DOCSLIB.ORG

Southwest Michigan Nonmotorized Transportation Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Southwest Michigan Nonmotorized Transportation Plan Michigan Department of Transportation Southwest Michigan Region Nonmotorized Transportation Plan 2020 Berrien, Branch, Calhoun, Cass, Kalamazoo, St. Joseph, and Van Buren Counties, Developed by the Southwest Michigan Planning Commission with funding from the Michigan Department of Transportation, Southwest Michigan Planning Commission Logo, M DOT Logo ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS The following agencies and departments are recognized for their dedication and EXECUTIVE SUMMARY . IV assistance during this project: INTRODUCTION . 1 • Project Overview and Background ...........................1 Battle Creek Area Transportation Study MDOT - Intermodal Policy Division Berrien County Road Department MDOT - Southwest Region • Benefits of Nonmotorized Transportation. .1 Berrien County Parks Department MDOT - Kalamazoo and Marshall Transportation NONMOTORIZED TRANSPORTATION PLANNING . 2 Branch County Road Commission Service Centers • Michigan Department of Transportation (MDOT). .2 Calhoun County Road Commission MDOT - Coloma Business Office • Southwest Michigan ......................................4 Cass County Road Commission Michigan Trails and Greenways Alliance PROJECT METHODOLOGY . 5 Cass County Parks Department Niles-Cass-Buchanan Area Transportation Study Road Commission of Kalamazoo County South Central Michigan Regional Planning Commission • Stakeholder Involvement ..................................5 Kalamazoo County Parks and Recreation St. Joseph County Road Commission • Data Sources and Database Development ....................6 Kalamazoo Area Transportation Study Twin Cities Area Transportation Study SOUTHWEST MICHIGAN OVERVIEW . 7 Michigan Department of Transportation (MDOT) Van Buren County Road Commission FACILITY TYPES . 11 EXISTING FACILITIES . 12 NATIONAL/STATE SIGNIFICANT SYSTEMS . 14 • Regional and Local Systems ..............................17 Southwest Michigan Planning Commission would like to recognize and extend SOUTHWEST MICHIGAN GAP ANALYSIS AND PRIORITIES . 18 special thanks to the following sponsors for their assistance with the County Public • Priority Regional North-South Corridors ......................20 Input meetings: • Priority Regional West-East Corridors .......................20 • Priorities by County .....................................21 MDOT Calhoun County Trailway Alliance • Berrien County .........................................21 St. Joseph Conservation District South Haven Van Buren Convention and Visitors Bureau • Branch County .........................................25 St. Joseph Road Commission South Haven Area Chamber of Commerce Berrien - Strategic Leadership Council Friends of the Kal-Haven Trail • Calhoun County ........................................26 Branch Conservation District Bike Michiana Coalition • Cass County ...........................................27 Bike Friendly Kalamazoo Cass County Conservation District • Kalamazoo County. .28 Kalamazoo Area Transportation Study Melting Mann - Dirt Road Bike Challenge • St. Joseph County ......................................31 Kalamazoo County Parks and Expo Center Heart Smart Events LLC • Van Buren County ......................................32 North Country Trail Association Cass County Parks and Recreation Calhoun County APPENDICIES . 34 • State and Federal Initiatives/Resources .....................34 • Public Meeting Promtional Materials ........................36 • Highlighted Design Considerations .........................39 The Southwest Michigan Planning Commission would also like to extend a special thank you to all of the citizens, • Highlighted MDOT Guidance ..............................41 trail groups and enthusiasts that played such an important role in the development of this plan. Further, the media in • Funding Options. .43 southwest Michigan were a critical partner in promoting meetings and getting the message out about this project. • Resource List ..........................................54 Photos credits on the cover page from left to right: Friends of the Kal Haven Trail, Southwest Michigan Planning Commission, Friends of the Kal Haven Trail Southwest Michigan Planning Commission 376 W. Main St., Ste. 130, Benton Harbor, MI 49022 269-925-1137 www.swmpc.org II III EXECUTIVE SUMMARY INTRODUCTION Nonmotorized transportation, with facilities designed In southwest Michigan, there are currently 568 miles of Project Overview and Background primarily for pedestrians and bicyclists (paved on-road nonmotorized facilities (paved shoulders and Agencies, community leaders, public health officials, shoulders, bike lanes, and shared use paths), is a bike lanes), 176 miles of off-road improved facilities and residents, nonprofits, and businesses are recognizing critical element of an integrated transportation system. 