Used As a Diary by Mrs Garrick from 13 September 1778 to 13 November 1779

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Used As a Diary by Mrs Garrick from 13 September 1778 to 13 November 1779 David Garrick Papers, Hereford Museum Accession number: 1992-24/36 Description: Octavo paper-backed note book (royal blue cover), used as a diary by Mrs Garrick from 13 September 1778 to 13 November 1779. A note to that effect is pinned to the front cover, in a contemporary hand. Transcript: On each double-page opening, the left hand page is headed ‘Memorandum’ and the right-hand page has a week’s entries. Each page has a pencilled margin for the date and day of the week, and the page is headed with the month and the year. Many of the memoranda pages are blank or have very few entries. For ease of understanding, in this transcript I have transcribed the entries for each week and put the relevant memoranda entries below. Sept. 1778 S[unday] 13 Flasby came Wallis dined with us M[onday] 14 Mr le Texier & Rafftor dined with us I [Tuesday]1 15th [blank] W[ednesday] 16 Mr Christie & Mr [blank] came to examine Chippendales Goods2 & dined with us My Hus[ban]d carryd Flas to Town Th[ursday] 17 Mr Wallis dined with us Fri[day] 18 My Niece & we set out by ½ after 8 Baited 2: ½ hours & arrived at [blank] by five3 Sat[urday] 19 Breakfasted at Winchester & came to L[or]d Palmerston by two. Memorandum Visits made Visits Received Mrs Moystin 1 She seems to use a capital ‘I’ for Tuesday, perhaps for dies Iovis? 2 Garrick bought a quantity of Chippendale furniture for the house at the Adelphi. McIntyre, Garrick, 467. 3 This visit to Hampshire is discussed in McIntyre, Garrick, 597-8. David Garrick Papers, Hereford Museum L[ad]y Chambers Mrs Anderson Mr Hare L[ad]y M: Cholmon[deley?] L[ad]y North Mrs Franks Sept. 1778 S. 20 We all dined at Mr Standley M. 21 Went to see Mr Rombols place I[ovis?] 22 We went a Water Party W. 23 Went to see L[ad]y Ossory Th. 24 The [sic] all dined with L[or]d P[almerston] Fr. 25 [blank] Sat. 26 We went all to Southampton to the Ball Sept. 1778 S. 27 We all dined at Mr Standley M. 28 We went to dine with Dr Warton at Winchester say [sic]the Illuminations4 I. 29 We went to see the review5 returned to dinner to L[or]d P:[almerston] W. 30 Mrs Hobert came. Octo[ber] Th. 1 My hus[ban]d was taken ill of the stone but got the Better in 2: H[ours] They all went to Mr Standleys. Fr. 2 My Hus[ban]d better we went to Mr Standley to stay. Sat. 3 My Hus[ban]d was taken ill with a pain in his stomach at night. 4 Part of the royal visit. 5 Review of troops by George III at Winchester. See Carola Oman, David Garrick (1958), 368-9. Osborn, ‘Literary material’, 120. Mcintyre, Garrick, 598. David Garrick Papers, Hereford Museum Oct. 1778 S. 4 My Hus[ban]d very ill all the night in bed this morning with a Violent Fever he grew better in the Evening M. 5 [blank] I. 6 We went from Mr Standley half after 7 & Breakfasted at Winchester with Dr Warton set out by 12: and came to Mr Wilmot half after four. W. 7 [blank] Th. 8 [blank] Fr. 9 We all dined at Mr Lester at Backsot [Bagshot] Came to Hampton by seven Sat. 10 We set out for London Went to the Play Memorandum 6th: we took Post horses from [blank] Octo[ber] 1778 S. 11 I called upon Mrs Ramus Mr Le Texier dined with us M. 12 Wandergouch Breakfasted with us Mr Barwell called. I. 13 Dr Shomberg, Barwell, Le Texier, Wandercouch Geo:[rge Garrick] & Carry [Carrington Garrick] dined