DOCSLIB.ORG

Calseia Annual Report 2016

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Calseia Annual Report 2016 CALSEIA ANNUAL REPORT 2016 1 2 2016 SHIFTING BATTLE LINES From the historic razor-thin 3-2 CPUC vote to save Net Energy Metering in January to the proposed Time-of-Use rate structures that threaten to undermine the economics of solar, 2016 ushered in shifting battle lines for the California solar energy market that will define 2017 and beyond. This shift in approach to slowing down the solar market from NEM to rate structures makes the work of CALSEIA ever more important – not only our work to represent the industry in the most critical decision-making forums in the state, but our ability to quickly turn around and inform you about these changes. Further, the need to remove barriers and reduce soft costs are as important as ever. Through our permitting hotline as well as our interconnection teamwork at the CPUC, CALSEIA worked throughout the year to smooth the path forward and get our contractors out in the field building the state’s clean energy future. Then comes the work to build the opportunities of the future, which includes paving the way for storage to become mainstream and getting value from the capabilities of smart inverters. Winning individual battles is great. But there is still a war of words, ideas, and policies raging in California and nothing should be taken for granted. We are your public voice working to ensure that California’s solar policies remain strong, that you remain informed, and that solar energy is increasingly relied upon as the centerpiece of a modern energy system. On behalf of the CALSEIA Board of Directors and staff, we thank you for your ongoing support. Sincerely, Ed Murray Bernadette Del Chiaro Board President Executive Director 2 BWB Solar Byers Solar Caiman Engineering Inc. OUR CalCom Solar California Solar Electric Company California Solar Electric Systems, Inc. California Solar Systems, Inc. California Solar Thermal Capital City Solar MEMBERS CED Greentech 2016 Member by Business Type Cenergy Power Center for Climate Protection Centroplan USA LLC 2016 Member by Business Type Century Roof & Solar 4% Chaolysti 4% Chico Electric 4% 4% 4% Chico Solar Works 4% Chilicon Power Chint Power Systems 5% 5% Ciel Et Terre USA Contractor, Project Developer,Contractor, Project EPC Developer, EPCCitigreen, Inc. Manufacturer CivicSolar Manufacturer Service Provider Clean Energy of America Group, Inc. Service Provider Financial Entity/Bank 12% Consultant, Designer, Engineer Clean Energy Solutions of CA Financial Entity/Bank 52% Distributor/Supplier Clean Energy Storage Inc. 12% Consultant, Designer,Nonprofit, Engineer Government, Law FirmClean Solar 52% Distributor/Supplier CleanFund Commercial PACE Capital Nonprofit, Government, Law Firm CleanTech Energy Solutions, Inc. Cleantech Law Partners Clearline Technologies 18% Coastal Constructors, Inc. Cobalt Power Systems CohnReznick LLP COLOSSUN USA Corp. 18% Community College League of California Conergy 2016 Members by Business Type Conserval Systems (SolarWall) Cosmic Solar Center for Sustainable Energy Custom Power Solar 180 Solar Power Applied Solar Energy Solutions Dahlia Greer Public Relations 4 S.T.E.L. Engineering, Inc. Apricus, Inc Darfon America Corp. 4th Day Energy APsystems Davis Wright Tremaine A-C Electric Company Aquatherm Industries, Inc. Day One Solar Above All Construction Inc. Arcadia Solar Del Sol NRG, Inc Absolutely Solar, Inc. Arise Solar Diablo Solar Services ACR Solar International, Corp. Arraycon Dividend Solar Adara Power ATE Solar Corp DJI Adroit Energy, Inc. Aurora Solar Draker Advanced Solar Solutions Inc. Avalon Battery DRH Solar and Electric Aerocompact AWS Electrical & Solar Inc. Eco Foundation Systems Inc. AET Solar Axis Solar Design Ecolibrium Solar Aeterna Energy, LLC Aztec Solar EcoVolt Finance LLC Affordable Solar Installation B & B Solar Eltropy Inc AgEnergy Systems Baker Electric Solar, Inc. ENACT Systems Inc. Air Sun Solar BannerSolar Energevity Albion Power Company, Inc. Barrier Solar Power Systems Energx Controls aleo solar Battery Systems Inc. Energy Services Alive Industries BayWa r.e. Solar Systems LLC Energy Toolbase All Terrain Solar Bland Solar and Air EnergySage All Valley Solar Inc. BlueFlame Energy Finance EnergyStars Construction Allana Buick & Bers, Inc. BMC Solar Enovative Construction AllEarth Renewables Booth Construction Enphase Energy Inc. Alpha Energy Management Inc. Bosch EnterSolar