Toshisada Nishida (1941–2011): Chimpanzee Rapport

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Toshisada Nishida (1941–2011): Chimpanzee Rapport Obituary Toshisada Nishida (1941–2011): Chimpanzee Rapport Frans B. M. de Waal* Living Links, Yerkes National Primate Research Center, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America ‘‘Chimpanzees are always new to me.’’ Toshisada Nishida [1] One of the absolute greats of primatol- ogy, Toshisada Nishida (March 3, 1941– June 7, 2011), recently passed away at the age of 70 (Figure 1). We have come such a long way in our knowledge of chimpan- zees, and the discoveries have reached us in such a gradual and cumulative fashion, that it is easy to forget how little was known when Nishida set out for Africa to establish one of the first chimpanzee field sites, in 1965. At the time, chimpanzees did not yet occupy the special place in our thinking about human evolution reserved for them today. Science considered ba- boons the best model of human evolution, since baboons had descended from the trees to become savanna-dwellers, like our ancestors. These rambunctious monkeys, however, are genetically more distant from us, and many of the characteristics deemed important for human evolution Figure 1. Toshisada Nishida in a Kyoto temple, in 2007. Photograph by Frans de Waal. are either absent or minimally developed, doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001185.g001 such as tool technology, cooperative hunt- ing, food sharing, territoriality, cultural patiently for chimpanzees at a patch of any need for social bonds—not unlike traditions, and certain cognitive capacities, sugar cane planted to attract them. The Rousseau’s noble savages—Nishida had such as planning and theory-of-mind. primates started to make regular visits only noticed that chimpanzees live a communal Chimpanzees show all of them. after about six months. Based on his field life with territorial boundaries and perhaps Early primatologists had seen chimpan- observations, Nishida defended his disser- even hostility between neighboring unit- zees travel through the trees, eating fruits tation at Kyoto University in 1968. He groups. This was not an easy discovery, at their leisure, but rarely noticed anything occupied a teaching position at Tokyo because chimpanzees are often encoun- of interest in their behavior. This was University, from 1969 until 1988, before tered alone or in small groups in the forest. partly due to low visibility and the apes’ he became Full Professor in the Zoology One can determine community relations wariness of people. The study of chim- Department of Kyoto University from only if one recognizes all individuals and panzee behavior in nature began in 1988 until 2004. After his retirement from keeps careful track of their travels. Nishi- earnest only in the 1960s with one field this position, he became Director of the da’s discovery upset not only Western site set up by Jane Goodall in Gombe Japan Monkey Center. notions of chimpanzees as individualists, Stream, and another one 120 km to the One of Nishida’s first discoveries was but also the expectations of his Japanese south by Japanese scientists led by truly groundbreaking. While science still mentors who thought chimpanzees would Nishida. Both teams were in it for the described the chimpanzee as a peaceful live, like humans, in nuclear family–like long haul rather than the brief expeditions arrangements. Debate about what to others had previously undertaken. vegetarian that roamed the forest without Nishida started his career inspired by the legendary father of Japanese primatol- Citation: de Waal FBM (2011) Toshisada Nishida (1941–2011): Chimpanzee Rapport. PLoS Biol 9(10): e1001185. ogy, Kinji Imanishi, at Kyoto University. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001185 As a graduate student of Imanishi’s Published October 25, 2011 successor, Junichiro Itani, Nishida first Copyright: ß 2011 Frans B. M. de Waal. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the studied Japanese macaques before he Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any traveled to Tanzania. He chose a forest medium, provided the original author and source are credited. in the foothills of the Mahale Mountains, Competing Interests: The author has declared that no competing interests exist. at Lake Tanganyika, where he waited * E-mail: [email protected] PLoS Biology | www.plosbiology.org 1 October 2011 | Volume 9 | Issue 10 | e1001185 expect must have been heated, because Mahale ended in 1982, aggressive behav- discovered that wild chimpanzees con- when Nishida’s teacher Itani arrived in ior of the chimpanzees towards neighbors sume Aspilia leaves. These leaves have no Kigoma, the student couldn’t wait for their hardly changed. Moreover, violent behav- known nutritional value, and are in fact physical reunion to shout from aboard the ior has also been reported from field sites not digested. The chimpanzees consume steamship Liemba: ‘‘There is no familoid where researchers never provisioned chim- them very slowly, mostly in the morning, in the chimpanzee society.’’ Itani-sensei panzees. For this reason, there is little swallowing the leaves without chewing. shouted back, ‘‘That can’t be true!’’ doubt among experts that chimpanzee Together with Richard Wrangham, the We have learned much about chimpan- males are naturally violent [2]. first Western primatologist to set foot in zees since then, such as that they hunt and A true pioneer of chimpanzee field Mahale, in 1971, Nishida published his eat meat, that they raid neighboring research, Nishida inspired many students, observations of potentially medicinal use territories, that they have complex tool collaborated with numerous international of plants by wild chimpanzees, thus skills that differ from group to group, that colleagues, and left one of the most founding the new field of zoopharmacognosy they medicate themselves with plants, that impressive publication records of any (i.e., self-medication by animals ingesting males engage in power politics while primatologist (a complete list can be found plants, insects, or soils) [7]. competing over status and females, and in [3]). Nishida was a most dedicated Another important moment in primatolo- so on. The list of discoveries is impressive scientist who in his early career spent gy occurred when William McGrew and and the Mahale field site has been central years, and later many months per year, Caroline Tutin visited Mahale in 1975. in furnishing the evidence. From the start, under relatively primitive circumstances, Extensively familiar with the chimpanzees the approach followed at Mahale has been without tap water or electricity, at Kasoje, in Gombe National Park, they had no reason that of Imanishi, who urged his students to at the foot of the mountains. As a result, he to expect striking behavioral differences in the identify individuals, give them names, and knew all chimpanzees in several groups, same subspecies with the same ecology. follow them over time. Not just for weeks and by ‘‘knowing’’, I mean that he Nevertheless, the Mahale chimpanzees fre- or months, as done previously, but for observed them as infants, saw them grow quently engaged in hand-clasp grooming, years and years, so that one could up as juveniles, and followed them whereas this behavior is entirely unknown understand the kinship relations within through their prime into old age. from Gombe. One chimpanzee takes the the community. With a species that breeds In 1982, at the same time that I wrote hand of another, which they then lift above as slowly and is as long-lived as the Chimpanzee Politics [4], Nishida and his their heads, while both groom each other’s chimpanzee, one needs to follow individ- students were documenting very similar armpits with their free hands. Based on their uals for a long time indeed to know power struggles among wild chimpanzees visit, McGrew and Tutin were the first to whether or not two adult males are [5,6], including one by a male named seriously question the assumption of ‘‘typical’’ brothers or how many offspring a female Kalunde. Kalunde played a game that chimpanzee behavior, an important step rears during her lifetime. Before scientists Nishida called ‘‘allegiance-fickleness,’’ which towards culture studies on the great apes [8]. learned to analyze DNA from fecal or hair allows over-the-hill males to carve out a key Nishida fostered many such contacts, samples, the only way to determine position by regularly switching sides in and was central in bringing Japanese kinship relations was to hunker down for alliances with younger adult males. It was a primatology and Western scientists togeth- the long term. thrill for me to meet Kalunde on a visit to the er. He stimulated his students and col- At the time, habituation of chimpanzees Mahale Mountains, and see Nishida in leagues to write in English, and was was typically done by means of food action. Nishida lived up to his reputation in himself the first Japanese primatologist to provisioning. Nishida first tried sugarcane, the field, being incredibly knowledgeable not publish an entire article in this language. until he found that bananas worked better. only about the primates he studied, but about He was first author or editor on no less He developed a ‘‘mobile provisioning’’ the forest as a whole and all of the flora and than 17 books and volumes, mostly in technique, in which scientists announced fauna therein. Not satisfied with bookish Japanese, but the last two in English. His their presence to distant chimpanzees by knowledge, he personally tasted each and work was characterized by great attention imitating the species-typical hooting calls, every new leaf or fruit that he saw his to the smallest details, resulting in com- after which the apes would approach and chimpanzees consume—the ultimate act of prehensive catalogues of behavior patterns obtain food. This way, their normal roaming identification with one’s subjects. [9]. Nishida’s magnum opus, Chimpanzees patterns remained intact, as they never Nishida had met ‘‘my’’ chimpanzees of the Lakeshore: Natural History and Culture at attached themselves to a fixed feeding site.
