DOCSLIB.ORG

Armenia Criminal Code As of 23 May 2018

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Strasbourg, 12 March 2021 CDL-REF(2021)022 Opinion No. 1026 / 2021 Engl. only EUROPEAN COMMISSION FOR DEMOCRACY THROUGH LAW (VENICE COMMISSION) ARMENIA CRIMINAL CODE AS OF 23 MAY 2018 (*) (*) Translation provided by the Armenian authorities This document will not be distributed at the meeting. Please bring this copy. www.venice.coe.int CDL-REF(2021)022 - 2 - CRIMINAL CODE OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA (Adopted on 18 April 2003) GENERAL PART SECTION 1 CRIMINAL STATUTE CHAPTER 1 TASKS AND PRINCIPLES OF CRIMINAL LEGISLATION Article 1. Criminal legislation of the Republic of Armenia 1. The criminal legislation of the Republic of Armenia consists of this Code. New laws that envisage criminal liability shall be included in the Criminal Code of the Republic of Armenia. 2. The Criminal Code of the Republic of Armenia is based on the Constitution of the Republic of Armenia and on principles and norms of international law. Article 2. Tasks of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Armenia 1. Tasks of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Armenia shall be as follows: to protect human and citizens’ rights and freedoms from criminal encroachments, rights of legal entities, property, environment, public order and security, constitutional order, peace and safety of humanity, as well as to prevent crimes. 2. For the purpose of implementing these tasks, the Criminal Code of the Republic of Armenia stipulates the ground for criminal liability and the principles of criminal legislation, determines what acts dangerous to the public are deemed to be crimes and defines the types of punishment and other criminal-law enforcement measures for commission thereof. Article 3. Ground for criminal liability The sole ground for criminal liability is criminal offence, i.e. the commission of an act that contains all elements of corpus delicti provided for in the criminal statute. Article 4. Principles of criminal legislation The Criminal Code of the Republic of Armenia is based on the principles of legality, equality before the law, inevitability of liability, personal liability, fault based liability, individualisation of justice and liability and humanism. - 3 - CDL-REF(2021)022 Article 5. Principle of legality 1. The criminality of an act, its punishability and other criminal law effects shall be determined only by the criminal statute. 2. Application of the criminal statute by analogy shall be prohibited. Article 6. Principle of equality before the law Persons having committed a criminal offence shall be equal before the law and shall be subject to criminal liability, irrespective of gender, race, colour, ethnic or social origin, genetic features, language, religion, world outlook, political and other views, membership to national minority, property status, birth, disability or other circumstances of personal or social nature. (Article 6 edited by HO-3-N of 5 February 2013) Article 7. Principle of inevitability of liability 1. Each person having committed a criminal offence shall be subject to punishment or other criminal–law enforcement provided for in the Criminal Code of the Republic of Armenia. 2. Release from criminal liability and punishment shall be available only in case of grounds and conditions provided for in the Criminal Code of the Republic of Armenia. Article 8. Principle of personal liability A person shall be subject to criminal liability only for the criminal offence committed by himself or herself. Article 9. Principle of fault-based liability 1. A person shall be subject to criminal liability only for action or inaction dangerous to the public and for consequences — dangerous to the public — in respect of which his or her guilt is established by the competent court. 2. Objective incrimination, i.e. criminal liability for causing harm without guilt, shall be prohibited. Article 10. Principle of individualisation of justice and liability 1. Punishment and other criminal-law enforcement measures applied to a person having committed a criminal offence must be fair, i.e. appropriate to the gravity of criminal offence, circumstances under which it has been committed, personality of the criminal, must be necessary and sufficient to correct him or her and prevent new crimes. 2. It shall be forbidden to try a person twice for the same crime. (Article 10 amended by HO-97-N of 9 June 2004) CDL-REF(2021)022 - 4 - Article 11. Principle of humanism 1. The Criminal Code of the Republic of Armenia shall serve to ensure physical, mental, material, ecological and other types of safety of a human being. 2. No one shall be subjected to torture or cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. CHAPTER 2 OPERATION OF CRIMINAL STATUTE IN TIME AND SPACE Article 12. Operation of criminal statute in time 1. Criminality and punishability of an act shall be determined by the criminal statute in force at the time of commission thereof. 