DOCSLIB.ORG

The Prairie-Forest Border Ecoregion: a Conservation Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Prairie-Forest Border Ecoregion: a Conservation Plan photo: Thomas Meyer The Prairie-Forest Border Ecoregion: A conservation plan Prairie-Forest Border Prairie-Forest Border Ecoregion: A Conservation Plan Table of Contents I. Executive Summary Page 1 II. Acknowledgements Page 2 III. Context of the Ecoregion Page 2 IV. Description of the Ecoregion Page 3 · Physical Setting · Sections · Human Context V. Ecoregion-wide Threats Page 5 VI. Planning Process Page 7 · Phase I: Target Selection and Goal Setting · Phase II: Target Assessment · Phase III: Selection of Conservation Areas · Phase IV: Implementation · Lessons Learned VII. Conservation Goals Assessment Page 14 VIII. Information Management Page 18 IX. Information Gaps Page 19 X. Implementation/Next Steps Page 20 Glossary of Terms Sources of Data Maps Map 1: Context of Prairie-Forest Border Ecoregion Map 2: Map of Prairie-Forest Border Map 3: Section of Prairie-Forest Border Map 4: Urban Areas within Prairie-Forest Border Map 5: Ecological Drainage Units of Prairie-Forest Border Map 6: Untilled Landscapes of Prairie-Forest Border Map 7: Ecologically Significant Areas Map 7a: Ecologically Significant Areas of Minnesota Map 7b: Ecologically Significant Areas of Wisconsin Map 7c: Ecologically Significant Areas of Iowa Map 7d: Ecologically Significant Areas of Illinois Map 8: Ecologically Significant Areas by Category Tables Table 1: Natural Community Conservation Targets Table 2: Aquatic System Conservation Targets Table 3: Species Conservation Targets Table 4: Ecologically Significant Areas List Table 5: Conservation Targets by Ecologically Significant Areas Table 6: Summary of Conservation Goals Table 7: Prairie-Forest Border Goals Assessment Table 8: Geography of Hope Goals Assessment Appendices Appendix A: Experts involved in Planning Process Appendix B: Natural Heritage Program Ranking System Appendix C: Aquatic Classification System Appendix D: Important Bird Area Analysis Appendix E: Aquatic Target Assessment Appendix F: Plan Review Procedure I: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Prairie-Forest Border ecoregion is the transition zone, or “meeting place” between the tallgrass prairies and the northern forests. Much of the region was covered by successive waves of glaciers, and is composed of rolling hills and extensive flatlands formed by moraines, drumlin fields, pitted outwash, and glacial lakes. Approximately one-third of the ecoregion was unglaciated by the most recent wave of glaciers, and here the land is dissected by old and current waterways. Fire occurred regularly throughout most of the ecoregion, acting in concert with climate to create a shifting mosaic of prairie and forest, an ever-changing matrix of oak savanna, forest, and prairie. Many different plant communities occur within the ecoregion, including globally significant oak savannas, prairies, and algific talus slopes. Total acreage of oak savannas today is less than 1/100th of 1% of the pre- settlement extent, and prairies now cover less than 1/10th of 1% of their historic range in the ecoregion. Sixty-three plant and animal species occur within the ecoregion that are globally rare or federally listed. Thirteen plant communities, ten animal and six plant species are endemic to the ecoregion, found only in this part of the world. These endemics include several species of pleistocene-era land snails and the dwarf trout lily. Led by The Nature Conservancy, many conservation partners came together in a two-year ecoregional planning process to identify important Ecologically Significant Areas and restoration areas that will ensure the long-term survival of all viable native species and ecological communities. Conservation targets for the Prairie-Forest Border include all native natural communities, globally rare species and other species for whom experts feel the Prairie-Forest Border is an important part of their range. The expectation is that by protecting the best examples of all natural communities, we will conserve most of the species of the Prairie- Forest Border by providing adequate habitat for them, without requiring focused efforts for each species. We believe the coarse-filter approach is the most efficient method of capturing the full