DOCSLIB.ORG

Legislative Record - Senate, Wednesday, March 31, 2010

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Legislative Record - Senate, Wednesday, March 31, 2010 LEGISLATIVE RECORD - SENATE, WEDNESDAY, MARCH 31, 2010 STATE OF MAINE Comes from the House, PASSED TO BE ENGROSSED AS ONE HUNDRED AND TWENTY-FOURTH LEGISLATURE AMENDED BY COMMITTEE AMENDMENT "A" (S-386) AS SECOND REGULAR SESSION AMENDED BY HOUSE AMENDMENT "A" (H-801) thereto, in JOURNAL OF THE SENATE NON-CONCURRENCE. In Senate Chamber On motion by Senator GOODALL of Sagadahoc, TABLED until Wednesday Later in Today’s Session, pending FURTHER CONSIDERATION. March 31, 2010 _________________________________ Senate called to order by President Elizabeth H. Mitchell of Kennebec County. Non-Concurrent Matter _________________________________ Bill "An Act To Promote the Establishment of Innovative Schools" (EMERGENCY) Prayer by Pastor Mark Wilson, Phippsburg Congregational S.P. 706 L.D. 1801 Church, UCC. (C "A" S-455) PASTOR WILSON: Good morning, folks. I drove an hour up In Senate, March 25, 2010, PASSED TO BE ENGROSSED AS here this morning first of all to say thank you. We all are in AMENDED BY COMMITTEE AMENDMENT "A" (S-455). positions, I think, where we hear a lot of bad news, so I just want to say thank you for all the work that you do. Thank you very Comes from the House, PASSED TO BE ENGROSSED AS much. Let us pray together please. AMENDED BY COMMITTEE AMENDMENT "A" (S-455) AS God of all nations and all peoples, You have said to us how AMENDED BY HOUSE AMENDMENT "A" (H-800) thereto, in good and pleasant it is when we dwell in unity and You have said NON-CONCURRENCE. to us, 'Blessed are the peacemakers, for they shall be called your children.' When we give credence to voices that would rile us in Senator ALFOND of Cumberland moved the Senate RECEDE anger and divisiveness we do nothing but feed our great and CONCUR. adversary. We thank You, God of peace, that this week our leaders have chosen a path of listening to each other and have On motion by Senator RAYE of Washington, TABLED until Later shared in the peace that a sense of common purpose brings. Let in Today’s Session, pending the motion by Senator ALFOND of us learn from these moments and move faithfully together into the Cumberland to RECEDE and CONCUR. future that You have prepared for us all. Amen. _________________________________ _________________________________ ORDERS Reading of the Journal of Tuesday, March 30, 2010. Joint Order _________________________________ Expressions of Legislative Sentiment recognizing: Doctor of the day, Dr. Heather Sharkey, DO of Freeport. The 95th Anniversary of the Armenian Genocide. On April 24, _________________________________ 1915, a campaign was launched by the Turkish regime of the Ottoman Empire against the Armenian people, resulting in the Off Record Remarks death of more than 1.5 million Armenians. Some of the survivors settled in the State of Maine, and their heirs have made _________________________________ significant contributions to the State. We join our citizens of Armenian heritage on April 24th in remembering this event, and PAPERS FROM THE HOUSE we express our deepest sympathy for the families of those who perished; Non-Concurrent Matter SLS 434 Bill "An Act To Amend the Site Location of Development Laws To Sponsored by Senator BRANNIGAN of Cumberland. Include Consideration of Greenhouse Gas Emissions" Cosponsored by Senator: President MITCHELL of Kennebec, S.P. 341 L.D. 891 Representative: Speaker PINGREE of North Haven. (S "C" S-489 to C "A" S-386) READ. In Senate, March 29, 2010, PASSED TO BE ENGROSSED AS AMENDED BY COMMITTEE AMENDMENT "A" (S-386) AS THE PRESIDENT: The Chair recognizes the Senator from AMENDED BY SENATE