A Questionable History of the Holocaust

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Questionable History of the Holocaust Alex Kershaw. The Envoy: The Epic Rescue of the Last Jews of Europe in the Desperate Closing Months of World War II. Cambridge: Da Capo Press, Incorporated, 2010. x + 294 pp. $26.00, cloth, ISBN 978-0-306-81557-7. Reviewed by Shlomo Aronson Published on H-Judaic (February, 2011) Commissioned by Jason Kalman (Hebrew Union College - Jewish Institute of Religion) This book focuses on the Holocaust in Hun‐ appointment of Eichmann to destroy the last Jew‐ gary by comparing the roles, the behavior, and ish community in Europe, and Eichmann's march the motivation of Adolf Eichmann, the Nazi into that country "hot on the heels of no less than henchman responsible for deporting Hungarian eleven Wehrmacht divisions" (p. 17). Information Jews to Auschwitz, to that of Raoul Wallenberg, concerning Eichmann's aides Theodor Danneker the savior of Hungarian Jews, while telling the and Dieter Wisliceny is also provided, especially stories of the victims and some survivors. It be‐ the former's crimes against the Jews of France, in‐ gins with the Wannsee Conference of January cluding using Jewesses as "high-class whores." 1942, where Reinhard Heydrich, chief of the Nazi Chapter 4 discusses Hungarian fascists who wel‐ terror and murder organizations and Eichmann's comed the invading Germans, and who created supreme boss next to SS chief Himmler, discussed for them the necessary apparatus for deporting the "Final Solution of the Jewish Question" in Eu‐ the Jews from the Hungarian province, while the rope with the representatives of the German civil Germans occupied Budapest city and created a bureaucracy. The second chapter tells the story of "Jewish Council" therein. a Jewish family in Slovakia, where the "Final Solu‐ These four chapters are unfortunately based tion" had begun, and where "Jewish women were on outdated secondary literature and hearsay. kidnapped by the SS to be used as sex slaves on They also include a number of factual mistakes. the Eastern Front." (p. 9). They fed Slovakia and Heydrich was not an Austrian "like Eichmann" (p. found refuge in Hungary, where Jews were pro‐ 4) but was born in Halle/Salle, Prussian Saxony, tected until the German occupation in March while Eichmann was born in Solingen, Rhineland, 1944. Germany. His family moved later to Linz, Austria. Chapter 3 recounts SS chief Heinrich Himm‐ Such mistakes suggest careless research, which ler's preparations for occupying Hungary and his becomes serious when the author repeats hearsay H-Net Reviews about Jewish women kidnapped by the SS in Slo‐ Jewish power in Hungary, not without some diffi‐ vakia to be used as sex slaves on the eastern front. culties."[1] Second in command was Dr. Hans-Ul‐ Sexual relations between Jews and "Arians" were rich Geschke, SS colonel and later general, Com‐ forbidden by the Nuremberg race laws of 1935. mander of the Security Police (Gestapo and Crimi‐ Slovakia was not occupied by the Germans. About nal Police) and SD (Nazi Intelligence) in Hungary. two-thirds of its Jewish population was deported He toppled Horthy in favor of the fascist Hungari‐ to Auschwitz by the Slovak government, which an Arrow Cross following Horthy's decision to stopped the deportations on its own--a story that spare the Jews of Budapest City. Both of them es‐ Zionist rescue workers in Hungary misinterpret‐ caped postwar justice, but not Eichmann, who ed, believing that the Germans were ready to stop was personally known to his Jewish interlocutors. the Final Solution altogether. Although not dis‐ The second part of the book treats the so- cussed in this book, the records of Slovak negotia‐ called Auschwitz Protocols, the famous Vraba tions with Eichmann's aide Wisliceny are re‐ Wetzler reports by Auschwitz escapees, who tried quired to understand the behavior of the Jewish to tell the world the truth about the fate awaiting Council and of the Zionist Rescue Committee in the deportees to Auschwitz. According to the au‐ Budapest when Eichmann's team arrived in Hun‐ thor's version Eichmann denied the reports in a gary, Wisliceny included. Moreover, Hungary was meeting with Rudolf Kasztner, the Zionist rescue occupied by a relatively small number of German operative, who was still hoping to negotiate a res‐ troops, Budapest City excluded, in order to perpet‐ cue deal with Eichmann--having no idea about the uate the image of an invitation made by Admiral latter's very limited competence in regard to the Horthy, the Hungarian chief of state, to the Ger‐ "Jewish Question" in Hungary or elsewhere . mans to lend support to Hungary against the Sovi‐ Chapter 6 provides a distorted version of the et threat. However, Horthy appointed an anti- so-called Brand's Mission or the "Blood for Goods" Semitic government, which collaborated with the deal, which was allegedly offered to Katzner and Germans to