Circulation Package
Area B - Winter Harbour
March 2021 February 17, 2021
Mayors and Regional District Chairs of British Columbia Attendees of January 2021 Regional Calls with Minister Josie Osborne
Dear Mayors and Chairs,
Thank you for taking the time to join Minister Josie Osborne and UBCM President Brian Frenkel for the first round of regional calls in the new year. Hearing from UBCM directly on some of its key interests and issues was very much appreciated. As Minister Osborne and President Frenkel said during the calls, these calls continue to be a great opportunity to hear from you about the key issues and opportunities you are working on in your communities for 2021 (in addition to COVID-19).
There were a number of themes that came up during the calls including connectivity, reopening of BC parks in the spring and roll out of vaccine distribution. This email sets out links and resources on some of the topics raised.
As well, on specific issues such as grant applications or questions particular to your community, please remember that your staff can reach out to Ministry of Municipal Affairs staff for assistance (see the Local Government Division staff finder for the appropriate staff person for your area).
COVID-19 update
The state of emergency is extended to March 2, allowing health and emergency management officials to continue to use extraordinary powers under the Emergency Program Act. On February 5th, Minister Dix and Dr. Henry announced that the province-wide restrictions, put in place to significantly reduce COVID-19 transmission related to social interactions and travel, would continue until further notice based on direction from the PHO.
Although the COVID-19 immunization plan is in effect, Dr. Henry reminded us that gatherings of any size, in our homes or elsewhere, are high risk and non-essential travel should not be happening right now. Please stay tuned for more announcements from Dr. Henry and check the provincial government COVID- 19 website regularly for updates.
Ministry of Municipal Affairs Office of the Mailing Address: Location: Deputy Minister PO Box 9490 Stn Prov Govt 6th Floor, 800 Johnson Street Victoria BC V8W 9N7 Victoria BC V8W 9N7 Phone: 250 387-9108 Fax: 250 387-7973 http://www.gov.bc.ca/mah 1
Mayors and Chairs Page 2
Vaccine distribution
The Provincial Health Officer appreciates the willingness of local governments to support vaccine distribution at the local level and has informed those planning vaccine distribution logistics about the potential for local governments to assist in this regard. The organizers of the immunization roll out recognize the important role that local governments have in this process and are aware that the earlier local governments are involved in the planning, the better the outcomes will be.
Currently, it is planned that vaccinations for the general population will run March to September 2021 and will start in March with people over the age of 80, who will be receiving information in the weeks ahead on when and how to get their vaccinations. The vaccination roll out hinges on vaccine availability and may be subject to change. Immunization clinics are being organized in 172 communities in BC and will be overseen by local health authorities.
The clinics will be held at large centres, including school gyms, arenas, convention halls and community halls. Mobile clinics will be available for some rural communities and for people who are homebound due to mobility issues. More information about the roll out and registration process will be available in late February.
The best source of COVID-19 vaccine information is the BC Centre for Disease Control (BCCDC).
Home Owner Grant Centralization
Effective 2021 all home owner grant applications must be submitted directly to the BC provincial government through a secure online application. Municipalities no longer need to and should not accept any applications. As of February 16, 2021, homeowners can apply for their current year or their retroactive home owner grants online at gov.bc.ca/homeownergrant. Homeowners can find information about this change at gov.bc.ca/homeownergrant or they can call toll free: 1-888-355-2700 to speak with an agent. We encourage you to share this information with your residents. Should you have any questions, please reach out to Kally Khaira, Director, Property Taxation Branch, Ministry of Finance, by phone at 778 698-9536 or email [email protected].
Local Business Support - Launch Online Grant Program
The recently announced new Launch Online Grant Program will provide business owners, including those in hard-hit sectors such as retail, tourism and restaurants, with up to $7,500 to build or strengthen their online store and promote BuyBC at a local, national and international level. The Province is contributing $12 million to support about 1,500 eligible BC businesses to build, maintain and market their products and services online. The grant will pay for up to 75% of eligible expenses up to $7,500 per business to develop or enhance their online store. Applications for this program are now open and businesses can visit launchonline.ca to apply. We encourage you to promote this opportunity directly with your business communities and Chambers of Commerce.
2
Mayors and Chairs Page 3
Strengthening Communities Funding
The Strengthening Communities Funding is a component of the Safe Restart Fund that will provide support to local governments to address the needs of vulnerable populations. This funding program is currently in development. More information will be available in the coming weeks and we will reach out with these details as soon as we can.
Infrastructure Funding
Local governments can access infrastructure funding through a variety of grant programs. If you have questions about local government infrastructure grants, you may also contact the Ministry directly by email at: [email protected]. At this time, intakes are closed and programs are moving into reviews of the applications submitted.
Community Economic Recovery Infrastructure Program (CERIP): The application window for CERIP is closed; notifications will occur in February 2021. If you have any specific questions about this program, contact the Ministry by email at: [email protected]. See https://www2.gov.bc.ca/gov/content/economic- recovery/cerip for more details.
Investing in Canada Infrastructure Program – British Columbia – COVID 19 Resilience Infrastructure Stream (CVRIS): The application window for CVRIS is now closed. Notifications are planned for this Spring. Program details can be found at: www.gov.bc.ca/Investing-in-Canada-Infrastructure-Program
Adaptation, Resilience and Disaster Mitigation Program (ARDM): The application window for ARDM is now closed. Notifications are planned for this Spring. Program details can be found at: www.gov.bc.ca/Investing-in-Canada-Infrastructure-Program. Questions can be emailed to [email protected] .
Infrastructure Planning Grant Program: Intake is open year-round. Local governments can apply for grants that support projects related to the development of sustainable community infrastructure through the Infrastructure Planning Grant Program. The program is open for applications year-round with regular processing deadlines. See https://www2.gov.bc.ca/gov/content/governments/local- governments/grants-transfers/grants/infrastructure-planning-grant-program for more details.
BC Parks
BC Parks is finalizing plans to open camping reservations for the 2021 season. An announcement will be coming soon that will provide details for the upcoming camping season and information related to the Discover Camping reservation service. BC Parks will be working with partners and stakeholders to ensure the season is a safe and successful one.
3
Mayors and Chairs Page 4
Connectivity
Minister Osborne appreciates you raising the issue of connectivity in the recent calls, recognizing that working to connect all people in BC – regardless of where they live – is a priority for our government. The Internet is embedded into all aspects of our day-to-day lives as it enables a broad spectrum of possibilities including healthcare, education, culture, public safety, and economic activity. Providing the same level of access, quality and affordability in rural areas as seen in urban areas is a key priority for the Province.
Provincial connectivity work is led by the Ministry of Citizens’ Services, and Minister Osborne has an upcoming meeting with Minister Lisa Beare on the province’s ongoing work on this file, in conjunction with the federal government.
The next regional calls will be at the end of February and the topic will be on COVID-19 and mental health, as this is a topic that many of you have raised. Minister Osborne will be joined by her colleague, Honourable Sheila Malcolmson, Minister of Mental Health and Addictions, on these calls. Invitations for this meeting were sent February 12, 2021 from Minister Osborne’s office.
As Dr. Henry said recently, we are making progress in our efforts to push back on the COVID-19 virus and get to days of fewer restrictions. We can keep this positive, forward momentum going and help keep our province safe through the small efforts we make every day.
Thank you for your continued leadership and collaboration. Staying connected and supporting one another are still important priorities in these challenging times.
Sincerely,
Okenge Yuma Morisho Tara Faganello, CPA CGA BA Ec. Deputy Minister Assistant Deputy Minister
pc: Chief Administrative Officers Gary MacIsaac, Executive Director, UBCM Nancy Taylor, Executive Director, LGMA Todd Pugh, Executive Directory, CivicInfo
4
February 25, 2021
Greg Fletcher Chief Administrative Officer Regional District of Mount Waddington Box 729 Port McNeill, BC V0N 2R0
Dear Greg Fletcher:
Re: Community Economic Recovery Infrastructure Program – Community Economic Resilience Project # CE0025 - Train Engine Viewing Platform and Infrastructure for Nimpkish Valley Heritage Park
It is my pleasure to provide you with the contribution agreement for the above-named project which has been approved under the Community Economic Reslience stream of the Community Economic Recovery Infrastructure Program (CERIP) to a maximum provincial contribution of $121,650.
Please familizarize yourself with the requirements of the agreement in its entirety. This includes the attached schedules which form part of the agreement and contain important information. As described in Schedule C, your organization is obligated to adhere to various reporting requirements throughout the project.
Please ensure the contribution agreement is circulated to all affected parties and signed by authorized signatories for your organization and that a PDF version of the signed agreement is emailed to [email protected] by March 5, 2021. A copy of the fully signed agreement will be forwarded to you for your office records.
Contracts for this project must be awarded in a way that is transparent, competitive and consistent with value for money principles, and if applicable, in accordance with applicable laws, statutes, and bylaws of British Columbia and, as applicable, Canada and any local government. All contracts for works associated with the project will be publicly tendered. If this is not feasible, approval must be received from the Province of British Columbia in writing before proceeding with the contract.
…/2
Location: Ministry of Municipal Affairs Local Government Infrastructure and Mailing Address: 4th Floor, 800 Finance Branch PO Box 9838 Stn Prov Govt Johnson Street Victoria BC V8W 9T1 Victoria BC V8W 1N3 Phone: 250.387.4060 Fax:250 387-7972 www.gov.bc.ca/mah 5
Page 2
Please ensure all public information material pertaining to the project clearly and prominently indicate that funding for the approved project is provided by the Province of British Columbia under CERIP.
Congratulations, and if you have any questions regarding the above, please contact Ranjit Gill, Program Analyst, at [email protected] or 778-698-3233.
Best regards,
Brian Bedford, Executive Director Local Government Infrastructure and Finance Ministry of Municipal Affairs pc: John Antill, A/Director Local Government Infrastructure & Engineering Ministry of Municipal Affairs
6
March 3, 2021
Graham Anderson Director, Community Energy Initiative Ecotrust Canada 90-425 Carrall Street Vancouver, British Columbia V6B 6E3
Project Title: Exploring community energy financing for the Regional District of Mount Waddington Application Number: GMF 17581
Dear Graham Anderson,
On behalf of the Green Municipal Fund (GMF) Council and FCM’s Executive Committee, I would like to congratulate Ecotrust Canada on its successful funding application for the above-noted initiative.
It is my pleasure to confirm that Ecotrust Canada has been approved for a grant in the amount of up to $79,600.
In the near future, Ms. Chloe McGourdji will contact Ecotrust Canada to finalize the agreement for this funding. FCM’s obligation to fund the above-noted initiative will only become binding once the agreement is signed.
FCM, in partnership with the Government of Canada, oversees public announcements regarding GMF-funded initiatives. In the coming weeks, our media relations team will contact Ecotrust Canada to discuss the process for a public announcement. Until that time, before making any public statements related to the status of the application process for GMF funding (with the exception of reporting to Council), please contact the FCM media team at 613-907-6395 or by email at [email protected].
…/2
7
-2-
Thank you for your interest in GMF. We look forward to working with you to improve the quality of life in your community, and to sharing the results of your initiative with communities across Canada.
Sincerely,
Ben Henderson Chair, Green Municipal Fund Council
BH/CM:cm cc: Greg Fletcher, Chief Administrative Officer – Regional District of Mount Waddington
8 Public Safety and Solicitor General British Columbia News Minister’s statement on Search and Rescue Volunteer Memorial Day https://news.gov.bc.ca/23862
Mike Farnworth, Minister of Public Safety and Solicitor General, has issued the following statement on Search and Rescue Volunteer Memorial Day: “Today, we reflect on the sacrifice and dedication of British Columbia’s search and rescue volunteers – the thousands of hard-working specialists who help those injured or stranded in our province’s backcountry. “B.C.’s search and rescue volunteers are among the best in the world, and I am so proud of the efforts they make to reduce the harm for those in dangerous situations. They deploy to rescue people in need at any time of year, in all conditions, at any hour of day or night. They spend countless hours training to the high standards set by the BC Search and Rescue Association, Royal Canadian Marine Search and Rescue and Provincial Emergency Program (PEP) Air. “With each deployment, these responders risk their own safety. Tragically, some of our best and brightest search and rescue volunteers have lost their lives in the line of duty in years past. To compound the challenges these volunteers face, the last 11 months have been the busiest in the history of B.C.’s search and rescue program. “When COVID-19 was declared a global pandemic in early 2020, we were all challenged to adjust our approaches to daily life to stay safe and healthy. Many people responded by seeking out the beauty of B.C.’s trails and backcountry. “This renewed enthusiasm to explore our wilderness has been heavily felt by B.C.’s 79 ground search and rescue groups and PEP Air teams. These groups normally deploy for approximately 1,700 ground search missions in a year. In the first 11 months of fiscal 2020-21, there were 1,985 incidents – more than any other year in the history of the program, with one month still to come. “Today, I encourage all British Columbians to honour the memory of those who lost their lives trying to save the life of another and the incredible work these skilled responders do to keep us all safe. This can be done in many ways, including visiting the memorial at the Parliament Buildings in Victoria, by taking a moment to reflect on their sacrifice and that of their loved ones and by ensuring we are all as prepared as we can be before heading out into the elements. “On this Search and Rescue Volunteer Memorial Day, I extend my deep gratitude to the thousands of selfless volunteers who put service above self and, in doing so, make British Columbia a safer place to live, work and play.”