AlsoEnergy Boviet Solar USA Environmental Solar Design Alternative Energy Systems (AES Solar) Bozzuto & Company Insurance Svcs. Equisolar Altsys Solar Inc. Bright Harvest, Inc ES Electrical Construction Inc. Ameco Solar Inc Bright Power Estriatus Law, PC American Renewable Capital, Inc. BrightCurrent ET Solar Inc Ampion Brightline Defense Project Everest Solar Systems Anca Solar Inc Brighton Energy Everyday Energy Antonioli Constructuion Brooks Engineering FAFCO Apex Natural Renewable Generation, LLC BTA Solar Feather River Solar Electric APG Solar Burnham Energy Inc. Fidelity Home Energy 3 Continued on page 10 2016 Program HighlightsITC Extended FIGHTING FOR NET METERING dedicated to storage and made money that had The CPUC decision came in January, but the been reserved for future years available sooner. debate over the final tariff language continued We also added a storage company to the CALSEIA through June. The utilities attempted to expand Board of Directors and put in motion plans to hire the assessment of non-bypassable charges, limit a storage-dedicated policy advocate to the CALSEIA NEM grandfathering, and add departing load team. charges for some customers. CALSEIA fought for a THERMAL strong NEM decision and then pivoted to block the The massive leak at Aliso Canyon spurred state implementation moves by the IOUs. action to promote solar thermal technologies given TIME-OF-SANITY their large potential to reduce natural gas use in TOU rate structure took center stage as the the state. In fact, installing solar water heating on battlefield for solar shifted away from NEM. Utilities just 7% of the multi-family buildings in LA offsets and Cal-ISO proposed to move summer peak to the annual natural gas demand for withdrawals the evening hours with no grandfathering. CALSEIA from Aliso Canyon for buildings in LA. At our pushed back with load analysis and by bringing real encouragement, the state boosted CSI-Thermal stories of impacts on customers to the halls of the rebates in SoCalGas territory, and we worked with CPUC. SoCalGas to ensure the program worked for single- family homeowners. We also came excruciatingly STORAGE close to passing a $250 million statewide boost to We continued stepping up our work on energy the program for the next five years. storage in 2016. The SGIP solicitation in February PERMITTING & SOFT COST REDUCTIONS did not go smoothly and took months to sort out. Soft costs account for as much as 64% of solar’s Then the CPUC considered changes to the incentive total installed costs, according to the DOE. We structure. We successfully got 75% of the funds 4 2016 Program Highlights increased outreach efforts to help jurisdictions benefits from solar and storage is also underway. across the state implement AB 2188, the law to This will lead to development opportunities and streamline permitting and make solar cheaper will form the backbone of NEM-3. and easier for everyone. In addition, through our NEM-A BILLING permitting hotline, we addressed at least one NEM-Aggregation customers have been frustrated member permitting concern per week. CALSEIA by bills that are late, incorrect, and impossible also pressed for official national and California code to understand. CALSEIA has pushed hard to get clarifications, saving thousands of dollars for every utilities to increase staff resources and improve installation that now avoids unnecessary center-fed the billing format so that a horrible customer panel upgrades. experience doesn’t poison the market for solar. SOLAR FOR ALL We continued our efforts to expand access to INTERCONNECTION solar for all Californians. We outlined our vision CALSEIA pressed utilities to stop requiring for how to implement AB 693, a new solar rebate unnecessary grid upgrades when interconnecting program for tenants of low-income multifamily large solar systems and won approval for access housing projects, and continued to advocate for the to better data on local grid conditions that helps diversification of the market under NEM 2.0. estimate interconnection costs. MUNI NEM All of our efforts to protect NEM at the CPUC CSI-THERMAL DOMESTIC WATER HEATING unfortunately have no impact on the state’s 40+ Thanks to CALSEIA’s efforts to set the CSI Thermal publicly owned utilities. Imperial Irrigation District program’s rebates at levels that work for the chronically low natural gas prices, installations have increased with larger (IID), for example, pulled the plug on NEM in monthly natural gas