Offensive Efficiency

OFFENSIVE EFFICIENCY BREAKDOWN In this Thunder Stat Lab activity, we look at calculating Offensive Efficiency (OE). An individual’s offensive efficiency attempts to approximate the total points generated by an individual per possession, or, figuring out just how many points a player is likely to generate when he/she tries. Below is the expression for OE: FGM + A OE = FGA - OREB + A + TO FGM (field goals made): total number of field goals made (2pt or 3pt), does not include free throws A (assist): when a player passes the basketball to a teammate, and the teammate scores a basket FGA (field goals attempted): total number of field goals shot (includes both misses and makes), does not include free throws OREB (offensive rebound): when a player on offense secures a rebound after their teammate has missed a shot TO (turnover): when a player loses possession of the basketball to the opposing team Below are the variables and OE output from the Oklahoma City Thunder starting five players in the win over the Golden State Warriors on October 27th, 2019. PLAYER A PLAYER B PLAYER C PLAYER D PLAYER E FGM 5 5 4 2 8 FGA 11 7 8 5 14 ASSIST 0 4 3 2 4 TO 3 1 1 0 3 OREB 0 0 5 3 4 OE 0.36 0.75 1.0 1.0 0.71 okcthunder.com/statlab 1 OFFENSIVE EFFICIENCY LET’S PRACTICE Let’s calculate OE on our own. Complete the table below by calculating each player’s OE, when simplifying don’t forget to round to the nearest hundredth, or the second number to the right of the decimal. Once you’ve completed the table, answer the questions below. FGM + A 1. Rank the players in order based on their OE from greatest to least. OE = FGA - OREB + A + TO PLAYER A PLAYER B PLAYER C FGM 6 11 8 FGA 19 22 16 ASSIST 6 5 2 TO 5 3 0 OREB 0 2 6 OE 2. If you were a coach, what is one thing you would have each player focus on to increase their OE? a. Player A: b. Player B: c. Player C: okcthunder.com/statlab 2 OFFENSIVE EFFICIENCY 3. Look at the table below, take what we’ve learned about the equation and fill in the missing values to complete the table. PLAYER A PLAYER B FGM 8 4 FGA 8 ASSIST 1 0 TO 2 3 OREB 0 OE 0.56 0.8 4. Now that we’ve learned about OE, we know a player can have a high OE by making shots, creating assists, and collecting offensive rebounds, and a player’s OE will decrease when the miss shots and turn the ball over. What do you think is the most important component to have a high OE? okcthunder.com/statlab 3.

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Play by Play JPN 87 Vs 71 FRA FIRST QUARTER
Saitama Super Arena Basketball さいたまスーパーアリーナバスケットボール / Basketball Super Arena de Saitama Women 女子 / Femmes FRI 6 AUG 2021 Semifinal Start Time: 20:00 準決勝 / Demi-finale Play by Play プレーバイプレー / Actions de jeux Game 48 JPN 87 vs 71 FRA (14-22, 27-12, 27-16, 19-21) Game Duration: 1:31 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Scoring by 5 min intervals: JPN 9 14 28 41 56 68 78 87 FRA 11 22 27 34 44 50 57 71 Quarter Starters: FIRST QUARTER JPN 8 TAKADA M 13 MACHIDA R 27 HAYASHI S 52 MIYAZAWA Y 88 AKAHO H FRA 5 MIYEM E 7 GRUDA S 10 MICHEL S 15 WILLIAMS G 39 DUCHET A Game JPN - Japan Score Diff. FRA - France Time 10:00 8 TAKADA M Jump ball lost 7 GRUDA S Jump ball won 15 WILLIAMS G 2PtsFG inside paint, Driving Layup made (2 9:41 0-2 2 Pts) 8 TAKADA M 2PtsFG inside paint, Layup made (2 Pts), 13 9:19 2-2 0 MACHIDA R Assist (1) 9:00 52 MIYAZAWA Y Defensive rebound (1) 10 MICHEL S 2PtsFG inside paint, Driving Layup missed 52 MIYAZAWA Y 2PtsFG inside paint, Layup made (2 Pts), 13 8:40 4-2 2 MACHIDA R Assist (2) 8:40 10 MICHEL S Personal foul, 1 free throw awarded (P1,T1) 8:40 52 MIYAZAWA Y Foul drawn 8:40 52 MIYAZAWA Y Free Throw made 1 of 1 (3 Pts) 5-2 3 8:28 52 MIYAZAWA Y Defensive rebound (2) 10 MICHEL S 2PtsFG inside paint, Driving Layup missed 8:11 52 MIYAZAWA Y 3PtsFG missed 15 WILLIAMS G Defensive rebound (1) 8:03 5-4 1 15 WILLIAMS G 2PtsFG fast break, Driving Layup made (4 Pts) 88 AKAHO H 2PtsFG inside paint, Layup made (2 Pts), 13 7:53 7-4 3 MACHIDA R Assist (3) 7:36 39 DUCHET A 2PtsFG outside paint, Pullup Jump Shot missed 7:34 Defensive Team rebound (1) 7:14 13 MACHIDA
