Report of RVIB Nathaniel B. Palmer Cruise NBP02-04 to the Western Antarctic Peninsula 31 July to 18 September 2002

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Report of RVIB Nathaniel B. Palmer Cruise NBP02-04 to the Western Antarctic Peninsula 31 July to 18 September 2002 Report of RVIB Nathaniel B. Palmer Cruise NBP02-04 to the Western Antarctic Peninsula 31 July to 18 September 2002 United States Southern Ocean Global Ocean Ecosystems Dynamics Program Report Number 8 Report of RVIB Nathaniel B. Palmer Cruise 02-04 to the Western Antarctic Peninsula 31 July to 18 September 2002 This report was prepared by Peter Wiebe, Eileen Hofmann, Bob Beardsley, Chris MacKay, Kendra Daly, Jose Torres, Scott Gallager, Christine Ribic, Erik Chapman, Ryan Dorland, Frank Stewart, Jenny Boc, Gareth Lawson, Yulia Serebrennikova, Gustavo Thompson, and Francisco “Chico” Viddi with assistance from colleagues in the scientific party, and of the Raytheon Support Services. Dicky Allison provided assistance in proofing the text. United States Southern Ocean Global Ocean Ecosystems Dynamics Program Report Number 8 Available from U.S. Southern Ocean GLOBEC Planning Office Center for Coastal Physical Oceanography Crittenton Hall Old Dominion University Norfolk, VA 23529 Sponsored by Office of Polar Programs, National Science Foundation 2 Acknowledgments This was the fourth and final broad-scale survey cruise to the Southern Ocean GLOBEC Study site on the Western Antarctic Peninsula. In spite of very formidable pack ice conditions in much of the area, the N.B. Palmer was able to take us to much of the area in which we wished to work and we were able to accomplish much of the science that we set out to do. This was due in part to the skill and expertise of Captain Joe and the officers in working in winter sea ice conditions. It was also due to the fine technical assistance we have received from all ten members of the Raytheon Marine Technical Support Group. The crew of the Palmer also played an important role in keeping the morale high. A special thanks to Ernest Skelly and his galley crew for their culinary expertise. The success of the cruise was due to the collective efforts of all of these individuals. Throughout the cruise there was a camaraderie and friendliness among all the participants that made this expedition a great pleasure. NBP02-04 Cruise Participants on the RVIB N.B. Palmer (see facing page) Kneeling Row1 (L-R): Dicky Allison, Scott Gallager, Nancy Ford, Phil Alatalo, Jamee Johnson, Jose Torres Crouching Row2 (L-R): Jenny Boc, Emily Yam, Alec Scott Row 3 (starting left of middle): Eileen Hofmann, Karie Sines, Susan Beardsley, Chris Ribic, Chris Shepherd, Todd Johnson, Tom Bailey (back), Ryan Dorland (front), Chris MacKay, Yulia Serebrennikova, Kendra Daly. Row 4: Peter Wiebe, Sarah Dizick, Gareth Lawson, Frank Stewart, Gustavo Thompson, Bob Beardsley, Melanie Parker, Chico Viddi, Erik Chapman, Baris Salihoglu, Kathleen Gavahan, Jason Zimmerman, Fred Stuart, Frank Welte, Partricia Jackson, Steve Bell, Joe Donnelly, Kerri Scolardi, Stian Alesandrini. Not shown: Paul Huckins 3 04 Cruise Participants - NBP02 4 5 TABLE OF CONTENTS PURPOSE OF THE CRUISE .............................................................................................................. 10 CRUISE NARRATIVE ....................................................................................................................... 14 INDIVIDUAL PROJECT REPORTS ................................................................................................... 44 1.0 Hydrography and Circulation ......................................................................................................... 44 1.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 44 1.2 Data Collection and Methods ............................................................................................. 45 1.2.1 CTD and Water Samples .................................................................................... 46 1.2.1.1 CTD Salinity Calibration ...................................................................... 47 1.2.1.2 Oxygen Calibration ............................................................................. 50 1.2.2 Expendable Probes ............................................................................................ 52 1.2.3 ADCP Measurements......................................................................................... 52 1.3 Preliminary Results........................................................................................................... 53 1.3.1 Water Masses ................................................................................................... 53 1.3.2 Water Mass and Circulation Distribution .............................................................. 55 1.4 Hydrography/Circulation Highlights from all SO GLOBEC Cruises ......................................... 58 1.5 Acknowledgments............................................................................................................ 58 2.0 Microstructure Measurements with CMiPS..................................................................................... 58 2.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 58 2.2 Instrumentation and Data Collection ................................................................................... 59 2.3 Data Processing............................................................................................................... 61 2.4 Instrumentation Problems ................................................................................................. 64 2.5 Preliminary Results........................................................................................................... 