AMENDMENT "C" (S-489) thereto. Cumberland, Senator Brannigan. S-1700 LEGISLATIVE RECORD - SENATE, WEDNESDAY, MARCH 31, 2010 Senator BRANNIGAN: Thank you, Madame President. Men and women of the Senate, we are reminded today of man's Ought to Pass As Amended inhumanity to man. The Armenian Genocide is also known as the Armenian Holocaust, the Armenian Massacre, and as the Great The Committee on UTILITIES AND ENERGY on Bill "An Act Calamity of the Armenians. I'm also reading a book by someone Concerning the Allocation of Power Generated by GNE, LLC" who went through this terrible ordeal and survived, Armenian H.P. 388 L.D. 543 Golgotha. The Armenian Genocide was a massacre of over a million Armenians by the Ottoman Empire during and just after Reported that the same Ought to Pass as Amended by World War I. It is just one of the examples of a modern genocide. Committee Amendment "A" (H-803). In the paper last September there was a headline Armenia and Turkey Will Start Talks To Establish Diplomatic Relations. The Comes from the House with the Report READ and ACCEPTED reason they don't have diplomatic relations is that Turkey believes and the Bill PASSED TO BE ENGROSSED AS AMENDED BY it never happened. There wasn't a genocide. It was much less COMMITTEE AMENDMENT "A" (H-803). than that. They used tactics such as mass burning, poisoning, drowning, deportation, extermination camps, and death marches Report READ and ACCEPTED, in concurrence. to destroy the Armenian population. Villagers were gathered and burned together. Women and children were loaded on a boat READ ONCE. which subsequently capsized and they were drowned. They were exposed to toxic gas and poison, often in deadly quantities. Many Committee Amendment "A" (H-803) READ and ADOPTED, in were deported and their land and possessions stolen. Experts concurrence. also believe that 25 extermination camps existed. People lived in them a very short time. Finally innocent women, men, and ASSIGNED FOR SECOND READING NEXT LEGISLATIVE children were marched out of their towns and into the desert with DAY. no facilities or food, with no water, just to be left there to die. In August 1915 a New York Times, our own newspaper in New _________________________________ York, printed a report stating the roads in Euphrates were strewn with corpses of exiles and those who survived were doomed to Senate certain death. It's gruesome. We have to feel sympathy for even the people who were so lucky to have been able to survive. Their Divided Report relatives were able to survive. A great deal of culture was lost in the genocide. People have recovered with the help and The Majority of the Committee on LABOR on Bill "An Act To recognition of other nations. Now there are over 135 memorials Protect Maine Workers" in 25 countries that commemorate this genocide. We do it every S.P. 593 L.D. 1545 year. I'm pleased to do it, as was Senator Brennan before me, because of these folks who live in our area. I urge you, as much Reported that the same Ought to Pass as Amended by as you might not want to do this, next year when you are reading Committee Amendment "A" (S-495). in the newspaper or listening, note the genocides that are going on right now. Just take a count. Some of us, when we get back Signed: here next year, will talk about it again. Thank you very much. Senators: THE PRESIDENT: The Chair recognizes the Senator from JACKSON of Aroostook Cumberland, Senator Davis. GERZOFSKY of Cumberland Senator DAVIS: Thank you, Madame President. Men and Representatives: women of the Senate, as a teacher at Portland High School and a CLARK of Millinocket coach I had several Armenians in class. Some of the finest BLODGETT of Augusta people I've ever had the pleasure to know. I had Bob Laconian TUTTLE