DOCSLIB.ORG

11-BA-2020 Request to Consider the Following: 1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
11-BA-2020 Request to Consider the Following: 1 BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT REPORT Meeting Date: 9/2/2020 ACTION Fike Property, 4719 N 75th Way, Carport 11-BA-2020 Request to consider the following: 1. Request by owner for a variance to the City of Scottsdale Zoning Ordinance, Section 5.504E.1. pertaining to the required front yard setback for a property with Single-Family Residential (R1-7) zoning located at 4719 N 75th Way. OWNER Joanne Fike and Janice Gibbons (480) 367-3287 APPLICANT CONTACT John DiTullio - Titus Brueckner & Levine (480) 483-9600 LOCATION 4719 N 75th Wy BACKGROUND History The subject site was annexed into the City of Scottsdale in 1961 through Ordinance No. 121 and the City of Scottsdale R1-7 zoning was applied. This property is Lot 128 on the Scottsdale Terrace Unit II subdivision which was platted and recorded with Maricopa County in January of 1958. The existing main structure on the site was permitted and constructed in Maricopa County in 1958. An additional permit was issued for a fence in 1999. Zoning/Development Context The subject site is zoned Single-family Residential (R1-7) and is located at the intersection of E. Highland Avenue and N. 75th Way, surrounded by single-family detached homes as well as attached multi-family dwellings. Board of Adjustment Report | 11-BA-2020 Zoning Ordinance Requirements Pursuant to Section 5.504.E.1. of the City of Scottsdale Zoning Ordinance, pertaining to the required front yard setback: each lot shall have a front yard with a minimum depth of twenty (20) feet. The applicant is requesting a variance of ten (10) feet, which would reduce the required front setback on this parcel from twenty (20) feet to ten (10) feet. Code Enforcement Activity There has been no code enforcement activity as of the writing of this report. Community Input City of Scottsdale hearing postcards were sent to properties within 750 feet of the subject site. As of the writing of this report, staff has received four letters in support of the variance request and zero letters in opposition. Discussion The applicant is proposing a front-loading carport accessed from N. 75th Way as part of a home remodel. A section of the northern most portion of the house will be converted from livable space into an open carport, which is proposed to extend past the front of the house providing enough depth to park two vehicles in tandem. The applicant is requesting a variance of ten (10) feet, to allow the front-loading carport to be located within the front yard. Alternatively, the R1-7 zoning district standards allow side loading carports to be constructed within the front yard, as close as ten (10) feet from the front property line (see interpretation exhibit; Attachment #10). Side loading carports may not encompass more than twenty (20) percent of the front yard setback area, must be structurally integrated with compatible building materials to the main building’s roof, and must be constructed so that a minimum of twenty-five (25) percent of the front side of the carport remains open. VARIANCE CRITERIA ANALYSIS 1. That because of special circumstances applicable to the property including its size, shape, topography, location, or surroundings, the strict application of the zoning ordinance will deprive such property of privileges enjoyed by other property of the same classification in the same zoning district: Applicant Statement: The applicant states that the R1-7 lot is small and in order to provide parking for two cars, a deep front loading carport would need to be constructed utilizing the existing driveway on the north side of the lot. The applicant claims the side load carport option would exceed the twenty (20) percent maximum coverage allowed by the zoning district and the side load carport would not fit the character of the neighborhood, which has front loaded driveways. Page 2 of 5 Board of Adjustment Report | 11-BA-2020 Staff Analysis: The R1-7 zoning district has a minimum lot size of 7,000 square feet. The subject property is approximately 6,400 square feet and is similar in size, shape, and topography to other properties in the Scottsdale Terrace Unit II subdivision. An original carport on the north side of the home was enclosed into interior livable space years ago. A typical carport fits the dimensions of 10 x 18, or 180 square feet. The maximum front yard coverage for a carport in the R1-7 zoning district is twenty (20) percent. The subject property has a front yard of 1,340 square feet; twenty (20) percent of that being 268 square feet. Based on staff analysis, a side load carport could fit within the front yard without exceeding the twenty (20) percent maximum coverage allowed by the zoning district. 