DOCSLIB.ORG

Scarica Fascicolo Completo

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Scarica Fascicolo Completo Rivista di diritti comparati Rivista quadrimestrale Anno II – N. 2/2018 DIREZIONE Andrea Buratti (Università di Roma – Tor Vergata) Giuseppe Martinico (Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna) Oreste Pollicino (Università Bocconi) Giorgio Repetto (Università di Perugia) Raffaele Torino (Università Roma Tre) COMITATO SCIENTIFICO Richard Albert (University of Texas), Vittoria Barsotti (Univ. Firenze), Francesco Bilancia (Univ. Chieti- Pescara), Roberto Bin (Univ. Ferrara), Giuseppe Bronzini (Corte di cassazione), Ermanno Calzolaio (Univ. Macerata), Paolo Carrozza (Scuola Sant’Anna, Pisa), Marta Cartabia (Univ. Bicocca, Corte costituzionale), Ginevra Cerrina Feroni (Univ. Firenze), Francesco Cerrone (Univ. Perugia), Roberto Conti (Corte di cassazione), Diego Corapi (Univ. Sapienza, Roma), Barbara De Donno (Luiss “Guido Carli”), Pasquale De Sena (Univ. Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Milano), Giuseppe de Vergottini (Univ. Bologna), Alessandra Di Martino (Univ. Sapienza, Roma), Giuseppe Franco Ferrari (Univ. Bocconi), Tommaso Edoardo Frosini (Univ. Suor Orsola Benincasa), Anna Gamper (Universität Innsbruck), Javier García Roca (Universidad Complutense de Madrid), Michele Graziadei (Univ. Torino), Peter Hay (Emory University), Nicola Lupo (Luiss “Guido Carli”), Elena Malfatti (Univ. Pisa), Francesco S. Marini (Univ. Roma Tor Vergata), Giovanni Marini (Univ. Perugia), Roberto Mastroianni (Univ. Napoli Federico II), Petros Mavroidis (Columbia University, NY; Université de Neuchâtel), Antonello Miranda (Univ. Palermo), Luigi Moccia (Univ. Roma Tre), Laura Montanari, (Univ. Udine), Massimo Papa (Univ. Roma Tor Vergata), Ernst Ulrich Petersmann (European University Institute), Valeria Piccone (Corte di Cassazione), Cesare Pinelli (Univ. Sapienza, Roma), Giovanni Pitruzzella (Univ. Palermo, AGCM), Miguel Poiares Maduro (European University Institute), Marie-Claire Ponthoreau (Université de Bordeaux), Patricia Popelier (University of Antwerp), Paolo Ridola (Univ. Sapienza, Roma), Roberto Romboli (Univ. Pisa), Antonio Ruggeri (Univ. Messina), Alejandro Saiz Arnaiz (Universitat Pompeu Fabra), Roberto Scarciglia (Univ. Trieste), Robert Schütze (Durham University), Francesco Viganò (Univ. Bocconi, Corte costituzionale) REDAZIONE Marco Bassini (Università Bocconi) Antonello Ciervo (Università di Perugia) Giacomo Delledonne (Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna) Claudio Di Maio (Università Roma Tre) Francesco Saitto (La Sapienza - Università di Roma) SOMMARIO Saggi BEKHZOD KODIROV, Reinterpretation of the Scope of the Early Warning System by National Parliaments: Yellow Card against the Revision of the Posted Workers Directive [pp. 4-36] ELENA BELLIARDO, Logica condizionale e poteri decisionali: una introduzione [pp. 37-75] BALÁZS FEKETE, Interpreting the History of Modern Comparative Law: Beyond Descriptive Linearity. The Case of Historical-Comparative Jurisprudence [pp. 76-108] EMANUELE LA ROSA, Libertà di ricerca scientifica come limite all’intervento penale? [pp. 109- 135] GUIDO PANZANO, Power-sharing Executives in Northern Ireland and South Tyrol: Theories, Structures, Practices and Political Stability [pp. 136-184] SILVIA NUZZO, Affinità e divergenze tra lo sfruttamento illecito delle risorse naturali ed il crimine internazionale di saccheggio [pp. 185-209] ALBERTO MARCHESE, La fecondazione post mortem: irriducibile ossimoro o nuova frontiera del biodiritto? [pp. 210-231] Note e commenti ADORACIÓN GALERA VICTORIA, The displacement of social Europe. The Spanish case [pp. 232-258] RICCARDO CABAZZI, Governance economica europea e riforme negli ordinamenti degli Stati membri: spunti di comparazione [pp. 259-287] PIETRO INSOLERA, Mass shootings, culture war e diritto individuale a detenere e portare armi negli U.S.A. Brevi riflessioni sul ruolo della Supreme Court, traendo spunto da un’invettiva del giudice Thomas [pp. 288-305] Recensioni e letture critiche MARCO DANI, Recensione a Alessia-Ottavia Cozzi, Diritti e principi sociali nella Carta dei Diritti Fondamentali dell’Unione Europea: profili costituzionali (Jovene, 2017) [pp. 306-317] ANDREA BURATTI, Between Judicial Activism and Political Cooperation: The Case of the Canadian Supreme Court [pp. 318-325] GIACOMO DELLEDONNE, Le continuità profonde nel costituzionalismo dell’Europa centrale: ragionando su un’opera memorialistica di Sándor Márai [pp. 326-332] Il regolamento relativo alla procedura di valutazione dei contributi pubblicati nella Rivista è pubblicato in coda al presente numero, unitamente alle linee guide etiche. L’elenco dei revisori che hanno partecipato alla procedura di valutazione suddetta è reso disponibile in coda all’ultimo numero pubblicato nel corso dell’anno solare. Editore: Andrea Buratti (Università di Roma “Tor Vergata”), Giuseppe Martinico (Scuola Universitaria Superiore Sant’Anna di Pisa), Oreste Pollicino (Università commerciale “L. Bocconi” - Milano), Giorgio Repetto (Università di Perugia), Raffaele Torino (Università Roma Tre) Coordinatore Editoriale: Serenella Quari Sede: Via Roentgen, 1 – 20136 Milano / Via O. Raimondo, 18 – 00173 Roma ISSN: 2532-6619 Reinterpretation of the Scope of the Early Warning System by National Parliaments: Yellow Card against the Revision of the Posted Workers Directive * Bekhzod Kodirov CONTENTS: 1. Introduction. – 2. The Principle of Subsidiarity and the Early Warning System. – 2.1. The EWS in the EU legal framework. – 2.2. The analyses of the functioning of the EWS in academic literature. – 3. The Monti II Regulation and EPPO Proposal. – 3.1. Yellow card against the Monti II Regulation. – 3.2. The Reaction of National Parliaments to EPPO Proposal. 4. Third Y ellow C ard against the Revision of Posted Workers Directive. – 4.1. The Commission’s Proposal for the revision of the Posted Workers Directive. – 4.2. The reasoned opinions of National Parliaments against the Proposal. – 4.3. The response of the Commission to the reasoned opinions and further developments. – 4.4. National Parliaments and the politics in the revision of the PWD. – 5. Conclusions. 1. Introduction The functioning of the Early Warning System (EWS) so far has demonstrated different and even conflicting approaches of the institutions of the European Union (EU) and National Parliaments (NPs) to the scope and nature of the EWS. In this regard, this paper aims at analyzing how NPs of Member States (MSs) reinterpret the scope of the scrutiny of EU legislative proposals in the framework of the EWS. The strictly formalistic reading of the EWS in the Treaties and the Protocols defines the EWS as a narrow mechanism for the scrutiny of the compliance of the legislative proposals with the subsidiarity principle, the point stressed by the Commission and some scholars.1 * L’articolo è stato sottoposto, in conformità al regolamento della Rivista, a double blind peer review 1 F. Fabbrini and K. Granat, “Yellow Card, But No Foul”: the Role of the National Parliaments under the Subsidiarity Protocol and the Commission Proposal for ISSN 2532-6619 - 4 - N. 2/2018 Bekhzod Kodirov Reinterpretation of the Scope of the Early Warning System by National Parliaments Yellow Card against the Revision of the Posted Workers Directive In contrast, several scholars assert that also the scrutiny of the principle of proportionality in the framework of the EWS is inevitable since the principle of subsidiarity and the principle of proportionality are interlinked and ‘even overlap in some manner’ which makes strict separation of these principles impossible, and due to the necessity of consideration of the principle of proportionality in assessing the efficacy of EU legislation.2 Moreover, according to some authors, the political nature of NPs presupposes the political interpretation of the EWS on the part of NPs who are predisposed to use the EWS as a political instrument to contain competence creep of EU institutions and to protect national constitutional essentials from the adverse effect of EU decision-making.3 The Lisbon Treaty introduced among other novelties the EWS for the subsidiarity monitoring to address ‘democratic deficit’ and ‘democratic disconnect’ problems in European governance. The former problem is characterized by the incapability of the EU decision-making to ensure ‘government of the people, by the people and for the people’.4 The latter is defined as the ‘disconnect’ between the bureaucratic and distant EU governance and the national institutions as the sources of democratic and constitutional legitimacy.5 The subsidiarity is one of the fundamental principles for the Union competences alongside with the principle of conferral and the principle of proportionality, which consider a specific question in the vertical allocation of powers between the EU and the MSs, since the conferral principle asks “can” the EU take a proposed measure, an EU Regulation on the Right to Strike, in Common Market Law Review, vol. 50, 2013, p. 115. 