of Sanford on my football team. He was in the United States Marines. He BUTTERFIELD of Bangor still lives in Portland. I had his sister in class. They are very fine GILBERT of Jay people. Also had shish kebab. They are very fine people and I'm DRISCOLL of Westbrook very proud to have known them and been associated with them. Thank you, Madame President. The Minority of the same Committee on the same subject reported that the same Ought To Pass as Amended by PASSED. Committee Amendment "B" (S-496). Ordered sent down forthwith for concurrence. Signed: _________________________________ Senator: MILLS of Somerset REPORTS OF COMMITTEES House S-1701 LEGISLATIVE RECORD - SENATE, WEDNESDAY, MARCH 31, 2010 Representatives: PASSED TO BE ENACTED and having been signed by the THIBODEAU of Winterport President were presented by the Secretary to the Governor for his HAMPER of Oxford approval. CUSHING of Hampden BICKFORD of Auburn _________________________________ Reports READ. An Act To Amend the Laws Regarding Authority over and Oversight of Certified Nursing Assistant Educational Programs Senator JACKSON of Aroostook moved the Senate ACCEPT the H.P. 1205 L.D. 1704 Majority OUGHT TO PASS AS AMENDED BY COMMITTEE (H "A" H-781 to C "A" H-736) AMENDMENT "A" (S-495) Report. On motion by Senator DIAMOND of Cumberland, placed on the On further motion by same Senator, TABLED until Later in SPECIAL APPROPRIATIONS TABLE, pending ENACTMENT, Today’s Session, pending the motion by same Senator to in concurrence. ACCEPT the Majority OUGHT TO PASS AS AMENDED BY COMMITTEE AMENDMENT "A" (S-495) Report. _________________________________ _________________________________ An Act To Strengthen the Ballot Initiative Process S.P. 662 L.D. 1730 ENACTORS (S "B" S-481; S "C" S-487 to C "A" S-443) The Committee on Engrossed Bills reported as truly and strictly engrossed the following: Senator RAYE of Washington requested a Roll Call. Emergency Measure On motion by same Senator, TABLED until Later in Today’s Session, pending ENACTMENT, in concurrence. (Roll Call An Act To Ensure Fairness in Penalties for Administrative Errors Requested) in the Long-term Care Assessment Process H.P. 1056 L.D. 1507 _________________________________ (C "A" H-782) Senate at Ease.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • CGN 9 Long Beach - 1983
    CGN 9 Long Beach - 1983 United States Type: CGN - Nuclear Powered Guided Missile Cruiser Max Speed: 31 kt Commissioned: 1983 Length: 219.8 m Beam: 22.3 m Draft: 9.3 m Crew: 825 Displacement: 15525 t Displacement Full: 17500 t Propulsion: 2x C1W Nuclear Reactors Sensors / EW: - AN/SPG-35 [Mk56 GFCS] - Radar, Radar, FCR, Surface-to-Air & Surface-to-Surface, Short-Range, Max range: 25.9 km - AN/SQQ-23B PAIR - (Single-Dome) Hull Sonar, Active/Passive, Hull Sonar, Active/Passive Search & Attack, Max range: 37 km - AN/SPS-48C - (1978) Radar, Radar, Air Search, 3D Long-Range, Max range: 407.4 km - AN/SPG-55B [Mk76 Mod 9 FCS] - (1978) Radar, Radar, FCR, Surface-to-Air, Medium-Range, Max range: 277.8 km - LN-66LP - (AN/SPS-59, 10kW) Radar, Radar, Surface Search, Short-Range, Max range: 59.3 km - AN/SLQ-32(V)3 [ECM] - (Group, 1983) ECM, OECM & DECM, Offensive & Defensive ECM, Max range: 0 km - AN/SLQ-32(V)3 [ESM] - (Group, 1983) ESM, ELINT, Max range: 926 km - AN/SPS-67(V)1 - (1982) Radar, Radar, Surface Search & Navigation, Max range: 64.8 km - AN/SPS-49(V)2 - (1982) Radar, Radar, Air Search, 2D Long-Range, Max range: 463 km Weapons / Loadouts: - Generic GMTR [Guided Missile Training Round] - (Aka Drill Round) Training Round. - RIM-67B SM-2ER Blk I - (1981, No Datalink) Guided Weapon. Air Max: 148.2 km. Surface Max: 46.3 km. - 127mm/38 HE-PD [HiCap] - (USN) Gun. Air Max: 2.8 km. Surface Max: 16.7 km. Land Max: 16.7 km.