2. That the authorization of the variance is necessary for the preservation of privileges and rights enjoyed by other property of the same classification in the same zoning district, and does not constitute a grant of special privileges inconsistent with the limitations upon other properties in the vicinity and zone in which such property is located: Applicant Statement: The applicant states that residents should be able to reinvest and redevelop without significantly altering the existing character or feel of a neighborhood. The applicant states there are homes in the subdivision with shade structure carports extending out within the twenty (20) foot front setback and references the two homes to the north. Staff Analysis: As an alternative to the proposed front-loading carport, the R1-7 zoning district allows for a side loading carport to be located within the twenty (20) foot front setback at a minimum of ten (10) feet from the front property line. Other properties in this subdivision and within the R1-7 zoning district must meet these same standards. The home immediately to the north was issued a building permit in 2005 for a lattice covered porch (see Attachment #9) and the property two lots to the north of the subject parcel was issued a building permit in 1991 for a patio shade (site plan is no longer on file). The referenced structures within the front setback area on those two lots were approved as covered patio areas, which are allowed in the R1-7 district, but they were not shown or approved as carports. Plans submitted now must provide more detail. 3. That the special circumstances applicable to the property were not self-imposed or created by the owner or applicant: Applicant Statement: The applicant states the new owners of the property inherited the lot without the existence of a carport or garage, so they did not create the special circumstances. The applicant believes a carport or garage is a necessary basic improvement given the Arizona climate. Page 3 of 5 Board of Adjustment Report | 11-BA-2020 Staff Analysis: The R1-7 zoning district has a minimum lot size of 7,000 square feet. The subject property is approximately 6,400 square feet and is similar in size, shape, and topography to other properties in the Scottsdale Terrace Unit II subdivision. The R1-7 zoning district standards allow for side loading carports at ten (10) feet from the front property line. 4. That authorization of the variance will not be materially detrimental to persons residing or working in the vicinity, to adjacent property, to the neighborhood or to the public welfare in general: Applicant Statement: The applicant states the carport on the edge of the lot would not materially impact residents or workers in the vicinity and they reference the two neighbors to the north with the covered porch and patio shade. The applicant claims the construction of a carport to allow a second vehicle to be parked on the property will remove parking from the congested street and improve safety and view corridors. Staff Analysis: The carport may not be materially detrimental to the neighborhood or public welfare in general, however the carport could be constructed to meet code as a side load carport and would provide the safety and view corridors as described in the applicant’s statement above. SUMMARY Based on the facts presented by the applicant, the evidence would support a finding that the property may not have special circumstances that would warrant relief from the strict application of the Zoning Ordinance requirements. The size of the property is smaller than the typical 7,000 square foot lot in the R1-7 zoning district, however it is similar in size to other lots in the subdivision. The shape, topography or configuration of the property is not unique and applicable. Further, the applicant’s proposed variance does not appear that it would be detrimental to persons residing or working in the surrounding neighborhood. There are options for covered parking that would not require a variance. However, the decision about whether the criteria have been met is for the Board to make after hearing all the evidence at the hearing. Page 4 of 5 Board of Adjustment Zoning Variance Project Narrative 575-PA-2020, Fike Property, 4719 N. 75th Way, Scottsdale, Arizona Type of variance requested, section(s) of the Zoning Ordinance to be varied: The variance request is for Section 5.504.E.1 of the Scottsdale Zoning Code. The variance request is for a small portion of a new 2-car carport structure to be placed in the front yard 20 foot setback. Please see the Site Plan submitted. The new carport to be built along the side of the property on the northern side is approximately 296 square feet. The square foot portion of the new carport to be extended into the front yard setback is about 115 square feet but the only construction in the setback area will be 2 support posts and a crossbeam roof structure connected into the existing roof and integrated into a new covered porch extension over the front walk from the carport to the front door.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Manufactured Home and Carport, Deck, Shed, and Stairs
