sign in sign up
<<
Home , Bin Qasim Town, Jamshed Town, Keamari Town, Malir Town, New Karachi Town, Orangi Town

This project is initiated by US State Department through University Partnership programme Between George Mason University and University of

KARACHI MEGA CITY SURVEY 2015 – 2016

Department of Public Administration

Team of Karachi Mega City Survey

Project Members Questionnaire Designing Translation of Questionnaire Training of Enumerators Sample Design Field Operation Data Processing Data Management Typing and Graphic Designing Compilation of Report

FOREWORD

KARACHI MEGA CITY SURVEY 2015 – 2016 CONTENTS

FOREWORD...... 3 Main Indicators ...... 8 Summary of Findings ...... 8 Section – I Methodology ...... 8 Section – II Concepts and Definitions ...... 11 Section – III Salient Features ...... 11 Marital Status ...... 11 Sex Ratio ...... 11 Literacy ...... 12 Level of Education ...... 12 Migration ...... 13 Reason of Migration ...... 13 Migrant Employment Status ...... 13 Form II - WATER AND SANITATION ...... 14 District wise status of Housing ...... 14 Source of Water Supply in Area ...... 14 Quality of Water ...... 14 How much you Pay if Purchase Water ...... 15 Pay for Purchase of Drinking Water...... 15 Ever Register Complain of Water Supply ...... 15 Have your Complain Were Resolved ...... 16 Type of Toilet ...... 17 Access to Electricity ...... 18 Access to Landline Phone ...... 18 Availability/Owner of Smart Mobile Phone ...... 18 Access to Internet ...... 18 Mother Tongue of Family ...... 18 Type of Combustion use for Cooking ...... 18 Other Source of Income ...... 18 Access to Garbage Dumping Near House ...... 18 Level of Satisfaction with KMC Garbage Management ...... 18 Form II - Cross Tabs ...... 18 Type of Construction and Status of Owner ship ...... 18 Type of Ownership Other Source of Income ...... 18 Size of House and Type of Ownership ...... 18 Status of Ownership and Mother Tongue ...... 18 Source of Water Supply and Purchase of Drinking Water ...... 18 FORM III – TRANSPORT ...... 18 Safest Mode of Transport ...... 18 Chin-Chi Should returns on Road ...... 21 Attributes of the Facilities Available in Bus ...... 21 I. Cleanliness ...... 21 II. Trustful ...... 21 III. Safety ...... 21 IV. Excess ...... 21 V. Security ...... 21 VI. Comfortable ...... 21 VII. Space Available for Male ...... 21 VIII. Space Available for Female ...... 21 Reason for not Using Bus as a Mode of Transport ...... 21 I. Trustful ...... 21 II. Safety ...... 21 III. Excess ...... 21 IV. Security ...... 21 V. Comfortable ...... 21 VI. Large Amount of Passengers ...... 21 VII. Space Available for Female ...... 21 Problems Faced Due to Traveling in Bus ...... 21 I. Mental Pressure ...... 21 II. Effect on Working Efficiency ...... 21 III. Physical Pressure...... 21 IV. Reach Late on Work ...... 21 V. Women Face Sexual Harassment ...... 21 VI. Fear of Cylinder Explosion ...... 21 VII. Presence of Pocket Picker ...... 21 Driver Don’t Follow the Traffic Rule ...... 21 City Government Is Efficient in Emergency Condition ...... 21 Average Spending on Travel...... 21 Reason of Traveling in Chin-Chi ...... 21 Revival of Circular Railway ...... 21 FORM IV – EDUCATION ...... 22 Preferences of Schooling System ...... 22 Satisfaction with Fee Structure ...... 22 Satisfaction of Standard of Education ...... 22 Current Education Enrolment ...... 22 Reason of Preference ...... 22 I. Standard of Education ...... 22 II. Cost/Fees ...... 22 III. Standard of Admission ...... 22 IV. Standard of Evaluation ...... 22 V. Easy Access ...... 22 VI. Religious Education ...... 22 VII. Financial Status ...... 22 Comparison of Different Educational Board ...... 22 I. Karachi Board ...... 22 II. Agha Khan Board ...... 22 III. Cambridge Board ...... 22 IV. Wifaq-ul- Madaris ...... 22 Rate the Facilities Available in School ...... 22 I. Overall Educational Standard ...... 23 II. Class Room ...... 23 III. Class Furniture ...... 23 IV. Library ...... 23 V. Book Available in Library ...... 23 VI. Drinking Water ...... 23 VII. Canteen ...... 23 VIII. Cleanliness in Cafeteria ...... 23 IX. Crockery in Cafeteria ...... 23 X. First Aid Facility of School ...... 23 XI. Cleanliness of Washroom ...... 23 XII. Security ...... 23 Rate School/College Facilities ...... 23 I. Proper Class Room ...... 23 II. Seat Assignment ...... 23 III. Fan...... 23 IV. Black/White Board ...... 23 V. Rule for Punctuality ...... 23 VI. Class Start on Time ...... 23 VII. Student Have Proper Books ...... 23 VIII. Dustbin in Class Room ...... 23 Rate Activities of School or College ...... 23 I. Following Schedule ...... 23 II. Understanding f Subject Taught ...... 23 III. Raising Question In Class ...... 23 IV. Knowledge Sharing ...... 23 V. Appreciation of Question Raising ...... 23 VI. Appropriate Response on Question ...... 23 Extra-Curricular Activities in School / College ...... 24 I. Speech Competition ...... 24 II. Spelling Bee Competition ...... 24 III. Kangaroo Competition ...... 24 IV. Indoor Games ...... 24 V. Outdoor Games ...... 24 VI. Stage Competition ...... 24 VII. Music/Singing Competition ...... 24 VIII. Annual Sports Day ...... 24 IX. Carnival ...... 24