[Show full text]
Coaches Handbook
City of Buckeye COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT -Recreation Division- COACHES HANDBOOK Important dates Opening day: Saturday, June 16th Picture day: Tuesday, June 19th and Thursday, June 21st Last day: Saturday, July 28th Peter Piper pizza party nights: TBD Community Services Department’s Vision and Mission Statement Our Vision “Buckeye Is An Active, Engaged and Vibrant Community.” Our Mission We are dedicated to enriching quality of life, managing natural resources and creating memorable experiences for all generations. .We do this by: Developing quality parks, diverse programs and sustainable practices. Promoting volunteerism and lifelong learning. Cultivating community events, tourism and economic development. Preserving cultural, natural and historic resources. Offering programs that inspire personal growth, healthy lifestyles and sense of community. Dear Coach: Thank you for volunteering to coach with the City of Buckeye Youth Sports Program. The role of a youth sports coach can be very rewarding, but can be challenging at times as well. We have included helpful information in this handbook to assist in making this an enjoyable season for you and your team. Our youth sports philosophy is to provide our youth with a positive athletic experience in a safe environment where fun, skill development, teamwork, and sportsmanship lay its foundation. In addition, our youth sports programs is designed to encourage maximum participation by all team members; their development is far more important than the outcome of the game. Please be sure to remember you are dealing with children, in a child’s game, where the best motivation of all is enthusiasm, positive reinforcement and team success. If the experience is fun for you, it will also be fun for the kids on your team as well as their parents.
[Show full text]
The Evolution of Basketball Statistics Is Finally Here
ows ind Sta W tis l t Ready for a ic n i S g i o r f t O w a e r h e TURBOSTATS SOFTWARE T The Evolution of Basketball Statistics is Finally Here All New Advanced Metrics, Efficiencies and Four Factors Outstanding Live Scoring BoxScore & Play-by-Play Easy to Learn Automatically Tags Video Fast Substitutions The Worlds Most Color-Coded Shot Advanced Live Game Charts Display... Scoring Software Uncontested Shots Shots off Turnovers View Career Shooting% Second Chance Shots After Each Shot Shots in Transition Includes the Advanced Zones vs Man to Man Statistics Used by Top Last Second Shots Pro & College Teams Blocked Shots New NET Rating System Score Live or by Video Highlights the Most Sort Video Clips Efficient Players Create Highlight Films Includes the eBook Theory of Evolution Creates CyberLink Explaining How the New PowerDirector video Formulas Help You Win project files for DVDs* The Only Software that PowerDirector 12/2010 Tracks Actual Rebound % Optional Player Photos Statistics for Individual Customizable Display Plays and Options Shows Four Factors, Event List, Player Team Stats by Point Guard Simulated image on the Statistics or Scouting Samsung ATIV SmartPC. Actual Screen Size is 11.5 Per Minute Statistics for Visit Samsung.com for tablet All Categories pricing and availability Imports Game Data from * PowerDirector sold separately NCAA BoxScores (Websites HTML or PDF) Runs Standalone on all Windows Laptops, Tablets and UltraBooks. Also tracks ... XP, Vista, 7 plus Windows 8 Pro Effective Field Goal%, True Shooting%, Turnover%, Offensive Rebound%, Individual Possessions, Broadcasts data to iPads and Offensive Efficiency, Time in Game Phones with a low cost app +/- Five Player Combos, Score on the Only Tablets Designed for Data Entry Defensive Points Given Up and more..