Recommended publications
  • Summary of HOPE Project
    February, 2004 Prof. Tetsuro Matsuzawa Kyoto University, Japan Summary of HOPE Project The human mind is as much a product of evolution as the human body. Where did we come from? What is human nature? To answer such fundamental questions, we must address the question of how humans have evolved. Humans (scientific name Homo sapiens) are a species of primate, a species of mammal, and a species of vertebrate. The HOPE project aims to study the “Primate Origins of Human Evolution” focusing on apes and monkeys as our evolutionary neighbors. HOPE is an anagram of our research title, and also expresses a hope for conservation. All primate species other than humans are designated as endangered or threatened in CITES (Washington convention on endangered animals and plants). Therefore, in parallel to advanced studies of primates, we must also make concentrated efforts for the conservation of monkeys and apes in tropical forests, as species symbolic of biological diversity and the global environment. Japan is unique among the advanced countries of the world in having an indigenous species of nonhuman primate. Thanks to the country’s natural and cultural background, Japanese primatological study has made unique contributions to the world. The late Kinji Imanishi (1902-1992) and his colleagues began the study of wild monkeys in Koshima, Miyazaki, Japan, in 1948. The study of Koshima monkeys continues to be conducted by the Primate Research Institute of Kyoto University (KUPRI) to the present day. Fifty-five years have passed, throughout which researchers kept records of monkeys of eight generations: the history of a monkey kingdom.
    [Show full text]
  • What, If Anything, Is a Darwinian Anthropology?
    JONATHAN MARKS What, if anything, is a Darwinian anthropology? Not too many years ago, I was scanning the job advertisements in anthropology and stumbled upon one for a faculty post in a fairly distinguished department in California. The ad specified that they were looking for someone who ‘studied culture from an evolutionary perspective’. I was struck by that, because it seemed to me that the alternative would be a creationist perspective, and I had never heard of anyone in this century who did that. Obviously my initial reading was incorrect. That department specifically wanted someone with a particular methodological and ideo- logical orientation; ‘evolutionary perspective’ was there as a code for something else. It has fascinated me for a number of years that Darwin stands as a very powerful symbol in biology. On the one hand, he represents the progressive aspect of science in its perpetual struggle against the perceived oppressive forces of Christianity (Larson 1997); and on the other, he represents as well the prevailing stodgy and stultified scientific orthodoxy against which any new bold and original theory must cast itself (Gould 1980). Proponents of the neutral theory (King and Jukes 1969) or of punctuated equilibria (Eldredge 1985) represented themselves as Darwinists to the outside worlds, and as anti-Darwinists to the inside world. Thus, Darwinism can be both the new and improved ideology you should bring home today, and is also the superseded Brand X ideology. That is indeed a powerful metaphor, to represent something as well as its opposite. Curiously, nobody ever told me in my scientific training that scientific progress was somehow predicated on the development of powerful metaphors.