Main Indicators

Summary of Findings

Section – I Methodology

Sampling and Survey The city of Karachi was classified into strata according to its 18 administrative towns and 6 areas. Each town and cantonment was divided into blocks and each block comprises of 200 to 250 households, on average; every town and cantonment has different blocks sizes based on their population as recorded in the 1998 census. According to the Bureau of Statistic (PBS), Karachi has 13233 blocks.

A 1% sample of blocks was taken from each stratum through systematic random sampling.

Classifying the blocks into strata, and sampling of block from each stratum is separately illustrated below using an1 example from Kaemari Town.

The Sample Procedure for the KMCS: An example from the Town

ESTIMATED No. of S. ENUMERATION NAME OF BLOCK CUMULATIVE Systematic Rank DISTRICT HOUSE No. BLOCK TOWN CODE No, of H.H. R.No. Sample HOLDS - 2014 1 9 West KAEMARI 1St Sample TOWN ***** 93 1363 1297 2 129 West KAEMARI 2nd Sample TOWN ****** 130 23433 23355 3 242 West KAEMARI 3rd Sample TOWN ******* 183 45564 45412

KAEMARI TOWN

1. 1 % sample blocks taken from the total of 346 Blocks in Kaemari Town= 03

2. Selected 3 Primary Sampling Units (PSUs) blocks (clusters) from 346 in the sampling frame (#s 9,129, 242).

1 Please see a complete list of distribution attached of each town in the appendix.

3. Calculated estimated number of households in all clusters =66173

4. Class Intervals= 66173/3 = 22057.57

5. Random Start (RS) is set to a number between 0.1 and 22057.57

6. RS is selected from a random number table; in this illustration, 1297

At the second stage of sampling, 15 households were selected through systematic random sampling (SRS). A total sample of 1980 (13233x 1% =132 x 15) households was designed for the Karachi Megacity Survey (KMCS). The sampling frame was set in such a way that the first sample was chosen at random using a random number table, and the remaining households were selected based on a regular interval calculated to meet the target sample. For example, if there were a total of 225 houses in a block, the calculation would be 210/15 = 14; so every 14th house was chosen based on a random starting point within the range of 1 to 14. If the random starting point was 6, then houses 6, 20, 34, 48, 52, 66, 80, 94, 108, 122, 136, 150, 164, 178, and 192 were selected. During the survey, it was found that some blocks have varying numbers of households. Some have fewer than 200 households and some have more than 300 households. In each blocks, a sample of 15 households was selected with SRS and a random starting point for interviews.

