DOCSLIB.ORG

Report for the Yellow Banded Bumble Bee (Bombus Terricola) Version 1.1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Report for the Yellow Banded Bumble Bee (Bombus Terricola) Version 1.1 Species Status Assessment (SSA) Report for the Yellow Banded Bumble Bee (Bombus terricola) Version 1.1 Kent McFarland October 2018 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Northeast Region Hadley, Massachusetts 1 Acknowledgements Gratitude and many thanks to the individuals who responded to our request for data and information on the yellow banded bumble bee, including: Nancy Adamson, U.S. Department of Agriculture-Natural Resources Conservation Service (USDA-NRCS); Lynda Andrews, U.S. Forest Service (USFS); Sarah Backsen, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS); Charles Bartlett, University of Delaware; Janet Beardall, Environment Canada; Bruce Bennett, Environment Yukon, Yukon Conservation Data Centre; Andrea Benville, Saskatchewan Conservation Data Centre; Charlene Bessken USFWS; Lincoln Best, York University; Silas Bossert, Cornell University; Owen Boyle, Wisconsin DNR; Jodi Bush, USFWS; Ron Butler, University of Maine; Syd Cannings, Yukon Canadian Wildlife Service, Environment and Climate Change Canada; Susan Carpenter, University of Wisconsin; Paul Castelli, USFWS; Sheila Colla, York University; Bruce Connery, National Park Service (NPS); Claudia Copley, Royal Museum British Columbia; Dave Cuthrell, Michigan Natural Features Inventory; Theresa Davidson, Mark Twain National Forest; Jason Davis, Delaware Division of Fish and Wildlife; Sam Droege, U.S. Geological Survey (USGS); Daniel Eklund, USFS; Elaine Evans, University of Minnesota; Mark Ferguson, Vermont Fish and Wildlife; Chris Friesen, Manitoba Conservation Data Centre; Lawrence Gall, Yale University, Peabody Museum of Natural History; Robert Gegear, Worcester Polytechnic Institute; Lea Gelling, British Columbia Ministry of Environment; Jason Gibbs, University of Manitoba - R. E. Roughley Museum of Entomology; Jennifer Heron, British Columbia Ministry of Environment and Climate Change Strategy; Krista Holmes, Canadian Wildlife Service Ontario, Environment and Climate Change Canada; Molly Jacobson, USFWS and University of New Hampshire; Rob Jean, Environmental Solutions & Innovations, Inc.; Guy Jolicoeur, Environment Canada, Quebec Colin Jones, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; Ann Juette, South Dakota Department of Agriculture; Lara Katz, NPS; Cherry Keller, USFWS; John Klymko, Atlantic Canada Conservation Data Centre; Eric Lofroth, British Columbia Ministry of Environment Cynthia Loftin, University of Maine; Rebecca Longnecker, USFWS; Suzanne Mason, North Carolina Natural Heritage Program; Bryce Maxell, Montana Natural Heritage Program; Marge Meizer, Alberta Canada Conservation Data Centre; Joan Milam, University of Massachusetts; Amy Nicholas, USFWS; Becky Nichols, NPS; Judith Ratcliffe, North Carolina Department Natural and Cultural Resources; Eric Rayfield, Appalachian State University Sandra Rehan, University of New Hampshire; Leif Richardson, University of Vermont and all of the contributors to the unpublished database ‘Bumble Bees of North America’. The list of data sources and their organizations for this database is at http://www.leifrichardson.org/bbna.html and in Williams et al. 2014; Lindsay Ries, NPS; Myra Robertson, Environment Canada Laura Russo, Pennsylvania State University; Laura Saucier, Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection; Jennifer Selfridge Frye, Maryland Department of Natural Resources; Cory Sheffield, Royal Saskatchewan Museum; Derek Sikes, University of Alaska Sven-Erik Spichiger, Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture; Beth Swartz, Phillip DeMayndier, Charlie Todd, Maine Department of Inland Fish and Wildlife; Todd Tisler, USFS Lisa Twolan, Environment Canada Quebec; Dragomir Vujnovic, Alberta Environment and Parks; J.B. Wallis, University of Manitoba-R. E. Roughley Museum of Entomology; Jay Watson, Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources; Rachael Winfree, Rutgers University. 