DOCSLIB.ORG

General Agreement on 3 ^ ^ 1 9

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
General Agreement on 3 ^ ^ 1 9 RESTRICTED GENERAL AGREEMENT ON 3^^1978 TARIFFS AND TRADE Limited Distribution REGIONAL AGREEMENTS Calendar of Biennial Reports for Examination At their twenty-seventh session the CONTRACTING PARTIES instructed the Council to establish a calendar fixing dates for the examination, every two years, of the reports on regional agreements (SR.27/12, page 167). The Council agreed on a time-table by which the contracting parties members of a regional agreement would be invited to submit biennial reports on develop­ ments under the agreements concerned. The time-table covered the period of April 1977-October 1978 (L/kkk5). In order to assist the Council in establishing a new time-table for the next two years there is herewith attached a table showing various regional and association agreements, the dates on which the last biennial reports were submitted or, if applicable, the dates of the reports of the relevant working parties. In certain cases the Council already determined the dates for the biennial reports. On the basis of these data a tentative calendar has been suggested for the submission of reports. When establishing a new time-table the Council will be aware that some of the agreements listed may be renegotiated in the ensuing period. The time-table may, therefore, bo revised as appropriate. C/W/3U Page 2 Report Working Party Council Proposed date Regional Agreement submitted report discussion for reporting Arab Common Market January 1977 March 1977 April 1979 (L/UU62) Australia-Papua New October 1977 November October 1979 Guinea Agreement (L/U571) 1977 (C/M/123) Central American Due October October 1980 Common Market 1978 Caribbean Community February 1977 March 1977 April 1979 and Common Market (L/UU70) (C/M/119) ACP-EEC Convention Due October October 1980 of Lome 1978 EEC-Algeria October 1977 November October 1979 UA559) 1977 (C/M/123) EEC-Cyprus July 1978 July 1978 April 1980 (L/U685) EEC-Egypt May 1978 May 1978 April 1980 (LA660) (C/M/125) EEC-Greece Due October October 1980 1978 EEC-Israel Due April April 1980 1978 EEC-Jordan May 1978 May 1978 April 1980 (L/U662) (C/M/125) EEC-Lebanon May 1978 May 1978 April 1980 (L/U663) (C/M/125) EEC-Malta July 1978 July 1978 April 1980 (L/U686) EEC-Morocco October 1977 November October 1979 (L/U560) 1977 (C/M/123) EEC-Spain August 1978 October April 1980 (LA695) 1978 C/W/311 Page 3 Report Working Party Council Proposed date Regional Agreement submitted report discussion for reporting EEC-Syria May 1978 May 1978 April 1980 (LA661) (C/M/125) EEC-Tunisia October 1977 November October 1979 (LA558) 1977 (C/M/123) EEC-Turkey Due October - October 1980 1978 EEC-Austria November November October 1979 1977 1977 (LA 573) EEC-Finland November November October 1979 1977 1977 (LA57M EEC-Iceland November November October 1979 1977 1977 (LA575) EEC-Norway November November October 1979 1977 1977 (LA576) EEC-Portugal November November October 1979 1977 1977 (LA577) EEC-Sweden November November October 1979 1977 1977 « (LA578) EEC-Switzerland and November November October 1979 Liechtenstein 1977 1977 (LA579) EFTA/FTHEFTA October 1977 November October 1979 (LA566) 1977 Finland-Czechoslovakia May 1978 May 1978 April 1980 (LA66U) Finland-Hungary October 1977 November October 1979 (LA56U) 1977 C/W/311 Page U Report Working Party Council Proposed date Regional Agreement submitted report discussion for reporting LAFTA Due October October 1980 1978 New Zealand-Australia November November October 1979 Free Trade Area 1977 1977 (LA589) The following agreements should be added to the Calendar when their examination by the working party concerned and the Council has been concluded: ASEAN Finland-Bulgaria Finland-German Democratic Republic Finland-Poland Time-table for reporting dates If the Council approves the dates suggested for reporting, the time-table would be as follows: April 1979 Arab Common Market Caribbean Community and Common Market October 1979 Agreement Australia-Papua New Guinea Agreements EEC-Algeria, Morocco, Tunisia Agreements EEC-Austria, Finland, Iceland, Norway, Portugal, Sweden, Switzerland and Liechtenstein EFTA/FINEFTA Agreement Finland-Hungary New Zealand-Australia Free Trade Area C/W/311 Page 5 April 1980 - Agreement EEC-Cyprus - Agreements EEC-Egypt, Jordan, Lebanon, Syria - Agreement EEC-Israel - Agreement EEC-Malta - Agreement EEC-Spain - Agreement Finland-Czechoslovakia October 1980 - Central American Common Market - ACP-EEC Convention of Lomé - Agreement EEC-Greece - Agreement EEC-Turkey - LAFTA .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • THE CENTRAL AFRICAN REPUBLIC and Small Arms Survey by Eric G
