Unemployment Grows As Welfare Limits Approach
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
By Rudolph Katz
With De Leon Since ’89 By Rudolph Katz Published Online by Socialist Labor Party of America http://slp.org August 2007 WITH DE LEON SINCE ’89 By Rudolph Katz PRINTING HISTORY With De Leon Since ’89 was serialized in the New York WEEKLY PEOPLE from March 20, 1915, to January 29, 1916, and subsequently included in the volume, Daniel De Leon: The Man and His Work, published by the New York Labor News, as follows: FIRST PRINTING ......................................................................... June 1919 SECOND PRINTING ............................................................... August 1919 THIRD PRINTING ................................................................ October 1926 FOURTH PRINTING ................................................................. April 1934 FIFTH PRINTING ................................................................... January 1969 ONLINE EDITION ................................................................... August 2007 PRIOR TO 1889. Collapse of the Henry George Movement—Dissension in the Early Labor Movement—Ill-Starred Rosenberg-Busche Struggle for Sounder S.L.P. Political Policy N 1887 THE HENRY GEORGE MOVEMENT went to pieces. Only a year Ibefore, in 1886, Henry George, candidate for mayor of New York on the ticket of the United Labor Party, had loomed up a big figure in the political arena. Sixty-eight thousand (68,000) votes were cast for Henry George, not in modern Greater New York, but in old New York limited to a much smaller number of voters than are now eligible to vote in the Borough of Manhattan alone. The fact is also to be borne in mind that this happened in the days when ballot-box stuffing was quite freely indulged in, repeating being practiced by both Tammany Hall and the Republican Party. So general was this foul practice that men boasted openly of having voted early and often; and many, in fact, considered themselves good American citizens because they not only voted once on election day, but a number of times, each time in a different district. -
1916 — 14Th NATIONAL CONVENTION
Fourteenth National Convention Socialist Labor Party April 29–May 2, 1916 Minutes, Reports, Resolutions, Etc. Published Online September 2011 Socialist Labor Party P.O. Box 218 Mountain View, CA 94042-0218 Proceedings of the 14th National Convention Socialist Labor Party April 29–May 2, 1916 World Building, Room 506, New York City MORNING SESSION, SATURDAY, APRIL 29 National Secretary Arnold Petersen opened the convention at 10 A.M. Temporary Organization Arthur E. Reimer of Massachusetts was elected temporary chair- man; Albert Schnabel of Wisconsin was elected temporary secretary; Donald Munro of Virginia was elected temporary vice-chairman. Chairman Reimer requested the delegates to rise in honor of our beloved Comrade De Leon, which request was cheerfully complied with. The Reception Committee of Section New York welcomed the dele- gates in the name of the Section. Credentials Committee The following Committee on Credentials was elected: Richard Koeppel of Ohio, Charles H. Seaholm of Scandinavian Federation of S.L.P., and William Cox of Missouri. A recess of 10 minutes was taken to await the report of the Creden- tials Committee. The Credentials Committee reported and recommended that the following delegates be seated: California: 1. Ernest Pfister; 2. Robert Roadhouse.1 Illinois: Frank Zermann. Indiana: John J. Burkhardt. Maryland: Worden H. Mills. Massachusetts: 1. Oscar Kinsalas; 2. Arthur Reimer. Michigan: Herman Richter. 1 The names of the California delegates were stricken because they did not attend the convention.—Secretary. Socialist Labor Party 2 www.slp.org FOUR TEENTH NATI ONAL CONVENTI ON Minnesota: Gerald J. Sherwood.1 Missouri: William H. Cox. New Jersey: 1. -
V6n06-W62-Jun-1923-Liberator.Pdf
o f ~3 \0 CONC ERNING OURS ELVE S You who read these lines (and we who write them) are of many OpiL ion representing rr. any school o f political and economic thought . Our beli efs on rna y s u bjects are sharply at var iancf ; upon sorre we he3rtily agre ; upon other we ap roach unanimity a t various points . But upon ON E ub j ec t we ALL agree- THAT THE LIBERATOR IS WORTH WHI LE . Our g ood friend , The Honorable H. G. Tucker , of the Wi s con in Legislature , about expresses the i dea : he write , " Althoug h I disagree with the policy of your magazine in its strong l eaning t o wa rds Communism and d o not believe it to be t he best p olicy for t he political as well as the economic jnteres t s of the workers o f this country , I ne vertheless enjoy the arr i val pf your magazine . It is to the reader , what t h e desert is to a good meal ." Many will say that Mr . Tucker mistakes the meal for the desert , but this only pro ves the a dm itted rule of d isag reeme nt. Whate ver difference s of taste there may be in our political and economlC palates , unanimity is reached in thl: The Liberator is VITALLY NECESSARY to the American labor moveme nt . It fills a p l ace in the liter~t ure of this mo vement which p rog ress toward the ful filment o f Labor ' s dest i ny demand s be fille d . -
National Convention