2 Thanks to Leif Richardson, University of Vermont and all of the contributors to the unpublished database ‘Bumble Bees of North America’. The list of data sources and their organizations for this database is at http://www.leifrichardson.org/bbna.html and published in Williams et al. 2014, which states the following: In order to produce the book's maps, graphs of seasonal activity patterns and lists of host plants, Leif Richardson gathered digital records of bumble bee specimens from museums, academic collections and private collectors. They also received some larger, aggregate datasets from individuals who had collected bee data for other purposes. The database included nearly 275,000 records of bumble bee specimens collected around North America from 1805 to the present. Leif Richardson continues to add to the database in order to use it for additional research and conservation projects, and as of August, 2018, it contains more than 500,000 specimen and observation records for North American bumble bees. This effort has benefited from contributions by more than 100 individuals and/ or institutions, and the data describe bee specimens held in more than 150 collections around the world. Below is a partial list of individuals and institutions that Leif Richardson gratefully acknowledge as direct contributors to this resource and to publications that are based on it. A full list of collections in which the specimens reside is available upon request. Data contributors to the Bumble Bees of North America: an Identification Guide (Williams et al. 2014) include: James Strange and Jonathan Koch, USDA-ARS Bee Biology and Systematics Lab; Doug Yanega, University of California, Riverside (NSF-DBI #0956388 and #0956340); John Ascher, American Museum of Natural History; Illinois Natural History Survey; Canadian National Collection; Lawrence Gall, Peabody Museum, Yale University; Rachael Winfree, Rutgers University; Sheila Colla, Wildlife Preservation Canada; Lawrence Packer Lab research collection, York University; Virginia Scott, University of Colorado, Boulder Museum of Natural History; Kent McFarland and Sara Zahendra, Vermont Center for Ecostudies; Zuzu Gadallah, Environment Canada; Sam Droege, USGS Patuxent Wildlife Research Center; Ohio State University; Cory Sheffield, Royal Saskatchewan Museum; Douglas Golick, Nebraska Bumbleboosters; Jennifer C. Thomas, Snow Entomology Museum, University of Kansas; Rob Jean, Saint Mary of the Woods College; Rebecca Irwin, Dartmouth College; Elaine Evans, University of Minnesota; Heather Hines, North Carolina State University (now at Penn State University); Kyle Martins, McGill University; Neal Williams, University of California, Davis; Sherry Surrette, University of Mississippi; Caroline Scully, Antioch University New England; Joel Gardner, University of Minnesota; James Thompson, Rocky Mountain Biological Laboratory; Derek Sikes, University of Alaska Fairbanks; Karen Wetherill, Valles Caldera National Preserve; Jessica Beckham, University of North Texas; Leif Richardson, Dartmouth College; Michael Arduser, Missouri Department of Conservation; Rich Hatfield and Sarina Jepsen, The Xerces Society for Invertebrate Conservation; Paul H. Williams, Natural History Museum; Michael Veit, Lawrence Academy; Joseph Moisan-DeSerres , Université Laval; David Fraser; Robbin Thorp Research Collection; John Klymko, Atlantic Canada Conservation Data Center; Kevin Matteson, Fordham University; Joan Milam, University of Massachusetts; J. Ogden, Nova Scotia 3 Department of Natural Resources; Insectarium René-Martineau, Canadian Forestery Service, Quebec City; Michael Warriner, Texas Parks and Wildlife; University of Guelph; McGill University; Anna Beauchemin; Patricia Hinds; L'Association Le Balbuzard; Michel Savard; Jamie Cromartie, Stockton College; Victoria Macphail; Nacho Bartomeus, Rutgers University; Doug Gill, University of Maryland; Dan Fiscus, Frostburg University; Norwich University; Fred Morrison; Nova Scotia Museum; Gary Antweiler; Royal Ontario Museum; Liz Day; Bernd Heinrich, University of Vermont. Thanks to John Fisher, USFWS National Conservation Training Center for his technical support. Thanks to the Region 3 Rusty Patched Bumble Bee SSA Team and contributions from Andrew Horton, Tamara Smith, and Jennifer Szymanski. Thank you to the individuals who provided review, comments, and expertise for the YBBB SSA Report including: Jim Boyd, Curtis Bradbury, Sydney Cannings, Louise Clemency, Sheila Colla, Phillip deMaynadier, Elaine Evans, Danielle Flynn, Jason Gibbs, Krishna Gifford, David Goulson, Anna Harris, David W. Inouye, Eva