DOCSLIB.ORG

Finding of No Significant Impact and Final

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Finding of No Significant Impact and Final Fin ding of No Significant Impact & Final Environmental Assessment United States Department of Agriculture Fo r the Blackstone River Fish Passage Restoration Project Natural Resources Blackstone River, Rhode Island Conservation Service November 2008 ~NRCS FONSI, Page 1 of 4 Natural Resources Conservation Service October 2008 Finding of No Significant Impact for the Environmental Assessment (EA) on The Blackstone River Fish Passage Restoration Project I. AGENCY ROLE AND RESPONSIBILITY- United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) -Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) In accordance with the NRCS regulations (7 Code of Federal Regulations Part 650) implementing the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), NRCS has completed an environmental review of the following proposed action: The construction of Denil-style fish ladders and eel passages at the Main Street, Slater Mill, and Valley Falls Dams. The removal of the Elizabeth Webbing Dam was also considered in the analysis as a part of the proposed action. Although NRCS does not have any formal federal decision-making authority in the form of a long term agreement to undertake activities to restore aquatic passage at the Elizabeth Webbing Dam, it has been included within the scope of the EA because of its integral relationship to the three funded fish passage projects. Further dam removal feasibility analyses will be required for the removal or breaching of Elizabeth Webbing Dam. As no federal action by NRCS is proposed for the Elizabeth Webbing Dam, this feasibility study is beyond the scope of this EA. NRCS anticipates that any adverse effects, as documented by future feasibility studies, will be evaluated and appropriate mitigation measures employed by future project proponents of this site. II. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED IN THE EA Two alternatives were analyzed in the EA and are characterized as follows: Alternative 1 (Proposed Action) - Construction of fish ladders at Main Street, Slater, Mill, Valley Falls Dams, and removal of Elizabeth Webbing Dam (as per discussion in Section I) Alternative 2 (No Action) - Diadromous fish passage projects will not be implemented IV. NRCS DECISION Based on the evaluation in the EA, I have chosen to select Alternative 1 as the Agency Preferred Alternative. I have taken into consideration all of the potential impacts of the proposed action, which have been evaluated in this EA, and balanced those impacts with considerations of the Agency's purpose and need for action. Blackstone River Fish Passage Restoration Project Environmental Assessment Blackstone River, Rhode Island ~NRCS FONSI, Page 2 of 4 Natural Resources Conservation Service October 2008 VI. FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT To detennine the significance of the action analyzed in this EA, NRCS is required by NEPA, 40 CFR 1508.27 and NRCS regulations to consider the context and intensity of the proposed action. Based on a review ofNEPA criteria for significant effects and the analysis in the EA, I have detennined that the action to be selected, Alternative 1 (Agency Preferred Alternative), would not have a significant effect upon the quality of the human environment, particularly when focusing on the significant adverse impacts which NEP A is intended to help decision makers avoid, minimize, or mitigate. Therefore, preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) on the final action is not required under Section 102(2)(c) ofNEPA, CEQ implementing regulations (40 CFR Part 1500-1508, 1508.13), or NRCS environmental review procedures (7 CFR Part 650). This Finding is based on the following factors (described in CEQ's implementing regulations at 1508.27 and NRCS regulations at 7 CFR 650.4(k)): 1) The EA evaluated both beneficial and adverse impacts of the proposed action. There are no significant adverse effects associated with Alternative 1 either directly, indirectly, or cumulatively from implementation of ofthe agency preferred alternative. The NRCS engineering design and project pennitting processes will be used to identify appropriate actions necessary to minimize any potential adverse effects as required by NRCS regulations and policy (General Manual Title 190 Part 410) (see Section 4.3 of attached EA). 2) Alternative 1 does not significantly affect public health or safety as discussed in applicable sections of this EA. 3) There are no anticipated significant effects to historic or cultural resources, park lands, prime farmlands, wetlands, wild and scenic rivers, or ecologically critical areas from selection of Alternative 1. NRCS regulations and policy (NRCS General Manual Title 420 Part 401 and General Manual Title 190 Part 410), require that NRCS identify, assess, and avoid effects to historic or cultural resources, park lands, prime farmlands, wetlands, wild and scenic rivers, or ecologically critical areas. In accordance with these requirements it is not anticipated that implementing the proposed action would have adverse effects on these resources (see Section 4 of the attached EA). 4) The effects on the human environment are not considered controversial for Alternative 1. This is discussed in Section 4 of the attached EA. 5) Alternative 1 is not considered highly uncertain and does not involve unique or unknown risks. To the extent that effects related to implementation of the proposed action may result in significant effects to the quality of the human environment; NRCS, through the federal and state regulatory pennitting process, will implement any additional measures as required by law. Blackstone River Fish Passage Restoration Project Environmental Assessment Blackstone River, Rhode Island ~NRCS FONSI, Page 3 of 4 Natural Resources Conservation Service October 2008 6) Alternative 1 will not establish a precedent for future actions with significant effects, nor does it represent a decision in principle about future considerations. The proposed action will be carried out through implementation of three individual Wildlife Habitat Incentive Program long term agreements. 