Wildlife Research Highlights for 2007
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Consumer Plannlng Section Comprehensive Plannlng Branch
Consumer Plannlng Section Comprehensive Plannlng Branch, Parks Division Texas Parks and Wildlife Department Austin, Texas Texans Outdoors: An Analysis of 1985 Participation in Outdoor Recreation Activities By Kathryn N. Nichols and Andrew P. Goldbloom Under the Direction of James A. Deloney November, 1989 Comprehensive Planning Branch, Parks Division Texas Parks and Wildlife Department 4200 Smith School Road, Austin, Texas 78744 (512) 389-4900 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Conducting a mail survey requires accuracy and timeliness in every single task. Each individualized survey had to be accounted for, both going out and coming back. Each mailing had to meet a strict deadline. The authors are indebted to all the people who worked on this project. The staff of the Comprehensive Planning Branch, Parks Division, deserve special thanks. This dedicated crew signed letters, mailed, remailed, coded, and entered the data of a twenty-page questionnaire that was sent to over twenty-five thousand Texans with over twelve thousand returned completed. Many other Parks Division staff outside the branch volunteered to assist with stuffing and labeling thousands of envelopes as deadlines drew near. We thank the staff of the Information Services Section for their cooperation in providing individualized letters and labels for survey mailings. We also appreciate the dedication of the staff in the mailroom for processing up wards of seventy-five thousand pieces of mail. Lastly, we thank the staff in the print shop for their courteous assistance in reproducing the various documents. Although the above are gratefully acknowledged, they are absolved from any responsibility for any errors or omissions that may have occurred. ii TEXANS OUTDOORS: AN ANALYSIS OF 1985 PARTICIPATION IN OUTDOOR RECREATION ACTIVITIES TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ........................................................................................................... -
United States Department of the Interior National Park Service Land
United States Department of the Interior National Park Service Land & Water Conservation Fund --- Detailed Listing of Grants Grouped by County --- Today's Date: 11/20/2008 Page: 1 Texas - 48 Grant ID & Type Grant Element Title Grant Sponsor Amount Status Date Exp. Date Cong. Element Approved District ANDERSON 396 - XXX D PALESTINE PICNIC AND CAMPING PARK CITY OF PALESTINE $136,086.77 C 8/23/1976 3/1/1979 2 719 - XXX D COMMUNITY FOREST PARK CITY OF PALESTINE $275,500.00 C 8/23/1979 8/31/1985 2 ANDERSON County Total: $411,586.77 County Count: 2 ANDREWS 931 - XXX D ANDREWS MUNICIPAL POOL CITY OF ANDREWS $237,711.00 C 12/6/1984 12/1/1989 19 ANDREWS County Total: $237,711.00 County Count: 1 ANGELINA 19 - XXX C DIBOLL CITY PARK CITY OF DIBOLL $174,500.00 C 10/7/1967 10/1/1971 2 215 - XXX A COUSINS LAND PARK CITY OF LUFKIN $113,406.73 C 8/4/1972 6/1/1973 2 297 - XXX D LUFKIN PARKS IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF LUFKIN $49,945.00 C 11/29/1973 1/1/1977 2 512 - XXX D MORRIS FRANK PARK CITY OF LUFKIN $236,249.00 C 5/20/1977 1/1/1980 2 669 - XXX D OLD ORCHARD PARK CITY OF DIBOLL $235,066.00 C 12/5/1978 12/15/1983 2 770 - XXX D LUFKIN TENNIS IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF LUFKIN $51,211.42 C 6/30/1980 6/1/1985 2 879 - XXX D HUNTINGTON CITY PARK CITY OF HUNTINGTON $35,313.56 C 9/26/1983 9/1/1988 2 ANGELINA County Total: $895,691.71 County Count: 7 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service Land & Water Conservation Fund --- Detailed Listing of Grants Grouped by County --- Today's Date: 11/20/2008 Page: 2 Texas - 48 Grant ID & Type Grant Element Title Grant Sponsor Amount Status Date Exp. -
Natural Agenda a Strategic Plan for Texas Parks and Wildlife Department