Lewandowski, David Lincicome, Kristin Lohr, Rebecca Longenecker, Bryce Maxell, Martin Miller, Karen Newlon, Neil D. Niemuth, Robyn Niver, Jon Regosin, Leif Richardson, Rex Sallabanks, R. Todd Shaw, Beth Swartz, Paul Thompson, Charlie Todd, Allan Trently, Pandy Upchurch, Kristen Voorhies, Nathan Webb, and David Withers. Contributing YBBB SSA Report Authors (listed alphabetically): K. Hastie, E. Knoll, S. Lary, E. LeFlore, D. Smith, C. Snyder, and L. Stevenson. Suggested reference: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2018. Species Status Assessment for the Yellow Banded Bumble Bee (Bombus terricola), Version 1.0 October 2018. Hadley, MA. 4 Executive Summary This species status assessment reports the results of the comprehensive status review for the yellow banded bumble bee (Bombus terricola) and provides a thorough account of the species’ overall viability. The yellow banded bumble bee (YBBB) is a bumble bee species native to the United States and Canada. The species occurs primarily in mixed woodland and wetland habitats. To evaluate the biological status of the YBBB both currently
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Thresholds of Response in Nest Thermoregulation by Worker Bumble Bees, Bombus Bifarius Nearcticus (Hymenoptera: Apidae)
    Ethology 107, 387Ð399 (2001) Ó 2001 Blackwell Wissenschafts-Verlag, Berlin ISSN 0179±1613 Animal Behavior Area, Department of Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle and Department of Psychology, University of Puget Sound, Tacoma Thresholds of Response in Nest Thermoregulation by Worker Bumble Bees, Bombus bifarius nearcticus (Hymenoptera: Apidae) Sean O'Donnell & Robin L. Foster O'Donnell, S. & Foster, R. L. 2001: Thresholds of response in nest thermoregulation by worker bumble bees, Bombus bifarius nearcticus (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Ethology 107, 387Ð399. Abstract Regulation of nest temperature is important to the ®tness of eusocial insect colonies. To maintain appropriate conditions for the developing brood, workers must exhibit thermoregulatory responses to ambient temperature. Because nest- mate workers dier in task performance, thermoregulatory behavior provides an opportunity to test threshold of response models for the regulation of division of labor. We found that worker bumble bees (Bombus bifarius nearcticus) responded to changes in ambient temperature by altering their rates of performing two tasks ± wing fanning and brood cell incubation. At the colony level, the rate of incubating decreased, and the rate of fanning increased, with increasing temperature. Changes in the number of workers performing these tasks were more important to the colony response than changes in workers' task perform- ance rates. At the individual level, workers' lifetime rates of incubation and fanning were positively correlated, and most individuals did not specialize exclusively on either of these temperature-sensitive tasks. However, workers diered in the maximum temperature at which they incubated and in the minimum temperature at which they fanned. More individuals fanned at high and incubated at low temperatures.
    [Show full text]
  • Implications of Habitat Restoration for Bumble Bee Population Dynamics, Foraging Ecology, and Epidemiology
    IMPLICATIONS OF HABITAT RESTORATION FOR BUMBLE BEE POPULATION DYNAMICS, FORAGING ECOLOGY, AND EPIDEMIOLOGY By Knute Baldwin Gundersen A DISSERTATION Submitted to Michigan State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Entomology—Doctor of Philosophy Ecology, Evolutionary Biology and Behavior—Dual Major 2018 ABSTRACT IMPLICATIONS OF HABITAT RESTORATION FOR BUMBLE BEE POPULATION DYNAMICS, FORAGING ECOLOGY, AND EPIDEMIOLOGY By Knute Baldwin Gundersen Many insects provide valuable ecosystem services, including those that support our food supply. Beneficial insects such as pollinators fulfill part of this role by contributing to approximately one third of the global food crop production. Over the past few decades, pollinators have faced declining populations due to a variety of factors such as agricultural intensification, lack of floral and nesting resources, and disease. One method used in agricultural settings to help sustain pollinator populations is designating unfarmed habitat such as ditches and field margins for habitat enhancement in the form of