on [NED]. 3. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, used commercially, adapted, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photo-copying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher. With the exception of commercial sales, this does not apply to member or partner nations, or NATO commands and bodies. 4. This publication shall be handled in accordance with C-M(2002)60. Zoltán GULYÁS Brigadier General, HUNAF Director, NATO Standardization Office NATO UNCLASSIFIED NATO UNCLASSIFIED INTENTIONALLY BLANK NATO UNCLASSIFIED NATO UNCLASSIFIED AMedP-4.13 RESERVED FOR NATIONAL LETTER OF PROMULGATION I Edition A Version 1 NATO UNCLASSIFIED NATO UNCLASSIFIED AMedP-4.13 INTENTIONALLY BLANK II Edition A Version 1 NATO UNCLASSIFIED NATO UNCLASSIFIED AMedP-4.13 RECORD OF RESERVATIONS CHAPTER RECORD OF RESERVATION BY NATIONS Note: The reservations listed on this page include only those that were recorded at time of promulgation and may not be complete.
    [Show full text]
  • Aeromedical Evacuation
    Aeromedical Evacuation Chapter 4 Aeromedical Evacuation Introduction Evacuation of injured personnel using aircraft, fixed or rotary wing, has revolutionized the rapid transport of casualties from areas where there is either inadequate or no care available to medical treatment facilities (MTFs) where essential and/or definitive care can be rendered. While an aircraft can decrease transport time, the aeromedical environment creates unique stresses on the injured patient. The following are terms that describe evacuation of patients using aircraft. Casualty evacuation (CASEVAC): The movement of a casualty from the point of injury to medical treatment by nonmedical personnel. Casualties transported under these circumstances do not receive en route medical care; if the casualty’s medical condition deteriorates during transport, an adverse impact on the casualty’s prognosis and long-term disability may result. Traditionally, this situation involves a helicopter mission returning from the battlefield. Medical evacuation (MEDEVAC): The timely, efficient movement and en route care provided by medical personnel to the wounded being evacuated from the battlefield to MTFs, using medically equipped vehicles or aircraft. Examples include civilian aeromedical helicopter services and Army air ambulances. This term also covers the transfer of patients from the battlefield to an MTF or from one MTF to another by medical personnel, such as from a ship to shore. Aeromedical evacuation (AE): Providing USAF fixed-wing intratheater (Tactical Evacuation [TACEVAC]: from the combat zone to points outside the combat zone, and between points within the communications zone) and intertheater (Strategic Evacuation [STRATEVAC]: from out of the theater 4.1 Emergency War Surgery of operations to a main support area) movement of sick or injured personnel, with enroute care provided by AE crewmembers and critical care air transport teams (CCATTs), to locations offering appropriate levels of medical care.
    [Show full text]
  • MR Mag Issue 18. October 2006
    8 1 E U S S I T H E O F F I C I A L M A G A Z I N E F O R M O U N T A I N R E S C U E I N E N G L A N D , W A L E S & I R E L A N D OO CC TT OO BB EE RR 22 00 00 66 PPSSYYCCHHIIAATTRRIICC IILLLLNNEESSSS IINN MMOOUUNNTTAAIINN RREESSCCUUEE MMOONNEEYY TTAALLKKSS WWIITTHH AANNDDYY KKIIRRKKPPAATTRRIICCKK TTHHEE SSEECCUURREE CCAASSUUAALLTTYY SSYYSSTTEEMM NNIINNEE YYEEAARRSS OOFF GGPPSS TTRRAACCKKIINNGG AANNDD LLOOCCAATTIIOONN FFRROOMM VVIISSIIOONN TTOO RREEAALLIITTYY IINNCCIIDDEENNTT RREEPPOORRTTSS TTHHEE TTAALLEESS BBEEHHIINNDD TTHHEE SSTTAATTSS PPlluuss NNEEWWSS && VVIIEEWWSS FFRROOMM TTHHEE MMRRCC AANNDD AARROOUUNNDD TTHHEE RREEGGIIOONNSS wwwwww..mmoouunnttaaiinn..rreessccuuee..oorrgg..uukk £2.50 mountains and mountaineering observed, ‘Unity is ...A WORD misconceived as an ideal if it achieves a dull uniformity. Diversity is enlivening when held within FROM THE TOP reasonable bounds’. We should therefore take satisfaction from the CHURCH MILLS LIMITED E D I T O R I A L catholic nature of our organisation and try to New Magnetic Rope Warning System TAMoBuntaLineEerin.g .is. an individualistic and at embrace as many of the varied thoughts as Editor times anarchistic pursuit and it comes as no possible. This also means that the larger elements Genesis Reflective Warning Rope & Blankets receive Emergency Services Endorsement Judy Whiteside of mountain rescue do not have a monopoly on Rossendale & Pendle MRT surprise that mountain rescue, spawned of good ideas and best practices and we all need to 8 bridgefoot close . boothstown .