spectrum of biodiversity in the ecoregion. There were 84 rare species identified as conservation targets, and 107 plant community types. In addition, 24 aquatic community types, or ecological systems, were identified as conservation targets. Conservation goals were set for these targets based on global rank, historic patch size and proportion of historic range occurring in the ecoregion. These goals set the number and distribution of target occurrences within the ecoregion. Using available information about target occurrences, current status and resource needs of the conservation targets, as well as current conservation activity within the ecoregion, a set of ecologically significant areas was identified, places at which The Nature Conservancy and partners will work to preserve the species and communities of the ecoregion. Given the fragmented nature of the ecosystems within the Prairie-Forest Border, and the overall loss of habitat to urbanization and agriculture, the goals for many of the plant communities and target species have not been met in currently intact landscapes, making restoration vital to the creation of a network of viable habitats. One hundred and sixty-six conservation areas, called Ecologically Significant Areas, have been selected for conservation of the biodiversity of the Prairie-Forest Border ecoregion. Many of these areas are large, landscape-scale sites which encompass terrestrial, aquatic and important migratory bird area site components, as well as rare species occurrences. Within many of these areas are concentrations of conservation targets, and many areas encompass current conservation projects. Conservation action will work to maintain the ecological integrity of the landscape context of the areas, as well as focusing on abating the threats to the targets found at the Ecologically Significant Areas. Conservation areas were chosen which will maximize conservation by protecting the highest-quality occurrences of ecoregional targets, and which will protect multiple targets within an area. 1 Land development for residential or commercial uses, incompatible agricultural practices, exotic species and fire exclusion were identified as the primary threats facing conservation targets throughout the ecoregion. Several ecoregion-wide strategies have been identified to abate these threats, including traditional protection actions as well as more innovative outreach and partnership efforts. Many of these strategies will have conservation impacts beyond the Prairie-Forest Border ecoregion, and should be coordinated among adjoining ecoregions. Another key threat to the conservation of biodiversity in the Prairie-Forest Border is the small size of conservation areas and a lack of connectivity among them. The need for connectivity among Ecologically Significant Areas, establishing a network of protected areas for large-ranging mammals, migratory birds and aquatic organisms is an issue to be addressed in future revisions of the ecoregional plan. II: ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This conservation plan for the Prairie-Forest Border ecoregion is the result of two years of hard work by many individuals. The Core Team of planners consisted of Conservancy and Heritage staff from each of the four states: Illinois Lisa Haderlein, Director of Conservation Operations, The Nature Conservancy Tim Tear, Director of Conservation Science, The Nature Conservancy Iowa Keith Fletcher, Landscape Conservation Project Manager, The Nature Conservancy John Pearson, IA Department of Natural Resources Gerry Selby, Director of Science and Stewardship, The Nature Conservancy Minnesota Hannah Dunevitz, Regional Plant Ecologist, MN Department of Natural Resources Garth Fuller, Land Steward, The Nature Conservancy Wisconsin Karen Bassler, Conservation Coordinator, The Nature Conservancy Eric Epstein, Ecologist, WI Department of Natural Resources Deirdre Gruendler, Conservation Planner, The Nature Conservancy Paul West, Stewardship Ecologist, The Nature Conservancy From the beginning, Wayne Ostlie of the Midwest Resource Office and later of Weather Creek Conservation Consultants provided invaluable assistance in both the planning process and assessment of targets. In addition, Mary Lammert and Tom Fitzhugh of the Freshwater Initiative of The Nature Conservancy worked with Shelly Miller of