7) Alternative 1 will not result in individually or cumulatively significant adverse impacts to the human environment, particularly when focusing on the significant adverse impacts which NEP A is intended to help decision makers avoid, minimize, or mitigate. NRCS will document direct, indirect and cumulative actions during site-specific environmental evaluations and will identifY and incorporate appropriate actions necessary to minimize potential adverse effects. Cumulative impacts resulting from Alternative 1 are anticipated to be beneficial overall (see section 4 in the attached EA). 8) The proposed action will not cause loss or destruction of significant scientific, cultural, or historical resources. NRCS follows the procedures developed in accordance with a Nationwide programmatic agreement between NRCS, the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation, and the National Conference of State Historic Preservation Officers, which called for NRCS to develop consultation agreements with State Historic Preservation Officers and Federally-recognized Tribes (or their designated Tribal Historic Preservation Officers). Furthermore, Rhode Island NRCS maintains a State Level Agreement between USDA NRCS Rhode Island State Office and the Rhode Island State Historic Preservation Officer (RI SHPO) (dated February 2008). As per this agreement, NRCS has consultated with RI SHPO to ensure compliance with Secion 106 requirements. Rhode Island NRCS also maintains a state level agreement with the Narragansett Indian Tribal Historic Preservation Office and is in direct consultation with the Tribe on this proposed action (see attached EA). 9) The proposed action will not adversely affect endangered or threatened species, marine mammals or critical habitat. NRCS has consulted with the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, and the National Marine Fisheries Service to insure these species are not jeopardized and that there are no adverse modifications to designated critical habitat (see section 4.8 of the attached EA). The proposed action will have overall positive benefits to National Marine Fisheries Service Species of Concern: American Shad, alewife, and blueback herring. 10) The proposed action does not violate Federal, State, local law, or requirements imposed for protection of the environment. The major laws identified include the Clean Water Act, Clean Air Act, Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act, the Endangered Species Act, National Historic Preservation Act, the Marine Mammal Protection Act, the Executive Order on Environmental Justice, and the Migratory Bird Treaty Act. Alternative 1 is consistent with the Blackstone River Fish Passage Restoration Project Environmental Assessment Blackstone River, Rhode Island ~NRCS FONSI, Page 4 of 4 Natural Resources Conservation Service October 2008 requirements of these laws. In addition, NRCS will work applicable regulatory as necessary on a site-specific basis to avoid, mitigate or reduce any potential collateral adverse effects (see section 4 of the attached EA) .. Therefore, based on the information presented in the attached Blackstone River Fish Passage Restoration Project EA, I find in accordance with 40 CFR Part 1508.13 that the selection of the Agency Preferred Alternative (Alternative 1) is not a Major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment that would require preparation of an EIS. Date Rhode Island State Conservationist, Natural Resources Conservation Service U.S. Department of Agriculture Blackstone
Load more

Recommended publications
  • RHODE ISLAND RIVERS COUNCIL HISTORICAL OUTLINE 1989-1990: Lieutenant Governor's Task Force on Rivers, Final Report & Recommendations, 58 Pages, February, 1990
    RHODE ISLAND RIVERS COUNCIL HISTORICAL OUTLINE 1989-1990: Lieutenant Governor's Task Force on Rivers, Final Report & Recommendations, 58 pages, February, 1990. 1991-2000: Governor Bruce Sundlun inaugurated January 1, 1991. General Assembly created RI Rivers Council (RC) – RI General Law 46-28. Kenneth Payne became RC chair. Statewide Planning Program provides staff support to RC. RC concluded in 1992 that "more effective integration of existing programs and authority for rivers is needed." RC formulated draft classifications for rivers in 1993. RC held four workshops in northern, central, southern and eastern RI in 1994 to refine draft river classifications. Governor Lincoln Almond inaugurated January 1, 1995. Michael Cassidy, Planner for the City of Pawtucket, became RC chair. RC, working with the Divison of Planning, created digital maps of the state's watersheds. The State Planning Council adopted the RI Rivers Policy and Classification Plan, in January 1998, as State Guide Plan Element 162. RC established policies for recognizing local watershed councils in 1998. The Blackstone, Saugatucket and Wood-Pawcatuck were first river systems to have watershed councils designated by RC. Note: Designated watershed councils have certain legal authority and standing to represent their water bodies in state and local jurisdictions as well as be eligible for state grants via RC. 2001-2007: Meg Kerr became RC chair. General Assembly commences in 2001 providing annual legislative grants to RC from $22,000 to $52,000 range. Annual grant rounds commence from RC to designated local watershed councils generally in $2,500 to $7,500 range from Fiscal Year 2002 to the present.
