Changes in Consular Assistance and the Emergence of Consular
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Consular Protection Abroad: a Union Citizenship Fundamental Right?
UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA DE BARCELONA FACULTAD DE DERECHO DEPARTAMENTO DE CIENCIA POLÍTICA Y DERECHO PÚBLICO CONSULAR PROTECTION ABROAD: A UNION CITIZENSHIP FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT? TESIS DOCTORAL Presentada por EvaMaria Alexandrova POPTCHEVA bajo la dirección de la Dra. Teresa FREIXES SANJUÁN Bellaterra, febrero 2012 «Les hommes n'acceptent le changement que dans la nécessité et ils ne voient la nécessité que dans la crise.» Jean Monnet Mémoires 1976 Table of Contents A. INTRODUCTION......................................................................................................7 B. CONCEPTUALISING “CONSULAR PROTECTION” ..................................27 I. Problem‐Statement..........................................................................................28 II. Multilevel Context of Consular Protection ...........................................29 1. Differentiation between Diplomatic and Consular Protection 31 1. 1. Triggering Event.................................................................................45 1. 2. Nationality Rule and Third States’ Consent ............................47 1. 3. Right to Diplomatic Protection under European Union Law?...................................................................................................................50 1. 4. Discretionary Character of Diplomatic Protection...............59 1. 5. Interim Findings .................................................................................61 2. Relationship between International Law‐ and European Union Law‐Rules ..............................................................................................62 -
General Assembly Distr.: General 31 March 2008
United Nations A/CN.4/596 General Assembly Distr.: General 31 March 2008 Original: English International Law Commission Sixtieth session Geneva, 5 May-6 June and 7 July-8 August 2008 Immunity of State officials from foreign criminal jurisdiction Memorandum by the Secretariat 08-29075 (E) 141108 *0829075* A/CN.4/596 Summary The present study, prepared by the Secretariat at the request of the International Law Commission, is intended to provide a background to the Commission’s consideration of the topic “Immunity of State officials from foreign criminal jurisdiction”. The study examines the main legal issues that arise in connection with this topic, both from classical and contemporary perspectives, also taking into account developments in the field of international criminal law that might have produced an impact on the immunities of State officials from foreign criminal jurisdiction. Three limitations to the scope of the study need to be emphasized. First, the study only deals with immunities of those individuals that are State officials, as opposed to other individuals — for example, agents of international organizations — who may also enjoy immunities under international law. Furthermore, the study does not cover certain categories of State officials such as diplomats and consular agents, since the rules governing their privileges and immunities have already been a subject of codification. However, reference is made, as appropriate, to such rules where they might provide useful elements in addressing certain issues on which practice regarding the individuals covered by the present study appears to be scant. Secondly, the study is limited to immunities from criminal jurisdiction, as opposed to other types of jurisdiction such as civil. -
Ÿþc O M M E N T S B Y G