    [Show full text]
  • SOLDIER's MANUAL and TRAINER's GUIDE MOS 68W Health Care Specialist Skill Levels 1, 2 and 3
    STP 8-68W13-SM-TG APRIL 2009 SOLDIER’S MANUAL AND TRAINER’S GUIDE MOS 68W HEALTH CARE SPECIALIST SKILL LEVELS 1/2/3 HEADQUARTERS, DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY DISTRIBUTION RESTRICTION: Distribution authorized to US Government agencies and their contractors only to protect technical and operational information from automatic dissemination under the International Exchange Program or by other means. This determination was made on 16 April 2003. Other requests for this documentation will be referred to Commander, US Army Medical Department Center and School, Department of Training Support (MCCS-HT), Fort Sam Houston, Texas 78234-5078. DESTRUCTION NOTICE: Destroy by any means that will prevent disclosure of contents or reconstruction of the document. This publication is available at Army Knowledge Online (www.us.army.mil) and General Dennis J. Reimer Training and Doctrine Digital Library at (www.train.army.mil). STP 8-68W13-SM-TG 1SOLDIER TRAINING PUBLICATION HEADQUARTERS No. 8-68W13-SM-TG DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY Washington, DC, 15 April 2009 SOLDIER'S MANUAL AND TRAINER'S GUIDE MOS 68W Health Care Specialist Skill Levels 1, 2 AND 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE Table of Contents ....................................................................................................................... i Preface ...................................................................................................................................... iii Chapter 1. Introduction ......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Tactical Emergency Casualty Care (TECC) Guidelines Current As of June 2015
    Tactical Emergency Casualty Care (TECC) Guidelines Current as of June 2015 DIRECT THREAT (DT) / HOT ZONE CARE Goals: 1. Accomplish the mission with minimal casualties 2. Prevent any casualty from sustaining additional injuries 3. Keep response team maximally engaged in neutralizing the existing threat (e.g. active shooter, unstable building, confined space HAZMAT, etc.) 4. Minimize public harm Principles: 1. Establish tactical supremacy and defer in depth medical interventions if engaged in ongoing direct threat (e.g. active fire fight, unstable building collapse, dynamic post-explosive scenario, etc.). 2. Threat mitigation techniques will minimize risk to casualties and the providers. These should include techniques and tools for rapid casualty access and egress. 3. Triage should be deferred to a later phase of care. Prioritization for extraction is based on resources available and the tactical situation. 4. Minimal trauma interventions are warranted. 5. Consider hemorrhage control a. TQ application is the primary “medical” intervention to be considered in Direct Threat. b. Consider instructing casualty to apply direct pressure to the wound if no tourniquet available or application is not tactically feasible. 6. Consider quickly placing or directing casualty to be placed in position to protect airway. Direct Threat / Hot Zone Care Guidelines: 1. Mitigate any threat and move to a safer position (e.g. Return fire, utilize less lethal technology, assume an overwhelming force posture, extraction from immediate structural collapse, etc.). 2. Direct the casualty to stay engaged in any tactical operation if appropriate. 3. Direct the casualty to move to a safer position and apply self-aid if able. 4.
    [Show full text]
  • NATO STANDARD Amedp-9.2 GUIDELINES for A
    NATO STANDARD AMedP-9.2 GUIDELINES FOR A MULTINATIONAL MEDICAL UNIT Edition A Version 1 JANUARY 2018 NORTH ATLANTIC TREATY ORGANIZATION ALLIED MEDICAL PUBLICATION Published by the NATO STANDARDIZATION OFFICE (NSO) © NATO/OTAN INTENTIONALLY BLANK NORTH ATLANTIC TREATY ORGANIZATION (NATO) NATO STANDARDIZATION OFFICE (NSO) NATO LETTER OF PROMULGATION 15 January 2018 1. The enclosed Allied Medical Publication AMedP-9.2, Edition A, Version 1, GUIDELINES FOR A MULTINATIONAL MEDICAL UNIT, which has been approved by the nations in the Military Committee Medical Standardization Board, is promulgated herewith. The agreement of nations to use this publication is recorded in STANAG 2552. 2. AMedP-9.2, Edition A, Version 1, is effective upon receipt and supersedes AMedP-1.3, Edition A, Version 1, which shall be destroyed in accordance with the local procedure for the destruction of documents. 3. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, used comn1ercially, adapted, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photo-copying, recording or otherwise, without the prior perrnission of the publisher. With the exception of commercial sales, this does not apply to member or partner nations, or NATO commands and bodies. 4. This publication shall be handled in accordance with C-M (2002)60. Edvardas MAZEIKIS Major General, LTUAF Director, NATO Standardization Office INTENTIONALLY BLANK AMedP-9.2 RESERVED FOR NATIONAL LETTER OF PROMULGATION I Edition A Version 1 AMedP-9.2 INTENTIONALLY BLANK II Edition A Version 1 AMedP-9.2 RECORD OF RESERVATIONS CHAPTER RECORD OF RESERVATION BY NATIONS The reservations listed on this page include only those that were recorded at time of promulgation and may not be complete.