9 February 15, 2021
RE: Inter Community Transportation Network and Health Access
North Island MLA, Michele Babchuk; Mid Island – Pacific Rim MLA, Josie Osborne; Courtenay-Comox MLA, Ronna-Rae Leonard; Parksville -Qualicum MLA, Adam Walker 501 Belleville St Victoria, BC V8V 2L8
Dear Central and Northern Vancouver Island MLA’s
We are writing as a network of Community Health Networks in response to the recent suspension of service for the Vancouver Island Connector Bus service, a strong indicator of the vulnerability of the current blended model of private and public intercommunity transportation system on the North and Mid Island.
Community Health Networks (CHN) are community driven networks with a mandate to explore ways to address social determinants of health at a local level. The Community Health Network model builds on regional strengths, incorporating community, decision makers and multidisciplinary teams to move forward on collaborations and projects to increase health equity and work to build healthy resilient communities. There are now CHN’s representing every community on Vancouver Island. A common theme for Community Health Networks in the Central and Northern Island regions is transportation, drawing attention to this issue for the safety of community members and access to basic needs in a geographically large and diverse area of Vancouver Island.
Communities in the Central and Northern regions of Vancouver Island are dependent on reliable transportation services to connect communities, ensuring safety and access to services for rural, remote and First Nation communities. Transportation options in these regions are already disjointed and limited for any individual without access to a car. With the suspension of service for the Island Connector there is no safe alternatives for community members travelling between communities to access health, basic needs and other services.
In light of the COVID-19 pandemic and the realization of challenges we all face, local health networks are playing a vital role in building community resiliency, identifying local priorities and building capacity to assist in solutions. We would like to offer our collective support and social capital from our respective Community Health Networks to the issue of intercommunity transportation services.
We note that in June 2020, after consulting with local government leaders across BC, UBCM brought forward a set of principles and recommendations to the Province of British Columbia for rebuilding public transit in BC. We assert that for rural and remote regions such as the North Island and West Coast
10 of Vancouver Island, the rebuilding of public transportation must consider the challenges and vulnerabilities of our current dependence on private operators to fulfil what is a public need.
We request a meeting with you, as Central and North Island MLAs, to (1) share our knowledge and perspectives, (2) to better understand your government's approach to long-term solutions for intercommunity transportation on the North and Mid Island, and (3) to identify ways we can assist your efforts on this important issue of access and equity in our communities.
Please send your response to this request to Marcie DeWitt, Coordinator for the Alberni Clayoquot Health Network [email protected] for meeting coordination.
Best Regards
Lindsay McGinn, Coordinator Comox Valley Community Health Network
Libby King, Coordinator Angela Smith, Coordinator Strathcona Community Health Network Mount Waddington Community Health Network
Marcie DeWitt, Coordinator Alberni Clayoquot Health Network
CC: Mount Waddington Regional District, Strathcona Regional District, Comox Valley Regional District, Alberni Clayoquot Regional District, Regional District of Nanaimo
11 From: Lam, John W.
Hi Greg,
Thanks for the opportunity to discuss your workplace’s REGIONAL DISTRICT OF MOUNT WADDINGTON (employer ID 164375) current COVID-19 strategy. This is an extraordinary situation that we all find ourselves facing and it is important that we work together to keep BC’s workplaces safe and healthy for everyone. I appreciate you taking the time to meet in support of this effort.
On December 17, the PHO issued a Workplace Safety order that includes a number of requirements for all employers, including:
• Employers must review their COVID-19 Safety Plan to ensure that the plan adequately protects workers from the risk of COVID-19 transmission in the workplace and is consistent with WorkSafeBC requirements. Our Reviewing and updating your COVID-19 safety plan: A guide for employers resource may be helpful for employers in reviewing their plans. • Employers must ensure that workers are prohibited from entering the workplace if they have symptoms of COVID-19 or have had a potential exposure through a health check. • Employers must encourage workers to work from their private residence wherever possible, unless there is a preference on the part of the worker or the employer for the worker to work at the workplace. • COVID-19 Safety Plans must include measures to prevent workers from congregating or crowding in indoor common areas, such as elevators, lobbies, hallways, stairwells, corridors, bathrooms, meeting rooms, break rooms, and kitchens.
Masks must be worn in indoor public places. Employers are expected to provide signage on the mandatory mask policy that was issued by the November 24 order of the Minister of Public Safety and Solicitor General
As discussed in the consultation, the objective of the meeting was to:
• ensure that you review and update the COVID-19 safety plan for your workplace • review and highlight parts of this order that are applicable to your type of business • share information on resources and tools that may provide further assistance and guidance to you
Here are some resources that may be of value to you in addressing the COVID-19 risk in your workplace:
• WorkSafeBC resource on reviewing and updating your plan • PHO order on health checks (resource on what employers and workers need to do) • Revised Entry-check poster for workers and Entry-check poster for visitors • Mandatory masks in workplaces: November 19 PHO order
12 • BC Municipal Safety Association – COVID-19 resources specific to Local Government • BC Municipal Safety Association – Psychological Support Toolkit for Workers & Employers: COVID-19
Information about the COVID-19 virus is changing rapidly. It is important that as relevant new information emerges, employers re-assess the risk to their workers and the controls implemented in the workplace. Checking WorkSafeBC’s COVID-19 webpage regularly or subscribing to WorkSafeBC’s e-newsletter can help you stay current on updates and new resources.
In the coming days and weeks you may have additional questions or thoughts about COVID-19 in the workplace, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
John W. Lam Occupational Health & Safety Consultant Prevention, Programs & Performance Dept. Prevention Services Division | Cell: 604.312.0925 6951 Westminster Hwy, Richmond, BC
13 NIgtl Súaff Report
DATE: February 22,2021 FILE: 9-FD
TO: President ancl Directors/Membcrs Supported by Russell Dyson Corporation Board Administration / Committee Secretary
FROM: Russell Dyson R. Dvsoru Secrctary
RE: Adoptlon ofNorth Ieland 9-1-l Ftre Dlepatch Advisory Commlttee Terme of Refcrcnce
Puqpoee Thc objective of thc Fire Dispatch Advisory Committec is to provide the North Island 9-1-1 Corporation (NII 911 Coqp) Adminisuation Committee, and the Fire Dispatch Manager, with feedback and recommcndations regarding fìre dispatch operations and scrviccs
Recommendation from the Secretary THA,T the attachcd Tcrms of Reference be adoptcd.
Executlve Summary The Fire Dispatch Advisory Committee represcnts the fire departments from all seven Regional Districts served by NI 911 Coqp. The Committcc is comprised of an appointcd chair andlce-chair according to the Terms of Reference as adoptcd by the Committee.
The Terms of Rcference have tecendy been rcvised by the Committee to include the following change:
1. Selection of Commlttee Chair, Vice-Chair, and Secretary Thc Committee Chair, and Vice-Chair, shall be selected and appointed by the Committce rcpresentatives. The appointmcnts of Committee Chair and Vice-Chait shall be revicwcd by thc Committee every 24 months. The Sectetary shall be selcctcd by the Committce Chair or Vice Chair.
Prepared by:
S, Bnnunn Stephanie Bremcr Manager of Firc Administration
February 26,2021 NI 9-1-1 A,dmin Agenda Page 56 of59 14 Background/Current Situation The Fire Dispatch Advisory Committee was crcated in early 20Qg andthis is the fourth rcvision of the Tcrms of Reference. Thc Committee meets at lcast two rimes a yeú and advises the Fire Dispatch Manager on all aspects of firc dispatch operations.
The committee is cwrendy comprised of wo chicf officers from each rcgional- disuict with selection determincd the Fire chiefs Association found within a rcgional districr
Alberni- Clayoquot \ùües Patterson - Deputy Chief Ciry of Port Alberni FD (AltcrnatQ Rick Geddes Ucluelet Fire Departmcnt Comox Valley Firc Chief Gord Shreincr - Comox Fire Department (Chair) (Altcrnatc) Fire Chicf Tcrry Hoffart - Ship's Point FD Mt. Waddington Patrick Donaghy - Mount Waddington RD (AlternatQ Fire Chief Brcnr Borg- Port Hardy FD Nanaimo Fitc Chicf Nick Âcciavatti - Dashwood Fire Dcpartment (Altcrnatc) Fire Chief Marc Nonis -Parksvillc Firc Department Powell River Fire Chicf Dave Kiever - Malaspina Fire Rescue (Alternatc) Jim Brown - Northside Fire Depanmcnt Suathcona Firc Chicf Thomas Dohcrty - Campbell Rivcr Firc Department (AltcrnatQ Fire Chief Brucc Green - Oyster Rivcr Fire Deparrmenr Peace River Fire Chicf Darrell Blades - Fort St. Joh Fire Depanment (Alternate) Fke Chief Edward Albury - Charlie Lake FD
Financial Factore There are telcphone conference bridgc and hospitality costs attached to meetings.
Legal Factors There are no legal factors affecting this topic.
Intetgovernmental Factorg The terms of reference have been dcveloped by fire dcpartment members representing the six regional districts sen¡ed by NI 9-1-1 Coqp.
North lsland 9-7-I
Fcbruary 26,2027 NI 9-1-1 Admin Agenda Page 57 of 59 15 NIgtl
CommÍttee Terms of Reførence
(Adopted by Notth Island 9-1-1 Coqporation Board of Dircctors)
Purpoee The objective of the Fire Dispatch Advisory Committec is to provide the North Island 9-1-1 Corporation (NI 9-1-1 Coqp) Administration Committee and the Fire Dispatch Managcr with feedback and recommendations regarding both the operational and adminisrrative delivery of fue clispatch services.
Advieory Gommittee Representation The committee's membership shall include one representative and alternate from each of the regional disuicts that make up thc Nomh Island 9-1-1 Corporarion.
Selection of the primary and alternatc representatives shall be dctcrmincd as follows:
1. bv the Fire Chiefs Association found wirhin a regional districr, or 2, by the regional fire or cmcrgency protective ser'¿ices coordinator, or 3, by the NI 9-1-1 Corpot¿tion Administration representativc for the given regional district
Disputes regarding committee rcprcsentativest selection will be forwarded to the NI 9-1-1 Corporation Administration rcprescntative for the given regional disuict.
Selection of Committee Chair, Vice-Chair, and Secretary The Committee Chair, and Vicc-Chair, shall be selected and appointed by the Committcc reptesentatives. Thc appointments of Committee Chair and Vicc-Chair shall be reviewed by the Committee every 24 months. The Secretary may be requcstccl by the Committee Chair or Vice Chair.
Role of the Committee Chalr, Vice-Chair, and Secretary Thc Committcc Chair and in their absence, the Vicc-Chair reptesents and stecrs the Committee as a wholc. Thc Committee Sectetary supports the committee administratively and rccords the minutes of all mccdngs. The meeting minutes and rccommendations are to be forwardcd to NI 9-1-1 Corp Administration for distribution.
Role of the Flre Dlspatch Manager The fire dispatch manager acts as a liaison between the NI 9-1-1 Coqp and the Committee Chair and provides administrative, opcrational, and technical advice to the Commitree as a whole.
Role of North Island 9-l-1 Corporation ..Adminietration."
770 Harmeton Avonue, Courtenay, B.C, VgN 0G8 Telephone:250-334-6000 . FaxNo:250-334-4358 TOLL FREE: 1-800-331-6007
February 26,2027 NI 9-1-1 Admin Agenda Page 58 of 59 16 9qa¡ )
The NI 9-1-1 Corp "Adminisuation" will receive all mecting minutes and recommcndations genetatecl by the Fire Dispatch Advisory Committee. Through the Fire Dispatch Manager, rhe "Administration" will review all tecommendations, monitor thc implementation process, and provide support âs necessary.
Thc NI 9-1-1 Corp Corpotate Secretary will receive, consider and respond to all requests submittcd by the Chair of the Fire Dispatch Advisory Committee rcgatding participation in NI 9-1-1 Coqp Administration Committee and Board of Dircctor Meerings.
Implementation of Recommendatione The Committce Chair and the Fire Dispatch Manager will'work collaboratively to implement all recommend¿tions made by the Committee th¿t fall within the Fire Dispatch Manager's scope of authority. Any recommendations that fall outsidc of the scope of authority of the Fire Dispatch Managet, or arc not supported by the Fire Dispatch Manager, 'will be presentcd to the NI 9-1-1 Corp "Adminisuationt' for consideration.
