Philosophy, Psychiatry and the Neurosciences June 28Th - July 1St 2006 Leiden, the Netherlands

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Philosophy, Psychiatry and the Neurosciences June 28Th - July 1St 2006 Leiden, the Netherlands 9th International Conference on Philosophy, Psychiatry and Psychology Philosophy, Psychiatry and the Neurosciences June 28th - July 1st 2006 Leiden, The Netherlands Organized by the Section for Philosophy and Psychiatry of the Dutch Association for Psychiatry Faculty of Philosophy, University of Leiden in collaboration with The International Network for Philosophy and Psychiatry The Philosophy Special Interest Group of the Royal College of Psychiatrists (UK) Labyrinths have been known to the human race for over 4,000 years. The oldest is thought to be the “Cretan Labyrinth”. This classical Cretan labyrinth pattern has appeared for thousands of years in many variations throughout the world. The labyrinth can be found as both an image and metaphor in ancient myths, architecture, art, dance and indigenous rituals. Contents Introduction 2 Floor Plan Kamerling Onnes Building 4 Program at a glance 5 Plenary Speakers 6 Scientifi c Programme 7 Congress Information 16 Social Programme 17 General Information 18 Sponsors and acknowledgements 19 Abstracts of Plenary speakers 20 Abstracts 25 Notes 52 1 Introduction Dear colleagues, Welcome to Leiden and the 9th international conference of the International Network for Philosophy and Psychiatry (INPP). Leiden University is honoured to host this interdisciplinary conference on a rapidly expanding and increasingly important fi eld of refl ection and research. This oldest of the Dutch universities was founded in 1575. Its motto Praesidium Libertatis (bastion of freedom) refl ects core values of both the university and the city – values that were fostered during the city’s long history of struggle for independence and tolerance. Leiden is the city where the Pilgrim Fathers found refuge, it is the place where famous painters of the Dutch school lived and worked, and most notably, it is the birthplace of the illustrious Rembrandt van Rijn, whose 400th anniver- sary is commemorated this year. We hope that the clarity and open skies that are so typical for Dutch art and landscapes, together with the calm and spontaneity of the city, and the refl ective atmosphere of the Academia, will provide optimal conditions for fruitful discussion and encounter during our meeting. The topic of the conference is ‘Philosophy, Psychiatry, and the Neurosciences’. One of our aims is to clarify how philosophical refl ection on current neuroscientifi c research may help psychiatry to broaden and enrich its conceptual frameworks. There are many promising developments to report in this respect. Let me only mention the rapproche- ment between (existential) phenomenology and cognitive neuroscience, the emergence of neurophenomenology, and experiments that try to include subjective experience in neuroscientifi c research. In addition to contributions on this specifi c topic, there will be lectures on a wide variety of other issues, presented by eminent speakers from all continents of the world. We are looking forward to an exciting and fertile meeting! The organizing committee Gerrit Glas MD PhD Johan A. den Boer MD PhD Professor of Philosophy and Psychiatry Professor of Biological Psychiatry Leiden University, Leiden University Medical Centre Groningen and Groningen Zwolse Poort, Zwolle The Netherlands The Netherlands E: [email protected] E: [email protected] T: +31 38 4565 848 Alan Ralston MD MA Jetty Strijker - Meijer Psychiatrist Secretary GGZ Dijk en Duin Zwolse Poort, Zwolle Castricum The Netherlands The Netherlands E: [email protected] E: [email protected] T: +31 38 4565848 T: + 31 38 4565 848 + 31 (0)6 18 22 43 12 (mobile; conference) 2 Introduction International Scientifi c Committee Gerrit Glas, University of Leiden, The Netherlands Hans (J.A.) den Boer, University of Groningen, The Netherlands Dan Zahavi, University of Copenhagen, Denmark Andreas Roepstorff, University of Aarhus, Denmark Bill (K.W.M.) Fulford, University of Warwick and University of Oxford, UK John Sadler, Southwestern University, Dallas, USA Thomas Fuchs, University of Heidelberg, Germany Scientifi c Secretariat Professor Gerrit Glas MD PhD Zwolse Poort P.O.Box 110 8000 AC Zwolle The Netherlands Tel.: +31 (0)38 4565848 Fax: +31 (0)38 4565701 e-mail: [email protected] Conference Offi ce International Conference Services BV P.O. Box 83005 1080 AA Amsterdam The Netherlands Tel.: +31 (0)20 6793218 Fax: +31 (0)20 6758236 e-mail: [email protected] website: www.ics-online.nl 3 Floor Plan Ground Floor 4 Parallel sessions First Floor Exhibition area Lunch/break area Dinner area Plenary sessions Entrance & Registration Wednesday 11.00 - 12.30 S18 The status of verbal introspective reports S19 Explanation, understanding and pheno- 1.0017.00 Registration - 2 menology 18.00 Opening & plenary lectures S20 Psychopathology (2) S. GK.W.M.allagher Fulford & S21 Conceptual issues (1) 19.45 H. Lenferink, mayor of the City of Leiden S22 Philosophy and neuroscience (2) 20.00 Reception S23 Pathologies in gesture, verbal interac- tion, and narrative Thursday Friday 9.00 - 10.30 Plenary lectures V. GalleseT. & Metzinger 12.30 - 14.00 Lunch glance a at Program 10.30 - 11.00 Break 14.00 - 15.30 Plenary lectures G. Northoff & J.A. den Boer 11.00 - 12.30 Parallel sessions S1 Auto- vs Heterophenomelogy 15.30 - 16.00 Break S2 Schizophrenia (1) S3 General Issues (1) 16.00 - 17.30 Parallel sessions S4 Freedom, free will and autonomy (1) S24 Self and identity S5 Psychopathology and psychotherapy S25 Phenomenology and anthropological psy- chiatry 12.30 - 14.00 Lunch S26 Conceptual issues (2) S27 Classifi cation and models of disease (2) 14.00 - 15.30 Parallel sessions S28 Philosophy and neuroscience (3) S6 Philosophy and the Possibility of Psychia- S29 Concepts and boundaries of mental disor- tric imaging der S7 Freedom, free will and autonomy (2) S8 Schizophrenia (2) 19.00 Guided tour S9 Psychopathology (1) S10 Philosophy and neuroscience (1) Saturday S11 Psychiatry and society (1) 9.00 - 10.30 Parallel sessions 15.30 - 16.00 Break S30 The self, awareness of time, and its disor- ders: philosophic, neuroscientifi c critique of 16.00 - 17.30 Parallel sessions representational theories of mind S12 Taking group disorders seriously S31 Schizophrenia (4) S13 Ethics S32 History S14 Schizophrenia (3) S3 3 Philosophy and neuroscience (4) S15 Psychiatry and society (2) Philosophy, S34 neuroscience, and cognitive S16 Classifi cation and models of disease (1) psychology: variety and integration of metho- S17 General issues (2) dologies for the study of higher mental dys- functioning .3019 Dinner 10.30 - 11.00 Break Friday 11.00 - 12.30 Plenary lecture and closing address 9.00 - 10.30 Plenary lectures A. Roepstorff & G. Glas D. Murphy & D. Bolton 10.30 - 11.00 Break 5 Plenary Speakers Derek Bolton Reduction and causality; epistemological quandaries of Institute of Psychiatry the neurosciences Kings College London United Kingdom Johan A. den Boer Subjectivity and neuroscience Department of Psychiatry University Medical Centre Groningen The Netherlands Bill (K.W.M.) Fulford Neuroscience and values: Philosophy into practice in Professor of Philosophy and Mental Health mental health University of Warwick & Oxford University United Kingdom Shaun Gallagher Experience and interpretation: Bottom-up and top-down University of Central Florida explanations of schizophrenic symptoms of delusions of Department of Philosophy control. USA Vittorio Gallese Before and below Theory of Mind: Embodied simulation Department of Neuroscience and the neural correlates of intersubjectivity University of Parma Italy Thomas Metzinger Consciousness, the phenomenal self, and the fi rst-person Department of Philosophy perspective Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz Germany Dominic Murphy Psychiatry and the natural science of the human species California Institute of Technology USA Georg Northoff Neuropsychiatry and neurophilosophy - how can we de- Laboratory for functional imaging and neurophilo- tect the neuronal basis of fi rst-person phenomena? sophy Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg Germany Andreas Roepstorff Towards a research program on subjectivity in the neur- University of Aarhus osciences Denmark Gerrit Glas Concluding remarks: self-relatedness and intersubjecti- Leiden University Medical Centre vity in neurophilosophy Department of Philosophy, Leiden University The Netherlands 6 Scientifi c Programme Wednesday 28th June Venue: Pieterskerk 17.30 - 18.00 Registration desk open 18.00 - 18.15 Welcome address G. Glas, the Netherlands Professor of Psychiatry and Philosophy, Leiden University, Leiden Director of residency training, Zwolse Poort, Zwolle, The Netherlands 18.15 - 19.45 Opening lectures P1 Experience and interpretation: Bottom-up and top-down explanations of schizophrenic symptoms of delusions of control. Shaun Gallagher P2 Neuroscience and values: Philosophy into practice in mental health Bill Fulford 19.45 - 20.00 Welcome address H. Lenferink, Mayor of the City of Leiden (also on behalf of the Executive Board of Leiden University) 20.00 Welcome reception 7 Scientifi c Programme Thursday 29th June Venue: Kamerlingh Onnes Building 9.00 - 10.30 Plenary Lectures P3 Before and below Theory of Mind: Embodied simulation and the neural correlates of intersub- jectivity Vittorio Gallese P4 Consciousness, the phenomenal self, and the fi rst-person perspective Thomas Metzinger 11.00 - 12.30 Parallel Sessions S1 Room: Plenary Room Auto- versus heterophenomenology Chair: Gerrit Glas, the Netherlands Auto- versus heterophenomenology. Dan Zahavi Discussion. Vittorio Gallese Discussion. Shaun Gallagher
