DOCSLIB.ORG

Narrative​​Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Final ​Narrative​ ​Report​ of ​the​ ​project​ “Smart ​Waste​ ​Management​ ​in​ ​EaP​ ​Countries”​ Grant ​Agreement​ ​no:​ ​SEC003/2017/WG3/02​ EaP ​CSF​ ​RE-GRANTING​ ​2017​ Final ​Narrative​ ​Report​ Project ​title:​ ​Smart​ ​Waste​ ​Management​ ​in​ ​EaP​ ​Countries​ Grant ​Agreement​ ​no:​ ​SEC003/2017/WG3/02​ Project ​duration:​ ​05/01/2017-10/30/2017​ Reported ​period:​ ​05/01-10/30/2017​ The ​Lead​ ​organisation:​ ​Good​ ​Deeds,​ ​NGO​ Address: ​Puliuya​ ​Street​ ​2/74,​ ​Kyiv,​ ​Ukraine​ ​03048​ Person ​responsible​ ​for​ ​the​ ​project:​ ​Oleksandra​ ​Gumeniuk​ Contact ​details:​ ​+380956077857,​ ​[email protected]​ The ​Partner​ ​organisations​ ​and​ ​contact​ ​persons:​ 1. National Environmental Center, 95A, Alexandru Hijdeu str., Chisinau, R. Moldova. Ina Coseru, [email protected] ​,​ ​+373​ ​22​ ​108861;​ ​+373​ 798 17 ​448​ 2. International Business and Economic Development Center, Ap. 13, 12 Vazha-Pshavela Ave. Block II, 0186 Tbilisi, Georgia. David Tsiskaridze, [email protected]​ ;​ +995570506272; +995595762276 1. ​Overall​ ​description​ ​of​ ​project​ ​implementation,​ The ​project​ ​was​ ​planned​ ​to​ ​be​ ​implemented​ ​from​ ​01​ ​May​ ​till​ ​30​ ​October​ ​2017​ ​year.​ According to the overall objective of the project which was to reduce damage to the environment through improved waste management which would increase environmental protection, energy independence and overall – economic development of the EaP countries, our consortium of partner organizations has reached such ​specific​ ​tasks:​ ● Raised the capacities and the awareness of leaders of household associations / condominiums in selected ​regions​ ​of​ ​UA,​ ​MD​ ​and​ ​GE​ ​on​ ​EU​ ​requirements​ ​on​ ​waste​ ​management​ ● Promoted a constant dialogue between various target groups in order to promote the Laws of Waste which ​were​ ​adopted​ ​according​ ​to​ ​EU​ ​legislation​ ​and​ ​AAs​ ​signed​ ​with​ ​EU​ ● Disseminated experience on best examples in improving waste management in EaP countries at the level ​of​ ​6​ ​EaP​ ​countries​ ​using​ ​6​ ​National​ ​Platforms​ ​of​ ​CSF​ ​EaP​ Changes ​in​ ​timeline​ ​and​ ​reasons​ ​for​ ​changes:​ 1. Georgian partner has savings from translation 600Euro, and he would like to spend them for the round table ​in​ ​Tbilisi,​ ​with​ ​mass​ ​media​ ​and​ ​stakeholders.​ 2. Georgian partner would like to change the format of the Guideline from A5 to A4, with proportional changes ​of​ ​volume​ ​of​ ​the​ ​material.​ 3. Ukrainian part - we have savings from vehicle needs in Georgia. Instead of 300Euro we have spent 100 Euro for the vehicle. We would like for this money to print more guidelines (not 300 items, but 500 items) 4. Georgian partner convinced us about inefficiency of training in Poti, so we changed it to Kutaisi. We have already arranged the training on 16th of August in Kutaisi. Also according to the project plan we have already arranged training in Batumi on 18th of August. The last city in Georgia is Tbilisi which we plan for the September. As Ukrainian partner I have no budget to visit Georgia twice (in August and September). ​So​ ​Georgian​ ​partners​ ​arranged​ ​training​ ​in​ ​Tbilisi​ ​by​ ​themselves​ ​in​ ​September.​ 5. Project partner from Moldova made changes in budget - transfer of money which was needed to print guidelines - instead of guidelines print 4000 posters. They had had a discussion with Chisinau Mayoralty, who asked to print more posters as they were starting to set up a new system of separate collection of solid municipal waste and would like to inform the population on the changes in the system ​of​ ​collecting​ ​waste.​ 6. In Ukraine, project supposed arrangement of trainings in Zhytomyr city, but after month of negotiation, Zhytomyr City didn’t approve it to us, that is why we had to change the city from Zhytomyr to Ivano-Frankivsk and because of loosing the time for the negotiation, the end of the project implementation was 4th November instead of 30th October. All changes were approved by the Secretariat ​of​ ​CSF​ ​EaP.​ 2. ​Project​ ​Activities​ ​and​ ​Outputs​ :​ № Date of Type of Participants involved, Deliverables, ​Outputs​ Partner activity activity Beneficiaries 1 05/01-07/3 Development Experts, project Guideline “Smart Waste UA,MD, 0/2017 of ​guideline​ coordinators Management ​in​ ​EaP​ ​countries”​ GE 2 07/26/2017 Round table, Community leaders, 20 participants presented key UA discussion, experts, representative points, which were taken from the Kyiv, of Kyiv City discussion and were put into the Ukraine Department of Utilities, Guideline business ​representatives​ 3 08/04/2017 Training, 15 Heads of 15 participants received MD Chisinau condominiums, ​experts​ information about new legislation (Buiucani in Waste Management field. district), During the event, the author of the Moldova Law on Waste, Tatiana Tugui, explained what are the new approaches of the Law which were transposed into the national legislation from the EU legislation in ​the​ ​field​ ​of​ ​waste​ ​management.