65 2.5.1 Anchor Station 1............................................................................................... 65 2.5.2 Anchor Station 2............................................................................................... 66 2.5.3 Anchor Station 3............................................................................................... 66 2.5.4 Anchor Station 4............................................................................................... 68 2.5.5 Anchor Stations 5 and 6..................................................................................... 69 2.5.6 Anchor Stations 7 and 8..................................................................................... 69 3.0 Meteorological Measurements........................................................................................................ 70 3.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 70 3.2 Instrumentation................................................................................................................ 70 3.3 Data Acquisition and Processing ........................................................................................ 72 3.4 Description of Cruise Weather ........................................................................................... 72 3.5 Description of Surface Fluxes ........................................................................................... 72 4.0 Nutrients..................................................................................................................................... 74 4.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 74 4.2 Methods.......................................................................................................................... 74 4.3 Data ............................................................................................................................... 75 4.4 Preliminary Results for Nutrient Concentrations................................................................... 75 4.5 References ...................................................................................................................... 77 5.0 Primary Production ...................................................................................................................... 77 5.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 77 5.2 Methods.......................................................................................................................... 77 5.2.1 Sampling Locations ........................................................................................... 77 5.2.2 Depths ............................................................................................................. 78 5.2.3 Equipment ........................................................................................................ 78 6 5.3 Data Collected ................................................................................................................. 78 5.4 Preliminary Results.......................................................................................................... 78 6.0 Zooplankton Studies ..................................................................................................................... 82 6.1 Zooplankton Sampling with the 1-m2 MOCNESS Net System ............................................... 82 6.1.1 Introduction...................................................................................................... 82 6.1.2 Methods and Approach...................................................................................... 82 6.1.3 Preliminary Findings
Recommended publications
  • Winter Habitat Use and Foraging Behavior of Crabeater Seals Along the Western Antarctic Peninsula
    ARTICLE IN PRESS Deep-Sea Research II 51 (2004) 2279–2303 www.elsevier.com/locate/dsr2 Winter habitat use and foraging behavior of crabeater seals along the Western Antarctic Peninsula Jennifer M. Burnsa,Ã, Daniel P. Costab, Michael A. Fedakc, Mark A. Hindelld, Corey J.A. Bradshawd, Nicholas J. Galese, Birgitte McDonaldf, Stephen J. Trumbleg, Daniel E. Crockerf aDepartment of Biological Science, University of Alaska, 3211 Providence Dr., Anchorage, AK 99508, USA bDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California Santa Cruz, 100 Shaffer Road, Santa Cruz, CA 95060, USA cGatty Marine Laboratory, Sea Mammal Research Unit, University of St. Andrews, Fife KY16 8LB, Scotland dAntarctic Wildlife Research Unit, School of Zoology, University of Tasmania, GPO Box 252-05, Hobart, Tasmania 7001, Australia eAustralian Antarctic Division, Channel Highway, Kingston Tasmania 7050, Australia fDepartment of Biology, Sonoma State University, 1801 East Cotati Avenue, Rohnert Park, CA 94928, USA gSchool of Fisheries and Ocean Sciences, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK 99775, USA Accepted 8 July 2004 Abstract We quantified the winter and spring movement patterns and foraging behavior of adult crabeater seals (Lobodon carcinophagus), and the influence of sea ice and bathymetry on their foraging behavior. Thirty-four seals (16 M 18 F) were outfitted with Satellite Relay Data Loggers (SRDLs) in the Marguerite Bay Region of the Antarctic Peninsula (671S, 671W) during the austral winters of 2001 and 2002. Tags transmitted position and dive information for between 4 and 174 days. Overall, winter activity patterns differed significantly from previously reported data collected during the summer: seals in this study dived deeper (9270.2 m, range 6–713 m) and longer (5.26 min70.6, range 0.2–23.6 min), hauled out during the night rather than the day, and showed seasonal shifts in foraging patterns consistent with foraging on vertically migrating prey.