    [Show full text]
  • Bringing in Darwin Bradley A. Thayer
    Bringing in Darwin Bradley A. Thayer Evolutionary Theory, Realism, and International Politics Efforts to develop a foundation for scientiªc knowledge that would unite the natural and social sci- ences date to the classical Greeks. Given recent advances in genetics and evolu- tionary theory, this goal may be closer than ever.1 The human genome project has generated much media attention as scientists reveal genetic causes of dis- eases and some aspects of human behavior. And although advances in evolu- tionary theory may have received less attention, they are no less signiªcant. Edward O. Wilson, Roger Masters, and Albert Somit, among others, have led the way in using evolutionary theory and social science to produce a synthesis for understanding human behavior and social phenomena.2 This synthesis posits that human behavior is simultaneously and inextricably a result of evo- lutionary and environmental causes. The social sciences, including the study of international politics, may build upon this scholarship.3 In this article I argue that evolutionary theory can improve the realist theory of international politics. Traditional realist arguments rest principally on one of two discrete ultimate causes, or intellectual foundations. The ªrst is Reinhold Niebuhr’s argument that humans are evil. The second is grounded in the work Bradley A. Thayer is an Assistant Professor of Political Science at the University of Minnesota—Duluth. I am grateful to Mlada Bukovansky, Stephen Chilton, Christopher Layne, Michael Mastanduno, Roger Masters, Paul Sharp, Alexander Wendt, Mike Winnerstig, and Howard Wriggins for their helpful comments. I thank Nathaniel Fick, David Hawkins, Jeremy Joseph, Christopher Kwak, Craig Nerenberg, and Jordana Phillips for their able research assistance.
    [Show full text]
  • The Descent of Edward Wilson
    prospectmagazine.co.uk http://www.prospectmagazine.co.uk/magazine/edward-wilson-social-conquest- earth-evolutionary-errors-origin-species/ The descent of Edward Wilson A new book on evolution by a great biologist makes a slew of mistakes The Social Conquest of Earth By Edward O Wilson (WW Norton, £18.99, May) When he received the manuscript of The Origin of Species, John Murray, the publisher, sent it to a referee who suggested that Darwin should jettison all that evolution stuff and concentrate on pigeons. It’s funny in the same way as the spoof review of Lady Chatterley’s Lover, which praised its interesting “passages on pheasant raising, the apprehending of poachers, ways of controlling vermin, and other chores and duties of the professional gamekeeper” but added: “Unfortunately one is obliged to wade through many pages of extraneous material in order to discover and savour these sidelights on the management of a Midland shooting estate, and in this reviewer’s opinion this book can not take the place of JR Miller’s Practical Gamekeeping.” I am not being funny when I say of Edward Wilson’s latest book that there are interesting and informative chapters on human evolution, and on the ways of social insects (which he knows better than any man alive), and it was a good idea to write a book comparing these two pinnacles of social evolution, but unfortunately one is obliged to wade through many pages of erroneous and downright perverse misunderstandings of evolutionary theory. In particular, Wilson now rejects “kin selection” (I shall explain this below) and replaces it with a revival of “group selection”—the poorly defined and incoherent view that evolution is driven by the differential survival of whole groups of organisms.
    [Show full text]
  • Title MAHALE and GOMBE COMPARED: PATTERNS
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by Kyoto University Research Information Repository MAHALE AND GOMBE COMPARED: PATTERNS OF Title RESEARCH ON WILD CHIMPANZEES IN TANZANIA OVER FOUR DECADES Author(s) McGREW, W.C. Citation African Study Monographs (2007), 28(3): 143-153 Issue Date 2007-09 URL http://dx.doi.org/10.14989/68260 Right Type Departmental Bulletin Paper Textversion publisher Kyoto University African Study Monographs, 28(3): 143-153, September 2007 143 MAHALE AND GOMBE COMPARED: PATTERNS OF RESEARCH ON WILD CHIMPANZEES IN TANZANIA OVER FOUR DECADES W.C. McGREW Departments of Anthropology and Zoology, Miami University and Leverhulme Centre for Human Evolutionary Studies, University of Cambridge ABSTRACT Students of science have contrasted Japanese and Western primatology. This paper aims to test such claims by comparing two long-term African field projects, Mahale and Gombe, in terms of research productivity as measured by scientific publications. Gombe, directed by Jane Goodall since 1960, and Mahale, directed by Toshisada Nishida since 1965, have much in common, in addition to their main focus on the eastern chimpanzee, Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii. They have produced similar total numbers of journal articles, books and chapters since the projects were founded. When these are categorized by subject matter, the main topics make up a similar proportion of publications, e.g. social relations, behavioural ecology, sex and reproduction, etc. Although most research output is on similar subjects, there are important differences between the sites, e.g. Mahale emphasizing medici- nal plant use, Gombe predominating in modelling human evolution. Both sites favour pub- lishing in Primates among the specialist primatological journals, but important differences exist in publishing elsewhere.