    [Show full text]
  • Oversight Review of the U.S. Navy's Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) Program" December 8, 2016
    i [H.A.S.C. No. 114–145] OVERSIGHT REVIEW OF THE U.S. NAVY’S LITTORAL COMBAT SHIP PROGRAM HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT AND INVESTIGATIONS OF THE COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED FOURTEENTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION HEARING HELD DECEMBER 8, 2016 U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE 23–763 WASHINGTON : 2017 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Publishing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 SUBCOMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT AND INVESTIGATIONS VICKY HARTZLER, Missouri, Chairwoman JEFF MILLER, Florida JACKIE SPEIER, California K. MICHAEL CONAWAY, Texas JIM COOPER, Tennessee JOSEPH J. HECK, Nevada HENRY C. ‘‘HANK’’ JOHNSON, JR., Georgia AUSTIN SCOTT, Georgia GWEN GRAHAM, Florida MARTHA MCSALLY, Arizona HEATH BOPE, Professional Staff Member KATY QUINN, Professional Staff Member ANNA WATERFIELD, Clerk (II) C O N T E N T S Page STATEMENTS PRESENTED BY MEMBERS OF CONGRESS Hartzler, Hon. Vicky, a Representative from Missouri, Chairwoman, Subcom- mittee on Oversight and Investigations ............................................................. 1 Speier, Hon. Jackie, a Representative from California, Ranking Member, Sub- committee on Oversight and Investigations ...................................................... 3 WITNESSES Gilmore, Dr. J. Michael, Director, Operational Test and Evaluation, Depart- ment of Defense ...................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Navy and Coast Guard Ships Associated with Service in Vietnam and Exposure to Herbicide Agents
    Navy and Coast Guard Ships Associated with Service in Vietnam and Exposure to Herbicide Agents Background This ships list is intended to provide VA regional offices with a resource for determining whether a particular US Navy or Coast Guard Veteran of the Vietnam era is eligible for the presumption of Agent Orange herbicide exposure based on operations of the Veteran’s ship. According to 38 CFR § 3.307(a)(6)(iii), eligibility for the presumption of Agent Orange exposure requires that a Veteran’s military service involved “duty or visitation in the Republic of Vietnam” between January 9, 1962 and May 7, 1975. This includes service within the country of Vietnam itself or aboard a ship that operated on the inland waterways of Vietnam. However, this does not include service aboard a large ocean- going ship that operated only on the offshore waters of Vietnam, unless evidence shows that a Veteran went ashore. Inland waterways include rivers, canals, estuaries, and deltas. They do not include open deep-water bays and harbors such as those at Da Nang Harbor, Qui Nhon Bay Harbor, Nha Trang Harbor, Cam Ranh Bay Harbor, Vung Tau Harbor, or Ganh Rai Bay. These are considered to be part of the offshore waters of Vietnam because of their deep-water anchorage capabilities and open access to the South China Sea. In order to promote consistent application of the term “inland waterways”, VA has determined that Ganh Rai Bay and Qui Nhon Bay Harbor are no longer considered to be inland waterways, but rather are considered open water bays.
    [Show full text]
  • Naval Accidents 1945-1988, Neptune Papers No. 3
    -- Neptune Papers -- Neptune Paper No. 3: Naval Accidents 1945 - 1988 by William M. Arkin and Joshua Handler Greenpeace/Institute for Policy Studies Washington, D.C. June 1989 Neptune Paper No. 3: Naval Accidents 1945-1988 Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 1 Overview ........................................................................................................................................ 2 Nuclear Weapons Accidents......................................................................................................... 3 Nuclear Reactor Accidents ........................................................................................................... 7 Submarine Accidents .................................................................................................................... 9 Dangers of Routine Naval Operations....................................................................................... 12 Chronology of Naval Accidents: 1945 - 1988........................................................................... 16 Appendix A: Sources and Acknowledgements........................................................................ 73 Appendix B: U.S. Ship Type Abbreviations ............................................................................ 76 Table 1: Number of Ships by Type Involved in Accidents, 1945 - 1988................................ 78 Table 2: Naval Accidents by Type
    [Show full text]
  • Joint Resolution Memorializing the United States Navy to Name a New Bath Iron Works Arleigh Burke Destroyer the Uss Belknap
    HP1318, item 1, 124th Maine State Legislature JOINT RESOLUTION MEMORIALIZING THE UNITED STATES NAVY TO NAME A NEW BATH IRON WORKS ARLEIGH BURKE DESTROYER THE USS BELKNAP PLEASE NOTE: Legislative Information cannot perform research, provide legal advice, or interpret Maine law. For legal assistance, please contact a qualified attorney. JOINT RESOLUTION MEMORIALIZING THE UNITED STATES NAVY TO NAME A NEW BATH IRON WORKS ARLEIGH BURKE DESTROYER THE USS BELKNAP WE, your Memorialists, the Members of the 124th Legislature of the State of Maine now assembled in the Second Regular Session, most respectfully present and petition the Secretary of the United States Navy, as follows: WHEREAS, there have been 2 United States Navy vessels over the years named the USS Belknap after 2 admirals of the United States Navy, Rear Admiral George Eugene Belknap, 1832-1903, and his son, Rear Admiral Reginald Rowan Belknap, 1871-1959; and WHEREAS, the first USS Belknap (DD-251) was a destroyer launched in 1919 and decommissioned in 1945 after a career of valiant service; and WHEREAS, the second USS Belknap (DLG/CG-26), the lead ship of her class, was a guided missile cruiser in service from 1964 to 1995 and was built at Bath Iron Works in Bath, Maine, a prominent and historic shipyard; and WHEREAS, the second USS Belknap was severely damaged in a collision with the USS John F. Kennedy on November 22, 1975, resulting in the loss of 8 lives; and WHEREAS, the USS Belknap was reconstructed by the Philadelphia Navy Yard, this time with her superstructure made of steel, which because of the accident became the standard for all ships in classes of surface combatants; and WHEREAS, the USS Belknap returned to sea in 1980 and served with distinction over the years as a flagship and played an important role in the 1989 Malta Summit meeting of President George H.W.