    [Show full text]
  • Report of R/V Laurence M. Gould Cruise LMG03-02 to the Western Antarctic Peninsula 12 February to 7 March 2003
    Report of R/V Laurence M. Gould Cruise LMG03-02 to the Western Antarctic Peninsula 12 February to 7 March 2003 United States Southern Ocean Global Ocean Ecosystems Dynamics Program Report Number 9 Report of R/V Laurence M. Gould Cruise LMG03-02 to the Western Antarctic Peninsula 12 February to 7 March 2003 This cruise report was prepared by Bob Beardsley, Richard Limeburner, Jason Hyatt, Irene Beardsley, John Hildebrand, Mark MaDonald, Sean Wiggins, Sue Moore, Deb Thiele, and Deb Glasgow. United States Southern Ocean Global Ocean Ecosystems Dynamics Program Report Number 9 Available from U.S. Southern Ocean GLOBEC Planning Office Center for Coastal Physical Oceanography Crittenton Hall Old Dominion University Norfolk, VA 23529 Sponsored by Office of Polar Programs, National Science Foundation 2 Acknowledgments We especially want to thank Captain Robert Verret II and the officers and crew of the R/V Laurence M. Gould for their superb assistance in the recovery and deployment of the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (WHOI) and Scripps Institution of Oceanography (SIO) moorings during LMG03-02, and in the marine mammal survey work. Some of the mooring recoveries occurred in high wind and swell conditions, but the skill of the Captain and mates to maneuver the ship to make the stern deck a safe and efficient working area helped make these operations safe and quick. Special thanks to Skip Owen of Raytheon Polar Services (RPS) for coordinating the various activities during the cruise and, in general, making the cruise run smoothly. The WHOI mooring team was lead by Scott Worrilow with assistance from Brian Hogue, Dick Limeburner, Jason Hyatt, and Zan Stine.
    [Show full text]
  • Report of R/V Laurence M. Gould Cruise LMG02-03 to the Western Antarctic Peninsula 7 April to 21 May 2002
    Report of R/V Laurence M. Gould Cruise LMG02-03 to the Western Antarctic Peninsula 7 April to 21 May 2002 United States Southern Ocean Global Ocean Ecosystems Dynamics Program Report Number 5 Report of R/V Laurence M. Gould Cruise LMG02-03 to the Western Antarctic Peninsula 7 April to 21 May 2002 Report was prepared by J. Torres, J. Burns, C. Denker, K. Daly, S.-J. Ju, A. Friedlaender, M. Zhou, J. Morin, with considerable assistance from our colleagues in the science party, our Raytheon Polar Services crew, and the Captain and crew of the R/V Laurence M. Gould. United States Southern Ocean Global Ocean Ecosystems Dynamics Program Report Number 5 Available from U.S. Southern Ocean GLOBEC Planning Office Center for Coastal Physical Oceanography Crittenton Hall Old Dominion University Norfolk, VA 23529 Sponsored by Office of Polar Programs, National Science Foundation 2 Acknowledgments A grateful scientific party would like to extend their sincere thanks to our friends on the Laurence M. Gould for making our cruise a successful one. To Steve Ager, Christian McDonald, and Josh Spillane for help on deck, in the Zodiacs, under the ocean, in the shop, with logistics and damn near everything else. To Fred Stuart and Andy Nunn for keeping our MOCNESS nets running, emails flowing, DAS system recording, and CTDs dunking. To Mo Hodgins for keeping our chems straight, our chlorophyll green, and our hazmats out of doors. To Jeff Morin for CTD deployments and nutrient analyses beyond the call of duty, particularly on the ammonia front. To Captain Robert Verret, chief mate Jesse Gans, 2nd mate Jay Bouzigard, and 3rd mate Alan Arrigoni for plain and fancy boat driving, pinnacle avoidance, putting up with our schedule changes, and generally keeping us all safe.