    [Show full text]
  • Views of the Blackstone River and the Mumford River
    THE SHlNER~ AND ITS USE AS A SOURCE OF INCOME IN WORCESTER, AND SOUTHEASTERN WORCESTER COUNTY, MASSACHUSETTS By Robert William Spayne S.B., State Teachers College at Worcester, Massachusetts 19,3 A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Oberlin College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in the Department of Geography CONTENTS Ie INTRODUCTION Location of Thesis Area 1 Purpose of Study 1 Methods of Study 1 Acknowledgments 2 II. GEOGRAPHY OF SOUTHERN WORCESTER COUNTY 4 PIiYSICAL GEOGRAPHY 4 Topography 4 stream Systems 8 Ponds 11 Artificial 11 Glacial 12 Ponds for Bait Fishing 14 .1 oJ Game Fishing Ponds 15 Climatic Characteristics 16 Weather 18 POPULATION 20 Size of Population 20 Distribution of Population 21 Industrialization 22 III. GEOGRAPHICAL BASIS FOR TEE SHINER INDUSTRY 26 Recreational Demands 26 Game Fish Resources 26 l~umber of ;Ponds 28 Number of Fishermerf .. 29 Demand for Bait 30 l IV. GENERAL NATURE OF THE BAIT INDUSTRY 31 ,~ Number of Bait Fishermen 31 .1 Range in Size of Operations 32 Nature of Typical Operations 34 Personality of the Bait Fishermen 34 V. THE SHINER - ITS DESCRIPTION, HABITS AND , CHARACTERISTICS 35 VI. 'STANDARD AND IlIIlPROVISED EQUIPMENT USED IN .~ THE IhllUSTRY 41 Transportation 41 Keeping the Bait Alive 43 Foul Weather Gear 47 Types of Nets 48 SUCCESSFUL METHODS USED IN NETTING BAIT 52 Open Water Fishing 5'2 " Ice Fishing 56 .-:-) VII. ECONOMIC IMPORTANCE OF THE SHINER INDUSTRY ~O VIII. FUTURE OUTLOOK FOR THE SHINER INDUSTRY 62 IX. BIBLIOGRAPHY 69 x. APPENDIX 72 LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS Following Page .
    [Show full text]
  • Geological Survey
    imiF.NT OF Tim BULLETIN UN ITKI) STATKS GEOLOGICAL SURVEY No. 115 A (lECKJKAPHIC DKTIOXARY OF KHODK ISLAM; WASHINGTON GOVKRNMKNT PRINTING OFF1OK 181)4 LIBRARY CATALOGUE SLIPS. i United States. Department of the interior. (U. S. geological survey). Department of the interior | | Bulletin | of the | United States | geological survey | no. 115 | [Seal of the department] | Washington | government printing office | 1894 Second title: United States geological survey | J. W. Powell, director | | A | geographic dictionary | of | Rhode Island | by | Henry Gannett | [Vignette] | Washington | government printing office 11894 8°. 31 pp. Gannett (Henry). United States geological survey | J. W. Powell, director | | A | geographic dictionary | of | Khode Island | hy | Henry Gannett | [Vignette] Washington | government printing office | 1894 8°. 31 pp. [UNITED STATES. Department of the interior. (U. S. geological survey). Bulletin 115]. 8 United States geological survey | J. W. Powell, director | | * A | geographic dictionary | of | Ehode Island | by | Henry -| Gannett | [Vignette] | . g Washington | government printing office | 1894 JS 8°. 31pp. a* [UNITED STATES. Department of the interior. (Z7. S. geological survey). ~ . Bulletin 115]. ADVERTISEMENT. [Bulletin No. 115.] The publications of the United States Geological Survey are issued in accordance with the statute approved March 3, 1879, which declares that "The publications of the Geological Survey shall consist of the annual report of operations, geological and economic maps illustrating the resources and classification of the lands, and reports upon general and economic geology and paleontology. The annual report of operations of the Geological Survey shall accompany the annual report of the Secretary of the Interior. All special memoirs and reports of said Survey shall be issued in uniform quarto series if deemed necessary by tlie Director, but other­ wise in ordinary octavos.