reductions since rebates were fixed in February stranding 1200+ solar customers, many February of 2015. with solar on their roofs awaiting interconnection. CALSEIA fought tooth and nail and won a concession, negotiated by the state legislature, forcing IID to give full NEM status to the vast majority of these solar customers. GRID MODERNIZATION Issues related to grid modernization consumed a lot of brainpower. Utilities are improving their analysis of the hosting capacity of the grid, which will lead to a better interconnection process. An overhaul of the method for measuring the grid 5 2 - CALSEIA LEADERSHIP Officers Board Members President John Berdner, Enphase Ed Murray, Aztec Solar
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2015-SVTC-Solar-Scorecard.Pdf
    A PROJECT OF THE SILICON VALLEY TOXICS COALITION 2015 SOLAR SCORECARD ‘‘ www.solarscorecard.com ‘‘ SVTC’s Vision The Silicon Valley Toxics Coalition (SVTC) believes that we still have time to ensure that the PV sector is safe The PV industry’s rapid growth makes for the environment, workers, and communities. SVTC it critical that all solar companies envisions a safe and sustainable solar PV industry that: maintain the highest sustainability standards. 1) Takes responsibility for the environmental and health impacts of its products throughout their life- cycles, including adherence to a mandatory policy for ‘‘The Purpose responsible recycling. The Scorecard is a resource for consumers, institutional purchasers, investors, installers, and anyone who wants 2) Implements and monitors equitable environmental to purchase PV modules from responsible product and labor standards throughout product supply chains. stewards. The Scorecard reveals how companies perform on SVTC’s sustainability and social justice benchmarks 3) Pursues innovative approaches to reducing and to ensure that the PV manufacturers protect workers, work towards eliminating toxic chemicals in PV mod- communities, and the environment. The PV industry’s ule manufacturing. continued growth makes it critical to take action now to reduce the use of toxic chemicals, develop responsible For over three decades, SVTC has been a leader in recycling systems, and protect workers throughout glob- encouraging electronics manufacturers to take lifecycle al PV supply chains. Many PV companies want to pro- responsibility for their products. This includes protecting duce truly clean and green energy systems and are taking workers from toxic exposure and preventing hazardous steps to implement more sustainable practices.
    [Show full text]
  • Lessons from the Solar Leasing Boom in California
    Improving Solar Policy: Lessons from the solar leasing boom in California Climate Policy Initiative Andrew Hobbs Elinor Benami Uday Varadarajan Brendan Pierpont July 2013 A CPI Report Acknowledgements The authors thank the following organizations and professionals for their collaboration and input: Marzia Zafar and Robert Kinosian of CPUC, Michael Mendelsohn, Carolyn Davidson,and Easan Drury of NREL; Varun Rai and Ben Sig- rin of University of Texas – Austin; Jorge Medina and John Stanton of Solar City; Holly Gordon and Walker Wright of Sun Run, Darren Deffner of SEPA; Philip Shen of Roth Capital; Kevin Hurst of the U.S. Office of Science and Technol- ogy Policy, James Fine of the Environmental Defense Fund, Judson Jaffe of the U.S. Treasury; and Eric Gimon of the Vote Solar Initiative. The perspectives expressed here are CPI’s own. Finally the authors would like to acknowledge inputs, comments and internal review from CPI staff: David Nelson, Jeff Deason, Kath Rowley, Rodney Boyd, Wenjuan Dong, Tim Varga, Elysha Rom-Povolo, and Ruby Barcklay. Descriptors Sector Renewable Energy Region U.S. Keywords Solar; PV; leasing; business models; renewable energy Contact Andrew Hobbs [email protected] About CPI Climate Policy Initiative is a team of analysts and advisors that works to improve the most important energy and land use policies around the world, with a particular focus on finance. An independent organization supported by a grant from the Open Society Foundations, CPI works in places that provide the most potential for policy impact including Brazil, China, Europe, India, Indonesia, and the United States. Copyright © 2013 Climate Policy Initiative www.climatepolicyinitiative.org All rights reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • Lsoar Value Chain Value Chain