Recommended publications
  • How to Philosophically Tackle Kinds Without Talking About 'Natural Kinds'
    How to Philosophically Tackle Kinds without Talking About ‘Natural Kinds’ Ingo Brigandt Department of Philosophy, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada Email: [email protected] Abstract Recent rival attempts in the philosophy of science to put forward a general theory of the properties that all (and only) natural kinds across the sciences possess may have proven to be futile. Instead, I develop a general methodological framework for how to philosophically study kinds. Any kind has to be investigated and articulated together with the human aims that motivate referring to this kind, where different kinds in the same scientific domain can answer to different concrete aims. My core contention is that non-epistemic aims, including environmental, ethical, and political aims, matter as well. This is defended and illustrated based on several examples of kinds, with particular attention to the role of social-political aims: species, race, gender, as well as personality disorders and oppositional defiant disorder as psychiatric kinds. Such non-epistemic aims and values need not always be those personally favoured by scientists, but may have to reflect values that matter to relevant societal stakeholders. Despite the general agenda to study ‘kinds,’ I argue that philosophers should stop using the term ‘natural kinds,’ as this label obscures the relevance of humans interests and the way in which many kinds are based on contingent social processes subject to human responsibility. Keywords: natural kinds; science and values; non-epistemic aims; non-epistemic values; race; gender; psychiatric kinds HOW TO PHILOSOPHICALLY TACKLE KINDS WITHOUT TALKING ABOUT ‘NATURAL KINDS’ 2 1. Introduction Naturalistic approaches have recognized the existence of natural kinds in different scientific domains and the diversity of kinds across disciplines.
    [Show full text]
  • Philosophy of Psychiatry
    PHILOSOPHY OF PSYCHIATRY Jonathan Y. Tsou Iowa State University This monograph is published in the Cambridge University Press Elements in Philosophy of Science Series. This preprint version is free to view and download for personal use only. Not for re-distribution, re-sale or use in derivative works. © Jonathan Y. Tsou (2021). Tsou, J. Y. (2021). Philosophy of Psychiatry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1 Contents 1. Introduction 2. Skepticism about Biological Psychiatry 3. Defining Mental Disorder 4. Natural Kinds in Psychiatry 5. Psychiatric Classification and the Pursuit of Diagnostic Validity 6. Conclusion References 2 1. Introduction This Element examines and defends positions on core issues in philosophy of psychiatry from the perspective of analytic philosophy of science.1 The positions defended assume a naturalistic and realist perspective and are framed against skeptical perspectives (e.g., anti-psychiatry) that contend that mental disorders are determined by social causes rather than biological ones. Philosophical issues addressed include the reality of mental disorders, the problem of defining mental disorder, disease explanations, natural kinds in psychiatry, feedback effects of psychiatric classifications, the projectability of psychiatric classifications, and the validity of psychiatric constructs.2 The central argument of this Element is that mental disorders are biological kinds with harmful effects. This argument implies that genuine mental disorders are natural kinds (i.e., real classes that are discovered by classifiers), rather than artificial kinds (socially constructed classes that are invented and reflect the values of classifiers). In terms of debates between naturalists and normativists in philosophy of medicine (Murphy, 2020a), I defend a hybrid account of mental disorder that incorporates naturalistic and normative considerations.