​ 4 08/16/2017 Training, 30 ​Community​ ​leaders​ 30 Participants received printed GE, ​UA​ Kutaisi, Guideline and actively participated Georgia in the training, asking questions and discussing key problems in waste ​management​ 5 08/16/2017 Training, 7 Business 7 participants as business shared GE, ​UA​ Kutaisi, representatives, the situation in the city, and were Georgia representative of interested in the presented concept Kutaisi City of ​the​ ​East​ ​Partnership​ ​Network​ Department of Utilities and ​Waste​ ​Management​ 6 08/18/2017 Training, 9 Community leaders, 15 Participants received printed GE, ​UA​ Batumi, experts, representative Guideline and actively participated Georgia of Batumi City in the training, asking questions Department of Utilities, and discussing key problems in 3 business waste ​management​ representatives 7 08/29/2017 Training, Community leaders, 45 Participants (community UA Kyiv, experts, representative leaders, business representatives, Ukraine of Kyiv City representatives of District Utilities Department of Utilities, Departments of Kyiv City business ​representatives​ Administration) received printed Guideline and actively participated in the training, asking questions and discussing key problems in waste ​management​ 8 09/08/2017 Training, Community leaders, 35 Participants (community UA Cherkasy, experts, representative leaders, business representatives, Ukraine of Cherkasy City representatives of District Department of Utilities, Utitilities Departments of business representatives Cherkasy City Hall) received in ​waste​ ​management​ printed Guideline and actively participated in the training, asking questions and discussing key problems ​in​ ​waste​ ​management​ 9 09/15/2011 Training, Community leaders, 45 Participants (community MD 7 Chisinau experts, representative leaders, business representatives, (Ciocana of Chisinau City representatives of District Dist.), Department of Utilities, Utitilities Departments of Chisinau Moldova business representatives City Hall) received printed posters in ​waste​ ​management​ and actively participated in the training, asking questions and discussing key problems in waste management 10 09/19/2011 Training, Community leaders, 30 Participants (community MD 7 Chisinau experts, representative leaders, business representatives, (Botanica of Chisinau City representatives of District Dist.), Department of Utilities, Utitilities Departments of Chisinau Moldova business representatives City Hall) received printed posters in ​waste​ ​management​ and actively participated in the training, asking questions and discussing key problems in waste management 11 09/22/2011 Training, Community leaders, 36 Participants (community MD 7 Chisinau experts, representative leaders, business representatives, (Riscani of Chisinau City representatives of District Dist.), Department of Utilities, Utitilities Departments of Chisinau Moldova business representatives City Hall) received printed posters in ​waste​ ​management​ and actively participated in the training, asking questions and discussing key problems in waste management 12 09/26/2017 Training, Community leaders, 30 Participants (community UA Kyiv experts, representative leaders, business representatives, (Podilsky of Kyiv City representatives of District Dist.), Department of Utilities, Utitilities Departments of Kyiv Ukraine business representatives City Hall) received printed posters in ​waste​ ​management​ and actively participated in the training, asking questions and discussing key problems in waste management 13 10/03/2017 Training, Community leaders, 15 Participants (community MD Chisinau experts, representative leaders, business representatives, (Centru of Chisinau City representatives of District Dist.), Department of Utilities, Utitilities Departments of Chisinau Moldova business representatives City Hall) received printed posters in ​waste​ ​management​ and actively participated in the training, asking questions and discussing key problems in waste management 14 10/10/2017 Training, Community leaders, 23 Participants (community MD Chisinau experts, representative leaders, business representatives, Moldova of Chisinau City representatives of District Department of Utilities, Utitilities Departments of Chisinau business representatives City Hall) received printed posters in ​waste​ ​management​ and actively participated in the training, asking questions and discussing key problems in waste management 15 10/10/2017 Training, Community
Recommended publications
  • 1 Country Visit: MOLDOVA Report of the Personal Representative of the OSCE Chair-In-Office on Combating Anti-Semitism Rabbi

