DOCSLIB.ORG

Ardmore Shipping Corporation Annual 2017Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ardmore Shipping Corporation Annual 2017Report ARDMORE SHIPPING CORPORATION ANNUAL 2017REPORT ARDMORE SHIPPING CORPORATION 2017 ANNUAL REPORT Contents Our Company and Strategy 03 Letter from the Chairman 05 Letter from the CEO 07 Our Philosophy 11 Directors & Senior Management 13 Our Fleet 17 Ardmore’s Role in the Oil Value Chain 19 Corporate & Social Responsibility 21 Form 20F 23 | 02 Our Company Ardmore Shipping owns and operates a fleet of mid-size product and chemical tankers. We provide seaborne transportation of petroleum products and chemicals worldwide to oil majors, national oil companies, oil and chemical traders, and chemical companies, with our modern, fuel- efficient fleet of tankers. Ardmore’s core strategy is to develop a modern, high-quality fleet of product and chemical tankers, build key long-term commercial relationships, maintain our cost advantage in assets, operations and overhead, while creating significant synergies and economies of scale as the Company grows. We provide our services to customers through voyage charters, commercial pools and time charters enjoying close working relationships with key commercial and technical management partners. We view the continued development of these relationships as crucial to our longterm success. Ardmore strategy Long-Term Value Creation Disciplined Capital Allocation Conservative Balance Sheet High-Quality Fleet Transparent Corporate Structure Focus Mid-Size Product Tankers Fleet Performance and Service Excellence Voyage Optimization Fuel Efficiency and Emissions Reduction Low Cost Structure Assets Acquired at Cyclical Lows Operational Cost Advantage Low Corporate Overhead Disciplined Investment 03 | 04 Fellow Shareholders, strengthens, our shareholders will benefit from Ardmore’s low-cost structure, modern fleet and continued growth in revenue days Over the course of 2017, Ardmore in 2018. continued to make substantial progress across several strategic Disciplined capital allocation, astute market timing and optimized cost of capital are priorities focused on creating critical components in creating long-term long-term value for all shareholder value in the shipping sector. stakeholders. The Company Ardmore continued to capitalize on softer market conditions through the acquisition THE CHAIRMAN LETTER FROM maintains a strong balance sheet of a high-quality MR at an attractive price, and liquidity profile, designed financed with a highly efficient, low- cost lease structure. The Company also to allow us to capitalize on expanded per share earnings power through opportunistic growth and value a repurchase of 4% of the outstanding creation as accretive common shares at a discount to net asset value as part of the GA Holdings LLC opportunities arise. secondary offering. The offering further diversifies the shareholder base with Additionally, Ardmore continues to invest increased free float and share trading in the organization to further enhance its volume, which benefits all shareholders. top-tier operational performance. Continued successful execution of these principles Sound corporate governance and has allowed us to strengthen our value transparency remain paramount to the proposition to all stakeholders, and has Company, and our management team positioned Ardmore for continued success remains fully aligned with our shareholders. heading into 2018. Our internal management structure precludes related party and affiliated Ardmore benefits from a focused and transactions, and management bonus and consistent strategy, strong commercial and equity incentive plans are tied to shareholder technical operations, and an adherence returns. These corporate governance to disciplined capital allocation. Our team principles are core to our philosophy of continues to pursue operational excellence value creation, and we are proud that these and has developed numerous initiatives practices continue to be recognized and set focused on improving quality and efficiency the standard in the industry. to our customers. The newly established technical management joint venture, Looking forward, we are building on our operating under Ardmore’s integrated accomplishments and driving long-term organizational structure, will further shareholder value in a dynamic market. enhance our service offering, tighten risk We own a modern, high-quality fleet built management, and enhance our earnings at leading yards and designed for optimal potential. commercial flexibility and fuel efficiency, thereby enhancing our earnings profile while Ardmore’s overhead per ship remains reducing our carbon footprint. Ardmore amongst the lowest across our peer group, has built a high-performance, integrated and is supported by our long-term and commercial and operating platform and is consistent focus of building a modern fleet well positioned to deliver industry-leading of similar ship types. As the charter-market results in an expected improving charter ANNUAL REPORT 2017 market with an increasingly attractive multi- year supply-demand outlook. Once