    [Show full text]
  • West River Stream Team Shoreline Survey Report & Action Plan
    %ODFNVWRQH5LYHU:DWHUVKHG$VVRFLDWLRQ :HVW5LYHU6WUHDP7HDP 6KRUHOLQH6XUYH\5HSRUW $FWLRQ3ODQ June 30, 2007 Thanks to: Commonwealth of Massachusetts Riverways Adopt-A-Stream Program and UNIBANK for their assistance in funding this project. Special thanks go out to our valued Stream Team members without whom this project would not be possible; West River area residents, businesses, and landowners for their cooperation; the Blackstone River and Canal Heritage State Park at River Bend Farm; and the Town of Uxbridge, especially the Uxbridge Conservation Commission. Preface The West River Stream Team members Erin, Steve, Jeremy, and Jack Bennett John and Elaine Czebotar William Dausey Barbara Johnson Mike, Tom, and Phil McMullin Gwyn Mills Joel Morgenstern Joan Newton Scot, Marie, and Andrea Pendleton Katherine Smith Charley Sweet James Plasse Michael Pouliot Michelle Walsh Commonwealth of Massachusetts Riverways Adopt-a-Stream Advisor Gabrielle Stebbins, Adopt-A-Stream Program Coordinator Blackstone River Watershed Association Project Coordinator Michelle Walsh, Environmental Outreach Coordinator Project Coordination Michelle Walsh, Environmental Outreach Coordinator for the Blackstone River Watershed Association (BRWA) advertised for volunteers in various media throughout the Blackstone Valley area including but not limited to press releases in local newspapers, announcements on local cable channels, letters to environmental organizations, high schools, Boy Scout troops and town officials, flyers and e-mails to various environmental organizations. A shoreline survey training session was scheduled at River Bend Farm in Uxbridge, MA on May 14, 2007. Approximately forty volunteers attended the meeting. At this meeting, volunteers were instructed on how to conduct a shoreline survey and were given survey sheets. After the meeting, the West River was sectioned into 9 reaches; volunteers were organized in teams and selected a section of the River to survey.