    [Show full text]
  • CAUSAL EXPLANATION in PSYCHIATRY Tuomas K. Pernu
    CAUSAL EXPLANATION IN PSYCHIATRY Tuomas K. Pernu Department of Philosophy, King’s College London & Molecular and Integrative Biosciences Research Programme, Faculty of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Helsinki www.tuomaspernu.london Please cite as: Pernu, Tuomas K. (2019). “Causal explanation in psychiatry”. In Ş. Tekin & R. Bluhm eds, The Bloomsbury Companion to Philosophy of Psychiatry. London: Bloomsbury Academic. 1. Introduction The central aim of our scientific endeavour is to give us an accurate picture of the causal structure of the world. Having a valid and precise understanding of real causal relationships lends them to manipulation and control, which is something that is useful across the disciplines. This aspiration is particularly strong in the health sciences, which aim to give us understanding of the causes and mechanisms of diseases in order to enable us to make efficient clinical and preventative interventions. Among the most important questions of philosophy of medicine should therefore be these: what is “causation”, what is “causal explanation” and what is “causal efficacy”? Although causal explanation occupies a central place in all the health sciences, psychiatry is special in that it is affected by the mind-body problem and the issue of mental causation, the question of how, or whether, the mental and the physical can interact with each other. This chapter provides tools with which to analyse these issues in psychiatry and discusses some ways of tackling these problems in the light of some recent developments in the philosophy of science. Although these problems are not easy, and they are particularly grave in the context of psychiatry, recent discussion has brought about some significant advances which have the potential to enhance our understanding of the scientific identity of psychiatry.
    [Show full text]
  • History, Philosophy and Theory of the Life Sciences
    History, Philosophy and Theory of the Life Sciences Volume 15 Editors Charles T. Wolfe , Ghent University , Ghent , Oost-Vlaanderen Belgium Philippe Huneman , IHPST (CNRS/Université Paris I Panthéon-Sorbonne), France Thomas A.C. Reydon , Leibniz Universität , Hannover , Germany Editorial Board Marshall Abrams (University of Alabama at Birmingham) Andre Ariew (Missouri) Minus van Baalen (UPMC, Paris) Domenico Bertoloni Meli (Indiana) Richard Burian (Virginia Tech) Pietro Corsi (EHESS, Paris) François Duchesneau (Université de Montréal) John Dupré (Exeter) Paul Farber (Oregon State) Lisa Gannett (Saint Mary’s University, Halifax) Andy Gardner (Oxford) Paul Griffi ths (Sydney) Jean Gayon (IHPST, Paris) Guido Giglioni (Warburg Institute, London) Thomas Heams (INRA, AgroParisTech, Paris) James Lennox (Pittsburgh) Annick Lesne (CNRS, UPMC, Paris) Tim Lewens (Cambridge) Edouard Machery (Pittsburgh) Alexandre Métraux (Archives Poincaré, Nancy) Hans Metz (Leiden) Roberta Millstein (Davis) Staffan Müller-Wille (Exeter) Dominic Murphy (Sydney) François Munoz (Université Montpellier 2) Stuart Newman (New York Medical College) Frederik Nijhout (Duke) Samir Okasha (Bristol) Susan Oyama (CUNY) Kevin Padian (Berkeley) David Queller (Washington University, St Louis) Stéphane Schmitt (SPHERE, CNRS, Paris) Phillip Sloan (Notre Dame) Jacqueline Sullivan (Western University, London, ON) Giuseppe Testa (IFOM-IEA, Milano) J. Scott Turner (Syracuse) Denis Walsh (Toronto) Marcel Weber (Geneva) More information about this series at http://www.springer.com/series/8916
    [Show full text]
  • Radical Cognitive Science in Philosophical Psychopathology: the Case of Depression