again, we appreciate the strong support we have received from our shareholders, financiers, customers and business partners. On behalf of the Board of Directors, I thank you for the confidence you have placed in our Company. Reginald L. Jones III Chairman Ardmore Shipping Corporation 4 05 | 06 Dear Shareholders strength as well as periods of soft chartering conditions. Hurricane Harvey proved to be particularly disruptive, shuttering 5 million It is my pleasure to report on the barrels of US refining capacity and reducing seaborne product flows. The effect was a performance of Ardmore Shipping sustained period of lower than expected Corporation for the year ended charter rates in September, October, and November as cargo volumes returned and December 31, 2017. tanker markets gradually improved. 2017 proved to be a challenging year for Oil demand remained strong in 2017, growing THE CEO LETTER FROM the product tanker market, with elevated oil 1.5 million barrels or 1.6% year on year. inventories curtailing trading activity and According to PIRA Energy, oil inventories petroleum product flows. In spite of market declined 370 million barrels during the year, conditions, Ardmore remained focused on aided by robust demand and widespread executing its strategy of delivering superior refinery outages, and are now back within shareholder returns through the cycle. During range of 2014 levels. Overall, despite 2017, we took advantage of the soft market challenging market conditions, product by acquiring a high-quality secondhand MR tanker demand continued to grow, with at an exceptionally low price, while at the seaborne product volumes increasing 2.6% same time maintaining a focus on operational to 24.1 million barrels per day. Looking and chartering performance, cost control forward, we expect demand growth to revert and balance sheet strength. Additionally, the to historic CAGR of 4.3% recorded over the Company completed a highly accretive share past decade. repurchase at a steep discount to net asset value as part of GA Holdings LLC’s secondary Commercial and operational performance offering; Ardmore shares are now widely Ardmore, at its core, is focused on held with no share overhang and improved operations and customer service. During trading liquidity. 2017 we successfully completed several key initiatives to further enhance the Refined product inventory overhang Company’s commercial and operational curtailed trading activity during 2017 capabilities to improve performance. Since The refined product market has experienced inception, Ardmore has maintained a close low levels of trading activity for the past relationship with its crew and technical 18 months, largely attributed to elevated managers and in October we established inventory levels, which reached a peak a joint venture arrangement with Anglo in 2016 as a consequence of increasing Eastern Ship Management Limited to oil production and collapsing prices. This increase our connectivity with our crew, had a softening effect on product tanker improve operational risk management and markets as onshore inventory reduction took further enhance the interface between precedence over seaborne shipments, while chartering and operations. At the same also reducing oil pricing volatility and oil time, our operations team continues to be traders’ ability to trade profitably. at the forefront of new developments in fuel efficiency and service excellence, utilising These short-term oil market dynamics have the latest technological developments offset otherwise strong underlying demand and industry-leading practices, including fundamentals and falling vessel supply. advanced weather routing tools and real- Outside elevated inventories, during 2017 time voyage data analysis to optimize there were periods of both charter rate efficiency. This ensures a consistently high- quality service offering, while maximizing Frontline in operation; these vessels were cost efficiency and reducing carbon acquired at a highly attractive price, which emissions. We also established an internal has not been matched and contributed $3.0 MR pool, providing a footprint to enhance million in net income in 2017. commercial performance gains. In November, our main shareholder GA We had a very successful year on operating Holdings LLC sold their remaining holdings expenses and drydockings, with both coming in Ardmore through a secondary offering. in below budget and remaining among the The timing of the exit and market conditions lowest across the industry - a testament provided a unique
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Legal and Economic Analysis of Tramp Maritime Services