    [Show full text]
  • Town of Upton Open Space and Recreation Plan
    ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ MAY 2011 TOWN OF UPTON D OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION PLAN a f North t Prepared by: Upton Open Space Committee (A Subcommittee of the Upton Conservation Commission) ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Town of Upton D OPEN SPACE rAND RECREATION PLAN a f t May 2011 Prepared by: The Upton Open Space Committee (A Subcommittee of the Upton Conservation Commission) Town of Upton Draft Open Space and Recreation Plan – May 2011 __________________________________________________________________________________________________________ DEDICATION The members of the Open Space Committee wish to dedicate this Plan to the memory of our late fellow member, Francis Walleston who graciously served on the Milford and Upton Conservation Commissions for many years. __________________________________________________________________ ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Upton Open Space Committee Members Tom Dodd Scott Heim Rick Holmes Mike Penko Marcella Stasa Bill Taylor Assistance was provided by: Stephen Wallace (Central Massachusetts Regional Planning Commission) Peter Flinker and Hillary King (Dodson Associates) Dave Adams (Chair, Upton Recreation Commission) Chris Scott (Chair, Upton Conservation Commission) Ken Picard (as a Member of the Upton Planning Board) Upton Board of Selectmen. Trish Settles (Central Massachusetts Regional Planning Commission) __________________________________________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • Central Falls Mill Historic District
    ___ ___ 10.300 IRrv 10 ui I III. INI IIflI IJNIII:.ISi, I lI.P.IINll:NI IFOR NPS USE ONLY NATIONAL PAflK SERVICI: I NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES INVENTORY-- NOMINATION FORM LOATE ENTERED SEE INSTRUCTIONS IN HOW TO COMPLETE NA TIONAL REGISTER FORMS TYPE ALL ENTRIES -- COMPLETE APPLICABLE SECTIONS JNArvIE Historic Resources of Central Falls. Rhode Island Inventory: Historic and Architectural Properties HISTORIC Partial AND/OR COMMON ELOCATION STREET&NUMBER Incorporation limits of Certra1 Falls, Rhode Island FOR PUBLICATION CITY. TOWN CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT Central Falls. Ill Honorable Fernand J. St Germain STATE COOE COUNTY CODE Rhode Island 4/ Providence 007 CLASSIFICATION CATEGORY OWNERSHIP STATUS PRESENT USE CPUDIIC LOCCUPIED ._.MUSEUM DUILOINGISI XPRIVAIE LUNOCCUPIEO X..COMMERCIAL LF’AHK WORK IN PROGRESS >ç.FRIVAIE RFSIOENCE PUBLIC ACQUISITION ACCESSIBLE ...ENTEI!TAINMENT x_REL131OIJS . ,.OBJECT PROCESS X15 RESTRICTD x COVI:ITNMENI ..Sc’I NIIFIC Mu 1 t I pie resource CONSIOEREO CYES: UNnESTRICIEO LINDUSTIIIAL 1FINSRORr4 ‘ION . MILITAflY L. OIlIER N u rs in g hoie EOWNER OF PROPERTY NAME Multiple ownership STREET & NUMBER CITYIOWN STAlE V IC IN IF? UF L2LOCATIONOF LEGAL DESCRIPTiON COURTHOUSE REGISTRY OF DFFIS.EFC Central Pal Is Cs ty Hal I SWEET & NUMBIIT 580 Broad Street CIIY. TOWN STATE Central Falls Rhode Island REPRESENTATION IN EXISTING SURVEYS TITLE Statewide Historical Preservation Report, P-CF-i, Central Falls, R.I. OA1 E January, 1978 ._FEOEIIAL .XSIAIE .OUN IY .I OCAL DEPOSIFURY 1111 SURVEYRECOROS Rhode Island Historical Preservation Commission crY TOWN StAll ISO Benefit Street Providence Rhode Island See continuation sheet I NPS Form 109005 I 0MB No.1024-0018 382 .
    [Show full text]
  • ' <• ' >'•'(' FINAL RULE Adopted by the Rhode Island Rivers Council July
    SL, ciiuiiJ KutoiUa Center Si i L: O^' <• ' >'•'(' FINAL RULE Adopted by the Rhode Island Rivers Council July 13,2005 SDMS DocID 273446 State of Rhode Island and Providence Plantations Rhode Island Rivers Council PO Box 1565 North Kingstown, RI 02852 RULES AND REGULATIONS OF THE RHODE ISLAND RIVERS COUNCIL FOR WATERSHED COUNCIL GRANTS AND NOTIFICATION OF PROPOSED ACTIONS TO WATERSHED COUNCILS June 2005 Rule 1: Grant Funding for Watershed Councils/Associations R.I.G.L. Section 46-28-7(7) authorizes the Council to provide grants to local watershed councils/associations. 1.1 Eligibility Only those Watershed Councils/Associations formally designated by the Council are eligible for grants from the Council. 1.2 Allocation of Available Funds Upon determining the level of funding available, the Council may: 1.2.1 Set a maximum per project funding limit. 1.2.2 Establis ha maximum number of submissions per applicant for funding proposals. 1.2.3 Establish funding categorie ans d funding allocation for each category. 1.3 Solicitation of Grant Applicants In the event that funds are available, the Council shall solicit and accept grant applications. 1.4 Grant Application Form The Council shall develop and adopt a grant application form that shall qualify an applicant for consideration of receiving a grant. Application forms shall be distributed to organizations upon request. 1.5 Grant Application Acceptability Applications found to be complete will be referred to the Council for evaluation. Applications found to be incomplete will be returned to the applicant with a statement as to the deficiencies noted and a notice that the applicant can correct these and resubmit the application.
