Vertical Stratification of Plant-Pollinator Interactions in A
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Tebenna Micalis – Zilveroogje (Lepidoptera: Choreutidae) Nieuw Voor De Belgische Fauna
Tebenna micalis – Zilveroogje (Lepidoptera: Choreutidae) nieuw voor de Belgische fauna Guido De Prins & Ruben Meert Samenvatting: Op 7 november 2015 werd te Zandvliet/Berendrecht in de “Ruige Heide” met een skinnerval een exemplaar van Tebenna micalis (Mann, 1857) (Zilveroogje) waargenomen. Bij nader onderzoek bleek dit zeker niet de eerste waarneming in België te zijn. Er staan reeds 35 meldingen op waarnemingen.be (december 2015). Het eerste waargenomen exemplaar komt op naam van Ruben Meert: op 02.viii.2013 te Lebbeke, Oost-Vlaanderen. Abstract: On 7 November 2015, a specimen of Tebenna micalis (Mann, 1857) was observed in a skinner trap in the domain “Ruige Heide” at Zandvliet/Berendrecht. This is certainly not the first record of this species in Belgium since there are already 35 other records on the site waarnemingen.be. The first specimen was observed by Ruben Meert on 2 August 2013 at Lebbeke, East Flanders. Résumé: Le 7 novembre 2015, un exemplaire de Tebenna micalis (Mann, 1857) a été observé dans un piège Skinner dans le domaine “Ruige Heide” à Zandvliet/Berendrecht. Il ne s’agit certainement pas de la première mention de cette espèce en Belgique, puisqu’il y a déjà 35 autres mentions sur le site web waarnemingen.be. Le tout premier exemplaire a été trouvé par Ruben Meert le 2 août 2013 à Lebbeke, Flandre Orientale. Key words: Tebenna micalis – Faunistics – Lepidoptera – New record – Belgium. De Prins G.: Markiezenhof 32, B-2170 Merksem/Antwerpen, Belgium. [email protected] Meert R.: Grote Snijdersstraat 75, B-9280 Lebbeke, Belgium. [email protected] Inleiding Poperinge: 1 imago (Margaux Boeraeve en Ward Op 7 november 2015 werd in een skinnerval, Tamsyn). -
Registrering Og Overvåking Av Utvalgte Insektarter I Oslo Kommune 2005
Registrering og overvåking av utvalgte insektarter i Oslo kommune 2005 Anders Endrestøl Øivind Gammelmo Lars Ove Hansen Ole J. Lønnve Stefan Olberg Leif Aarvik ii Registrering og overvåking av utvalgte insektarter i Oslo kommune FORORD Nasjonalt senter for insektskartlegging (NSI) ved Naturhistorisk museum, Univer- sitetet i Oslo, har i samarbeid med Norsk Naturarv utført kartlegging av utvalgte insektarter og potensielle biotoper for disse på noen av øyene i indre Oslofjord i 2005. Insektene er en gruppe som i lengre tid har vært oversett av forvaltningen, og som ge- nerelt sett ikke har vært vurdert når man har gjort kartlegginger av biologisk mangfold (eks Markussen 1999 og Bjureke 2002). I tillegg er det svært mangelfull kunnskap om utbredelse for de enkelte artene, og man vet engang ikke hvor mange arter som finnes innenfor Oslo kommune. Det er derfor gledelig og svært viktig at de entomolo- giske verdiene, som tallmessig representerer det største biologiske mangfoldet, også blir tatt med i betraktningen. NSI har i dette arbeidet, sammen med Norsk Naturarv, valgt ut et fåtall rødlistede arter som det ville være naturlig å begynne overvåknings- arbeidet med. Dette utvalget ble gjort etter en vurdering av enkelte sjeldne og truete arters økologi og utbredelse, der sannsynligheten var høy for at disse ville finnes på de aktuelle øyene. Sammenfallende for artene er at de har en sørlig, begrenset utbredelse i press- utsatte områder, og at det foreligger få registreringer av artene tidligere. Ingen av artene i undersøkelsen er dessuten tidligere registrert på de aktuelle lokalitene. Dette gjør at det er et stort behov for å øke kunnskapen om deres utbredelse og hva som på- virker den. -
Species Knowledge Review: Shrill Carder Bee Bombus Sylvarum in England and Wales