hedgerows and wildflower strips. These floristically rich areas can be tailored to bloom both before and after crop bloom to help sustain pollinators during the time when crops are not in bloom. In turn, bee populations can benefit from the consistent availability of resources in these areas of habitat enhancement. This dissertation explores how habitat enhancement affects nesting density of a common wild pollinator, Bombus impatiens . Further, this research also aims to determine how foraging preferences change and how bumble bee disease transmission and prevalence respond to habitat enhancement. Research was conducted at 15 commercial highbush blueberry ( Vaccinium corymbosum ) fields in southwest Michigan containing either no restoration, a newly planted restoration, or a mature (5-8 year old) restoration in the field margin from 2015 to 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mite-Y Bee: Factors Affecting the Mite Community of Bumble Bees (Bombus Spp., Hymenoptera: Apidae)
    The Mite-y Bee: Factors Affecting the Mite Community of Bumble Bees (Bombus spp., Hymenoptera: Apidae) By Stephanie Margaret Haas Thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies, University of Ottawa, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for M.Sc. Degree in the Ottawa-Carleton Institute of Biology Thèse soumise à la Faculté des études supérieures et postdoctorales, Université d’Ottawa en vue de l’obtention de la maîtrise en sciences de l’Institut de Biologie d’Ottawa-Carleton © Stephanie Haas, Ottawa, Canada, 2017 Abstract Parasites and other associates can play an important role in shaping the communities of their hosts; and their hosts, in turn, shape the community of host-associated organisms. This makes the study of associates vital to understanding the communities of their hosts. Mites associated with bees have a range of lifestyles on their hosts, acting as anything from parasitic disease vectors to harmless scavengers to mutualistic hive cleaners. For instance, in Apis mellifera (the European honey bee) the parasitic mite Varroa destructor has had a dramatic impact as one of the causes of colony-collapse disorder. However, little is known about mites associated with bees outside the genus Apis or about factors influencing the makeup of bee- associated mite communities. In this thesis, I explore the mite community of bees of the genus Bombus and how it is shaped by extrinsic and intrinsic aspects of the bees' environment at the individual bee, bee species, and bee community levels. Bombus were collected from 15 sites in the Ottawa area along a land-use gradient and examined for mites.
    [Show full text]
  • Foe-UK-Bee-Identification-Guide.Pdf
    Want to know more about rare bumblebees? Found a bumble bee that’s not on here? Take a picture and get it identified at bumblebeeconservation.org. Bee It will be added to on-going research into UK bee populations. identification guide When your wildflowers bloom you should have lots of us coming to visit. We’re not all the same and it’s good to know your guests’ names. So we’ve put together this bee spotter guide to help you identify us. Mason Bee Early Bumblebee Osmia rufa Bombus pratorum Buff-tailed Bumblebee Common Carder Bumblebee Hairy-footed Flower Bee (female) Tawny Mining Bee (female) Forest Cuckoo Bumblebee Bombus terrestris Bombus pascuorum Anthophora plumipes Andrena fulva Bombus sylvestris Honey Bee (worker) Red Mason Bee Hairy-footed Flower Bee (male) Tawny Mining Bee (male) Great Yellow Bumblebee Apis mellifera Osmia bicornis Anthophora plumipes Andrena fulva Bombus distinguendus Early Mining Bee Garden Bumblebee Honey Bee (queen) Willughby’s Leafcutter Bee Red-shanked Carder-bee Bumblebee Andrena haemorrhoa Bombus hortorum Apis mellifera Megachile willughbiella Bombus ruderarius Illustrations by Chris Shields by Illustrations Blue Mason Bee Communal Mining Bee Ivy Mining Bee Red-tailed Bumblebee Short-haired Bumblebee Osmia caerulescens Andrena carantonica Colletes hederae Bombus lapidarius Bombus Subterraneus Davies Mining Bee Fabricus’ Nomad Bee White-tailed Bumblebee Brown-banded Carder Bumblebee Shrill Carder Bumblebee Colletes daviesanus Nomada fabriciana Bombus lucornum Bombus humilis Bombus sylvarum www.foe.co.uk charity. a registered Trust, of the Earth Friends These bee illustrations are not to scale www.foe.co.uk/bees.