    MANUFACTURED HOME, CARPORT, DECK, SHED, & STAIR IN A PARK City of Newberg City Hall ~ P.O. Box 970 ~ 414 E First Street ~ Newberg, OR 97132 ~ Phone: (503) 537-1240 ~ Fax: (503) 537-1272 www.newbergoregon.gov \\ncd-admin\data\WP\COMMON\FormsCD\Bldg Div Forms\Manufactured Home Carport Deck Shed Stair Packet 2012.doc 1-27-21 Page 1 Submitting a Permit SUBMITTAL Permit Application Applications are available online at www.newbergoregon.gov and City Hall. Submit an application for the manufactured home and a separate application for carport, deck, shed and stair. Two Construction Plans Drawn to scale with dimensions. Submit plans for carport, deck, shed, and stair. Plan not required for manufactured home in a park. Plan are required for placement on an individual lot, see page 5 for additional planning requirements. Two Site Plans A bird’s eye view of the lot showing existing and proposed structures, distance to property lines and other buildings, and elevations. See page 3 and 4 for a sample plan and page 5 for requirements. Circle the Space Number on the Park Map and Submit See pages 7-15 for park maps. Setbacks See page 6 for setback requirements. Fees The plan review fee is due at submittal and the remaining fees are due at the time of issuance for the carport, deck, shed and stair application. A fee is not required at submittal for a manufactured home application, instead fees are due at time of issuance. Sample fee brochure online at www.newbergoregon.gov. INSPECTIONS Call (503) 554-7714 for Inspections If the permit holder or the permit holders agent fails to call for a setup inspection or causes the under floor area to be enclosed prior to the setup inspection, the permit holder or the permit holder agent shall remove the skirting prior to obtaining an inspection or hire a certified inspector to perform the set up inspection.
    [Show full text]
  • Solar Carport Portable Light
    Solar Carport Portable Light Solar Carport / Portable light have many application from Gazebo, bus stop, detached carport, outdoor kiosks, comping tents, boats and any remote locations where grid is a challenge. Our Solar Carport / portable light comes with standard and flexible solar panel for curved surface installations. • Our carport / Portable light comes with standard and flexible solar panel for curved surface installations. Our carport light also has the ability for solar scalability enables adding panels for demanding weather conditions. • Using High power LED light source with advanced design to make our carport a super bright luminous efficacy fixture of 130 lumens per watt. • The variable lighting mode function is designed with the advanced microwave motion sensor. • Built in battery, charge and discharge over 1000 times. • The light automatically switches off on at dusk and switches off at dawn. 50% permanent lighting, when motion is detected power turns to 100% • 2 Years warranty on all components. • MC4 plug in connection. • 130 Lumens per watt and IP68 rated SOLAR PORTABLE LIGHTS SOLAR PORTABLE 12W 23.6” / 18W 23.6” / 24W 35.4” / 36W 35.4” / 48W 47.2” 3.6” 3.3” 1 1939 Parker Ct Stone Mountain, GA, 30087 | Toll Free: (800) 316-4716 | www.beyondsolar.net Solar Carport Portable Light Specifications Lithium Beam Model # SKU # Power PV Type Solar Panel Lumens CCT Controller IP Rating Battery Angle AVS-SCL12W 786400 12W MONO 40W 12AH 1500LM 5000K PWM 240° IP67 AVS-SCL18W 786401 18W MONO 50W 16AH 2200LM 5000K PWM 240° IP67 AVS-SCL24W
    [Show full text]
  • RES Det. Garage & Carport
    Door Requirements To distinguish between a detached ga- rage and a storage structure, the width Community and Development of the door is considered. If the door is Residential eight feet or wider, then the structure is Services Department considered a detached garage. If the Detached door is narrower than eight feet in Garage & width, the structure is considered a stor- Building Services Division age building. Parking of motor vehicles is C a r p o r t not permitted in a storage building. 785-309-5715 Planning Division 785-309-5720 GARAGE-Driveway Required www.salina-ks.gov STORAGE SHED-Driveway Not Required Community & Development Services City County Building 300 W. Ash, Room 205 785-309-5715 785-309-5720 BLF-307 12/2017 CARPORT Not an Approved Carport I want to build a detached garage or driveway (concrete, asphalt, gravel or asphalt mil- Applying for a permit: carport. What do I need to know? lings) connection to the existing driveway serving Complete and submit a building permit the property or to an existing alley. In order to lo- Detached garages and carports require a application and include the following cate a garage in a rear yard, the owner must dem- building permit. Please visit Develop- documents / information with your sub- onstrate that there is sufficient side yard width ment Services offices or the City of Sa- mittal: lina website to obtain forms and submit- (minimum 8 ft.) to drive a vehicle around the side 1. Site plan - drawn to scale showing tal checklists for construc- of their dwelling to reach the garage.
