Input from the Netherlands to the Habitat III Preparatory Process
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
MEREPUV Working Paper from Safety Region South Holland South D3.2 SRSHS
MEREPUV Working Paper from Safety Region South Holland South D3.2 SRSHS Approved by Date 1 Content 1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 4 Project MEREPUV ................................................................................................................................ 4 Overall goals of the project ................................................................................................................. 4 Scenarios ............................................................................................................................................. 4 Overall description of methods, process, data collection ................................................................... 4 Affect of the scenarios on other vital functions .................................................................................. 5 Affect on health services ..................................................................................................................... 5 Insight in Cascading effects and consequences for other vital societal functions .............................. 5 2 About power outages in the Netherlands ............................................................................................ 6 Facts about reliability in deliverance of power in the Netherlands .................................................... 6 Facts about incidents of previous power outages ............................................................................. -
Annex 3, Case Study Randstad
RISE Regional Integrated Strategies in Europe Targeted Analysis 2013/2/11 ANNEX 3 Randstad Case Study | 15/7/2012 ESPON 2013 This report presents the final results a Targeted Analysis conducted within the framework of the ESPON 2013 Programme, partly financed by the European Regional Development Fund. The partnership behind the ESPON Programme consists of the EU Commission and the Member States of the EU27, plus Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway and Switzerland. Each partner is represented in the ESPON Monitoring Committee. This report does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the members of the Monitoring Committee. Information on the ESPON Programme and projects can be found on www.espon.eu The web site provides the possibility to download and examine the most recent documents produced by finalised and ongoing ESPON projects. This basic report exists only in an electronic version. © ESPON & University of Birmingham, 2012. Printing, reproduction or quotation is authorised provided the source is acknowledged and a copy is forwarded to the ESPON Coordination Unit in Luxembourg. ESPON 2013 ANNEX 3 Randstad Case Study: The making of Integrative Territorial Strategies in a multi-level and multi-actor policy environment ESPON 2013 List of authors Marjolein Spaans Delft University of Technology – OTB Research Institute for the Built Environment (The Netherlands) Bas Waterhout Delft University of Technology – OTB Research Institute for the Built Environment (The Netherlands) Wil Zonneveld Delft University of Technology – OTB Research Institute for the Built Environment (The Netherlands) 2 ESPON 2013 Table of contents 1.0 Setting the scene for RISE in the Randstad ............................................. 1 1.1 Introduction ...................................................................................... 1 1.2 Governance in the Randstad ........................................................... -
The Netherlands