    EU Report COMP/2006/D2/002 LEGAL AND ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF TRAMP MARITIME SERVICES Submitted to: European Commission Competition Directorate-General (DG COMP) 70, rue Joseph II B-1000 BRUSSELS Belgium For the Attention of Mrs Maria José Bicho Acting Head of Unit D.2 "Transport" Prepared by: Fearnley Consultants AS Fearnley Consultants AS Grev Wedels Plass 9 N-0107 OSLO, Norway Phone: +47 2293 6000 Fax: +47 2293 6110 www.fearnresearch.com In Association with: 22 February 2007 LEGAL AND ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF TRAMP MARITIME SERVICES LEGAL AND ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF TRAMP MARITIME SERVICES DISCLAIMER This report was produced by Fearnley Consultants AS, Global Insight and Holman Fenwick & Willan for the European Commission, Competition DG and represents its authors' views on the subject matter. These views have not been adopted or in any way approved by the European Commission and should not be relied upon as a statement of the European Commission's or DG Competition's views. The European Commission does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this report, nor does it accept responsibility for any use made thereof. © European Communities, 2007 LEGAL AND ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF TRAMP MARITIME SERVICES ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The consultants would like to thank all those involved in the compilation of this Report, including the various members of their staff (in particular Lars Erik Hansen of Fearnleys, Maria Bertram of Global Insight, Maria Hempel, Guy Main and Cécile Schlub of Holman Fenwick & Willan) who devoted considerable time and effort over and above the working day to the project, and all others who were consulted and whose knowledge and experience of the industry proved invaluable.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Maritime Transport 2020 37
    2 The present chapter focuses on key developments related to the supply of maritime transport during this past year. It also assesses the early impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the supply of maritime transport services and industries and discusses the responses, lessons learned and possible implications of the pandemic in terms of forces shaping supply and the industry’s long-term goal of decarbonization. The pandemic has had a significant impact on the shipping industry. On the one hand, lockdowns and factory closures gradually affected demand for maritime transport, due to reduced cargo volumes (see chapter 1). On the other hand, safety measures applied to contain the spread of the virus, such as lockdowns and travel restrictions, affected the movement of maritime transport workers and procedural changes introduced in ports, and induced operational disruptions in the supply of maritime transport. These prompted changes in shipping operations and requests for government support in the sector. They made the industry reflect on ways to enhance resilience of the sector to future shocks. This chapter reviews world fleet developments such as MARITIME annual fleet growth, changes to the structure and age of the fleet. It considers selected segments of the maritime TRANSPORT supply chain, such as shipbuilding, ship recycling, ship ownership, ship registration and the maritime workforce, SERVICES AND emphasizing the impacts of the pandemic on maritime INFRASTRUCTURE transport and marine manufacturing industries and on the supply of shipping services. SUPPLY It also examines the impact of the pandemic on the container, dry bulk and tanker freight markets; government responses to support shipping; and industry prospects, in particular with regard to accelerated digitalization and the prioritization of environmental sustainability.
    [Show full text]
  • TERMS and CONDITIONS DATED 2010-05-01 Revised December 2014 (§39)
    PREEM AB 1 PREEM AB CHARTERPARTY TERMS AND CONDITIONS DATED 2010-05-01 Revised December 2014 (§39) SECTION 1 1. Basic Provisions 2. Worldscale and Overage 3. Misrepresentation 4. I T F Clause 5. Safe Port/Berth 6. Deviation 7. Agency 8. Expected to Arrive 9. Notice of Readiness 10. Time Bar 11. Statement of Facts 12. Calculation of laytime 13. Weather and seagoing clause 14. Retention 15. Letter of Indemnity and Invocation of Short Form Undertaking 16. Port Authority's Instruction 17. Competent Crew 18. Crew's Duties 19. Bunkers Onboard 20. Charterers Inspection 21. Cleaning 22. Cargo Temperature at Loading/Heating 23. Pumping 24. Closed Loading 25. Insurance 26. Vessel Certification 27. Remaining on Board 28. Pollution Clause 29. P&I Insurance 30. Drug and Alcohol Clause 31. ITOPF Clause 32. Small Claims Arbitration 33. Address Commission 34. Logbooks 35. Vessel Vetting Clause 36. Early Loading Clause 37. ISPS Clause, International Ship & Port Facility Safety Code 38. Charterers Mail 39. Accidents to Vessel and / or Cargo 40. Document of Compliance / ISM Clause, International Safety Management Code 41. Administration Clause PREEM AB 2 SECTION 2 A. Crude Oil Washing B. Inert Gas C. Speed Clause D. Lightering Execution Clause E. Tank Stripping F. Lightering Stability G. Arab Clause H. Early Departure Clause I. Hydrogen Sulphide Clause SECTION 1 1 The clauses hereinafter are, to the extent they are not added to, deleted or otherwise 2 changed by mutual consent, deemed incorporated into the ASBATANKVOY 3 Charterparty part 1 section M or otherwise, as appropriate, deemed incorporated into 4 such other Charterparty form the parties have agreed shall govern the charter.