the Conservancy on the aquatic assessment for the ecoregion. Many others provided invaluable assistance in assessing targets, identifying ecologically significant areas and in many other ways. These partners are listed in Appendix A. III: CONTEXT OF THE ECOREGION As the name implies, the Prairie-Forest Border ecoregion (PFB) is a large transition zone between the former tallgrass prairies and the northern forests. As a transition zone, the PFB serves as a large-scale ecotone. The general vegetation pattern of this ecoregion is thus very different from many other ecoregions—rather than extensive examples of one or two matrix communities, such as northern hardwoods to the north or tallgrass prairies to the south, the matrix of the PFB is an aggregate of many large patch communities of forests, savannas, and grasslands. There is a constant tension among these community types. This tension is the result of the interaction among northern, continental and moist warm Gulf of Mexico weather patterns, in addition to regular episodes of fire, geologic history and landform patterns.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Lexicon of Pleistocene Stratigraphic Units of Wisconsin
    Lexicon of Pleistocene Stratigraphic Units of Wisconsin ON ATI RM FO K CREE MILLER 0 20 40 mi Douglas Member 0 50 km Lake ? Crab Member EDITORS C O Kent M. Syverson P P Florence Member E R Lee Clayton F Wildcat A Lake ? L L Member Nashville Member John W. Attig M S r ik be a F m n O r e R e TRADE RIVER M a M A T b David M. Mickelson e I O N FM k Pokegama m a e L r Creek Mbr M n e M b f a e f lv m m i Sy e l M Prairie b C e in Farm r r sk er e o emb lv P Member M i S ill S L rr L e A M Middle F Edgar ER M Inlet HOLY HILL V F Mbr RI Member FM Bakerville MARATHON Liberty Grove M Member FM F r Member e E b m E e PIERCE N M Two Rivers Member FM Keene U re PIERCE A o nm Hersey Member W le FM G Member E Branch River Member Kinnickinnic K H HOLY HILL Member r B Chilton e FM O Kirby Lake b IG Mbr Boundaries Member m L F e L M A Y Formation T s S F r M e H d l Member H a I o V r L i c Explanation o L n M Area of sediment deposited F e m during last part of Wisconsin O b er Glaciation, between about R 35,000 and 11,000 years M A Ozaukee before present.
    [Show full text]
  • Filogeografía De Systrophia Helicycloides: El Reflejo De La Dinámica Del Bosque Lluvioso Tropical En Los Genes 16S Rrna Y COI De Moluscos Terrestres
    UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL MAYOR DE SAN MARCOS FACULTAD DE CIENCIAS BIOLÓGICAS UNIDAD DE POSTGRADO Filogeografía de Systrophia helicycloides: el reflejo de la dinámica del bosque lluvioso tropical en los genes 16S rRNA y COI de moluscos terrestres TESIS para optar el grado académico de Magíster en Biología Molecular AUTOR Pedro Eduardo Romero Condori ASESORA Rina L. Ramírez Mesias Lima – Perú 2010 "In the end, we will conserve only what we love; we will love only what we understand; and we will understand only what we are taught." (Baba Dioum, 1968) ii Para Katherine ¡buenas salenas! iii AGRADECIMIENTOS A Emma, por continuar apoyándome en esta aventura, día tras día, y a Pedro por acompañarme ahora desde un buen lugar, para toda la vida. A la Dra. Rina Ramírez, por enseñarme a buscar las preguntas, y encontrar las respuestas a este “misterio de los misterios”, tal como llamaba Charles Darwin al origen de las especies. Es una suerte tenerla como referente académico, y más aún como ejemplo de vida. Este trabajo pudo ser realizado gracias al apoyo de la Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos a través del Vicerrectorado de Investigación y el Instituto de Ciencias Biológicas Antonio Raimondi que aprobaron los proyectos: “Evaluación de la biodiversidad de moluscos en la región del río Bajo Madre de Dios”, “Diversidad genética en la Amazonia: Polimorfismo del genoma mitocondrial de moluscos terrestres de la familia Systrophiidae” y “Biodiversidad de la Familia Systrophiidae (Mollusca, Gastropoda) en la cuenca del Río Los Amigos (Dpto. Madre de Dios). Al Concejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONCYTEC), por la beca para finalizar mis estudios de maestría, fue un honor ser elegido en este grupo de jóvenes profesionales peruanos ganadores de una beca de posgrado en 2008, esta tesis es un sincero esfuerzo para retribuir la confianza y el apoyo prestado.
