DOCSLIB.ORG

Cambridge University Press 978-1-108-48323-0 — the Cross and the Eucharist in Early Christianity Daniel Cardó Index More Information

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Cambridge University Press 978-1-108-48323-0 — the Cross and the Eucharist in Early Christianity Daniel Cardó Index More Information Cambridge University Press 978-1-108-48323-0 — The Cross and the Eucharist in Early Christianity Daniel Cardó Index More Information Index Abel, 87, 91, 109 Cross and, 146–148; sphragis and, Abraham, 91, 109 103n278; uncertain authorship of, Adam, 83–84 108n307 Addai and Mari, liturgy of, 102n275, Ancient Antiochene Liturgy, 61n185 102n276, 148, Andrieu, Michel, 116, 132; Ordo III and, ad orientem (towards the east), 154. See also 118n352 orientation Angels, 43–44 Aldhelm, Bishop of Sherborne, 60n183 Angelus prayer, 75 Alexamenos graffito, 151 Annunciation, 75–76 almond rod, symbolism of, 25 anthropocentric error, 4 altar Cross, 2, 3, 6–7; consecration and, 86; Aphraates, 21; Demonstrations, 21 Eastern sources and, 61–65; fruits of the Apostolic Tradition, 7–8; Hippolytus and, cross and, 30; gesture of the Cross and, 43n111; sign of the Cross and, 146–148 53; historical sources for, 149–153; Armenian Lectionary, 126 horizontal and vertical dimensions of, Atchley, E. G. Cuthbert F., 132 155n91; presence of, 12; Ratzinger and, Athanasius, 39 6–7; sacramental theology and, 153–157; atonement, offering of, 90–92 sacrament of, 44; sacrifice and, 45–46, 49, Augustine: altar Cross and, 155; continuity 130; sign of the Cross and, 121–123; of tradition and, 17–19; Eucharistic unity tomb symbolism of, 34; Western sources and, 139; The Harmony of the Gospels, and, 58–61 36; identity of Christ’s flesh and, 36–37; Ambrose: Ambrosiaster and, 35; De Moses’ doubts and, 28; sacramental Sacramentis, 15–18, 105; Eucharistic theology and, 26–27; sacramentaries and, unity and, 139; identity of Christ’s Flesh 69; sacrifice and, 44–45; sign of the Cross and, 35; on John 19:34, 25–26; relics and, and, 55, 143; Tree of Life and, 25 59n179; sacrifice and, 43–44; sign of the Cross and, 54–55; On Virgins, 26; water Baldovin, John F., 4, 155n91; centrality of and, 143 the Cross and, 6; versus populum and, Ambrosiaster, 35 138 anamnesis (memorial), 49–50; epiclesis and, Baptism: fruit of the Cross and, 29; gesture 148; offering of gifts and, 112 and, 97–98; oil and, 82, 84–85; piercing anaphora: altar Cross and, 63 Roman of Christ’s side and, 32–33; sign of the Canon and, 105, 106, 109; sign of the Cross and, 54, 123–124, 143; sphragis 185 © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-1-108-48323-0 — The Cross and the Eucharist in Early Christianity Daniel Cardó Index More Information 186 Index and, 99–100, 101–103, 144; Tree of the call to live and, 58; continuity of tradition Cross and, 29; undoing of, 49; water and, and, 63n193; Eucharistic unity and, 139; 143 Eucharistic unity and, 139, 141; Basilica of the Holy Cross, 126, 127 Eucharist’s origin and, 31–32; sacrifice Basil of Caesarea, 7–8 and, 49–50; witness to tradition of, Baumstark, Anton, 77, 125n400 62n191 Bede, 30, 60–61 collects, 78–80; Exaltation of the Holy Beloved Disciple, 125n400 Cross, 80; Good Friday and, 78–80 Benedict XVI. See Ratzinger, Joseph commingling, rite of, 103n279 Bishop, Edmund, 106; epiclesis and, 147n52 Congregation for Divine Worship, 152 blessing, 121–125. See also Cross, gesture of Congregation of Rites, 152 the Consilium, 145–146 Blood of Christ: Augustine on, 18–19; Constantine, 64, 151 Byzantine rite of zeon and, 23n37; Constanza Carnelian, 151 Eastern sources on identification with, Corinthians, First Book of, 22 39–42; John 19:34 and, 25–26; mysteries Council of Trent, 4n12; offerre and, and, 93; piercing of Christ’s side and, 140–141 31–32; sacramental symbol of, 25; sign of creation, 77 the Cross and, 53, 56; Western sources Cross, 3; Ambrose and, 54–55; anamnesis