    SMALL ARMS: A REGIONAL TINDERBOX A REGIONAL ARMS: SMALL AND REPUBLIC AFRICAN THE CENTRAL Small Arms Survey By Eric G. Berman with Louisa N. Lombard Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies 47 Avenue Blanc, 1202 Geneva, Switzerland p +41 22 908 5777 f +41 22 732 2738 e [email protected] w www.smallarmssurvey.org THE CENTRAL AFRICAN REPUBLIC AND SMALL ARMS A REGIONAL TINDERBOX ‘ The Central African Republic and Small Arms is the most thorough and carefully researched G. Eric By Berman with Louisa N. Lombard report on the volume, origins, and distribution of small arms in any African state. But it goes beyond the focus on small arms. It also provides a much-needed backdrop to the complicated political convulsions that have transformed CAR into a regional tinderbox. There is no better source for anyone interested in putting the ongoing crisis in its proper context.’ —Dr René Lemarchand Emeritus Professor, University of Florida and author of The Dynamics of Violence in Central Africa ’The Central African Republic, surrounded by warring parties in Sudan, Chad, and the Democratic Republic of the Congo, lies on the fault line between the international community’s commitment to disarmament and the tendency for African conflicts to draw in their neighbours. The Central African Republic and Small Arms unlocks the secrets of the breakdown of state capacity in a little-known but pivotal state in the heart of Africa. It also offers important new insight to options for policy-makers and concerned organizations to promote peace in complex situations.’ —Professor William Reno Associate Professor and Director of Graduate Studies, Department of Political Science, Northwestern University Photo: A mutineer during the military unrest of May 1996.
    [Show full text]
  • 3/1980 Report
    MARCH 1980 SURVEY March 28, 1980 Surveyso fConsume rAttitude s Richard T.Curtin , Director §> CONSUMER SENTIMENT FALLS TO NEW RECORD LOW LEVEL **In the March 1980 survey, the Index of Consumer Sentiment was 56.5,dow n more than 10 Index-points from February 1980 (66.9) and March 1979 (68.4), and represents the lowest level recorded in more than a quarter-century. At no time have consumers been more pessimistic about their ownpersona l financial situation or about prospects for the economy as a whole. Importantly, the major portion of these declines were recorded prior to President Carter's latest inflation message just 10 percent of the interviews were conducted after Carter's speech. **Among families with incomes of $15,000 and over, the Index of Consumer Senti­ ment was 51.3 in March 1980,dow n from 60.2 in February 1980, and 65.2i n March 1979. TheMarc h 1980 Index figure of 51.3 is below the prior record low of 53.6 recorded in February 1975. **New record low levels recorded in March 1980include : *Near1y half (48 percent) of all families reported in March 1980 that they were worse off financially than a year earlier, twice the propor­ tion whoreporte d an improved financial situation (24 percent). *Three-in-four respondents (76 percent) expected bad times financially for the economy as a whole during the next 12 months, while just 14 percent expected improvement. ^Interest rates were expected to increase during the next 12 months by 71 percent of all families in March 1980an d the highest rates of expected inflation were recorded during early 1980, with consumers expecting inflation to average 12% during the next 12 months.
    [Show full text]
  • What Have We Learned Since October 1979?