    [Show full text]
  • Blackstone River Visioning
    Blackstone River Visioning Prepared for: Massachusetts Audubon Society John H. Chafee Blackstone River Valley National Heritage Corridor Prepared by: Dodson Associates, Ltd. Landscape Architects and Planners 463 Main Street Ashfield, Massachusetts 01330 with Mullin Associates 206 North Valley Road Pelham, Massachusetts 01002 October, 2004 Table of Contents Executive Summary..................................................................... 1 Introduction and Overview.......................................................... 3 The River Visioning Project........................................................ 5 Blackstone River Reawakening: The River Initiatives Study.. 7 Regional Issues and Opportunities............................................. 10 Mapping and Geographic Analysis............................................. 11 Results of the Initial Public Workshops...................................... 12 Demonstration Site Visioning Charrettes.................................... 15 Conclusion.................................................................................. 27 Appendix A: Current Initiatives Along the Blackstone Riverway............................. 29 Appendix B: Design Charrette Posters....................................... 31 Appendix C: Contacts and Resources....................................... 41 Blackstone River Visioning 1 Executive Summary The Blackstone River Visioning Project was developed in 2002 by a coalition of groups led by the John H. Chafee Blackstone River Valley National Heritage Corridor Commission
    [Show full text]
  • RIRC Booklet Combined 2 27 2019
    THE RHODE ISLAND RIVERS COUNCIL www.ririvers.org One Capitol Hill Providence, Rhode Island 02908 [email protected] RHODE ISLAND RIVERS COUNCIL MEMBERSHIP Veronica Berounsky, Chair Alicia Eichinger, Vice Chair Robert Billington Rachel Calabro Walter Galloway Charles Horbert Elise Torello INSTITUTIONAL MEMBERS Paul Gonsalves for Michael DiBiase, Department of Administration Eugenia Marks for Kathleen Crawley, Water Resources Board Ernie Panciera for Janet Coit, Department of Environmental Management Peder Schaefer for Mayor James Diossa, League of Cities and Towns Mike Walker for Stefan Pryor, Commerce Corporation Jeff Willis for Grover Fugate, Coastal Resource Management Council ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Photographs in this publication provided by: Rhode Island Rivers Council Elise Torello, cover photograph, Upper Wood River Charles Biddle, "Children Planting, Middlebridge", pg. 1 Booklet compilation and design services provided by Liz Garofalo THANK YOU This booklet was made possible by a RI legislative grant sponsored by Representatives: Carol Hagan McEntee, (D-District 33, South Kingstown/Narragansett) Robert E. Craven, Sr., (D-District 32, North Kingstown) 2 RHODERHODE ISLANDISLAND WATERSHEDS WATERSHEDS MAP MAP 3 RHODE ISLAND RIVERS COUNCIL ABOUT US The Rhode Island Rivers Council (RIRC) is charged with coordinating state policies to protect rivers and watersheds. Our unique contribution is to strengthen local watershed councils as partners in rivers and watershed protection. Created by statute (RIGL 46-28) in 1991 as an associated function of the Rhode Island Water Resources Board, the RIRC mission is to preserve and improve the quality of Rhode Island's rivers and their watersheds and to work with public entities to develop plans to safely increase river use. Under the Rhode Island Rivers Council statute, rivers are defined as "a flowing body of water or estuary, including streams, creeks, brooks, ponds, coastal ponds, small lakes, and reservoirs." WHAT WE DO The RIRC plays a key role in the state's comprehensive environmental efforts.