with us. We went to the Play W. 14 I went to Covant [sic] Garden Th. 15 Went to the Play Fr. 16 Saw the Opera House Went to Covant [sic] Garden Sat. 17 Went to the Play David Garrick Papers, Hereford Museum Memorandum Opposite 13th Oct. ‘Miss Hoare Called’ Octo[ber] 1778 S. 18 My Hus[ban]d dined with Mr Robinson I went to Hampton M. 19 [Blank] T. 20 Called upon Mrs Chandler. The Garricks dined hear [sic] we went to Mrs Hare6 W. 21 We lent the Coach to carry the Garrick’s to Town & they were at our house Th. 22 My Niece sat for her Picture at Hampton to Mr Vander= [Van der Gutch] Fri. 23 The G[arric]ks returned to Hampton Sat. 24 [Blank] Octo[ber] 1778 S. 25 All the Garrick’s dined at home with us & their company. My Hus[ban]d dined at L[or]d Sandwich M. 26 [Blank] T. 27 My Hus[ban]d dined at the club,7 at Hampton W. 28 We came to Dine in Town Went to the Play Th. 29 My Niece was not well 6 Hare – or Mrs Garrick misspelling Hoare? 7 The club founded by Sir Joshua Reynolds and Johnson which Garrick joined in 1773. He also dined there on 27 Oct., 10 Nov., 24 Nov. and 11 Dec. Osborn, ‘Literary papers’, 122. The Turk’s Head Club (Gerard St) had been formed by Reynolds and Johnson as a dining club during the winter of 1763-4. The first members were: John Hawkins, Goldsmith, Burke, Christopher Nugent, Bennet Langton, Topham Beauclerk, Anthony Chamier. Garrick was not admitted until 1773. McIntyre, Garrick, 145-6. David Garrick Papers, Hereford Museum Dr Shomberg Capt. Hamilton Le Texier dined with us & Barwell I went to Dr Turton Fri. 30 My Niece better we went to see Mrs Rackett at Wondsw[orth] Ayrey & Walker dined here at home. Sat. 31 at home Memorandums Opposite 31 October: ‘Mrs Ricketts called’ November 1778 S. 1 We went to Wandsworth to Mr Rackett M. 2 We returned from Wandsworth to Town dined at home staid [at home] T. 3 We went to Hampton Mrs Rackett & her son came W. 4 At home. My husband road [sic] out upon Mr Rackett’s horse Th. 5 at home. My Hus[ban]d road out. Fr. 6 at home the G[arric]ks dined at Brentford. Came home & drunk Tea with us. Sat. 7 The Garricks dined with us Mr Rackett came Memorandums The 2nd I called upon L[ad]y Claremont & Mrs Recketts [Opp. 3rd]: Mr Racketts horse came for my Hus[ban]d to ride November 1778 David Garrick Papers, Hereford Museum S. 8 Mr Wallis came M. 9 Mr Wallis went away Mr Rackett went away Miss Roberts & Kitt [Catherine Garrick] dined with us. My H[usban]d with L[or]d Sandwich T. 10 Mr Rackett went away. My Hus[ban]d dined at the club. I at Mr D[avid] G[arric]k with my Niece W. 11 we went to Town. dined at home Mr Wallis young Rackett. Went to the play Th. 12 Dr Cadogan Breakfasted with us. To Buy some Things in the City. dined at home. Dr Shomberg. Le Texier. Went to Covent Garden. Fr. 13 My Hus[ban]d not very well. Vandergouch Breakfasted with us. dined at home in Shops in the morning. At home. Sat. 14 in the City & at Mrs Cornelis, Mr Wallis, Ayrey, Walker, Wilson, dined with us. at home. Memorandum Opposite 8th: Capt Hamilton came only in the morning & went away again with Mr Mackey Visits Received: Mrs Lloyd, How, G. Hardinge Mr Brathwaite Miss Soame November 1778 S. 15 We went to Wandsworth & sent the Servants to Hampton M. 16 We went to W Hampton T. 17 All the G[arric]ks dined with us & the Schaws W. 18 All the G[arric]ks & the S’s [Schaws] dined with us. Th. 19 Dr & Miss Cadogan Came The G[arric]ks & Schaws dined with us. David Garrick Papers, Hereford Museum