2. Time of committing a criminal offence shall be deemed to be the time of committing an action (inaction) dangerous to the public, irrespective of the moment the consequences ensue. Article 13. Retroactive effect of criminal statute 1. The statute removing criminality of an act, mitigating punishment or otherwise ameliorating the conditions of a person having committed a criminal offence has a retroactive effect, i.e. applies to persons having committed such an act — before the entry into force of that statute, including to those who serve or have served their punishment, but have conviction. 2. The statute defining criminality of an act, aggravating the punishment or otherwise deteriorating the condition of a person having committed a criminal offence has no retroactive effect. 3. The statute partially mitigating liability and meanwhile aggravating liability has retroactive effect only in respect of the part that mitigates liability. Article 14. Operation of criminal statute in respect of persons having committed a criminal offence within the territory of the Republic of Armenia 1. A person having committed a criminal offence within the territory of the Republic of Armenia shall be subject to liability under the Criminal Code of the Republic of Armenia. 2. A criminal offence shall be considered as committed within the territory of the Republic of Armenia when it has been: (1) commenced, continued or finished within the territory of the Republic of Armenia; (2) committed in complicity with persons who were engaged in criminal activity within the territory of another State. 3. The liability of a person who commits a criminal offence within the territory of the Republic of Armenia and other states shall ensue under the Criminal Code of the Republic of Armenia, where he or she was brought to liability within the territory of the Republic of Armenia and unless otherwise provided for by international treaties of the Republic of Armenia. - 5 - CDL-REF(2021)022 4. A person having committed a criminal offence on board a ship under the flag of the Republic of Armenia or carrying distinguishing emblem of the Republic of Armenia or on board a flying airplane or other air device — irrespective of its location — shall be subject to criminal liability under the Criminal Code of the Republic of Armenia, unless otherwise provided for by international treaties of the Republic of Armenia. A person having committed a criminal offence on board the military ship or airplane of the Republic of Armenia — irrespective of its location — shall be also subject to liability under the Criminal Code of the Republic of Armenia. 5. Where foreign diplomatic representatives and other persons enjoying diplomatic immunity commit a criminal offence within the territory of the Republic of Armenia, the issue of subjecting them to criminal liability shall be settled in accordance with norms of international law. (Article 14 supplemented by HO-97-N of 9 June 2004) Article 15. Operation of criminal statute in respect of persons having committed a criminal offence outside the territory of the Republic of Armenia 1. Citizens of the Republic of Armenia and stateless persons permanently residing in the Republic of Armenia, having committed a criminal offence outside the territory of the Republic of Armenia, shall be subject to criminal liability under the Criminal Code of the Republic of Armenia, where the act committed by them is recognised as a crime under the legislation of the state where the crime was committed and where they were not sentenced in another state. When sentencing the aforementioned persons, the punishment may not exceed the upper threshold of punishment provided for by the law of the foreign state in the territory of which the criminal offence was committed. 2. Citizens of the Republic of Armenia being outside the territory of the Republic of Armenia and stateless persons permanently residing in the Republic of Armenia shall be subject to criminal liability under the Criminal Code of the Republic of Armenia for committing criminal offences provided for in Articles 190, 200, 201, 311-313, 384, 386-391, 393 to 397 of this Code, regardless of whether that act is provided for or is not provided for by the Criminal Code of the state where the criminal offence was committed. 3. Foreign nationals and stateless persons not permanently residing in the Republic of Armenia, having committed a criminal offence outside the territory of the Republic of Armenia, shall be subject to criminal liability under the Criminal Code of the Republic of Armenia, where they have committed: (1) crimes which are provided for by international treaties of the Republic of Armenia; (2) grave or particularly grave crimes which are against the interests of the Republic of Armenia or rights and freedoms of citizens of the Republic of Armenia. 4. Norms stipulated in part 3 of this Article shall apply, where foreign nationals and stateless persons not permanently residing in the Republic of Armenia have not been convicted of the CDL-REF(2021)022 - 6 - crime concerned in another state and are subject to criminal liability in the territory of the Republic of Armenia.
Recommended publications
  • Federal Law Enforcement Officers, 2016