Code ofConduct All participants of the Comrnittee will endeavour ro: . Support an open and inclusive process r Treat others with courtesy and respecr . Speak in tcrms of interests versus positions . Be open to outcomes, not attached to outcomcs r Focus on scrvice provision to all mcmbcr firc deparunents . Share and discuss ideas from a profcssional pcrspective
Terms of Reference The Committcc shall review these rerms every 24 months.
Febtuary 26,2027 NI9-1-1 Admin Agenda Page 59 of 59 17 Tourism Vancouver Island Announces Catalyst Funding Recipients
In 2020, the Province of BC announced $1-million in catalyst funding available to rural communities impacted by mill closures to develop new tourism opportunities. Each of the five regional destination management organizations, including Tourism Vancouver Island, will receive $200,000 to support destination development initiatives.
“The people behind B.C.’s tourism industry have overcome many challenges such as mill closures and wildfires, and are now facing the COVID-19 pandemic,” said Melanie Mark, Minister of Tourism, Arts, Culture and Sport. “We are working with the industry to help business survive the pandemic and create new opportunities throughout the province so we’re stronger than ever when it is safe to welcome visitors again.”
Tourism Vancouver Island is pleased to announce the recipients who will share the catalyst funding for the Vancouver Island region:
1. Regional District of Mount Waddington: Hut-to-Hut Planning Phase 2 The next phase of this hut-to-hut project will establish an Indigenous lesson program, complete an operational model study, design cabin structures and complete a critical site assessment.
2. Port McNeill: Wayfinding Project Following the Port McNeill tourism development strategy, this project will design, build and install visitor- facing wayfinding signage to key sites around Port McNeill.
3. Vancouver Island Trail Association: Indigenous Interpretive Signage The Vancouver Island Trail Association (formerly Spine Trail) will work in partnership with Kwakiutl First Nation to construct two interpretive signage installations along the Vancouver Island Trail.
4. British Columbia Marine Trail Association: North Island Marine Trail Indigenous Engagement Working with the North Island First Nations to develop economic partnership agreements focused on the North Island Marine Trail, identifying marine camping locations and opportunities for Indigenous partners to generate economic benefits.
5. Homalco First Nation: Bute Inlet Dock Project A significant enhancement of the dock at Homalco First Nation's bear viewing site, resulting in a safer and more welcoming arrival point for guests.
6. Port Alberni: Wayfinding Project Following the Port Alberni OCP and Reconciliation Strategy, this project will result in the design, construction and implementation of wayfinding signage in partnership with First Nations.
7. Mount Cain Alpine Park Society: Energy Efficiency Project Installation of a new, highly efficient generator that will enable Mount Cain to reliably service their operations.
8. Port Renfrew: Destination Trail Strategy A strategic planning process will outline Port Renfrew’s path to creating an exceptional network of visitor- ready trails focused on the area’s rugged coastline and old growth trees.
9. Ucluelet Mountain Bike Club: Mountain Bike Trail Project Construction of a new mountain bike trail that will connect two existing trail networks located on First Nations treaty settlement lands, helping to diversify Ucluelet's tourism offerings while also creating new opportunities for Indigenous partners.
We congratulate all successful applicants and commend the engagement of Indigenous partners in so many projects.
18
July 2020 Island Copper Closed Site Foreshore Demolition and Sediment Remediation Project
Project Overview
BHP Billiton Canada Inc. (BHP) is planning a project at the former Island Copper Mine (ICM) Foreshore area on Vancouver Island. The Foreshore area is approximately 3.6 hectares in two water lots leased to BHP from the Province of British Columbia (BC) and includes historical infrastructure including a barge ramp and ship loader. The project will include demolition of this infrastructure and remediation of marine sediments.
The objective of the project is to leave the Foreshore in a safe and stable condition for people and the environment. The project would start after regulatory approvals are received and is expected to take four months to complete. Pending regulatory approval, BHP intends to begin the project in winter 2022. This document is to provide stakeholders with an understanding of the works to be conducted.
1 19 Site History and 6). Removing these structures first allows access to the material to be dredged.
BHP operated ICM f rom 1971 to 1995 as a The removal of the barge ramp and ship loader will copper/molybdenum/gold/silver/rhenium open pit truck use typical marine demolition techniques. Equipment and shovel operation. It is located on the north shore may include: of Rupert Inlet in the northeastern part of Quatsino Sound on northern Vancouver Island, BC. The site 1. Crane barge – used to lif t and remove was made up of three distinct areas: the Foreshore, inf rastructure such as pilings onto material the Plant Site, and the Mine Site. The Foreshore scows (Figure 2); included a barge loading f acility used for unloading mine supplies, and a deep sea wharf used for the 2. Material scows – f lat bottomed barges used transfer of mine concentrates to marine vessels for f or stockpiling material until it is removed from transportation (Figure 1). The structures are located in site for disposal (Figure 3); and two water lots leased from what was then the BC Ministry of Agriculture and Lands. 3. Tug boats – used to move and maneuver the crane barge and material scows around the site.
Figure 1 Foreshore Site Plan In 1996, f ollowing shutdown of mining operations, BHP began implementation of an approved closure plan f or the mine. Minor reclamation activities were undertaken on the Foreshore.
In 2004, a site investigation of the Foreshore found elevated copper concentrations in marine sediments Figure 2 Typical Marine Crane Barge (reference immediately surrounding the ship loader. These FRPD.com) elevated copper concentrations are likely a result of spilled mine concentrate during the ship loading process during operations. The Foreshore is classified as a high-risk site under the BC Contaminated Sites Regulation. To address the contamination, BHP will be undertaking a project to remediate the Foreshore area. Project Description
The project will involve two key steps: (1) demolition to remove the infrastructure and (2) dredging to remediate the marine sediments. The majority of the work will be completed from the water, with minimal work on shore. Qualified third party contractors will conduct the required work.
What is Dredging? Dredging is the physical removal of sediments Figure 3 Typical Marine Material Scow (reference and debris f rom the bottom of a water body Vanpile.com)
using a boat or special device. Each structure will be removed in pieces with the demolition materials then placed on material scows. The material scows will be used to transport the The project will begin with the demolition of the barge material to land where it will be offloaded onto trucks ramp and ship loader (Deep See Warf ), (Figures 5 and hauled to a licensed landfill for disposal. 2 20 Af ter the infrastructure is removed, dredging of the Health, Safety and Environmental f ormer ship loader location can begin (Figure 7). The f oundation material for the ship loader consists of Management cobble rock between 1 to 8 inches in size. (Figure 4). Health, safety and environmental management is the top priority for BHP. All works will be completed in line with industry leading practice and BHP’s Health, Saf ety and Environment (HSE) Framework. The HSE Framework is an arrangement of documents and standards designed to manage health, safety and environmental risks.
Risk management is an integral component of the project. Project specific risk assessments will be completed outlining the required controls to manage project HSE risks to keep the workers, the community and the environment safe.
In addition, an Environmental Management Plan (EMP) and a post-dredging sampling plan will be developed. The EMP will describe practices to be Figure 4 Rock Cobble Foundation Material f ollowed to minimize environmental risk. The sampling The Project includes the use of a backhoe dredging plan will outline a post dredging program to confirm method. Dredging will be completed in the following that remediation was effective. steps: Regulatory Process 1. A backhoe will be used to excavate the cobble material from the sea floor. BHP is working with the f ollowing regulators to ensure that the required approvals are received prior to 2. The cobbles will be placed onto a barge with commencing work: a screen f loor and catch basin. The cobbles will be washed with seawater to remove the BC Ministry of Forests, Lands, Natural potentially contaminated fine materials. Resource Operations and Rural Development; 3. The wash water and f ine materials will be collected and disposed of in the Pit Lake BC Ministry of Environment and Climate where the potentially contaminated fines will Change Strategy; settle to the bottom of the Pit Lake. The clean cobble material will be stockpiled for BC Ministry of Energy, Mines and Petroleum benef icial reuse. Resources;
4. Sampling will be undertaken as dredging Fisheries and Oceans Canada; and progresses to ensure remediation efforts were successful. Transport Canada. 5. Once it is confirmed that the contamination Frequently Asked Questions has been removed, the clean cobble will be placed back into the marine environment to How will the project affect my community? create beneficial aquatic habitat (Figure 8). The project will result in increased marine and road traffic in the area for the duration of the project. The The proposed works are subject to change based on work will be completed primarily from the water, regulatory reviews and approvals. however will be contained to the foreshore area. Contractors and employees will stay in the local area f or the duration of the project, relying on local businesses for lodging, food and other necessities.
What is the Pit Lake? Are there opportunities for local businesses to In 1996 af ter closure of the ICM, the open pit work on this Project? was f looded with seawater to form the Pit Lake. A general contractor will be selected for the project The Pit Lake is a treatment system for site water who will employ the necessary trades and provide the to remove metals and neutralize acidity. required equipment f or the work. To the extent possible, local and Indigenous businesses will be engaged f or aspects of the work that will be tendered or bid in the competitive market.
3 21
Will any sensitive species or habitats be disturbed? The majority of the habitat within the project footprint is characterized by bedrock and boulders in the intertidal zone transitioning to cobble, woody debris and sand at depth. Eelgrass is abundant in the local area and is an important habitat for fish and wildlife. A small area of eelgrass may be disturbed as a result of the project. Through the remediation of the contaminated sediments and the reuse of cobble to create beneficial aquatic habitat, the intent of the project is to leave the remediated areas in a better and more productive ecological condition.
