DOCSLIB.ORG

NEW MALE STUDIES (NMS) PUBLISHING ~ MONOGRAPH: 148 Pages © 2016 AUSTRALIAN INSTITUTE of MALE HEALTH and STUDIES (AIMHS)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
NEW MALE STUDIES (NMS) PUBLISHING ~ MONOGRAPH: 148 Pages © 2016 AUSTRALIAN INSTITUTE of MALE HEALTH and STUDIES (AIMHS) i NEW MALE STUDIES (NMS) PUBLISHING ~ MONOGRAPH: 148 pages © 2016 AUSTRALIAN INSTITUTE OF MALE HEALTH AND STUDIES (AIMHS) ii SEX DIFFERENCE EXPLAINED From DNA to Society: Purging Gene Copy Errors Steve Moxon Broomhill Sheffield, UK NEW MALE STUDIES (NMS) PUBLISHING ~ MONOGRAPH: 148 pages © 2016 AUSTRALIAN INSTITUTE OF MALE HEALTH AND STUDIES (AIMHS) iii FOREWORD New Male Studies (NMS) Publishing inaugurates its monograph series with this essay by British independent researcher, Steve Moxon. It is in the interests of stimulating live- ly discussion that we present this very bold and lively text, which is, whatever may even- tually be the verdict about its conclusions, grounded in solid science. The Australian Institute of Men’s Health and Studies (AIMHS), which sponsors the journal and monograph series, has established a reputation for not holding back on grounds of perhaps offending political correctness. As in the articles published in our journal, here in Mr Moxon’s essay, some very strong views are offered. We leave it to the reader to take those views seriously and judge whether the science underlying them justifies Mr Moxon’s conclusions, and their implications for practice and policy-making. The Australian Institute of Men’s Health and Studies and New Male Studies (NMS) Publiushing are pleased to make this essay available. The views expressed by the author are not necessarily those of the editorial and supporting boards’ members. We would like to acknowledge the generous participation of an outside reader who raised im- portant questions for clarification of earlier drafts of the essay. Miles Groth Editor, New Male Studies (NMS) Publishing New York, NY November 2016 NEW MALE STUDIES (NMS) PUBLISHING ~ MONOGRAPH: 148 pages © 2016 AUSTRALIAN INSTITUTE OF MALE HEALTH AND STUDIES (AIMHS) iv TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD ............................................................................................................................ III TABLE OF CONTENTS .............................................................................................................. IV AUTHOR PROFILE .................................................................................................................. VII INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................... VIII SETTING THE SCENE ................................................................................................................ 1 EXTREME IDEOLOGY AND THE SCIENTIFIC DEATH OF 'SOCIAL CONDITIONING' ......................................... 1 SECTION 1 ............................................................................................................................... 5 WHY WE CAN'T 'TRANSCEND' OUR GENETICALLY-BASED SELVES ........................................................... 5 SECTION 2 ............................................................................................................................. 11 CAUSATION IS UPWARDS: WHAT'S 'DOWNWARDS' IS JUST FEEDBACK ................................................... 11 SECTION 3 ............................................................................................................................. 16 THE CORE BIOLOGICAL PRINCIPLE THAT DEALS WITH GENE COPYING MISTAKES ..................................... 16 SECTION 4 ............................................................................................................................. 19 SEX IS PURGING FAULTY GENES BY A DIFFERENT MATING TYPE ........................................................... 19 SECTION 5 ............................................................................................................................. 22 BOTH SEXES INVEST IN REPRODUCTION: FEMALES AFTER SEX, MALES BEFORE ....................................... 22 SECTION 6 ............................................................................................................................. 25 THE KEY MALE 'GENETIC FILTER' MECHANISM: DOMINANCE HIERARCHY.............................................. 25 SECTION 7 ............................................................................................................................. 29 HIERARCHY PROPER IS ONLY EVER AMONGST MALES ........................................................................ 29 SECTION 8 ............................................................................................................................. 35 'POLICING' MALES THROUGH PREJUDICE ......................................................................................... 35 SECTION 9 ............................................................................................................................. 42 A SEX-SPECIFIC STRESS MECHANISM UNDERPINS THE MALE DOMINANCE CONTEST ................................ 42 NEW MALE STUDIES (NMS) PUBLISHING ~ MONOGRAPH: 148 pages © 2016 AUSTRALIAN INSTITUTE OF MALE HEALTH AND STUDIES (AIMHS) v SECTION 10 ........................................................................................................................... 47 HIERARCHY IS CENTRAL TO MALES FROM EARLIEST DEVELOPMENT ...................................................... 