Species Knowledge Review: Shrill carder bee Bombus sylvarum in England and Wales Editors: Sam Page, Richard Comont, Sinead Lynch, and Vicky Wilkins. Bombus sylvarum, Nashenden Down nature reserve, Rochester (Kent Wildlife Trust) (Photo credit: Dave Watson) Executive summary This report aims to pull together current knowledge of the Shrill carder bee Bombus sylvarum in the UK. It is a working document, with a view to this information being reviewed and added when needed (current version updated Oct 2019). Special thanks to the group of experts who have reviewed and commented on earlier versions of this report. Much of the current knowledge on Bombus sylvarum builds on extensive work carried out by the Bumblebee Working Group and Hymettus in the 1990s and early 2000s. Since then, there have been a few key studies such as genetic research by Ellis et al (2006), Stuart Connop’s PhD thesis (2007), and a series of CCW surveys and reports carried out across the Welsh populations between 2000 and 2013. Distribution and abundance Records indicate that the Shrill carder bee Bombus sylvarum was historically widespread across southern England and Welsh lowland and coastal regions, with more localised records in central and northern England. The second half of the 20th Century saw a major range retraction for the species, with a mixed picture post-2000. Metapopulations of B. sylvarum are now limited to five key areas across the UK: In England these are the Thames Estuary and Somerset; in South Wales these are the Gwent Levels, Kenfig–Port Talbot, and south Pembrokeshire. The Thames Estuary and Gwent Levels populations appear to be the largest and most abundant, whereas the Somerset population exists at a very low population density, the Kenfig population is small and restricted. -
Global Trends in Bumble Bee Health
EN65CH11_Cameron ARjats.cls December 18, 2019 20:52 Annual Review of Entomology Global Trends in Bumble Bee Health Sydney A. Cameron1,∗ and Ben M. Sadd2 1Department of Entomology, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois 61801, USA; email: [email protected] 2School of Biological Sciences, Illinois State University, Normal, Illinois 61790, USA; email: [email protected] Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2020. 65:209–32 Keywords First published as a Review in Advance on Bombus, pollinator, status, decline, conservation, neonicotinoids, pathogens October 14, 2019 The Annual Review of Entomology is online at Abstract ento.annualreviews.org Bumble bees (Bombus) are unusually important pollinators, with approx- https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ento-011118- imately 260 wild species native to all biogeographic regions except sub- 111847 Saharan Africa, Australia, and New Zealand. As they are vitally important in Copyright © 2020 by Annual Reviews. natural ecosystems and to agricultural food production globally, the increase Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2020.65:209-232. Downloaded from www.annualreviews.org All rights reserved in reports of declining distribution and abundance over the past decade ∗ Corresponding author has led to an explosion of interest in bumble bee population decline. We Access provided by University of Illinois - Urbana Champaign on 02/11/20. For personal use only. summarize data on the threat status of wild bumble bee species across bio- geographic regions, underscoring regions lacking assessment data. Focusing on data-rich studies, we also synthesize recent research on potential causes of population declines. There is evidence that habitat loss, changing climate, pathogen transmission, invasion of nonnative species, and pesticides, oper- ating individually and in combination, negatively impact bumble bee health, and that effects may depend on species and locality. -
THE IRISH RED DATA BOOK 1 Vascular Plants
THE IRISH RED DATA BOOK 1 Vascular Plants T.G.F.Curtis & H.N. McGough Wildlife Service Ireland DUBLIN PUBLISHED BY THE STATIONERY OFFICE 1988 ISBN 0 7076 0032 4 This version of the Red Data Book was scanned from the original book. The original book is A5-format, with 168 pages. Some changes have been made as follows: NOMENCLATURE has been updated, with the name used in the 1988 edition in brackets. Irish Names and family names have also been added. STATUS: There have been three Flora Protection Orders (1980, 1987, 1999) to date. If a species is currently protected (i.e. 1999) this is stated as PROTECTED, if it was previously protected, the year(s) of the relevant orders are given. IUCN categories have been updated as follows: EN to CR, V to EN, R to V. The original (1988) rating is given in brackets thus: “CR (EN)”. This takes account of the fact that a rare plant is not necessarily threatened. The European IUCN rating was given in the original book, here it is changed to the UK IUCN category as given in the 2005 Red Data Book listing. MAPS and APPENDIX have not been reproduced here. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We are most grateful to the following for their help in the preparation of the Irish Red Data Book:- Christine Leon, CMC, Kew for writing the Preface to this Red Data Book and for helpful discussions on the European aspects of rare plant conservation; Edwin Wymer, who designed the cover and who, as part of his contract duties in the Wildlife Service, organised the computer applications to the data in an efficient and thorough manner. -
Report for the Yellow Banded Bumble Bee (Bombus Terricola) Version 1.1
Species Status Assessment (SSA) Report for the Yellow Banded Bumble Bee (Bombus terricola) Version 1.1 Kent McFarland October 2018 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Northeast Region Hadley, Massachusetts 1 Acknowledgements Gratitude and many thanks to the individuals who responded to our request for data and information on the yellow banded bumble bee, including: Nancy Adamson, U.S. Department of Agriculture-Natural Resources Conservation Service (USDA-NRCS); Lynda Andrews, U.S. Forest Service (USFS); Sarah Backsen, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS); Charles Bartlett, University of Delaware; Janet Beardall, Environment Canada; Bruce Bennett, Environment Yukon, Yukon Conservation Data Centre; Andrea Benville, Saskatchewan Conservation Data Centre; Charlene Bessken USFWS; Lincoln Best, York University; Silas Bossert, Cornell University; Owen Boyle, Wisconsin DNR; Jodi Bush, USFWS; Ron Butler, University of Maine; Syd Cannings, Yukon Canadian Wildlife Service, Environment and Climate Change Canada; Susan Carpenter, University of Wisconsin; Paul Castelli, USFWS; Sheila Colla, York University; Bruce Connery, National Park Service (NPS); Claudia Copley, Royal Museum British Columbia; Dave Cuthrell, Michigan Natural Features Inventory; Theresa Davidson, Mark Twain National Forest; Jason Davis, Delaware Division of Fish and Wildlife; Sam Droege, U.S. Geological Survey (USGS); Daniel Eklund, USFS; Elaine Evans, University of Minnesota; Mark Ferguson, Vermont Fish and Wildlife; Chris Friesen, Manitoba Conservation Data Centre; Lawrence Gall, -
Hymenoptera: Apidae)
BUMBLEBEES IN PRIME LANDSCAPES WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO THE ARAN ISLAND BUMBLEBEE (HYMENOPTERA: APIDAE) Aislinn Deenihan, B.Sc. (Env. Sci.) A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, At the Faculty of Science and Engineering, University of Limerick, Ireland. Supervisors: Prof. John Breen, Department of Life Sciences, University of Limerick. Dr. James Carolan, Department of Biology, National University of Ireland, Maynooth. Submitted to the University of Limerick May 2011 Abstract The Burren region (inclusive of the Aran Islands) in western Ireland is an example of a prime landscapes that hosts internationally rare bumblebee species, such as Bombus muscorum . For the conservation and survival of bumblebees it is important to know nest-site and spring forage plant preferences. Hence nest habitat choices of spring bumblebee queens in the Burren region was investigated by observing their nest-site seeking behaviour. In spring significant nest-site seeking behaviour associations were found for B. sylvarum , with preferences for calcareous grassland habitat and scrub- boundaries. The foraging preferences of bumblebee queens in spring were also recorded with B. sylvarum and B. ruderarius foraging most frequently from Vicia cracca and Lotus corniculatus , respectively. Significant interspecies foraging differences were found between bumblebee species recorded in this study. A melanic colour variety of B. muscorum is found in the Aran Islands, and similar varieties are known from several other islands off the British Isles. Considerable debate has taken place over the last 70 years concerning their taxonomic status. The phylogenetics and genetic differentiation of melanic colour morphs within B. muscorum were examined using DNA barcoding. On dried museum and recently caught alcohol-preserved specimens a novel technique involving a modification of the Qiagen DNeasy PBS DNA extraction protocol for insects was developed to extract DNA from the museum specimens. -