The BC Conservation database identifies five potential species at risk with the potential to occur within the vicinity of the project. These include northern abalone, humpback whale, orca (resident and transient populations) and the Steller sea lion. BHP has conducted field surveys to assess whether these species are utilizing the project. During those surveys none of the species have been observed and the overall potential for species at risk to use the habitat within the project f ootprint was determined as low. The EMP will outline mitigation measures to protect and prevent harm to aquatic species. Community Enquiries
If you have any questions or enquiries please feel free to contact us at 306-286-4411 or by email at [email protected]
4 22
Figure 5
Figure 6
5 23
Figure 7
Figure 8
6 24 Ô mlÍry ol Fotrtr, L.nd., ìl¡ür¡l R¡¡or¡rrr Oprnüom rnd Rurrl oüraloern nt m, Wú.r l¡mgmtont Bnnch Annu¡l wrbr gyrtrm Rrtr¡rn J.nu¡ry Ot,æ21
ma.nt Vtl(tgon R.elond 0¡!lol Rrùrn Rrgoft by: t¡Lññ 20,2021 PO 80X 7æ Cllrtt ]lo: ¡te7 PORTtcilCrtt0c voN2R0 trtrrSn tlo: 00æ Itrbrtylrn llmr: Ot¡lb. Ld(. Sy.bñr
Ouw: ilounl Uldrlngtm R.ctond Olrtrtcl
Th. mom.tlm h lñl¡ nforf wlll b. aon ldñd ln ürr crhubtþn ol yorr mxt rnnurl ¡rntrl. F¡lur tov;lÎy thl¡ lnlonn¡üofl, rd dur dlú, mry n ui ln b¡lne ch¡¡¡prl tt tfl. m¡¡lmum lovol WLb? ForCelcnd¡rYo¡r 2020 Wort Vbf¡.tt (6åþm.trl.) tocaþn (e¡bþ,n lnr) Locún At tho 8ourc. 8r¡læ. lrl¡lf Cor¡txtwri¡e 0 Atth. llorc. Alül. Al thr Cudon¡r f,þt
(c¡¡öþrn lr!) l¡cúloo (eûaomtü) tocdoo {¡ulæ.Unrì 0 Atño 8ouæ. Ooutô¡¡ir: 0 Alth.8ou.c. Atô. Altñr Culocr Nof itdnd Nolf¡h|¡cd *'?lã ¡hO.ftOñdl **låF ùltOrd: û¡¡0mlt¡ Ëfr rz. zozo aôþnL- Oû.l.mrfrOltOrt b: (lorrllH.hD.lt o.r:ttt ù¡: qlrorìür¡. q¡*ífr¡ tourc (.1 oltfl.?t¡.d Plr. pfiry*ll tho ltolorlng lntormlüoll ròout your PLr. hìdlcL tho rorrc¡ nrrr{r) rnd ôr prrcrnbgr ol Criol¡rro: lrfplt ürd horn aæh. ilunbr ol R¡r5¡nthl 186 lake t Quatse 100 x t¡triba. o, Olhr Comccüon¡:
2 Tobl Pçrldon: 430 I Brl¡ ol Eünrtr: 2016 Census b ¡dd[ond Cr¡llvllütAn: lrcbn .¡ûlne fcmo¡ hold ln yor¡t nfno b t¡a not r¡aad md (b ñol p.ñ of yor¡Î danlogrnril tandoilrût I corüfy üf ür¡ úovr hfon¡rrüolr L coflrcù
Sþntunof Olflc5: PoltlolVllr: ¡t Ot 12 .^ M À-AI a ^itr Pûrtfrfrmr: fArßr¿¡* Þ¿*l¡1ê¡llY phqrot{o. (? Prgo I ol2 El¡rydFo,.å. lft tatí^.tût¡aa: l¡olo.r: frr: @)t'.0ô6 Lrû. lù¡rrl far.¡rtlr Fjo3rN PRO\rOOvl F.0 8til PRo^/OOVr Raû¡o er¡rdr lrrlò: Oprdo¡ø lrclo.b¡C \rü,lrnat wlct.æ \ürrel.r ¡t¡twrr¡g9.b.ffit o RrdOrraþ0.ial 25 From: Greg Fox Good Day Gentlemen, Ivan Hall and I have a company called Integrum Recovery & Salvage We currently lease the bulk head barge ramp located at the WFP a frame site. We are looking for letters of support to add a commercial boat ramp, similar to the town of port McNeill’s but larger and more gradual to assist in removing large fishing vessels and derelict and abandoned vessels for deconstruction or repairs. This would greatly increase PM as a marine hub. This would be an asset for mechanical, painting, supply and many other business as well shipping and receiving. All we are asking is for letters saying yes this is a great idea and we look forward to more info. We are currently working with the three bands that have claims to the area. Two of which are very supportive and one who is in a political struggle with WFP. We do have a plan on these matters. Please see attached document for more detail on this matter. Thank you, Greg Fox, Owner Fox’s Disposal Services Ltd. Phone 250-949-6306 Fax 250-949-6320 Disclaimer: This email, and any attachments, is intended only for the addressee(s) named herein and may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this email or any attachments is strictly prohibited. 26 Habitat Assessment / Sub-tidal Review WFP / Port McNeill Breakwater Large Vessel Ramp Construction Prepared for: Integrum Recovery and Salvage Prepared by: Steven Lacasse, BSc. RPBio BCL BIOTECHNOLOGIES LTD. 445 Pioneer Hill Drive Port McNeill, B.C. V0N 2R0 Telephone 250-956-2243 Cell 250-949-1000 [email protected] Project #: 21001 February 12, 2021 27 WFP / Port McNeill Breakwater Large Vessel Ramp Construction Executive Summary McNeill Bay, on northeast Vancouver Island is within the traditional territories of the Kwakuitl First Nation (KFN). The area is recognized as an industry hub for many local contractors (forestry, fishing, mining and tourism). There are limited areas for marine access that have been developed in Port McNeill. A proposal to modify an existing breakwater and marine jetty into a large vessel de-watering / haul-out facility has been developed. BCL Biotechnologies Ltd. (BCL) is a biological and marine consulting company focusing on environmental stewardship within and near aquatic ecosystems. Steven Lacasse, Senior Biologist (BSc. RPBio,) oversees all environmental proposals, marine inspections, and surveys. Final reports, communications and recommendations are reviewed or written by qualified environmental professionals (QEP) prior to submission. The focus of this survey is to provide: • An accurate review of conditions and habitats within the proposed development area • Professional interpretation & guidance related to current legislation • Identify any potential harmful alteration disturbance or destruction (HADD) of fish or fish habitats • Provide professional and experienced team members for environmental monitoring or support. A WorksafeBC certified dive team conducted an underwater habitat assessment of two previously identified potential development areas for the proposed large vessel ramp / dewatering facility. ! Site 1 (seaward end of the breakwater) displayed a shallow, steeply sloping boulder / fill area near the breakwater. This transitioned into a gently sloping fine sediment / mud bottom below datum. A small eelgrass patch (critical fish habitat) was observed just past the 100-m distance marker from the beach. ! Site 2 (near shore) displayed a gently sloping sand / mud intertidal zone throughout, with deposits of fine and coarse wood debris near datum. Sand / mud display minimal activity of burrowing worms, historic sea star excavations and / or potential clam habitat. Large deposits of wood and decomposing organics (typical of log dump areas) indicate this area to be highly impacted and low value fish habitat. No attached kelps, algae or grasses were observed within the surveyed area. Only one flatfish was observed over the 100-m of observed benthos. Larger rip-rap and boulders had sparse settlement of barnacles. For either of the two sites, large boulder fill added near the existing breakwater, or levelling existing fill above datum will not adversely affect fish or fish habitats. Existing material should be utilized as fill or construction media. Recommendation - Any new fill material should be clean boulders and larger crush (shot rock) to reduce future turbidity and tidal area sedimentation while increasing settlement areas for invertebrates and algae. Recommendation – Existing large angular boulders (with barnacles) should be moved into deeper water or towards the outer fill area in order to maintain plant / animal diversity. Habitat Assessment / Sub-tidal Review i 28 WFP / Port McNeill Breakwater Large Vessel Ramp Construction WFP / Port McNeill Breakwater Large Vessel Ramp Construction Habitat Assessment / Sub-tidal Review McNeill Bay, Vancouver Island January 11, 2021 Table of Contents Executive Summary...... i Table of Contents...... ii I – INTRODUCTION...... 1 Limitations…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 3 II – METHODS...... 4 Overall Beach Review ……………………………………………………………………………………..………………. 4 Sub-tidal Survey – Transects to Depth ……………………………………………………………………………………….. 4 Sub-tidal Survey - Shallow Swim Along the Beach...... ` 7 III – OBSERVATIONS...... 8 Sub-tidal Survey - Transects to Depth……………………………………….……………………………………………….. 9 Sub-Tidal Survey - Shallow Swim Along the Beach……………………………………………………………………… 10 IV – DISCUSSION...... 11 V – CONCLUSION & RECOMMENDATIONS...... 11 VI-REFERENCES...... 13 APPENDIX #1 – WFP / Port McNeill Breakwater Sub-tidal Dive Survey - Video Log...... 14 APPENDIX #2 – Observed Species List ...... 18 APPENDIX #3 – Transect Cross Section Bathymetric Profile ………………………………………………...………… 19 APPENDIX #4 - Original Project Proposal ……………………………………..……………………………………..………….. 21 List of Tables Table #1 - Differential GPS Coordinates for WFP / Port McNeill Breakwater Transect Placement .…. 5 Table #2 –Transect locations and corresponding depth and corrected distances …………………………………. 7 Habitat Assessment / Sub-tidal Review ii 29 WFP / Port McNeill Breakwater Large Vessel Ramp Construction List of Figures Figure 1 - Breakwater Overview – Proposed locations for large vessel ramp facility. …………………….………. 3 Figure 2 – Transect Locations – WFP / Port McNeill Breakwater (January 11, 2021)………………………………. 6 Figure 3 - Shallow swim along the beach review …………………………………………………………………………………….. 7 Figure 4 - DVD times recorded during survey………………………………………………………………………………………….. 8 Figure 5 – Transect #1 – Inner Breakwater………………………………………………………………………..………………………. 9 Figure 6 – Transect #2 – Proposed Site #2 – Barge Beaching area. ………………………………………………………….. 10 Figure 7 - Transect #3 – Proposed Site #1 – Barge Beaching area………………………………………………………….. 10 Habitat Assessment / Sub-tidal Review iii 30 WFP / Port McNeill Breakwater Large Vessel Ramp Construction I - Introduction Historically, larger derelict, abandoned or damaged vessels have been dealt with by: deep water sinking; terrestrial / beach abandonment, dismantling or destruction at site; or simply abandoning in place. Recent marine environmental protection measures require that these vessels be removed from the marine environment. Disposal must be conducted following approved work procedures and environmentally approved protocols. Constructing marine facilities that will accommodate large salvage machinery requires deep water ramps, heavy lift facilities or road access to shallow beaches. Existing facilities with these specific features are limited, or non-existent, on the central coast and northern Vancouver Island. Sensitive or productive marine habitats can be protected by Indentifying low risk locations that could allow construction and development for removing these larger vessels. Re-using or modifying existing infrastructure reduces or eliminates additional environmental impacts and reduces design and construction costs. A positive environmental (and economical) solution to constructing a vessel facility in Port McNeill would be to re-purpose and utilize a previously impacted industrial site along the southern shoreline of McNeill Bay. This would eliminate additional impacts to pristine environments, reduce development / construction costs, and assist with environmental reclamation for a previously disturbed / impacted site. Log handling facilities are an integral part of forest harvesting operations in Coastal British Columbia. Approved Work Practices (AWPs) from both Fisheries and Oceans (DFO) and the Coastal Forest Sector have been developed to assist proponents with siting, design, operation, deactivation and reactivation phases for log handling facilities. The AWP’s are designed to mitigate or avoid negative impacts on marine environments (DFO, 2011). Although these AWPs are no longer listed on the DFO website, they continue to be the best available guidance documents to follow for site assessments and review. Recent legislation dictates that all development within the aquatic environment will ensure “no serious harm, alteration, disturbance or destruction to fish or their habitats can occur without full review and authorization” (DFO, 2019). There are two main impacts that result from the development of log handling facilities: 1. Physical disturbance of natural marine habitats • These result from construction and operation of the facilities. • Mechanical scouring by logs and bundle movement through the water column. 