    [Show full text]
  • Improvement Codes Building Attributes
    IMPROVEMENT CODES CODE TYPE IMPROVEMENT CODE TYPE IMPROVEMENT CODE TYPE IMPROVEMENT BD1 Light Boat Dock FP Fire Place MAA Main Area Addition or Mobile Home BD2 Medium Boat Dock FP1 Fire Place Class 1 MBH Masonry Boat House BD3 Heavy Boat Dock FP2 Fire Place Class 2 MUB Masonry Utility Building BW Breezeway FUB Metal or Frame Utility Building OB Out Building CA Central Air GA Attached Garage OP Open Porch CH Central Heat GH Greenhouse SP Screen Porch CP1 Carport 1, Wood/Concrete HE Heatalator SPA Spa CP2 Carport 2, Wood/Dirt HO Hoist SPOOL Small Pool CP3 Carport 3, Metal/Dirt HT Hot Tub / Jacuzzi ST Storage (Attached to House) CP4 Carport 4, Under Beach House LPOOL Large Pool STG Storage (Detached from House) CPY Canopy MA Main Area 1 Story SV Salvage DG Detached Garage MA1 Main Area 1.5 Story WD Wood Deck EP Enclosed Porch MA2 Main Area 2 Story XPOOL Extra Large Pool FBH Metal or Frame Boat House MA2.5 Main Area 2.5 Story ELV Dumbwaiter or Elevator MA3 Main Area 3 Story BUILDING ATTRIBUTES CONSTRUCTION STYLE EXTERIOR FINISH FOUNDATION SF-M Single Family Modern BV Brick Veneer CS Concrete Slab SF-C Single Family Conventional WF Wood Frame PB Pier & Beam SF-S Single Family Spanish COMP Composition WPR Wood Piers MF-C Multi Family Conventional ST Stucco WOK Wood Pilings R-CT Recreation - Comp Type CB Concrete Blocks PT Post Tension Concrete L-CM Light Commercial AS Asbestos BW Brick & Wood INTERIOR FINISH SV Stone SR Sheetrock ROOF STYLE SI Sheet Iron PA Panel HP Hip SS Structural Steel WP Wallpaper GA Gable WS Wood Shingle FLOORING CS Composition
    [Show full text]
  • Garage, Carport & Shed Builder
    NEW SHOW COMING IN 2021! A Constructiontion MMagazineagaz Network Brand Spring 2020 www.constructionmagnet.comtitioonnmmaaggnneett.c.comom EXTERIOR COSMETIC & PREMIER FINISHING ISSUE OPTIONS ARE ALL GARAGE DOORS THE SAME? PRODUCT PROFILES: SHEDS CUPOLAS & VENTILATION AS CABINS GGCSB_CVRspring2020.inddCSB_CVRspring2020.indd 1 11/14/20/14/20 111:241:24 AAMM Fight Condensation Without Insulation Stop the Dripping from Condensation Tired of Customers complaining about a dripping roof? Let DripStop solve your condensation problems before they start. DripStop is applied at the time of roll forming • Unmatched Durability Adhesive • Prevents Bird Nesting Issues • Easy to Clean • Maintenance Free • Weather Resistant When condensation occurs, moisture gets stored in the specially designed pockets of the DripStop membrane. Quicker – Easier – Cheaper Than other anti-condensation solutions Circle Reader Service #066 Ask for it from your preferred roof panel supplier www.dripstop.com or call us at: 1-(937) 660-6646 FFULLULL PPAGEAGE AADS.inddDS.indd 2 11/14/20/14/20 110:100:10 AAMM Circle Reader Service #038 FFULLULL PPAGEAGE AADS.inddDS.indd 3 11/14/20/14/20 110:100:10 AAMM 12 CONTENTS Features: 12 Function First Are All Garage Doors The Same? 20 Framing Options 42 Wood Works & Steel Stands 26 Dress It Up 42 Show Highlights Exterior Cosmetic & Finishing Options First Construction Rollforming Show A Success 32 Fit For Living Cabin Options To Think About 46 Product Feature Cupolas & Weathervanes 40 What Do You Need? Construction Rollforming 48 Make
    [Show full text]
  • Architectural Styles/Types