    1 Country Visit: MOLDOVA Report of the Personal Representative of the OSCE Chair-In-Office on Combating Anti-Semitism Rabbi

    CIO.GAL/162/17 29 August 2017 ENGLISH only Country Visit: MOLDOVA Report of the Personal Representative of the OSCE Chair-in-Office on Combating Anti-Semitism Rabbi Andrew Baker February 28-March 4, 2017 Introductory Acknowledgments I want to thank the Government of Moldova for its exceptional cooperation and positive response to my request for meetings with officials at the highest levels. The ability to take up the issues of my mandate including topics of some controversy with them in direct conversation has made for a better understanding of the current situation and appreciation of their respective efforts. I am also especially grateful to Ambassador Michael Scanlan and his staff at the OSCE Mission to Moldova for their invaluable assistance in both the organization of my visit and in briefing me prior to my arrival in Chisinau and throughout my stay. I believe Ambassador Scanlan’s knowledge and guidance helped me to ask the right questions and look critically at the answers I received. ODIHR has worked closely with civil society partners in Moldova and helped prepare the ground for this visit. I am especially indebted to Jan Fahlbusch for his advice and involvement. A View from the Jewish Community By its own estimate the Jewish Community of Moldova numbers about 15,000. The community operates a Jewish library, two general Jewish schools and three synagogues, and it is nearly unique in having a unified presence on both banks of the Dniester. It is an aging community, with half its members older than 50, due in some measure to the steady rate of emigration.
  • Freedom House, Its Academic Advisers, and the Author(S) of This Report

    Freedom House, Its Academic Advisers, and the Author(S) of This Report

    Moldova By Victor Gotișan Capital: Chisinau Population: 3.5 Million GNI/capita, PPP: $5,670 Source: World Bank World Development Indicators. Nations in Transit Ratings and Averaged Scores 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 National Democratic 5.75 6.00 5.75 5.75 5.50 5.50 5.50 5.75 5.75 5.75 Governance Electoral Process 4.00 4.25 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 Civil Society 3.75 3.50 3.25 3.25 3.25 3.25 3.25 3.25 3.25 3.25 Independent Media 5.75 5.75 5.50 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 Local Democratic 5.75 5.75 5.75 5.75 5.75 5.75 5.75 5.50 5.50 5.50 Governance Judicial Framework 4.50 4.75 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.75 4.75 4.75 5.00 5.00 and Independence Corruption 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 5.75 5.75 5.75 6.00 6.00 6.00 Democracy Score 5.07 5.14 4.96 4.89 4.82 4.86 4.86 4.89 4.93 4.93 NOTE: The ratings reflect the consensus of Freedom House, its academic advisers, and the author(s) of this report. If consensus cannot be reached, Freedom House is responsible for the final ratings. The ratings are based on a scale of 1 to 7, with 1 representing the highest level of democratic progress and 7 the lowest.
  • The Republic of Moldova in the Framework of the Eastern Partnership and Prospects for Relations with the Russian Federation

    The Republic of Moldova in the Framework of the Eastern Partnership and Prospects for Relations with the Russian Federation