    [Show full text]
  • Team Tankers Management AS
    Team Tankers Management AS Formerly Eitzen Chemical ASA Annual Report 2014 Table of Contents Description of the Company ................................................................................................................................... 4 Introduction to the chemical tanker market .......................................................................................................... 9 Board of Directors’ report .................................................................................................................................... 14 Statement of responsibility .................................................................................................................................. 22 Consolidated Income Statement .......................................................................................................................... 23 Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income ............................................................................................ 24 Consolidated Statement of Financial Position ...................................................................................................... 25 Consolidated Cash Flow Statement ...................................................................................................................... 26 Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity ..................................................................................................... 27 Notes to the Financial Statements ......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Volume Contracts of Affreightment – Some Features and Principles
    Volume Contracts of Affreightment – Some Features and Principles Lars Gorton 1 Introduction ………………………………………………………………….…. 62 1.1 General Background ……………………………………………………… 62 1.2 Some Contractual Points …………..……………………………………... 62 1.3 Frame Agreements ………………………………………………………... 64 1.4 Some General Points Related to Distributorship Agreements and Volume Contracts ………………………………………. 66 1.5 Some Further Overriding Points ……………………………………….…. 67 2 Contract Forms ………………………………………………………………… 68 3 Law, Contract and Terminology ……………………………………………… 69 4 The SMC Rules on Volume Contracts ……………………………………..…. 70 5 Characteristics of COA’s ……………………………………………………… 71 6 The Generic Nature of the COA ………………………………………………. 72 7 Some of the Parameters of the COA ………………………...……………….. 76 7.1 The Ships Involved Under the Volume Contract ………………………… 76 7.2 Time Elements in Connection with COA’s ………………………………. 76 7.3 Cargo and Cargo Quantity and Planning of Voyages ………………….… 77 8 Breach and Consequences of Breach …………………………………………. 78 8.1 Generally, Best Efforts and Cooperation …………………………………. 78 8.2 Consequences of the Owners’s Breach …………………………………... 78 8.3 Consequences of the Charterer’s Breach …………………………………. 78 9 Some Comparisons with Distributorship Agreements in English Law ….…. 78 10 Some COA Cases Involving “Evenly spread” ……………………………….. 82 10.1 “Evenly spread” …………………………………………………………... 82 10.2 Mitigation of Damages …………………………………………………… 85 11 Freight, Demurrage and Similar ……………………………………………… 88 11.1 General Points ………..…………………………………………………... 88 11.2 Freight Level ……………………………………………………………..
    [Show full text]
  • The Master's Degree Program in Technical Management Middle- Or Top-Level Technical Supervisors
    ROBERT J. THOMPSON and ALEXANDER KOSSIAKOFF THE MASTER' S DEGREE PROGRAM IN TECHNICAL MANAGEMENT The JHU/ APL Technical Management Program is designed to help scientists and engineers become successful managers. Management is presented as an art that the student learns by solving problems in a simulated management role under the tutelage of experienced managers, as well as by lectures, reading, and class discussion. This article presents the curriculum and describes the distinctive features of the in­ structional approach. INTRODUCTION A graduate program in The Johns Hopkins Univer­ course is taught by two instructors and several guest lec­ sity G. W. C. Whiting School of Engineering leading turers, exposing the students to a broad range of ex­ to the degree of Master of Science in Technical Manage­ periences and iewpoints. ment is now in its ninth year at the JHU/ APL Educa­ The students are generally mature scientists and en­ tion Center. The program is also offered at the Uni er­ gineers who ha e fi e or more years of professional ex­ sity's new Montgomery County Center. Its objecti e is perience and who have recently made or expect to make to assist professional scientists and engineers, who ei­ the transition into management. They are drawn from ther have already assumed management responsibilities a broad cross section of the neighboring technical com­ or who aspire to a future career in management, in de­ munity and show considerable diversity in education, veloping their skills for effectively managing technical work experience, and viewpoint. projects and directing the efforts of technical profession­ als.