2 S. Gernat, Interpreting Subsidiarity – How to Develop into a Constitutional Principle?, in MaRBLe Research Papers, vol. 4, 2013; K. Borońska- Hryniewiecka, Democratizing the European Multi-level Polity? A (re-) Assessment of the Early Warning System, in Yearbook of Polish European Studies, 2013. 3 M. Goldoni, The Early Warning System and the Monti II Regulation: The Case for a Political Interpretation, in European Constitutional Law Review, vol. 10, p. 90 ss. 4 P. De Wilde, Why the Early Warning Mechanism Does Not Alleviate the Democratic Deficit, in OPAL Online Paper, vol. 6, 2012, p. 6. 5 P.L. Lindseth, Power and Legitimacy: Reconciling Europe and the Nation- State, Oxford,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe Group: Towards an Inevitable Decline? Bruno Marino 22 April 20141
    The Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe Group: Towards an inevitable decline? Bruno Marino 22 April 20141 The Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe Group (from now on, ALDE Group) is the third most numerous group within the European Par- liament, after the European People’s Party group and the Party of European Socialists group. The ALDE group is made up by Members of the European Parliament (from now on, MEPs) coming from two different European par- ties, i.e., the European Democratic Party and the Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe Party. The liberal democratic group2 has had a very interesting historical devel- opment. In the 1960s, after the exit of the Gaullist MEPs, the liberal group formed within the Common Assembly of the European Coal and Steel Com- munity started a long path of change and inclusion of new members as the European integration went on. Analysing the history of the liberal democratic group also means analysing the change of its name. From 1979 until 1985 within the European Parliament, there was the Lib- eral and Democratic Group, in which there were different parties, such as the French UDF, the Italian PRI and PLI, or the German FDP. From 1985 until the mid-1990s, the liberal democratic group changed its name, becoming the Liberal and Democratic Reformist Group. In this period, parties coming from different countries (like the Portuguese Social Democratic Party) joined the group. In 1994, there was another change; the Group of the European Liberal 1 This article was originally published in Italian on the CISE website.
    [Show full text]
  • The European Parliament Elections of 2019
    The European Parliament Elections of 2019 Edited by Lorenzo De Sio Mark Franklin Luana Russo luiss university press The European Parliament Elections of 2019 Edited by Lorenzo De Sio Mark Franklin Luana Russo © 2019 Luiss University Press – Pola Srl All rights reserved ISBN (print) 978-88-6105-411-0 ISBN (ebook) 978-88-6105-424-0 Luiss University Press – Pola s.r.l. viale Romania, 32 00197 Roma tel. 06 85225481/431 www.luissuniversitypress.it e-mail [email protected] Progetto grafico: HaunagDesign Impaginazione: Livia Pierini Questo libro è stato composto in ITC Charter e stampato su carta acid free presso Geca Industrie Grafiche, via Monferrato 54 20098 San Giuliano Milanese, Milano First published in July 2019 Table of contents Introduction Understanding the European Parliament elections of 2019 luana russo, mark franklin, lorenzo de sio .........................................p. 9 part i − comparative overview Chapter One Much ado about nothing? The EP elections in comparative perspective davide angelucci, luca carrieri, mark n. franklin ...............................p. 15 Chapter Two Party system change in EU countries: long-term instability and cleavage restructuring vincenzo emanuele, bruno marino ........................................................p. 29 Chapter Three Spitzenkandidaten 2.0: From experiment to routine in European elections? thomas christiansen, michael shackleton ...........................................p. 43 Chapter Four Explaining the outcome. Second-order factors still matter, but with an exceptional turnout increase lorenzo de sio, luana russo, mark franklin ........................................p. 57 Chapter Five Impact of issues on party performance nicola maggini, lorenzo de sio, diego garzia, alex h. trechsel...........p. 71 part ii − results across the 28 eu countries Austria: An election overshadowed by Ibiza-gate sylvia kritzinger, carolina plescia .......................................................p.