    RADICAL COGNITIVE SCIENCE IN PHILOSOPHICAL PSYCHOPATHOLOGY: THE CASE OF DEPRESSION By ALEXANDER JAMES IBBS MILLER TATE A thesis submitted to the University of Birmingham for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Department of Philosophy School of Philosophy, Theology, and Religion College of Arts and Law University of Birmingham January 2019 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. Radical Cognitive Science in Philosophical Psychopathology: The Case of Depression Abstract The principle purpose of this collection of papers is to explore and apply ideas from various kinds of non‐traditional Cognitive Science, as well as comparing them with their more traditional counterparts, in order to reach a better understanding of the symptoms and features of depressive illness. By ‘non‐traditional’ I mean to refer to Cognitive Science that makes minimal use of the notion of abstract, post‐perceptual, and reconstructive mental representation, is computationally frugal, and treats the mind as fundamentally both embodied and environmentally embedded. This thesis in particular draws on insights from ecological psychology and action‐oriented perception, embodied and situated cognition, and predictive processing.
    [Show full text]
  • Radical Cognitive Science in Philosophical Psychopathology: the Case of Depression
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by University of Birmingham Research Archive, E-theses Repository RADICAL COGNITIVE SCIENCE IN PHILOSOPHICAL PSYCHOPATHOLOGY: THE CASE OF DEPRESSION By ALEXANDER JAMES IBBS MILLER TATE A thesis submitted to the University of Birmingham for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Department of Philosophy School of Philosophy, Theology, and Religion College of Arts and Law University of Birmingham January 2019 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. Radical Cognitive Science in Philosophical Psychopathology: The Case of Depression Abstract The principle purpose of this collection of papers is to explore and apply ideas from various kinds of non‐traditional Cognitive Science, as well as comparing them with their more traditional counterparts, in order to reach a better understanding of the symptoms and features of depressive illness. By ‘non‐traditional’ I mean to refer to Cognitive Science that makes minimal use of the notion of abstract, post‐perceptual, and reconstructive mental representation, is computationally frugal, and treats the mind as fundamentally both embodied and environmentally embedded.
    [Show full text]
  • Bodily Awareness, Pain, and the Self by Adam L Bradley a Dissertation
    Sensitive Subjects: Bodily Awareness, Pain, and the Self by Adam L Bradley A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Philosophy in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor John Campbell, Co-chair Professor Geoffrey Lee, Co-chair Professor Michael Martin Professor Alison Gopnik Summer 2019 Abstract Sensitive Subjects: Bodily Awareness, Pain, and the Self by Adam L Bradley Doctor of Philosophy in Philosophy University of California, Berkeley Professor John Campbell, Co-chair Professor Geoffrey Lee, Co-chair Imagine that you feel a pain in your hand, notice the movement of your limbs as you tie your shoes, or attend to your feeling of balance as you ride a rollercoaster. These phenomena are exercises of bodily awareness, the type of awareness one has of one’s body ‘from the inside.’ My dissertation is an investigation into the nature of bodily awareness. In it I describe and attempt to resolve a number of serious puzzles raised by the philosophical and scientific investigation of bodily self-awareness. My solution to these puzzles is to develop a novel account of bodily awareness. On the view I develop bodily awareness is basic, irreducible to other mental capacities such as perception and introspection. Only by treating bodily awareness as basic, I argue, can we understand what is distinctive about it. I begin by establishing the unity of bodily awareness. Though bodily awareness is comprised of sensory systems that are physically, functionally, and phenomenologically distinct, these distinct sensory systems nevertheless generate a single form of awareness.