Conservation and Foraging Ecology of Bumble Bees In
Conservation and Foraging Ecology of Bumble Bees in Urban Environments Roselle E. Chapman A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, University of London. Institute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, Regent’s Park, London & University College London. April 2004 1 UMI Number: U602843 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U602843 Published by ProQuest LLC 2014. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 ABSTRACT The decline of British bumble bees has been attributed to the loss of their habitat through the intensification of agricultural practices. In the quest for information of use to bumble bee conservation the potential of our flower-rich cities has been overlooked. The overall aim of this study was to determine the status and foraging requirements of bumble bees in the urban environment provided by the city of London, U.K. My principal findings are as follows. Six common species and three rare species were identified. The greatest diversity of Bombus species was found in the east of London. Garden and wasteland habitats attracted the greatest abundance of workers and diversity of Bombus species. -
1 WNE 2019 18 Species Are Social Species. Remaining 6 Species Are
Bumblebees There are currently 24 species of bumblebee resident in Britain and 250 worldwide Bumblebees evolved in the Himalayas around 35 million years ago, and all species are quite closely related. The old English name for a Bumblebee is a Dumbledore just in case you ever wondered where JK Rowling got the name Another, the Short-haired bumblebee (Bombus subterraneus), is currently being reintroduced after going extinct in 1988. Britain also has two extinct bumblebee species: Cullum’s bumblebee (Bombus cullumanus) last recorded on the Berkshire Downs in 1941, and the Apple bumblebee (Bombus pomorum), a short-lived establishment on the south coast in the mid-1800s. They are wild, form short-lived social colonies (typically up to 3 months) and construct their own nests in cavities in hedgerows, under rocks, in disused mouse or birds’ nests, or in cavity walls. Bumblebees have the longest tongue of all UK bees reaching just over 2 cm at full stretch. The old English name for a Bumblebee is a Dumbledore just in case you ever wondered where JK Rowling got the name Seven species of bumblebee (the ‘Big 7’) are widespread across most of Britain. These are: . Red-tailed (Bombus lapidarius) . Early (Bombus pratorum) . Common carder (Bombus pascuorum) . White-tailed (Bombus lucorum) . Buff-tailed (Bombus terrestris) . Garden (Bombus hortorum) . Tree (Bombus hypnorum) The Heath bumblebee (Bombus jonellus) sometimes joins the group above, to form a ‘Big 8’, although it is absent from much of the English Midlands. There are 8 bumblebee species listed on at least one of the English, Welsh and Scottish conservation priority species lists. -
The Genus Stelis Comprises Approximately 105 Species Worldwide, with About 20 to 25% of Them Occurring in the Western Palaearctic and the Middle East
Supplement 18, 144 Seiten ISSN 0250-4413 / ISBN 978-3-925064-71-8 Ansfelden,24.März 2015 The Cuckoo Bees of the Genus Panzer, 1806 in Europe, North Africa and the Middle East A Review and Identification Guide Table of Contents Introduction ............................................................................................................ 4 General Part ............................................................................................................ 7 – Description of the Genus ........................................................................... 7 – Number of Species Described ................................................................... 7 – Species Diversity on Country Level .......................................................... 8 – Abundance of Stelis ................................................................................... 9 – Host Associations ...................................................................................... 9 – Flower Preferences ................................................................................... 15 – Flight Season ............................................................................................ 19 – Sexual Dimorphism .................................................................................. 19 – Geographic Variation ............................................................................... 19 – Taxonomy: The Subgenera of Stelis ........................................................ 20 Coverage and Methodology -