    [Show full text]
  • The European Parliament Elections of 2014 the European Parliament Elections of 2014
    Edited by L. De Sio, V. Emanuele, N. Maggini, | The European Parliament Elections of 2014 The European | Maggini, N. Emanuele, V. De Sio, L. Edited by The European Parliament Elections of 2014 Edited by Lorenzo De Sio Vincenzo Emanuele Nicola Maggini With contributions by Konstantinos Athanasiadis, Marcello Carammia, Luca Carrieri, Matteo Cataldi, Alessandro Chiaramonte, Mikołaj Cześnik, Roberto D’Alimonte, Lorenzo De Sio, Luigi Di Gregorio, Patrick Dumont, Vincenzo Emanuele, Marta Fraile, Vlastimil Havlík, Andrija Henjak, Enrique Hernández, Federica Izzo, David Johann, Raphaël Kies, Michał Kotnarowski, Sylvia Kritzinger, Nina Liljeqvist, Simona Kustec Lipicer, Marco Lisi, Nicola Maggini, Bruno Marino, Roderick Pace, Aldo Paparo, Carolina Plescia, Rocco Polin, Lukas Pukelis, Luana Russo, Michail Schwartz, Sorina Soare, Peter Spáč, Laura Sudulich, Liisa Talving, Federico Vegetti, Tom Verthé, Kristian Voss CISE – Centro Italiano Studi Elettorali Directed by Roberto D’Alimonte, the CISE – Centro Italiano Studi Elettorali (Italian Centre for Electoral Studies) is an inter-university research center established jointly by the LUISS Guido Carli University of Rome and the University of Florence. Its activity focuses on the study of elections and their institutional framework. The CISE carries out a range of research activities with different points of view on the electoral process: from the analysis of individual voting behavior (investigated through an independent, regular series of CATI surveys) to analyses of election results based on aggregate data (also including the study of vote shifts and of electoral geography), to research on electoral systems and their related legislation. The CISE research activity is also carried out through partnerships with other Italian and international scholars, as well as with national and international research centers and research programmes.
    [Show full text]
  • War, Socialism and the Rise of Fascism: an Empirical Exploration*
    War, Socialism and the Rise of Fascism: An Empirical Exploration* Daron Acemoglu Giuseppe De Feo MIT University of Leicester Giacomo De Luca Gianluca Russo Free University of Bozen Universitat Pompeu Fabra University of York June 2021 Abstract The recent ascent of right-wing populist movements in many countries has rekindled interest in under- standing the causes of the rise of Fascism in inter-war years. In this paper, we argue that there was a strong link between the surge of support for the Socialist Party after World War I (WWI) and the sub- sequent emergence of Fascism in Italy. We first develop a source of variation in socialist support across Italian municipalities in the 1919 election based on war casualties from the area. We show that these casu- alties are unrelated to a battery of political, economic and social variables before the war and had a major impact on socialist support (partly because the Socialists were the main anti-war political movement). Our main result is that this boost to socialist support (that is “exogenous” to the prior political leaning of the municipality) led to greater local fascist activity as measured by local party branches and fascist political violence (squadrismo), and to significantly larger vote share of the Fascist Party in the 1921 and 1924 elections. We also provide evidence that landowner associations and greater presence of local elites played an important role in the rise of Fascism. Finally, we find greater likelihood of Jewish deportations in 1943-45 and lower vote share for Christian Democrats after World War II in areas with greater early fascist activity.