    [Show full text]
  • Wildlife Awareness Manual
    WILDLIFE AWARENESS MANUAL ANTARCTIC PENINSULA SOUTH SHETLAND ISLANDS SOUTH ORKNEY ISLANDS Second Edition EFFECTIVE 31 MAY 2021 WAIVER Whilst every care has been taken to ensure the accuracy of this publication, it has not been possible to undertake a comprehensive check of the accuracy or completeness of data compiled from external sources. Maps and images contained in this publication are not intended for navigation or to locate precisely any particular feature. None of those involved in producing this publication can accept liability for injury, loss or damage arising in any respect of any part of this publication. Wildlife Awareness Manual: Antarctic Peninsula, South Shetland Islands, South Orkney Islands © 2021 Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office (United Kingdom), Environmental Research & Assessment Ltd., German Federal Ministry for the Environment, and the International Association of Antarctica Tour Operators. All rights reserved. First published in the United Kingdom in 2006 by Environmental Research & Assessment (ERA), Cambridge. Second Edition published in the United Kingdom in 2021 by Environmental Research & Assessment (ERA), Cambridge. The rights of Colin Harris to be identified as author of this work have been asserted under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, without either the prior written permission of the publisher and copyright owner(s) or a licence permitting restricted copying in the United Kingdom issued by the Copyright Licencing Agency Limited, Shackleton House, 4 Battle Bridge Lane, London SE1 2HX. ISBN 978-0-9575208-4-4 British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication data A CIP catalogue record for this publication is available from the British Library.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report of the Thirtieth Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting
    Final Report of the Thirtieth Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting ANTARCTIC TREATY CONSULTATIVE MEETING Final Report of the Thirtieth Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting New Delhi, India 30 April – 11 May 2007 Secretariat of the Antarctic Treaty Buenos Aires 2007 Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting (30th : 2007 : New Delhi) Final Report of the Thirtieth Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting. New Delhi, India, 30 April - 11 May 2007. Buenos Aires : Secretariat of the Antarctic Treaty, 2007. 462p. ISBN 978-987-23163-2-7 1. International law – Environmental issues. 2. Antarctic Treaty system. 3. Environmental law – Antarctica. 4. Environmental protection – Antarctica. DDC 341.762 5 ISBN 978-987-23163-2-7 CONTENTS Acronyms and Abbreviations 9 I. FINAL REPORT 11 II. MEASURES, DECISIONS AND RESOLUTIONS 53 A. Measures 55 Measure 1 (2007): Antarctic Specially Protected Areas: Revised Management Plans 57 Annex A: ASPA No 109 - Moe Island, South Orkney Islands 59 Annex B: ASPA No 129 - Rothera Point, Adelaide Island 67 Measure 2 (2007): Antarctic Specially Managed Areas: Designations and Management Plans 75 Annex A: ASMA No 5 - Amundsen-Scott South Pole Station, South Pole 77 Annex B: ASMA No 6 - Larsemann Hills, East Antarctica 99 Measure 3 (2007): Antarctic Historic Sites and Monuments: Monument to the Antarctic Treaty 131 B. Decisions 133 Decision 1 (2007): Review of the Status of Measures Relating to Area Protection and Management 135 Annex: List of Measures 137 Decision 2 (2007): Re-appointment of the Executive Secretary 139 Annex: Letters of the Chair of the 30th ATCM to Mr Jan Huber and Mr Jorge Taiana 141 Decision 3 (2007): Appointment of an External Auditor 145 Annex: Tasks to be carried by the External Auditor 147 Decision 4 (2007): Approval of the Secretariat´s Programme and Budget for 2007/8 149 Annex A: Financial Report for 2006/2007 151 Annex B: Work Programme and Budget for 2007/2008 157 C.