    Architectural Findings Summary of Architectural Trends 1940‐70 National architectural trends are evident within the survey area. The breakdown of mid‐20th‐ century styles and building types in the Architectural Findings section gives more detail about the Dayton metropolitan area’s built environment and its place within national architectural developments. In American Architecture: An Illustrated Encyclopedia, Cyril Harris defines Modern architecture as “A loosely applied term, used since the late 19th century, for buildings, in any of number of styles, in which emphasis in design is placed on functionalism, rationalism, and up‐to‐date methods of construction; in contrast with architectural styles based on historical precedents and traditional ways of building. Often includes Art Deco, Art Moderne, Bauhaus, Contemporary style, International Style, Organic architecture, and Streamline Moderne.” (Harris 217) The debate over traditional styles versus those without historic precedent had been occurring within the architectural community since the late 19th century when Louis Sullivan declared that form should follow function and Frank Lloyd Wright argued for a purely American expression of design that eschewed European influence. In 1940, as America was about to enter the middle decades of the 20th century, architects battled over the merits of traditional versus modern design. Both the traditional Period Revival, or conservative styles, and the early 20th‐century Modern styles lingered into the 1940s. Period revival styles, popular for decades, could still be found on commercial, governmental, institutional, and residential buildings. Among these styles were the Colonial Revival and its multiple variations, the Tudor Revival, and the Neo‐Classical Revival. As the century progressed, the Colonial Revival in particular would remain popular, used as ornament for Cape Cod and Ranch houses, apartment buildings, and commercial buildings.
    [Show full text]
  • Eichler Design Guidelines City of Sunnyvale
    Eichler Design Guidelines City of Sunnyvale Adopted July 28, 2009 This page has been intentionally left blank. City of Sunnyvale Eichler Design Guidelines TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION Why Different Guidelines for Eichlers?............................................... E 5 Intent ............................................................................................. E 5 Applicability ...................................................................................... E 6 When is Design Review Required? .................................................... E 6 2. EICHLER HOMES Special Challenges ..............................................................................E 7 Eichler Home Characteristics ..............................................................E 8 3. DESIGN GUIDELINES 3.1 General Guidelines ................................................................ E 11 3.2 Planning for a Ground Floor Addition .................................... E 13 3.3 Planning for a Second Floor Addition ..................................... E 15 3.4 Planning for an Atrium Cover ................................................. E 17 3.5 Planning for Exterior Improvements ....................................... E 18 3.6 Planning for HVAC Improvements ......................................... E 20 3.7 Planning for a New House ..................................................... E 21 APPENDICES A Eichler Neighborhood Maps ...................................................E 23 B Heritage Resource Districts .....................................................E
    [Show full text]
  • Do I Need a Structural Permit?