Fri. 20 The G[arric]ks dined with us. Sat. 21 My Hus[ban]d went to town returned to diner. Mr Forest came and Wallis & young Banister came by a Mistake. he & Wallis Lay at Mrs D[avid] G[arric]k, November 1778 S. 22 The Rackett came not the son. The Cadogans went away & Wallis [went away] M. 23 Forest went away. I. 24 The Racketts went away. My Hus[ban]d dined at the club. The G[arric]k’s dined with us. W. 25 The Garrick’s dined with us. Vandergouch came but lay at the G[arric]k’s. Th. 26 We came to Town to din[n]er. Fr. 27 Walker, Wallis dined with us. Sat. 28 Walker, Wallis dined with us. We went to the Opera Kitty [Catherine Garrick] [went to the Opera] November 1778 S. 29 Dined with Mr Rigby called upon Mrs Simonett M. 30 At Home. Went to the New Play. Dec[embe]r I. 1 Visiting . the Hoares, Harteleys, & Mr Jahns [Johns?] & Wallis dined with us. We went to the Play. W. 2 Visiting. Dined at Home Carry [Carrington]. Th. 3 Kitty Breakfasted here I carry[e]d her home. David Garrick Papers, Hereford Museum Fr. 4 Ayrey, Walker Carry dined with us. At. 5 Wilson & Kitty Breakfasted with us. My Hus[ban]d went Visiting I went to the opera my Neice [sic] & Mrs Hoare. Memorandums The first Visits made Lady Spencer Mrs Lloyd Mrs How L[ad]y Clairmont 2d Mrs Montagu Mainel L[ad]y How Duchess of Devonshire Mrs Vesey Duchess of Portland Dec[embe]r 1778 S. 6 We dined with Mrs Montagu my Niece at h[ome] M.
Recommended publications
  • Entre Classicismo E Romantismo. Ensaios De Cultura E Literatura
    Entre Classicismo e Romantismo. Ensaios de Cultura e Literatura Organização Jorge Bastos da Silva Maria Zulmira Castanheira Studies in Classicism and Romanticism 2 FLUP | CETAPS, 2013 Studies in Classicism and Romanticism 2 Studies in Classicism and Romanticism is an academic series published on- line by the Centre for English, Translation and Anglo-Portuguese Studies (CETAPS) and hosted by the central library of the Faculdade de Letras da Universidade do Porto, Portugal. Studies in Classicism and Romanticism has come into being as a result of the commitment of a group of scholars who are especially interested in English literature and culture from the mid-seventeenth to the mid- nineteenth century. The principal objective of the series is the publication in electronic format of monographs and collections of essays, either in English or in Portuguese, with no pre-established methodological framework, as well as the publication of relevant primary texts from the period c. 1650–c. 1850. Series Editors Jorge Bastos da Silva Maria Zulmira Castanheira Entre Classicismo e Romantismo. Ensaios de Cultura e Literatura Organização Jorge Bastos da Silva Maria Zulmira Castanheira Studies in Classicism and Romanticism 2 FLUP | CETAPS, 2013 Editorial 2 Sumário Apresentação 4 Maria Luísa Malato Borralho, “Metamorfoses do Soneto: Do «Classicismo» ao «Romantismo»” 5 Adelaide Meira Serras, “Science as the Enlightened Route to Paradise?” 29 Paula Rama-da-Silva, “Hogarth and the Role of Engraving in Eighteenth-Century London” 41 Patrícia Rodrigues, “The Importance of Study for Women and by Women: Hannah More’s Defence of Female Education as the Path to their Patriotic Contribution” 56 Maria Leonor Machado de Sousa, “Sugestões Portuguesas no Romantismo Inglês” 65 Maria Zulmira Castanheira, “O Papel Mediador da Imprensa Periódica na Divulgação da Cultura Britânica em Portugal ao Tempo do Romantismo (1836-1865): Matérias e Imagens” 76 João Paulo Ascenso P.