    Federal Law Enforcement Officers, 2016

    U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Bureau of Justice Statistics October 2019, NCJ 251922 Bureau of Justice Statistics Bureau Federal Law Enforcement Ofcers, 2016 – Statistical Tables Connor Brooks, BJS Statistician s of the end of fscal-year 2016, federal FIGURE 1 agencies in the United States and Distribution of full-time federal law enforcement U.S. territories employed about 132,000 ofcers, by department or branch, 2016 Afull-time law enforcement ofcers. Federal law enforcement ofcers were defned as any federal Department of ofcers who were authorized to make arrests Homeland Security and carry frearms. About three-quarters of Department of Justice federal law enforcement ofcers (about 100,000) Other executive- provided police protection as their primary branch agencies function. Four in fve federal law enforcement ofcers, regardless of their primary function, Independent agencies worked for either the Department of Homeland · Security (47% of all ofcers) or the Department Judicial branch Tables Statistical of Justice (33%) (fgure 1, table 1). Legislative branch Findings in this report are from the 2016 0 10 20 30 40 50 Census of Federal Law Enforcement Ofcers Percent (CFLEO). Te Bureau of Justice Statistics conducted the census, collecting data on Note: See table 1 for counts and percentages. Source: Bureau of Justice Statistics, Census of Federal Law 83 agencies. Of these agencies, 41 were Ofces Enforcement Ofcers, 2016. of Inspectors General, which provide oversight of federal agencies and activities. Te tables in this report provide statistics on the number, functions, and demographics of federal law enforcement ofcers. Highlights In 2016, there were about 100,000 full-time Between 2008 and 2016, the Amtrak Police federal law enforcement ofcers in the United had the largest percentage increase in full-time States and U.S.
  • Flash Reports on Labour Law January 2017 Summary and Country Reports

    Flash Reports on Labour Law January 2017 Summary and Country Reports

    Flash Report 01/2017 Flash Reports on Labour Law January 2017 Summary and country reports EUROPEAN COMMISSION Directorate DG Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion Unit B.2 – Working Conditions Flash Report 01/2017 Europe Direct is a service to help you find answers to your questions about the European Union. Freephone number (*): 00 800 6 7 8 9 10 11 (*) The information given is free, as are most calls (though some operators, phone boxes or hotels may charge you). LEGAL NOTICE This document has been prepared for the European Commission however it reflects the views only of the authors, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein. More information on the European Union is available on the Internet (http://www.europa.eu). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2017 ISBN ABC 12345678 DOI 987654321 © European Union, 2017 Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. Flash Report 01/2017 Country Labour Law Experts Austria Martin Risak Daniela Kroemer Belgium Wilfried Rauws Bulgaria Krassimira Sredkova Croatia Ivana Grgurev Cyprus Nicos Trimikliniotis Czech Republic Nataša Randlová Denmark Natalie Videbaek Munkholm Estonia Gaabriel Tavits Finland Matleena Engblom France Francis Kessler Germany Bernd Waas Greece Costas Papadimitriou Hungary Gyorgy Kiss Ireland Anthony Kerr Italy Edoardo Ales Latvia Kristine Dupate Lithuania Tomas Davulis Luxemburg Jean-Luc Putz Malta Lorna Mifsud Cachia Netherlands Barend Barentsen Poland Leszek Mitrus Portugal José João Abrantes Rita Canas da Silva Romania Raluca Dimitriu Slovakia Robert Schronk Slovenia Polonca Končar Spain Joaquín García-Murcia Iván Antonio Rodríguez Cardo Sweden Andreas Inghammar United Kingdom Catherine Barnard Iceland Inga Björg Hjaltadóttir Liechtenstein Wolfgang Portmann Norway Helga Aune Lill Egeland Flash Report 01/2017 Table of Contents Executive Summary ..............................................
  • Nové Rekreační Drogy