29 miles of off-road unimproved facilities. the benefits of bicycle and pedestrian travel and are A connected regional system of nonmotorized facilities looking for ways to better accommodate people who will help to increase mobility choices, relieve traffic This plan highlights the major gaps in southwest travel this way – whether they do so by choice or congestion, reduce air pollution and fuel consumption, Michigan to achieve a connected region-wide system. by necessity. Nonmotorized transportation includes promote physical activity and healthy lifestyles, and With extensive public participation, desired and planned facilities designed primarily for use by pedestrians and improve quality of life. nonmotorized facilities were solicited and mapped. bicyclists, such as paved shoulders and shared use Regional priority corridors along with local priority routes paths. These facilities provide transportation to both, Many communities in southwest Michigan aspire to were identified for each of the counties. There are five allowing access to goods, services, and activities and provide nonmotorized facilities for their residents and north-south and four west-east priority regional corridors recreation. Users may consider a particular trip to visitors and have been working to establish a connected and many of the local/county priority routes correspond serve both objectives. Nonmotorized transportation regional system. This plan provides a nonmotorized to the regional corridors. The priority corridors and planning is important to help increase mobility choices, transportation system vision for the Michigan routes will help guide MDOT’s investment in the region’s relieve traffic congestion, reduce air pollution and fuel Department of Transportation’s (MDOT) Southwest nonmotorized transportation system. consumption, promote physical activity and healthy Region, which includes Berrien, Branch, Calhoun, Cass, lifestyles, and improve quality of life. This plan and the Kalamazoo, St. Joseph, and Van Buren counties. This For planning and implementation efforts, communities accompanying GIS database were developed in order to plan does not replace local, metropolitan or county should collaborate and coordinate with neighboring continue to support these overall goals and benefits. plans; in fact, it builds and depends upon these local communities, regional planning commissions, plans and initiatives. This plan strives to: metropolitan planning organizations, local road Many organizaitons and communities have adopted agencies, MDOT, and other stakeholders. Nonmotorized • Provide a region-wide vision for a connected system nonmotorized and complete streets plans. These plans projects that are part of or connect with a regional of off-road shared use paths and on-road facilities incorporate nonmotorized elements into planning owned trunklines. This plan will also guide MDOT’s network are often looked upon favorably by funding (paved shoulders/bike lanes); documents, such as recreation plans, transportation investment in the region’s nonmotorized system, such agencies. This plan is a living document that represents as the allocation of Transportation Alternatives Program • Encourage dialogue and more coordinated planning plans, corridor plans, or master plans. These plans the current and desired nonmotorized transportation (TAP) funds. At the local level, this plan provides among state, county, and local entities; and vary in scale from the neighborhood, community or needs in the southwest region. It will need to be county levels. This plan is focused on the regional level, information and resources to assist in identifying and • Enhance partnerships and increase communication updated periodically as facilities