    [Show full text]
  • Romeo Revived .Pdf
    McGirr, E. (2017). "What's in a Name?": Romeo and Juliet and the Cibber Brand. Shakespeare. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450918.2017.1406983 Peer reviewed version Link to published version (if available): 10.1080/17450918.2017.1406983 Link to publication record in Explore Bristol Research PDF-document This is the author accepted manuscript (AAM). The final published version (version of record) is available online via Taylor and Francis at http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17450918.2017.1406983. Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher. University of Bristol - Explore Bristol Research General rights This document is made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the reference above. Full terms of use are available: http://www.bristol.ac.uk/red/research-policy/pure/user-guides/ebr-terms/ Elaine M. McGirr Reader in Theatre & Performance Histories University of Bristol “What’s in a name?”: Romeo and Juliet and the Cibber brand Abstract: The 1744 and 1748/50 performances of Romeo and Juliet by Theophilus Cibber, Jenny Cibber and Susannah Cibber explain the significance of the play’s return to the repertory, uncover the history of rival interpretations of Juliet’s character, and make sense of the careers and reputations of the theatrical Cibbers. The “Cibberian” airs of all three Cibbers were markedly different, as were their interpretations of Shakespeare’s star-crossed lovers. Keywords: Shakespearean adaptation, performance history, celebrity, authorial reputation, repertory In Romeo and Juliet, Juliet apostrophizes Romeo to deny thy father and refuse thy name, assuring her (supposedly) absent lover that a rose by any other name would smell as sweet.
    [Show full text]
  • Shakespeare and London Programme
    andShakespeare London A FREE EXHIBITION at London Metropolitan Archives from 28 May to 26 September 2013, including, at advertised times, THE SHAKESPEARE DEED A property deed signed by Mr. William Shakespeare, one of only six known examples of his signature. Also featuring documents from his lifetime along with maps, photographs, prints and models which explore his relationship with the great metropolis of LONDONHighlights will include the great panoramas of London by Hollar and Visscher, a wall of portraits of Mr Shakespeare, Mr. David Garrick’s signature, 16th century maps of the metropolis, 19th century playbills, a 1951 wooden model of The Globe Theatre and ephemera, performance recording and a gown from Shakespeare’s Globe. andShakespeare London In 1613 William Shakespeare purchased a property in Blackfriars, close to the Blackfriars Theatre and just across the river from the Globe Theatre. These were the venues used by The Kings Men (formerly the Lord Chamberlain’s Men) the performance group to which he belonged throughout most of his career. The counterpart deed he signed during the sale is one of the treasures we care for in the City of London’s collections and is on public display for the first time at London Metropolitan Archives. Celebrating the 400th anniversary of the document, this exhibition explores Shakespeare’s relationship with London through images, documents and maps drawn from the archives. From records created during his lifetime to contemporary performances of his plays, these documents follow the development of his work by dramatists and the ways in which the ‘bardologists’ have kept William Shakespeare alive in the fabric of the city through the centuries.
    [Show full text]
  • 'The Little-Ingenious Garrick and the Ingenious Little Hogarth'
    Video transcript 'The little-ingenious Garrick and the ingenious little Hogarth' Robin Smith Honorary Professor of English, University College London and William Chubb Actor The Queen’s Gallery, Buckingham Palace Wednesday, 23 April 2014 ROBIN SIMON: In July 1746 the great actor David Garrick wrote a reply to an invitation from the reverend John Hoadly – [CAPTION: The Revd John Hoadly (right) detail from double portrait with Dr Maurice Greene, 1747, National Portrait Gallery] WILLIAM CHUBB: Your invitation to the Old Alresford I most cordially accept of and the little ingenious Garrick with the ingenious little Hogarth will get up on a horseblock. Mount a couple of quadrupeds, or one if it carries double and high away to the reverend Rigdom Funnydose there to be merry, facetious, mad and nonsensical. ' ROBIN SIMON: Well they were certainly facetious. The house party acted, at least to their great enjoyment, what was described as a little bawdy play by Garrick, entitled Rag-and-jaw – rag and jaw. At this stage I think I ought to make one thing clear about Georgian life and humour, it’s, well how shall we put it, very down to earth. And so if you wish you may put your hands over your ears now. Rag-and-jaw is a skit upon the relationship between Brutus and Cassius in Julius Caesar, only now of course inevitably the characters are Brute-arse and Cassy-arse. I didn't say that Georgian, Georgian hjour was subtle. <Footer addr ess> Accompanied by Lucius, oh sorry Loose-arse. Garrick played Cassy-arse and the reverend John Hoadly was Brute-arse.