    Solar Private companies in black Public companies in blue Followed by the founding date of companies less than 15 years old value chain (1 of 2) This value chain publication contains information gathered and summarized mainly from Lux Research and a variety of other public sources that we believe to be accurate at the time of ppggyublication. The information is for general guidance only and not intended to be a substitute for detailed research or the exercise of professional judgment. Neither EYGM Limited nor any other member of the global Ernst & Young organization nor Lux Research can accept responsibility for loss to any person relying on this publication. Materials and equipment Components and products Balance of system and installations Crystalline silicon photovoltaic GCL Silicon, China (2006); LDK Solar, China (2005); MEMC, US; Renewable Energy Corporation ASA, Norway; SolarWorld AG, Germany (1998) Bosch Solar Energy, Germany (2000); Canadian Solar, Canada/China (2001); Jinko Solar, China (2006); Kyocera, Japan; Sanyo, Japan; SCHOTT Solar, Germany (2002); Solarfun, China (2004); Tianwei New Energy Holdings Co., China; Trina Solar, China (1997); Yingli Green Energy, China (1998); BP Solar, US; Conergy, Germany (1998); Eging Photovoltaic, China SOLON, Germany (1997) Daqo Group, China; M. Setek, Japan; ReneSola, China (2003); Wacker, Germany Hyundai Heavy Industries,,; Korea; Isofoton,,p Spain ; JA Solar, China (();2005); LG Solar Power,,; Korea; Mitsubishi Electric, Japan; Moser Baer Photo Voltaic, India (2005); Motech, Taiwan; Samsung
    [Show full text]
  • WARN Report Summary by Received Date 07/01/2019 - 06/30/2020 State Fiscal Year No
    WARN Report Summary by Received Date 07/01/2019 - 06/30/2020 State Fiscal Year No. Of Notice Date Effective Date Received Date Company City County Employees Layoff/Closure 06/10/2020 06/09/2020 06/30/2020 Harbor Bay Club, Inc Alameda Alameda County 80 Layoff Temporary 03/20/2020 03/20/2020 06/30/2020 MD2 Industries, LLC Long Beach Los Angeles County 109 Closure Temporary 06/30/2020 08/21/2020 06/30/2020 NBCUniversal Media, LLC - Digital Lab Unit Universal City Los Angeles County 28 Layoff Temporary 04/22/2020 06/22/2020 06/30/2020 House of Blues Anaheim Anaheim Orange County 8 Closure Temporary 06/29/2020 08/01/2020 06/30/2020 ADESA California, LLC dba ADESA/AFC Los Mira Loma Riverside County 71 Layoff Permanent Angeles 06/17/2020 06/17/2020 06/30/2020 K&N Engineering, Inc. Riverside Riverside County 44 Layoff Permanent 06/29/2020 07/28/2020 06/30/2020 Benchmark Arrowhead, LLC dba Lake Lake Arrowhead San Bernardino County 114 Layoff Permanent Arrowhead Resort and Spa 06/18/2020 07/06/2020 06/30/2020 HOWMET Aerospace Fontana San Bernardino County 75 Layoff Temporary 06/18/2020 06/16/2020 06/30/2020 Bahia Resort Hotel San Diego San Diego County 47 Layoff Permanent 06/18/2020 06/16/2020 06/30/2020 Catamaran Resort Hotel and Spa San Diego San Diego County 46 Layoff Permanent 06/18/2020 06/16/2020 06/30/2020 The Lodge Torrey Pines La Jolla San Diego County 84 Layoff Permanent 06/18/2020 06/18/2020 06/30/2020 Bahia Resort Hotel San Diego San Diego County 33 Layoff Temporary 06/18/2020 06/18/2020 06/30/2020 Catamaran Resort Hotel and Spa San Diego San Diego County 33 Layoff Temporary 06/18/2020 06/18/2020 06/30/2020 The Lodge Torrey Pines La Jolla San Diego County 37 Layoff Temporary 06/08/2020 03/30/2020 06/30/2020 SmartCareMD Escondido San Diego County 38 Layoff Permanent 06/29/2020 08/31/2020 06/30/2020 Stryker Employment Company Menlo Park San Mateo County 33 Layoff Permanent 06/29/2020 08/29/2020 06/30/2020 Nitto, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Just Energy Selects Sungevity to Grow Solar Footprint in Leading U.S
    JUST ENERGY SELECTS SUNGEVITY TO GROW SOLAR FOOTPRINT IN LEADING U.S. MARKETS --Energy Solutions Leader with Nearly Two Million Customers to Leverage Sungevity’s Marketing and Sales Platform-- OAKLAND, CA, and TORONTO, ONTARIO – (November 30, 2016) - Sungevity, Inc., a technology company whose platform enables the sale and installation of solar energy systems to residential and commercial customers in the United States and internationally, and Just Energy Group Inc. (NYSE:JE, TSX:JE), an energy management solutions provider specializing in electricity and natural gas commodities, energy efficiency solutions, and renewable energy options, today announced a partnership aimed at accelerating solar adoption in several of the leading U.S. solar markets. Commencing in January 2017, Just Energy will leverage