cleanse the Hungarian province of other Zionist operatives by Eichmann. He is de‐ the Jews. Behind them was the Wehrmacht wait‐ scribed as if he offered the Zionists--a very active ing for the Red Army. minority among Hungarian Jews eager to help Eichmann's role, as described in the latter rescue Jews wherever this proved possible using part of the book, as the main, decisive, almighty funds diverted from Palestine to Hungary--to ex‐ master of the fate of the Hungarian Jews, is based change one million Hungarian Jews for Western on outdated impressions of Jewish leaders who Allied strategic goods such as trucks and other had direct contact with him. In fact the deporta‐ commodities. Again, unfortunately, the author re‐ tions of the Jews from the Hungarian province lies on too limited source material: one primary were dictated by the Wehrmacht, which per‐ but obsolete Zionist source in English, and Ben ceived in them, on top of their own racist policies, Hecht's Perfidy (1961) to describe this complex is‐ a security risk upon the arrival of the Red Army at sue. He has not examined the German records the Hungarian border. Eichmann's role was an now available, any German or Hebrew sources, or important part of the Final Solution in Hungary, any of the recent scholarship on this "deal" by ei‐ yet he was the third cog in the SS machinery in ther the present reviewer (Hitler, the Allies, and Hungary. First was Otto Winkelmann, SS Ober‐ the Jews, 2006) or others. "Perfidy" was one of the gruppenfuehrer (full general) and Higher SS and cases of politicizing the Holocaust following the Police Officer in Hungary, who cabled Himmler so-called Kasztner Trial in Israel, in which Kaszt‐ after the successful operation against the Jews in ner, the representative of the Labor Party Mapai the Hungarian province that "we have broken the 2 H-Net Reviews in Hungary, found himself accused of collabora‐ ian Jews could not be brought out of Nazi-occu‐ tion with Eichmann. In exchange for the rescue of pied Hungary under wartime conditions, in a con‐ a small group consisting of his family and a few versation with Moshe Shertok, the Zionist foreign dignitaries, he was accused of hiding the terrible minister, who tried to use Brand's Mission to gain fate awaiting the vast majority of Hungarian Jew‐ time, if possible, during which the Final Solution ry. He was assassinated by right-wing extremists in Hungary would be suspended. Brand was ac‐ as a result. Similarily, Mapai's leaders in Palestine, companied by Bundy Grosz, a converted Hungari‐ David Ben-Gurion most significantly, were ac‐ an Jew who offered the British and the Americans cused of collaboration with the British authorities a "real deal," i.e., negotiations on separate peace in regard to Brand's Mission. Joel Brand was ar‐ agreements between the SD and the West against rested by the British while pursuing his mission, the Soviet Union. Thus, Grosz's role and British in‐ and when interrogated by Lord Moyne, the British telligence decryptions and German records now Minister Resident in the Middle East, he was available tell us that the Nazis never intended to asked by Moyne--"and what shall I do with a mil‐ release Jews in large numbers, and that the "truck lion Jews?" (p. 48). This sentence became a model deal" was a brain child of Fritz Laufer, a half-Jew‐ case for the "world's" behavior during the Holo‐ ish traitor and enemy agent, endorsed by Brand caust, and justified ex post facto the assassination and suggested by him to Eichmann, who readily of Lord Moyne at the hands of the Stern Gang in accepted it. Nevertheless, Kasztner continued the November 1944. Brand himself joined the Stern negotiations with Eichmann as if Brand's Mission Gang after the war and gave them the justification was still on and managed to release 1,684 promi‐ for Moyne's assassination, which became a part of nent Jews (including his wife and in-laws; the rest the legacy of the Israeli Right. of his large family was deported to Auschwitz) as However, the whole story pertaining to a sign of good will by the other side, and later the Brand's Mission as described by Ben Hecht, by rescue of no less than 20,000 Jews--whole families Brand himself, by Mapai's political enemies dur‐ included--who survived the war. Finally, he was ing Kastzner's trial, and by our author has noth‐ able to split the SS murder machine itself. In his ing to do with the realities of the Holocaust. To be‐ last effort to save Jews, mostly Hungarians, who gin with, Eichmann had no competence to strike were marched by foot from Auschwitz and other the rescue deal attributed to him, nor were the places for work in Germany and interned upon Germans interested in a deal to save the Jews of arrival in concentration camps, Kasztner succeed‐ Hungary, but in using them to split the Allies (the ed, preventing their execution ordered by the iso‐ trucks were intended to fght the Red Army lated Hitler in his Berlin bunker.