are built, other potential specifically MDOT’s Southwest Region, which includes improving priority corridors that serve both local and among state, county, and local agencies regarding connections are found, or when the needs within a Berrien, Branch, Calhoun, Cass, Kalamazoo, St. regional needs within the nonmotorized network. the implementation and operation (construction, community change. Joseph, and Van Buren counties. maintenance, marketing, etc.) of nonmotorized facilities. Benefits of Nonmotorized Transportation MDOT has been supporting nonmotorized planning Nonmotorized transportation (walking and biking) and implementation in southwest Michigan for years. In facilities provide numerous benefits to a community. 2001, MDOT funded the development of a Southwest These include increased mobility options, economic Michigan Nonmotorized Investment Plan. This plan was development, social, environmental, health, and overall intended to guide MDOT’s investment in nonmotorized quality of life. facilities
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Oregon Historic Trails Report Book (1998)
    i ,' o () (\ ô OnBcox HrsroRrc Tnans Rpponr ô o o o. o o o o (--) -,J arJ-- ö o {" , ã. |¡ t I o t o I I r- L L L L L (- Presented by the Oregon Trails Coordinating Council L , May,I998 U (- Compiled by Karen Bassett, Jim Renner, and Joyce White. Copyright @ 1998 Oregon Trails Coordinating Council Salem, Oregon All rights reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Printed in the United States of America. Oregon Historic Trails Report Table of Contents Executive summary 1 Project history 3 Introduction to Oregon's Historic Trails 7 Oregon's National Historic Trails 11 Lewis and Clark National Historic Trail I3 Oregon National Historic Trail. 27 Applegate National Historic Trail .41 Nez Perce National Historic Trail .63 Oregon's Historic Trails 75 Klamath Trail, 19th Century 17 Jedediah Smith Route, 1828 81 Nathaniel Wyeth Route, t83211834 99 Benjamin Bonneville Route, 1 833/1 834 .. 115 Ewing Young Route, 1834/1837 .. t29 V/hitman Mission Route, 184l-1847 . .. t4t Upper Columbia River Route, 1841-1851 .. 167 John Fremont Route, 1843 .. 183 Meek Cutoff, 1845 .. 199 Cutoff to the Barlow Road, 1848-1884 217 Free Emigrant Road, 1853 225 Santiam Wagon Road, 1865-1939 233 General recommendations . 241 Product development guidelines 243 Acknowledgements 241 Lewis & Clark OREGON National Historic Trail, 1804-1806 I I t . .....¡.. ,r la RivaÌ ï L (t ¡ ...--."f Pðiräldton r,i " 'f Route description I (_-- tt |".
    [Show full text]
  • Guidelines for Constructing Local Roads in New York's Adirondack Park Edward J
    5 Guidelines for Constructing Local Roads in New York's Adirondack Park Edward J. Kearney, New York state Department of Transportation, Albany The Adirondack Park in upstate New York contains more than 23 000 phasize that aesthetics and engineering are mutually km2 (9000 rniles2) of public and private lands. Most stote·owned land is dependent and that roads can be built that will be designated by the state constitution to remain "forever wild", and de­ operationally safe and efficient and easier and cheaper velopment of private land is closely controlled by the Adirondack Park to maintain and yet will blend attractively into the sur­ Agency, which is part of the executive branch of the state government and also has jurisdiction over construction of new municipal roads and rounding landscape. Figures 1 and 2 show examples of expansions of existing ones. Guidelines that have been developed for use good construction practices in the park, a11d Figure 3 in lieu of review of individual local road projects by the Adirondack Park shows an example of what should be avoided. Agency are presented and discussed. The guidelines are presented in Many researchers have questioned the applicability seven categories: (a) planning, (b), alignment, (c) cross section, (d) road­ of the American Association of state Highway and bed construction, (e) riding surface, (f) bridges and culverts, and (g) gen­ Transportation Officials (AASHTO) Geometric Design eral construction. Their objective is to ensure that local roads are con­ Guide for Local Roads and streets (!) and Highway De­ structed or reconstructed so that they fit harmoniously into the natural surroundings and impart the feeling of being in a park.