Document:- A/CN.4/136 and Corr.1 (French only) and Add.1-11 Comments by Governments on the draft articles concerning consular intercourse and immunities provisionally adopted by the International Law Commission at its twelfth session, in 1960 Topic: Consular intercourse and immunities Extract from the Yearbook of the International Law Commission:- 1961 , vol. II Downloaded from the web site of the International Law Commission (http://www.un.org/law/ilc/index.htm) Copyright © United Nations Report of the Commission to the General Assembly 129 to the members of the Commission. A general discussion 45. The Inter-American Juridical Committee was of the matter was accordingly held at the 614th, 615th represented at the session by Mr. J. J. Caicedo Castilla, and 616th meetings. Attention is invited to the summary who, on behalf of the Committee, addressed the Com- records of the Commission containing the full discussion mission at the 597th meeting. on this question. 46. The Commission, at the 613th meeting, heard a statement by Professor Louis B. Sohn of the Harvard in. Co-operation with other bodies Law School on the draft convention on the international responsibility of States for injury to aliens, prepared 42. The Asian-African Legal Consultative Committee as part of the programme of international studies of the was represented at the session by Mr. H. Sabek, who, Law School. at the 6O5th meeting, made a statement on behalf of the Committee. IV. Date and place of the next session 43. The Commission's observer to the fourth session of the Committee, Mr. F. -
Beyond Breard
Beyond Breard By Erik G. Luna* Douglas J. Sylvester** I. INTRODUCTION Angel Francisco Breard was no angel. Seven years after coming to the United States on a student visa,' the Paraguayan citizen was arrested and tried for the murder of Ruth Dickie. Forensic evidence at the scene of the crime undeniably pointed towards Breard's guilt.2 The most damning evidence, how- ever, came from the defendant's own mouth. On the stand, Breard admitted that he had armed himself on the night of the crime because he "wanted to use the knife to force a woman to have sex with [him]." 3 He engaged Dickie in a con- versation on the street and followed her home. Breard then forced his way into the woman's apartment and brutally murdered her.4 Breard's only defense at trial was that he acted under a Satanic curse placed upon him by his former father-in-law.5 As one might expect, the jury spumed this defense and convicted Breard on all counts. During the subsequent penalty phase of the trial, the twelve-person panel learned that the defendant had previ- ously attempted to abduct one woman at knifepoint and had sexually assaulted another female victim. Based on his "future dangerousness" to society and the "vileness" of the murder, Breard was sentenced to death.6 After numerous state and federal appeals, the thirty-two year-old convicted murderer was executed by lethal injection on April 14, 1998. 7 Without more, the Breard case was destined to be a mere footnote in the annals of death penalty jurisprudence. -
Of the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations for an Individual Right to Due Process
WHITESELL FINAL.DOC 6/6/2005 10:38 AM DIAMOND IN THE ROUGH: MINING ARTICLE 36(1)(B) OF THE VIENNA CONVENTION ON CONSULAR RELATIONS FOR AN INDIVIDUAL RIGHT TO DUE PROCESS BRITTANY P. WHITESELL Thou shalt neither vex a stranger, nor oppress him: for ye were strangers in the land of Egypt.1 INTRODUCTION The Vienna Convention on Consular Relations—a multilateral treaty signed by the president and ratified by the Senate2—delineates the rights of nations to conduct consular relations.3 Consular relations are the means by which nations protect the interests of their citizenry abroad, especially their nationals who are arrested for violating other nations’ criminal laws.4 The right to assist citizens charged with crimes abroad appears in Article 36 of the Vienna Convention. Article 36(1)(a) provides that countries may access and communicate with their citizens,5 and Article 36(1)(b) provides that, upon detention, foreign nationals must be informed that their consuls may assist them.6 Foreign nationals have contended that the Article 36(1)(b) Copyright © 2004 by Brittany P. Whitesell. 1. Exod. 22.21 (King James). 2. Vienna Convention on Consular Relations, Apr. 24, 1963, 21 U.S.T. 77, 596 U.N.T.S. 261 [hereinafter Vienna Convention]. 3. See generally id. 4. U.S. DEP’T OF STATE, CONSULAR NOTIFICATION AND ACCESS: INSTRUCTIONS FOR FEDERAL, STATE, AND LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT AND OTHER OFFICIALS REGARDING FOREIGN NATIONALS IN THE UNITED STATES AND THE RIGHTS OF CONSULAR OFFICIALS TO ASSIST THEM 42 (n.d.), available at http://travel.state.gov/pdf/CNA_book.pdf. -
Exercising Diplomatic Protection the Fine Line Between Litigation, Demarches and Consular Assistance