47 SECTION 11 ........................................................................................................................... 50 BOYS / MEN GROUP ALL-INCLUSIVELY BEYOND THEIR HIERARCHY ....................................................... 50 SECTION 12 ........................................................................................................................... 53 HOW WOMEN'S SOCIALITY ARISES FROM MEN'S: WOMEN 'MARRY OUT' ............................................. 53 SECTION 13 ........................................................................................................................... 60 THE 'QUEEN BEE' IS THE RAINY-DAY DEFAULT SOLE BREEDER ............................................................. 60 SECTION 14 ........................................................................................................................... 64 PAIR-BONDING SERVES WOMEN, BUT NOT THROUGH MEN BEING PROVIDERS ...................................... 64 SECTION 15 ........................................................................................................................... 67 MEN'S 'MATE-GUARDING' IS NOT WHAT IT SEEMS ........................................................................... 67 SECTION 16 ........................................................................................................................... 73 WOMEN VALUE PAIR-BONDING MORE THAN MEN DO ...................................................................... 73 SECTION 17 ........................................................................................................................... 76 WOMEN ARE MUCH THE MORE VIOLENT TO THEIR PARTNERS ............................................................. 76 SECTION 18 ........................................................................................................................... 81 IN 'TRADITIONAL' SOCIETIES, WOMEN VIE TO 'HONESTLY SIGNAL' FIDELITY ........................................... 81 SECTION 19 ........................................................................................................................... 87 THE FEMALE WITHIN THE MALE SOCIAL STRUCTURE ......................................................................... 87 SECTION 20 ........................................................................................................................... 92 WOMEN RISE BY BEING MORE CONSCIENTIOUS ............................................................................... 92 SECTION 21 ........................................................................................................................... 96 MEN REALLY ARE MORE COMPETITIVE; WOMEN BACK AWAY ............................................................. 96 SECTION 22 ......................................................................................................................... 101 CROSS-SEX, IT’S SEXUAL DISPLAY, NOT CONTEST: MEN ACT, WOMEN FLAUNT .................................... 101 SECTION 23 ......................................................................................................................... 105 NEW MALE STUDIES (NMS) PUBLISHING ~ MONOGRAPH: 148 pages © 2016 AUSTRALIAN INSTITUTE OF MALE HEALTH AND STUDIES (AIMHS) vi THE MYTH OF 'SEXUAL CONFLICT': IT'S ACTUALLY A WITHIN-SEX PHENOMENON ................................. 105 SECTION 24 ......................................................................................................................... 110 CODA: THE SYMBOSIS OF THE SEXES ............................................................................................ 110 REFERENCES ........................................................................................................................ 111 NOTES PAGES ...................................................................................................................... 134 NOTES PAGES ...................................................................................................................... 135 NOTES PAGES ...................................................................................................................... 136 NOTES PAGES .....................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Brain, Psyche, and Self: a Dialectic Between Analytical Psychology and Neuroscience
    BRAIN, PSYCHE, AND SELF: A DIALECTIC BETWEEN ANALYTICAL PSYCHOLOGY AND NEUROSCIENCE A dissertation submitted by KESSTAN C. BLANDIN to PACIFICA GRADUATE INSTITUTE in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in DEPTH PSYCHOLOGY This dissertation has been accepted for the faculty of Pacifica Graduate Institute by: •ennis P. Slattery, Chair Jennifer L.~Selig, Reader (/tyjz Susan E. Mehrtens, PhD External Reader UMI Number: 3519792 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. DiygrMution UMI 3519792 Published by ProQuest LLC 2012. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 ii JANUARY 25, 2011 Copyright by KESSTAN C. BLANDIN 2011 iii ABSTRACT Brain, Psyche, and Self: A Dialectic Between Analytical Psychology and Neuroscience by Kesstan Blandin Although much of C. G. Jung's work is not compatible with neuroscientific methods or perspectives, his ideas on the structure of the psyche and self overlap with attempts to understand the phenomenon of a self in consciousness through mapping correlates with brain functions and processes. They are therefore appropriate to engage in dialogue with neuroscience. Through these dialogues we can further understand the construction of the self and identity in light of current findings in neuroscience and the theories of C.