    [Show full text]
  • Adopting a Chinese Mantle: Designing and Appropriating Chineseness 1750-1820
    This electronic thesis or dissertation has been downloaded from the King’s Research Portal at https://kclpure.kcl.ac.uk/portal/ Adopting a Chinese Mantle Designing and Appropriating Chineseness 1750-1820 Newport, Emma Helen Henke Awarding institution: King's College London The copyright of this thesis rests with the author and no quotation from it or information derived from it may be published without proper acknowledgement. END USER LICENCE AGREEMENT Unless another licence is stated on the immediately following page this work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International licence. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ You are free to copy, distribute and transmit the work Under the following conditions: Attribution: You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work). Non Commercial: You may not use this work for commercial purposes. No Derivative Works - You may not alter, transform, or build upon this work. Any of these conditions can be waived if you receive permission from the author. Your fair dealings and other rights are in no way affected by the above. Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 24. Sep. 2021 Adopting a Chinese Mantle: Designing and Appropriating Chineseness 1750-1820 Emma Helen Henke Newport King’s College London Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in English Research 1 Abstract The thesis examines methods of imagining and appropriating China in Britain in the period 1750 to 1820.
    [Show full text]
  • Garrick's Alterations of Shakespeare
    Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-88977-3 - Shakespeare and Garrick Vanessa Cunningham Excerpt More information prologue Garrick’s alterations of Shakespeare – a note on texts The great majority of the versions of Shakespeare’s plays made by David Garrick and published during his management of Drury Lane (1747– 1776) are described on their title pages as ‘alterations’, or as having been 1 ‘alter’d for performance’. The two operas (The Fairies, 1755, and The Tempest, 1756) are said to be ‘taken from Shakespear’, while Antony and Cleopatra,publishedin1758 and generally credited jointly to Edward Capell and Garrick (though not attributed to either on the title page), is dis- tinguished from the others by its description as ‘an historical Play, written by William Shakespeare: fitted for the Stage by abridging only’. Despite the fact that Harry William Pedicord and Fredrick Louis Bergmann, modern editors of Garrick’s plays, entitle their two volumes of Shakespeare- 2 derived texts ‘adaptations’, ‘alteration’ is certainly the preferable term for discussion of Garrick’s performance versions of Shakespeare’s plays, since throughout the eighteenth century ‘alter’ was used far more commonly than ‘adapt’. Garrick, according to Pedicord and Bergmann, is believed to have been involved in the altering of some twenty-two plays by Shakespeare over the course of his professional career. In their collected edition they reproduce 3 the dozen that they consider can be authenticated. The present work discusses a selection of alterations that span Garrick’s professional career. Two are from the early years (Macbeth, Romeo and Juliet) and two from the middle period (Florizel and Perdita, Antony and Cleopatra).
    [Show full text]
  • Seeing the Sentiment: Eighteenth Century Theatrical Portraiture And
    Graduate Journal of Visual and Material Culture Issue 7 |2014 ! Seeing the Sentiment: Eighteenth-Century Theatrical Portraiture and Garrick’s Adaptation of Romeo and Juliet by Emily Leach ________________________________________________________ ! Abstract: Not only did the theatrical portraiture of the eighteenth cen- tury contribute to the creation of celebrity by depicting the most prom- inent actors and actresses of the day in the roles for which they were most famous, but it also preserved some of the period’s most iconic dramatic scenes. One such example is Benjamin Wilson’s popular 1753 print of David Garrick and George Anne Bellamy in Romeo and Juliet, which sold very well, and in fact can be purchased on t-shirts and coffee mugs to this day. In this print, Garrick and Bellamy are act- ing the famous tomb scene, one of Garrick’s own additions to Shake- speare’s original script. Through a study of Wilson’s famous print, along with the print, published by W. Herbert in 1753, of Henry Wood- ward as Mercutio reciting the “Queen Mab” speech, and William El- liot’s 1759 print of Spranger Barry and Maria Isabella Nossiter acting the famous balcony scene, my paper considers Garrick’s adaptation of Shakespeare’s famous tragedy and its relationship to the theatrical portraiture that came out of it, in order to ask how the portraits speak to the text and the performances which they were intended to repre- sent. Through a close reading of these three theatrical portraits along- side two earlier works, Charles Le Brun’s A Method to Design the Passions (1734) and John Weaver’s descriptions of theatrical ges- tures in The Loves of Mars and Venus (1717), my paper argues that the portraits affirm the desired increase in sentimentality that Garrick tried to effect within Romeo and Juliet through his adaptation.