2.. Ecosystem changes • Accumulations of wood debris such as bark, sticks, and abraded wood fibre on the ocean bottom. Deposition will alter benthic substrate conditions and animal populations. (McDaniel, 1975). Thick layers of wood debris may smother benthos fauna, reduce fecundity and increase eggs mortality. Toxic compounds can also be released in the ecosystem from bark leachates and organic degradation (DFO, 2003). • Increased turbidity (suspended materials) and shadowing (log bundles / floating structures) will decrease primary productivity dependant on sunlight and light penetrating through the water. Habitat Assessment / Sub-tidal Review 1 31 WFP / Port McNeill Breakwater Large Vessel Ramp Construction These issues can be minimized with site-specific best management practices (BMPs). The overall impact of developing marine facilities on coastal environments can be minimized most by utilizing pre-existing facilities, targeting sites with a lower degree of biological significance or selecting sites that have been previously approved, developed or impacted. A constructed marine breakwater / jetty and log dump facility was developed on northern Vancouver Island, just west of the Port McNeill Harbour. The proposal is located at the southeast end of McNeill Bay and the northwest end of Johnston Strait near Broughton Passage. Figure #1 outlines the two main areas reviewed, each of which could be potentially developed for this proposal. This location demonstrates a with preivous habitat impact (wood debris deposition). The breakwater has been identified as a potential location for constructing a large vessel ramp / dewatering area in Port McNeill. Western Forest Products Ltd. (WFP) is the current lease holder of this breakwater and log dump facility within McNeill Bay. It has not been utilized as a dump facility since 2012. An barge loading facility / ramp is currently located along the eastern side of the constructed breakwater. This facility is only accessible during high tide events and calm weather. On the opposite (west) side of the breakwater, there is an abandoned A-frame log watering system with accompanying small docks, degraded barge ramp, and a log sorting area. These abandoned structures are used occasionally for tug and barge mooring only. Thorough beach and underwater review has identified three potential sites that could be utilized as potential development for an industrial ramp / haul-out location. This document outlines a habitat review and outlines potential biological concerns and benefits for two of the best locations. These two locations offer the least environmental impact or stakeholder interference. Appendix 4 provides the original proposal and rationelle for development at this location. Construction along marine foreshores require developers to assess potential impact to the environment by a Qualified Environmental Professional (QEP) and then provide periodic reviews and monitoring. Inter-tidal and shallow sub-tidal areas contain productive habitats for a variety of marine species (alga, plant, invertebrate, and fish). Inter-tidal reviews conducted during a low tidal event will provide access and review of critical beach, wildlife and riparian zones. Sub-tidal surveys at high tide events will provide review of fish and invertebrate activity of the shoreline that may not have been evident when exposed to air during the low tidal review. A sub-tidal review along west side of the WFP / Port McNeill breakwater (proposed development area) will provide biological data, with a visual document, of existing marine conditions. This information will assist in determining existing environmental health and potential impacts that could occur by developing a large vessel ramp / dewatering facility at this location. Approved methods and survey techniques will allow constructive dialogue and planning related to potential impacts within the development area and the surrounding shallow sub-tidal habitat. The main purpose of this survey is to inform KFN, Integrum Recovery and Salvage, Government Agencies, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, and any concerned groups about existing environmental conditions and habitat dynamics at the proposed development location. The focus of this report is to provide: a. A visual document for existing habitat conditions (at the time of survey) of shallow near shore area along the western side of the existing breakwater. Beach overview review, transect surveys (in the direction of proposed ramp development) and a shallow, near shore swim will ensure adequate area review. b. A bathymetric profile chart of the proposed development area. Any areas of concern for constructing a large vessel dewatering area can be addressed. c. Relevant biological recommendations for specific habitats near the proposed development area Habitat Assessment / Sub-tidal Review 2 32 WFP / Port McNeill Breakwater Large Vessel Ramp Construction (clams, grasses, kelp beds etc.). Proposed Site 1 McNeill Bay WFP A-Frame Dump Proposed Port McNeill Site 2 Harbour Schoolhouse Creek Figure 1 - Breakwater Overview – Proposed locations for large vessel ramp facility. This survey was conducted during a high tide event in order to conduct a detailed review of shoreline habitats from upper inter-tidal through to deeper sub-tidal zones while underwater. These will outline general area habitat zones that have some amount of seawater exposure. Adequate placement of review transect lines throughout the proposed development area will document and highlight all habitat types and areas that may require additional review, discussion or monitoring. Limitation This report has been prepared for the use and distribution by Integrum Recovery and Salvage. Results are based upon an inspection of the inter-tidal and sub-tidal areas mentioned in this report and on the conditions observed November 10th and 15th, 2020 and January 11th, 2021. Results and Observations in this report have been made in a manner consistent with the level of care and skill normally applied by environmental professionals practicing under similar conditions to those encountered at the time of the assessment. Significant environmental changes can occur in marine Habitat Assessment / Sub-tidal Review 3 33 WFP / Port McNeill Breakwater Large Vessel Ramp Construction environments that have the potential to invalidate the results in this report. If such a change occurs (the probability of change increases over time) reassessment of the site may be necessary. II – Methods The methodologies of the assessment of the foreshore, inter-tidal and sub-tidal zones followed the Marine Assessment Protocol for Assessing Fish Habitat and Wood Debris Deposition for Re-Activated Log Dumps (DFO 2011). Although, these methods are no longer listed on the DFO website, they are the most current guidelines to utilize in determining the potential for causing serious harm to fish if a facility licence is modified. These methods will be utilized until further guidance or updated AWP’s, relating to log handling facilities, are provided by DFO. There were three separate components for this portion of the pre-development assessment. Each provides essential base line information for siting criteria, planning, and future monitoring of potential impacts. Overall Beach Review During a low tide event on the mornings of November 10th and 15th, 2020, the overall site was reviewed by the proponent and local field biologist (QEP). The team reviewed specific areas proposed for future development. Overall beach conditions and inter-tidal habitats were observed and photographed for reference. Locations were documented on supplied aerial photographs of the breakwater. Advantages and potential concerns were discussed on location. Sub-tidal Survey – Transects to Depth A team consisting of three certified WorksafeBC divers were on site at all times. All team members are also certified boat tenders / dive accident management personnel. The team had two in water SCUBA divers and one topside tender / diver assistant on-site at all times. The survey commenced at Transect #1 – and concluded at Transect #3. An underwater digital video system (with lights) and accurately measured transect lines were observed at three locations (100-meter transect lines). A permanent record of biological habitat types at a specific time has been produced. This initial assessment was conducted on January 11, 2021 following approved marine benthic procedures and protocols for reviewing habitat and wood deposits for log dumps (DFO, 2003). These procedures allowed for an accurate assessment of habitat types and a detailed fish, invertebrate and substrate review. In order to accurately assess aquatic habitats, document biological activity, and allow future comparisons, the shallow sub-tidal area (<100 feet of depth) requires a permanent visual reference. For the WFP breakwater shoreline review, the southwest corner was utilized as the survey point of commencement (POC). Surveys were conducted along transect lines placed in a south to north pattern. A total of 3 transects were identified within the area. Transect #1 provides beach overview away from the proposed development. Transect #2 highlights the main area of impact and surrounding habitats near proposed Site #2. Transect #3 is the most northerly (seaward) proposed development area with deeper water near the beach and least amount of interference with established infrastructure. 100-meter long transect lines were attached to shrubs / roots, boulders, or deposited logs on the beach. Each transect is made from sinking long line and clearly labelled every 5 meters with permanent colour coded tape. All transect lines were attached to the beach so the 0-meter mark coincided as close to the highest watermark as possible. Once secured, each line was pulled tight with the boat. When the 100-meter mark was reached, the boat was manoeuvred to orient the line at a slight angle to the breakwater approximately the angle the ramp would be constructed for access to roads. A 12# lead anchor weight was attached to the terminal end of the transect line. Accurate dGPS coordinates were documented, and the anchor was released off the front of the vessel. This procedure Habitat Assessment / Sub-tidal Review 4 34 WFP / Port McNeill Breakwater Large Vessel Ramp Construction allows transect lines to be kept tight and in the desired direction before deployment. All transect locations were identified and documented on vessel charts and logs for future surveys and referencing. A Simrad NSS9-EVO2 differential Global Positioning System (dGPS) / Multi-function Plotter was utilized to accurately document all transect attachment and terminal anchor positions. Photographic images were taken at the time of installation to allow documentation transect attachment points. The shallow, gently sloping nature of the sub-tidal beach in this area only allowed the dGPS antenna to be placed within 3 meters of the beach attachment points during a high tidal event. At low tide, most of the transect line was out of the water. A list of coordinates for all transect line locations is referenced in Table #1. Figure #2 outlines transect locations and corresponding coordinates on a chart of the proposed lease. WFP / Port McNeill Breakwater – Transect Survey Beach Location Anchor Location Description Latitude (o North) Longitude (o West) Latitude (o North) Longitude (o West) Transect #1- Southwest Breakwater 50 35.352 127 05.604 50 35.406 127 05.638 Transect #2 – Proposed Site #2 50 35.422 126 05.607 50 35.470 126 05.655 Transect #3 – Proposed Site #3 50 35.546 127 05.587 50 35.579 126 05.628 Table #1 – Differential GPS Coordinates for Transect Placement – WFP / Port McNeill Breakwater Transect surveys for Port McNeill Large Vessel Ramp were conducted in a northerly direction. The divers descended along each transect line and made observations to a maximum distance of 100- meters. Continuous video was captured along each transect line from the surface. Each 5-meter label was recorded with the surrounding flora and fauna. Digital recordings of a diver’s computer were documented at every 10-meter distance mark. These highlight depth at specific distances from the beach attachment point All collected video footage was copied in its entirety onto digital videodiscs (DVD) for review and archival purposes. Detailed maps and locations were developed and edited into the DVD document for clarity. General observations were made while reviewing the video production. Specific features relating to transect location (depth of water, substrate type and slope, abundance and types of flora and fauna) are important indicators for assessing quality of habitat. All noted features are included in the observations section of this report. A detailed account of time, depth and general observations are included in Appendix #1- WFP / Port McNeill Large Vessel Ramp - Sub-tidal Survey - Video Log. Observed species and relative abundances are outlined in Appendix #2 - Observed Species List. All shallow sub-tidal area surveys followed the “Approved Work Practices (AWP) for Re-activated Log Dumps in Marine Waters of British Columbia - Appendix B – Marine Assessment Protocol for Assessing Fish Habitat and Wood Debris Deposition for Re-Activated Log Dumps” (DFO, 2011). Habitat Assessment / Sub-tidal Review 5 35 WFP / Port McNeill Breakwater Large Vessel Ramp Construction Figure 2 - Transect Locations – WFP / Port McNeill Breakwater (January 11, 2021) Depth and distance information has been corrected for slope and time specific tidal activity. Table #2 outlines the starting time for the dive surveys, the tide height and the corrected depth to the Chart Datum for each 10-meter interval along each transect line. All distances along each transect were corrected (using Pythagorean theorem) to adjust for the slope of the ocean floor to produce accurate bathymetric profile. Stations outlined in this report are slope distances. Appendix #3 – Transect Cross Section Bathymetric Profile highlights slope, depth and corrected distance graphs for all transect lines observed for the WFP / Port McNeill Breakwater surveys. Habitat Assessment / Sub-tidal Review 6 36 WFP / Port McNeill Breakwater Large Vessel Ramp Construction WFP / Port McNeill Breakwater Distance from beach (m) Start Time Tidal Height above 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Chart Datum Observed depth (m) 0 -1.5 -2.1 -2.4 -2.4 -2.7 -2.7 -3.0 -3.0 -3.0 -3.4 16.0’ Depth relative to Transect #1 11/01/21 12:21 4.9 3.4 2.7 2.4 2.4 2.1 