Coenonympha Oedippus (FABRICIUS, 1787) (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) in Slovenia 7 Tatjana Celik & Rudi Verovnik
Editorial: Oedippus in Oedippus 5 26 (2010) Matthias Dolek, Christian Stettmer, Markus Bräu & Josef Settele Distribution, habitat preferences and population ecology of the False Ringlet Coenonympha oedippus (FABRICIUS, 1787) (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) in Slovenia 7 Tatjana Celik & Rudi Verovnik False Ringlet Coenonympha oedippus (FABRICIUS, 1787) (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) in Croatia: current status, population dynamics and conservation management 16 Martina Šašić False Ringlet Coenonympha oedippus (FABRICIUS, 1787) (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) in Poland: state of knowledge and conservation prospects 20 Marcin Sielezniew, Krzysztof Pałka, Wiaczesław Michalczuk, Cezary Bystrowski, Marek Hołowiński & Marek Czerwiński Ecology of Coenonympha oedippus (FABRICIUS, 1787) (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) in Italy 25 Simona Bonelli, Sara Canterino & Emilio Balletto Structure and size of a threatened population of the False Ringlet Coenonympha oedippus (FABRICIUS, 1787) (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) in Hungary 31 Noémi Örvössy, Ágnes Vozár, Ádám Kőrösi, Péter Batáry & László Peregovits Concerning the situation of the False Ringlet Coenonympha oedippus (FABRICIUS, 1787) (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) in Switzerland 38 Goran Dušej, Emmanuel Wermeille, Gilles Carron & Heiner Ziegler Habitat requirements, larval development and food preferences of the German population of the False Ringlet Coenonympha oedippus (FABRICIUS, 1787) (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) – Research on the ecological needs to develop management tools 41 Markus Bräu, Matthias Dolek & Christian Stettmer -
The Best Wildflowers for Wild Bees
Journal of Insect Conservation (2019) 23:819–830 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-019-00180-8 ORIGINAL PAPER The best wildfowers for wild bees Rachel N. Nichols1 · Dave Goulson1 · John M. Holland2 Received: 31 January 2019 / Accepted: 23 September 2019 / Published online: 28 September 2019 © The Author(s) 2019 Abstract Governmental agri-environment schemes (AES) aim to improve pollinator abundance and diversity on farmland by sowing wildfower seed mixes. These often contain high proportions of Fabaceae, particularly Trifolium (clovers), which are attrac- tive to some bumblebee species, but not to most of the ~ 240 solitary bee species in the UK. Here we identify wildfowers that are attractive to a greater range of wild bee species. Forty-fve wildfower species being farmed for commercial seed production on a single farm were surveyed for native bees. Bee walks were conducted through discrete wildfower areas from April until August in 2018. The results indicate that including a range of Apiaceae, Asteraceae, and Geraniaceae in seed mixes would cater for a wide diversity of bee species. A total of 14 wildfower species across nine families attracted 37 out of the 40 bee species recorded on the farm, and accounted for 99.7% of all visitations. Only two of these 14 species are included in current AES pollinator mixes. Unexpectedly, few visits were made by bumblebees to Trifolium spp. (0.5%), despite their being considered an important food source for bumblebees, while Anthyllis vulneraria and Geranium pratense were highly attractive. For solitary bees, Crepis capillaris, Sinapsis arvensis, Convolvulus arvensis and Chaerophyllum temulum were amongst the best performing species, none of which are usually included in sown fower mixes.