    Nové Rekreační Drogy

    Neurotoxikologie nových „legálních rekreačních drog“ ze skupin empatogenů/entaktogenů a disociativ MUDr. S. Zakharov, CSc. Toxikologické informa ční st ředisko1 Klinika pracovního léka řství Nové rekrea ční drogy („Legal Highs“) - pojem • Nové syntetické psychoaktivní látky neuvedené v Jednotné Úmluv ě o omamných látkách, v zákonu č. 167/1998 Sb.; • Prodávají se legáln ě přes internet („smartshops“, „rostliny- zahrada-online“, „výzkumné chemikálie“, e-inzeráty, aj.) • „Je to jako hra na chemickou ruskou ruletu, protože nejsou údaje o toxicit ě, biometabolitech, fakrmakokinetice…“ (John W. Huffman) • „Clubbers‘ drugs“ – používají ~40% návštěvníků no čních klub ů •Účinky: stimulanty, empatogeny/entaktogeny, halucinogeny (psychedelika, delirianty, disociativa), sedativa, a kombinace… 2 Nové rekrea ční drogy • Výroba v Jihovýchodní Asii, Číně, balení a distribuce v Evropě a Spojených Státech. • Jednoduchá schémata syntézy (2-3 chemické reakce, běžné reagens (toluen, aceton...), vysoká stupe ň chemické čistoty (99%), nízké ceny; • Chemická struktura je podobná struktuře zakázaných (kontrolovaných) psychoaktivních látek; • „Výzkumné chemikálie“ seznam.cz –– 51 odkaz; google.cz – 82 700 odkaz ů; • www.bulkresearchchemicals.com; http://vip- 3 legals.com; www.buyanychem.com MDMA („Extáze“, éčko, koláč) – 3,4- MetylenDioxy-N-Metyl Amfetamin) • Syntezována v r. 1912 (A.Kollisch, Merck), rekrea ční použití od r. 1963, zákaz - 1985 (SZO, USA). • „Droga lásky“: empatogen ( R. Metzner, 1983) nebo entaktogen ( D. Nichols, 1986) - indukce pocit ů empatie, vcítění, soudružnosti, lásky, emoční blízkosti. • MDMA-asistovaná psychoterapie v léčbě posttraumatických stresových poruch (PTSD), (výzkum sponzorován MAPS USA (Multidisciplinary Association For Psychedelic Studies). • V ČR „malé množství“ – do 4 tbl. (400 mg). 4 Mechanismus účinku a toxicita MDMA • Efektivně uvol ňuje a inhibuje zpětné vychytávání SER (afinita k presynaptic- kému SERT), méně – DAT, NAT • Mírně nespecificky inhibuje MAO (A, B) • Mírný agonista 5-HT2-Re (změna percepce), DA2- Re (euforia), NA-Re (symp-mim.
  • Yerevan State Medical University After M. Heratsi

    Yerevan State Medical University After M. Heratsi

    YEREVAN STATE MEDICAL UNIVERSITY AFTER M. HERATSI DEPARTMENT OF PHARMACY Balasanyan M.G. Zhamharyan A.G. Afrikyan Sh. G. Khachaturyan M.S. Manjikyan A.P. MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY HANDOUT for the 3-rd-year pharmacy students (part 2) YEREVAN 2017 Analgesic Agents Agents that decrease pain are referred to as analgesics or as analgesics. Pain relieving agents are also called antinociceptives. An analgesic may be defined as a drug bringing about insensibility to pain without loss of consciousness. Pain has been classified into the following types: physiological, inflammatory, and neuropathic. Clearly, these all require different approaches to pain management. The three major classes of drugs used to manage pain are opioids, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents, and non opioids with the central analgetic activity. Narcotic analgetics The prototype of opioids is Morphine. Morphine is obtained from opium, which is the partly dried latex from incised unripe capsules of Papaver somniferum. The opium contains a complex mixture of over 20 alkaloids. Two basic types of structures are recognized among the opium alkaloids, the phenanthrene (morphine) type and the benzylisoquinoline (papaverine) type (see structures), of which morphine, codeine, noscapine (narcotine), and papaverine are therapeutically the most important. The principle alkaloid in the mixture, and the one responsible for analgesic activity, is morphine. Morphine is an extremely complex molecule. In view of establish the structure a complicated molecule was to degrade the: compound into simpler molecules that were already known and could be identified. For example, the degradation of morphine with strong base produced methylamine, which established that there was an N-CH3 fragment in the molecule.
  • Section 7: Criminal Offense, Criminal Responsibility, and Commission of a Criminal Offense