and, 15–18; Western sources on and, 49–52; apostolic tradition and, 7–8; identification with, 35–39; wood of the Augustine and, 17–19; baptism and, Cross and, 83 97–98; Blood of Christ and,15–18; Body of Christ: Augustine on, 18–19; central presence of, 2, 3; consecration of consecration of paten and, 98–99; Eastern paten and, 98–99; contemporary debate sources on identification with, 39–42; and, 133–134; Eastern sources of, 21–24, sacrifice and, 46–47; sacrifice of bread 31–34; Eastern sources on altar Cross and wine and, 47; sign of the Cross and, and, 61–65; Eastern sources on Christ’s 53; Western sources on identification Flesh and, 39–42; Eastern sources on with, 35–39 continuity and, 21–24; Eastern sources on Boniface, 120 Eucharist’s origin and, 31–34; Eastern Botte, Dom Bernard, 106, 146–147 sources on sacrifice in, 48–53; epiclesis Bouyer, Louis, 8, 107 and, 145–149; Eucharistic meal and, 12, Bradshaw, Paul, 135, 139 142; Exaltation of the Holy Cross and, Braun, Joseph, 152–153 96; golden age of, 8; Good Friday and, bread: altar Cross and, 61n185; Lord’s 125–129; Last Supper and, 19–20; lifting Prayer and, 24; sign of the Cross and, 56. of the eyes as, 114; manuscripts and, 73, See also Body of Christ 115, 116, 132, 150; methodology and, Byzantine Empire, 128; epiclesis in, 148. See 10–11, 13–15; mysteries and, 61; oil and, also Eastern sources 81; Ordines Romani and, 118–121, 130–132; patristic texts and, 13–15, Cabrol, Fernand, 68 65–66; versus populum and, 137; Caesarius of Arles, 28–29; Eucharistic unity presence of, 12; presence of an angel at, and, 139 43–44; primary textual sources and, 10; canon actionis, 105n289 Roman Canon and, 99, 114–115; Capitula Martini, 60n181 sacramentaries and, 9; significant period Cassian, John, 45 of theological development and, 8–9; Chauvet, Louis-Marie, 3n6 sphragis and, 99–103; theory of, 136; Chosroes, 64 visibility and, 154–155; water sanctified Chrism Mass. See oil by, 98; Western conceptions of Chrysostom, John, 21–23; altar Cross and, Eucharist’s origin and, 24–31; Western 61–63, 153; body of Christ and, 39–40; sources on altar Cross and, 58–61; © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-1-108-48323-0 — The Cross and the Eucharist in Early Christianity Daniel Cardó Index More Information Index 187 Western sources on Christ’s Flesh and, 21; preaching of, 54–55; sign of the Cross 35–39; Western sources on sacrifice in, and, 57; Syrian tradition of, 64 43–47. See also sacrifice Cuthbert, 60n183 Cross, adoration of the, 128 Cyprian, 113 Cross, banquets of the, 61, 136, 137, 142. Cyrillonas, 23–24 See also Cross, feasts of the; meal Cyril of Alexandria, 42; sacrifice and, 52–53 (eucharist as) Cyril of Jerusalem, 39–40, 49; Mystalogical Cross, Discovery of the (Inventio Crucis), Catecheses, 49; sign of the Cross and, 57 82–84, 88 Cross, feasts of the, 8, 80, 82–84, 88, 96; Damasus, 105 most important of, 125n399. See also David (King of Israel), 82; offering of Cross, banquets of the; meal (eucharist holocaust and, 90 as) Didache, 100 Cross, gesture of the, 8, 96–99, 149, dogma, 9 154–155; altar Cross and, 65–66; Duchesne, Louis, 70–71 Ambrose and, 54–55; Augustine and, 55; Eastern sources and, 56–58; Gregory and, Easter, 76–78 55–56; sphragis and, 99–103. See also Eastern sources: altar Cross and, 61–65; Cross, sign of the; sphragis (seal of the anamnesis and, 49–52; Christ’s Flesh and, Cross) 39–42; continuity of tradition and, Cross, object of the: communion and, 21–24; Eucharist’s origin and, 31–34; 129–130; contemporary debate and, Good Friday and, 126; Institution 133–134; Ordines Romani and, 118–121, Narrative and, 113; Liturgy of the Pre- 125–129 Sanctified and, 129; sacrifice and, 48–53; Cross, relics of the: altar Cross and, 58–60; sign of the Cross and, 53, 56–58, Good Friday and, 127; Holy Thursday 146–148; sphragis and, 102n274 and, 140; humility and, 128; Ordines effunditor (to shed), 16–17. See