[Show full text]
Difference-Based Analysis of the Impact of Observed Game Parameters on the Final Score at the FIBA Eurobasket Women 2019
Original Article Difference-based analysis of the impact of observed game parameters on the final score at the FIBA Eurobasket Women 2019 SLOBODAN SIMOVIĆ1 , JASMIN KOMIĆ2, BOJAN GUZINA1, ZORAN PAJIĆ3, TAMARA KARALIĆ1, GORAN PAŠIĆ1 1Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, University of Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina 2Faculty of Economy, University of Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina 3Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, University of Belgrade, Serbia ABSTRACT Evaluation in women's basketball is keeping up with developments in evaluation in men’s basketball, and although the number of studies in women's basketball has seen a positive trend in the past decade, it is still at a low level. This paper observed 38 games and sixteen variables of standard efficiency during the FIBA EuroBasket Women 2019. Two regression models were obtained, a set of relative percentage and relative rating variables, which are used in the NBA league, where the dependent variable was the number of points scored. The obtained results show that in the first model, the difference between winning and losing teams was made by three variables: true shooting percentage, turnover percentage of inefficiency and efficiency percentage of defensive rebounds, which explain 97.3%, while for the second model, the distinguishing variables was offensive efficiency, explaining for 96.1% of the observed phenomenon. There is a continuity of the obtained results with the previous championship, played in 2017. Of all the technical elements of basketball, it is still the shots made, assists and defensive rebounds that have the most significant impact on the final score in European women’s basketball.
[Show full text]
Competition Wrongs Abstract
NICOLAS CORNELL Competition Wrongs abstract. In both philosophical and legal circles, it is typically assumed that wrongs depend upon having one’s rights violated. But within any market-based economy, market participants may be wronged by the conduct of other actors in the marketplace. Due to my illicit business tactics, you may lose profits, customers, employees, reputation, access to capital, or any number of other sources of value. This Article argues that such competition wrongs are an example of wrongs that arise without an underlying right, contrary to the typical philosophical and legal assumption. The Article thus draws upon various forms of business law to illustrate what is a conceptual point: that we can and do wrong one another in ways that do not involve violating our private entitlements but rather violating only public norms. author. Assistant Professor, University of Michigan Law School. This Article has benefitted from comments and suggestions from many others. Specifically, I would like to thank Mitch Ber- man, Dan Crane, Ryan Doerfler, Chris Essert, Rich Friedman, John Goldberg, Don Herzog, Wa- heed Hussain, Julian Jonker, Greg Keating, Greg Klass, George Letsas, Gabe Mendlow, Sanjukta Paul, Tony Reeves, Arthur Ripstein, Amy Sepinwall, Henry Smith, Sabine Tsuruda, David Wad- dilove, and Gary Watson. I am also grateful to audiences at Binghamton, Bowdoin, Harvard, IN- SEED, Michigan, Oxford, Penn, and Virginia, as well as the Bechtel Workshop in Moral and Po- litical Philosophy, the Legal Philosophy Workshop, and the North American Workshop on Private Law Theory. 2030 thecompetition claims of wrongs official reason article contents introduction 2032 i.
[Show full text]
The Unseen Play the Game to Win 03/22/2017
The Unseen Play the Game to Win 03/22/2017 Play the Game to Win What Rick Barry and the Atlanta Falcons can teach us about risk management “Something about the crowd transforms the way you think” – Malcolm Gladwell - Revisionist History With 4:45 remaining in Super Bowl LI, Matt Ryan, the Atlanta Falcons quarterback, threw a pass to Julio Jones who made an amazing catch. The play did not stand out because of the way the ball was thrown or the agility that Jones employed to make the catch, but due to the fact that the catch eas- ily put the Falcons in field goal range very late in the game. That reception should have been the play of the game, but it was not. Instead, Tom Brady walked off the field with the MVP trophy and the Patriots celebrated yet another Super Bowl victory. NBA basketball hall of famer Rick Barry shot close to 90% from the free throw line. What made him memorable was not just his free throw percentage or his hard fought play, but the way he shot the ball underhanded, “granny-style”, when taking free throws. Every basketball player, coach and fan clearly understands that the goal of a basketball game is to score the most points and win. Rick Bar- ry, however, was one of the very few that understood it does not matter how you win but most im- portantly if you win. The Atlanta Falcons crucial mistake and Rick Barry’s “granny” shooting style offer stark illustrations about how human beings guard their egos and at times do imprudent things in order to be viewed favorably by their peers and the public.