    Section 7: Criminal Offense, Criminal Responsibility, and Commission of a Criminal Offense

    63 Section 7: Criminal Offense, Criminal Responsibility, and Commission of a Criminal Offense Article 15: Criminal Offense A criminal offense is an unlawful act: (a) that is prescribed as a criminal offense by law; (b) whose characteristics are specified by law; and (c) for which a penalty is prescribed by law. Commentary This provision reiterates some of the aspects of the principle of legality and others relating to the purposes and limits of criminal legislation. Reference should be made to Article 2 (“Purpose and Limits of Criminal Legislation”) and Article 3 (“Principle of Legality”) and their accompanying commentaries. Article 16: Criminal Responsibility A person who commits a criminal offense is criminally responsible if: (a) he or she commits a criminal offense, as defined under Article 15, with intention, recklessness, or negligence as defined in Article 18; IOP573A_ModelCodes_Part1.indd 63 6/25/07 10:13:18 AM 64 • General Part, Section (b) no lawful justification exists under Articles 20–22 of the MCC for the commission of the criminal offense; (c) there are no grounds excluding criminal responsibility for the commission of the criminal offense under Articles 2–26 of the MCC; and (d) there are no other statutorily defined grounds excluding criminal responsibility. Commentary When a person is found criminally responsible for the commission of a criminal offense, he or she can be convicted of this offense, and a penalty or penalties may be imposed upon him or her as provided for in the MCC. Article 16 lays down the elements required for a finding of criminal responsibility against a person.
  • Four Models of the Criminal Process Kent Roach

    Four Models of the Criminal Process Kent Roach

    Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology Volume 89 Article 5 Issue 2 Winter Winter 1999 Four Models of the Criminal Process Kent Roach Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/jclc Part of the Criminal Law Commons, Criminology Commons, and the Criminology and Criminal Justice Commons Recommended Citation Kent Roach, Four Models of the Criminal Process, 89 J. Crim. L. & Criminology 671 (1998-1999) This Criminology is brought to you for free and open access by Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology by an authorized editor of Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. 0091-4169/99/8902-0671 THM JOURNAL OF QMINAL LAW& CRIMINOLOGY Vol. 89, No. 2 Copyright 0 1999 by Northwestem University. School of Law Psisd in USA. CRIMINOLOGY FOUR MODELS OF THE CRIMINAL PROCESS KENT ROACH* I. INTRODUCTION Ever since Herbert Packer published "Two Models of the Criminal Process" in 1964, much thinking about criminal justice has been influenced by the construction of models. Models pro- vide a useful way to cope with the complexity of the criminal pro- cess. They allow details to be simplified and common themes and trends to be highlighted. "As in the physical and social sciences, [models present] a hypothetical but coherent scheme for testing the evidence" produced by decisions made by thousands of actors in the criminal process every day.2 Unlike the sciences, however, it is not possible or desirable to reduce the discretionary and hu- manistic systems of criminal justice to a single truth.
  • Nvcc College-Wide Course Content Summary Lgl 218 - Criminal Law (3 Cr.)

    Nvcc College-Wide Course Content Summary Lgl 218 - Criminal Law (3 Cr.)