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 26.2.2019 SWD(2019) 75 final COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT First Flood Risk Mangement Plans - Member State: The Netherlands Accompanying the document REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL on the implementation of the Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC) and the Floods Directive (2007/60/EC) Second River Basin Management Plans First Flood Risk Management Plans {COM(2019) 95 final} - {SWD(2019) 30 final} - {SWD(2019) 31 final} - {SWD(2019) 32 final} - {SWD(2019) 33 final} - {SWD(2019) 34 final} - {SWD(2019) 35 final} - {SWD(2019) 36 final} - {SWD(2019) 37 final} - {SWD(2019) 38 final} - {SWD(2019) 39 final} - {SWD(2019) 40 final} - {SWD(2019) 41 final} - {SWD(2019) 42 final} - {SWD(2019) 43 final} - {SWD(2019) 44 final} - {SWD(2019) 45 final} - {SWD(2019) 46 final} - {SWD(2019) 47 final} - {SWD(2019) 48 final} - {SWD(2019) 49 final} - {SWD(2019) 50 final} - {SWD(2019) 51 final} - {SWD(2019) 52 final} - {SWD(2019) 53 final} - {SWD(2019) 54 final} - {SWD(2019) 55 final} - {SWD(2019) 56 final} - {SWD(2019) 57 final} - {SWD(2019) 58 final} - {SWD(2019) 59 final} - {SWD(2019) 60 final} - {SWD(2019) 61 final} - {SWD(2019) 62 final} - {SWD(2019) 63 final} - {SWD(2019) 64 final} - {SWD(2019) 65 final} - {SWD(2019) 66 final} - {SWD(2019) 67 final} - {SWD(2019) 68 final} - {SWD(2019) 69 final} - {SWD(2019) 70 final} - {SWD(2019) 71 final} - {SWD(2019) 72 final} - {SWD(2019) 73 final} - {SWD(2019) 74 final} - {SWD(2019) 76 final} - {SWD(2019) 77 final} - {SWD(2019) 78 final} - {SWD(2019) 79 final} - {SWD(2019) 80 final} - {SWD(2019) 81 final} - {SWD(2019) 82 final} - {SWD(2019) 83 final} - {SWD(2019) 84 final} EN EN Table of contents Acronyms ................................................................................................................................... -
Startdocument Hoeksche Waard
CONCEPT Startdocument Hoeksche Waard Dit startdocument is samengesteld op basis van gegevens van het Rijk, de provincie en de regio, alsmede gesprekken met partijen in de regio. Dit document is opgesteld als discussiedocument en heeft dan ook als doel om te faciliteren dat het gesprek over dit onderwerp gevoerd kan worden. Ten behoeve van de dialoogtafel d.d. 22 april 2013 Opgesteld door Public Result op verzoek van het SOHW en het Ministerie van BZK / WBI Inleiding De Hoeksche Waard is één van de ‘anticipeerregio’s’ in Nederland: gebieden waar in de toekomst sprake zal zijn van een bevolkingsdaling, ontgroening en vergrijzing. De regio kan zich hier tijdig op voorbereiden en maatregelen treffen om de negatieve gevolgen te keren, als ook de aanwezige kansen te benutten. De regio is zich hier goed van bewust en wil, ondersteund door de provincie en het ministerie van BZK, aan de slag met een voortvarende aanpak. Daarbij speelt niet alleen de toekomstige demografische transitie een rol, maar ook de bezuinigingsopgaven waar de gemeenten voor staan. De Hoeksche Waard bevindt zich, evenals een aantal andere Zuid-Hollandse anticipeerregio’s in een bijzonder positie doordat het onder de rook van de nog steeds groeiende Zuidvleugel van de Randstad is gelegen. De regio is in feite de voortuin van de Stadsregio Rotterdam met 1,2 miljoen inwoners en de Drechtsteden met ruim 260.000 inwoners. Natuurlijk begint de regio niet bij het spreekwoordelijke nulpunt. Er is in de samenwerking tussen de gemeenten en andere partijen al veel bereikt. Zo is een regionale structuurvisie opgesteld door het Samenwerkingsorgaan Hoeksche Waard. -
Coronavirus COVID-19 Outbreak in the EU – Fundamental Rights Implications”
Coronavirus pandemic in the EU – Fundamental Rights Implications Country: The Netherlands Contractor’s name: Art.1, Dutch knowledge centre on discrimination Date: 2 July 2020 DISCLAIMER: This document was commissioned under contract as background material for a comparative report being prepared by the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA) for the project “Coronavirus COVID-19 outbreak in the EU – fundamental rights implications”. The information and views contained in the document do not necessarily reflect the views or the official position of the FRA. The document is made available for transparency and information purposes only and does not constitute legal advice or legal opinion. 