Recommended publications
  • Holocaust/Shoah the Organization of the Jewish Refugees in Italy Holocaust Commemoration in Present-Day Poland
    NOW AVAILABLE remembrance a n d s o l i d a r i t y Holocaust/Shoah The Organization of the Jewish Refugees in Italy Holocaust Commemoration in Present-day Poland in 20 th century european history Ways of Survival as Revealed in the Files EUROPEAN REMEMBRANCE of the Ghetto Courts and Police in Lithuania – LECTURES, DISCUSSIONS, remembrance COMMENTARIES, 2012–16 and solidarity in 20 th This publication features the century most significant texts from the european annual European Remembrance history Symposium (2012–16) – one of the main events organized by the European Network Remembrance and Solidarity in Gdańsk, Berlin, Prague, Vienna and Budapest. The 2017 issue symposium entitled ‘Violence in number the 20th-century European history: educating, commemorating, 5 – december documenting’ will take place in Brussels. Lectures presented there will be included in the next Studies issue. 2016 Read Remembrance and Solidarity Studies online: enrs.eu/studies number 5 www.enrs.eu ISSUE NUMBER 5 DECEMBER 2016 REMEMBRANCE AND SOLIDARITY STUDIES IN 20TH CENTURY EUROPEAN HISTORY EDITED BY Dan Michman and Matthias Weber EDITORIAL BOARD ISSUE EDITORS: Prof. Dan Michman Prof. Matthias Weber EDITORS: Dr Florin Abraham, Romania Dr Árpád Hornják, Hungary Dr Pavol Jakubčin, Slovakia Prof. Padraic Kenney, USA Dr Réka Földváryné Kiss, Hungary Dr Ondrej Krajňák, Slovakia Prof. Róbert Letz, Slovakia Prof. Jan Rydel, Poland Prof. Martin Schulze Wessel, Germany EDITORIAL COORDINATOR: Ewelina Pękała REMEMBRANCE AND SOLIDARITY STUDIES IN 20TH CENTURY EUROPEAN HISTORY PUBLISHER: European Network Remembrance and Solidarity ul. Wiejska 17/3, 00–480 Warszawa, Poland www.enrs.eu, [email protected] COPY-EDITING AND PROOFREADING: Caroline Brooke Johnson PROOFREADING: Ramon Shindler TYPESETTING: Marcin Kiedio GRAPHIC DESIGN: Katarzyna Erbel COVER DESIGN: © European Network Remembrance and Solidarity 2016 All rights reserved ISSN: 2084–3518 Circulation: 500 copies Funded by the Federal Government Commissioner for Culture and the Media upon a Decision of the German Bundestag.
    [Show full text]
  • UCSB History 133B Essay
    Aubrey Cox Prof. Marcuse UCSB Hist 133B Source Exploration 6 March, 2019 The Wetzler-Vrba Report Could Have Saved Many UCSB History 133B Drawing by Rudolf Vrba (1924–2006) and Alfred Wetzler (1918–1988) - German Extermination Camps— Auschwitz and Birkenau, Executive Office of the United States War RefugeeEssay Board, 16 November 1944. The U.S. War Refugee Board was the first to published this version of the report. See en:Auschwitz Protocols. Our source: Randolph L. Braham, Scott Miller, The Nazis' Last Victims: The Holocaust in Hungary, Wayne State University Press, 2002, 62., Public Domain, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=50340014 “Report by Alfred Wetzler and Rudolf Vrba, two Escapees from Auschwitz (Late April 1944)” GHDI - Document. Accessed February 07, 2019. http://germanhistorydocs.ghi- dc.org/sub_document.cfm?document_id=1535. Alfred Wetzler and Rudolf Vrba were two Jewish Slovakians who escaped from Auschwitz in April 1944. After a harrowing eighteen days Vrba and Wetzler finally arrieved in Zilina, Slovakia where they connected with other Jews to whom they dictated their report They compiled a report with as detailed information as they could with details of the camp and its 2 workings. Wetzler and Vrba’s original aim was to warn Hungarian Jews of the horrors that awaited them in the planned deportations from Hungary. By the end of April 1944, the report had reached Hungary’s Jewish leaders. Little credence was given to the warning however, and hundreds of thousands of Hungarian Jews were sent to Nazi death camps, particularly Auschwitz. According to GHDI it wasn’t until the report was published in a Swiss newspaper--which brought the attention of the world to what was going on at Auschwitz-- thatUCSB the Hungarian government attempted to put a stop to the mass deportations.