Sungevity’s industry-leading platform to sell Sungevity Energy Systems to customers in California, Massachusetts, New Jersey and New York, four of the top ten solar markets1 in the nation according to the Solar Energy Industry Association (SEIA). Just Energy services nearly two million customers in North America and the UK with energy solutions, including green energy product options and energy efficient programs that empower customers to support a cleaner environment. Sungevity directly services solar customers across the U.S. and Europe, and also leverages its innovative platform with a broad range of strategic partners to rapidly scale its business. The two companies share a customer-centric approach to business and will work together through this partnership to provide residential customers with best-in-class solar products and services. “As a proven leader in energy management solutions, we were looking for the best partner to scale our solar offering,” said Deb Merril, President and Co-CEO at Just Energy.
    [Show full text]
  • Tesla, Inc. Form 10-K Annual Report Filed 2017-03-01
    SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION FORM 10-K Annual report pursuant to section 13 and 15(d) Filing Date: 2017-03-01 | Period of Report: 2016-12-31 SEC Accession No. 0001564590-17-003118 (HTML Version on secdatabase.com) FILER Tesla, Inc. Mailing Address Business Address 3500 DEER CREEK RD 3500 DEER CREEK RD CIK:1318605| IRS No.: 912197729 | State of Incorp.:DE | Fiscal Year End: 1231 PALO ALTO CA 94070 PALO ALTO CA 94070 Type: 10-K | Act: 34 | File No.: 001-34756 | Film No.: 17655025 650-681-5000 SIC: 3711 Motor vehicles & passenger car bodies Copyright © 2017 www.secdatabase.com. All Rights Reserved. Please Consider the Environment Before Printing This Document UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K (Mark One) ☒ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 OR ☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from to Commission File Number: 001-34756 Tesla, Inc. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Delaware 91-2197729 (State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer incorporation or organization) Identification No.) 3500 Deer Creek Road Palo Alto, California 94304 (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) (650) 681-5000 (Registrant’s telephone number, including area code) Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Title of each class Name of each exchange on which registered Common Stock, $0.001 par value The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
    [Show full text]
  • Solar Photovoltaic Manufacturing: Industry Trends, Global Competition, Federal Support
    U.S. Solar Photovoltaic Manufacturing: Industry Trends, Global Competition, Federal Support Michaela D. Platzer Specialist in Industrial Organization and Business January 27, 2015 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov R42509 U.S. Solar PV Manufacturing: Industry Trends, Global Competition, Federal Support Summary Every President since Richard Nixon has sought to increase U.S. energy supply diversity. Job creation and the development of a domestic renewable energy manufacturing base have joined national security and environmental concerns as reasons for promoting the manufacturing of solar power equipment in the United States. The federal government maintains a variety of tax credits and targeted research and development programs to encourage the solar manufacturing sector, and state-level mandates that utilities obtain specified percentages of their electricity from renewable sources have bolstered demand for large solar projects. The most widely used solar technology involves photovoltaic (PV) solar modules, which draw on semiconducting materials to convert sunlight into electricity. By year-end 2013, the total number of grid-connected PV systems nationwide reached more than 445,000. Domestic demand is met both by imports and by about 75 U.S. manufacturing facilities employing upwards of 30,000 U.S. workers in 2014. Production is clustered in a few states including California, Ohio, Oregon, Texas, and Washington. Domestic PV manufacturers operate in a dynamic, volatile, and highly competitive global market now dominated by Chinese and Taiwanese companies. China alone accounted for nearly 70% of total solar module production in 2013. Some PV manufacturers have expanded their operations beyond China to places like Malaysia, the Philippines, and Mexico.