    [Show full text]
  • Pan Africa News 15(1) PDF(651Kb)
    Pan Africa News TheThe Newsletter Newsletter of the of theCommittee Committee for forthe theCare Care andand Conservation Conservation of ofChimpanzees, Chimpanzees, and and the the MahaleMahale Wildlife Wildlife Conservation Conservation Society Society JUNE 2008 VOL. 15, NO. 1 P. A . N . EDITORIAL STAFF Contents Chief Editor: <NEWS> Toshisada Nishida, Japan Monkey Centre, Japan Drs. Jane Goodall and Toshisada Nishida win 2008 Leakey Deputy Chief Editors: Prize! / Dr. Toshisada Nishida wins 2008 IPS Lifetime Kazuhiko Hosaka, Kamakura Women’s University, Japan Achievement Award! 1 Michio Nakamura, Kyoto University, Japan <ARTICLE> Associate Editors: Hunting with tools by Mahale chimpanzees Christophe Boesch, Max-Planck Institute, Germany Michio Nakamura & Noriko Itoh 3 Jane Goodall, Jane Goodall Institute, USA Takayoshi Kano, Kyoto University, Japan <NOTE> Tetsuro Matsuzawa, Kyoto University, Japan Snare removal by a chimpanzee of the Sonso community, William C. McGrew, University of Cambridge, UK Budongo Forest (Uganda) John C. Mitani, University of Michigan, USA Stephen Amati, Fred Babweteera & Roman M Wittig 6 Vernon Reynolds, Budongo Forest Project, UK <NOTE> Yukimaru Sugiyama, Kyoto University, Japan Use of wet hair to capture swarming termites by a Richard W. Wrangham, Harvard University, USA chimpanzee in Mahale, Tanzania Editorial Secretaries: Mieko Kiyono-Fuse 8 Noriko Itoh, Japan Monkey Centre, Japan <FORUM> Koichiro Zamma, GARI Hayashibara, Japan Why were guava trees cut down in Mahale Park? The Agumi Inaba, Japan Monkey Centre, Japan question of exterminating all introduced plants Toshisada Nishida 12 Instructions for Authors: Pan Africa News publishes articles, notes, reviews, forums, news, essays, book reviews, letters to <NEWS> editor, and classified ads (restricted to non-profit organizations) on any aspect of conservation and Drs.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Adaptation to the Control of Fire
    Human Adaptation to the Control of Fire The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Wrangham, Richard W., and Rachel Naomi Carmody. 2010. Human adaptation to the control of fire. Evolutionary Anthropology 19(5): 187–199. Published Version doi:10.1002/evan.20275 Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:8944723 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Open Access Policy Articles, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#OAP Human adaptation to the control of fire Richard Wrangham* and Rachel Carmody Department of Human Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University 11 Divinity Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA For Evolutionary Anthropology * Corresponding Author Telephone: +1-617-495-5948 Fax: +1-617-496-8041 email: [email protected] Text Pages: 23 (pp. 3-25) References: 95 (pp. 26-35) Figures and Legends: 4 (pp. 36-41) Text boxes: 1 (pp. 42-45) Words: 10,479 Key words: cooking, life history, anatomy, behavior, cognition 1 About the authors: Richard Wrangham is a professor in the Department of Human Evolutionary Biology at Harvard University. Since 1987 he has directed a study of chimpanzee behavioral ecology in Kibale National Park, Uganda (currently co-director with Martin Muller). He is the author of Catching Fire: How Cooking Made Us Human (2009, Basic Books). E-mail: [email protected]. Rachel Carmody is a Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Déroutants Primates : Approches Émergentes Aux Frontières De L’Anthropologie Et De La Primatologie
    5 | 2013 Varia http://primatologie.revues.org/1250 Dossier Déroutants primates : approches émergentes aux frontières de l’anthropologie et de la primatologie Special section on Disconcerting primates: emerging approaches in the anthropology/primatology borderland Dossier proposé et édité avec le concours de la revue par Vincent Leblan Vincent Leblan Introduction: emerging approaches in the anthropology/primatology borderland [Texte intégral] Introduction : approches émergentes aux frontières de l’anthropologie et de la primatologie Article 62 Takanori Oishi 5 | 2013 Varia http://primatologie.revues.org/1250 Human-Gorilla and Gorilla-Human: Dynamics of Human-animal boundaries and interethnic relationships in the central African rainforest [Texte intégral] Homme-gorilles et gorille-hommes : dynamiques de la frontière homme-animal et relations interethniques dans