    [Show full text]
  • Gazetteer of the Antarctic
    NOIJ.VQNn OJ3ON3133^1 VNOI±VN r o CO ] ] Q) 1 £Q> : 0) >J N , CO O The National Science Foundation has TDD (Telephonic Device for the Deaf) capability, which enables individuals with hearing impairment to communicate with the Division of Personnel and Management about NSF programs, employment, or general information. This number is (202) 357-7492. GAZETTEER OF THE ANTARCTIC Fourth Edition names approved by the UNITED STATES BOARD ON GEOGRAPHIC NAMES a cooperative project of the DEFENSE MAPPING AGENCY Hydrographic/Topographic Center Washington, D. C. 20315 UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY National Mapping Division Reston, Virginia 22092 NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION Division of Polar Programs Washington, D. C. 20550 1989 STOCK NO. GAZGNANTARCS UNITED STATES BOARD ON GEOGRAPHIC NAMES Rupert B. Southard, Chairman Ralph E. Ehrenberg, Vice Chairman Richard R. Randall, Executive Secretary Department of Agriculture .................................................... Sterling J. Wilcox, member Donald D. Loff, deputy Anne Griesemer, deputy Department of Commerce .................................................... Charles E. Harrington, member Richard L. Forstall, deputy Henry Tom, deputy Edward L. Gates, Jr., deputy Department of Defense ....................................................... Thomas K. Coghlan, member Carl Nelius, deputy Lois Winneberger, deputy Department of the Interior .................................................... Rupert B. Southard, member Tracy A. Fortmann, deputy David E. Meier, deputy Joel L. Morrison, deputy Department
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Monitoring, Conservation, and Management
    A N T A R C T I C S I T E I N V E N T O R Y : 1 9 9 4 — 2 0 0 5 Lessons for Environmental Monitoring, Conservation, and Management Ron Naveen Oceanites, Inc. The Antarctic Site Inventory project has collected baseline biological data and GEOGRAPHICAL COVERAGE site-specific descriptive information in the Antarctic Peninsula since November 1994. The Inventory divides the Antarctic Peninsula into six subareas: The goal is to build a comprehensive database to assist implementation of the 1991 Protocol On Environmental Protection to the Antarctic Treaty. Elephant Island and nearby islands (EI); This poster examines key results and findings from eleven seasons inventorying the South Orkney Islands, including Laurie, Coronation, and Signy Islands (SO); Antarctic Peninsula, and how these results and findings potentially assist environmental monitoring, conservation, and management efforts Northeast Antarctic Peninsula/northwestern Weddell Sea (NE), by Antarctic Treaty Parties. from Cape Dubouzet (63˚16’S 64˚00’W) to James Ross Island; South Shetland Islands, including Deception, Low, and Smith Islands (SH); PLAN OF WORK, LOGISTICS The Inventory initially investigated whether opportunistic, well-timed, census visits by Northwest Antarctic Peninsula (NW), trained researchers, utilizing expedition ships, are an effective means for characterizing sites from Cape Dubouzet (63˚16’S 64˚00’W) to the northern end of Lemaire Channel; and and collecting essential baseline biological data and descriptive information. Southwest Antarctic Peninsula (SW), In eleven seasons from November 1994 through February 2005, the Inventory has from the northern end of the Lemaire Channel to the demonstrated clearly the utility and cost-effectiveness of such visits.