2.1 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.5 4.9 m datum Corrected distance 0 9.9 19.9 29.9 39.9 49.9 59.9 69.9 79.9 89.9 99.8 Observed depth (m) 0.2 -1.8 -3.0 -3.4 -3.7 -3.7 -4.9 -6.4 -7.0 -6.7 -6.7 15.6’ Transect #2 11/01/21 12:33 Depth relative to 4.9 2.9 1.7 1.4 1.1 1.1 -0.1 -1.6 -2.3 -2.0 -2.0 4.8 m datum Corrected distance 0 9.8 19.8 29.8 39.7 49.7 59.7 69.6 79.5 89.5 99.5 Observed depth (m) 0.5 -2.7 -5.2 -6.7 -7.3 -7.3 -7.3 -7.3 -7.6 -7.6 -8.2 14.6’ Transect #3 11/01/21 12:59 Depth relative to 4.5 m 4.9 1.7 -0.7 -2.3 -2.9 -2.9 -2.9 -2.9 -3.2 -3.2 -3.8 datum Corrected distance 0 9.5 19.2 29.1 39.0 49.0 59.0 69.0 79.0 89.0 99.0 Table #2 – Transect lines and corresponding depth and corrected distances. Sub-tidal Survey - Shallow Swim Along the Beach The second component of the sub-tidal dive survey was a shallow swim along the beach. Once the 100-meter distance marker was observed, the video camera was turned off and the divers returned to shallower depths along the nearby breakwater. Upon reaching shallower, near-shore habitats (10 foot to surface depth range), the divers swam parallel to the beach in a northerly direction until the next transect line was observed. The shallow swim allowed observations over a portion of shallow, near- shore habitat between each transect line. Depths were recorded at intervals as the divers swam parallel to the beach, This procedure produced a “zigzag” survey pattern of shallow, near-shore, inter- tidal environments along the breakwater. Figure 3 highlights direction of observed swim between Transect #2 and #3. Shallow near-shore habitats provide highest productivity areas and may display changes or impacts from surrounding developments. Adequately documenting shallow areas along the western beach will confirm the shallow observations made along the transect survey. Shallow swims can also identify smaller areas of critical habitat that may have been missed during the transect review. Relative abundances of specific plants and animals were estimated by the biologist / diver. No physical measuring or calculation was performed at this time. Figure 3 – Shallow swim along the beach review Habitat Assessment / Sub-tidal Review 7 37 WFP / Port McNeill Breakwater Large Vessel Ramp Construction Complete video documents were produced for the application area. Figure 4 documents all video times observed on the DVD production along with estimated locations for the transects. Figure 4 - DVD times recorded during survey. Reference can be made to the maps while observing the DVD, or noting written comment outlined in Appendix #1. All species that could be positively identified utilized various reference materials (Barnes, 1987; Druehl, 2000; Harbo, 1999; Lamb & Hanby, 2005) are listed in Appendix #2 – Observed Species List. III – Observations This assessment focused Site #1 and Site #2 as the best suited for disturbance and development. During the initial beach overview survey, Site #3 (east side of the breakwater), was considered too close to the estuary of Schoolhouse Creek, had interference concerns with other stakeholders (marina and existing barge facility), and would require excessive material / fill for development. Site #3 was the least preferred location for development. Sub-tidal surveys were conducted to fully review substrates and habitats for the proposed area of development. The preliminary assessment identified no potential environmental concerns within the area. The geography of inter-tidal and shallow sub-tidal zones, near the constructed breakwater, display gently sloping sand / mud substrates throughout. Large areas of sub-tidal benthos had deposits of woody debris. Angular boulder and rip-rap fill was observed along all shorelines of the breakwater, including the proposed development sites. A small patch of sparse eelgrass, critical habitats for fish development, was observed just past the Δ0+100m distance mark along Transect #3. Habitat Assessment / Sub-tidal Review 8 38 WFP / Port McNeill Breakwater Large Vessel Ramp Construction The extensive shallow impacted nature of the western side of WFP / Port McNeill Breakwater creates a large, low productivity area for kelp and algae. Due to the fine sediment and small substrates observed throughout, much of the sparse algae become mobile in currents or wave activity during the growth season. Sub-tidal Survey - Transects to Depth Dive observations were made at 3 separate and documented points near, and within, the proposed development area. Substrate types observed in this area are typical of protected sounds and inlets (Kozloff, 1973). Areas at the base of mainly angular boulder / rip-rap filled breakwater beaches contained mostly sand / mud and woody debris. Solid environments provide stable substrate for sessile (stationary) and filter feeding organisms. Fine sediments and sand deposits display limited evidence of sea stars excavations, a few anemones (solid wood or occasional boulders). These shallow areas also exhibited little algae / kelp attachment. Only one flat-fish and limited invertebrates (barnacles and anemones) were observed near the beach. At the base of angular boulder / rip-rap breakwater fill area, the bottom becomes relatively flat sloped sand / fine sediments with only occasional boulders. Thick fine sediments and deposited wood debris had limited invertebrates consisting of only a few frilled anemones and a few sponge colonies. The only critical habitat for fish or invertebrates was a small patch of sparse eelgrass located at the north end of Transect #3 for the proposed development Site #1. Mild tidal currents were observed at this location. Drifting algae was observed within the water column. Thick, fine organic substrate settlement is deposited over most areas near the breakwater. Minimal wave / swell activity was observed at any location within this area, even during wind / storm events. The breakwater protects the inner WFP / McNeill Bay area. Figure 5 - Transect #1 – Inner Breakwater Transect #1 displayed steep sloping small angular boulder / shot rock fill along the upper beach. Similar substrate becomes gently sloping before transitioning to clean sand and pea gravel at Δ0+010m distance. At Δ0+065m distance, the gently sloping benthos becomes thick fine sediments covering pea gravel. Occasional depressions are evident in the fine sediments to expose the underlying gravel (sea star excavations?). Sparse drift sea lettuce is observed throughout. Occasional woody debris and a few decaying logs are scattered at various locations past Δ0+070m distance. This entire transect was within the inter-tidal zone. Maximum observed depth was -10 feet (corrected to +6 above datum for tide). Habitat Assessment / Sub-tidal Review 9 39 WFP / Port McNeill Breakwater Large Vessel Ramp Construction Figure 6 - Transect #2 – Proposed Site #2 – Barge Beaching area. First 5m of the transect was steep angular boulders / shot rock fill covered with green surface algae. At Δ0+005m, shot rock and fill becomes clean with some gravel and dense attachment of barnacles on the larger boulders. Thick coarse wood debris with a dusting of fine sediments is encountered from Δ0+015m to Δ0+035m distances. At Δ0+035, patches of thin white bacteria are evident between larger wood pieces have frilled anemones. A flatfish is observed on the fine sediments with sparse drift sea lettuce. At Δ0+055m distance, thick fine sediments have a thin covering of dark brown diatoms with a dusting of coarse organic sediments. Thick coarse wood debris with occasional decaying logs and a complete dusting of fine sediments is observed from Δ0+070m distance to the end of transect at Δ0+100m. Datum (corrected depth of 0 feet) is observed at Δ0+060m distance with the maximum corrected depth being -7 feet at 0+080m. The bottom becomes slightly shallower (-6 feet) for the final 20m of transect. Figure 7 - Transect #3 – Proposed Site #1 – Barge Beaching area. This transect represents the steepest and deepest observed boulder / shot rock fill for this survey. Bank transitioned to thick, fine, gently sloping sediments at Δ0+020m distance and a corrected depth of -2 feet. Various thickness of wood debris was observed from Δ0+015m to Δ0+040m distances. Wood had frilled anemone attachments. At Δ0+040m, bottom is thick fine sediments throughout. Occasional yellow sponge, sparse drift sea lettuce and brown branching algae (stalks only) are observed with intermittent small patches of white anaerobic bacteria. A flatfish is observed at 0+045m distance. At 0+085m a small patch of sparse eelgrass is observed to the west of the transect line. Sub-Tidal Survey - Shallow Swim Along Beach All transect lines were deployed at a slight angle to the breakwater. Transect anchors were in close proximity to the base of the breakwater bank. The divers swam from the transect anchors directly east, back to the breakwater. The only section of shallow near-shore (inter-tidal breakwater) that was recorded with video was between Transect #2 and #3. There were no critical inter-tidal habitats observed that would be impacted by the proposed development. Habitat Assessment / Sub-tidal Review 10 40 WFP / Port McNeill Breakwater Large Vessel Ramp Construction IV – Discussion The data collected for this environmental assessment highlights specific habitats; provides bathymetry profiles; and identifies any areas of concern. This survey followed the pre-existing Fisheries and Oceans accepted and published protocols designed to provide habitat review, specific for log dumps and active wood processing facilities (Approved Work Practices) within a documented area (DFO, 2003; DFO - AWP, 2011). The area of proposed development at the WFP / Port McNeill breakwater displays: a) limited boulder and crevice habitat in the shallow sub-tidal zone; b) gently sloping fine soft sediment / pea gravel (inter-tidal – Site #2) c) gently sloping fine sediment and mud (sub-tidal Site #1) d) no habitats of concern (eelgrass / abalone) within the area of proposed development; and e) thick, non-recovered woody debris impact over most sub-tidal areas. These five habitat observations indicate there are no benthic zones of concern, and no observed fish habitat or recruitment areas; In addition, this area exhibits continued impacts and non-recovered benthic sub-tidal areas. McNeill Bay exhibits a protected waterway with limited exposure to water flow and wave activity. This creates large areas for debris (wood, bark or drifting biomass) to settle thick enough to smother the underlying organisms. Observations in this area outline a wide, sand / mud with some pea gravel, marginally productive inter-tidal zone. Sparse rockweed (Fucus gardnerii), drift sea lettuce (Ulva sp.), and limited acorn barnacles (Balanus glandula) attachment occurs on some solid substrates. Only the near shore boulder and shot rock fill substrates provide stable environments for limited sessile (stationary), filter feeding organisms. There is minimal evidence of sea stars predation (excavation scars) in the inter-tidal areas. No sea stars were observed on this survey. Once the permanent sub- tidal zone is reached, the benthos becomes a thick fine sediment / mud and woody debris. Eelgrass is a flowering marine plant that is critical habitat for protecting many juvenile fish species. Eelgrass also provides stable attachment media for epiphytes for foraging fish and invertebrates. Identified as important for many marine species, the updated DFO Guidance and Provisions of Bill C-68 for the protections of all fish habitat with regards to projects in or near water (DFO, Aug. 2019) requires any identified harmful alteration, damage, or destruction (HADD) be addressed. A mitigation or compensation plan must be developed in order to facilitate a “no-net loss” program. The only critical habitat observed near the development application is a small sparse eelgrass patch at the Δ0+100m distance along Transect #3. The patch is outside any fill or disturbance zones for the proposed barge ramp / dewatering construction area. It will not be directly, or indirectly, impacted by inter-tidal activity along the breakwater. Currents and observed suspended debris movement indicate good water flow through this eelgrass patch. V – Conclusion & Recommendations The natural geography of this site is relatively flat fine sediment and gravel substrates within the inter and sub-tidal areas. All upper beach areas highlight angular boulder and shot rock fill material with only sparse attachment of barnacles within the proposed development area. Relatively flat sub-tidal soft sediment offers limited stable zones for algae or invertebrate attachment within the proposed development area. Habitat Assessment / Sub-tidal Review 11 41 WFP / Port McNeill Breakwater Large Vessel Ramp Construction Detailed observation, taken by divers during the underwater survey highlight an extensive soft sediment benthic area beside the constructed breakwater. Thick fine sediments, deposited woody debris and a dusting of coarse organic sediments indicate low flushing and debris settlement within the bay. There were no identified areas with inter-tidal bivalves or commercial fish species (Dungeness crabs) observed during the survey at this location. There are no zones