    [Show full text]
  • Dear Sir: I Have Lived for 15 Years in Dolphin Cove with the Ever Growing Disaster That Is Greenwich Avenue and Southfield Avenue
    To: Rosenson, Valerie Subject: The promised roundabout Date: Monday, December 02, 2019 3:22:46 PM Dear Sir: I have lived for 15 years in Dolphin Cove with the ever growing disaster that is Greenwich Avenue and Southfield Avenue. My husband and I have been to several meetings with various city employees who told us Waterside people that we were eventually going to get a roundabout at the intersection of Pulaski, Greenwich and Davenport. Greenwich would become one way south and Davenport one way north. The roundabout would be speedier than the triangle 3 stop signs are today. We were told to be patient. Over and over. Still, you approved, over our objections, 700 new apartments with nary a change in our favor-just far more traffic than could possibly be reasonably handled on top of an already impossible traffic situation. You did not widen Southfield as far as promised, but you did enlarge the corner at Selleck so a turn to Davenport could avoid the still 2direction Greenwich. We felt hope, but since Davenport still hits the Greenwich northbound traffic before the triangle, it really was of no help. But it gave us a glimmer of hope that the plan was progressing. It was planned that with the roundabout both those roads would be merging out of/into the new roundabout which should slightly improve throughput. Now you have stopped the project in its tracks by not allowing Pulaski to be widened so it can be both an entrance and an exit from the roundabout out! So the congestion at Washington will just back up into the triangle or roundabout.
    [Show full text]
  • Great River Road Tennessee
    Great River Road Tennessee Corridor Management Plan Corridor Management Plan Recognitions Mayor AC Wharton Shelby County Byway Consultant Mayor Jeff Huffman Tipton County David L. Dahlquist Mayor Rod Schuh Lauderdale County Governor Phil Bredesen President Mayor Richard Hill Dyer County State of Tennessee David L. Dahlquist Associates, L.L.C. Mayor Macie Roberson Lake County State Capitol 5204 Shriver Avenue Mayor Benny McGuire Obion County Nashville, TN 37243 Des Moines, IA 50312 Commissioner Susan Whitaker Pickering Firm, Inc Department of Tourist Development Byway Planning Team Architecture – Engineering – Planning – Surveying Wm. Snodgrass/Tennessee Tower 312 8th Avenue North, 25th Floor Bob Pitts, PE Nashville, TN 37243 Mississippi River Corridor – Tennessee, Inc. Principal Owner Board of Directors Director, Civil Engineering Services Ms. Marty Marbry 6775 Lenox Center Court – Suite 300 West Tennessee – Tourist Development Memphis, TN 38115 Regional Marketing & Public Relations John Sheahan Chairman/CEO John Threadgill Secretary Historical Consultant Commissioner Gerald Nicely Dr. Carroll Van West Tennessee Department of Transportation Jim Bondurant Chair – Obion - Task Force Committe Director 505 Deaderick St. Rosemary Bridges Chair – Tipton - Task Force Committee Center for Historic Preservation James K. Polk Bldg. – 7th Floor Peter Brown Chair – Dyer - Task Force Committee Middle Tennessee State University Nashville, TN 37243 Laura Holder Tennessee Civil War National Heritage Area P.O. Box 80 – MTSU Pamela Marshall Public Affairs
    [Show full text]
  • Great Lakes Better Backroads Guidebook
    Great Lakes Better Backroads Guidebook Clean Water by Design Great Lakes Drainage Basin September 2007, 3rd Edition Prepared by: 501 Norway Street Grayling, MI 49738 Huron Pines www.huronpines.org Conserving the Forests, Lakes and Streams of Northeast Michigan Good design and maintenance will save $$$ by decreasing road problems and untimely repairs. Great Lakes Better Backroads Guidebook Clean Water by Design September 2007, 3rd Edition Prepared by: 501 Norway Street Grayling, MI 49738 www.huronpines.org Huron Pines Conserving the Forests, Lakes and Streams of Northeast Michigan Huron Pines is a nonprofit 501(c)(3) organization and an equal opportunity employer. The Great Lakes Commission and the USDA provided partial funding for this project. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Many thanks to the Windham Regional Commission, Brattleboro, Vermont and the George D. Aiken & Northern Vermont Resource Conservation and Development Councils for permission to reproduce portions of the Vermont Better Backroads Manual. Special thanks to Melissa M. Reichert, Senior Planner/Landscape Architect, Windham Regional Commission, Brattleboro, Vermont for providing illustrations from the Vermont Better Backroads Manual. Steering Committee for the 3rd Edition: Amy Beyer, Conservation Resource Alliance, Traverse City, MI Duke Domke, Michigan Department of Environmental Quality, Land & Water Management Division, Gaylord, MI Howard Haselschwardt, Northwest Design Group, Petoskey, MI Steve Holden, Michigan Department of Environmental Quality - Water Bureau, Lansing, MI Tyler Kitchel, Michigan Department of Environmental Quality - Water Bureau, Lansing, MI Steve Largent, Grand Traverse Conservation District, Traverse City, MI Keith Noble, Michigan Department of Environmental Quality - Water Bureau, Lansing, MI Daniel Pearson, Michigan Department of Natural Resources, Natural Rivers Program, Gaylord, MI Heather Rawlings, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • SR 20 Discovery Road and SR 20 Kearney Street Roundabouts Pre-Design Study
    SR 20 Discovery Road and SR 20 Kearney Street Roundabouts Pre-Design Study December 2020 Prepared by WSDOT’s Olympic Region Multimodal Planning Office P. O. Box 47440 Olympia, WA 98504-7440 Title VI Notice to Public It is the Washington State Department of Transportation's (WSDOT) policy to ensure no person shall, on the grounds of race, color, national origin or sex, as provided by Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise discriminated against under any of its federally funded programs and activities. Any person who believes his/her Title VI protection has been violated, may file a complaint with WSDOT's Office of Equal Opportunity (OEO). For additional information regarding Title VI complaint procedures and/or information regarding our non-discrimination obligations, please contact OEO's Title VI Coordinator at (360) 705-7090. Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Information Materials can be made available in an alternate format by emailing the Office of Equal Opportunity at [email protected] or by calling toll free, 855-362-4232. Persons who are deaf or hard of hearing may make a request by calling the Washington State Relay at 711. Under 23 U.S. Code § 409, safety data, reports, surveys, schedules, lists compiled or collected for the purpose of identifying, evaluating, or planning the safety enhancement of potential crash sites, hazardous roadway conditions, or railway-highway crossings are not subject to discovery or admitted into evidence in a Federal or State court proceeding or considered for other purposes in any action for damages arising from any occurrence at a location mentioned or addressed in such reports, surveys, schedules, lists, or data.
    [Show full text]
  • Southwest Region Road and Trail Bicycling Guide
    LEGEND BEFORE YOU USE THIS MAP BICYCLING TIPS AND BEST PRACTICES WHERE TO RIDE SOUTHWEST MICHIGAN TRAILS SOUTHWEST MICHIGAN TRAILS Multi-Use Linear Mountain Biking This guide has been developed by the Southwest Rights and Responsibilities On the Road Description Description Southwest Michigan Planning Commission as an aid to bicyclists In general, bicyclists on public roadways have the same rights and responsibilities as motor vehicle drivers and are subject to Bicycles are permitted on all Michigan highways and roads EXCEPT limited Trails Trails and is not intended to be a substitute for a person’s the same state laws and local ordinances. For everyone’s safety, observe these bicycling rules and safety tips. access freeways or unless otherwise posted. Bicycles are allowed on all road More than 26 miles of paved pathway wind through systems including those in state forests, state parks, national forests and Battle Creek Al Sabo Land Seven miles of mountain bike trails go through this land use of reasonable care. The user of this map bears wooded areas, open fields, parks, and some commercial Region Check your Bike Always Wear an Approved Helmet national parks. Linear Trail Preserve preserve. Located near Kalamazoo Valley Community College. full responsibility for his or her safety. The Southwest areas. Historical, cultural, and point of interest signs are www.texastownship.org/about-texas-township/parks- Be sure your brakes work and tires are inflated properly. Always have your helmet fitted and adjusted properly. Helmets Battle Creek Kalamazoo Michigan Planning Commission makes no express or also found along the trail. 269-375-1591 facilities/ Road and Trail Bicycling Guide Use a bell Wear a helmet should fit snugly so they do not move around while riding.