    [Show full text]
  • Chart Production in Antarctica
    1 1 Page intentionally left blank 2 LIMITS OF CHART INDEXES 3 LAZAREV SEA TO COOPERATION SEA (20°W – 90°E) A 4 Index A LAZAREV SEA TO COOPERATION SEA (20°W – 90°E) National No. Title Scale Latest Edition AUSTRALIA (AU) AUS 402 Casey bay to cape Darnley 1:1 000 000 1965 AUS 449 Magnet bay to cape Rouse 1:500 000 1993 (INT 9035) AUS 450 Cape Rouse to Sandefjord bay 1:500 000 1991 (INT 9035) AUS 451 Sandefjord bay to cape Rundingen 1:500 000 1992 (INT 9030) AUS 452 Cape Rundingen to Cape Filchner 1:500 000 2002 (INT 9031) AUS 600 Approaches to Mawson 1:25 000 2007 (INT 9036) Plan: Horseshoe harbour 1:5 000 AUS 602 Approaches to Davis anchorage 1:12 500 2003 (INT 9032) GERMANY (DE) 1701 Atka Iceport to Trolltunga 1:500 000 2009 (INT 9055) 1702 Approaches to Atka Iceport 1:300 000 2009 (INT 9057) JAPAN (JP) 3905 Lars Christensen coast to Prince Harald coast 1:3 000 000 1966 3911 Amundsen bay to Lützow-Holm bukta 1:800 000 1968 W3922 Vestvika Bay 1:500 000 2011 (INT 9045) W3941 Ongul islands to Skarvsnes 1:100 000 2010 (INT 9046) W3950 Ongul to Langhovde –Kita Misaki 1:25 000 2009 (INT 9047) Plan: Showa Kichi and Approaches 1:10 000 RUSSIAN FEDERATION (RU) 30132 Bouvet island to more Lazareva 1:2 000 000 1984 31150 Muskegbukta bay to Atka gulf 1:500 000 1986 31151 Erskine bay to Leningradbukta 1:500 000 1984 31152 Sergei Kamenev gulf to Neupokojevabukta 1:500 000 1999 (INT 9050) 32934 Approaches to Leningradbukta 1:200 000 1999 (INT 9051) 40122 Riiser-Larsen sea and more Kosmonavtov 1:2 000 000 1984 40123 Sodruzhestva Sea 1:2 000 000 2001 (INT
    [Show full text]
  • COMPOSITE GAZETTEER of ANTARCTICA (CGA) Draft Of
    Draft July 2002 Letter “A” only COMPOSITE GAZETTEER OF ANTARCTICA (CGA) Draft of Volume 2, letter A only Shanghai, July 2002 1 . 2 INTRODUCTION From 1998 to 2000 At the meeting of the WG on Geodesy and Geographic Information held in Concepción, Chile, July 1998, the first edition of the SCAR Composite Gazetteer of Antarctica (CGA) was presented and discussed. As a consequence of the discussion, the WG decided the upgrading of the CGA in order to include in future editions the dates of approval of names and the descriptions of the geographical features. All Member Countries were asked to send their contributions to the Italian team charged with the new task. An additional requirement, mainly addressed to those Countries that had already got the required supplementary information in their Gazetteers, was that the descriptions should be shortened in order to not exceed, on the average, 300 characters. The request was issued on 15 June 1999. At the meeting of the WG Program Leaders held in Heppenheim, Germany, July 1999, the difficulties of assembling a large amount of data in a comparatively short time appeared quite evident. It was decided, accordingly, that only the geographical names beginning with the letter "A" should be taken into consideration at the present stage. During the two year span between Concepción meeting (1998) and Tokyo meeting (2000) the work on the CGA went on along two lines: on the one side, dates of approval and descriptions were added to existing names; on the other side, new names were collected and included in the CGA, those new names coming most often complete with dates and descriptions.
    [Show full text]