    NVCC COLLEGE-WIDE COURSE CONTENT SUMMARY LGL 218 - CRIMINAL LAW (3 CR.) COURSE DESCRIPTION Focuses on major crimes, including their classification, elements of proof, intent, conspiracy, responsibility, parties, and defenses. Emphasizes Virginia law. May include general principles of applicable Constitutional law and criminal procedure. Lecture 3 hours per week. GENERAL COURSE PURPOSE This course is designed to introduce the student to the various substantive and procedural areas of criminal law. ENTRY LEVEL COMPETENCIES Although there are no prerequisites for this course, proficiency (at the high school level) in spoken and written English is recommended for its successful completion. COURSE OBJECTIVES Upon completion of this course, the student should be able to: - describe the structure of the criminal justice system - describe the elements of various federal and Virginia state crimes - understand the ways in which a person can become a party to a crime - describe the elements of various affirmative defenses to federal and Virginia state crimes - understand the basic structure of the law governing arrest, search and seizure, and recognize Constitutional issues posed in these areas - describe the stages of criminal proceedings, in both federal and state courts, and assist a prosecutor or defense lawyer at each stage of such proceedings MAJOR TOPICS TO BE INCLUDED - crimes versus moral wrongs - felonies vs. misdemeanors - criminal capacity - actus reas, mens rea and causation - elements of various federal and Virginia state crimes - inchoate crimes: attempt, solicitation, and conspiracy - parties to a crime - affirmative defenses - insanity - probable cause - arrest, with and without a warrant - search and seizure, with and without a warrant - grand jury indictments - bail and pretrial release - pretrial proceedings - steps of trial and appeal EXTRA TOPICS WHICH MAY BE INCLUDED - purposes of criminal law and punishment - sentencing, probation and parole - special issues posed by mental illness - special issues posed by the death penalty .
  • Dissertationes Medicinae Universitatis Tartuensis 106 Dissertationes Medicinae Universitatis Tartuensis 106

    Dissertationes Medicinae Universitatis Tartuensis 106 Dissertationes Medicinae Universitatis Tartuensis 106

    DISSERTATIONES MEDICINAE UNIVERSITATIS TARTUENSIS 106 DISSERTATIONES MEDICINAE UNIVERSITATIS TARTUENSIS 106 EPIDEMIOLOGY OF ADULT EPILEPSY IN TARTU, ESTONIA Incidence, prevalence and medical treatment ANDRE ÕUN TARTU UNIVERSITY PRESS Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia Dissertation is accepted for the commencement of the degree of Doctor of Medical Sciences on March 22, 2005 by the Council of the Faculty of Medicine, University of Tartu, Estonia Opponent: Dr. Tapani Keränen, University of Tampere, Finland Commencement: May 4, 2005 Publication of this dissertation is granted by the Faculty of Medicine, University of Tartu ISSN 1024–395X ISBN 9949–11–034–3 (trükis) ISBN 9949–11–035–1 (PDF)) Autoriõigus Andre Õun, 2005 Tartu Ülikooli Kirjastus www.tyk.ee Tellimus nr. 142 CONTENTS LIST OF ORIGINAL PUBLICATIONS......................................................... 8 ABBREVIATIONS......................................................................................... 9 I. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................... 10 II. REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE ............................................................ 12 1. General aspects and methodology ......................................................... 12 1.1. Diagnostic accuracy ....................................................................... 12 1.2. Criteria, clinical characteristics and classifications........................ 13 1.2.1. Criteria for the activeness of epilepsy ................................
  • )&F1y3x PHARMACEUTICAL APPENDIX to THE