    [Show full text]
  • Women, Morality and Advice Literature, Parts 1 to 3
    Women, Morality and Advice Literature, Parts 1 to 3 WOMEN, MORALITY AND ADVICE LITERATURE Manuscripts and Rare Printed Works of Hannah More (1745-1833) and her circle from the Clark Library, Los Angeles Part 1: Manuscripts, First Editions and Rare Printed Works of Hannah More Part 2: Gift Books, Memoirs, Pamphlets and the Cheap Repository Tracts Part 3: Writings by The Eminent Blue Stockings Contents listing PUBLISHER'S NOTE Hannah More's Public Voice in Georgian Britain by Patricia Demers Hannah More, Revolutionary Reformer by Anne K. Mellor CONTENTS OF REELS - PART 1 DETAILED LISTING - PART 1 CONTENTS OF REELS - PART 2 DETAILED LISTING - PART 2 CONTENTS OF REELS - PART 3 CHEAP REPOSITORY TRACTS LISTING Women, Morality and Advice Literature, Parts 1 to 3 Publisher's Note Women, Morality and Advice Literature focuses on the life and works of Hannah More (1745-1833), one of the best selling and most influential women authors of her time, in England. Through her writings, philanthropy, political activities, and personal relationships More set out to lead a moral revolution of the nation’s manners and principles. Writing in different literary genres and styles her printed works span a period of some five decades. Plays, poetry and prose written in different styles, were aimed at all levels of society – from the aristocracy to the lower-class reader. This major collection of books and autograph letters by Hannah More is held in the Special Collections of the William Andrews Clark Memorial Library, at the University of California Los Angeles. In recent years, with the benefit of the Ahmanson Foundation, the library has been collecting materials from the later eighteenth century to the early 1800s, and is now recognised by scholars as one of the great centres in the world for seventeenth and eighteenth century studies.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Chapter 12 'THINKING MINDS of BOTH SEXES': Patriotism, British Bluestockings and the Wars Against Revolutionary America An
    1 Chapter 12 ‘THINKING MINDS OF BOTH SEXES’: Patriotism, British Bluestockings and the Wars against Revolutionary America and France, 1775-1802 Emma V. Macleod ‘Without intending it, I have slid into politics’, wrote the poet Anna Seward at the end of a long letter to a regular correspondent, Colonel Dowdeswell of Shrewsbury, in November 1797. ‘In a period so momentous,’ she explained, ‘their attraction, to thinking minds of both sexes, is resistless.’1 This quotation might suggest that Seward had forgotten herself temporarily to make a brief aside which touched on some political question. In fact, her whole letter had been devoted to discussing the war against revolutionary France—her enjoyment of a concert in Birmingham given to celebrate Admiral Duncan’s victory at Camperdown the previous month; the civility of the eighty French prisoners of war exiled in her home town of Lichfield in Staffordshire for the past ten months; the prisoners’ inhospitable reception by most of the other residents of Lichfield and their recent removal to Liverpool jail; her musing on the sufferings of British prisoners of war in France; the miseries and evils of war in general; and the prejudice and corruption of the Pitt administration in its refusal to seek peace with France sooner. The ‘slide’ into 2 politics that she mentions therefore represents no momentary lapse, but rather a natural shift from describing her experience, as a genteel woman, of the British homefront during the war against revolutionary France—through appropriately feminine expressions of anxiety about British prisoners and the horrors of war—to clearly political judgement regarding the errors of government policy.
    [Show full text]
  • Bluestockings: Women of Reason from Enlightenment to Romanticism
    scope beyond the strictly historical regimes and categories of illegality BLUESTOCKINGS: borders of the nineteenth century dispose disabled persons, racialized WOMEN OF to include the adoption of the Con- Others, and women as people outside REASON FROM stitution in the eighteenth century the borders of belonging. The third and the subsequent amendments that and final chapter discusses the means ENLIGHTENMENT TO followed. In this way, she considers by which individuals challenge and ROMANTICISM the various challenges to the notions resist these borders, and how those of personhood and citizenship that sanctioned under law attempt to de- Elizabeth Eger came with the abolition of slavery, fend them. What is striking here are Houndsmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave with calls for suffrage, with property the similarities between contestations Macmillan, 2010 reform, and with the Immigration and defenses. Welke points out, for Acts of the 1920s. instance, that like those challenging REVIEWED BY GISELA This book asks a series of questions oppressive legal structures, those ARGYLE that demonstrate the complexity of who defend them rely on a similar the concept of “belonging.” Welke language of inclusion in order to mask provides examples of the ways in privilege and make it less accessible to Elizabeth Eger’s group biography which personhood and citizenship, those subordinated under law. builds on and expands the focus of while interrelated, are somewhat Encompassing legal precedents Sylvia Myers’s study The Bluestocking distinct considerations: personhood and court cases, social histories, and Circle: Women, Friendship, and the being the recognition of the indi- published letters and memoirs, Wel- Life of the Mind in Eighteenth-Century vidual specifically under law, the ke’s research is expansive and varied.