also Blood Romani and, 121–123; True Cross as, of Christ 126 Egeria, 84, 126 Cross, sign of the, 54–55; altar Cross and, Encyclopedia of Christianity, 100 61n185; Ambrose and, 54–55; call to live Ephrem of Syria, 48, 56; sign of the Cross and, 58; Eastern sources on, 56–58; and, 143 epiclesis and, 145–149; historical debate epiclesis, 12, 145–149 on, 142–144; Ordines Romani and, Epiphanius, 48 118–121; relics and, 121–123; Roman Eucharist, 3; anamnesis and, 49–52; Canon and, 115; sign of peace and, apostolic tradition and, 7–8; Augustine 123–124; sphragis and, 99–103. See also and, 17–19; Blood of Christ and, 15–18; Cross, gesture of the; sphragis; sphragis centrality of the Cross and, 6–7; Eastern (seal of the Cross) sources of, 21–24, 31–34; Eastern sources Cross, tree of the, 20; Altar and, 30; bread on altar Cross and, 61–65; Eastern and, 29; Eucharist’s origin and, 34; sources on Christ’s Flesh and, 39–42; parallels between old and new, 33; Syrian Eastern sources on continuity and, 21–24; tradition and, 64n197; Western patristic Eastern sources on Cross as origin of, texts and, 24–31 31–34; Eastern sources on sacrifice in, Cross, wood of the, 20; altar Cross and, 48–53; golden age of, 8; Last Supper and, 63–64; oil and, 81–85. See also Cross, 19–20; meal character of, 5–6; relics of the; Cross, tree of the methodology and, 10–11, 13–15; patristic Cross-bearers (cruces portantes), texts and, 13–15; place of the cross in 124n398 celebration of, 2, 3; sacramentaries and, crucifix: depictions of, 150, 151–152; 9; significant period of theological mystery and, 25; Passover compared to, development and, 8–9; sign of the Cross © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-1-108-48323-0 — The Cross and the Eucharist in Early Christianity Daniel Cardó Index More Information 188 Index and, 54–55; traditions of the Cross and, Golden Mass (John the Evangelist), 65–66; Western conceptions of 122n382 Eucharist’s origin and, 24–31; Western Good Friday, 84, 125–126, 128; collects on, sources on altar Cross and, 58–61; 78–80; communion and, 129–130; Western sources on Christ’s Flesh and, Jerusalem and, 84; Ordines Romani and, 35–39; Western sources on sacrifice in, 125–129; Rome and, 125–129; unity of 43–47; wood of the Cross and, 20.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Epistles of St Paul
    NOTES ON EPISTLES OF ST PAUL FROM UNPUBLISHED COMMENT ARIES. ~ • • • NOTES ON EPISTLES OF ST PAUL FROM UNPUBLISHED COMMENTARIES BY THE LATE J. B. LIGHTFOOT, D.D., D.C.L., LL.D., LORD BISHOP OF DURHAM. PUBLISHED BY THE TRUSTEES OF THE LIGHTFOOT FUND. lLonbon: MACMILLAN AND CO. AND NEW YORK. 1895 [All Rights reserved.] i!tambribgc : PRINTED BY J. & C. F. CLAY, AT THE UNIVERSITY PRESS. INTRODUCTORY NOTE. HE present work represents the fulfilment of the under­ T taking announced in the preface to 'Biblical E~says' a year and a half ago. As that volume consisted of introduc­ tory essays upon New Testament subjects, so this comprises such of Dr Lightfoot's notes on the text as in the opinion of the Trustees of the Lightfoot Fund are sufficiently complete to justify publication. However, unlike 'Biblical Essays,' of which a considerable part had already been given to the world, this volume, as its title-page indicates, consists entirely of unpublished matter. It aims at reproducing, wherever possible, the courses of lectures delivered at Cambridge by Dr Lightfoot upon those Pauline Epistles which he did not live to edit in the form of complete commentaries. His method of trustiqg to his memory in framing sentences in the lecture room has been alluded to already in the preface to the previous volume. But here again the Editor's difficulty has been considerably lessened by the kindness of friends who were present at the lectures and have placed their note­ books at the disposal of the Trustees. As on the previous occasion, the thanks of the Trustees are especially due to W.