    [Show full text]
  • Shipping Management Simulation Game for Teaching and Learning in Higher Education: a Quasi-Experimental Study
    Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction: Vol. 16 (No. 2) Disember 2019: 155-186 155 How to cite this article: Mohd Radzi, S. H., Tan, W. H., & Yusoff Shipping Management Simulation Game for Teaching and Learning in Higher Education: A Quasi-Experimental Study. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 16(2), 155-186. SHIPPING MANAGEMENT SIMULATION GAME FOR TEACHING AND LEARNING IN HIGHER EDUCATION: A QUASI- EXPERIMENTAL STUDY 1Shanizan Herman Mohd Radzi, Wee Hoe Tan & Amri Yusoff School of Quantitative Sciences, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia 1,2&3Faculty of Art, Computing and Creative Industry Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Malaysia 1Coresponding author: [email protected] Received: 28/2/2019 Revised: 8/10/2019 Accepted: 15/10/2019 Published:24/12/2019 ABSTRACT Purpose – This study examines the effects of a simulation board game for teaching and learning shipping management in higher education. A framework of comprehensive shipping operations is developed according to the syllabus of the Shipping Management course at Universiti Utara Malaysia. The course core content in the game covers two main services—liner services and tramp services in the shipping industry. Methodology – A quasi-experimental research design was adopted to measure the effectiveness of the board game in giving students some understanding about shipping operations. Data were gathered from a sample of 73 undergraduate students enrolled in a Shipping Management course, using a non-equivalent control group design. The data were analysed using the McNemar Test to determine the level of understanding in shipping operations. Findings – It was found that using the board game in learning activities contributed to the improvement of students’ knowledge 156 Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction: Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • An Example of Service Intermediaries in the Maritime Industry Agnieszka Nowinska CBS INO [email protected]
    Paper to be presented at the DRUID Academy conference in Rebild, Aalborg, Denmark on January 21-23, 2015 Opening the Black Box of Intermediation: an example of Service intermediaries in the Maritime Industry Agnieszka Nowinska CBS INO [email protected] Abstract Business model innovation and strategic use of relational capital: shipping intermediaries as an example Agnieszka Nowinska Copenhagen Business School Year of enrolment: 2014. Expected end: 2017. Email: [email protected] This paper attempts to answer how external environmental factors affect intermediating firms within the maritime industry â?? the middlemen that plays a very important role in the sector. The category encompasses firms such as liner and port agencies, freight forwarders and shipbrokers, who link shipping companies with customers, regulatory authorities and suppliers. So far only fragmented information is available on the general value creation strategies of these intermediaries and their behaviour towards the environmental pressures, with the main contributions stressing competitive pressures and demanding customers. The aim of this paper is to use empirical research to increase our knowledge of this topic. The maritime industry is an example of a highly dynamic sector within which the premium for efficiency erodes fast. It is characterized by the complexity of its operations and its value chain, by its global character and by volatility. As such, the industry offers an interesting and generalizable environment for research. Moreover, the choice of the middleman, an intermediary in the value chain, as the object of study, offers additional insights into the complex industry and value chain dynamics. This paper draws on qualitative data originating with interviews with industry representatives and can also be regarded as a preliminary approach to a broader project.
    [Show full text]
  • MBA (Shipping & Logistics)
    MBA (Shipping & Logistics) FIRST YEAR MSPL 10 MANAGEMENT FUNCTIONS AND BEHAVIOUR BLOCK I Evaluation of Management Theory – Scientific, classical theory – Behavioral school – Hawthorne experiments – Systems Approach – Management roles – Management skills – Management functions. Planning – Process – Organisation structure and design – Departmentation Delegation and Decentralisation – Decision making – Importance, process and techniques. BLOCK II Staffing – Recruitment, Selection and training – Communication – Process – Barriers and breakdown in communication – Electronic media in communication – Coordination – Control process – Control techniques and Information technology. BLOCK III Individual behaviour – Implications – Perception and learning – Motivation – theories and applications – Monetary and non-monetary rewards – Attitudes – Theories of attitudes – Job satisfaction and its effect on employee performance – Personality – Determinants – Theories. BLOCK IV Group behaviour – Group dynamics – Leadership – Theories and styles – Conflict and negotiation – Organisation culture – Organisation effectiveness. BLOCK V Organisation change – Manager as a change agent – Organisation Development – O.D. interventions – Organisation Behaviour in global scenario – Future trends in Organisation Behaviour REFERENCES Principles of Management - Koontz O Donnell Essentials of Management - Koontz O Donnell & Weihrich Management - Stoner, Freeman & Gilbert Management - Robins, Coulter Organisational Behaviour - Stephen. P. Robbins Organisational Behaviour