    [Show full text]
  • International Perspectives in Values-Based Mental Health Practice
    International Perspectives in Values-Based Mental Health Practice Case Studies and Commentaries Drozdstoy Stoyanov Bill Fulford Giovanni Stanghellini Werdie Van Staden Michael TH Wong Editors 123 International Perspectives in Values-Based Mental Health Practice Drozdstoy Stoyanov • Bill Fulford Giovanni Stanghellini • Werdie Van Staden Michael TH Wong Editors International Perspectives in Values-Based Mental Health Practice Case Studies and Commentaries Editors Drozdstoy Stoyanov Bill Fulford Medical University Plovdiv St Catherine’s College Plovdiv, Bulgaria University of Oxford Oxford, United Kingdom Giovanni Stanghellini Department of Psychological, Health & Werdie Van Staden Territorial Sciences Centre for Ethics and Philosophy of Health “G. D’Annunzio” University Sciences Chieti Scalo, Italy University of Pretoria Pretoria, South Africa Michael TH Wong Department of Psychiatry, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine The University of Hong Kong Hong Kong, China This book is an open access publication. ISBN 978-3-030-47851-3 ISBN 978-3-030-47852-0 (eBook) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47852-0 © The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2021 Open Access This book is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this book are included in the book's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.
    [Show full text]
  • A Philosophical Investigation Into Coercive Psychiatric Practices
    MIC, University of Limerick A philosophical investigation into coercive psychiatric practices 2 Volumes Gerald Roche MSc, MPhil, BCL, BL. Volume 1 of 2 A thesis submitted to the University of Limerick for the degree of Ph.D. in Philosophy Doctoral Supervisor: Dr. Niall Keane, MIC, University of Limerick. External Examiner: Professor Joris Vandenberghe, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. Internal Examiner: Dr. Stephen Thornton, MIC, University of Limerick. Submitted to the University of Limerick, February 2012. Abstract This dissertation seeks to examine the validity of the justification commonly offered for a coercive 1 psychiatric intervention, namely that the intervention was in the ‘best interests’ of the subject and/or that the subject posed a danger to others. As a first step, it was decided to analyse justifications based on ‘best interests’ [the ‘ Stage 1 ’ argument] separately from those based on dangerousness [the ‘Stage 2 ’ argument]. Justifications based on both were the focus of the ‘ Stage 3 ’ argument. Legal and philosophical analyses of coercive psychiatric interventions generally regard such interventions as embodying a benign paternalism occasioning slight, if any, ethical concern. Whilst there are some dissenting voices even at the very heart of academic and professional psychiatry, the majority of psychiatrists also appear to share such views. The aim of this dissertation is to show that such a perspective is mistaken and that such interventions raise philosophical and ethical questions of the profoundest importance.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae Of
    Peter Zachar 1 Peter Zachar Department of Psychology Auburn University Montgomery P.O. Box 244023 Montgomery, AL 36124 (334) 244-3311 [email protected] LICENSURE Licensed Psychologist in the State of Alabama, #1212. EDUCATION Doctor of Philosophy in Psychology from the Department of Psychology at Southern Illinois University. Pre-doctoral internship at the University Counseling Service, University of Iowa. Master of Arts in Psychology from the Department of Psychology at Southern Illinois University. Bachelor of Arts in Psychology and Philosophy (double major) with a graduation (maxima cum laude) from Loras College in Dubuque, Iowa Academic Emphasis PSYCHOLOGY DEPARTMENT, AUBURN UNIVERSITY MONTGOMERY Assistant Professor (1995-2000). Associate Professor (2000-2005). Professor (2005-current). Department Chair (2003-2011). Interim Dean, School of Sciences (fall semester 2014). Associate Dean, College of Arts & Sciences (January 2015-May 2018). Associate Dean, College of Sciences (May 2018- ) Courses taught include undergraduate: history of psychology, research methods, psychological measurement, abnormal psychology, biological psychology and introduction to psychology, and graduate: history of psychology, introduction to psychotherapy, ethics, objective psychological assessment, projective psychological assessment, psychometrics, object relations theory, personality theories, evolution & psychology, abnormal psychology, and biological psychology. I have also taught the history class in an online format. Peter Zachar 2 PSYCHOLOGY DEPARTMENT, SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY AT CARBONDALE Lecturer in psychology (1994-1995). Research Assistant (1988-1991). Teaching Assistant (1987-1988). UNIVERSITY COUNSELING SERVICE, UNIVERSITY OF IOWA Taught academic study skills class (Fall 1991). PSYCHOLOGY DEPARTMENT, LORAS COLLEGE, Dubuque Iowa Teaching Assistant (1983-1986). CENTER FOR BUSINESS CONSULTATION, LORAS COLLEGE, Dubuque, Iowa Statistical Analyst (1986). Wrote statistical programs for consultation contract with community agencies.