    Panel Discussion I Moderation.” Recessions have become less fre- What Have We Learned Since quent and milder, and quarter-to-quarter volatility October 1979? in output and employment has declined signifi- cantly as well. The sources of the Great Moderation Ben S. Bernanke remain somewhat controversial, but, as I have argued elsewhere, there is evidence for the view he question asked of this panel is, that improved control of inflation has contributed “What have we learned since October in important measure to this welcome change in 1979?” The evidence suggests that we the economy (Bernanke, 2004). Paul Volcker and have learned quite a bit. Most notably, his colleagues on the Federal Open Market Com- Tmonetary policymakers, political leaders, and mittee deserve enormous credit both for recogniz- the public have been persuaded by two decades ing the crucial importance of achieving low and of experience that low and stable inflation has stable inflation and for the courage and persever- very substantial economic benefits. ance with which they tackled America’s critical This consensus marks a considerable change inflation problem. from the views held by many economists at the I could say much more about Volcker’s time that Paul Volcker became Fed Chairman. In achievement and its lasting benefits, but I am sure 1979, most economists would have agreed that, that many other speakers will cover that ground. in principle, low inflation promotes economic Instead, in my remaining time, I will focus on growth and efficiency in the long run. However, some lessons that economists have drawn from many also believed that, in the range of inflation the Volcker regime regarding the importance of rates typically experienced by industrial countries, credibility in central banking and how that credi- the benefits of low inflation are probably small— bility can be obtained.
    [Show full text]
  • Development of Sirococcus Shoot Blight Following Thinning In
    This file was created by scanning the printed publication. Text errors identified by the software have been corrected; however, some errors may remain. United States Department of Development of Sirococcus Agriculture Forest Service Shoot Blight Following Thinning in Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Western Hemlock Regeneration Experiment Station Research Note Charles G. Shaw III, Thomas H. Laurent, and PNW-387 May 1981 Spencer Israelson Abstract Shoot mortality from Sirococcus strobilinus Preuss. and other causes was recorded by crown position from April 1978 through October 1979 in young- growth western hemlock [Tsuga heterophylla (Raf.) Sarg.] crop trees released in a 1977 thinning at Thomas Bay, Alaska. All study trees contained some infected shoots, but no terminal leaders were killed by shoot blight. On individual trees, the number of shoots killed by S. strobilinus between April 1978 and October 1979 was significantly correlated with the level of shoot blight mortality present in April 1978. Disease occurrence was highest in the lower crown, but differences in the level of shoot mortality between lower, middle, and upper crown locations were not significant. Disease occurrence during 1978 and 1979 was markedly lower than that in 1976 and 1977. After thinning, shoot blight appears to be causing little damage to hemlock crop trees; suggesting that thinning operations can proceed at Thomas Bay with confidence that the selected crop trees will suffer little, if any, damage from the disease. Keywords: Shoot blight, diseases (plant), western hemlock, Tsuga heterophylla Alaska (Thomas Bay). Introduction Western hemlock [Tsuga heterophylla (Raf.) Sarg.] regeneration in southeast Alaska is commonly attacked by the shoot blight fungus, Sirococcus strobilinus Preuss.
    [Show full text]
  • George C. Mdrrhall Space Flight Center Marshall Space F/@T Center, Alabdrnd
    NASA TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM (NASA-TU-78262) A PRELI8INABY LOOK AT N80- 18636 AVE-SESAHE 1 CONDUCTED 0U 10-11 APRIL 1979 (8lASA) 52 p HC AO4/HP A01 CSCL 040 Unclas G3/47 47335 A PRELIMINARY LOOK AT AVE-SESAME I CONDUCTED ON APRIL 10-1 1, 1979 By Steven F. Williams, James R. Scoggins, Nicholas Horvath, and Kelly Hill February 1980 NASA George C. Mdrrhall Space Flight Center Marshall Space F/@t Center, Alabdrnd MBFC - Form 3190 (Rev June 1971) ,. .. .. .. , . YAFrl," I?? CONTENTS Page LIST OF FIGURES ........................... iv LIST OF TABLES ............................ vii 1. OBJECTIVES AND SCOPE ...................... 1 2. DATA COLLECTGD ......................... 1 a. Rawinsonde Soundinps.... .................... 1 b. Surface a* Upper -Air -..+ .................... 4 3. SMOPTIC CONDITIONS ....................... 