    [Show full text]
  • Jewish Survival in Budapest, March 1944 – February 1945
    DECISIONS AMID CHAOS: JEWISH SURVIVAL IN BUDAPEST, MARCH 1944 – FEBRUARY 1945 Allison Somogyi A thesis submitted to the faculty at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in the Department of History. Chapel Hill 2014 Approved by: Christopher Browning Chad Bryant Konrad Jarausch © 2014 Allison Somogyi ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii ABSTRACT Allison Somogyi: Decisions amid Chaos: Jewish Survival in Budapest, March 1944 – February 1945 (Under the direction of Chad Bryant) “The Jews of Budapest are completely apathetic and do virtually nothing to save themselves,” Raoul Wallenberg stated bluntly in a dispatch written in July 1944. This simply was not the case. In fact, Jewish survival in World War II Budapest is a story of agency. A combination of knowledge, flexibility, and leverage, facilitated by the chaotic violence that characterized Budapest under Nazi occupation, helped to create an atmosphere in which survival tactics were common and widespread. This unique opportunity for agency helps to explain why approximately 58 percent of Budapest’s 200,000 Jews survived the war while the total survival rate for Hungarian Jews was only 26 percent. Although unique, the experience of Jews within Budapest’s city limits is not atypical and suggests that, when fortuitous circumstances provided opportunities for resistance, European Jews made informed decisions and employed everyday survival tactics that often made the difference between life and death. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank everybody who helped me and supported me while writing and researching this thesis. First and foremost I must acknowledge the immense support, guidance, advice, and feedback given to me by my advisor, Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Private Kaltman by Michael Kaltman
    HERITAGE THE JEWISH GENEALOGICAL SOCIETY OF ILLINOIS VOLUME XXVII • NUMBER I SPRING 2012 ‘Saving’ Private Kaltman by Michael Kaltman This discussion explores three sometimes overlooked sources of information about relatives who served in the United States military during World War I. As in the case cited below, this information can give a more complete picture of that relative than the more commonly cited genealogical resources can, thereby “saving” them from obscurity. As a bonus, the information also provides a plausible explanation for the Ellis Island ship manifests of Private Kaltman’s parents. Schmerke Kaltman came to America in 1910 on the re-internment in U.S. military cemeteries in France, and SS Estonia, sailing out of Libau, Russian Empire (now the program to repatriate the bodies of soldiers. Also, Liepaja, Latvia). He was approximately 18 years old Laskin has included extensive reference citations and was listed as a “Hairdresser.” His trip began on all aspects of the war, including divisional in Samokhvalovichi, a tiny settlement about histories. 12 miles south-southwest of Minsk, Belarus. Sometime after his arrival in Laskin’s direct writing style sparked a America, Schmerke Americanized renewed interest in finding out about his name to Samuel. From his Samuel. After surfing the Internet, I naturalization records and his WWI decided to start my search with the Draft Registration Card, we know three volume Soldiers of the Great that his complexion was “dark,” his War by Haulsee, Howe, and Doyle, height was 5 feet 5 inches, and he 1920. This enormous compendium had a “medium” build. He owned lists every soldier who lost his life a barbershop on Avenue B in New in the war.