    [Show full text]
  • Key Points for Sustainable Management of Northern Great Plains Grasslands
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by Public Research Access Institutional Repository and Information Exchange South Dakota State University Open PRAIRIE: Open Public Research Access Institutional Repository and Information Exchange Natural Resource Management Faculty Publications Department of Natural Resource Management 2019 Looking to the Future: Key Points for Sustainable Management of Northern Great Plains Grasslands Lora B. Perkins Marissa Ahlering Diane L. Larson Follow this and additional works at: https://openprairie.sdstate.edu/nrm_pubs Part of the Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons, and the Environmental Sciences Commons REVIEW ARTICLE Looking to the future: key points for sustainable management of northern Great Plains grasslands Lora B. Perkins1,2 , Marissa Ahlering3, Diane L. Larson4 The grasslands of the northern Great Plains (NGP) region of North America are considered endangered ecosystems and priority conservation areas yet have great ecological and economic importance. Grasslands in the NGP are no longer self-regulating adaptive systems. The challenges to these grasslands are widespread and serious (e.g. climate change, invasive species, fragmentation, altered disturbance regimes, and anthropogenic chemical loads). Because the challenges facing the region are dynamic, complex, and persistent, a paradigm shift in how we approach restoration and management of the grasslands in the NGP is imperative. The goal of this article is to highlight four key points for land managers and restoration practitioners to consider when planning management or restoration actions. First, we discuss the appropriateness of using historical fidelity as a restoration or management target because of changing climate, widespread pervasiveness of invasive species, the high level of fragmentation, and altered disturbance regimes.
    [Show full text]
  • Threatened & Endangered Species
    Threatened & Endangered Species Iowa Animal ID Guide September 2011 Amphibians Butterflies Fresh Water Mussels Mammals Birds Fish Land Snails Reptiles A special thanks to the Iowa Department of Natural Resources for providing content to this guide. Natural Resources Conservation Service Helping People Help the Land www.ia.nrcs.usda.gov USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. How to use the Threatened & Endangered Species Iowa Animal ID Guide: • Endangered species are fish, plant life, or wildlife in danger of extinction throughout all or a significant part of its range. • Threatened species likely become endangered within the foreseeable future throughout all or a significant part of its range. • Orange color-coded species are Iowa’s endangered animal species. They are listed in alphabetical order by common name. • Blue color-coded species are Iowa’s threatened animal species. They are also listed in alphabetical order by common name. • The scientific name for each species is listed below the common name. • Maps on each page highlight the species range in Iowa. Counties filled with a lighter color are only federally protected, while those with a darker color are both state and federally protected. Categories for each species: Amphibians Fish Mammals Birds Fresh Water Mussels Butterflies Land Snails Reptiles Endangered Animal Species Barn owl Tyto alba Habitat Nests and roosts in dark, secluded places. Often found in old barns and abandoned buildings. Barn owls hunt in grassland habitats along field edges, fence rows, and wetland edges where pray is most available. Appropriate practices • Establish grassland to attract prey (200 acres adjacent to potential barn nesting sites can produce good results).
    [Show full text]
  • Read the Complete Nutrient Petition to Epa Here
    BEFORE THE UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY OFFICE OF WATER Petition for Rulemaking ) Under the Clean Water Act ) Numeric Water Quality Standards for ) Nitrogen and Phosphorus for the ) Ohio River and its Tributaries and for a ) TMDL for Nitrogen and ) Phosphorus for the Ohio River ) ________________________________________ Sierra Club, including its Kentucky Chapter, Pennsylvania Chapter, West Virginia Chapter, Indiana Chapter, Illinois Chapter, Tennessee Chapter, Iowa Chapter, and Sierra Club Ohio, members of the Mississippi River Collaborative (MRC), including Healthy Gulf, Prairie Rivers Network and Tennessee Clean Water Network, Concerned Ohio River Residents, Hoosier Environmental Council, Ohio Environmental Council, Ohio River Foundation, Ohio Valley Environmental Coalition, Ohio