    How do I get an inspection? State of Oregon offices Building Codes Division (toll-free) ............ 800-442-7457 Follow these steps: or .......................................................... 503-378-4133 Residential Code Specialist ...................... 503-373-7529 y Call the request line at the building Construction Contractors Board ............... 503-378-4621 Do I need a Better Business Bureau ............................ 503-226-3981 department responsible for your area with at least 24 hours’ notice. Attorney General’s Consumer Hotline: y Portland .................................................... 503-229-5576 When you call to make the Salem ....................................................... 503-378-4320 appointment, have all the details Toll-free .................................................... 877-877-9392 structural (permit number, project address, etc.) available. y If the work was done inside, an adult needs to be at the site for permit? the inspection. Things to do Be an informed consumer. When buying a product or contracting a service, follow these steps: y Call the Building Codes Division or the Construction Contractors Board to $ verify active license and registration. y Call the Better Business Bureau. PermitsProtect.info Safe Homes. Secure Investments. Smart Communities. y Compare prices. y Ask for references and contact them. y Be sure you have a written contract and read it carefully before signing. y Visit PermitsProtect.info for Building Codes Division more tips. 1535 Edgewater St. NW P.O. Box 14470 Salem, OR 97309-0404 440-2672 (1/17/COM) PermitsProtect.info Common questions and key information regarding structural permits When do I need a structural permit? What can I do without a permit? Where do I get a permit? A permit is required to construct, enlarge, A permit is not required for minor repairs Permits are issued by your local building alter, move, or replace any home or related and maintenance.
    [Show full text]
  • Roof Overhang and Building Coverage
    M E M O R A N D U M To: Development Services staff From: Matthew Seubert for Tina Axelrad, Zoning Administrator Date: May 24, 2018 (Revised: 5/14/2020) Re: Denver Zoning Code Clarification — Roof Overhang and Building Coverage Summary This memo provides a written clarification that addresses the following related questions: • At what point is an eave or roof overhang so large that it is considered the roof of a partially enclosed structure? • When does a roof overhang count towards building coverage? In general, and as explained below, a Roof Overhang or Eave that is 3’ or less does not count towards building coverage. A Roof Overhang of 3’ or less may be permitted to encroach into required Setbacks, depending on the zone district and the allowed setback encroachments. A Roof Overhang in excess of 3’ is considered a roof of a Partially Enclosed Structure and counts towards allowed building coverage of the Zone Lot. Discussion – Code Analysis Relevant DZC sections include Sections 4.3.7.4.B.1 and similar provisions in the DZC, Articles 3-9, which specify requirements for setback encroachments. For example, Gutters and Roof Overhangs are permitted to encroach up to 3’ into the Primary and Side Street Setback area in all E Zone Districts, because they are considered minor architectural elements that do not negate the intent of setbacks remaining open to the sky. The Rule of Measurement (ROM) (DZC 13.1.5.13) for Building Coverage, Gross Area of Footprint, states: For purposes of building coverage, ‘gross area of footprint’ shall include: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • KBKG Repair Vs. Capitalization: Improvement Decision Tree
    KBKG Repair vs. Capitalization: Improvement Decision Tree - Final Regulations Considering the appropriate Unit of Property (UOP), does the expenditure (Last Updated 03-20-2015): KBKG expressly disclaims any liability in connection with use of this document or its contents by any third party. Any US tax advice contained herein was not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed under the Internal Revenue Code (IRC) or applicable state or local tax law provisions. This document is for educational purposes only and is not intended, and should not be relied upon, as accounting or tax advice. NATIONWIDE SERVICE | 877.525.4462 | KBKG.COM COPYRIGHT © 2018 KBKG ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. ALLSRV. 8/20/2018 KBKG Building Unit of Property & Major Components Chart updated 05-16-17 This chart was created to help users identify building systems & typical “major components” in real estate assets. Replacing a major component is a capital expenditure while replacing an incidental component can be expensed Fire Protection Gas Distribution Building Structure Land Improvements HVAC System Electrical System Plumbing Systems System Security System System Escalators Elevators • Roof System • Landscaping • Heating System • Service & • Plumbing • Sprinkler System • Building security • Gas piping • Stair and • Elevator Car (membrane, including shrubs, (boilers, furnace, Distribution Fixtures (sinks, (piping, heads, alarms including to/ Handrail • Drive System insulation trees, ground radiators) (panel