la forêt d’Afrique centrale Article 63 Gen Yamakoshi et Vincent Leblan Conflicts between indigenous and scientific concepts of landscape management for wildlife conservation: human-chimpanzee politics of coexistence at Bossou, Guinea [Texte intégral] Conflits entre conceptions locales et scientifiques de la gestion du paysage pour la conservation de la faune : politiques de la coexistence entre humains et chimpanzés à Bossou, Guinée Article 64 Naoki Matsuura, Yuji Takenoshita et Juichi Yamagiwa Eco-anthropologie et primatologie pour la conservation de la biodiversité : un projet collaboratif dans le Parc National de Moukalaba-Doudou, Gabon [Texte intégral] Ecological anthropology
    [Show full text]
  • Professor Masao Kawai, a Pioneer and Leading Scholar in Primatology and Writer of Animal Stories for Children
    Primates (2021) 62:677–695 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10329-021-00938-2 EDITORIAL Professor Masao Kawai, a pioneer and leading scholar in primatology and writer of animal stories for children Masayuki Nakamichi1 Received: 20 July 2021 / Accepted: 28 July 2021 / Published online: 24 August 2021 © Japan Monkey Centre 2021 This Editorial is dedicated to Professor Masao Kawai (Fig. 1), who passed away on May 14th, 2021. He served as the sixth Editor-in-Chief of Primates for 15 years (1981–1995). The following is a collection of memories from 20 scholars. A last eulogy for Prof. Kawai by his last student Naofumi Nakagawa Professor Emeritus Masao Kawai is one of the so-called frst generation of Japanese primatologists, comprising students of Kinji Imanishi, the pioneer of the discipline of Japanese primatology (Matsuzawa and Yamagiwa 2018), and the frst president of the Primate Society of Japan (Kawai 1985). It is my honor and privilege to deliver this memorial address for Prof. Kawai as one of his last students. Prof. Kawai served as my mentor until his retirement from the Primate Research Institute of Kyoto University (KUPRI), when I was in the frst year of my doctoral study. Although I am now 61, when I frst met him, I quickly realized that I was no match for his extensive knowledge and enlightened spirit, which led to a wide range of human networks. Prof. Kawai was so busy that it was very difcult for me to see him; however, whenever I happened to see him in a meeting room during lunchtime, or to meet with him in his own ofce, he would talk to me in a friendly manner with much humor, while providing profound insights.
    [Show full text]
  • Primates, Plants, and Parasites: the Evolution of Animal Self-Medication and Ethnomedicine - Michael A
    ETHNOPHARMACOLOGY - Vol. II - Primates, Plants, and Parasites: The Evolution of Animal Self-Medication and Ethnomedicine - Michael A. Huffman, Sylvia K. Vitazkova PRIMATES, PLANTS, AND PARASITES: THE EVOLUTION OF ANIMAL SELF-MEDICATION AND ETHNOMEDICINE Michael A. Huffman, Section of Ecology, Primate Research Institute, Kyoto University, JAPAN Sylvia K. Vitazkova, EPSCoR, University of Virgin Islands, 2 Brewer’s Bay, St. Thomas, USVI, USA. Keywords: African great apes, zoopharmacognosy, self-medication, diet, ethnomedicine, parasite control, evolution, phytochemistry. Contents 1. Introduction 2. Animal self-medication and ethnomedicine 3. The impact of parasites on the evolution of self-medicative behavior 4. Food as medicine in animals and humans 5. Use of plants as medicine by chimpanzees in the wild 5.1. Whole leaf swallowing and the physical expulsion of parasite 5.2. Vernonia amygdalina and bitter pith chewing behavior 5.3. The ethnomedicine and phytochemistry of bitter pith chewing 6. A link between animal self-medication and ethnomedicine 7. Tongwe ethnozoology and health care 8. Future studies and directions of research Acknowledgments Glossary Bibliography Biographical Sketches Summary Early in the co-evolution of plant–animal relationships, some arthropod species began to utilize the chemical defenses of plants to protect themselves from their own predators and parasites. It is likely thus that the origins of herbal medicine have their roots deep within the animalUNESCO kingdom. Humans have looked – to wildEOLSS and domestic animals for sources of herbal remedies since prehistoric times. Both folklore and living examples provide accounts of howSAMPLE medicinal plants were obtained CHAPTERS by observing the behavior of animals. Animals too learn about the details of self-medication by watching each other.