    [Show full text]
  • Deerfoot Trail Study
    Phase 1 June 2016 Deerfoot Trail Online Mapping Tool What We Heard Study Report Table of Contents What we heard and what we asked ............................................................................................ 2 Verbatim Comments .................................................................................................................. 4 Stoney Trail North .................................................................................................................. 4 Country Hills Boulevard .......................................................................................................... 6 96 Avenue N.E. / Airport Trail ................................................................................................. 7 Beddington Trail N.E. ............................................................................................................10 64 Avenue N.E. .....................................................................................................................16 McKnight Boulevard N.E........................................................................................................20 32 Avenue N.E. .....................................................................................................................36 16 Avenue N.E. / Highway 1 ..................................................................................................44 Memorial Drive N.E. ..............................................................................................................49 Blackfoot
    [Show full text]
  • Section J Shorebird Monitoring & Management
    Section J Shorebird Monitoring & Management Duxbury Beach, Duxbury, MA 2017 Beach Nesting Bird Summary Report Prepared by Gabrielle Gareau and Autumn Jorgensen, Mass Audubon Coastal Waterbird Program Photo by Autumn Jorgensen For further information, please contact: Katherine Parsons, Director Sue MacCallum, Director Coastal Waterbird Program South Shore Sanctuaries PO Box 275 2000 Main Street Cummaquid, MA 02637 Marshfield, MA 02050 (503) 362-7475 x9351 (781) 837-9400 [email protected] [email protected] Abstract Monitoring of Duxbury Beach for nesting Piping Plover and Least Tern began on March 21 and continued through August 31, 2017. There were 28 pairs of Piping Plover that had territories at the site but only 27 of these nested. There were a total of 46 nest attempts. Ten nests hatched 28 chicks total and 11 chicks survived to 25 days, the age at which they are considered fledged, for an overall productivity of 0.41. One chick died after 25 days but before fully fledging, so in reality only 10 chicks actually fledged. Least Terns settled into four colonies by late May and there were 113 pairs at the beginning of June. High tides and storm overwash on June 5 caused many pairs to abandon the site; by mid-June only 75 remained and by July fewer than 40. Only a single tern nest survived to hatch, but the 2 chicks were lost within a week. Most egg and chick losses for both species are from predation and overwash, although some Piping Plover chick losses may have been due to exposure during cool, wet weather.
    [Show full text]
  • Select Bd Agenda 08 09 2021
    Littleton Board of Selectmen AGENDA ACTION REQUEST 1 August 9, 2021 Executive Session MGL C.30A,§21(a)(6) - Lease of Real Property – Nagog Orchard Requested by: Town Administrator Action Sought: Discussion/Direction Proposed Motion(s) MOVE that the Select Board vote to enter into Executive Session, pursuant to MGL C.30A,§21(a), clause (6), consider the purchase, exchange, lease or value of real property, since an open meeting may have a detrimental effect on the bargaining position of the Board, and to convene in open session thereafter. [Roll call vote] Additional Information Board will adjourn from Executive Session to Regular Session to continue with remainder of agenda. Board Action Motion Second In favor Opposed Disposition Littleton Select Board AGENDA ACTION REQUEST 2 August 9, 2021 MAIL Requested by: Town Administrator / Assistant Town Administrator Action Sought: None anticipated Proposed Motion(s) None anticipated at this time. Additional Information 1. Letter dated July 14, 2021 from Comcast informing Littleton of new Senior Manager of Government Affairs who will serve as representative to the Town. 2. Letter dated July 16, 2021 from Comcast informing Town of Emergency Connectivity Fund. 3. Letter dated July 21, 2021 from Comcast informing Town of changes to service. 4. Email dated July 30, 2021 from Interim Fire Chief Thomas Clancy regarding new Department of Public Health Mask Advisory. Board Action Motion Second In favor Opposed Disposition {?4 COMCAST July 74, 2021 Board of Selectmen Town of Littleton 37 Shattuck Street Littleton, MA 01460 Re: Comcast Government Alfoits - Contod Chonge Dear Chairman and Members of the Board I am writing to share with you we have welcomed Patrick J.