1 Measures taken by government/public authorities 1.1 Emergency laws/states of emergency In the Netherlands, regional emergency ordinances (noodverordeningen) have been implemented in the 25 Safety Regions (veiligheidsregio's) on basis of article 39 of the Safety Regions Act (Wet veiligheidsregio’s)1 and article 176 of the Municipality Act (Gemeentewet)2. These emergency ordinances are adopted by the mayor of the central municipality in his or her capacity as chair of the Safety Region without any review by the Municipal Councils (Gemeenteraden). These regional emergency ordinances are separate (each safety region has its own ordinance) but almost identical. The model of these emergency ordinances is drafted by the Ministry of Justice and Security and published by the Safety Council (Veiligheidsberaad) which represents all the Safety Regions. The first model was published on 16 March 2020.3 Subsequently regional emergency ordinances were implemented in all Safety Regions based on this first model. The latest model was published on 12 June 2020.4 Subsequently, on 15 June 2020 in all Safety Regions emergency ordinances based on this latest model took force and are still in force at the end of June. -
Integraal Verstedelijkingsakkoord Zuidelijke Randstad
Integraal Verstedelijkingsakkoord Zuidelijke Randstad Ondergetekenden (hierna verder te noemen ‘partijen’) De minister voor Milieu en Wonen, mevrouw S. van Veldhoven – Van der Meer handelend in de hoedanigheid van bestuursorgaan en als vertegenwoordiger van de Staat der Nederlanden, hierna te noemen: “BZK”; De minister van Infrastructuur en Waterstaat, mevrouw C. van Nieuwenhuizen, handelend in de hoedanigheid van bestuursorgaan en als vertegenwoordiger van de Staat der Nederlanden, hierna te noemen: “IenW”; De provincie Zuid-Holland, rechtsgeldig vertegenwoordigd door de gedeputeerde mevrouw A.L. Koning, gemachtigd door de commissaris van de Koning handelende ter uitvoering van het besluit van Gedeputeerde Staten hierna te noemen: “de Provincie”; De acht gemeenten die samen met de Provincie en de MRDH deel uitmaken van de Verstedelijkingsalliantie: Gemeente Den Haag, op grond van artikel 171 van de Gemeentewet rechtsgeldig vertegenwoordigd door de heer B. Revis; Gemeente Delft, op grond van artikel 171 van de Gemeentewet rechtsgeldig vertegenwoordigd door mevrouw K. Schrederhof; Gemeente Dordrecht, op grond van artikel 171 van de Gemeentewet rechtsgeldig vertegenwoordigd door de heer P.H. Sleeking; Gemeente Leiden, op grond van artikel 171 van de Gemeentewet rechtsgeldig vertegenwoordigd door mevrouw F. Spijker; Gemeente Rotterdam, op grond van artikel 171 van de Gemeentewet rechtsgeldig vertegenwoordigd door mevrouw J. Bokhove; Gemeente Rijswijk, op grond van artikel 171 van de Gemeentewet rechtsgeldig vertegenwoordigd door de heer A.F.M. van de Laar; Gemeente Schiedam, op grond van artikel 171 van de Gemeentewet rechtsgeldig vertegenwoordigd door de heer F.B. Minhas; Gemeente Zoetermeer, op grond van artikel 171 van de Gemeentewet rechtsgeldig vertegenwoordigd door de heer R.C. Paalvast; De Metropoolregio Rotterdam Den Haag, hierna te noemen MRDH, vertegenwoordigd door mevrouw J. -
Policing in the Netherlands
Policing in the Netherlands Policing in the Netherlands Published by Police and Safety Regions Department Ministry of the Interior and Kingdom Relations Postbus 20011 2500 EA Den Haag Tel.: +31 (0)70 426 7551 Internet: www.minbzk.nl Edited by Alexandra Toorman Maris den Engelsman Translated by Translation Department Ministry of Foreign Affairs Production supervised by Information and Communication Department Graphic and Multimedia Services Ministry of the Interior and Kingdom Relations Designed by Lumen Rotterdam (Ab Bol) Copy edited by Chan Blok, Amsterdam Photographs by Harro Meijnen, Algemeen Politieblad KLPD Wiep van Apeldoorn Printed by OBT BV, Den Haag Drukkerij De Bink, Leiden January 2009 95910/3644-GMD11 Contents Foreword 3 2.2.10 Town wardens and special investigating officers 24 1 The Police in Dutch society 7 2.2.11 Voluntary police officers 25 1.1 The police and public safety and 2.2.12 Crisis management, the National security 8 Crisis Centre and the police 26 1.2 Leading role for municipalities 8 2.2.12.1 Crisis management 26 1.3 Core police tasks 8 2.2.12.2 The role of the National Crisis 1.4 Safety regions 9 Centre 26 1.5 Safety and Security Monitor 9 2.2.12.3 Police and crisis management 27 1.6 CCTV 10 2.3 The National Police Services Agency 28 1.7 Community safety partnerships 10 2.3.1 Partners in safety and security for the public and the police 28 2 Organisation of the police 11 2.3.2 Strategic vision 28 2.1 One organisation, twenty-six forces 12 2.3.3 Five operational areas 29 2.1.1 The police: serving two masters -