River Waterkeeper, Valley Watch, West Virginia Rivers Coalition (collectively “Petitioners”) petition for Rulemaking under the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. § 553, and the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S. C. §1251 et seq., for Numeric Water Quality Standards for Nitrogen (N) and Phosphorus (P) for the Ohio River and its tributaries and for a Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) for N and P for the Ohio River. The Ohio River and many of its tributaries have suffered from nutrient pollution-related eutrophication from manmade chemicals and human activities, posing a severe threat to human health and the environment. This eutrophication is chronic and is caused by and chronically caused mainly by N and P pollution. The last four years of U.S. EPA
    [Show full text]
  • The Eastern Africa Coastal Forests Ecoregion
    The Eastern Africa Coastal Forests Ecoregion Strategic Framework for Conservation 2005 – 2025 Strategic Framework for Conservation (2005–2025) The Eastern Afrca Coastal Forests Ecoregon Strategc Framework for Conservaton 2005–2025 The Eastern Africa Coastal Forests Ecoregion Publshed August 2006 Editor: Kimunya Mugo Design and layout: Anthony Mwangi Cover design: Kimunya Mugo Front cover main photo: WWF-EARPO / John SALEHE Front cover other photos: WWF-UK / Brent STIRTON / Getty Images Back cover photo: WWF-EARPO / John SALEHE Photos: John Salehe, David Maingi and Neil Burgess or as credited. © Graphics (2006) WWF-EARPO. All rights reserved. The material and geographic designations in this report do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of WWF concerning the legal status of any country, territory or area or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers and boundaries. WWF Eastern Africa Regional Programme Office ACS Plaza, Lenana Road P.O. Box 62440-00200 Nairobi, Kenya Tel: +254 20 3877355, 3872630/1 Fax: +254 20 3877389 E-mail: [email protected] Web: www.panda.org/earpo Strategic Framework for Conservation (2005–2025) Contents Acknowledgements......................................................................................................... iv Foreword........................................................................................................................... v Lst of abbrevatons and acronyms.............................................................................. v A new approach to
    [Show full text]
  • DRAFT- April 2003
    City of Carlos WELLHEAD PROTECTION PLAN Part 2: Potential Contaminant Source Inventory Impacts of Expected Changes to Land and Water Resources Issues, Problems & Opportunities Wellhead Protection Plan Goals Management Strategies Evaluation Plan Emergency/Contingency Plan July 2019 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Number I. PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY PROFILE 3 II. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 III. CHAPTER 1 - Data Elements, Assessment 9 IV. CHAPTER 2 - Impact of Changes on Public Water Supply Well(s) 13 V. CHAPTER 3 - Issues, Problems and Opportunities 15 VI. CHAPTER 4 - Wellhead Protection Goals 17 VII. CHAPTER 5 - Objectives and Plans of Action 17 VIII. CHAPTER 6 - Evaluation Program 26 IX. CHAPTER 7 - Alternative Water Supply; Contingency Strategy 27 X. APPENDIX A - Referenced Data for Part 2 39 Acronym List Glossary of Terms Exhibit 1: Political Boundaries & Land Survey Map Exhibit 2: Land Cover Map Exhibit 3: Consumer Confidence Report Exhibit 4: PCSI List and Map Exhibit 5: Zoning & Comprehensive Land Use Map Exhibit 6: Parcel Boundary Map Exhibit 7: WHP Plan Part 1 Exhibit 8: Watershed Map 2 PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY PROFILE PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY NAME: City of Carlos ADDRESS: PO Box 276, Carlos, Minnesota 56319-0276 TELEPHONE NUMBER: 320-852-3000 E-MAIL: [email protected] WELLHEAD PROTECTION MANAGER NAME: Jeff Gunderson, Water Operator ADDRESS: PO Box 276, Carlos, Minnesota 56319-0276 TELEPHONE NUMBER: 320-852-3000 E-MAIL: [email protected] TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE NAME: Aaron Meyer, MRWA ADDRESS: Minnesota Rural Water Association 217 12th Ave SE Elbow Lake, MN 56531 TELEPHONE NUMBER: 320-808-7293 E-MAIL: [email protected] 3 PART 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This portion of the wellhead protection (WHP) plan for the City of Carlos includes: • the results of the Potential Contaminant Source Inventory, • the Wellhead Protection Management Strategies, • the Emergency/Alternative Water Supply Contingency Plan, and • the Wellhead Protection Program Evaluation Plan.