    [Show full text]
  • The Human Family—Its Evolutionary Context and Diversity
    social sciences $€ £ ¥ Review The Human Family—Its Evolutionary Context and Diversity Karen L. Kramer Department of Anthropology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA; [email protected] Abstract: The family defines many aspects of our daily lives, and expresses a wide array of forms across individuals, cultures, ecologies and time. While the nuclear family is the norm today in developed economies, it is the exception in most other historic and cultural contexts. Yet, many aspects of how humans form the economic and reproductive groups that we recognize as families are distinct to our species. This review pursues three goals: to overview the evolutionary context in which the human family developed, to expand the conventional view of the nuclear family as the ‘traditional family’, and to provide an alternative to patrifocal explanations for family formation. To do so, first those traits that distinguish the human family are reviewed with an emphasis on the key contributions that behavioral ecology has made toward understanding dynamics within and between families, including life history, kin selection, reciprocity and conflict theoretical frameworks. An overview is then given of several seminal debates about how the family took shape, with an eye toward a more nuanced view of male parental care as the basis for family formation, and what cooperative breeding has to offer as an alternative perspective. Keywords: behavioral ecology; family studies; cooperative breeding; patrilineal Citation: Kramer, Karen L. 2021. The 1. Introduction Human Family—Its Evolutionary Family formation shapes many aspects of our daily lives—who we work, eat and sleep Context and Diversity.
    [Show full text]
  • Title Tribute to Prof. Toshisada Nishida Author(S) Reynolds
    Title Tribute to Prof. Toshisada Nishida Author(s) Reynolds, Vernon Citation Pan Africa News (2011), 18(special issue): 2-2 Issue Date 2011-09 URL http://hdl.handle.net/2433/147294 Right Copyright © Pan Africa News. Type Article Textversion publisher Kyoto University 2 Pan Africa News, 18 special issue, September 2011 His passing cannot be mourned too much. He was a pio- neer in the study of wild chimpanzees. Since 1965, he Tribute to Prof. Toshisada maintained research at Mahale, Tanzania, and accumu- Nishida lated accomplishments unique to his team, rivaling an- other longtime chimpanzee researcher, Dr. Jane Goodall Vernon Reynolds whose work at Gombe is well known. He published many Oxford University, UK/Budongo Conservation Field Station excellent papers, for example, on patrilineal structure of I first met Prof. Nishida (“Toshi” as we came to know chimpanzee society, political strategy among males, and him) on a visit to the Mahale Mountains chimpanzee scientific documentation of newly discovered cultural project which I made in the late 1970s. I met up with behaviors. He was awarded the Leakey Prize and the In- my colleague Yuki Sugiyama in Dar es Salaam and we ternational Primatological Society Lifetime Achievement travelled across Tanzania to Kigoma. There we were sup- Award. In addition, he served as President of the Inter- posed to meet a boat from the chimp project which would national Primatological Society. These honors tell how take us down Lake Tanganyika to Mahale. But it turned highly he was esteemed internationally. out that the boat’s outboard motor was broken. We waited a few days during which we met Toshi and spent some time with him, talking about his work and the Mahale chimpanzees.
    [Show full text]