    [Show full text]
  • The Jerusalem Report February 6, 2017 Wikipedia Wikipedia
    Books A traitor in Budapest Rudolf Kasztner was not a hero but an unscrupulous Nazi collaborator, insists British historian Paul Bogdanor in his new book By Tibor Krausz REZSŐ KASZTNER was a much-maligned Was Kasztner, the de facto head of the Bogdanor’s book is a meticulously re- hero of the Holocaust. Or he was a villain- Zionist Aid and Rescue Committee in Bu- searched, cogently argued and at times ous Nazi collaborator. It depends who you dapest, eagerly liaising with Adolf Eich- riveting indictment of Kasztner, which ask and how you look at it. Over 70 years mann and his henchmen so as to save any is bound to reopen debate on the wartime after the end of World War II and almost 60 Hungarian Jews he could from deportation Zionist leader’s role in the destruction of years after his death, the Jewish-Hungarian and certain death in Auschwitz-Birkenau? Hungary’s Jewish community. Zionist leader remains a highly controver- Or was he doing so out of sheer self-inter- sial figure. est in order to make himself indispensable IN APRIL and May 1944, the author To his defenders, like Israeli histori- to the Nazis by helping send hundreds of demonstrates at length, Kasztner knew an Shoshana Ishoni-Barri and Hungar- thousands of other Jews blindly to their fate full well that the Nazis were busy deport- ian-born Canadian writer Anna Porter, through willful deception? ing Hungarian Jews to Auschwitz, where the author of “Kasztner’s Train” (2007), In his book “Kasztner’s Crime,” Brit- the gas chambers awaited them.
    [Show full text]
  • Liberation & Revenge
    Episode Guide: Murder & Intrigue March 1944–December 1944 Prime Minister Winston Churchill and General Dwight D. Eisenhower confer on the progress of the war. Overview "Murder & Intrigue" (Disc 2, Title 2, 47:57) explores the complex web of international politics spun during the last nine months of 1944. By that spring, the Allies knew about Auschwitz and had the military capability to bomb it. Yet despite the poignant pleas of Jewish leaders, the British and Americans decided not to bomb the railways or gas chambers. During the spring and summer, hundreds of thousands of Hungarian Jews were deported to Auschwitz at a time when the killing machinery had been honed to perfection. That autumn saw a significant act of resistance in Auschwitz when a group of Jewish prisoners revolted. Amazingly, before their deaths, some secretly wrote about their experiences. In the Follow-up Discussion to the program (Disc 2, Bonus Features, Title 11, Chapter 1, 6:14) Linda Ellerbee talks with Gail Smith, senior fellow at the Center for American Progress and former special assistant to the president and senior director of African affairs at the National Security Council during the Clinton Administration; and Jerry Fowler, who has taught human rights law and policy at George Mason University Law School and is director of the Committee on Conscience at the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum. Target Audience: Grades 9-12 social studies, history, and English courses Student Learning Goals • Analyze the options and actions of the international community—including the United States, Great Britain, and Jewish leaders residing outside of Nazi territory—with regard to Auschwitz as the Red Army began to overtake the Nazis in Poland.
    [Show full text]
  • Gadol Beyisrael Hagaon Hakadosh Harav Chaim Michoel Dov
    Eved Hashem – Gadol BeYisrael HaGaon HaKadosh HaRav Chaim Michoel Dov Weissmandel ZTVK "L (4. Cheshvan 5664/ 25. Oktober 1903, Debrecen, Osztrák–Magyar Monarchia – 6 Kislev 5718/ 29. November 1957, Mount Kisco, New York) Евед ХаШем – Гадоль БеИсраэль ХаГаон ХаКадош ХаРав Хаим-Михаэль-Дов Вайсмандель; Klenot medzi Klal Yisroel, Veľký Muž, Bojovník, Veľký Tzaddik, vynikajúci Talmid Chacham. Takýto človek príde na svet iba raz za pár storočí. „Je to Hrdina všetkých Židovských generácií – ale aj pre každého, kto potrebuje príklad odvážneho človeka, aby sa pozrel, kedy je potrebná pomoc pre tých, ktorí sú prenasledovaní a ohrození zničením v dnešnom svete.“ HaRav Chaim Michoel Dov Weissmandel ZTVK "L, je najväčší Hrdina obdobia Holokaustu. Jeho nadľudské úsilie o záchranu tisícov ľudí od smrti, ale tiež pokúsiť sa zastaviť Holokaust v priebehu vojny predstavuje jeden z najpozoruhodnejších príkladov Židovskej histórie úplného odhodlania a obete za účelom záchrany Židov. Nesnažil sa zachrániť iba niektorých Židov, ale všetkých. Ctil a bojoval za každý Židovský život a smútil za každou dušou, ktorú nemohol zachrániť. Nadľudské úsilie Rebeho Michoela Ber Weissmandla oddialilo deportácie viac ako 30 000 Židov na Slovensku o dva roky. Zohral vedúcu úlohu pri záchrane tisícov životov v Maďarsku, keď neúnavne pracoval na zverejňovaní „Osvienčimských protokolov“ o nacistických krutostiach a genocíde, aby „prebudil“ medzinárodné spoločenstvo. V konečnom dôsledku to ukončilo deportácie v Maďarsku a ušetrilo desiatky tisíc životov maďarských Židov. Reb Michoel Ber Weissmandel bol absolútne nebojácny. Avšak, jeho nebojácnosť sa nenarodila z odvahy, ale zo strachu ... neba. Každý deň, až do svojej smrti ho ťažil smútok pre milióny, ktorí nemohli byť spasení. 1 „Prosím, seriózne študujte Tóru,“ povedal HaRav Chaim Michoel Dov Weissmandel ZTVK "L svojim študentom, "spomína Rav Spitzer.