    [Show full text]
  • CHAPTER 3: Poles in the Austrian Parliament
    CHAPTER 3: Poles in the Austrian Parliament 1. The Imperial Council The origins of the Austrian parliament can be traced back to the so-called Adjunct Council (Beirath), established during the rule of Maximilian I and Ferdinand I� Only under Maria Theresa did it grow in significance� It was renamed the Council of State in 1760�916 Subsequently, following the Spring of Nations, in 1849, it assumed certain characteristics of a representative body and was renamed the Imperial Council� The basis for this change was established by the March Constitution, octroyed by the Emperor in 1848�917 The creation of the Imperial Council was also predicted in other draft constitutions, �i e� of April 1848 and the so-called Kroměříž draft constitutions of 1849� However, due to their excessively liberal nature and the ongoing revolution, they did not come into effect� We also need to highlight the fact that it is the Spring of Nations that we should consider as the beginning of the Habsburg monarchy’s systemic trans- formations toward constitutionalism in its modern sense� In the literature we can find an established view which posits that the dramatic events of that period ini- tiated the process of systemic transformations in Austria� This view is equivalent to considering this date as the starting point for any discussions on the absolute state’s transformation into a constitutional state� On April 25, 1848, the Constitutional Charter of the Austrian Empire, commonly referred to as the April Constitution, was enacted� Its scope was 916 F� Kasparek, Podręcznik
    [Show full text]
  • Challenges in Constitutional Affairs in the New Term: Taking Stock and Looking Forward
    DIRECTORATE GENERAL FOR INTERNAL POLICIES POLICY DEPARTMENT C: CITIZENS' RIGHTS AND CONSTITUTIONAL AFFAIRS CONSTITUTIONAL AFFAIRS Challenges in constitutional affairs in the new term: taking stock and looking forward Thursday, 6 November 2014 ASP 1G3 Workshop for the AFCO Committee This workshop was requested by the European Parliament's Committee on Constitutional Affairs. AUTHORS Yves Bertoncini Uwe Puetter Olivier Costa Wolfgang Wessel Monica Claes Steve Peers Carlos Closa Montero Luciano Bardi Enrico Calossi Marta Ballesteros David Coen RESPONSIBLE ADMINISTRATOR Mr Petr NOVAK Policy Department C - Citizens' Rights and Constitutional Affairs European Parliament B-1047 Brussels E-mail: [email protected] LINGUISTIC VERSION Original: EN/FR ABOUT THE EDITOR To contact the Policy Department or to subscribe to its newsletter please write to: [email protected] European Parliament, November 2014. © European Union, 2014. DISCLAIMER The opinions expressed in this document are the sole responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the European Parliament. Reproduction and translation for non-commercial purposes are authorized, provided the source is acknowledged and the publisher is given prior notice and sent a copy. Challenges in constitutional affairs in the new term: taking stock and looking forward __________________________________________________________________________________________ Workshop for Committee on Constitutional Affairs CHALLENGES IN CONSTITUTIONAL AFFAIRS
    [Show full text]
  • Intra-Party Politics and Party System Factional Conflict, Cooperation and Fission Within Italian Parties
    UNIVERSITA` DEGLI STUDI DI MILANO Graduate School in Social and Political Sciences Dipartimento di Studi Sociali e Politici Dottorato di ricerca in Studi Politici, ciclo XXIV Tesi di dottorato Intra-party Politics and Party System Factional Conflict, Cooperation and Fission within Italian Parties Settore Scientifico-Disciplinare: SPS/04 Autore: Andrea Ceron Tutor: Prof. Luigi Curini Coordinatore del dottorato: Prof. Marco Giuliani ANNO ACCADEMICO 2010-2011 ii Tutor: Prof. Luigi Curini University of Milan Doctoral Committee Prof. Kenneth Benoit London School of Economics (LSE) Prof. Thomas Konig¨ Mannheim Centre for European Social Research (MZES) Prof. Paolo Martelli University of Milan iii iv Acknowledgements First and foremost I offer my deepest gratitude to my supervisor, Prof. Luigi Curini, who supported me with his expertise throughout my dissertation. I would like to sincerely thank him for his guidance, carried out with patience and respect. He has always been there to discuss any major concern and to help me solving any trouble I faced during the work. His hints and suggestions leaded me to constantly improve my research. Despite his many commitments, prof. Curini has always found a way to supervise my work with accuracy, even when we were several time zones away from each other. Far from any rhetoric, I have really much appreciated his helpfulness. I am also grateful to some other people who gave me suggestions about how to improve the present work. In particular, I would like to thank Prof. Paolo Martelli who devoted time to revising one chapter of the present work, giving me useful ideas to clarify some aspects of the dissertation before writing the final handout.
    [Show full text]