Using this process, a total of 1980 households were visited for interviews. 11,127 individuals were interviewed from these 1980 households. 11 additional households were selected to make the survey representative of all towns and cantonments. During the course of the fieldwork some households were not willing to participate. In such a case, the next household along the route was selected for participation. Some households were visited more than once due to unavailability of one or more members of the household and for the confirmation of migration issues. The response rate was declined due to unavailability of respondents2.

Three type of factors led to variability in the number of households visited for an interview in a block: first, was variation in the number of households located in a block, second some

2 Please see table of response rate in the appendix. members were not available at selected households and third people were not interested in the survey due to privacy or security concerns or for other reasons.

District and Town/Cantonment wise distribution of Karachi

No. of Town / No. of Blocks Name of Name of Town Households Cantonment in Town District /Cantonment in Town Code/ID /Cantonment /Cantonment

1 2 2 4 5 406 Kaemari Town 346 66173

407 Site Town 329 93753 West 408 667 117395

409 Town 957 355477

410 Town 567 87436 South 411 Town 832 182091

412 1153 238403 East 413 Gulshan-e-Iqbal Town 1155 231632

414 387 77255

Korangi 415 Town 787 172342

416 Town 1043 196229 North Nizamabad 417 582 101094 Town 418 1076 222714 Central 419 Gulberg Town 686 121340

420 Liaqatabad Town 956 189392

421 609 120550

Malir 422 115 24275

423 Town 191 32585

Cantonments 424 Faisal Cantt. 345 61037 426 Karachi Cantt. 79 7767

427 Clifton Cantt. 244 25946

428 Malir Cantt, 83 9839

429 Korangi Creek Cantt. 43 6452

430 Manora Cantt. 1 275

Total 13233 2741452

Response rate of Survey

Form No. Themes of Survey Number of Not Total Response Respondent Available number of Rate Interviewed respondents eligible for interview Form I Household (HH/any 18+) 1991 0 1991 100.00% Water and Sanitation (HH/any Form II 18+) 1991 0 1991 100.00% Form III Transport (Age 15+) 5898 1885 7783 75.80% Form IV Education (Head of Household) 1184 108 1292 91.64% Form IV Education (10 to 16 Years) 990 804 1794 55.18% Form IV Education (Higher Education) 1289 317 1606 80.26% Form V Health (HH/Patient) 1991 0 1991 100.00% Form VI Youth (Age 15-29 years) 2689 665 3354 80.20%

Section – II Concepts and Definitions

Section – III Salient Features Marital Status District of Residence Marital Status Central East West South Malir Korangi Cantonments Total

Single (never married) 37.4% 40.4% 33.1% 33.2% 40.7% 42.1% 27.2% 37.6%

Married 56.3% 54.5% 65.4% 61.9% 53.6% 52.9% 71.3% 57.7%

Widowed 5.8% 4.9% 1.2% 4.5% 5.2% 4.8% 1.6% 4.4%

Divorced 0.4% 0.1% 0.1% 0.3% 0.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.2%

Separated 0.2% 0.1% 0.2% 0.1% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.1% Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Sex Ratio Sex ratio District of Residence Central East West South Malir Korangi Cantonments Total

Male 52.4% 54.2% 55.5% 55.0% 53.1% 52.9% 58.6% 54.0%

Female 47.6% 45.8% 44.5% 45.0% 46.9% 47.1% 41.4% 46.0% Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Literacy District of Residence Literacy Central East West South Malir Korangi Cantonments Total Never Attended 14.2% 10.1% 28.7% 17.0% 27.9% 19.8% 5.2% 17.4%

Attended 85.8% 89.9% 71.3% 83.0% 72.1% 80.2% 94.8% 82.6%

Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Level of Education District of Residence Level of Education Central East West South Malir Korangi Cantonments Total Below Primary 19.6% 13.4% 33.1% 21.6% 20.8% 29.6% 19.7% 22.0%