    [Show full text]
  • Grasslands 4/16/03 3:46 PM
    Ecoregion: Grasslands 4/16/03 3:46 PM Grasslands INTRODUCTION About 25% of Earth’s land surface is covered by temperate grassland. These large expanses of flat or hilly country cover much of North America, as well as large areas of Europe, Asia, and South America. Most grasslands are found in the interiors of continents, where there is too little rainfall for a forest but too much rain for a desert. Art Explosion Art Explosion Rolling hills covered with grasses and very few trees A few scattered trees are found on savannas, are typical of North American grassland prairies. tropical grasslands of Africa. Temperate grasslands have subtle differences and different names throughout the world. Prairies and plains of North America are grasslands with tall grasses, while the steppes of Russia are grasslands with short grasses. Veldts are found in South Africa, the puszta in Hungary, and the pampas in Argentina and Uruguay. Savannas are tropical grasslands that support scattered trees and shrubs. They often form a transitional biome file:///Ecoregion/grass/content.html Page 1 of 6 Ecoregion: Grasslands 4/16/03 3:46 PM between deserts and rain forests. Some temperate grasslands are also called savannas. The word savanna comes from the Spanish word zavanna, meaning “treeless plain.” Savannas cover almost half of Africa (mostly central Africa) and large areas of Australia and South America. ABIOTIC DATA The grassland climate is rather dry, averaging about 20 to 100 centimeters (8–40 inches) of precipitation a year. Summers are very hot and may reach 45°C (113°F). Winter temperatures often fall below freezing, which is 0°C (32°F).
    [Show full text]
  • Native Or Suitable Plants City of Mccall
    Native or Suitable Plants City of McCall The following list of plants is presented to assist the developer, business owner, or homeowner in selecting plants for landscaping. The list is by no means complete, but is a recommended selection of plants which are either native or have been successfully introduced to our area. Successful landscaping, however, requires much more than just the selection of plants. Unless you have some experience, it is suggested than you employ the services of a trained or otherwise experienced landscaper, arborist, or forester. For best results it is recommended that careful consideration be made in purchasing the plants from the local nurseries (i.e. Cascade, McCall, and New Meadows). Plants brought in from the Treasure Valley may not survive our local weather conditions, microsites, and higher elevations. Timing can also be a serious consideration as the plants may have already broken dormancy and can be damaged by our late frosts. Appendix B SELECTED IDAHO NATIVE PLANTS SUITABLE FOR VALLEY COUNTY GROWING CONDITIONS Trees & Shrubs Acer circinatum (Vine Maple). Shrub or small tree 15-20' tall, Pacific Northwest native. Bright scarlet-orange fall foliage. Excellent ornamental. Alnus incana (Mountain Alder). A large shrub, useful for mid to high elevation riparian plantings. Good plant for stream bank shelter and stabilization. Nitrogen fixing root system. Alnus sinuata (Sitka Alder). A shrub, 6-1 5' tall. Grows well on moist slopes or stream banks. Excellent shrub for erosion control and riparian restoration. Nitrogen fixing root system. Amelanchier alnifolia (Serviceberry). One of the earlier shrubs to blossom out in the spring.
    [Show full text]
  • Taiga Plains
    ECOLOGICAL REGIONS OF THE NORTHWEST TERRITORIES Taiga Plains Ecosystem Classification Group Department of Environment and Natural Resources Government of the Northwest Territories Revised 2009 ECOLOGICAL REGIONS OF THE NORTHWEST TERRITORIES TAIGA PLAINS This report may be cited as: Ecosystem Classification Group. 2007 (rev. 2009). Ecological Regions of the Northwest Territories – Taiga Plains. Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Government of the Northwest Territories, Yellowknife, NT, Canada. viii + 173 pp. + folded insert map. ISBN 0-7708-0161-7 Web Site: http://www.enr.gov.nt.ca/index.html For more information contact: Department of Environment and Natural Resources P.O. Box 1320 Yellowknife, NT X1A 2L9 Phone: (867) 920-8064 Fax: (867) 873-0293 About the cover: The small photographs in the inset boxes are enlarged with captions on pages 22 (Taiga Plains High Subarctic (HS) Ecoregion), 52 (Taiga Plains Low Subarctic (LS) Ecoregion), 82 (Taiga Plains High Boreal (HB) Ecoregion), and 96 (Taiga Plains Mid-Boreal (MB) Ecoregion). Aerial photographs: Dave Downing (Timberline Natural Resource Group). Ground photographs and photograph of cloudberry: Bob Decker (Government of the Northwest Territories). Other plant photographs: Christian Bucher. Members of the Ecosystem Classification Group Dave Downing Ecologist, Timberline Natural Resource Group, Edmonton, Alberta. Bob Decker Forest Ecologist, Forest Management Division, Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Government of the Northwest Territories, Hay River, Northwest Territories. Bas Oosenbrug Habitat Conservation Biologist, Wildlife Division, Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Government of the Northwest Territories, Yellowknife, Northwest Territories. Charles Tarnocai Research Scientist, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Ottawa, Ontario. Tom Chowns Environmental Consultant, Powassan, Ontario. Chris Hampel Geographic Information System Specialist/Resource Analyst, Timberline Natural Resource Group, Edmonton, Alberta.