    [Show full text]
  • Do Parents Matter? Judith Rich Harris and Child Development by Malcolm Gladwell
    August 17, 1998 The New Yorker ANNALS OF BEHAVIOR Do Parents Matter? Judith Rich Harris and child development by Malcolm Gladwell 1. The idea that will make Judith Rich Harris famous came to her, unbidden, on the afternoon of January 20, 1994. At the time, Harris was a textbook writer, with no doctorate or academic affiliation, working from her home in suburban New Jersey. Because of a lupus-like illness, she doesn’t have the strength to leave the house, and she’d spent that morning in bed. By early afternoon, though, she was at her desk, glancing through a paper by a prominent psychologist about juvenile delinquency, and for some reason a couple of unremarkable sentences struck her as odd: “Delinquency must be a social behavior that allows access to some desirable resource. I suggest that the resource is mature status, with its consequent power and privilege.” It is an observation consistent with our ideas about what it means to grow up. Teen-agers rebel against being teen-agers, against the restrictions imposed on them by adults. They smoke because only adults are supposed to smoke. They steal cars because they are too young to have cars. But Harris was suddenly convinced that the paper had it backward. “Adolescents aren’t trying to be like adults--they are trying to contrast themselves with adults,” she explains. “And it was as if a light had gone on in the sky. It was one of the most exciting things that have ever happened to me. In a minute or two, I had the germ of the theory, and in ten minutes I had enough of it to see that it was important.” If adolescents didn’t want to be like adults, it was because they wanted to be like other adolescents.
    [Show full text]
  • Barnes Et Al
    DEMONSTRATING THE VALIDITY OF TWIN RESEARCH IN CRIMINOLOGY∗ J. C. BARNES,1 JOHN PAUL WRIGHT,1,6 BRIAN B. BOUTWELL,2 JOSEPH A. SCHWARTZ,3 ERIC J. CONNOLLY,4 JOSEPH L. NEDELEC,1 and KEVIN M. BEAVER5,6 1School of Criminal Justice, University of Cincinnati 2School of Social Work, Saint Louis University 3School of Criminology and Criminal Justice, University of Nebraska at Omaha 4Criminal Justice Department, Pennsylvania State University, Abington 5College of Criminology and Criminal Justice, Florida State University 6Center for Social and Humanities Research, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia KEYWORDS: assumptions, behavior genetics, biosocial, empirical, quantitative, twins In a recent article published in Criminology, Burt and Simons (2014) claimed that the statistical violations of the classical twin design render heritability studies useless. Claiming quantitative genetics is “fatally flawed” and describing the results generated from these models as “preposterous,” Burt and Simons took the unprecedented step to call for abandoning heritability studies and their constituent findings. We show that their call for an “end to heritability studies” was premature, misleading, and entirely without merit. Specifically, we trace the history of behavioral genetics and show that 1) the Burt and Simons critique dates back 40 years and has been subject to a broad array of empirical investigations, 2) the violation of assumptions in twin models does not in- validate their results, and 3) Burt and Simons created a distorted and highly misleading portrait of behavioral genetics and those who use quantitative genetic approaches. “The flaws of twin studies are not fatal, but rather seem no worse (and may be better) than the flaws of the typical causal study that relies on observational data.” (Felson, 2012: ii) Behavioral genetic research has existed for more than 100 years (Maxson, 2007).