    [Show full text]
  • Surveymonkey Analyze
    Traffic Relief Pilot Program Feedback Survey - March 2019 SurveyMonkey Q1 Since the start of the Traffic Relief Pilot Program, how much do you support or oppose the Program? Answered: 808 Skipped: 0 60% 50% 49..6% 40% 49.6% 30% 118..3% 115..6% 20% 18.3% 9..9% 6..6% 15.6% 10% 9.9% 6.6% 0% Strongly Somewhat Neither Somewhat Strongly support support support nor oppose oppose oppose ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Strongly support 49.6% 401 Somewhat support 18.3% 148 Neither support nor oppose 6.6% 53 Somewhat oppose 9.9% 80 Strongly oppose 15.6% 126 TOTAL 808 1 / 111 Traffic Relief Pilot Program Feedback Survey - March 2019 SurveyMonkey Q2 In your opinion, has the Traffic Relief Pilot Program reduced cut- through traffic in Foster City? Answered: 794 Skipped: 14 70% 58..11% 60% 58.1% 50% 411..9% 40% 41.9% 30% 20% 10% 0% Yes No ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Yes 58.1% 461 No 41.9% 333 TOTAL 794 2 / 111 Traffic Relief Pilot Program Feedback Survey - March 2019 SurveyMonkey Q3 Would you like to see the Traffic Relief Pilot Program (or left-turn restrictions) continued on a long-term basis? Answered: 804 Skipped: 4 60% 50% 55..7% 55.7% 40% 30% 23..8% 20..5% 23.8% 20% 20.5% 10% 0% Yes No Unsure. Please explain why: ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Yes 55.7% 448 No 20.5% 165 Unsure. Please explain why: 23.8% 191 TOTAL 804 # UNSURE. PLEASE EXPLAIN WHY: DATE 1 Left turn congestion moves towards Safeway parking lot area and into a Foster City Boulevard.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluating the Effectiveness of Best Management Practices on Rural Backroads of Vermont: a Retrospective Assessment and Cost Analysis Joanne S
    University of Vermont ScholarWorks @ UVM Rubenstein School of Environment and Natural Rubenstein School Masters Project Publications Resources 2015 Master's Project: Evaluating the Effectiveness of Best Management Practices on Rural Backroads of Vermont: A Retrospective Assessment and Cost Analysis Joanne S. Garton University of Vermont Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.uvm.edu/rsmpp Part of the Environmental Health and Protection Commons, Environmental Indicators and Impact Assessment Commons, and the Water Resource Management Commons Recommended Citation Garton, Joanne S., "Master's Project: Evaluating the Effectiveness of Best Management Practices on Rural Backroads of Vermont: A Retrospective Assessment and Cost Analysis" (2015). Rubenstein School Masters Project Publications. 3. https://scholarworks.uvm.edu/rsmpp/3 This Project is brought to you for free and open access by the Rubenstein School of Environment and Natural Resources at ScholarWorks @ UVM. It has been accepted for inclusion in Rubenstein School Masters Project Publications by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks @ UVM. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Evaluating the Effectiveness of Best Management Practices on Rural Backroads of Vermont: A Retrospective Assessment and Cost Analysis Final Project Report Prepared for The Vermont Agency of Natural Resources Ecosystem Restoration Program by Joanne Garton, M.Sc. candidate Rubenstein School of Environment and Natural Resources The University of Vermont Updated April 8, 2015 Abstract Repeated erosion of over 7,000 miles of unpaved roads in Vermont is degrading water quality and draining limited town budgets. Best Management Practices (BMPs), including stone-lined ditches, turn outs, check dams, revetments, culverts and vegetative controls, are recommended by the Vermont Department of Transportation as low cost means of reducing the sediment and phosphorous run- off from backroads.
    [Show full text]