The Linacre Quarterly

Volume 32 | Number 3 Article 12

August 1965 Current Medical-Moral Comment Thomas J. O'Donnell

Follow this and additional works at: http://epublications.marquette.edu/lnq

Recommended Citation O'Donnell, Thomas J. (1965) "Current Medical-Moral Comment," The Linacre Quarterly: Vol. 32 : No. 3 , Article 12. Available at: http://epublications.marquette.edu/lnq/vol32/iss3/12 Stephen by the children because he almost two years apar 1ite a feat evened the score at five boys and in our family! CURRENT five girls . . . ( we will uneven the Did I mention fulfi; nt? I am a score about July 23). But I stopped Medical-Moral woman truly fulfilled �n I nurse nursing at 15 months because I was my baby. I am clos, God as I pregnant. Our other babies have nurse my child. COMMENT* been born fairly close together, from 11 to 16 months apart. I nursed Our Lord feeds me · His body. THOMAS J. O'DONNELL, S.J.** them a much shorter time, usually His eternal gift of JVe comes from three to six months. Baby #11 especially when I =ive Holy The most recent and depressing came almost anachronistic. Within will arrive about 22 months after Communion. dimension of the materialistic mind the last decade the Margaret Hague Stephen. Obviously, nursing did not I feed my child v. my body. is manifested in the relatively new Maternity Hospital in Jersey City, suppress ovulation completely, but at My eternal gift of 10\ nd security and current pressure for the "easy New Jersey reported a ratio of less least nursing spaced these two babies is given especially wh I nurse. way out" approach to legalized than one therapeutic in abortion. every sixteen thousand obstetrical admissions; and in August 1953 Roy The presently growing campaign Heffernan, M.D. and W i 11 i a 111 to relax the abortion laws in the Lynch, M.D. published the results various jurisdictions is a strange of their study of three million de­ outgrowth of the h i s t o r y of liveries in The A.merican Journal of therapeutic abortion in American Obstetrics and Gynecology. [cf. also, medicine. Linacre Quarterly, Feb. 1952, "Is Therapeutic Abortion Scientifically Fifty years ago there was a long Justified?", Heffernan and Lynch.] list of so-called "medical ind:ca- They concluded that the approach tions" for therapeutic abortion: to therapeutic abortion had been Complications of p r e g n a n c y in . woefully unscientific in many areas, which termination of fetal life was had been in direct violation of the .viewed by many as the only practi­ . fundamental life-saving ideals and cal approach to protecting the life traditions of the medical profession of the expectant mother. While the and that in fact the maternal death civil law of most jurisdictions con - rates in hospitals performing thera­ tinued to restrict legal abortion to peutic are slightly higher these extreme circumstances, the than in those hosp ita 1 s where twentieth century advance of mEdi­ no therapeutic abortions were cine and obstetric technique con­ performed.1 tinued to reduce the number of "medical indications" for therapeu­ Meanwhile, in 1946, in an attempt tic abortion until the procedure be- to eliminate criminal and septic abortion, had greatly broad­ •By arrangement with the editor of ened its grounds for legal abortion Georgetown Medical Bulletin, Father and by 1951 the legal abortion rate O'Donnell's column in that journal ap­ pears concurrently in THE LINACRE QUARTERLY !Heffernan, R. and Lynch, W.: What is the state of therapeutic abortion in mod­ .. Professorial Lecturer - Medical Ethics, ern obstetrics? Am. J. Obst. & Gynec., Geogetown Medical School. 66: 2, August, 1953. Aucun, 1965 235 234 LJNACRE QUARTERLY patients mother nor the life of the child can had reached 57.4 per 1,000 live tion will grow within coming - and he should not feel 1 be directly and purposefully termi­ births, with no evidence of a months. The most usua -1.son that free to kill either one of them for nated - neither in the interest of decrease in criminal abortions.2 will be given will be tl abortion any reason. s maternal health nor for reasons of are being done in good , 1 ical prac- Then, in 1955, Soviet Russia legal­ One other important observation fetal euthanasia. But in many other tice for psychiatric reasc or in the ized abortion at the mere request of is in order here. Error has a way hospitals the life of the child is not presence of possible co romise of the pregnant_ mother as well as for of twisting the truth to conceal its so protected, and can be simply ter­ the fetus, and in cases and very broad sociological indications. own tracks. It has often been said minated under certain circumstances. incest, as well as for c r broadly Most of the Iron Curtain countries that in a Catholic hospital the life But from this it is not quite valid to interpreted therapeutic lications. quickly followed suit. By 1959 legal of the child must be preferred to conclude that in a Catholic hospital abortion had risen to one tenth the But do the facts fit 1e theory? that of the mother. This error per­ the life of the child is to be preferred number of live births in Poland, and Is it possible that such Jestructive sists, even though Pope Pius XII to that of the mother. Rather it is �o one third the number of live attitude toward inno, ,t human explicitly stated, as recently as 1951, true that in a Catholic hospital "Never and in no· one case has the births in both Bulgaria and Czecho­ life, as an easy way c of pote n­ neither patient is to be killed, and slovakia. In Hungary, the number tially difficult problen is really Church taught that the life of the every effort is to be made to save of abortions exceeded the number of consistent with the i tis of the child is to be preferred to that of both. 7 live births.3 medical profession? Fe ,xample, it the mother." It is a distortion of emphasis that keeps the error viable. is well known that m v obstetri­ 7Pope Pius XII: Address to The National Finally, in 1959, The American The simple fact is that in a Cath­ cians still consider n ;la in the Congress of Family Front, November, Law Institute included a section in olic hospital neither the life of the 1951. its Moral Penal Code which would first trimester as a com ,nly recog­ nized excuse for te, ·nation of dra_matically expand the legal indi­ cat10ns for abortion in the United . Yet in 19K ,mdstrom's States so as to include "substantial study of well over a tl ,sand cases risk to the mental health of the of rubella during pregr i cy demon­ y mother or that the child would be strated that, quite ap. from an as born with grave physical or mental moral consideration, 0rtion w of 1lefect, · or the pregnancy resulted not justified in such ca , in view dal defects from rape ... or from incest ... "4 the low incidence of and the mild nature o, ,rnny which This type of bill is soon to be did occur.6 And, indec:. other simi- 'Jresented to various State legisla­ lar studies and conclu, ,ns have not tures. A movement in this direction been wanting in litera ,re. was begun in Kansas in 1963 and was defeated. Most recently the An unborn baby a hu man with pressure is on in New York State.a being, a fellow man , .. dowed The pressure to m o d i f y a n d those inalienable rig; o1:; - to life, broaden the norms for legal abor- liberty, and the pursui. af happiness, which are not only drvine law but 2Aren, P.: Legal abortion in Sweden. Acta likewise the foundai 10ns of our Ob. et Gyn. Scandinavica, 37: suppl. I American democracv. The moral 1958. dimension is easily d(,cunible in the 3Tietze, C. and Lehfeld, H.: Legal abortion best traditions of the medical pro­ in eastern Europe.J.A.M.A., 175: 13, April fession: in an indiv,d.ial case the !, 1961. obstetrician has, not one, but two 4Section 207.11 6Newsfront. Modern Medicine, February 6Lundstrom, R.: Rubella

----·