4 a. Synoptic Charts ....................... 4 b. Radar.. .......................... 5 c. Satellite.. ........................ 5 4. SEVERE AND UNUSUAL WkXPIk h. REPORTED ............... 37 PRriCICDINQ PAGE BUNK NOT FKMED iii - .%; . ,,. r* , . * *. '' ,..'~ LIST OE' FIGURES Figure Page Location of rawinsonde stations participating in the AVE-SESAME I experiment ................. 3 Synoptic charts for 1200 GMT. 10 April 1979 ....... 6 Surface chart for 1800 GMT. 10 April 1979 ........ 9 Synoptic charts for 0000 GMT. 11 April 1979 ....... 10 Surface chart for 0600 GMT. 11 April 1979 ........ 13 Synoptic charts for 1200 GMT. 11 April 1979 ....... 14 Radar sunmxy for 1435 GMT. 10 April 1979 ........ 17 Radar summary for 1935 GMT. 10 ~pril1979 ........ 17 Radar summary for 2235 GMT. 10 April1979 ........ 18 Radar sumnary for 0135 GMT. 11 ~pril1979 ........ 18 Radar summary for 0235 GMT. 11 ~pril1979 ........ 19 Radar sununary for 0435 GMT. 11 April 1979 ........ 19 Radar summary for 0535 GMT. 11 April 1979 .......
    [Show full text]
  • What Have We Learned Since October 1979? by Alan S. Blinder Princeton
    What Have We Learned since October 1979? by Alan S. Blinder Princeton University CEPS Working Paper No. 105 April 2005 “What Have We Learned since October 1979?” by Alan S. Blinder Princeton University∗ My good friend Ben Bernanke is always a hard act to follow. When I drafted these remarks, I was concerned that Ben would take all the best points and cover them extremely well, leaving only some crumbs for Ben McCallum and me to pick up. But his decision to concentrate on one issue—central bank credibility—leaves me plenty to talk about. Because Ben was so young in 1979, I’d like to begin by emphasizing that Paul Volcker re-taught the world something it seemed to have forgotten at the time: that tight monetary policy can bring inflation down at substantial, but not devastating, cost. It seems strange to harbor contrary thoughts today, but back then many people believed that 10% inflation was so deeply ingrained in the U.S. economy that we might to doomed to, say, 6-10% inflation for a very long time. For example, Otto Eckstein (1981, pp. 3-4) wrote in a well-known 1981 book that “To bring the core inflation rate down significantly through fiscal and monetary policies alone would require a prolonged deep recession bordering on depression, with the average unemployment rate held above 10%.” More concretely, he estimated that it would require 10 point-years of unemployment to bring the core inflation rate down a single percentage point,1 which is about five times more than called for by the “Brookings rule of thumb.”2 In the event, the Volcker disinflation followed the Brookings rule of thumb rather well.
    [Show full text]
  • Democracy and the Nature of American Influence in Iran, 1941-1979'
    H-Diplo Shannon on Collier, 'Democracy and the Nature of American Influence in Iran, 1941-1979' Review published on Sunday, October 1, 2017 David R. Collier. Democracy and the Nature of American Influence in Iran, 1941-1979. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press, 2017. 448 pp. $75.00 (paper), ISBN 978-0-8156-3497-3. Reviewed by Matthew Shannon (Emory & Henry College) Published on H-Diplo (October, 2017) Commissioned by Seth Offenbach David Collier has offered an innovate reading of US-Iran relations from 1941 to 1979. He begins by reminding readers that scholars too often “neglect” the “all-encompassing approach” to studying the binational relationship during the reign of Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi (p. 5). Indeed, I have suggested that this is a significant historiographic intervention, as diplomatic histories on the period are divided between two genres.[1] The first is that of the sweeping narrative similar to the works of Barry Rubin, James Bill, and Richard Cottam in the 1980s.[2] The second genre, Collier notes, consists of “snapshots” of events such as the 1953 coup (p. 5). As the US government has declassified more documents, the literature has moved beyond the reporting of Rubin and the history-memoirs of Bill and Cottam to archive-based research on moments ranging from John F. Kennedy’s presidency to Jimmy Carter’s handling of the Iranian Revolution. Today, historians are in a position to revisit the entirety of the US relationship with the last shah, and that is what Collier does through “the framework of linkage and leverage” (p. 3). He borrows the concept from political scientists Steven Levitsky and Lucan Way’s 2010 book Competitive Authoritarianism to explain how US leverage over the shah’s behavior waxed and waned during his rule, and how connections between the two societies did or did not facilitate democracy promotion.