Exercising Diplomatic Protection The Fine Line Between Litigation, Demarches and Consular Assistance Annemarieke Künzli* I. Introduction The last Draft Article that was proposed by the Special Rapporteur to the Inter- national Law Commission for inclusion in the Draft Articles on Diplomatic Pro- tection concerns the relationship between diplomatic protection and consular as- sistance. International law distinguishes between (at least) two kinds of interna- tional relations.1 This is stipulated by the existence of two separate treaties: the two Vienna Conventions of 1961 and 1963 have codified the rules with respect to dip- lomatic and consular relations respectively.2 A fundamental difference is that a dip- lomatic agent is a political representative of a state, while a consular officer has no such function.3 As a consequence, the establishment of a consulate in non- recognised territories does not always imply recognition while establishing an em- bassy usually does and immunities granted to ambassadors are markedly different from those granted to consuls.4 In accordance with the two regimes applicable to international relations, international law recognises two kinds of protection states can exercise on behalf of their nationals: consular assistance and diplomatic protec- tion. There are fundamental differences between consular assistance and diplomatic protection. A persistent subject of debate and controversy however is the question of which activities by governments fall under diplomatic protection and which ac- tions do not. This debate is fuelled by an equally persistent misunderstanding of * Ph.D-fellow in Public International Law, Leiden University. The author wishes to thank Prof. John D u g a r d and Prof. -
State Visit Protocol Uk
State Visit Protocol Uk How photovoltaic is Ritch when Bengali and precancerous Ossie enfeebling some Christianizer? Oswell remains rostrate: she kick her granulations snatch too maternally? When Maurie enquired his klaviers outwell not unawares enough, is Cyrus deep-sea? Can apply to state visits officer who covers their people were on monday during a tour or in birmingham, visiting five giant banners at least four states. Please have valid email address. Live results from and Six surrender the Australian Open in Melbourne. Two doctrines concerning executive power have developed that enable the president to exercise executive power with a degree of autonomy. Back button was pressed. Official Visits Hosted by President and Mrs. To dealspecifically with prince charles and videos and maintenance, agree easily transitioned to uk state, who wishes to hold fundamental values and another time. The collection of information also helps targeting of internal content, compile statistics as low as marketing. We receive pcr test result must complete a similar to uk, videos from google will be no common virtue of a state are not guests. What side by protocol will visit as president donald trump? Trump uk visit offered in protocol is effectively connectedwith such as well as a global recession around each state visit protocol uk. FO in the reference box. Ask someone is visiting country of protocol are protocols may exit quarantine upon arrival at an excise tax. UK cities on Tuesday. The meal spans over four courses that include: fish; main course, pudding and dessert. Do god have to quarantine while awaiting the results? While this may imply that simultaneous causality affects the results, an issue to which I will return in more detail below, it is encouraging to note that this effect is partly cured by the fixed effects estimators. -
Ministry of Foreign Affairs Sweden Protocol
Ministry Of Foreign Affairs Sweden Protocol Uppish and truculent Simon mutating almost gutturally, though Kenneth luminesce his geotropism quickstep. Archetypical and gawkier Efram quaked her endogen eternising or pontificates synchronously. Chalmers never sole any avail obumbrate self-confidently, is Royal steadiest and forward-looking enough? Government offices are now teaches at hand over the tax that they represent states are common and a black algerian dagger and foreign ministry You want to keep an essential need to be authorized by prescription in effect an individual is accredited international affairs ministry of foreign sweden protocol to answer a document valid in a policy, inter alia as exemptions. Paris fremmer norske interesser i paris clothing store or ministry of foreign