of kelp / fish rearing habitat along the breakwater. There are no habitat concerns relating to inter-tidal or shallow sub-tidal excavation or filling. This area displays an impacted environment with limited colonization of organisms. The shallow benthos displays low productivity and does not display significant habitats of concern relating to development at the existing breakwater. Thorough review and professional biological recommendation indicate there are two potential development locations at the existing WFP / Port McNeill breakwater. Proposed Location #1 – Northwest Breakwater as having the least environmental disturbance and development requirements. If this site would not be developed, then Proposed Location #2 – Southwest Breakwater displays some of the lowest value habitat and would be the next best development location. Modifications can made to accommodate hauling / beaching of larger vessels. Existing fill material can be utilized to modify the breakwater in place. Large boulders and shot rock fill have been exposed to sea water. Exposed material that has visible settlement can be carefully moved for tidal exposure to maintain existing productivity. Recommendation - Large angular boulders (with barnacles) should be moved into deeper water or placed along outer fill zones in order to maintain existing plant / animal diversity. If additional fill is required, clean boulders and larger shot rock fill (crushed material) should be added as ballast, fill, or topping substrates. Substrate of this type can be added near the breakwater, or utilized as topping / levelling material. Clean larger material placed above datum will not adversely affect fish or fish habitats. This type of substrate will increase settlement areas for invertebrates and algae. Recommendation - New construction material should be clean boulders and larger crush (shot rock) to reduce future turbidity and sedimentation. Any development along the breakwater should be focused along the west side to avoid the estuary of Schoolhouse Creek. (Proposed Location #3). Due to existing habitat and stakeholder concerns, this site was not reviewed at this time. Habitat Assessment / Sub-tidal Review 12 42 WFP / Port McNeill Breakwater Large Vessel Ramp Construction VI - References i. Barnes, Robert D. 1987. Invertebrate Zoology 5th Edition. New York: CBS College Publishing. ii. Druehl, Louis. 2000. Pacific Seaweeds: A Guide to Common Seaweeds of the West Coast. Madeira Park: Harbour Publishing. iii. Cross, Stephen. 2004. Englewood, Beaver Cove – Proposed Habitat Restoration & Compensation Project in Support of a Section 35(2) HADD Authorization. 4 pp. iv. Fisheries and Oceans Canada. 2019. Fish and Fish Habitat Protection Policy Statement. 36pp. v. Fisheries and Oceans Canada, 2012. Action Plan for the Northern Abalone (Haliotis kamtschatkana) in Canada Species at Risk Act Action Plan Series. Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Ottawa. vii+65 pp. vi. Fisheries and Oceans Canada, 2011, Approved Work Practices (AWP) for Re-activated Log Dumps in Marine Waters of British Columbia - Appendix B – Marine Assessment Protocol for Assessing Fish Habitat and Wood Debris Deposition for Re-Activated Log Dumps. Pp 7 – 14. vii. Fisheries and Oceans Canada, 2005. DFO Marine Fish Habitat Information Requirements (HIR) for Finfish Aquaculture Projects. Department of Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO) August 2005: 62 p. viii. Fisheries and Oceans Canada. 2003. Guidebook: Environmentally Sustainable Log Handling in British Columbia. 88pp. ix. Fisheries and Oceans Canada, 2002. Practitioners Guide to Habitat Compensation: For DFO Habitat Management Staff. 22 pp. x. Fisheries and Oceans Canada. 1986. The Department of Fisheries and Oceans Policy for the Management of Fish Habitat. 28pp. xi. Harbo, Rick. 1999. Whelks to Whales – Coastal Marine Life of the Pacific Northwest. Madeira Park: Harbour Publishing. xii. Kozloff, E.N. 1983. Seashore Life of the Northern Pacific Coast: An Illustrated Guide to Northern California, Oregon, Washington and British Columbia. Vancouver: Douglas and McIntyre. xiii. Lamb, A. and Edgell P. 1986. Coastal Fishes of the Pacific Northwest. Madeira Park: Harbour Publishing. xiv. Lassard J. and Campbell A. 2005. Impact Assessment Protocols for Works and Developments Potentially Affecting Abalone and their Habitat. Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Stock Assessment Division, PBS, Nanaimo. Habitat Assessment / Sub-tidal Review 13 43 WFP / Port McNeill Breakwater Large Vessel Ramp Construction Appendix 1 – Video Log Video Time (Obs) Depth Remarks Depth (Correct) Depth (h:mm:ss) (ft) (ft) DVD Track #1 - Introduction 0:00:00 Survey Title Page -Port McNeill Large Vessel Ramp - Pre-Construction Habitat Assessment 0:00:19 Survey For: Integrum Recovery and Salvage 0:00:40 Survey Team: BCL Biotechnologies Ltd. 0:01:06 Survey Date: January 11, 2021 DVD Track #2 - Area Overview 0:01:12 Area Overview - British Columbia / Vancouver Island (North) 0:01:23 Area Overview - Vancouver Island (North) / Port McNeill 0:01:34 Area Overview - Port McNeill / WFP Breakwater 0:01:44 Area Overview - WFP Breakwater DVD Track #3 - Transect #1 - Inner Breakwater (January 11, 2021 12:21 p.m. Tide: +16.0') 0:01:57 Aerial Overview - Transect Location, Dive Direction / GPS Coordinates 0:02:08 Beach overview, large angular boulder fill, near top of breakwater 0:02:14 0 16 0m - Steep angular boulder to shot rock (fill material) upper inter-tidal zone 5m - Gently sloping clean angular boulders, shot rock (fill material), sand, larger boulders with sparse 0:02:38 -2 14 barnacles 0:03:15 -5 11 10m - Clean angular cobble / fine sand interface, few larger boulders with sparse barnacles 0:03:59 15m - Gentle slope clean sand / shell fragments, sparse gravel / large wood debris 0:04:22 -7 9 20m - Gentle slope clean sand / pea gravel, few shell fragments, sparse brown branching algae 0:04:54 25m - Gentle slope clean sand, patchy gravel 0:05:15 -8 8 30m - Gentle slope clean sand / pea gravel, few shell fragments 0:05:42 35m - Gentle slope clean sand / patchy pea gravel, sparse sea lettuce 0:06:02 -8 8 40m - Gentle slope clean sand / pea gravel Habitat Assessment / Sub-tidal Review 14 44 WFP / Port McNeill Breakwater Large Vessel Ramp Construction Appendix 1 – Video Log 0:06:27 45m - Gentle slope sand / pea gravel, thin patches dark brown diatoms, few historic sea star excavations 50m - Gentle slope sand / sparse pea gravel, thin patches dark brown diatoms, few historic sea star 0:06:45 -9 7 excavations 0:07:07 55m - Gentle slope sand / sparse pea gravel, few shell fragments 0:07:25 -9 7 60m - Gentle slope sand / sparse pea gravel, few excavations (sea stars) with fine sediments 0:07:47 65m - Gentle slope fine sediments over pea gravel, sparse sea lettuce 0:08:08 -10 6 70m - Gentle slope fine sediments over pea gravel, sparse wood debris, dusting organic sediments 0:08:32 75m - Gentle slope fine sediments over pea gravel, sparse sea lettuce / thick dark brown diatoms 0:08:50 -10 6 80m - Gentle slope fine sediments, sparse sea lettuce, few sea star excavations 0:09:15 85m - Gentle slope fine sediments over pea gravel, sparse sea lettuce 0:09:40 -10 6 90m - Gentle slope fine sediments over pea gravel, sparse sea lettuce 0:10:05 95m - Gentle slope fine sediments over pea gravel, sparse sea lettuce 0:10:27 -11 5 100m - Gentle slope fine sediments over pea gravel, sparse sea lettuce, historic log 0:10:58 -11 100m - Survey swim to east (towards breakwater), gentle slope fine sediments, sparse coarse wood debris 0:11:08 -10 6 ~ 1/2 way towards breakwater from transect line, fine sediments / pea gravel, sparse wood debris 0:11:54 -9 Gravel / shell fragments, few large boulders with barnacles, base of breakwater fill steep bank 0:12:30 0 16 Surface, steep angular large clean boulders, brow log near Transect 2 attachment point DVD Track #4 - Transect #2 - Mid-Breakwater (Option #2) (January 11, 2021 12:33 p.m. Tide: +15.6') 0:12:38 Aerial Overview - Transect Location, Dive Direction / GPS Coordinates 0:12:49 Beach overview, steep clean angular boulder fill area at loading ramp brow log 0:12:55 0 16 Steep angular clean boulder fill, sparse barnacles 0:13:27 Steep clean angular boulders / shot rock fill, sparse barnacles 0:14:01 0 16 5m - Steep angular boulders, sparse green algae, discarded steel cable, begin descend 0:14:34 5m - Clean shot rock fill / gravel, large boulders with dense barnacles, discarded corroded cable 0:15:02 -6 10 10m - Clean shot rock fill / gravel, few large boulders with dense barnacles 0:15:32 15m - Shot rock / thick coarse wood debris junction, dusting fine sediments 0:15:53 -10 6 20m - Fine sediments / pea gravel, coarse wood debris / few logs, dusting coarse organic sediments 0:16:17 25m - Thick fine sediments, sparse coarse wood debris, dusting coarse organic sediments 0:16:36 -11 5 30m - Thick fine sediments, coarse wood debris, dusting coarse organic sediments, flatfish 0:17:04 35m - Thick fine sediments, sparse pea gravel, small patches white bacteria, sparse sea lettuce 0:17:20 -12 4 40m - Thick fine sediments, small patches white bacteria 0:17:45 45m - Thick fine sediments, broken off piling on bottom, plumose anemones 0:18:03 -12 4 50m - Thick fine sediments, fine / coarse wood debris, dusting coarse organic sediments, sparse sea lettuce 0:18:28 55m - Thick fine sediments, fine / coarse wood debris, dusting coarse organic sediments, small patches thick Habitat Assessment / Sub-tidal Review 15 45 WFP / Port McNeill Breakwater Large Vessel Ramp Construction Appendix 1 – Video Log white bacteria, thick dark brown diatoms 0:18:54 -16 0 60m - Thick fine sediments, fine / coarse wood debris, dusting coarse organic sediments 0:19:21 65m - Thick fine sediments, dense dark brown diatom cover, frilled / plumose anemones 70m - Thick fine sediments, thick coarse wood debris, cover coarse organic sediments, frilled / plumose 0:19:44 -21 -5 anemones 75m - Thick fine sediments, thick coarse wood debris, cover coarse organic sediments / diatoms, frilled / 0:20:04 plumose anemones 80m - Thick fine sediments, thick coarse wood debris, cover coarse organic sediments / diatoms, frilled / 0:20:23 -23 -7 plumose anemones 0:20:45 85m - Thick coarse wood debris / decaying logs, thick dusting coarse organic sediments / diatoms 0:21:03 -22 -6 90m - Thick coarse wood debris, thick dusting coarse organic sediments / diatoms 0:21:24 90m - Thick coarse wood debris, thick dusting coarse organic sediments 0:21:42 -22 -6 100m - Thick coarse wood debris, few logs, thick dusting coarse organic sediments / diatoms DVD Track #5 - Transect #3 - Outer Breakwater (Option #1 - Best) (January 11, 2021 12:59 p.m. Tide: +14.6') 0:22:00 Aerial Overview - Transect Location, Dive Direction / GPS Coordinates 0:22:11 Beach overview, gentle sloping (excavated), angular boulders / shot rock fill, stacked logs (boomsticks) 0:22:18 0 15 Surface, beach overview, sloping angular boulder / shot rock fill, stacked boomstics, supplies, begin descend 0:22:56 -2 13 5m - Clean angular boulder / shot rock fill, discarded cables, sparse barnacles 0:23:10 -9 6 10m - Sloping angular boulders / shot rock fill, barnacles, few cables 0:23:39 15m - Base of shot rock fill, fine sediment covering, sparse wood debris 20m - Thick fine sediments, few angular cobble / coarse wood debris, thick dusting fine sediment / dark brown 0:24:00 -17 -2 diatoms 0:24:26 -20 -5 25m - Thick fine sediments, coarse wood debris, dusting fine sediments, sparse sea lettuce 30m - Thick fine sediments, sparse coarse wood debris, dusting fine sediments, sparse sea lettuce, plumose 0:24:49 -22 -7 anemone 0:25:14 35m - Thick fine sediments, few wood chunks, dusting fine sediments, sparse sea lettuce, frilled anemone 0:25:30 -24 -9 40m - Thick fine sediments, sparse sea lettuce / sponges 0:25:56 45m - Thick fine sediments, sparse sea lettuce, flat fish 0:26:19 -24 -9 50m - Thick fine sediments 0:26:46 55m - Thick fine sediments, sparse sea lettuce, brown branching algae (stalks only) 0:27:01 -24 -9 60m - Thick fine sediments, brown branching algae (stalks only), sparse small patches white bacteria 0:27:20 65m - Thick fine sediments, brown branching algae (stalks only) 70m - Thick fine sediments, sparse coarse wood debris, plumose anemones, brown branching algae (stalks 0:27:34 -24 -9 only) 0:27:54 75m - Thick fine sediments, brown branching algae (stalks only) 80m - Thick fine sediments, brown branching algae (stalks only), sparse drift sea lettuce, sparse small patches 0:28:11 -25 -10 white bacteria Habitat Assessment / Sub-tidal Review 16 46 WFP / Port McNeill Breakwater Large Vessel Ramp Construction Appendix 1 – Video Log 0:28:33 85m - Thick fine sediments, brown branching algae (stalks only), sparse drift sea lettuce 0:28:44 -25 -10 90m - Thick fine sediments, brown branching algae (stalks only), sparse drift sea lettuce 0:29:10 95m - Thick fine sediments, brown branching algae (stalks only), sparse drift sea lettuce 0:29:26 -27 -12 100m - Thick fine sediments, sparse eelgrass patch, few shells (partially buried) DVD Track #6 - Shallow Near-shore Swim Survey Survey Title Page -Port McNeill Large Vessel Ramp - Pre-Construction Habitat Assessment - Shallow Swim 0:29:50 Survey DVD