FISCAL YEARS 2011–2015 Natural Agenda A Strategic Plan for Texas Parks and Wildlife Department AGENCY STRATEGIC PLAN For Fiscal Years 2011-2015 by the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department Peter M. Holt, Chairman May 9, 2005 – February 1, 2011 San Antonio T. Dan Friedkin, Vice-Chairman May 9, 2005 – February 1, 2011 Houston Mark E. Bivins September 28, 2005 – February 1, 2011 Amarillo Ralph H. Duggins February 19, 2008 – February 1, 2013 Fort Worth Antonio Falcon, M.D. August 14, 2007 – February 1, 2013 Rio Grande City Karen J. Hixon August 14, 2007 – February 1, 2013 San Antonio Dan Allen Hughes, Jr. June 4, 2009 – February 1, 2015 Beeville Margaret Martin February 5, 2009 – February 1, 2015 Boerne S. Reed Morian February 5, 2009 – February 1, 2015 Houston Lee M. Bass, Chairman-Emeritus Submitted July 2, 2010 Signed: ________________________________ Approved: ________________________________ Carter Smith Peter M. Holt Executive Director Chairman Texas Parks and Wildlife Department Texas Parks and Wildlife Commission NATURAL AGENDA | 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Statewide Vision, Mission and Philosophy ................................................................................................................ 2 Relevant Statewide Goals and Benchmarks ................................................................................................................ 3 TPWD Mission and Philosophy ................................................................................................................................. 5 Internal/External Assessment -
Hays County Parks, Recreation and Open Space
T h e S c r i p p s H o w a r d HAYS COUNTY PARKS, RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE SURVEY JULY 2000 815 Brazos Suite 800, Austin, TX 78701 (512) 478-9646; (512) 478-1537 fax TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE SUMMARY…………………………………………………………………….3-7 QUESTIONS……………………..……………………………………………8-16 DEMOGRAPHICS.………………………………………………………….17-18 RESIDENT COMMENTS…………………………………………………. 18-19 METHODOLOGY……..…….…………………………………………………20 ABOUT THE TEXAS POLL/ SCRIPPS DATA CENTER…………………………………………………….20 Page 2 SUMMARY Hays County residents rank river/creek access as the No. 1 public recreational facility need in Hays County, according to a survey conducted by The Scripps Howard Texas Poll. Twenty-eight percent of Hays County residents ranked river/creek access as the No. 1 need. Other needs and the percentage who ranked them No. 1 were: ? Playgrounds (8 percent) ? Picnic tables (3 percent) ? Fishing lakes (8 percent) ? Baseball fields (3 percent) ? Trails (8 percent) ? Softball fields (2 percent) ? Camping sites (7 percent) ? Soccer fields (2 percent) ? Picnic pavilions (5 percent) ? Basketball courts (1 percent) ? Nature study areas (5 percent) ? Volleyball courts (1 percent) ? Bird watching/wildlife sites (4 ? Tennis courts (less than 1 percent) percent) The survey asked residents a variety of questions regarding parks, recreation and open space. The Scripps Howard Texas Poll conducted the survey from April 24 to June 20, mailing 2,000 questionnaires to a random sample of Hays County residents. A total of 943 residents completed and returned the survey - - a 47 percent response rate. County Involvement A majority of Hays County residents support the county acquiring, managing and funding parks, and 71 percent are concerned about growth stripping the county of its rural character. -
2006 Annual Report
WHAT IT TAKES to fulfill our Mission 2006 ANNUAL REPORT ACCOMPLISHING OUR MISSION “to manage and conserve the natural and cultural resources of Texas and to provide hunting, fishing and outdoor recreation opportunities for the use and enjoyment of present and future generations.” The mission of the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department is “to manage and conserve the natural and cultural resources of Texas and to provide hunting, fishing and outdoor recreation opportunities for the use and enjoyment of present and future generations.” Fulfilling such a vital mission for the state of Texas requires a diverse and committed team, with our staff working in every county around the state, The agency’s Land and Water Resources engaged in tasks that range from complex Conservation and Recreation Plan calls for scientific analysis to the most down-to strategic planning and accommodation for earth cleanup duties. It is not enough for us the state’s growing population and simply to maintain