    [Show full text]
  • Did You Fall in Love with Blackstone Heritage
    Blackstone Heritage Corridor 2018 for a walk, a tour, a GO! bike ride, a paddle, a boat ride, a special event or harvest experience – all in the month of September Proudly in the wonderful Blackstone sponsored by River Valley National Heritage Corridor. GO! Table of Contents Welcome ........................ 2-3 Map ............................... 4 Listing of Experiences & Events ...................... 8-36 Trash Responsibly ........... 15 Be a GearHead! ................ 19 Page 19 Our Newest National Park ..37 Bikeway Maps ............ 38-40 VIP Program .................... 42 Photo Contest ................. 42 Support the Blackstone Heritage Corridor ............ 45 Online Shop .................... 45 Page 37 SEPTEMBER 2018 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 Visit us at Page 38-40 BlackstoneHeritageCorridor.org for more free, guided experiences and special events (some may charge fees)! Updated daily. Page 42 670 Linwood Avenue Whitinsville, MA 01588 508-234-4242 BlackstoneHeritageCorridor.org Cover photo by Angie Stormont Page 42 ©2018 Blackstone Heritage Corridor, Inc. Table of Contents 1 The Blackstone River Valley National Heritage We welcome you Corridor is most notably known as the Birthplace to September in the of the American Industrial Revolution and the first place of tolerance and diversity in the Blackstone country. In the fall, its many other attributes come vividly into focus as the crispness of Heritage Corridor! autumn grows from the last warmth of summer. Explore our exceptional National Heritage Corridor during a season of anticipation. Every living thing is in preparation mode. Squirrels and chipmunks are gathering food for the winter.
    [Show full text]
  • River Bend Farm – Beginner and Intermediate Tours, Massachusetts
    BLACKSTONE RIVER & CANAL GUIDE River Bend Farm – Beginner and Intermediate Tours, Massachusetts 4 miles [Map: USGS Uxbridge] Tour 1 & 2 Level . Beginner – Blackstone Canal to Stanley Woolen Mill or NORTHBRIDGE Blackstone Canal to Rice City Pond and the Goat Hill Lock Towpath Lookout Rock Start / End. River Bend Farm Time . Approx. 1 hour Description. Flatwater Canal Portages . One portage on Tour 2 W Remnants o l f e Put-in is at the River Bend Farm Visitor Center in the Blackstone H i l Goat Hill l River & Canal Heritage State Park in Uxbridge, MA. The watered R 3 miles o Lock a section of the canal can be paddled in either direction, south to Wolfe d Hill the Stanley Woolen Mill (Tour 1) or north towards Rice City Pond (Tour 2). If you choose to head south, it is a leisurely paddle in the Blackstone Canal down to the Stanley Woolen Mill and back. The canal towpath runs along the side of the canal. If you choose to proceed Goat Hill U p north, paddle up the canal a short distance, then portage north and t o n proceed up the Blackstone Canal. Look for a small backwater Rice City R o TOUR 2 Pond a section on your left that will lead to a preserved canal-era artifact: d the Goat Hill Lock (1827). This is one of four remaining locks 2 miles along the Blackstone River. From 1828 to 1848 a series of 48 canal W e locks helped boats ascend and descend the elevation changes s Dams t R i between Worcester and Providence.
    [Show full text]
  • TMDL Status in Massachusetts Uxbridge, MA
    Summary of Waterbody Assessment and TMDL Status in Massachusetts Uxbridge, MA Waterbody Watershed Acres Miles Cause ID Name Name Category (In Town - Total) (In Town - Total) Non-Pollutant(s)*/Pollutant(s TMDL MA51-04_2008 Blackstone River Blackstone 5 0.8 11.3 Flow alteration* Metals Nutrients Organic enrichment/Low DO Pathogens Priority organics Suspended solids Taste, odor and color Turbidity Unknown toxicity MA51-05_2008 Blackstone River Blackstone 5 10.1 11.7 Flow alteration* Metals Nutrients Pathogens pH Priority organics Suspended solids Taste, odor and color Turbidity Unknown toxicity Assessment of Waterbody Segment 1) Adapted from Final Massachusetts Year 2008 Integrated List of Waters (CN 281.1, 12/2008); available at http://www.mass.gov/dep/water/resources/08list2.pdf Category 2 - Attaining some uses; other uses not assessed 2) For additional information on TMDLs and to view reports, see: Category 3 - Insufficient information to make assessments for any use http://www.mass.gov/dep/water/resources/tmdls.htm Category 4a - TMDL is completed 3) For Massachusetts Surface Water Quality Standards, and waterbody classes and uses, see: Category 4c - Impairment not caused by a pollutant http://www.mass.gov/dep/service/regulations/314cmr04.pdf Category 5 - Impaired or threatened for one or more uses and requiring a TMDL Note: The accuracy of mileage and acreage estimates is limited for Page 1 of 4 Thursday, February 25, 2010 waterbodies that serve as or span municipal boundaries Summary of Waterbody Assessment and TMDL Status in Massachusetts
    [Show full text]