Middle 17.0% 17.4% 27.5% 22.6% 19.9% 17.4% 20.9% 19.6%

Matric 21.7% 21.7% 27.2% 22.1% 20.1% 25.1% 22.2% 23.0%

FA/FSc 13.9% 14.5% 5.5% 15.1% 14.9% 12.0% 13.4% 12.8%

Diploma 0.7% 2.0% 0.3% 1.7% 0.6% 1.0% 0.2% 1.0%

BA/BSc/B. Com 14.9% 19.2% 2.1% 8.1% 16.2% 7.3% 11.2% 12.0%

BBA/MBBS/BDS 1.7% 2.9% 0.1% 1.0% 0.6% 0.3% 1.8% 1.4%

MA/MSc/BE 5.8% 5.4% 0.4% 1.2% 3.5% 2.1% 3.7% 3.6%

MS/MBA 1.7% 1.3% 0.2% 0.2% 0.7% 0.5% 2.2% 1.0%

MPhil 0.1% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.2% 0.2% 0.2% 0.1%

CA or Equivalent 0.4% 0.5% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.1% 0.4% 0.3% Qualificatioin PhD/FRCS/MRCP OR 0.2% 0.3% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.2% Equalient Madarasa 2.2% 1.4% 3.3% 6.4% 2.4% 4.4% 4.1% 3.2%

Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Migration Reason of Migration

Job Transfer Frequency Percent

To seek Employment 80 5.7

Marriage 214 15.2

Business 53 3.8

Moved with the Family 52 3.7

Total 1405 100.0%

District of Residence Reason for Migration Central East West South Malir Korangi Cantonments Total

Job Transfer 3.5% 4.6% 2.0% 11.6% 3.8% 1.8% 9.0% 5.7%

To seek Employment 12.2% 23.1% 21.6% 10.5% 10.3% 16.7% 11.2% 15.2%

Marriage 31.3% 0.9% 1.0% 0.0% 6.0% 0.9% 0.0% 3.8%

Business 2.6% 0.9% 3.9% 3.0% 7.1% 1.8% 12.4% 3.7%

Moved with the Family 50.4% 70.4% 71.6% 74.9% 72.8% 78.9% 67.4% 71.6%

Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Migrant Employment Status

Migrant Employment Status Frequency Percent Full-time Employed 254 18.1 Part-time Employed 28 2.0 House Work/ Housewife 343 24.4 Unemployed but Looking for work 19 1.4 Unemployed but not looking for work 11 .8 Don't work 71 5.1 Student 101 7.2 Self-employed 49 3.5 Total 876 62.3 Not Eligible (Less than 15 years) 529 37.7 Total 1405 100.0%

Form II - WATER AND SANITATION District wise status of Housing District of Residence House type/size Central East West South Malir Korangi Cantonments Total

Hut 0.0% 6.2% 0.0% 0.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 1.2%

Small house (<80 sq. yards) 32.9% 15.6% 73.6% 42.8% 16.3% 66.3% 29.1% 41.3%

Town house (80-240 sq. yards) 43.2% 34.3% 23.0% 34.7% 78.9% 33.7% 30.7% 37.8%

Bungalow (300-500 sq. yards) 3.4% 9.2% 0.3% 1.6% 0.0% 0.0% 16.6% 3.7%

Bungalow (500+ sq. yards) 6.4% 10.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 1.8% 3.6%

Ordinary Flat (2 rooms or less) 9.7% 19.0% 2.9% 13.8% 0.0% 0.0% 11.1% 8.6%

Large Flat (3+ rooms) 4.4% 5.4% 0.2% 6.7% 4.8% 0.0% 10.7% 3.8% Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Source of Water Supply in Area District of Residence Source of Water Supply in Area Central East West South Malir Korangi Cantonments Total

Karachi Water Sanitation Board 94.2% 90.2% 64.6% 84.7% 98.2% 75.4% 28.8% 81.6% (KWSB)

DHA/ Cantonment Board 1.0% 0.6% 0.3% 1.4% 1.0% 0.0% 69.1% 4.1%

Private tanker 0.3% 0.3% 35.1% 4.0% 0.0% 5.3% 2.1% 6.9%

Other(specify) 4.5% 9.0% 0.0% 9.9% 0.9% 19.3% 0.0% 7.4%

Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Quality of Water District of Residence Water supplied to your house fit for drinking Central East West South Malir Korangi Cantonments Total