the state’s historic consequent increasing demands on our landmarks, fish and wildlife habitats, park natural and cultural resources. So our job headquarters, camping sites, interpretive includes not only maintaining what we have, programs, trails, and the myriad other but also looking toward the future to meet facilities and resources placed under our the goals of that plan. It means mustering our care that inevitably require repair and employees and our science to anticipate and upkeep. We’re responsible for ensuring the mitigate the pressures of population growth safety and viability of outdoor activities on on our natural resources and to continue to public lands and waters, including hunting, provide access to the outdoors for that hiking, fishing, boating and birdwatching. -
American Legion Park Pond
Rainbow Trout Stocking Schedule 2016-2017 Please note stocking dates may be subject to change. Driving directions to most stocking locations are available at http://tpwd.texas.gov/troutstocking Neighborhood Fishin’ ponds (marked with *) will be stocked frequently throughout the season. Water Body Nearest City #trout Dates Hatchery American Legion Park Pond Missouri City 1,400 1/6/2017, 2/3/2017 ETFH Amsler Park McGregor 1,500 12/14/2016, 2/7/2017 AEW Ascarate El Paso 3,000 12/7/2016, 1/11/2017, 2/8/2017, 3/2/2017 AEW Bandera City Park Lake Bandera 578 12/15/2016 AEW Bane Park Lake Houston 1,200 1/13/2017 ETFH Bates Allen Park 2 Rosenberg 1,125 1/3/2017 ETFH Beal Park Lake Midland 1,500 12/6/2016, 1/10/2017, 2/9/2017 PK Bethany Park Pond C Allen 1,700 12/15/2016 TFFC Blanco River - John Knox Wimberley 250 1/14/2016 (open to public 1/14 & 1/15 only) AEW Ranch Blanco State Park #4 Blanco 4,000 12/8/2016, 12/22/2016, 1/13/2017, 2/3/2017 AEW Blue Ridge Park Pond Missouri City 750 1/4/2017 ETFH Bob Sandlin State Park Mt. Pleasant 2,700 12/21/2016, 1/30/2017, 2/23/2017 TFFC Breshears Lake Levelland 900 12/7/2016 PK Buena Vista Park Lake Waco 1,896 11/23/2016, 12/9/2016, 12/14/2016, AEW 12/23/2016, 1/6/2017, 1/20/2017, 2/3/2017, 2/17/2017, 3/3/2017 Buescher State Park Smithville 2,000 12/16/2016, 1/6/2017 AEW Bullfrog Pond Austin 896 11/23/2016, 12/9/2016, 12/23/2016, 1/6/2017, AEW 1/20/2017, 2/3/2017, 2/17/2017, 3/3/2017 Burke-Crenshaw Lake Pasadena 1,000 1/12/2017 ETFH Burroughs Park Conroe 1,200 1/13/2017 ETFH C. -
4 – 19 April 2015
This stunning male Blackburnian Warbler, a recently-arrived migrant, greeted us on the first full day of the 2015 tour. (Glen Davis) TEXAS 4 – 19 APRIL 2015 LEADER: GLEN DAVIS The great state of Texas provides the visitor with a dazzling variety of regions, each with their own habitats and local flavor. Our 17 day tour visited all of these special corners of this, the 2nd largest state in the USA, and with our van, covered 3996.5 miles. That is farther than driving round-trip from London to Moscow. On the other hand, driving from London, Texas to Moscow, Texas only takes 5 hours. The Texas state bird list boasts 649 species of which our 2015 tour recorded an outstanding 313 species! Although Spring migration was a week or two away from reaching full-swing in the region, we managed to find good migrants and specialty species throughout. The first morning was spent aboard Captain Tommy Moore’s boat tour of the salt marshes and waterways of Aransas National Wildlife Refuge. Seeing the majestic Whooping Crane was the main goal and still this prime waterbird area gave us an exciting and fairly comprehensive list. There were many introductions to 1 BirdQuest Tour Report: Texas www.birdquest-tours.com species that we would see more of: Mottled Duck, American White and Brown Pelican, Western Osprey, American Oystercatcher, Black-necked Stilt, Greater and Lesser Yellowlegs, Eastern and Western Willet, Black Skimmer, Laughing Gull, Ring-billed Gull, American Herring Gull, Caspian Tern, Royal Tern, Cabot’s Tern, and Forster’s Tern. Never an afterthought, 21 of the stately and critically endangered cranes were counted as they remained on their winter territory for a few more days. -
Substantive Degree Program Proposal
Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board Proposal for a Doctoral Program Directions: This form requires signatures of (1) the Chief Executive Officer, certifying adequacy of funding for the new program; (2) the Chief Executive Officer, acknowledging agreement to reimburse consultants’ costs; (3) a member of the Board of Regents (or designee), certifying Board of Regents approval for Coordinating Board consideration; or, if applicable, (4) a member of the Board of Regents (or designee), certifying that criteria have been met for Commissioner consideration. Additional information and instructions are available in the Guidelines for Institutions Submitting Proposals for New Doctoral Programs found on the Coordinating Board web site, www.thecb.state.tx.us/newprogramscertificates. Institution officials should also refer to Texas Administrative Code (TAC) 5.46, Criteria for New Doctoral Programs. Note: Institutions should first notify the Coordinating Board of their intent to request the proposed doctoral program before submitting a proposal. Notification may consist of a letter sent to the Assistant Commissioner of Academic Quality and Workforce, stating the title, CIP code, and degree designation of the doctoral program, and the anticipated date of submission of the proposal. Information: Contact the Division of Academic Quality and Workforce at (512) 427-6200. Administrative Information 1. Institution Name and Accountability Group: Texas State University, Doctoral University-Higher Research Activity 2. Program Name: Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) major in Applied Anthropology 3. Proposed CIP Code: CIP Code: 45020100 CIP Code Title: Anthropology CIP Code Definition: A program that focuses on the systematic study of human beings, their antecedents and related primates, and their cultural behavior and institutions, in comparative perspective. -
Project Description
ANALYSIS OF LANDSCAPE CHANGE OF THE RIO VISTA DAM IN SAN MARCOS, TEXAS THESIS Presented to the Graduate Council of Texas State University-San Marcos in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of SCIENCE by Michelle Bussemey San Marcos, Texas May 2007 ANALYSIS OF LANDSCAPE CHANGE OF THE RIO VISTA DAM IN SAN MARCOS, TEXAS Committee Members Approved: _________________________________ David R. Butler, Chair _________________________________ Joanna C. Curran _________________________________ Nathan A. Currit Approved: _______________________________ J. Michael Willoughby Dean of the Graduate College COPYRIGHT by Michelle Bussemey 2007 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would foremost like to thank my advisor David Butler for his insightfulness, criticism, and unending support over the past two years, challenging me to strive for increased knowledge and allowing me to be myself. His enthusiasm and humorous demeanor towards discussing geomorphic topics is quite motivating to want to keep learning more and more. And thanks to him, I will never think of a badger or mushroom again without breaking out into a song and dance. I would also like to thank my committee members, Joanna Curran for introducing me to fluvial processes, encouraging me to seek a Master’s degree, and always willing to talk when I would pop by; and Nate Currit for his insight with GIS and helping me out in tight times. Special thanks to Allison Glass for all her help, patience, and comfort in making sure I maintained sanity and connectedness, and for letting me just unwind in confidence. My sincerest thanks to Carol Sawyer, Mindy Conyers, and Bernadette Marion for guidance, assistance, and mentorship during graduate school, for their words helped reassure me on countless occasions; Brock Brown for always making me feel like I could change the world and achieve greatness (at least in gardening); and to Mark Fonstad for bestowing his wisdom, testing me to think outside the box. -
Inland Fisheries Annual Report 2013