    [Show full text]
  • Legislative History: Joint Resolution Memorializing The
    MAINE STATE LEGISLATURE LAW AND LEGISLATIVE REFERENCE LIBRARY Legislative History Collection 124th Legislature (2008-2010) History and Final Disposition HP1318 Joint Resolution Memorializing the United States Navy to Name a New Bath Iron Works Arleigh Burke Destroyer the USS Belknap. Presented by Representative SHAW of Standish; Cosponsored by Representatives: ADAMS of Portland, AUSTIN of Gray, AYOTTE of Caswell, BEAUDETTE of Biddeford, BEAUDOIN of Biddeford, BEAULIEU of Auburn, BECK of Waterville, BERRY of Bowdoinham, BICKFORD of Auburn, BLANCHARD of Old Town, BLODGETT of Augusta, BOLAND of Sanford, BOLDUC of Auburn, BRIGGS of Mexico, BROWNE of Vassalboro, BRYANT of Windham, BURNS of Whiting, BUTTERFIELD of Bangor, CAIN of Orono, CAMPBELL of Newfield, CAREY of Lewiston, CASAVANT of Biddeford, CEBRA of Naples, CELLI of Brewer, CHASE of Wells, CLARK of Millinocket, CLARK of Easton, CLEARY of Houlton, COHEN of Portland, CONNOR of Kennebunk, CORNELL du HOUX of Brunswick, COTTA of China, CRAFTS of Lisbon, CRAY of Palmyra, CROCKETT of Bethel, CROCKETT of Augusta, CURTIS of Madison, CUSHING of Hampden, DAVIS of Sangerville, DILL of Cape Elizabeth, DOSTIE of Sabattus, DRISCOLL of Westbrook, DUCHESNE of Hudson, EATON of Sullivan, EBERLE of South Portland, EDGECOMB of Caribou, EVES of North Berwick, FINCH of Fairfield, FITTS of Pittsfield, FLAHERTY of Scarborough, FLEMINGS of Bar Harbor, FLETCHER of Winslow, FLOOD of Winthrop, FOSSEL of Alna, GIFFORD of Lincoln, GILBERT of Jay, GILES of Belfast, GOODE of Bangor, GREELEY of Levant, HAMPER of Oxford,
    [Show full text]
  • From Destroyer Leader to Cruiser… Compiled from Wikipedia Sources by C.M
    DLG/CG 26 - From Destroyer Leader to Cruiser… Compiled from Wikipedia sources by C.M. Reeves (Originally published in the 2014 USS Belknap Reunion brochure. It has been slightly updated.) The USS Belknap (DLG 26) was built as a Destroyer Leader. To understand that terminology, it is useful to consider some background on the destroyer navy, variously called “little boys,” “tin cans,” and “greyhounds.” Evolution of the Destroyer A Naval destroyer is a fast, maneuverable warship designed to escort larger vessels and defend them against attacks by submarines and smaller surface vessels such as torpedo boats. Development of the destroyer was related to emergence of the self-propelled torpedo in the 1860s. Initially launched from small surface vessels, the torpedo provided a means for a navy to destroy a superior enemy battle fleet. In response to this new threat, “torpedo boat destroyers” evolved to escort the battle fleet at sea. These escort vessels, soon to become known simply as destroyers, needed the same seaworthiness and endurance as the ships they protected. Destroyers gradually became more capable warships, including larger guns and torpedoes among their armaments. The first ships designated as torpedo boat destroyers (TBD) were two Daring-class ships commissioned by the British Royal Navy 1895. The first US destroyer was the USS Bainbridge (DD1), commissioned in 1903 with a crew of three officers and 72 enlisted men. DD1 was one of nine ships comprising the original Bainbridge class that served the nation through World War I and emergence of a new threat: the submarine. The need to attack submarines underwater led to rapid destroyer evolution during the war; they were quickly equipped with strengthened bows for ramming, listening devices for detecting, and depth charges for attacking the submerged targets.