Yes 54.8% 32.9% 22.9% 66.9% 35.7% 60.6% 44.5% 46.2%

No 35.9% 62.7% 70.4% 31.7% 28.5% 36.3% 51.8% 46.1%

Don't Know 9.3% 4.4% 6.8% 1.4% 35.8% 3.1% 3.8% 7.6% Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% How much you Pay if Purchase Water District of Residence Pay if Purchase Water Central East West South Malir Korangi Cantonments Total

None (free of Cost) 7.1% 2.5% 34.4% 7.0% 27.9% 0.0% 10.8%

Less than Rs.1000/- 4.5% 28.1% 26.9% 33.1% 32.6% 14.7% 0.4% 20.8%

Rs.1000 - 2000 19.8% 29.5% 34.1% 11.9% 0.0% 31.2% 9.4% 26.1%

Rs. 2000 - 5000 23.5% 15.8% 24.6% 0.8% 14.0% 19.6% 36.7% 20.8%

Rs.5000 or More 42.6% 23.4% 11.6% 16.9% 37.2% 6.7% 49.0% 20.0%

Don’t Know 2.4% 3.2% 0.3% 2.8% 9.3% 0.0% 4.5% 1.5%

Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Pay for Purchase of Drinking Water

District of Residence Pay for Purchase of Drinking Water Central East West South Malir Korangi Cantonments Total

Yes 32.3% 57.5% 10.6% 23.4% 47.7% 21.0% 53.2% 33.1%

No 65.9% 41.0% 88.9% 76.6% 52.3% 77.8% 45.4% 65.8%

Don't Know 1.7% 1.5% 0.5% 0.0% 0.0% 1.2% 1.4% 1.1%

Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Ever Register Complain of Water Supply District of Residence Pay for Purchase of Drinking Water Central East West South Malir Korangi Cantonments Total

Always 18.3% 40.1% 18.8% 6.5% 22.0% 29.6% 0.7% 22.6%

Often 12.9% 21.9% 24.2% 13.8% 17.5% 17.0% 13.2% 17.5%

Sometimes 12.4% 12.9% 20.1% 26.6% 22.8% 15.1% 26.3% 17.2%

Never 55.2% 22.8% 34.2% 51.2% 36.8% 33.0% 56.8% 40.1%

Don't Know 1.2% 2.3% 2.7% 1.9% 0.9% 5.4% 3.0% 2.5% Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Have your Complain Were Resolved District of Residence Were Complain Resolve Central East West South Malir Korangi Cantonments Total Timely Resolved 4.1% 12.8% 4.7% 20.7% 4.7% 10.0% 14.2% 9.5% Resolved after several 7.6% 14.5% 13.1% 30.8% 6.3% 9.9% 55.1% 14.4% days Never Resolved 80.8% 67.2% 74.8% 39.0% 87.6% 72.1% 26.7% 69.4%

Don’t Know 7.5% 5.5% 7.4% 9.5% 1.4% 8.1% 4.0% 6.7%

Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Electric Appliances, Car and Motor bike in house Percent House have a TV Yes 92.3% No 7.7% House have a washing machine Yes 87.9%

No 12.1% House have a computer, laptop or tablet No 52.1% Yes, one 36.1%

Yes, two 11.1% Yes, three or more .8% House have internet connection for computer Yes 60.0% No 40.0%

House have a refrigerator Yes 85.1% No 14.9% House have a motorcycle or scooter Yes 59.7% No 40.3%

House have a motorcar or van No 74.0% Yes, one 19.3%

Yes, two 6.2% Yes, three or more .5%

District of Residence Availability of Luxury Items Central East West South Malir Korangi Cantonment House have a TV Yes 97.1% 93.2% 81.0% 93.7% 99.5% 88.8% 97.9% No 2.9% 6.8% 19.0% 6.3% .5% 11.2% 2.1%