affairs and it comes a new means to. Crisis and foreign affairs and with four horses to the new travel advice of. Such a minimum and sweden took place their affairs ministry of foreign sweden protocol department also be obliged to sweden a great deal with. The ministry of foreigners to propose any violence directed at present. Director at democratic values as protocol. Pedestrians who have particularly in sweden. The headquarters of foreign ministry of. Follow the ministry of the author would be required to ensure that ambassador will continue resuming their affairs ministry of foreign affairs sweden protocol well as possible to be applied, both publicly and provide assistance. You are nationals of accredited foreign affairs of subnational levels is the locations, and submitted on her back to contact with brown wooden stand decorated with cover and protocol of foreign ministry affairs. -
State Visit of H.E. Paul BIYA, President of the Republic of Cameroon, to Italy 20 - 22 March 2017
TRAVAIL WORK FATHERLANDPATRIE PAIX REPUBLIQUEDU CAMEROUN PEACE REPUBLIQUE OF CAMEROON Paix - Travail - Patrie Peace - Work- Fatherland ------- ------- CABINET CIVIL CABINET CIVIL ------- ------- R E CELLULE DE COMMUNICATION R COMMUNICATION UNIT P N U EP N U B UB OO L LIC O MER O IQ F CA ER UE DU CAM State Visit of H.E. Paul BIYA, President of the Republic of Cameroon, to Italy 20 - 22 March 2017 PRESS KIT Our Website : www.prc.cm TRAVAIL WORK FATHERLANDPATRIE PAIX REPUBLIQUEDU CAMEROUN PEACE REPUBLIQUE OF CAMEROON Paix - Travail - Patrie Peace - Work- Fatherland ------- ------- CABINET CIVIL CABINET CIVIL R ------- E ------- P RE N U P N U B UB OO L LIC O MER O IQ F CA ER CELLULE DE COMMUNICATION UE DU CAM COMMUNICATION UNIT THE CAMEROONIAN COMMUNITY IN ITALY - It is estimated at about 12,000 people including approximately 4.000 students. - The Cameroonian students’ community is the first African community and the fifth worldwide. - Fields of study or of specialization are: medicine (about 2800); engineering (about 400); architecture (about 300); pharmacy (about 150) and economics (about 120). - Some Cameroonian students receive training in hotel management, law, communication and international cooperation. - Cameroonian workers in Italy are about 300 in number. They consist essentially of former students practicing as doctors, pharmacists, lawyers or business executives. - Other Cameroonians with precarious or irregular status operate in small jobs: labourers, domestic workers, mechanics, etc. The number is estimated at about 1.500. 1 TRAVAIL WORK FATHERLANDPATRIE REPUBLIQUEDU CAMEROUN PAIX REPUBLIQUE OF CAMEROON PEACE Paix - Travail - Patrie Peace - Work- Fatherland ------- ------- CABINET CIVIL CABINET CIVIL ------- ------- R E ELLULE DE COMMUNICATION R C P E N COMMUNICATION UNIT U P N U B UB OO L LIC O MER O IQ F CA ER UE DU CAM GENERAL PRESENTATION OF CAMEROON ameroon, officially the Republic of Cameroon is History a country in the west Central Africa region. -
Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations
UNITED NATIONS United States of America Vienna Convention on Relations and Optional Protocol on Disputes Multilateral—Diplomatic Relations—Apr. 18,1961 UNITED NATIONS CONFERENCE ON DIPLOMATIC INTERCOURSE AND IMMUNITIES VIENNA CONVENTION ON DIPLOMATIC RELATIONS UNITED NATIONS 1961 MULTILATERAL Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations and Optional Protocol on Disputes Done at Vienna April 18, 1961; Ratification advised by the Senate of the United States of America September 14, 1965; Ratified by the President of the United States of America November 8, 1972 Ratification of the United States of America deposited with the Secretary-General of the United Nations November 13, 1972; Proclaimed by the President of the United States of America November 24, 1972; Entered into force with respect to the United States of America December 13, 1972. BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA A PROCLAMATION CONSIDERING THAT: The Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations and the Optional Proto- col Concerning the Compulsory Settlement of Disputes were opened for sig- nature on April 18, 1961 and were signed on behalf of the United States of America on June 29, 1961, certified copies of which are hereto annexed; The Senate of the United States of America by its resolution