    [Show full text]
  • Spectacular Disappearances: Celebrity and Privacy, 1696-1801
    Revised Pages Spectacular DiSappearanceS Revised Pages Revised Pages Spectacular Disappearances Celebrity and Privacy, 1696– 1801 Julia H. Fawcett University of Michigan Press Ann Arbor Revised Pages Copyright © 2016 by Julia H. Fawcett All rights reserved This book may not be reproduced, in whole or in part, including illustrations, in any form (beyond that copying permitted by Sections 107 and 108 of the U.S. Copyright Law and except by reviewers for the public press), without written permission from the publisher. Published in the United States of America by the University of Michigan Press Manufactured in the United States of America c Printed on acid- free paper 2019 2018 2017 2016 4 3 2 1 A CIP catalog record for this book is available from the British Library. ISBN 978– 0- 472– 11980– 6 (hardcover : alk. paper) ISBN 978– 0- 472– 12180– 9 (e-book) Revised Pages Acknowledgments I have often wondered if my interest in authors who wrote themselves in order to obscure themselves stems from my own anxieties about the permanence of the printed word—m y own longing (that I imagine everyone shares?) for words that linger on the page for a moment only and then— miraculously, mercifully— disappear before their inadequacies can be exposed. I think I will always harbor this anxiety, but I have been blessed with mentors, colleagues, friends, and family members who have known how to couch their criticism in kindness and without whom I could never have summoned the courage to keep this work up or to set these words down. The germs for this book’s ideas began many years ago, when, as an under- graduate at Harvard, I stumbled somewhat accidentally (to fulfill a require- ment) into Lynn Festa’s course on “Sex and Sensibility during the Enlighten- ment.” Thank goodness for requirements.
    [Show full text]
  • Reading the Irish Woman: Studies in Cultural Encounter and Exchange, 1714–1960
    Reading the Irish Woman: Studies in Cultural Encounter and Exchange, 1714–1960 Meaney, Reading the Irish Woman.indd 1 15/07/2013 12:33:33 Reappraisals in Irish History Editors Enda Delaney (University of Edinburgh) Maria Luddy (University of Warwick) Reappraisals in Irish History offers new insights into Irish history, society and culture from 1750. Recognising the many methodologies that make up historical research, the series presents innovative and interdisciplinary work that is conceptual and interpretative, and expands and challenges the common understandings of the Irish past. It showcases new and exciting scholarship on subjects such as the history of gender, power, class, the body, landscape, memory and social and cultural change. It also reflects the diversity of Irish historical writing, since it includes titles that are empirically sophisticated together with conceptually driven synoptic studies. 1. Jonathan Jeffrey Wright, The ‘Natural Leaders’ and their World: Politics, Culture and Society in Belfast, c.1801–1832 Meaney, Reading the Irish Woman.indd 2 15/07/2013 12:33:33 Reading the Irish Woman Studies in Cultural Encounter and Exchange, 1714–1960 GerArdiNE MEANEY, MARY O’Dowd AND BerNAdeTTE WHelAN liVerPool UNIVersiTY Press Meaney, Reading the Irish Woman.indd 3 15/07/2013 12:33:33 reading the irish woman First published 2013 by Liverpool University Press 4 Cambridge Street Liverpool L69 7ZU Copyright © 2013 Gerardine Meaney, Mary O’Dowd and Bernadette Whelan The rights of Gerardine Meaney, Mary O’Dowd and Bernadette Whelan to be identified as the authors of this book have been asserted by them in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988.
    [Show full text]