    [Show full text]
  • History of Uss Belknap Dlg/Cg 26
    HISTORY OF USS BELKNAP DLG/CG 26 The USS BELKNAP the first of a new class of guided missile frigates, was the second ship of the U. S. Navy to bear this name. She was named after RADM George Eugene Belknap, USN 1832-1903, and his son Reginald Rowan Belknap, USN 1871 - 1959. She was christened by Mrs. Leonard B. Cresswell, the grand- daughter and daughter of the RADMs Belknap and was launched by the Bath Iron Works, Bath, Maine on 20 July, 1963. Belknap was Commissioned on 7 November 1964 at Boston Naval Shipyard, Boston, Massachusetts, at which time Captain John T. Law USN, took command as her first Commanding Officer. After spending more than a year conducting special trials, tests, and undergoing a brief shipyard availability, Belknap commenced her pre-deployment shakedown training at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. Completing a successful training period she joined the U. S. Second Fleet. In July 1966 Captain Ernest C. Hipp Jr. relieved Captain Law as Commanding Officer. In August Belknap joined U. S., U. K., Norwegian and other units for a combined NATO operation off the coast of Norway. This carried her north of the Arctic Circle and she became a member of the select Blue Nose Society. After returning to Norfolk in September 1966, with only three weeks of preparation, Belknap departed for her first extended deployment and duty with the U. S. Sixth Fleet. She returned to Norfolk in February 1967. Belknap departed Norfolk on 5 September 1967 for a tour of duty with the U. S. Seventh Fleet, and Task Force 77.
    [Show full text]
  • U. S. S. Belknap (DLG-26) Boston Naval Shipyard Boston, Massachusetts 7 November 1964 Naval Commissioning
    U. S. S. Belknap (DLG-26) Boston Naval Shipyard Boston, Massachusetts 7 November 1964 Naval Commissioning The moment the commission pennant is broken at the masthead, the USS BELKNAP (DLG-26) becomes a naval ship of war, ready to serve her country in all respects. The commission pennant is a distinctive mark of a ship of the navy in commission, and is flown from the masthead, except when a personal flag displaces the commission pennant. The commission pennant dates back to the 17th century war be- tween Holland and England. The Dutch admiral, Admiral Tromp, hoisted a broom at his masthead, indicating his intention to sweep the British from the sea. This gesture was answered by the British admiral who hoisted a horsewhip, indicating the British intention to chastise the Dutch. The British carried out their boast and ever since, the nar- row, coach whip pennant (symbolizing the original horsewhip) has been the distinctive mark of a ship of war, and has been adopted by all nations. The modern, U. S. Navy commission pennant is blue at the hoist, with a union of seven white stars, and a red and white stripe at the fly, in two horizontal stripes. In lieu of a commission pennant, flag ships fly commodores' or admirals' personal flags. UNITED STATES SHIP BELKNAP (DESTROYER LEADER GUIDED MISSILE SHIP-26) Built by Bath Iron Works Corporation Bath, Maine Keel Laid — 3 February 1962 Launched — 20 July 1963 Commissioned — 7 November 1964 SPONSOR Mrs. Leonard B. Cressivell President of the United States Lyndon B. Johnson Robert S. McNamara Secretary of Defense "Let me promise here that the bedrock of a naval service is organization; its soul, honor; its necessity, subordination; its demand, courage; its inspi- ration, love of country; its reward, honor.
    [Show full text]
  • Cruiser Destroyer Force
    i *-> Welcome to the Cruiser The United States Navy Destroyer Force, Atlantic of the country...constantly key ships of the fleets today, stands ever ready to protect the training to make this ship the of the United States from Port- and with nuclear power and democratic way of life and to go best fighting unit possible. land, Maine, to Galveston, to the aid of allied nations guided missiles, have an im- Texas. Their operations, how- threatened with aggression. It is Like all warships of the portant role in the future. They ever, cover the entire Atlantic one of the prime deterrents world, this ship's mission is to are now, and will continue, Ocean, Caribbean, Mediterra- throughout the world. serve as a highly mobile combat steaming on the front lines to nean Seas, Indian Ocean and unit that can move swiftly, at keep open the vital sea lanes of adjoining sea areas. the world. This ship is but a small part any time, to any spot on the We are pleased to welcome of the 200 ships that make up water surfaces of the earth. the Atlantic Fleet Cruiser The Cruiser-Destroyer Force, you aboard and hope that by Atlantic, is the largest single Destroyer Force. Its crew is visiting us, you may become Ships of the cruiser and type command in the world. Its representative of the United destroyer type have played a better acquainted with the 200 ships are homeported on United States Navy, its ships, States...men from all sections vital part in naval history, are the East Coast and Gulf Coasts and the men who sail them.