Track #7 - Transect #1 to #2 (January 11, 2021 12:32 p.m. Tide: +15.6') 0:30:05 Aerial Overview - Transect Location, Dive Direction / GPS Coordinates 0:30:16 -8 8 Boulders / gravel / shot rock at breakwater, discarded steel cable, few angular boulders with sparse barnacles DVD Track #8 - Transect #2 to #3 (January 11, 2021 12:42 p.m. Tide: +15.1') 0:30:47 Aerial Overview - Transect Location, Dive Direction / GPS Coordinates 100m - Transect #2, thick coarse wood debris, fine sediment / diatom layer covering, swim back towards 0:30:59 -22 -7 breakwater 0:31:17 Thick fine sediments, logs / coarse wood debris, thick dusting fine sediments / diatoms 0:31:37 -22 -7 Thick fine sediments, thick coarse wood debris, dusting fine sediments / diatoms, decaying logs 0:32:01 Thick coarse wood debris, frilled anemones, thick dusting fine sediments / diatoms 0:32:16 Thick coarse wood debris, plumose / frilled anemones, thick dusting fine sediments / diatoms, Dungeness crab 0:32:33 -22 -7 Thick fine sediments, coarse wood debris, dusting fine sediments / diatoms, sparse mats thick white bacteria Discarded prawn traps (2), thick mats white bacteria (50% - 80% cover), plumose anemones on coarse wood 0:32:47 debris 0:33:05 -18 -3 Crab trap suspended from dock, thick coarse wood debris, white bacteria mats, broken off pilings 0:33:30 -12 3 Corroded steel pipe, plumose anemones, thick fine sediments 0:33:48 Clean shot rock fill / fine sediment interface, steel pipe (corroded) / barnacles 0:34:10 Steep angular boulder bank, dense barnacles 0:34:21 0 15 Surface near A-frame structure, clean angular boulders (top of breakwater - fill area) DVD Track #9 - Credits ` 0:34:27 Closing Title Page & Survey Credits 0:35:00 End of Survey - Port McNeill Large Vessel Ramp Construction Habitat Assessment / Sub-tidal Review 17 47 WFP / Port McNeill Breakwater Large Vessel Ramp Construction Appendix 2 – Species List Observed Species (2021) Abundance Rating Common Name Scientific Classification Total area Total Transect #1 Transect #2 Transect #3 Transect Transect #2 to #3 to #2 Transect Bacteria White Bacteria Begiattoa f a f a Diatoms Not identified a a a f a Algae / Kelp Green Mat Algae Not Determined r r Brown Branching Not Determined f r a Sea Lettuce Ulva spp. f f f a Sponges Yellow Sponge Not Determined r r Anemones Plumose Anemone Metridium farcimen f f f f Frilled Anemone Metridium senile f f r f Crabs / Shrimps Dungeness Crab Cancer magister s Acorn Barnacle Balanus glandula f r a f f Fish Flatfish Starry Platichthys stellatus r s s Flounder Abundance Rating (AR) s = single (1 individual / transect) r = rare (< 5 individuals / transect) f = few (5 - 10 individuals / transect) a = abundant (> 10 individuals / transect) Habitat Assessment / Sub-tidal Review 18 48 WFP / Port McNeill Breakwater Large Vessel Ramp Construction Appendix 3 – Bathymetry Profiles Corrected Depth : Distance (m) WFP / Port McNeill Breakwater- Transect #1 6 5 4 3 2 1 Depth (m) Transect #1 0 Datum -1 -2 -3 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Distance (m) Corrected Depth : Distance (m) WFP / Port McNeill Breakwater- Transect #2 6 5 4 3 2 1 Depth (m) Transect #2 0 Datum -1 -2 -3 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Distance (m) Habitat Assessment / Sub-tidal Review 19 WFP / Port McNeill Breakwater Large Vessel Ramp Construction Appendix 3 – Bathymetry Profiles Corrected Depth : Distance (m) WFP / Port McNeill Breakwater - Transect #3 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Depth (m) -1 Transect #3 -2 Datum -3 -4 -5 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Distance (m) Corrected Depth : Distance (m) WFP / Port McNeill Breakwater- All Transects 6 5 4 Datum 3 Transect #1 2 Transect #2 1 0 Transect #3 Depth (m) -1 -2 -3 -4 -5 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Distance (m) Habitat Assessment / Sub-tidal Review 20 WFP / Port McNeill Breakwater Large Vessel Ramp Construction Appendix 4 – Original Proposal & Recommendations Habitat Assessment / Sub-tidal Review 21 WFP / Port McNeill Breakwater Large Vessel Ramp Construction Appendix 4 – Original Proposal & Recommendations Habitat Assessment / Sub-tidal Review 22 WFP / Port McNeill Breakwater Large Vessel Ramp Construction Appendix 4 – Original Proposal & Recommendations Habitat Assessment / Sub-tidal Review 23 WFP / Port McNeill Breakwater Large Vessel Ramp Construction Appendix 4 – Original Proposal & Recommendations Habitat Assessment / Sub-tidal Review 24 WFP / Port McNeill Breakwater Large Vessel Ramp Construction Appendix 4 – Original Proposal & Recommendations Habitat Assessment / Sub-tidal Review 25 WFP / Port McNeill Breakwater Large Vessel Ramp Construction Appendix 4 – Original Proposal & Recommendations Habitat Assessment / Sub-tidal Review 26 WFP / Port McNeill Breakwater Large Vessel Ramp Construction Appendix 4 – Original Proposal & Recommendations Habitat Assessment / Sub-tidal Review 27 WFP / Port McNeill Breakwater Large Vessel Ramp Construction Appendix 4 – Original Proposal & Recommendations Habitat Assessment / Sub-tidal Review 28 Average Monthly Revenue 2019 2020 2021 FebruaryX0A0C $6,922 $5,399 $3,333 Annual $66,786 $46,934 $7,243 Change -6.0% -29.7% -84.6% Projected $9,000 Monthly Revenue Year to Year 2019 - 2021 $7,900 $8,000 $6,922 $7,000 $5,995 $5,826 $5,825 $5,882 $6,000 $5,442 $5,399 $5,324 $5,313 $5,435 $5,097 $5,062 $4,878 $4,933 $5,000 $4,270 $4,261 $4,077 $4,138 $4,198 $3,910 $3,855 $4,000 $3,333 $3,165 $3,000 $2,000 $1,000 $521 $0 $0 2019 2020 2021 59 Mount Waddington Transit Revenue Trends 2021 Revenue Source Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Year to Date Projected Farebox $1,934 $1,386 $3,320 $19,920.00 Ticket Sales -$126 $0 -$126 X0A1C $5,132.56 Pass Sales $886 $731 $1,617 $9,699.00 BC Bus Passes $1,216 $1,216 $2,432 $14,592.00 Total $3,910 $3,333 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $7,243 $43,455.00 *estimate/average Projected: -84.6% 2020 Revenue Source Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Year to Date Farebox $2,681 $2,372 $1,296 $281 $0 $2,169 $2,426 $1,734 $1,725 $1,940 $1,648 $1,678 $19,951 Ticket Sales $1,008 $819 $0 $0 $0 $84 $0 $2,184 $0 $1,418 $0 $903 $6,416 Pass Sales $538 $940 $470 $240 $0 $397 $496 $475 $1,074 $1,153 $991 $464 $7,235 BC Bus Passes $1,216 $1,268 $1,399 $0 $0 $1,427 $1,216 $1,603 $1,399 $1,372 $1,216 $1,216 $13,332 Total $5,442 $5,399 $3,165 $521 $0 $4,077 $4,138 $5,995 $4,198 $5,882 $3,855 $4,261 $46,934 *estimate/average Cash and passes were sold in March, but returned after cutoff date for March Reports -29.7% No collection of fares (COVID-19) from March 21 - May 31 2019 Revenue Source Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Total Farebox $3,017 $2,814 $2,922 $3,154 $3,115 $2,841 $3,385 $3,027 $2,456 $2,866 $2,827 $2,577 $35,002 Ticket Sales $32 $1,780 $84 $432 $2,879 $189 $262 $52 $53 $63 $126 $568 $6,518 Pass Sales $746 $1,142 $1,054 $976 $538 $913 $834 $674 $417 $736 $532 $866 $9,426 BC Bus Passes $1,083 $1,186 $1,265 $1,265 $1,369 $1,370 $1,344 $1,345 $1,345 $1,397 $1,448 $1,424 $15,840 Total $4,878 $6,922 $5,324 $5,826 $7,900 $5,313 $5,825 $5,097 $4,270 $5,062 $4,933 $5,435 $66,786 -6.0% 60 Average Passengers per Month: 2019 2020 2021 FebruaryX1A0C 2086 2173 1594 Annual 27639 20674 3158 Change 1% -25% -85% Monthly Ridership Year to Year - 2019 - 2021 3000 2500 2494 2499 2416 2445 2383 2369 2325 2275 2251 2173 2202 2194 2086 2083 2000 1909 1910 1853 1847 1814 1671 1701 1594 1610 1500 1446 1163 1000 983 500 0 2019 2020 2021 61 Mount Waddington Transit Ridership Trends 2021 January February March April May June July August September October November December 2021 Total Route 1 to Port McNeill 364 326 345 Route 1 Saturdays 0 0 0 Route 2 to Port Hardy 500 388 888 Route 2 Saturdays 0 0 0 Route 4-Ft Rupert 245 252 497 Route 4-Airport Extension 0 0 0 Route 5-Coal Harbour/Quatsino 408 267 675 Route 5-Coal Harbour Saturdays 44 17 61 Route 6-Woss/Mount Cain 23 24 47 Route 11-PH Local 183 200 383 Route 12-PM Local 139 117 256 HandyDART-PH 1 1 2 HandyDART-PM 2 2 4 2021 Monthly Total 1909 1594 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3158 2020 January February March April May June July August September October November December 2020 Total Route 1 to Port McNeill 486 421 400 171 212 273 305 296 365 385 301 287 3902 Route 1 Saturdays 0 0 0 7 8 17 8 20 10 13 7 0 90 Route 2 to Port Hardy 519 425 342 135 190 230 325 265 333 398 370 308 3840 Route 2 Saturdays 0 0 0 5 7 4 15 25 14 12 12 0 94 Route 4-Ft Rupert 368 361 299 218 253 310 400 323 284 295 252 267 3630 Route 4-Airport Extension 7 8 4 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 3 1 27 Route 5-Coal Harbour/Quatsino 515 484 440 244 261 386 488 446 444 462 402 425 4997 Route 5-Coal Harbour Saturdays 34 38 25 24 35 24 51 38 54 48 18 24 413 Route 6-Woss/Mount Cain 42 59 32 ------0 - 13 146 Route 11-PH Local 186 181 144 50 87 85 129 132 153 163 189 161 1660 Route 12-PM Local 211 178 151 129 106 117 132 122 155 134 147 123 1705 HandyDART-PH 4 10 6 0 4 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 26 HandyDART-PM 11 8 4 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 144 2020 Monthly Total 2383 2173 1847 983 1163 1446 1853 1671 1814 1910 1701 1610 20674 2019 January February March April May June July August September October November December 2019 Total Route 1 to Port McNeill 460 395 444 452 480 421 504 445 399 514 482 409 5405 Route 1 Saturdays 0 0 0 18 15 17 6 21 23 18 23 0 141 Route 2 to Port Hardy 480 410 494 477 466 432 469 470 405 496 474 432 5505 Route 2 Saturdays 0 0 0 32 20 17 13 12 19 21 16 150 Route 4-Ft Rupert 411 355 380 407 354 366 371 325 335 252 231 417 4204 Route 4-Airport Extension 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 139 107 15 290 Route 5-Coal Harbour/Quatsino 603 490 518 568 702 644 650 556 473 567 496 500 6767 Route 5-Coal Harbour Saturdays 23 25 35 32 54 62 49 48 44 38 32 37 479 Route 6-Woss/Mount Cain 56 50 43 - - - - - 0 - 48 197 Route 11-PH Local 169 161 146 173 178 161 161 145 151 181 146 165 1937 Route 12-PM Local 205 191 207 203 204 188 202 212 187 251 174 164 2388 HandyDART-PH 4 5 4 1 8 8 11 8 10 12 13 2 86 HandyDART-PM 5 4 4 6 13 9 9 9 8 10 8 5 90 2019 Monthly Total 2416 2086 2275 2369 2494 2325 2445 2251 2083 2499 2202 2194 27639 62 2021 Volunteer Transportation Network/HandyDart Trip Summary Total Total Community - Trips (T) /Clients (C) HandyDART Month Lift Van Trips Clients Port Hardy Port McNeill Alert Bay Malcolm Island Woss Fort Rupert Port Alice Port Hardy Port McNeill Int w/ VTN T C T C T C T C T C T C T C AM PM AM PM January 31 49 0 0 0 7 7 0 0 0 0 8 26 0 0 16 16 0 1 1 1 0 February 15 32 0 0 0 4 4 0 0 0 0 6 23 0 0 4 4 0 0 0 0 March April May June July August September October November December TOTAL 46 81 0 0 0 11 11 0 0 0 0 14 49 0 0 20 20 0 1 1 1 0 Riders/trip 1.8 1.0 3.5 1.0 Projected 276 486 0 0 0 66 66 0 0 0 0 84 294 0 0 120 120 0 6 6 6 0 Change -16% -27% -100% -100% -100% -18% -56% 0 0 -100% -100% 45% -2% -100% -100% -12% -25% -100% -33% -65% -14% 0 63 7-MILE LANDFILL MONTHLY TONNAGE SUMMARY FOR Mar 2021 MONTH 3 PROJECTIONS NOT SEASONALLY ADJUSTED Mar 1 to Mar 31 2121 UP TO Mar PRO-RATED BUDGET ANNUAL VARIANCE % WASTE MATERIALS MANAGED IN THE LANDFILL (2021) 31, 2021 ANNUAL PROJECTION STREAM AREA - TONNES PROJECTION LANDFILL 116.51 1071.91 4288 7000 -38.7% 59% GENERAL REFUSE FROM BELLA BELLA 7.24 79.92 320 464 -31.1% GENERAL REFUSE FROM KLEMTU 0.00 18.95 76 136 -44.3% OTHER MATERIAL LANDFILLED FROM OUTSIDE OF RDMW 0.00 0.00 0 100 FEE EXEMPT PUBLIC CLEANUP (NOT ACCOUNTED IN LANDFILL TONNAGE ) 0.00 0.55 2 100 -97.8% 0.0% TOTAL AMOUNT SENT TO ACTIVE LANDFILL FACE 123.75 1171.33 4685.32 7800.00 RECYCLABLES AND STEWARDSHIP MATERIALS DIVERTED AT LANDFILL FACE 0.00 0.00 0 50 -100.0% 0.0% WOODWASTE DIVERTED AT LANDFILL FACE 3.33 15.14 61 200 -69.7% 0.8% METAL DIVERTED AT LANDFILL FACE 3.07 5.45 22 50 -56.4% OTHER MATERIALS DIVERTED AT LANDFILL 2.84 2.84 11 200 -94.3% TOTAL AMOUNT OF MATERIAL DIVERTED AT THE ACTIVE LANDFILL FACE 9.24 23.43 93.72 500.00 -81.3% TOTAL AMOUNT ACTUALLY LANDFILLED 114.51 1147.90 4591.60 7300.00 -37.1% 64% MATERIALS DIVERTED FROM THE LANDFILL - TONNES TOTAL AMOUNT OF MATERIAL DIVERTED AT THE ACTIVE LANDFILL FACE 9.24 23.43 94 500 -81.3% OUTBOUND METAL 0.00 0.00 0 150 -100.0% 0% SALVAGED MATERIALS 0.04 2.95 12 5 135.9% 0% CREOSOTE LOGS 0.00 1.91 8 5 52.8% 0% PAPER/WAX CARDBOARD - COMPOSTABLE 0.00 0.00 0 250 -100.0% 0% WOODWASTE FOR CHIPPING AT $25/TONNE 14.35 99.04 396 500 -20.8% 5% COMPOSTABLE MATERIALS 31.32 307.62 1230 1100 11.9% 17% FINE GARDEN WASTE (NO CHARGE) 0.36 0.36 1 100 -98.6% 0% RECYCLED MATERIALS 0.00 20.10 80 700 -88.5% 1% ASPHALT SHINGLES 1.69 15.48 62 75 -17.4% 1% ASBESTOS TO ASBESTOS DISPOSAL AREA 0.00 0.00 0 100 -100.0% 0% MMBC MATERIAL 20.92 185.20 741 300 146.9% 10% TOTAL DIVERTED 55.31 656.09 2624.36 3785.00 -30.7% 36% Mar 1 to Mar 31 2021 UP TO Mar ANNUAL BUDGET VARIANCE % WASTE (2021) 31, 2021 PROJECTION PROJECTION STREAM PRO-RATED OTHER MATERIALS: ADDITIONAL TO FROM ACTUALS LANDFILL - TONNES SOIL FOR REMEDIATION 0.00 0.00 0 100 -100.0% 0% SOIL FOR DIRECT DEPOSIT 0.00 0.00 0 100 -100.0% 0% TOTAL IMPORTED FILL 0.00 0.00 0.00 200.00 -100.0% 0% TOTAL TONNAGE MANAGED AT 7 MILE LANDFILL 169.82 1803.99 7215.96 11285.00 -36.1% 64