    [Show full text]
  • The Shape of the 1980S: Demographic, Economic, and Travel Characteristics
    Transportation Research Record 807 27 reductions in use through price alone. In the REFERENCES aggregate, these effects are likely to cancel out and result in growth in VMT of 40-50 percent higher 1. Highway Travel Forecasts. FHWA, Nov. 1974. than during the 1975-1995 period. 2. N.S. Erlbaum, D.T. Hartgen, G.S. Cohen. NYS Other important demographic and economic factors Gasoline Use: Impact of Supply Restrictions and could significantly change these projections. Embargoes, New York State Department of Trans­ Trends toward greater automobile ownership per portation, Albany, Prelim. Res. Rept. 142, Aug. household but declining household size could add as 1978. mu,ch as 23 percent to travel projections over the 3. D.T. Hartgen and N.S. Erlbaum. Long-Range same period i decreasing urbanization could add Forecasts of Transportation Energy Consumption another 9 percent. But double-digit inflation, in New York State (Rev. Ed.). New York State higher unemployment rates, and periodic energy Department of Transportation, Albany, Prelim. supply shortages could more than cancel out these Res. Rept. 158, April 1980. effects. The net direction of all of these factors 4. Annual Automotive Fuel Economy Progress Report is difficult to determine, but on the whole, our to Congress. U.S. Department of Transportation, assessment is that, in spite of higher prices, the April 1980. likelihood of a stagnant economy, and possible 5. Charles Rivers Associates, Inc. Methods for supply shortages, travel is likely to grow, albeit Analyzing Fuel Supply Limitations on Passenger at a slower rate than in the 1960s and 1970s. Travel. NCHRP, Rept.
    [Show full text]
  • 13 November1981 TARIFFS and TRADE Limited Distribution
    RESTRICTED L/4914/Rev.5 GENERAL AGREEMENT ON 13 November1981 TARIFFS AND TRADE Limited Distribution MULTILATERAL TRADE NEGOTIATIONS Status of Acceptances of Protocols, Agreements and Arrangements (as of 9 November 1981)1 The following Protocols, Agreements and Arrangements have been accepted by the Governments listed on the dates and with the conditions or declarations specified. A. Geneva (1979) Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade - Argentina 11 July 1979 - Austria (subject to ratification) 17 October 1979 Ratification 28 December 1979 - Belgium (subject to ratification) 17 December 1979 Ratification 7 May 1981 - Canada (subject to ratification) 11 July 1979 Ratification 1 September 1981 - Czechoslovakia 16 June 1980 - Denmark (subject to ratification) 17 December 1979 Ratification with regard to the products 21 December 1979 subject to the regime of the European Coal and Steel Community and except as regards its application to the Faroe Islands - European Economic Community 13 July 1979 (For authentication of the Protocol and of the schedules of tariff concessions annexed thereto, and subject to conclusion by the European Communities in accordance with the procedures in force) Acceptance 17 December 1979 - Finland (subject to ratification) 11 July 1979 Ratification 13 March 1980 - France 17 December 1979 - Germany, Fed. Rep. (subject to ratification) 17 December 1979 Ratification 7 November 1980 The Geneva (1979) Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade shall also apply to Berlin (West) with effect from the date on which it enters into force for the Federal Republic of Germany 1This document consolidates the information contained in documents L/4914/Rev.4 and Adds.