[Show full text]
FIBA Official Interpretations 2019, JAN 2019
2020 OFFICIAL BASKETBALL RULES OBRI – OFFICIAL INTERPRETATIONS Valid as of 1st January 2021 1 January 2021 version 2.0 Official Basketball Rules 2020 Official Interpretations Valid as of 1st January 2021 The colours demonstrate the content that was updated. (Yellow version) Page 2 of 112 OFFICIAL BASKETBALL RULES INTERPRETATIONS 1 January 2021 version 2.0 In case you find any inconsistency or error, please report the problem to: [email protected] 1 January 2021 version 2.0 OFFICIAL BASKETBALL RULES INTERPRETATIONS Page 3 of 112 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction . .......................................................................................................................................................... 5 Article 4 Teams ............................................................................................................................................... 6 Article 5 Players: Injury and assistance .................................................................................................... 7 Article 7 Head coach and first assistant coach: Duties and Powers ................................................. 10 Article 8 Playing time, tied score and overtime ...................................................................................... 12 Article 9 Beginning and end of a quarter, overtime or the game ........................................................ 14 Article 10 Status of the ball .........................................................................................................................
[Show full text]
Journal of Sport and Kinetic Movement Vol
Journal of Sport and Kinetic Movement Vol. I, No. 31/2018 EFFICIENCY OF BASKETBALL POINT GUARD PLAYER IN GAMES Florentina POPESCU1, Maria-Cristiana PORFIREANU2, Cristian RISTEA1 1Faculty of Physical Education and Sport Spiru Haret 2Academy of Economic Studies [email protected] Abstract: Introduction Modern sports games training methodology has some important changes in the conception of content, structure and organization of the players’ training. Each sport game has a modeling method applicable, as well as in basketball training. In a basketball team, each player has a specific position on court, but the players are request to play more positions (roles) in a game. So, that means the players have to be able to change fast their role in order to win points. Material and methods Goal’s paper is to analyze the efficiency of the actions of the leading basketball player in 2017 National Championship in Romania. The hypothesis: if the individualized basketball training the coach’ aims are increasing the effectiveness of the attack actions, then on the official games, the leader will have high percentages in the playing model. The research methods used are: scientific documentation, case study, statistical-mathematical method, graphic method. The study was based on the record sheets of 35 official games from Women's Basketball National Championship in a competitive year, 2017. Results: We analyzed the point guard’ efficiency in the basketball team performance. We recorded the game model indicators for the female Romanian basketball team. Discussions and conclusions One of the most important role of the players is to be point guard. For this, the player has to be very good in handling the ball, for passing, dribbling, throwing, shooting.
[Show full text]
Official Basketball Statistics Rules Basic Interpretations
Official Basketball Statistics Rules With Approved Rulings and Interpretations (Throughout this manual, Team A players have last names starting with “A” the shooter tries to control and shoot the ball in the and Team B players have last names starting with “B.”) same motion with not enough time to get into a nor- mal shooting position (squared up to the basket). Article 2. A field goal made (FGM) is credited to a play- Basic Interpretations er any time a FGA by the player results in the goal being (Indicated as “B.I.” references throughout manual.) counted or results in an awarded score of two (or three) points except when the field goal is the result of a defen- sive player tipping the ball in the offensive basket. 1. APPROVED RULING—Approved rulings (indicated as A.R.s) are designed to interpret the spirit of the applica- Related rules in the NCAA Men’s and Women’s Basketball tion of the Official Basketball Rules. A thorough under- Rules and Interpretations: standing of the rules is essential to understanding and (1) 4-33: Definition of “Goal” applying the statistics rules in this manual. (2) 4-49.2: Definition of “Penalty for Violation” (3) 4-69: Definition of “Try for Field Goal” and definition of 2. STATISTICIAN’S JOB—The statistician’s responsibility is “Act of Shooting” to judge only what has happened, not to speculate as (4) 4-73: Definition of “Violation” to what would have happened. The statistician should (5) 5-1: “Scoring” not decide who would have gotten the rebound if it had (6) 9-16: “Basket Interference and Goaltending” not been for the foul.