    [Show full text]
  • Relationship of Insects to the Spread of Azalea Flower Spot
    TECHNICAL BULLETIN NO. 798 • JANUARY 1942 Relationship of Insects to the Spread of Azalea Flower Spot By FLOYD F. SMITH Entomologist» Division of Truck Crop and Garden Insect Investigations Bureau of Entomology and Plant Quarantine and FREJEMAN WEISS Senior Pathologist, Division of Mycology and Disease Survey Bureau of Plant Industry UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, WASHINGTON* D* C. For sale by the Superintendent of'Documents, Washington, D. G. • Price 10 cents Technical Bulletin No. 798 • January 1942 Relationship of Insects to the Spread of Azalea Flower Spot ^ By FLOYD F. SMITH, entomologist, Division of Truck Crop and Garden Insect Investigations, Bureau of Entomology and Plant Quarantine, and FREEMAN WEISS, senior pathologist. Division of Mycology and Disease Survey, Bureau of Plant Industry ^ CONTENTS Page Page Introduction ' 1 Disease transmission by insects II Insects visiting azaleas and observations on Preliminary studies, 1934 and 1935 11 their habits 2 Improved methods for collecting insects Bumblebees 2 and testing their infectivity 12 Carpenter bees 4 Studies in 1936 18 Ground-nesting bees 5 Transmission of flower spot on heads or Honeybees 5 legs or on pollen from insects- 20 Thrips 5 Transmission tests in 1937 and 1938 20 Ants 5 Relationship of insects to primary infection. 29 Flies 6 Other relationships of insects to the disease 33 Activity of bees in visiting flowers 6 Control experiments with insects on azaleas -. 39 Cause of insect abrasions and their relationship * E fîect of insecticid al dusts on bees 39 to flower spot infection < 7 Eiïect of poisoned sprays on bees 40 Occurrence on insects of conidia of the organ- Discussion of results 40 ism causing azalea flower spot 10 Summary 41 INTRODUCTION A serious spot disease and tlight was first reported in April 1931 near Charleston, S.
    [Show full text]
  • Universidad Pol Facultad D Trabajo
    UNIVERSIDAD POLITÉCNICA DE MADRID FACULTAD DE INFORMÁTICA TRABAJO FINAL DE CARRERA ESTUDIO DEL PROTOCOLO XMPP DE MESAJERÍA ISTATÁEA, DE SUS ATECEDETES, Y DE SUS APLICACIOES CIVILES Y MILITARES Autor: José Carlos Díaz García Tutor: Rafael Martínez Olalla Madrid, Septiembre de 2008 2 A mis padres, Francisco y Pilar, que me empujaron siempre a terminar esta licenciatura y que tanto me han enseñado sobre la vida A mis abuelos (q.e.p.d.) A mi hijo icolás, que me ha dejado terminar este trabajo a pesar de robarle su tiempo de juego conmigo Y muy en especial, a Susana, mi fiel y leal compañera, y la luz que ilumina mi camino Agradecimientos En primer lugar, me gustaría agradecer a toda mi familia la comprensión y confianza que me han dado, una vez más, para poder concluir definitivamente esta etapa de mi vida. Sin su apoyo, no lo hubiera hecho. En segundo lugar, quiero agradecer a mis amigos Rafa y Carmen, su interés e insistencia para que llegara este momento. Por sus consejos y por su amistad, les debo mi gratitud. Por otra parte, quiero agradecer a mis compañeros asesores militares de Nextel Engineering sus explicaciones y sabios consejos, que sin duda han sido muy oportunos para escribir el capítulo cuarto de este trabajo. Del mismo modo, agradecer a Pepe Hevia, arquitecto de software de Alhambra Eidos, los buenos ratos compartidos alrrededor de nuestros viejos proyectos sobre XMPP y que encendieron prodigiosamente la mecha de este proyecto. A Jaime y a Bernardo, del Ministerio de Defensa, por haberme hecho descubrir las bondades de XMPP.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Windows Live Messenger for Linux Ubuntu
    Download windows live messenger for linux ubuntu But installing applications in Ubuntu that were originally made for I found emescene to be the best Msn Messenger for Ubuntu Linux so far. It really gives you the feel as if you are using Windows Live Messenger. Its builds are available for Archlinux, Debian, Ubuntu, Fedora, Mandriva and Windows. At first I found it quite difficult to use Pidgin Internet Messenger on Ubuntu Linux. Even though it allows signing into MSN, Yahoo! Messenger and Google Talk. While finding MSN Messenger for Linux / Ubuntu, I found different emesene is also available and could be downloaded and installed for. At first I found it quite difficult to use Pidgin Internet Messenger on Ubuntu Linux. Even though it allows signing into MSN, Yahoo! Messenger. A simple & beautiful app for Facebook Messenger. OS X, Windows & Linux By downloading Messenger for Desktop, you acknowledge that it is not an. An alternative MSN Messenger chat client for Linux. It allows Linux users to chat with friends who use MSN Messenger in Windows or Mac OS. The strength of. Windows Live Messenger is an instant messenger application that For more information on installing applications, see InstallingSoftware. sudo apt-get install chromium-browser. 