INLAND FISHERIES ANNUAL REPORT 2013 IMPROVING THE QUALITY OF FISHING Carter Smith Gary Saul Executive Director Director, Inland Fisheries INLAND FISHERIES ANNUAL REPORT 2013 TEXAS PARKS AND WILDLIFE DEPARTMENT Commissioners T. Dan Friedkin Chairman, Houston Ralph H. Duggins Vice-Chair, Fort Worth Antonio Falcon, M.D. Rio Grande City James H. Lee Houston Dan Allen Hughes, Jr. Beeville Bill Jones Austin Margaret Martin Boerne S. Reed Morian Houston Dick Scott Wimberley Lee M. Bass Chairman-Emeritus Ft. Worth TABLE OF CONTENTS INLAND FISHERIES OVERVIEW ............................................................. 1 Mission 1 Scope 1 Agency Goals 1 Division Goals 1 Staff 1 Facilities 2 Contact Information 2 Funding and Allocation 3 ADMINISTRATION .................................................................................... 4 HABITAT CONSERVATION ..................................................................... 5 FISHERIES MANAGEMENT AND RESEARCH ..................................... 12 FISH HATCHERIES ................................................................................ 18 ANALYTICAL SERVICES ....................................................................... 19 INFORMATION AND REGULATIONS .................................................... 22 TEXAS FRESHWATER FISHERIES CENTER ....................................... 24 APPENDIX ............................................................................................... 26 Organization Charts 27 Surveys Conducted in Public Waters 35 Stocking Reports -
Sample Outline for Spring Lake Management Plan
Spring Lake Management Plan 1 I. Table of Contents I. TABLE OF CONTENTS .................................................................................................................................... 2 II. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................ 3 A. SIGNIFICANCE OF SPRING LAKE ................................................................................................................................ 3 B. PURPOSE FOR THE SPRING LAKE MANAGEMENT PLAN ................................................................................................. 3 III. SPRING LAKE MANAGEMENT ........................................................................................................................ 4 A. MANAGEMENT GOAL AND OBJECTIVES ..................................................................................................................... 4 B. SPRING LAKE MANAGEMENT .................................................................................................................................. 5 IV. POLICY GUIDELINES ...................................................................................................................................... 6 A. COORDINATION AND MANAGEMENT OF SPRING LAKE ................................................................................................. 6 B. RESEARCH ACTIVITIES IN SPRING LAKE ..................................................................................................................... -
Gonzales Project FERC Project No
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR HYDROPOWER LICENSE Gonzales Project FERC Project No. 2960-006 Texas Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Office of Energy Projects Division of Hydropower Licensing 888 First Street, NE Washington, D.C. 20426 October 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Application .................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Purpose of Action and Need For Power ........................................................ 1 1.2.1 Purpose of Action ............................................................................ 1 1.2.2 Need for Power ................................................................................ 3 1.3 Statutory and Regulatory Requirements ....................................................... 3 1.3.1 Federal Power Act ........................................................................... 3 1.3.2 Clean Water Act .............................................................................. 4 1.3.3 Endangered Species Act .................................................................. 4 1.3.4 Coastal Zone Management Act ....................................................... 4 1.3.5 National Historic Preservation Act .................................................. 5 1.4 Public Review and Comment ........................................................................ 6 1.4.1 Scoping ...........................................................................................