    [Show full text]
  • Peace-Time Attrition Expectations for Naval Fleets an Analysis of Post-WWII Maritime Incidents
    CAN UNCLASSIFIED Peace-time attrition expectations for naval fleets An analysis of post-WWII maritime incidents David W. Mason DRDC – Centre for Operational Research and Analysis Defence Research and Development Canada Reference Document DRDC-RDDC-2017-D086 May 2018 CAN UNCLASSIFIED CAN UNCLASSIFIED IMPORTANT INFORMATIVE STATEMENTS Disclaimer: Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada (Department of National Defence) makes no representations or warranties, express or implied, of any kind whatsoever, and assumes no liability for the accuracy, reliability, completeness, currency or usefulness of any information, product, process or material included in this document. Nothing in this document should be interpreted as an endorsement for the specific use of any tool, technique or process examined in it. Any reliance on, or use of, any information, product, process or material included in this document is at the sole risk of the person so using it or relying on it. Canada does not assume any liability in respect of any damages or losses arising out of or in connection with the use of, or reliance on, any information, product, process or material included in this document. This document was reviewed for Controlled Goods by Defence Research and Development Canada (DRDC) using the Schedule to the Defence Production Act. Endorsement statement: This publication has been published by the Editorial Office of Defence Research and Development Canada, an agency of the Department of National Defence of Canada. Inquiries can be sent to: [email protected]. This document refers to an attachment. To request access to this attachment, please email [email protected], citing the DRDC document number.
    [Show full text]
  • Flight Iii Arleigh Burke Guided Missile Destroyer
    Flight iii arleigh burke guided missile destroyer Continue Class-guided missile destroyers USS Arleigh Burke in chesapeake Bay in 2013 ClassIm review: Arleigh Burke classBuilders: Ingalls Shipbuilding Bath Iron Works Operators: U.S. NavyPrepared: Class Kidd Charles F. Adams Successfully: U.S. $1,843 billion per ship (DDG 114-116, FY2011/12) Built: 1988-Present Commission: 1991-presentPlan: 82 to July 2018 Order: 3 Construction: 7Swere: 68Active: 68Lost: 0Report: 0 Served: 0 General Characteristics Type: Guided Missile DestroyerHme: Fully loaded: Flight I: 8.18 4 long tons (8315 tons) Flight II: 8300 long tons (8400 tons) IIA Flight: 9,300 long tons (9500 t) Flight III: 9,500 long tons (9,700 tons) Length: Flights I and II: 505 feet (154 m) Flight IIA : 509 feet (155 m) Beam: 66 feet (20 m) Project : 30.5 feet (9.3 m) Installed capacity: 3 × Allison AG9140 Generators (2500 kW (3,400 hp) each, 440 V)Movement: 4 × General Electric LM2500 gas turbines each generating 26,250 hp (19,570 k)W; Combined with two shafts, each of which controls a five-bladed reverse-driven propeller; Total production: 105,000 hp (78,000 kW) Speed: over 30 kn (56 km/h; 35 mph) Range: 4,400 nm (8,100 km) per 20 kn (37 km/h; 23 mph) Boats and amphibious assault ships carried out: 2 × hard hull inflatable boatsCompleut: Flight I: 303 Total IIA flight: 23 officers, 300 recruited sensors and processing systems: AN / SPY-1D 3D radar (Flight I,II, IIa) AN/SPY-6 AESA 3D radar (Flight III) AN/SPS-67 (V)2 surface radar AN/SPS-73 (V)212 surface radar AN/SPG-62 fire-control radar AN/S-S-S-53C sonar AN/S'R-19 Tactical Towed Sonar AN/SH-28 LAMPS III Ship Combat Bait System: AN/SL-32 (V)2 Electronic Warfare System AN/SLS-25 Nixie Torpedo Countermeasments MK 36 MOD 12 Decoy Launch System AN/SL-39 CHAFF Buoys Armament : Guns: DDG-51 to 80: 1 × 5-inch (127 mm)/54 Mk.
    [Show full text]