    )&F1y3x PHARMACEUTICAL APPENDIX to THE

    )&f1y3X PHARMACEUTICAL APPENDIX TO THE HARMONIZED TARIFF SCHEDULE )&f1y3X PHARMACEUTICAL APPENDIX TO THE TARIFF SCHEDULE 3 Table 1. This table enumerates products described by International Non-proprietary Names (INN) which shall be entered free of duty under general note 13 to the tariff schedule. The Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS) registry numbers also set forth in this table are included to assist in the identification of the products concerned. For purposes of the tariff schedule, any references to a product enumerated in this table includes such product by whatever name known. Product CAS No. Product CAS No. ABAMECTIN 65195-55-3 ACTODIGIN 36983-69-4 ABANOQUIL 90402-40-7 ADAFENOXATE 82168-26-1 ABCIXIMAB 143653-53-6 ADAMEXINE 54785-02-3 ABECARNIL 111841-85-1 ADAPALENE 106685-40-9 ABITESARTAN 137882-98-5 ADAPROLOL 101479-70-3 ABLUKAST 96566-25-5 ADATANSERIN 127266-56-2 ABUNIDAZOLE 91017-58-2 ADEFOVIR 106941-25-7 ACADESINE 2627-69-2 ADELMIDROL 1675-66-7 ACAMPROSATE 77337-76-9 ADEMETIONINE 17176-17-9 ACAPRAZINE 55485-20-6 ADENOSINE PHOSPHATE 61-19-8 ACARBOSE 56180-94-0 ADIBENDAN 100510-33-6 ACEBROCHOL 514-50-1 ADICILLIN 525-94-0 ACEBURIC ACID 26976-72-7 ADIMOLOL 78459-19-5 ACEBUTOLOL 37517-30-9 ADINAZOLAM 37115-32-5 ACECAINIDE 32795-44-1 ADIPHENINE 64-95-9 ACECARBROMAL 77-66-7 ADIPIODONE 606-17-7 ACECLIDINE 827-61-2 ADITEREN 56066-19-4 ACECLOFENAC 89796-99-6 ADITOPRIM 56066-63-8 ACEDAPSONE 77-46-3 ADOSOPINE 88124-26-9 ACEDIASULFONE SODIUM 127-60-6 ADOZELESIN 110314-48-2 ACEDOBEN 556-08-1 ADRAFINIL 63547-13-7 ACEFLURANOL 80595-73-9 ADRENALONE
  • NINDS Custom Collection II

    NINDS Custom Collection II

    ACACETIN ACEBUTOLOL HYDROCHLORIDE ACECLIDINE HYDROCHLORIDE ACEMETACIN ACETAMINOPHEN ACETAMINOSALOL ACETANILIDE ACETARSOL ACETAZOLAMIDE ACETOHYDROXAMIC ACID ACETRIAZOIC ACID ACETYL TYROSINE ETHYL ESTER ACETYLCARNITINE ACETYLCHOLINE ACETYLCYSTEINE ACETYLGLUCOSAMINE ACETYLGLUTAMIC ACID ACETYL-L-LEUCINE ACETYLPHENYLALANINE ACETYLSEROTONIN ACETYLTRYPTOPHAN ACEXAMIC ACID ACIVICIN ACLACINOMYCIN A1 ACONITINE ACRIFLAVINIUM HYDROCHLORIDE ACRISORCIN ACTINONIN ACYCLOVIR ADENOSINE PHOSPHATE ADENOSINE ADRENALINE BITARTRATE AESCULIN AJMALINE AKLAVINE HYDROCHLORIDE ALANYL-dl-LEUCINE ALANYL-dl-PHENYLALANINE ALAPROCLATE ALBENDAZOLE ALBUTEROL ALEXIDINE HYDROCHLORIDE ALLANTOIN ALLOPURINOL ALMOTRIPTAN ALOIN ALPRENOLOL ALTRETAMINE ALVERINE CITRATE AMANTADINE HYDROCHLORIDE AMBROXOL HYDROCHLORIDE AMCINONIDE AMIKACIN SULFATE AMILORIDE HYDROCHLORIDE 3-AMINOBENZAMIDE gamma-AMINOBUTYRIC ACID AMINOCAPROIC ACID N- (2-AMINOETHYL)-4-CHLOROBENZAMIDE (RO-16-6491) AMINOGLUTETHIMIDE AMINOHIPPURIC ACID AMINOHYDROXYBUTYRIC ACID AMINOLEVULINIC ACID HYDROCHLORIDE AMINOPHENAZONE 3-AMINOPROPANESULPHONIC ACID AMINOPYRIDINE 9-AMINO-1,2,3,4-TETRAHYDROACRIDINE HYDROCHLORIDE AMINOTHIAZOLE AMIODARONE HYDROCHLORIDE AMIPRILOSE AMITRIPTYLINE HYDROCHLORIDE AMLODIPINE BESYLATE AMODIAQUINE DIHYDROCHLORIDE AMOXEPINE AMOXICILLIN AMPICILLIN SODIUM AMPROLIUM AMRINONE AMYGDALIN ANABASAMINE HYDROCHLORIDE ANABASINE HYDROCHLORIDE ANCITABINE HYDROCHLORIDE ANDROSTERONE SODIUM SULFATE ANIRACETAM ANISINDIONE ANISODAMINE ANISOMYCIN ANTAZOLINE PHOSPHATE ANTHRALIN ANTIMYCIN A (A1 shown) ANTIPYRINE APHYLLIC
  • PHARMACEUTICAL APPENDIX to the TARIFF SCHEDULE 2 Table 1