House have a washing Yes 87.6% 93.0% 79.6% 86.3% 96.1% 84.3% 99.1% machine No 12.4% 7.0% 20.4% 13.7% 3.9% 15.7% .9% House have a No 44.1% 32.2% 52.9% 63.8% 55.8% 79.3% 36.4% computer, laptop or tablet Yes, one 47.8% 55.2% 10.3% 30.8% 43.2% 18.9% 45.0% Yes, two 7.8% 10.3% 36.8% 5.1% 1.0% 1.8% 14.3% Yes, .3% 2.2% 0.0% .3% 0.0% 0.0% 4.3% three or more House have internet Yes 55.7% 89.8% 8.9% 79.4% 42.5% 53.2% 68.0% connection for computer No 44.3% 10.2% 91.1% 20.6% 57.5% 46.8% 32.0%

House have a Yes 93.6% 91.5% 74.1% 80.7% 91.3% 72.2% 99.1% refrigerator No 6.4% 8.5% 25.9% 19.3% 8.7% 27.8% .9% House have a Yes 73.7% 65.7% 35.3% 61.6% 71.3% 50.0% 56.1% motorcycle or scooter No 26.3% 34.3% 64.7% 38.4% 28.7% 50.0% 43.9%

House have a motorcar No 69.9% 59.5% 84.1% 77.6% 86.7% 88.2% 43.2% or van Yes, one 26.0% 32.1% 4.4% 16.5% 11.7% 6.7% 45.4% Yes, two 3.8% 7.2% 11.5% 5.9% 1.6% 5.1% 8.8% Yes, .3% 1.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 2.7% three or more

Type of Toilet District of Residence Type of Toilet Central East West South Malir Korangi Cantonments Total Use open 0.6% 0.5% 1.0% 0.8% 2.5% 0.6% 0.0% 0.8% Space Non-flush 1.0% 3.6% 4.8% 7.0% 5.5% 3.3% 0.0% 3.4% latrine

Flush latrine 98.1% 89.7% 91.0% 81.5% 89.3% 95.8% 100.0% 92.5%

Close pit 0.1% 6.3% 3.0% 10.7% 0.0% 0.4% 0.0% 3.0%

Public latrine 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Other 0.0% 0.0% 0.2% 0.0% 2.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.2%

Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Access to Electricity Access to Landline Phone Availability/Owner of Smart Mobile Phone Access to Internet

Mother Tongue of Family Type of Combustion use for Cooking Other Source of Income Access to Garbage Dumping Near House Level of Satisfaction with KMC Garbage Management

Form II - Cross Tabs Type of Construction and Status of Owner ship Type of Ownership Other Source of Income Size of House and Type of Ownership Status of Ownership and Mother Tongue Source of Water Supply and Purchase of Drinking Water

FORM III – TRANSPORT Safest Mode of Transport

Safe Mode of transport Responses Percent

Yes 22.9% Bicycle No 48.4% Don't Know 28.7% Yes 52.2% Public Bus No 23.7% Don't Know 24.1% Yes 77.6% Private car No 12.0% Don't Know 10.4% Yes 56.0% Carpool with others No 17.0% Don't Know 27.0% Yes 58.6% Pick up/drop service No 15.0% Don't Know 26.4% Yes 29.9% Motor cycle No 43.2% Don't Know 27.0% Yes 56.3% Taxi No 18.4% Don't Know 25.2% Yes 53.2% Auto Rickshaw No 21.5% Don't Know 25.3% Yes 47.6% Walking No 28.5% Don't Know 23.9%

Safe District of Residence Mode of Responses transport Central East West South Malir Korangi Cantonment Yes 34.9% 4.9% 7.6% 16.7% 44.2% 37.7% 23.7%