    [Show full text]
  • CHILDREN DON't DO THINGS HALF WAY a Conversation with Judith Rich Harris [June 1999]
    Summer Reading from the Archive CHILDREN DON'T DO THINGS HALF WAY A Conversation with Judith Rich Harris [June 1999] I'm prone to making statements like this one: how the parents rear the child has no long-term effects on the child's personality, intelligence, or mental health. I guess you could call that an extreme statement. But I prefer to think of myself as a defender of the null hypothesis. Introduction It was in the 1990s that I received a phone call from Steven Pinker who wanted to make the world aware of the work of Judith Rich Harris, an unheralded psychologist who was advocating a revolutionary idea which she discussed in her 1999 Edge interview, "Children don't do things half way: children don’t compromise," in which she said, "how the parents rear the child has no long-term effects on the child's personality, intelligence, or mental health." 1 From the very early days of Edge, Harris was the gift that kept giving. Beginning in 1998, with her response to "What Questions Are You Asking Yourself?" through "The Last Question" in 2016, she exemplified the role of the Third Culture intellectual: "those scientists and other thinkers in the empirical world who, through their work and expository writing, are taking the place of the traditional intellectual in rendering visible the deeper meanings of our lives, redefining who and what we are." Her subsequent Edge essays over the years focused on subjects as varied as natural selection, parenting styles, the effect of genes on human behavior, twin studies, the survival of friendship, beauty as truth, among others are evidence of a keen intellect and a fearless thinker determined to advance science-based thinking as well as her own controversial ideas.
    [Show full text]
  • Do Parents Make a Difference in Children's Character Development?
    DO PARENTS MAKE A DIFFERENCE IN CHILDREN’S CHARACTER DEVELOPMENT? WHAT THE RESEARCH SHOWS Tom Lickona Center for the 4th and 5th Rs SUNY Cortland Fourth Annual Fall Character Education Seminar November 20, 1998 In its August 24, 1998 issue, Newsweek magazine devoted its cover story to a controversial new book, The Nurture Assumption: Why Children Turn Out the Way They Do by Judith Rich Harris. Ms. Harris does not claim to be a psychologist or expert in child development; she is a textbook writer. Nevertheless, she puts forth a startling thesis: Parents do not have much effect on how kids turn out. How kids turn out, Harris says, is mostly the result of genes and peers. Of course, we all know that heredity and peers play a part in kids' development. But is it true, as Harris says, that parents have little influence? If it's true that parents have little influence on their children, that's very bad news for schools, for schools would logically have even less influence. I'd like to argue that Harris is wrong and common sense is right: Parents do matter. Studies of childrearing reveal many things effective parents do that make a major impact on their children and especially on their character development. We should know this body of evidence for at least two reasons. First, so we can counter Harris's claim and communicate to parents what the research really shows, thereby bolstering their confidence that they do make a difference. A second reason is that good schools are like good families.
    [Show full text]
  • Concepts and Implications of Altruism Bias and Pathological Altruism
    Concepts and implications of altruism bias and pathological altruism Barbara A. Oakley1 Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Oakland University, Rochester, MI 48309 Edited by John C. Avise, University of California, Irvine, CA, and approved April 9, 2013 (received for review February 14, 2013) The profound benefits of altruism in modern society are self-evident. Pathological altruism can be conceived as behavior in which However, the potential hurtful aspects of altruism have gone largely attempts to promote the welfare of another, or others, results unrecognized in scientific inquiry. This is despite the fact that instead in harm that an external observer would conclude was virtually all forms of altruism are associated with tradeoffs—some reasonably foreseeable. More precisely, this paper defines path- of enormous importance and sensitivity—and notwithstanding that ological altruism as an observable behavior or personal tendency examples of pathologies of altruism abound. Presented here are the in which the explicit or implicit subjective motivation is in- mechanistic bases and potential ramifications of pathological altru- tentionally to promote the welfare of another, but instead of ism, that is, altruism in which attempts to promote the welfare of overall beneficial outcomes the altruism instead has unreasonable others instead result in unanticipated harm. A basic conceptual ap- (from the relative perspective of an outside observer) negative proach toward the quantification of altruism bias is presented. consequences to the other or even to the self. This definition does Guardian systems and their over arching importance in the evolution not suggest that there are absolutes but instead suggests that, of cooperation are also discussed.