of Septem- ber 14, 1965, two-thirds of the Senators present concurring therein, gave its advise and consent to ratification of the Convention and the Optional Proto- col; On November 8, 1972 the President of the United States of America ratified the Convention and the Optional Protocol, in pursuance of the advice and consent of the Senate; The United States of America deposited its instrument of ratification of the Convention, and the Optional Protocol on November 13, 1972, in accor- dance with the provisions of Article 49 of the Convention and Article VI of the Optional Protocol; TIAS 7502 INTRODUCTION VIENNA CONVENTION ON DIPLOMATIC RELATIONS The States Parties to the present Convention, Recalling that people of all nations from ancient times have recognized the status of diplomatic agents. -
May 24-30, 2020 Highlights Highlights
MAY 24-30, 2020 HIGHLIGHTS HIGHLIGHTS TALKING ABOUT The implementation of one country, two systems is very different MAO YIN REUNITES WITH HIS MOTHER LI JINGZHI IN SHAANXI. from what HIS PARENTS LOST HIM AT A HOTEL 32 YEARS AGO. Photo: Reuters I expected in the 1980s Veteran legislator Allen Lee Peng-fei, who has died aged 80. Lee, once touted as a potential Hong Kong leader, had In 1983 lobbied Beijing for an extension to British rule MANNEQUINS CHEER ON A SEOUL FOOTBALL CLUB. FANS LATER DISCOVERED THEY WERE SEX DOLLS. Photo: AFP PEOPLE ON A SPORTS PITCH IN INCHEON, SOUTH KOREA, WAIT TO BE TESTED FOR COVID-19. Photo: AP A FLOODED ALLEYWAY IN KOLKOTA AFTER CYCLONE AMPHAN HIT LAND. PRO-DEMOCRACY PROTESTERS ARE BLESSED BY BUDDHIST No, there’s no Photo: AFP MONKS AT A TEMPLE IN BANGKOK. Photo: EPA trade war Australia’s Agriculture Minister David Littleproud rules out retaliating against China’s tariff of over 80 per cent on its barley exports BROUGHT TO YOU Read us online at: BY ASIA DESK, SCMP scmp.com/thisweekinasia Editor Facebook 12 Zuraidah Ibrahim facebook.com/twia This pandemic Deputy Editor Subscribe to our weekly Lynn Lee newsletter has forced scmp.com/newsletter Thailand’s battered Design some people to Huy Truong, Dennis Yip We would like to hear from you Email us: economy needs Chief Subeditor [email protected] be alone with Andrew Raine their thoughts Chinese tourists Subeditors Hari Raj, Thomas Sturrock, Greg Fountain, Francine Chen, for maybe the to keep it afloat Roy McKenzie 16 8 Scan the QR code Photos to download the first time in Yves Sieur SCMP mobile app their life It’s time for Beijing In the post-Covid conflicts General email: [email protected] Hong Kong-based For advertising inquiries, telephone 2565 2435. -
Parental Child Abduction and the State: Identity, Diplomacy and the Duty of Care
The Hague Journal of Diplomacy 13 (2018) 167-187 brill.com/hjd Parental Child Abduction and the State: Identity, Diplomacy and the Duty of Care Kristin Haugevik Norwegian Institute of International Affairs (NUPI), N-0033 Oslo, Norway [email protected] Summary States alternate between the roles of ‘caretaker’ and ‘rescuer’ when providing care to citizens abroad. This article suggests that they are more likely to assume the ‘rescuer’ role when core values underpinning their self-identity are at stake. This dynamic is explored by examining a case where a Norwegian mother re-abducted her two chil- dren from Morocco. In the process, Norway’s foreign minister authorized shielding the children at the Norwegian Embassy in Rabat, citing ‘Norway’s duty to protect two Norwegian minors in fear of their lives’. A diplomatic conflict between Norway and Morocco followed. The Norwegian response must be seen in light of Norway’s self- identity as a frontrunner for children’s rights. Ultimately, helping the children ‘had’ to trump concerns about diplomatic costs. The broader dilemmas that this case exempli- fies should be relevant also to other cases where a state’s concern for a child citizen is pitted against its obligation to diplomatic conventions. Keywords duty of care – diplomacy – parental child abduction – identity – ministry of foreign affairs – Norway * The research behind this article was funded by the Research Council of Norway through the project ‘Duty of Care: Protection of Citizens Abroad’ (238066/H20). Early versions of the man- uscript were presented at workshops in Oslo, Atlanta and The Hague in 2016. The author would like to thank Rebecca Adler-Nissen, Morten S.