    [Show full text]
  • Tactical Emergency Casualty Care (TECC): Guidelines for the Provision of Prehospital Trauma Care in High Threat
    20 TECC-Summer-Fall 11-2_TCCC 9/5/11 6:40 PM Page 104 TacTical EmErgEncy casualTy carE (TEcc): guidElinEs for ThE Provision of PrEhosPiTal Trauma carE in high ThrEaT EnvironmEnTs Callaway DW; Smith ER; Cain J; Shapiro G; Burnett WT; McKay SD; and Mabry R Corresponding Author: David W. Callaway, MD Director, The Operational Medicine Institute (OMI) Assistant Professor of Emergency Medicine Carolinas Medical Center 1000 Blythe Blvd Charlotte, NC 28203 Authors E. Reed Smith, MD W Thomas Burnett, MD, FACEP Operational Medical Director Operational Medicine Director Arlington County Fire Department Department of Emergency Medicine Assistant Professor of Emergency Medicine Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine The George Washington University Address is 1020 North Hudson Street, 3rd Floor Sean D. McKay, EMT-P Arlington, VA 22201 Associate, Asymmetric Combat Institute (ACI) 115-136 Wade Hampton Blvd. Jeffery S. Cain, MD Taylors, SC 29687 Medical Director, McKinney SWAT 2804 Atwood Drive Robert L. Mabry, MD McKinney, TX 75070 United States Army Institute of Surgical Research Geoff Shapiro, EMT-P 3400 Rawley E, Chambers Ave Coordinator, Operational Medicine Programs Fort Sam Houston, TX 78234 The George Washington University 2131 K Street, NW Suite 510 Washington, DC 20037 104 Journal of Special Operations Medicine Volume 11, Edition 3 / Summer/Fall 11 20 TECC-Summer-Fall 11-2_TCCC 9/5/11 6:40 PM Page 105 inTroducTion Civilian Tactical Emergency Medical Support (TEMS) has a long history in the United States. Enormous progress has been made during the past ten years in developing professional and operational standards within the field. However, to date, there still exists no standard of care within TEMS specifically, and more broadly for high threat pre- hospital trauma care.
    [Show full text]
  • JP 4-02, Joint Health Services
    Joint Publication 4-02 OF NT TH E E W M I S E' L L H D T E F T E N A R D R A M P Y E D • • U A N C I I T R E E D M S A T F AT E S O Joint Health Services 17 December 2017 Incorporating Change 1 28 September 2018 PREFACE 1. Scope This publication provides doctrine to plan, prepare, and execute joint and combined health services across the range of military operations. 2. Purpose This publication has been prepared under the direction of the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff (CJCS). It sets forth joint doctrine to govern the activities and performance of the Armed Forces of the United States in joint operations, and it provides considerations for military interaction with governmental and nongovernmental agencies, multinational forces, and other interorganizational partners. It provides military guidance for the exercise of authority by combatant commanders and other joint force commanders (JFCs), and prescribes joint doctrine for operations and training. It provides military guidance for use by the Armed Forces in preparing and executing their plans and orders. It is not the intent of this publication to restrict the authority of the JFC from organizing the force and executing the mission in a manner the JFC deems most appropriate to ensure unity of effort in the accomplishment of objectives. 3. Application a. Joint doctrine established in this publication applies to the Joint Staff, commanders of combatant commands, subordinate unified commands, joint task forces, subordinate components of these commands, the Services, and combat support agencies.
    [Show full text]
  • FIRST AID of Violence in Armed Conflicts and Other Situations FIRST AID in Armed Conflicts and Other Situations of Violence
    FIRST AID FIRST of violence situations in armed conflicts and other FIRST AID in armed conflicts and other situations of violence International Committee of the Red Cross 19, avenue de la Paix 1202 Geneva, Switzerland T + 41 22 734 60 01 F + 41 22 733 20 57 E-mail: [email protected] icrc.org 0870/002 06.2010 2500 © ICRC, April 2006 FIRST AID FIRST of violence situations in armed conflicts and other FIRST AID in armed conflicts and other situations of violence International Committee of the Red Cross 19, avenue de la Paix 1202 Geneva, Switzerland T + 41 22 734 60 01 F + 41 22 733 20 57 E-mail: [email protected] icrc.org 0870/002 06.2010 2500 © ICRC, April 2006 FIRST AID in armed conflicts and other situations of violence To all the men and women who come to the rescue of their fellow human beings, demonstrating every day, through their discreet and disinterested action and sometimes at the risk of their own lives, that caring and respect for others bring meaning to life and give us all reason for hope. FIRST AID FOREWORD First Aid is not simply performing artificial respiration, bandaging a wound or taking an injured person to hospital. It is also taking someone’s hand, reassuring the frightened, giving a bit of one’s self. In armed conflicts and other situations of violence, First Aiders take the risk of suffering harm from such dangers as gunfire, collapsing buildings, burning cars, unstable rubble and tear gas. They step forward to help the wounded when the most natural reflex would be to run the other way.
    [Show full text]