[Show full text]
Ranking the Greatest NBA Players: an Analytics Analysis
1 Ranking the Greatest NBA Players: An Analytics Analysis An Honors Thesis by Jeremy Mertz Thesis Advisor Dr. Lawrence Judge Ball State University Muncie, Indiana July 2015 Expected Date of Graduation May 2015 1-' ,II L II/du, t,- i II/em' /.. 2 ?t; q ·7t./ 2 (11 S Ranking the Greatest NBA Players: An Analytics Analysis . Iv/If 7 Abstract The purpose of this investigation was to present a statistical model to help rank top National Basketball Association (NBA) players of all time. As the sport of basketball evolves, the debate on who is the greatest player of all-time in the NBA never seems to reach consensus. This ongoing debate can sometimes become emotional and personal, leading to arguments and in extreme cases resulting in violence and subsequent arrest. Creating a statistical model to rank players may also help coaches determine important variables for player development and aid in future approaches to the game via key data-driven performance indicators. However, computing this type of model is extremely difficult due to the many individual player statistics and achievements to consider, as well as the impact of changes to the game over time on individual player performance analysis. This study used linear regression to create an accurate model for the top 150 player rankings. The variables computed included: points per game, rebounds per game, assists per game, win shares per 48 minutes, and number ofNBA championships won. The results revealed that points per game, rebounds per game, assists per game, and NBA championships were all necessary for an accurate model and win shares per 48 minutes were not significant.
[Show full text]
Partisan Gerrymandering and the Efficiency Gap Nicholas 0
+(,121/,1( Citation: 82 U. Chi. L. Rev. 831 2015 Provided by: The University of Chicago D'Angelo Law Library Content downloaded/printed from HeinOnline (http://heinonline.org) Tue Feb 2 13:11:38 2016 -- Your use of this HeinOnline PDF indicates your acceptance of HeinOnline's Terms and Conditions of the license agreement available at http://heinonline.org/HOL/License -- The search text of this PDF is generated from uncorrected OCR text. -- To obtain permission to use this article beyond the scope of your HeinOnline license, please use: https://www.copyright.com/ccc/basicSearch.do? &operation=go&searchType=0 &lastSearch=simple&all=on&titleOrStdNo=0041-9494 Partisan Gerrymandering and the Efficiency Gap Nicholas 0. Stephanopoulost& Eric M McGheeft The usual legal story about partisangerrymandering is relentlesslypessimis- tic. The courts did not even recognize the cause of action until the 1980s; they have never struck down a district plan on this basis; and four sitting justices want to vacate the field altogether. The Supreme Court's most recent gerrymanderingdeci- sion, however, is the most encouraging development in this area in a generation. Several justices expressed interest in the concept of partisan symmetry-the idea that a plan should treat the majorparties symmetrically in terms of the conversion of votes to seats--and suggested that it could be shaped into a legal test. In this Article, we take the justices at their word. First, we introduce a new measure of partisan symmetry: the efficiency gap. It represents the difference be- tween the parties' respective wasted votes in an election, divided by the total num- ber of votes cast.
[Show full text]
YMCA Recreational Basketball Rules
YMCA Recreational Basketball Rules All players must play at least half a game or receive equal playing time. Allowances may be made if practices are missed or for behavioral problems. Team rules should be in place by coaches and team members. Grades 2-4 Both Head Coaches will meet at mid-court socially distance prior to game with official(s) to discuss game procedure, special rules and odd/even number behind back for possession of ball (no center jump). Grades 5-8 Both Head Coaches will meet at mid-court socially distance prior to game to meet with official(s) to discuss game procedures. Tip off at center court to begin game. PLAYING RULES In general, the league will be governed by the Nebraska High School Basketball rules. 1. Bench Area Only the Head Coach can stand during game play (if bench/chairs present). Maximum of 2 coaches on bench. NO PARENTS IN BENCH AREA. 2. Time Limits Two 20 minute Halves. 3 minute break between halves. Grade 2 & 3: Score is not kept; clock will only stop on time-outs/injuries. Grades 4-8: Clock will only stop on time-outs/injuries and on all whistles in the final minute of the game, only if game is within 5 points. 3. Game Time Game may be started and played with 4 players (5th player, upon arrival, can sub in at dead ball). 4. Time-outs Each team is allowed one(1) full time-out and one(1) 30 second time-out per half. Time-outs DO NOT carry over to second half.
[Show full text]