    [Show full text]
  • Psychology Times, Fall 2007
    FALL 2007 D E P A R T M E N T O F P SYCHO L OGY | UNIVERSITY O F Ill I N O I S A T U R B A N A - C H A MP A I G N FOCUS ON RESEA R CH The Legacy of Early Experience: Prospective and Psychological Retrospective Evidence for Enduring Effects Models of Language By Glenn I. Roisman Comprehension By Kara Federmeier One of the more Ironically, debates about the developmental controversial claims significance of early experience have, until Human brains are storehouses for vast in developmental recently, taken place in the relative absence amounts of information about things, psychology is that of much data from long-term, longitudinal people, places, and events. Remarkably, in early experiences studies, tracking cohorts of children from only hundreds of milliseconds the brain with caregivers leave infancy to maturity, that have used state- of an experienced language user can an enduring mark on of-the-art methods for studying the quality retrieve information from this storehouse in human development. of interpersonal relationships in the early response to a complex, often ambiguous, Although this is a very old idea, formalized in life course. Fortunately for me, it was as a perceptual signal—that is, a visual or theories that date back to the beginnings of graduate research assistant on one of the auditory word. Research conducted in the psychological science, no strong consensus few such investigations—Alan Sroufe, Byron University of Illinois Cognition and Brain has been built within the field or in society Egeland, and Andy at large about this issue.
    [Show full text]
  • How to Succeed in Childhood
    How to Succeed in Childhood by Judith Rich Harris very day, tell your children bad for kids. In those days, spanking was that you love them. Hug considered not just the parents’ right but them at least once every 24 their duty. hours. Never hit them. If they Partly as a result of the major retoolings Edo something wrong, don’t say, “You’re in the advice industry, child-rearing styles bad!” Say, “What you did was bad.” No, have changed drastically over the course of wait—even that might be too harsh. Say, this century. Although abusive parents instead, “What you did made me unhap- have always existed, run-of-the-mill par- py.” ents—the large majority of the popula- The people who are in the business of tion—administer more hugs and fewer giving out this sort of advice are very angry spankings than they used to. at me, and with good reason. I’m the Now ask yourself this: Are children turn- author of The Nurture Assumption—the ing out better? Are they happier and better book that allegedly claims that “parents adjusted than they were in the earlier part don’t matter.” Though that’s not what the of the century? Less aggressive? Less anx- book actually says, the advice givers are ious? Nicer? nonetheless justified in their anger. I don’t pull punches, and I’m not impressed by ² their air of benevolent omniscience. Their advice is based not on scientific evidence It was Sigmund Freud who gave us the but on prevailing cultural myths.
    [Show full text]
  • TORT LIABILITY in the AGE of the HELICOPTER PARENT Elizabeth G. Porter∗ Discussions of Parental Liability by Courts and Legal
    3 PORTER 533 – 587 (DO NOT DELETE) 2/1/2013 12:26 PM TORT LIABILITY IN THE AGE OF THE HELICOPTER PARENT Elizabeth G. Porter∗ ABSTRACT Discussions of parental liability by courts and legal scholars are often tinged with fear: fear that government interference will chill parental autonomy; fear that parents will be held liable for their children’s every misdeed; and, recently, fear that a new generation of so-called “helicopter parents” who hover over their children’s every move will establish unrealistically high legal standards for parenting. However, in the context of common law suits against parents, these fears are misguided. To the contrary, courts have consistently shielded wealthier parents—those most likely to be defendants in civil suits—from exposure to liability for conduct related to their parenting practices. This Article critically examines the common law of parental (non-) liability, both historically and in light of current cultural trends. Parental liability takes two forms: liability for parents’ harm to their children, and liability of parents for harms caused to others by their children. Individually these subjects have received remarkably little scholarly attention; together they have received none. Yet both types of parental liability are central to ongoing cultural debates about parenting, as well as to current controversies about the role of courts in establishing legal duty. A thorough reconsideration of parental liability is particularly timely in light of the new Restatement (Third) of Torts, which speaks directly to issues that are central to both forms of parental liability. This Article concludes that courts should hold parents to a standard of reasonable care.