    [Show full text]
  • Expanding the Photovoltaic Supply Chain in the United States: Opportunities and Challenges
    Expanding the Photovoltaic Supply Chain in the United States: Opportunities and Challenges Brittany L. Smith and Robert Margolis NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy Technical Report Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy NREL/TP-6A20-73363 Operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC July 2019 This report is available at no cost from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) at www.nrel.gov/publications. Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308 Expanding the Photovoltaic Supply Chain in the United States: Opportunities and Challenges Brittany L. Smith and Robert Margolis Suggested Citation Smith, Brittany L., and Robert Margolis. (2019). Expanding the Photovoltaic Supply Chain in the United States: Opportunities and Challenges. Golden, CO: National Renewable Energy Laboratory. NREL/TP-6A20-73363. https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy19osti/73363.pdf. NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy Technical Report Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy NREL/TP-6A20-73363 Operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC July 2019 This report is available at no cost from the National Renewable Energy National Renewable Energy Laboratory Laboratory (NREL) at www.nrel.gov/publications. 15013 Denver West Parkway Golden, CO 80401 Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308 303-275-3000 • www.nrel.gov NOTICE This work was authored by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, operated by Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC, for the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) under Contract No. DE-AC36- 08GO28308. Funding provided by the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Solar Energy Technologies Office.
    [Show full text]
  • Solar in the Southland
    Solar in the Southland The Benefits of Achieving 20 Percent Local Solar Power in Los Angeles by 2020 Solar in the Southland The Benefits of Achieving 20 Percent Local Solar Power in Los Angeles by 2020 Environment California Research & Policy Center Michelle Kinman, Environment California Research & Policy Center Spring 2013 Acknowledgments Environment California Research & Policy Center would like to thank Cecilia Aguillon, CALSEIA; James Brennan, Open Neighborhoods; Susannah Churchill, Vote Solar; Evan Gillespie, Sierra Club; Craig Lewis, Clean Coalition; Nehzat Motallebi, California Air Resources Board; Hilary Pearson, Sungevity; and Mark Smith, Solar Forward for their insightful comments on drafts of this report. Additional thanks to Scott Briasco, LADWP; JR DeShazo, UCLA Luskin Center for Innovation; Joe O’Hagan and John Maulbetsch, California Energy Commission; and Earl Landberg, Dave Mehl and John Swanton, Cali- fornia Air Resources Board for guidance on specific data in this report. Finally, thanks to Bernadette Del Chiaro at Environment California Research & Policy Center, Rob Sargent at Environment America Research & Policy Center and Tony Dutzik, Elizabeth Ridlington and especially Travis Madsen at Frontier Group for guidance and editorial assistance. The generous support of the Arntz Family Foundation, Energy Foundation, Fred Gellert Family Foundation, and the Tilia Foundation made this report possible. The opinions expressed in this report are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of our funders or those who provided review. Any factual errors are strictly the responsibility of the author. © 2013 Environment California Research & Policy Center Environment California Research & Policy Center is a 501(c)(3) organization. We are dedicated to protecting California’s air, water and open spaces.
    [Show full text]
  • Residential Solar+Storage?