2. After the installation is Windows Live Messenger running in LinuxMint / Ubuntu. You can close the. Linux / X LAN Messenger for Debian/Ubuntu LAN Messenger for Fedora/openSUSE Download LAN Messenger for Windows. Windows installer A MSN Messenger / Live Messenger client for Linux, aiming at integration with the KDE desktop Ubuntu: Ubuntu has KMess in its default repositories.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to MN Bumble Bees: Females
    Guide to MN Bumble Bees: Females This guide is only for females (12 antennal segments, 6 abdominal segments, most bumble Three small bees, most have pollen baskets, no beards on their mandibles). First determine which yellow eyes highlighted section your bee is in, then go through numbered characters to find a match. See if your bee matches the color patterns shown and the description in the text. Color patterns ® can vary. More detailed keys are available at discoverlife.org. Top of head Bee Front of face Squad Join the search for bumble bees with www.bumbleebeewatch.org Cheek Yellow hairs between wings, 1st abdominal band yellow (may have black spot in center of thorax) 1. Black on sides of 2nd ab, yellow or rusty in center 2.All other ab segments black 3. 2nd ab brownish centrally surrounded by yellow 2nd abdominal 2nd abdominal Light lemon Center spot band with yellow band with yellow hairs on on thorax with in middle, black yellow in middle top of head and sometimes faint V on sides. Yellow bordered by and on thorax. shaped extension often in a “W” rusty brown in a back from the shape. Top of swooping shape. middle. Queens head yellow. Top of head do not have black. Bombus impatiens Bombus affinis brownish central rusty patched bumble bee Bombus bimaculatus Bombus griseocollis common eastern bumble bee C patch. two-spotted bumble bee C brown-belted bumble bee C 5. Yellow on front edge of 2nd ab 6. No obvious spot on thorax. 4. 2nd ab entirely yellow and ab 3-6 black Yellow on top Black on top of Variable color of head.
    [Show full text]
  • Species Knowledge Review: Shrill Carder Bee Bombus Sylvarum in England and Wales
    Species Knowledge Review: Shrill carder bee Bombus sylvarum in England and Wales Editors: Sam Page, Richard Comont, Sinead Lynch, and Vicky Wilkins. Bombus sylvarum, Nashenden Down nature reserve, Rochester (Kent Wildlife Trust) (Photo credit: Dave Watson) Executive summary This report aims to pull together current knowledge of the Shrill carder bee Bombus sylvarum in the UK. It is a working document, with a view to this information being reviewed and added when needed (current version updated Oct 2019). Special thanks to the group of experts who have reviewed and commented on earlier versions of this report. Much of the current knowledge on Bombus sylvarum builds on extensive work carried out by the Bumblebee Working Group and Hymettus in the 1990s and early 2000s. Since then, there have been a few key studies such as genetic research by Ellis et al (2006), Stuart Connop’s PhD thesis (2007), and a series of CCW surveys and reports carried out across the Welsh populations between 2000 and 2013. Distribution and abundance Records indicate that the Shrill carder bee Bombus sylvarum was historically widespread across southern England and Welsh lowland and coastal regions, with more localised records in central and northern England. The second half of the 20th Century saw a major range retraction for the species, with a mixed picture post-2000. Metapopulations of B. sylvarum are now limited to five key areas across the UK: In England these are the Thames Estuary and Somerset; in South Wales these are the Gwent Levels, Kenfig–Port Talbot, and south Pembrokeshire. The Thames Estuary and Gwent Levels populations appear to be the largest and most abundant, whereas the Somerset population exists at a very low population density, the Kenfig population is small and restricted.