    PHARMACEUTICAL APPENDIX to the TARIFF SCHEDULE 2 Table 1

    Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (2020) Revision 19 Annotated for Statistical Reporting Purposes PHARMACEUTICAL APPENDIX TO THE HARMONIZED TARIFF SCHEDULE Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (2020) Revision 19 Annotated for Statistical Reporting Purposes PHARMACEUTICAL APPENDIX TO THE TARIFF SCHEDULE 2 Table 1. This table enumerates products described by International Non-proprietary Names INN which shall be entered free of duty under general note 13 to the tariff schedule. The Chemical Abstracts Service CAS registry numbers also set forth in this table are included to assist in the identification of the products concerned. For purposes of the tariff schedule, any references to a product enumerated in this table includes such product by whatever name known.
  • 124.204 Schedule I — Substances Included. 1. Schedule I Shall Consist

    124.204 Schedule I — Substances Included. 1. Schedule I Shall Consist

    1 , §124.204 124.204 Schedule I — substances included. 1. Schedule I shall consist of the drugs and other substances, by whatever official name, common or usual name, chemical name, or brand name designated, listed in this section. 2. Opiates. Unless specifically excepted or unless listed in another schedule, any of the following opiates, including their isomers, esters, ethers, salts, and salts of isomers, esters, and ethers, whenever the existence of such isomers, esters, ethers, and salts is possible within the specific chemical designation: a. Acetylmethadol. b. Allylprodine. c. Alphacetylmethadol (except levo-alphacetylmethadol also known as levo-alpha- acetylmethadol, levomethadyl acetate, or LAAM). d. Alphameprodine. e. Alphamethadol. f. Alpha-Methylfentanyl (N-(1-(alpha-methyl-beta-phenyl) ethyl-4-piperidyl) propionanilide; 1-(1-methyl-2-phenylethyl)-4-(N-propanilido)piperidine). g. Benzethidine. h. Betacetylmethadol. i. Betameprodine. j. Betamethadol. k. Betaprodine. l. Clonitazene. m. Dextromoramide. n. Difenoxin. o. Diampromide. p. Diethylthiambutene. q. Dimenoxadol. r. Dimepheptanol. s. Dimethylthiambutene. t. Dioxaphetyl butyrate. u. Dipipanone. v. Ethylmethylthiambutene. w. Etonitazene. x. Etoxeridine. y. Furethidine. z. Hydroxypethidine. aa. Ketobemidone. ab. Levomoramide. ac. Levophenacylmorphan. ad. Morpheridine. ae. Noracymethadol. af. Norlevorphanol. ag. Normethadone. ah. Norpipanone. ai. Phenadoxone. aj. Phenampromide. ak. Phenomorphan. al. Phenoperidine. am. Piritramide. an. Proheptazine. ao. Properidine. ap. Propiram. aq. Racemoramide. ar. Tilidine. as. Trimeperidine. at. Beta-hydroxy-3-methylfentanyl (other name: N-[1-(2-hydroxy-2-phenethyl)- 3-methyl-4-piperidinyl]-N-phenylpropanamide). Thu May 19 07:35:43 2016 Iowa Code 2016, Section 124.204 (25, 1) §124.204, 2 au. Acetyl-alpha-methylfentanyl (N-[1-(1-methyl-2-phenethyl)-4-piperidinyl]-N- phenylacetamide). av.