This Document Contains
This document contains: · The Event Covid-19 risk assessment and risk mitigation plan in accordance with the FEI Policy for Enhanced Competition Safety during the Covid-19 Pandemic · The Event Approved Schedule Given the current covid-19 situation, please note that the FEI’s approval of a Schedule should not be taken as an absolute guarantee that the Event will definitely go ahead. The decision whether the Event can take place must be made by the OC and NF in close consultation with the applicable domestic government and public health authorities. It is the responsibility of each Participant to check the status of the Event prior to planning his/her travel to the Event. Risk assessment for COVID-19 The questions below will enable OCs to review the additional considerations specific to sports, and thus inform their risk assessment of COVID-19 associated with their Event. This will help OCs understand and manage any additional risk from COVID-19. The risk assessment should be reviewed and reassessed regularly during the planning phase and updated immediately prior to the transition to the operational phase, especially in light of the rapidly evolving nature of the outbreak. Reference should be made to the latest technical guidance and situation reports on the WHO website. The risk assessment for COVID-19 associated with the Event must be coordinated and integrated with the host country's national risk assessment for COVID- 19. The person completing the questionnaire should include input from the local public health authorities, consult WHO’s latest technical guidance and ensure that there is an up-to-date evaluation of the epidemiological situation. -
Customer Case Safety Region North Holland North “The Only Solution That Gives Complete Control Over Our Communication Flows, from Start to Finish, Is ZIVVER”
Customer case Safety region North Holland North “The only solution that gives complete control over our communication flows, from start to finish, is ZIVVER” Customer case Safety region North Holland North | 1 CUSTOMER PROFILE The Netherlands consists of 25 safety regions. A safety region is a region in which local authorities and emergency services cooperate in the field of disaster- and crises management. Safety region North Holland North (SRNHN) comprises seventeen municipalities with approximately 644,000 inhabitants in total. The central organisation coordinating the emergency activities includes about six hundred employees. Oliver McLean works as IT Advisor at the Alkmaar headquarters. Oliver McLean IT Advisor Safety region North Holland North (SRNHN) Customer case Safety region North Holland North | 2 CASE “Within our safety region many different organisations work together,” says McLean, IT Advisor at the Safety region North Holland North. “From hospitals, ambulance services and the fire brigade to specialist care providers working with problem youths or families. All these organisations process sensitive personal data. For instance, details of victims, patients, and citizens, but the test reports of the voluntary fire brigade as well.” ElUntil November 2017, each organisation had their own solutions to share these data securely. McLean: “This resulted in a kind of hotchpotch of security measures. Each of these solutions protected a part of the communication, but no single solution offered protection from start to finish. A lot of communication inevitably went by fax, WeTransfer, or a number of other unsecured channels. An unclear and undesirable situation, in particular in view of the new European privacy legislation, the GDPR.” “The only solution that offers complete control over our communication flows, from start to finish, is ZIVVER” The safety region’s CISO examined all available solutions. -
Extra Inzet Voor De Zuidvleugel!