    [Show full text]
  • Maps Cited by Congress When Designating Wilderness
    Maps Summary Table In 2003 long-time NPS Wilderness Coordinator Wes Henry prepared this table that was intended for inclusion in the updated Reference Manual 41 – Wilderness Management. Wes died soon thereafter. PEER has updated the table to reflect information through 2014. RM 41: Section F: DRAFT January 21, 2003 Maps Cited by Congress when Designating Wilderness. The table lists in: Column 2: maps cited by Congress when designating NPS wilderness (in chronological order by date of enactment); Column 3: date of an official legal description prepared after designation, and Column 4: whether a post-enactment official boundary map was prepared. NPS AREA – CONGRESSIONAL DATE OF DATE OF WILDERNESS MAP NUMBER OFFICIAL OFFICAL MAP DATE AND DATE, CITED LEGAL IN LAW DESCRIPTION Craters of the 131-91,000 December 1970 NPS cited Moon – Oct. 1970 March 1970 legislative map Petrified Forest - NP-PF-3320-O December 1970 NPS cited October 1970 November 1967 legislative map Lava Beds – NM-LB-3227H December 1972 NPS cited October 1972 August 1972 legislative map Lassen Volcanic – NP-LV-9013C June 1973 NPS cited October 1972 August 1972 legislative map Point Reyes – 612-90,000-B May 1978 February 1977 October 1976 September 1976 Bandelier – 315-20,014-B August 1978 August 1978 October 1976 May 1976 Black Canyon of 144-20,017 January 1977 January 1977 the Gunnison – May 1973 October 1976 Chiricahua - 145-20,007-A May 1978 January 1977 October 1976 September 1973 Great Sand Dunes 140-20,006-C December 1976; January 1980 October 1976 February 1976 Revised:
    [Show full text]
  • Day by Day Care Newsletter: October 1979 - June 1980 Center for Public Affairs Research (CPAR) University of Nebraska at Omaha
    University of Nebraska at Omaha DigitalCommons@UNO Publications Archives, 1963-2000 Center for Public Affairs Research 1979 Day by Day Care Newsletter: October 1979 - June 1980 Center for Public Affairs Research (CPAR) University of Nebraska at Omaha Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/cparpubarchives Part of the Demography, Population, and Ecology Commons, and the Public Affairs Commons Recommended Citation (CPAR), Center for Public Affairs Research, "Day by Day Care Newsletter: October 1979 - June 1980" (1979). Publications Archives, 1963-2000. 75. https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/cparpubarchives/75 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Center for Public Affairs Research at DigitalCommons@UNO. It has been accepted for inclusion in Publications Archives, 1963-2000 by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UNO. For more information, please contact [email protected]. VOLUME I, Number 1 October, 1979 LEAVES I like to rake the leaves Division of Continuing Education for Western Nebraska, Into a great big hump. part of the University of Nebraska system. Then I go. back a little way, Bend both knees, I don't have to introduce Marcia Nance and And jump! Jean Mellor to you because you know the good work that they have been doing. Marcia and Jean have agreed to continue on the team so you will see them at some of the workshops. They will be working with us through Kearney State which will represent us in the mid-state area. I'm Ginger Burch, coordinator of the Day Care Training and Service Program. We are really excited about the program this year.
    [Show full text]
  • 45 FR 36901 (May 30, 1980)
    FEDERAL REGISTER: 45 FR 36901 (May 30, 1980) DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR AGENCY: Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement (OSM) 30 CFR 716.17, 717.17, 816.42, 816.46, 817.42, and 817.46 DOI-OSM Discharge from Mine Areas: Revision of Standards for Effluent Limits and Sedimentation Ponds Legal Authority Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977, 30 U.S.C. Sec. 1201 et seq. SUMMARY: REASON FOR INCLUDING THIS ENTRY The Department of the Interior (DOI) considers these rules to be of general public interest because they concern the environment and the public health and safety, and because they will help to improve the quality of the waters of the United States. STATEMENT OF PROBLEM On December 13, 1977, the Office of Surface Mining (OSM) published initial regulations for control of sediment in discharges from areas of surface coal mining and reclamation activities, and on March 13, 1979, published final regulations. The rules established specific limitations -- called "effluent limitations" -- on the total suspended solids (TSS) iron and manganese content of the discharges from the mining area. The rules also required that all runoff be passed through sedimentation ponds and established minimum design criteria for these ponds. Essentially, sedimentation ponds improve the quality of discharges by detaining runoff until heavier particles settle to the bottom of the pond. The TSS limitations were essentially the same as those established by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) on April 26, 1977, (42 FR 21380), and on January 12, 1979, (44 FR 2586). EPA's regulations were promulgated pursuant to the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C.
    [Show full text]