    [Show full text]
  • April 2013 Volume 40 Number 4
    APRIL 2013 VOLUME 40 NUMBER 4 Conservation Leadership Corps nterested in being a leader in con- opportunity to network with state, fed- iservation? eral and private conservation organi- Interested in having your voice zations. heard on conservation issues by Wiscon- All your expenses for involvement in sin and National policymakers? the program will be paid for by the Wis- The Wisconsin Wildlife Federation consin Wildlife Federation. At the suc- is creating a Conservation Leadership cessful completion of the program you Training Program for you! will receive a $250 scholarship to further We welcome high school students in your conservation education! their junior/senior year or freshman/ Please visit our website: www.wiwf. sophomore college students to receive org for further details. You may also con- training in conservation leadership, con- tact Leah McSherry, WWF Conservation servation policy development and how to Leadership Corps Coordinator at lmc- advocate for sound conservation policies. [email protected] or George Meyer, WWF Training will be provided by experienced Executive Director at georgemeyer@tds. conservation leaders. net with any questions or to express your Training will provide an excellent interest in the program. General Information on the Conservation Leadership Corps he Board of Directors of and presented conservation reso- didates are encouraged to attend Tthe Wisconsin Wildlife lutions may be adopted by WWF most, if not all, of these events. Federation (WWF) has to serve as official policies. All expenses encountered while initiated an exciting new program Training will be provided by participating in the CLC program to assist in the development of fu- current and former natural re- will be covered by WWF.
    [Show full text]
  • Driftless Area National Wildlife Refuge
    DRIFTLESS AREA NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE McGregor, Iowa ANNUAL NARRATIVE REPORT FY2006 DRIFTLESS AREA NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE McGregor, Iowa Fiscal Year 2006 _________________________ Prepared by Date _________________________ ______________________________ Refuge Manager Date Complex Manager Date ______________________________ Regional Chief, NWRS Date INTRODUCTION 1. Location The Driftless Area National Wildlife Refuge was established in 1989 for the protection and recovery of the threatened Northern monkshood and endangered Iowa Pleistocene snail. These species occur on a rare habitat type termed algific talus slopes. These are slopes with outflows of cold underground air that provide a glacial relict habitat to which certain species have adapted (see diagram below). The Driftless Area National Wildlife Refuge consists of ten units scattered throughout Allamakee, Clayton, Dubuque, and Jackson Counties in northeast Iowa. Total Refuge acreage is 811 acres with individual units ranging from 6 to 208 acres. Acquisition targets not only the algific slope, but surrounding buffer habitat that includes sinkholes important to air flow to the slope. Acquisition is ongoing, but limited due to insufficient funds. 2. Topography Refuge units are primarily forested and generally consist of steep topography with narrow creek valleys, large rock outcroppings, and karst features. Riparian and grassland habitat also occur on the Refuge. 3. Points of Interest The algific talus slope habitat of the Refuge harbors many unusual and rare plant and land snail species, some of which are also on the state threatened and endangered species list. These areas tend to be scenic with cliffs and rock outcroppings, springs, and coldwater streams. 4. Physical Facilities The Refuge office is located at the McGregor District of the Upper Mississippi River National Wildlife and Fish Refuge, McGregor, Iowa.
    [Show full text]