Aan: De minister van Volkshuisvesting, Ruimtelijke Ordening en Milieubeheer Mevrouw prof.dr. J.M. Cramer Postbus 20951 2500 EZ DEN HAAG Onderwerp Briefadvies Zuidvleugel Extra inzet voor de Zuidvleugel! Datum 19 maart 2007 Contactpersoon VROM-raad Tim Zwanikken (projectleider) Geachte mevrouw Cramer, 070 339 26 18 Contactpersoon Hierbij bieden de VROM-raad, de Raad voor Verkeer en Waterstaat en de Raad voor Verkeer Raad voor het Landelijk Gebied u hun gezamenlijke advies aan over het en Waterstaat Wilma Okkerse programma Zuidvleugel. Op 7 november 2006 heeft u, mede namens de 070 351 9629 Ministers van Verkeer en Waterstaat, Landbouw, Natuur en Voedselkwaliteit en de Staatssecretaris van Economische Zaken om dit advies gevraagd. Contactpersoon Raad voor het Landelijk Gebied U heeft de raden verzocht te adviseren over het Zuidvleugelprogramma, in Bas van Leeuwen het bijzonder over de Zuidvleugelbrief. U vraagt daarbij of de raden willen 033 421 7833 bezien in welke mate de maatregelen en plannen uit het programma bijdragen Secretariaat aan het verder ontwikkelen en versterken van het gewenste internationale Joyce Parag 070 351 9625 vestigingsklimaat van de Zuidvleugel van de Randstad. Een toelichting op de adviesaanvraag en totstandkoming van het briefadvies vindt u in de bijlagen. Ons kenmerk RVW 2007/146 De raden erkennen het belang van overheidsinvesteringen in de Zuidvleugel en Bijlagen hebben zich dan ook de afgelopen maanden gebogen over de problemen, maar 3 zeker ook over de kansen van deze regio. Het is de raden duidelijk geworden dat extra rijksinvesteringen in dit gebied noodzakelijk en urgent zijn om de gewenste versterking van de economische concurrentiepositie te bereiken. -
National Climate Adaptation Strategy 2016 (NAS)
Adapting with ambition National Climate Adaptation Strategy 2016 (NAS) December 2016 Background and status This document sets out the Netherlands’ the Environment (RIVM) and the (Dutch Society for Nature Conservation), national climate adaptation strategy. It has Netherlands Environmental Assessment RIONED, Stadswerk, UvW, the Dutch been produced under the responsibility of Agency (PBL). On 15 September 2016, Association of Insurers, VNG, World the Minister for the Environment, acting on proposals were discussed at a consultation Wildlife Fund, Centraal Beheer Achmea, behalf of the Minister of Infrastructure and meeting attended by the Minister for the Amsterdam Rainproof, Atelier Groenblauw, the Environment, the Minister of Health, Environment and senior representatives Bureau Stroming, Bureau ZET, Climate Welfare and Sport, the Minister of of the Association of Provinces of the Adaptation Services, CLM Onderzoek en Economic Affairs, the Minister of Netherlands (IPO), the Association of Advies B.V., De Betekenaar, Deltares, Agriculture, the Minister of Security and Netherlands Municipalities (VNG) and the Movares, HKV – Lijn in Water, Amsterdam Justice, and the Minister of Overseas Trade Association of Regional Water Authorities University of Applied Sciences, CROW, and Development Cooperation. (UvW). A draft version of the NAS was ORG-ID, ProRail, Royal HaskoningDHV, produced with the assistance of external Sweco Nederland B.V., Synergos The National Climate Adaptation Strategy experts in various disciplines. Communicatie, Twynstra Gudde, VisNed, – NAS – is the result of a participative Wageningen University and Research Centre, process involving public sector authorities Several organizations* have made a Alterra, WING, and Zegge & Schrijve. at regional and local level, water significant contribution to the current management authorities, knowledge document. -
Zuidvleugelbrief Nieuw Élan Voor De Zuidvleugel Van De Randstad
Zuidvleugelbrief Kabinetsbesluiten voor de Zuidvleugel van de Randstad Nieuw élan voor de Zuidvleugel van de Randstad Investeren in mensen, kennis en infrastructuur Den Haag, september 2006 Inhoudsopgave 1. INLEIDING ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 3 1.1 PROGRAMMA-AANPAK NOTA RUIMTE .............................................................................................................................4 1.2 RIJKSBESLUITEN......................................................................................................................................................................5 1.3 VERVOLGTRAJECT ..................................................................................................................................................................6 1.4 LEESWIJZER...............................................................................................................................................................................6 2. CONTEXT EN RUIMTELIJKE VISIE.................................................................................................................................... 7 2.1 NATIONAAL STEDELIJK NETWERK RANDSTAD HOLLAND.........................................................................................7 2.2 RUIMTELIJK BEELD ZUIDVLEUGEL.....................................................................................................................................8