    [Show full text]
  • The Philosophical "Mind-Body Problem" and Its Relevance for the Relationship Between Psychiatry and the Neurosciences
    The Philosophical "Mind-Body Problem" and Its Relevance for the Relationship Between Psychiatry and the Neurosciences Lukas Van Oudenhove Stefaan E. Cuypers Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, Volume 53, Number 4, Autumn 2010, pp. 545-557 (Article) Published by The Johns Hopkins University Press For additional information about this article http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/pbm/summary/v053/53.4.van-oudenhove.html Access Provided by Occidental College at 08/22/11 7:13PM GMT 06_53.4vanoudenhove 545–57:03_51.3thagard 335– 8/29/10 5:55 PM Page 545 The Philosophical “Mind- Body Proble m” and Its Relevance for the Relationship Between Psychiatry and the Neurosciences Lukas Van Oudenhove * and Stefaan E. Cuypers † ABSTRACT Parallel to psychiatry, “philosophy of mind” investigates the relation - ship between mind (mental domain) and body/brain (physical domain). Unlike older forms of philosophy of mind, contemporary analytical philosophy is not exclusively based on introspection and conceptual analysis, but also draws upon the empirical methods and findings of the sciences. This article outlines the conceptual framework of the “mind-body problem” as formulated in contemporary analytical philosophy and argues that this philosophical debate has potentially far-reaching implications for psy - chiatry as a clinical-scientific discipline, especially for its own autonomy and its rela - tionship to neurology/neuroscience. This point is illustrated by a conceptual analysis of the five principles formulated in Kandel’s 1998 article “A New Intellectual Framework for Psychiatry.” Kandel’s position in the philosophical mind-body debate is ambiguous, ranging from reductive physicalism (psychophysical identity theory) to non-reductive physicalism (in which the mental “supervenes” on the physical) to epiphenomenalist *Faculty of Medicine, Department of Pathophysiology, University of Leuven, and University Psy- chiatric Centre, Liaison Psychiatry, University Hospital Gasthuisberg; Postdoctoral Research Fellow of the Research Foundation–Flanders (FWO–Vlaanderen), Belgium.
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring the Boundaries and Ontology of Psychiatric Disorders (Pds) Using the Homeostatic Property Cluster (HPC) Model Marco Casali
    Exploring the boundaries and ontology of Psychiatric Disorders (PDs) using the Homeostatic Property Cluster (HPC) model Marco Casali To cite this version: Marco Casali. Exploring the boundaries and ontology of Psychiatric Disorders (PDs) using the Home- ostatic Property Cluster (HPC) model. Lato Sensu, revue de la Société de philosophie des sciences, Société de philosophie des sciences, 2021, Théorie et données à l’heure des données massives. Actes du VIIe congrès de la Société de philosophie des sciences 8 (2), pp.15 - 31. 10.20416/LSRSPS.V8I2. hal-03214709 HAL Id: hal-03214709 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03214709 Submitted on 2 May 2021 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Vol 8 N°2 2021 DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.20416/LSRSPS.V8I2.3 Marco Casali EXPLORING THE BOUN- DARIES AND ONTOLOGY OF PSYCHIATRIC DISOR- DERS (PDS) USING THE HOMEOSTATIC PRO- PERTY CLUSTER (HPC) MODEL SOCIÉTÉ DE PHILOSOPHIE DES SCIENCES (SPS) École normale supérieure 45, rue d’Ulm 75005 Paris www.sps-philoscience.org Vol. 8 Marco Casali EXPLORING THE BOUNDARIES AND ONTOL- OGY OF PSYCHIATRIC DISORDERS (PDS) USING THE HOMEOSTATIC PROPERTY CLUSTER (HPC) MODEL In this article we show that, even though the classification and diagno- Sommaire sis of Psychiatric Disorders (PDs) are performed according to essential- ist terms, the psychiatric diagnoses currently employed, (i.e., clinical psychiatry) do not actually meet these criteria.
    [Show full text]