    [Show full text]
  • Beewalk Report 2020
    BeeWalk Annual Report 2020 Richard Comont and Helen Dickinson BeeWalk Annual Report 2020 About BeeWalk BeeWalk is a standardised bumblebee-monitoring scheme active across Great Britain since 2008, and this report covers the period 2008–19. The scheme protocol involves volunteer BeeWalkers walking the same fixed route (a transect) at least once a month between March and October (inclusive). This covers the full flight period of the bumblebees, including emergence from overwintering and workers tailing off. Volunteers record the abundance of each bumblebee species seen in a 4 m x 4 m x 2 m ‘recording box’ in order to standardise between habitats and observers. It is run by Dr Richard Comont and Helen Dickinson of the Bumblebee Conservation Trust (BBCT). To contact the scheme organisers, please email [email protected]. Acknowledgements We are indebted to the volunteers and organisations past and present who have contributed data to the scheme or have helped recruit or train others in connection with it. Thanks must also go to all the individuals and organisations who allow or even actively promote access to their land for bumblebee recording. We would like to thank the financial contribution by the Redwing Trust, Esmée Fairbairn Foundation, Garfield Weston Foundation and the many other organisations, charitable trusts and individuals who have supported the BeeWalk scheme in particular, and the Bumblebee Conservation Trust in general. In particular, the Biological Records Centre have provided website support, data storage and desk space free of charge. Finally, we would like to thank the photographers who have allowed their excellent images to be used as part of this BeeWalk Annual Report.
    [Show full text]
  • Bumblebee in the UK
    There are 24 species of bumblebee in the UK. This field guide contains illustrations and descriptions of the eight most common species. All illustrations 1.5x actual size. There has been a marked decline in the diversity and abundance of wild bees across Europe in recent decades. In the UK, two species of bumblebee have become extinct within the last 80 years, and seven species are listed in the Government’s Biodiversity Action Plan as priorities for conservation. This decline has been largely attributed to habitat destruction and fragmentation, as a result of Queen Worker Male urbanisation and the intensification of agricultural practices. Common The Centre for Agroecology and Food Security is conducting Tree bumblebee (Bombus hypnorum) research to encourage and support bumblebees in food Bumblebees growing areas on allotments and in gardens. Bees are of the United Kingdom Queens, workers and males all have a brown-ginger essential for food security, and are regarded as the most thorax, and a black abdomen with a white tail. This important insect pollinators worldwide. Of the 100 crop species that provide 90% of the world’s food, over 70 are recent arrival from France is now present across most pollinated by bees. of England and Wales, and is thought to be moving northwards. Size: queen 18mm, worker 14mm, male 16mm The Centre for Agroecology and Food Security (CAFS) is a joint initiative between Coventry University and Garden Organic, which brings together social and natural scientists whose collective research expertise in the fields of agriculture and food spans several decades. The Centre conducts critical, rigorous and relevant research which contributes to the development of agricultural and food production practices which are economically sound, socially just and promote long-term protection of natural Queen Worker Male resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Trends in Bumble Bee Health
    EN65CH11_Cameron ARjats.cls December 18, 2019 20:52 Annual Review of Entomology Global Trends in Bumble Bee Health Sydney A. Cameron1,∗ and Ben M. Sadd2 1Department of Entomology, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois 61801, USA; email: [email protected] 2School of Biological Sciences, Illinois State University, Normal, Illinois 61790, USA; email: [email protected] Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2020. 65:209–32 Keywords First published as a Review in Advance on Bombus, pollinator, status, decline, conservation, neonicotinoids, pathogens October 14, 2019 The Annual Review of Entomology is online at Abstract ento.annualreviews.org Bumble bees (Bombus) are unusually important pollinators, with approx- https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ento-011118- imately 260 wild species native to all biogeographic regions except sub- 111847 Saharan Africa, Australia, and New Zealand. As they are vitally important in Copyright © 2020 by Annual Reviews. natural ecosystems and to agricultural food production globally, the increase Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2020.65:209-232. Downloaded from www.annualreviews.org All rights reserved in reports of declining distribution and abundance over the past decade ∗ Corresponding author has led to an explosion of interest in bumble bee population decline. We Access provided by University of Illinois - Urbana Champaign on 02/11/20. For personal use only. summarize data on the threat status of wild bumble bee species across bio- geographic regions, underscoring regions lacking assessment data. Focusing on data-rich studies, we also synthesize recent research on potential causes of population declines. There is evidence that habitat loss, changing climate, pathogen transmission, invasion of nonnative species, and pesticides, oper- ating individually and in combination, negatively impact bumble bee health, and that effects may depend on species and locality.
    [Show full text]