    Analele Universităţii din Oradea, Seria Relaţii Internaţionale şi Studii Europene, TOM X, pag. 143-169 THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA IN THE FRAMEWORK OF THE EASTERN PARTNERSHIP AND PROSPECTS FOR RELATIONS WITH THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION Victoria GOREAINOV* Mircea BRIE** Abstract. This paper is an in-depth analysis of the role of the Republic of Moldova in the Eastern Partnership and its influence on relations with the Russian Federation. The analysis of the role of the Republic of Moldova in the Eastern Partnership and the prospects for relations with the Russian Federation are necessary, given that the interests of the European Union and Russia intersect in Eastern Europe, and Moldova has been in the past 10 years between East and West. In the situation created Moldova finds itself between two regional powers – the EU and Russia. The European Union, as well as the Russian Federation, are major partners for the Republic of Moldova, and the orientation to the east or west often depends on political desire. The Republic of Moldova is one of the countries in Eastern Europe where Russia, by various methods, tries to maintain its influence, directing all forces against the EU enlargement to the East. In the context of the Republic of Moldova’s rapprochement with the EU, the main geostrategic interest of the Russian Federation is to maintain control over the former Soviet republics. And in order to maintain its status of great power, Russia needs to maintain its influence, including its military presence in Moldova, as a tool for exerting political pressure. However, the current reality, namely that the draft resolution proposed by the Republic of Moldova on “The complete and unconditional withdrawal of foreign military forces on the territory of the Republic of Moldova” was adopted at the UN General Assembly on June 22, 2018, questions the continuation of the presence Russian military in the Transnistrian region.

  • Public Opinion Survey: Residents of Moldova

    Public Opinion Survey: Residents of Moldova September-October 2017 Detailed Methodology • The survey was coordinated by Dr. Rasa Alisauskiene from Baltic Surveys/The Gallup Organization on behalf of the Center for Insights in Survey Research . The field work was carried out by Magenta Consulting . • Data was collected throughout Moldova (with the exception of Transnistria) between September 23 and October 17, 2017 through face-to-face interviews in respondents’ homes. • The sample consisted of 1,514 permanent residents of Moldova aged 18 and older and eligible to vote and is representative of the general population by age, gender, education, region and settlement size. • A multistage probability sampling method was used, with random route and next birthday respondent selection procedures. • Stage One: All districts of Moldova are grouped into 11 groups; all regions (with the exception of Transnistria) were surveyed. • Stage Two: Selection of the settlements (cities and villages). o Settlements were selected at random. o The number of settlements selected in each region was proportional to the share of population living in the particular type of the settlement in each region. • Stage Three: Primary sampling units were described. • Sampling frame: Moldova Statistical Databank. Weighting: Data weighted for 11 regional groups, urban/rural, and gender. • The margin of error does not exceed plus or minus 2.5 percent. • The response rate was 65 percent. • Charts and graphs may not add up to 100 percent due to rounding. • The survey was funded
  • Study on 2030 Overall Targets for the Energy Community

    Study on 2030 Overall Targets for the Energy Community

    Study on 2030 overall targets for the Energy Community Energy efficiency, RES, GHG emissions reduction TU Wien, EEG, REKK June 2019 www.energy-community.org This report was financed by the Energy Community. Final report Study on 2030 overall targets (energy efficiency, RES, GHG emissions reduction) for the Energy Community Authors: Gustav Resch, Albert Hiesl, Lukas Liebmann - TU Wien / EEG Andreas Türk, Dorian Frieden, Camilla Neumann … - Joanneum Research Laszlo Szabo, Andras Mezosi - REKK Vienna, 12 June 2019 Client: Energy Community Secretariat Lead partner: Technische Universität Wien (TU Wien), Energy Economics Group Gusshausstraße 25-29 / 370-3, A-1040 Vienna, Austria Contributing partners (subcontractors): Joanneum Research, Austria REKK, Hungary Final report – study on 2030 overall targets Table of contents 1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 5 1.1 Rationale / Understanding ........................................................................................................................................... 5 1.2 Objectives and expected results .................................................................................................................................. 6 1.3 Structure of this report ................................................................................................................................................ 6 2 Energy efficiency .............................................................................................................................
  • The Changing Governance of Higher Education Systems in Post-Soviet Countries”

    The Changing Governance of Higher Education Systems in Post-Soviet Countries”

    “The changing governance of higher education systems in Post-Soviet countries” von der Fakultät für Sozialwissenschaften und Philosophie der Universität Leipzig genehmigte D I S S E R T A T I O N zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades Dr. philosophiae (akademischer Grad) Dr. phil. (Kurzform) vorgelegt von Lukas Emanuel Bischof geboren am 10.02.1984 in Berlin Gutachter: Prof. Dr. Matthias Middel Prof. Dr. Stefan Troebst Tag der Verleihung 14.5.2019 page 1 Table of Contents Table of Figures ............................................................................................................................. 5 Preliminary remarks and acknowledgements .................................................................................. 6 Glossary ........................................................................................................................................... 8 1 Abstract ........................................................................................................................................ 11 2 Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 13 2.1 Research Topic ...................................................................................................................... 13 2.2 Starting point and personal research interest ......................................................................... 14 2.3 Research approach ................................................................................................................