    [Show full text]
  • Reichskommissariat Ukraine from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia
    Create account Log in Article Talk Read Edit View history Reichskommissariat Ukraine From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia During World War II, Reichskommissariat Ukraine (abbreviated as RKU), was the civilian Navigation occupation regime of much of German-occupied Ukraine (which included adjacent areas of Reichskommissariat Ukraine Main page modern Belarus and pre-war Poland). Between September 1941 and March 1944, the Reichskommissariat of Germany Contents Reichskommissariat was administered by Reichskommissar Erich Koch. The ← → Featured content administration's tasks included the pacification of the region and the exploitation, for 1941–1944 Current events German benefit, of its resources and people. Adolf Hitler issued a Führer Decree defining Random article the administration of the newly occupied Eastern territories on 17 July 1941.[1] Donate to Wikipedia Before the German invasion, Ukraine was a constituent republic of the USSR, inhabited by Ukrainians with Russian, Polish, Jewish, Belarusian, German, Roma and Crimean Tatar Interaction minorities. It was a key subject of Nazi planning for the post-war expansion of the German Flag Emblem state and civilization. Help About Wikipedia Contents Community portal 1 History Recent changes 2 Geography Contact Wikipedia 3 Administration 3.1 Political figures related with the German administration of Ukraine Toolbox 3.2 Military commanders linked with the German administration of Ukraine 3.3 Administrative divisions What links here 3.3.1 Further eastward expansion Capital Rowno (Rivne) Related changes 4 Demographics Upload file Languages German (official) 5 Security Ukrainian Special pages 6 Economic exploitation Polish · Crimean Tatar Permanent link 7 German intentions Government Civil administration Page information 8 See also Reichskommissar Data item 9 References - 1941–1944 Erich Koch Cite this page 10 Further reading Historical era World War II 11 External links - Established 1941 Print/export - Disestablished 1944 [edit] Create a book History Download as PDF Population This section requires expansion.
    [Show full text]
  • Ledger of Death
    Seton Hall University eRepository @ Seton Hall The Bridge: A Yearbook of Judaeo-Christian Studies, Vol. I The Institute of Judaeo-Christian Studies 1955 Ledger of Death William Keller Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.shu.edu/jcs-bridge-I Part of the Biblical Studies Commons, Christianity Commons, and the Jewish Studies Commons Recommended Citation William Keller, "Ledger of Death." In The Bridge: A Yearbook of Judaeo-Christian Studies, Vol. 1, edited by John M. Oesterreicher and Barry Ulanov, 283-291. New York: Pantheon Books, 1955. SURVEYS William Keller LEDGER OF DEATH NO HISTORICAL theory has ever received a more crushing refutation than the nineteenth-century view of continual progress. The widely held pre-1914 conviction that "we are too civilized to fight" was shown to be a fallacy in World War I. But who, in the wildest flights of fancy, could have foretold that this century would see a new age of persecu­ tion and massacre, on a scale undreamed of in centuries past, and rely­ ing on all the latest techniques of modern "civilization"? Yet such have been the facts: a whole people, the Jews, were regarded by the distorted, worse-than-pagan nationalism of the Nazis as alien, un­ cooperative, inferior, indeed scarcely human, and were marked down for total liquidation. Demented as such a scheme sounds, it was actually put into operation, and in large part succeeded. To write the full story of this terrifying nadir in human history would require many volumes, volumes which one day may be written. Nevertheless it is essential for all of us even now to realize at least the actual extent of this persecution.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction Norman J.W
    Introduction Norman J.W. Goda E The examination of legal proceedings related to Nazi Germany’s war and the Holocaust has expanded signifi cantly in the past two decades. It was not always so. Though the Trial of the Major War Criminals at Nuremberg in 1945–1946 generated signifi cant scholarly literature, most of it, at least in the trial’s immediate aftermath, concerned legal scholars’ judgments of the trial’s effi cacy from a strictly legalistic perspective. Was the four-power trial based on ex post facto law and thus problematic for that reason, or did it provide the best possible due process to the defendants under the circumstances?1 Cold War political wrangl ing over the subsequent Allied trials in the western German occupation zones as well as the sentences that they pronounced generated a discourse that was far more critical of the tri- als than laudatory.2 Historians, meanwhile, used the records assembled at Nuremberg as an entrée into other captured German records as they wrote initial studies of the Third Reich, these focusing mainly on foreign policy and wartime strategy, though also to some degree on the Final Solution to the Jewish Question.3 But they did not historicize the trial, nor any of subsequent trials, as such. Studies that analyzed the postwar proceedings in and of themselves from a historical perspective developed only three de- cades after Nuremberg, and they focused mainly on the origins of the initial, groundbreaking trial.4 Matters changed in the 1990s for a number of reasons. The fi rst was late- and post-Cold War interest among historians of Germany, and of other nations too, in Vergangenheitsbewältigung—the political, social, and intellectual attempt to confront, or to sidestep, the criminal wartime past.