Bicycle No 46.6% 21.2% 81.2% 74.6% 37.6% 45.7% 71.1% Don't 18.5% 74.0% 11.2% 8.7% 18.2% 16.6% 5.2% Know Yes 66.6% 12.3% 42.8% 72.2% 82.8% 70.4% 61.1% Public No 23.4% 13.5% 48.2% 19.8% 13.9% 17.4% 33.0% Bus Don't 10.0% 74.2% 9.1% 8.0% 3.2% 12.3% 5.9% Know Yes 88.1% 75.5% 50.2% 73.9% 90.3% 78.1% 90.7% Private No 8.2% 7.7% 37.8% 12.2% 5.6% 5.3% .4% car Don't 3.7% 16.8% 12.1% 13.8% 4.1% 16.6% 8.9% Know Yes 75.1% 16.3% 49.5% 71.9% 86.9% 51.2% 80.4% Carpool with No 13.4% 13.6% 38.1% 18.3% 4.7% 14.7% 12.6% others Don't 11.4% 70.1% 12.4% 9.8% 8.4% 34.1% 7.0% Know Yes 77.4% 13.3% 47.8% 78.8% 90.6% 67.2% 87.4% Pick up/drop No 12.0% 11.7% 39.2% 12.9% 4.1% 8.6% 7.8% service Don't 10.6% 74.9% 13.0% 8.2% 5.4% 24.2% 4.8% Know Yes 40.0% 10.2% 17.8% 58.8% 31.5% 26.0% 58.9% Motor No 45.3% 16.0% 72.4% 33.9% 54.1% 57.6% 34.1% cycle Don't 14.8% 73.8% 9.8% 7.3% 14.4% 16.4% 7.0% Know Yes 70.9% 10.9% 52.3% 68.6% 83.3% 76.0% 90.7%

Taxi No 19.0% 13.5% 36.4% 23.4% 10.7% 9.8% 4.8% Don't 10.1% 75.6% 11.3% 8.0% 6.0% 14.2% 4.4% Know Yes 62.9% 14.2% 54.2% 72.2% 77.9% 61.4% 88.5% Auto No 25.3% 11.7% 35.6% 20.0% 17.6% 23.5% 4.4% Rikshaw Don't 11.8% 74.1% 10.2% 7.8% 4.5% 15.1% 7.0% Know Yes 76.2% 8.8% 25.3% 33.9% 85.2% 72.4% 25.6%

Walking No 14.6% 16.3% 66.9% 57.2% 11.6% 14.9% 69.6% Don't 9.2% 74.9% 7.8% 8.9% 3.2% 12.7% 4.8% Know

Chin-Chi Should returns on Road Attributes of the Facilities Available in Bus I. Cleanliness II. Trustful III. Safety IV. Excess V. Security VI. Comfortable VII. Space Available for Male VIII. Space Available for Female Reason for not Using Bus as a Mode of Transport I. Trustful II. Safety III. Excess IV. Security V. Comfortable VI. Large Number of Passengers VII. Space Available for Female

Problems Faced Due to Traveling in Bus

I. Mental Pressure II. Effect on Working Efficiency III. Physical Pressure IV. Reach Late on Work V. Women Face Sexual Harassment VI. Fear of Cylinder Explosion VII. Presence of Pocket Picker

Driver Don’t Follow the Traffic Rule City Government Is Efficient in Emergency Condition Average Spending on Travel Reason of Traveling in Chin-Chi Revival of Circular Railway

FORM IV – EDUCATION Preferences of Schooling System Satisfaction with Fee Structure Satisfaction of Standard of Education Current Education Enrolment

Reason of Preference I. Standard of Education II. Cost/Fees III. Standard of Admission IV. Standard of Evaluation V. Easy Access VI. Religious Education VII. Financial Status

Comparison of Different Educational Board I. Karachi Board II. Agha Khan Board III. Cambridge Board IV. Wifaq-ul- Madaris

Rate the Facilities Available in School

I. Overall Educational Standard II. Class Room III. Class Furniture IV. Library V. Book Available in Library VI. Drinking Water VII. Canteen VIII. Cleanliness in Cafeteria IX. Crockery in Cafeteria X. First Aid Facility of School XI. Cleanliness of Washroom XII. Security

Rate School/College Facilities I. Proper Class Room II. Seat Assignment III. Fan IV. Black/White Board V. Rule for Punctuality VI. Class Start on Time VII. Student Have Proper Books VIII. Dustbin in Class Room

Rate Activities of School or College I. Following Schedule II. Understanding f Subject Taught III. Raising Question In Class IV. Knowledge Sharing V. Appreciation of Question Raising VI. Appropriate Response on Question

Extra-Curricular Activities in School / College I. Speech Competition II. Spelling Bee Competition III. Kangaroo Competition IV. Indoor Games V. Outdoor Games VI. Stage Competition VII. Music/Singing Competition VIII. Annual Sports Day IX. Carnival