    Volume 10, Number 5 G June 2017 What’s Holding Back Residential Solar+Storage? A national lab provides insight into energy storage pricing and adoption barriers. page 12 Grid Impacts New methods help estimate how solar affects major U.S. electricity markets. page 16 Resource Assessment Accurately predicting project performance can make a big difference for developers. page 20 a_1_SI_1706.indd 1 5/26/17 10:50 AM b_2_11.28_36_SI_1706.inddLG_Spread_1706.indd 1 2 5/25/17 1:03 PM 5/19/17 12:04 PM LG_Spread_1706.indd 1 b_2_11.28_36_SI_1706.indd 3 5/19/175/25/17 12:04 1:04 PMPM ✹ Contents R Features Home Solar+Storage 12 12 What’s Holding Back Residential Solar+Storage? The National Renewable Energy Laboratory gauges the costs of combining residential solar with energy storage, as well as discusses current adoption barriers. Grid Impacts 16 Making Sense Of Solar: New Methods To Assess Penetration And Oversupply Risks Examining three operational variables can provide insight into the impacts of solar in major U.S. electricity markets. Resource Assessment 20 The Importance Of Accurate Performance Predictions 16 Several best practices can help developers reduce uncertainty in pre-construction solar resource assessments. Project Development 24 Developing Projects For Higher Education Colleges and universities have a growing appetite for on-campus solar projects, which require some unique development considerations. 24 20 ✹ Departments 6 Sun Dial 8 New & Noteworthy 10 Products & Technology 28 Projects & Contracts 32 Policy Watch 34 Sundown 4 Solar
    [Show full text]
  • RE-Powering America's Land Initiative: Project Tracking Matrix April 2016
    RE-Powering America’s Land Initiative: April 2016 Project Tracking Matrix The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) recognizes the overall environmental RE-Powering America’s benefit of siting renewable energy projects on contaminated properties. Through Land Initiative the RE-Powering America’s Land Initiative, EPA is encouraging renewable energy development on current and formerly contaminated lands, landfills, and mine sites To provide information on renewable energy on when such development is aligned with the community’s vision for the site. contaminated land projects not currently appearing Using publically available information, RE-Powering maintains a list of completed in this document, email [email protected]. renewable energy installations on contaminated sites and landfills. To date, the To receive updates, newsletters, and other RE-Powering Initiative has identified 179 renewable energy installations on 171 information about the RE-Powering program, contaminated lands, landfills, and mine sites1, with a cumulative installed capacity of click the banner below. just over 1,124 megawatts (MW) and consistent growth in total installations since the inception of the RE-Powering Initiative. Approximately 60% of these installations are Subscribe large-scale systems with a project capacity of 1 MW or more, either exporting energy EPA’s RE-Powering Listserv onto the utility grid or offsetting onsite energy demands. This document provides summary statistics of known installations and discusses emerging trends. In addition to the completed sites listed here, EPA is tracking more than 50 renewable energy projects on contaminated or disturbed properties in various stages of planning, approval, or construction. These include a 1.1-MW solar project under construction on a Meriden, CT landfill; a 2.25-MW solar project under construction on a coal ash landfill in Beloit, WI; and an 18.6-MW solar installation underway at the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Seeds of Solar Innovation: How a Nation Can Grow a Competitive Advantage by Donny Holaschutz
    The Seeds of Solar Innovation: How a Nation can Grow a Competitive Advantage by Donny Holaschutz B.A. Hispanic Studies (2004), University of Texas at Austin B.S. Aerospace Engineering (2004), University of Texas at Austin M.S.E Aerospace Engineering (2007), University of Texas at Austin Submitted to the System Design and Management Program In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Engineering and Management ARCHIVES MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE at the OF TECHNOLOGY Massachusetts Institute of Technology February 2012 © 2012 Donny Holaschutz. All rights reserved The author hereby grants to MIT permission to reproduce and to distribute publicly paper and electronic copies of this thesis document in whole or in part in any medium now known or hereqfter reated. Signed by Author: Donny Holaschutz Engineering Systems Division and Sloan School of Management January 20, 2012 Certified by: James M. Utterback, Thesis Supervisor David . McGrath jr (1959) Professor of Management and Innovation and Professor of neering SysemsIT oan School of Management Accepted by: Patrick C.Hale Director otS ystem Design and Management Program THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Table of Contents Fig u re List ...................................................................................................................................................... 5 T ab le List........................................................................................................................................................7 Executive
    [Show full text]