    [Show full text]
  • Hungary and the Holocaust Confrontation with the Past
    UNITED STATES HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL MUSEUM CENTER FOR ADVANCED HOLOCAUST STUDIES Hungary and the Holocaust Confrontation with the Past Symposium Proceedings W A S H I N G T O N , D. C. Hungary and the Holocaust Confrontation with the Past Symposium Proceedings CENTER FOR ADVANCED HOLOCAUST STUDIES UNITED STATES HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL MUSEUM 2001 The assertions, opinions, and conclusions in this occasional paper are those of the authors. They do not necessarily reflect those of the United States Holocaust Memorial Council or of the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum. Third printing, March 2004 Copyright © 2001 by Rabbi Laszlo Berkowits, assigned to the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum; Copyright © 2001 by Randolph L. Braham, assigned to the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum; Copyright © 2001 by Tim Cole, assigned to the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum; Copyright © 2001 by István Deák, assigned to the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum; Copyright © 2001 by Eva Hevesi Ehrlich, assigned to the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum; Copyright © 2001 by Charles Fenyvesi; Copyright © 2001 by Paul Hanebrink, assigned to the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum; Copyright © 2001 by Albert Lichtmann, assigned to the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum; Copyright © 2001 by George S. Pick, assigned to the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum In Charles Fenyvesi's contribution “The World that Was Lost,” four stanzas from Czeslaw Milosz's poem “Dedication” are reprinted with the permission of the author. Contents
    [Show full text]
  • The Roosevelt Administration, David Ben-Gurion, and the Failure to Bomb Auschwitz: a Mystery Solved
    1 Rafael Medoff The Roosevelt Administration, David Ben-Gurion, and the Failure to Bomb Auschwitz: A Mystery Solved Executive Summary Since the early 1990s, defenders of President Franklin Roosevelt's response to the Holocaust have argued that the Roosevelt administration's failure to order the bombing of Auschwitz is mitigated by the fact that the leadership of the Jewish Agency for Palestine, including David Ben-Gurion, declared their opposition to bombing Auschwitz, at a meeting in Jerusalem on June 11, 1944. So why blame the Roosevelt administration, if Jewish leaders themselves did not want it bombed? But there was a mystery: a series of documents starting as early as June 30, 1944 show that other leaders of the Jewish Agency did ask Allied representatives to bomb the camp. How could they do so, given the declared opposition of the Agency's Executive? Yet there was no record of the Jewish Agency leadership reversing the position it took on June 11 against bombing--so do FDR's defenders have a legitimate point? This mystery has at last been solved. Newly-discovered documents, found in a Zionist archival collection that had been closed to the public for more than 25 years, demonstrate that the Jewish Agency leadership, including Ben-Gurion, did change its position, and that efforts by Jewish Agency officials and other Jewish leaders around the world to bring about the Allied bombing of Auschwitz were more extensive than previously realized. The Campaign to Absolve Roosevelt For the past fifteen years, the Franklin & Eleanor Roosevelt Institute and its supporters have been working assiduously to undermine the widespread perception that the United States could have, and should have, bombed the Auschwitz death camp or the railway lines leading to the camp.
    [Show full text]