    [Show full text]
  • The Price Discovery Properties of Clean Tanker Freight Futures - Unbiasedness, Causality and Forecasting
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives NORWEGIAN SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION (NHH) Bergen, spring 2010 Master Profile: Financial Economics Advisors: Professor Siri Pettersen Strandenes and Associate Professor Jonas Andersson The Price Discovery Properties of Clean Tanker Freight Futures - Unbiasedness, Causality and Forecasting Audun Houmb Sjøli This thesis was written as a part of the master program at NHH. Neither the institution, the advisors, nor the sensors are - through the approval of this thesis - responsible for neither the theories and methods used, nor results and conclusions drawn in this work. NORWEGIAN SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION (NHH) Abstract The scope of this thesis is to examine the price discovery properties of clean tanker freight futures. This is conducted by testing the unbiasedness hypothesis, the lead-lag relationship between freight futures and spot rates and the forecasting properties of freight futures with regards to the underlying spot rates. The research focuses on the most liquid clean tanker freight futures, which are those written on the routes TC2, TC4 and TC5. The results indicate that unbiasedness depends on the route in question and time to maturity. For a one-month horizon of TC2 and one-, two- and three-month horizons of TC5, the unbiasedness hypothesis is found to hold. Unbiasedness is also indicated for the two- and three-month horizons of TC2, but due to weak evidence no conclusions are drawn. For TC4 the unbiasedness hypothesis is rejected. The results from testing the lead-lag relationship indicate that futures prices lead spot rates for all the routes, but the relationship is found to be bi-directional for TC4.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Carriers, Ports and Third Parties in Liner and Bulk Shipping
    THOMAS ROSLYNG OLESEN VALUE CREATION IN THE MARITIME CHAIN OF TRANSPORTATION THE ROLE OF CARRIERS, PORTS AND THIRD PARTIES IN LINER AND BULK SHIPPING CROSS-DISCIPLINARY AND PROBLEM-FOCUSED RESEARCH AND EDUCATION IN THE MARITIME INDUSTRY CONTEXT PUBLISHED BY: CBS MARITIME DECEMBER 2015 [email protected] WWW.CBS.DK/MARITIME PHOTOS: FRONT PAGE PHOTO: SCANPIX/IRIS PAGES 9, 19: SCANPIX/IRIS PRODUCTION: CBS MARITIME GRAPHIC PRODUCTION: SKABELONDESIGN A/S ISBN: 978-87-93262-01-0 CONTENTS CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................................................................ 4 PURPOSE AND METHODOLOGY .......................................................................................................................................................... 5 THE CARRIER: THE SHIPPING COMPANY OR SHIP OPERATOR ............................................................................................................... 10 THE ROLE OF (INDEPENDENT) THIRD PARTIES .................................................................................................................................... 13 THE LINK BETWEEN THE CONSIGNOR AND THE SHIPPING COMPANY .................................................................................................... 14 AGENTS OF AFFREIGHTMENT IN LINER SHIPPING .......................................................................................................................... 14 The Freight Forwarder
    [Show full text]
  • Best Practice Ship Management Study 2013 Fraunhofer CML
    In cooperation with Best Practice Ship Management Study 2013 Fraunhofer CML Foreword Ship managers are under increasing pressure. Overcapacities in the market are driving charter rates down. Ship owners face higher costs to finance vessels. Ship operators fight for cargo and drive down their main cost block, which is fuel. Ship managers sit in the middle and have to look after more and more for the same management fees to gain owners management contracts. At the same time lie the requirements on availability of the vessels. Quality and safety of operations, management and treatment of crew and transparency of costs spend are increasing. GL and Fraunhofer CML experts conducted a study involving about 100 ship managing companies across the globe to find out what they are doing to improve their operations and what they consider as “best practice” in the industry. “Best practice” in this study comprises all approaches, procedures, business models or tools that ship managers are using to do their business smarter, safer and greener, i.e. to be on top of competition. We invite the reader of this study to check these best practices against his own operations and get inspiration and ideas on additional improvement areas. Especially in the process and supporting tools part, we see a Iot of hidden potential that will make a big difference in costs, quality and/or speed of a ship manager. We wish you find some interesting points in this study. Enjoy reading! Prof. Dr.-Ing. Carlos Jahn Dr. Torsten Büssow Head of Fraunhofer Center for Head of Maritime
    [Show full text]