--I NATIONAL CONVENTION SOCIALIST LABOR PARTY >fay 5-10, 1920. REPORTS, RESOLUTIONS, PLATFORM., ETC. Published 1921 . National Executi,ve Commitlee, Socialist Labor Party, 45 Rose Street New York NATIONAL CONVENTION SOCIALIST LABOR PARTY Mag 5-10, 1920. REPORTS, RESOLUTIONS, PLATFORM’, ETC. Published 1921 National Executi,ve Committee, Socialist Labor Party, 45 Rose Street New York : ‘., . The modem revolutionist knows find the revolutionist putting himself full well. that man is not superior to above the organization. The opposite principle, that principle is superior to conduct is an unmstakable earmark man, but ‘he does not fly off the han- of reformers. dle with the maxim, and thus turn the The revolutionist recognizes that maxim into absurdity. He firmly the present machinery and methods couples the maxim with this other, of production render impossible-and that no principle is superior to the well it is they do-the individual free- movement or organization that puts dom of man such as our savage an- it and upholds it in the field.. .He cestors knew the thing; that, today, knows that in the revolution demand- the highest individual freedom must ed by our age, Organization must be go hand in hand with collective free- the incarnation of Principle. Just the ,dom; and none such is possible with- reverse of the reformer, who will ever out a central directing authority. be seen mocking at science, the revo- ‘Standing upon this vigor-imparting lutionist will not make a distinction high plane of civilization, the revolu- between the Organization and the tionist is virile and selfreliant, in Principle. -
Slp National Candidates (Pdf)
VOTE FOR PRESIDENTIAL AND VICE PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES OF THE SOCIALIST LABOR PARTY Vote States on Year For President For Vice President Reported Ballot 1892 Simon Wing, Mass. Charles H. Matchett, N.Y. 21,173 5 1896 Charles H. Matchett, N.Y. Matthew Maguire, N.J. 36,367 20 1900 Joseph F. Malloney, Mass. Valentine Remmel, Pa. 33,382 22 1904 Charles H. Corregan, N.Y. William W. Cox, Ill. 33,510 19 1908 August Gillhaus, N.Y.* Donald L. Munro, Va. 14,029 15 1912 Arthur E. Reimer, Mass. August Gillhaus, N.Y. 29,213 20 1916 Arthur E. Reimer, Mass. Caleb Harrison, Ill. 14,670 17 1920 William W. Cox, Mo. August Gillhaus, N.Y. 30,513 14 1924 Frank T. Johns, Ore. Verne L. Reynolds, Md. 33,883 19 1928 Verne L. Reynolds, Mich.** Jeremiah D. Crowley, N.Y. 21,590 19 1932 Verne L. Reynolds, N.Y. John W. Aiken, Mass. 34,038 19 1936 John W. Aiken, Mass. Emil F. Teichert, N.Y. 12,788 18 1940 John W. Aiken, Mass. Aaron M. Orange, N.Y. 14,883 14 1944 Edward A. Teichert, Pa. Arla A. Albaugh, Ohio 45,336 15 1948 Edward A. Teichert, Pa. Stephen Emery, N.Y. 29,272 22 1952 Eric Hass, N.Y. Stephen Emery, N.Y. 30,426 23 1956 Eric Hass, N.Y. Georgia Cozzini, Wis. 44,547 14 1960 Eric Hass, N.Y. Georgia Cozzini, Wis. 47,647 15 1964 Eric Hass, N.Y. Henning A. Blomen, Mass. 45,319 16 1968 Henning A. Blomen, Mass. George S. -
Class Struggle, the Communist Party and The
CLASS STRUGGLE, THE COMMUNIST PARTY, AND THE POPULAR FRONT IN CANADA, 1935-1939 A Thesis Submitted to the Committee on Graduate Studies in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in the Faculty of Arts and Science TRENT UNIVERSITY Peterborough, Ontario, Canada © Copyright by Martin Schoots-McAlpine, 2016 Canadian and Indigenous Studies M.A. Graduate Program January 2017 ABSTRACT Class Struggle, The Communist Party, and the Popular Front in Canada, 1935-1939 Martin Schoots-McAlpine This thesis is an attempt to provide a critical history of the Communist Party of Canada (CPC) during the Popular Front era, roughly November 1935 to September 1939. This study contains a detailed examination of the various stages of the Popular Front in Canada (the united front, the height of the Popular Front, and the Democratic front), with special attention paid to the CPC’s activities in: the youth movement, the labour movement, the unemployed movement, the peace movement, and the anti-fascist movement. From this I conclude that the implementation of the Popular Front, the transformation of the CPC from a revolutionary party to a bourgeois party, was not a smooth process, but instead was punctuated and resisted by elements within the CPC in what can be considered a process of class struggle internal to the CPC itself. Keywords: Communist Party of Canada, communism, Soviet Union, labour, Popular Front, Great Depression, socialism, Canada ii Acknowledgements I would first like to express my gratitude to my supervisor, Dr. Bryan Palmer, for his patience and assistance in writing this thesis. I benefitted greatly from his expertise in the field. -
National Convention
Fifteenth NNAATTIIOONNAALL CCOONNVVEENNTTIIOONN Socialist Labor Party of America May 5–10, 1920 Published by Socialist Labor Party of America www.slp.org 2005 NATIONAL CONVENTION SOCIALIST LABOR PARTY Mag 5-10, 1920. REPORTS, RESOLUTIONS, PLATFORM’, ETC. Published 1921 National Executi,ve Committee, Socialist Labor Party, 45 Rose Street New York : ‘., . The modem revolutionist knows find the revolutionist putting himself full well. that man is not superior to above the organization. The opposite principle, that principle is superior to conduct is an unmstakable earmark man, but ‘he does not fly off the han- of reformers. dle with the maxim, and thus turn the The revolutionist recognizes that maxim into absurdity. He firmly the present machinery and methods couples the maxim with this other, of production render impossible-and that no principle is superior to the well it is they do-the individual free- movement or organization that puts dom of man such as our savage an- it and upholds it in the field.. .He cestors knew the thing; that, today, knows that in the revolution demand- the highest individual freedom must ed by our age, Organization must be go hand in hand with collective free- the incarnation of Principle. Just the ,dom; and none such is possible with- reverse of the reformer, who will ever out a central directing authority. be seen mocking at science, the revo- ‘Standing upon this vigor-imparting lutionist will not make a distinction high plane of civilization, the revolu- between the Organization and the tionist is virile and selfreliant, in Principle. He will say: “The Prin- striking contrast with the mentally ciple and the Organization are one.” sickly, and, therefore, suspicious re- former.