    [Show full text]
  • Richard Lynn Maps World
    03/10/12 Gene Expression: A World of Dif f erence: Richard Ly nn Maps World Intelligence Front page Wednesday, February 01, 2006 Open Thread A World of Difference: Richard Lynn Maps World Contact Authors GNXP forum Intelligence posted by Jason Malloy @ 2/01/2006 07:12:00 PM Shortcuts: Discover GNXP Archives A review of Richard Lynn's Race Differences in Intelligence: Interview s An Evolutionary Analysis Blogroll (Click here for summary chart. Warning: 20 page review.) Principles of Population Genetics Genetics of Populations The generally listed "peak" age for scientific creativity and Molecular Evolution productivity is around the surprisingly young age range of 30-40, Quantitative Genetics but the same exact age doesn't apply to all scientific disciplines. Evolutionary Quantitative Genetics The peak in fields that demand greater doses of pure reasoning, Evolutionary Genetics such as mathematics, theoretical physics, and molecular Evolution biology, appears to be somewhere in the twenties. So, for Molecular Markers, Natural History, and Evolution instance, James Watson discovered the double helix at 25 and The Genetics of Human Populations Genetics and Analysis of Quantitative Traits then dropped off the radar as anything but a nerd celebrity. In Epistasis and Evolutionary Process contrast are fields such as evolutionary biology, where years of Evolutionary Human Genetics collecting and assimilating large amounts of data can be required Biometry for original analysis. So, for example, Charles Darwin was 50 Mathematical Models in Biology years old when he published his landmark The Origin of Species, Speciation not to mention 62 for The Descent of Man and 63 for The Evolutionary Genetics: Case Studies and Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animals.
    [Show full text]
  • Perceived Sibling Compatibiltiy and the Effects of Personality
    PERCEIVED SIBLING COMPATIBILTIY AND THE EFFECTS OF PERSONALITY by CHERYL WARREN NEALE (Under the Direction of Charles F. Halverson) ABSTRACT This exploratory study examined perceived sibling compatibility and the effects of personality factors on 134 sibling pairs of older adolescents. The sibling pairs completed an Internet-based survey with a demographic questionnaire and two measures. The Lifespan Sibling Relationship Scale (LSRS; Riggio, 2000) measured perceived sibling compatibility, and the Inventory of Children’s Individual Differences (ICID; Halverson & Havill, et al., 2003) measured personality structure. Results showed that high compatibility sibling pairs were more likely to share in the same levels of certain personality factors and that Agreeableness was most important when predicting perceived sibling compatibility. INDEX WORDS: Sibling relationships, Siblings, Compatibility, Personality PERCEIVED SIBLING COMPATIBILITY AND THE EFFECTS OF PERSONALITY by CHERYL WARREN NEALE B.S., James Madison University, 2000 A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of The University of Georgia in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree MASTER OF SCIENCE ATHENS, GEORGIA 2003 © 2003 Cheryl Warren Neale All Rights Reserved PERCEIVED SIBLING COMPATIBILITY AND THE EFFECTS OF PERSONALITY by CHERYL WARREN NEALE Major Professor: Charles F. Halverson Committee: Valerie Havill Zolinda Stoneman Electronic Version Approved: Maureen Grasso Dean of the Graduate School The University of Georgia December 2003 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would first like to thank my professors for all of their assistance and support throughout this entire paper and process; Charles F. Halverson, Valerie Havill, Zolinda Stoneman, and Lynda Walters, I could not have done this without all of you. I think of all of you as mentors and I respect and admire you and your work a great deal.
    [Show full text]
  • Bonjasky to Have Full Fight Camp Following New Year's
    BONJASKY TO HAVE FULL FIGHT CAMP FOLLOWING NEW YEAR’S EVE TOURNAMENT PARTICIPATION London, England (Nov. 23, 2012) – The highly-anticipated showdown between Remy Bonjasky (76-14, 40 KO’s) and Tyrone Spong (68-6-1 42 KO’s) will take place on Saturday, March 23 at the Excel Arena in London, England, it was announced today by Glory Sports International (GSI), parent company of the Glory World Series. The bout had previously been set for February 16 but with Bonjasky being set to participate in the GLORY 4 – TOKYO: GRAND SLAM 16-man mega-tournament on New Year’s Eve, it was decided that February would potentially be too soon for him to get back in the ring. He will now have several more weeks to recover from his tournament bouts and get in peak condition for his first-time meeting with Spong. “Remy was more than happy to take part in the tournament and then fight again in February,” explains GLORY Chairman Pierre Andurand. “But this is the first time that he and Spong will have fought and there was such huge interest in the match when we announced it that we decided to move the date and give him some time to rest up. It means that he and Spong will be in peak condition when they face each other.” Marcus Luer, Managing Director of GLORY, added, “The worldwide interest in Spong vs. Bonjasky has been absolutely huge. Within literally minutes of it being announced we were inundated with requests for tickets and broadcast details. “With this fight being of such magnitude to fans worldwide, we want both fighters to be at their absolute best for this historic first meeting.
    [Show full text]