    [Show full text]
  • CARPORT INTEGRITY POLICY Arizona State Historic Preservation Office
    CARPORT INTEGRITY POLICY Arizona State Historic Preservation Office Prepared by Jason Fox and R. Brooks Jeffery Preservation Studies University of Arizona Adopted October 2005 Purpose In 2004, the staff of the Arizona State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) and the members of the Arizona Historic Sites Review Committee (HSRC) reviewed the proposed Winterhaven Historic District (Tucson) National Register nomination in which the discussion of integrity was often focused on how the carport, an integral component of ranch style house type, has been modified over the 50+ years of the subdivision. SHPO staff and the HSRC disagreed with the preparers’ evaluation of carport integrity as applied to the proposed Winterhaven Historic District. The preparers were graduate students from a University of Arizona Preservation Studies class under the direction of R. Brooks Jeffery. The preparers took a purist stance that defined criteria for carport integrity as having no modifications to its original form and function. The SHPO staff and the HSRC then recommended that a more thorough study of carports be conducted by the preparers with the purpose of providing a spectrum of options for carport integrity, evaluation criteria, and recommendations to SHPO staff and the HSRC as a policy to guide evaluation of future nominations where the integrity of carports in ranch style house types is at issue. Jason Fox, one of the graduate students in the Preservation Studies program who worked on the original nomination, and Jeffery then completed a draft Carport Integrity Policy for review by SHPO staff and HSRC. The policy presented three scenarios and recommended the third that stated, “All residences with compatible carport garage conversions and compatible enclosures into habitable space are considered contributors.” This policy recommendation was approved for adoption by a unanimous vote by the HSRC in October 2005.
    [Show full text]
  • Article Eight
    ARTICLE NINE Unified Development Code Rev. October 7, 2008 Article Nine – Zoning/Development Standards Table of Contents Page Section 9.01 - Building Design Standards 9-2 Section 9.02 - Off-Street Parking and Loading Requirements 9-8 Section 9.03 - Landscape Requirements 9-16 Section 9.04 - Sign Regulations 9-20 Section 9.05 - Accessory Building and Use Regulations 9-31 Section 9.06 - Fencing Requirements in Residential Zoning Districts 9-33 Section 9.07 - Fencing Requirements in Multi-Family and Non-Residential Districts 9-35 Section 9.08 - Screening Wall Requirements for Multi-Family and Non-Residential Uses 9-36 Section 9.09 - Supplemental Regulations 9-37 • Front Yards 9-37 • Side Yards 9-38 • Special Height Regulations 9-38 • Seasonal/Temporary Uses 9-38 • Fruit/Vegetables Stands 9-39 • Asphalt or Concrete Batching Plants (Temporary) 9-39 • Carnival or Circus (Temporary) 9-40 • Garage Sale 9-41 • Radio, Television, Telecommunication, and Microwave Towers 9-41 • Handicap Accessibility 9-41 • Minimum Dwelling Unit Area 9-41 • Performance Standards 9-42 Section 9.10 - Lighting and Glare Standards 9-43 Section 8.15 - Definitions Section 9.11 - Illustrations 9-66 DRAFT Article Nine – Table of Contents 9-1 ARTICLE NINE Unified Development Code Rev. October 7, 2008 Section 9.01 – Building Design Development Standards A. Exterior Construction Requirements 1. Residential Construction Standards a. SF-LD through 2F: All residential buildings and structures located in the residential districts SF-LD, SF-30 through SF-8.4, and 2F shall be of exterior fire resistant construction having at least eighty percent (80%) of the total exterior walls above grade level and below the first floor plate line, excluding doors and windows, constructed of brick, stone, stucco, or material of equal characteristics as approved by the City in accordance with the City’s building code and fire prevention code.
    [Show full text]