    [Show full text]
  • GRAS NOTICE 820, Lactobacillus Fermentum CECT5716
    GRAS Notice (GRN) No. 820 https://www.fda.gov/food/generally-recognized-safe-gras/gras-notice-inventory ~ b . ? •~::!~ ... BIOSEARCH •::• LIFE October 23, 2018 Office of Food Additive Safety (HFS-200) Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, Food and Drug Administration 5001 Campus Drive College Park - MD 20740 USA Dear Office of Food Additive Safety, Please accept these documents as submission for Generally Recognized as Safe (GRAS) evaluation of the probiotic, Lactobacillus fermentum CECT57 I 6, according to the Final Rule 21 CFR Parts 20, 25, 170, 184, 186 and 570. Do not hesitate to contact me for further clarification or to request additional i. Thank you for your time. BiOSEARCH, S .A C I F A - 18550111 Camino de Purchil, n° 66 18004 GRANADA OCT 2 6 2018 Laura Macho Valls Regulatory Affairs Manager OFFICE OF Biosearch Life. FOOD ADDITIVE SAFETY IIJOS~ARCH S.A. • Camino de Purcl'lil, 66 • 18004 GRANADA (Spain) • Tlfno: {+34) 958240152 • Fax: (+34) 958240160 • lnfo~ b1osearchlile.com • 28031 Madnd (Spa,n) • Tlrno: (•34) 913 802 973 • Fax: (•34) 913 802 279 • sales(a1biosearchlife.com inscr,ta en el Registro Mercantil de Granada. T. 914, F. 164, seccl6n 8, H GR-17202. Fecha 13-11-2000. • CIF es A-185S0111 blOSHl'Chllle.com GRAS ASSESSMENT Lactobacillus fermentum CECT5716 Version 1 ... •~::~~ BIOSEARCH 1 •••·- LIFE Madrid, 23 rd October 2018. OCT 2 6 2018 OFFICE OF FOOD ADDITIVE SAFETY I .-:~~~ BIOSEARCH •::• LIFE Content Part 1. Signed statements and certification ......................................................... 4 I. I GRAS notice accordi ng to 2 1 CFR § 170.225 ........... .. .. .... ..... .. ............ .. .. .................................... .. ..... ... ..... .. ... .. .4 1.2 ame and address of notifier.
    [Show full text]
  • February 11, 2018 Mingling of the Body and Blood of Christ!
    February 11, 2018 Mingling of the Body and Blood of Christ! Last Saturday, I received the following comment after the 5 pm Mass, "Father, I enjoyed reading your explanation of the mixing of the water and wine during the preparation of the gifts. I’ve noticed this hundreds of times but never understood it. I didn’t know that the priest was praying a silent prayer at that time. That prayer is quite inspirational. I now understand that the wine represents Jesus and the water represents us. This strengthens my understanding of our communion with Christ at Mass. I have also noticed that while we sing the Lamb of God, the priest, after breaking the host, places a small piece of the host into the Chalice. Can you explain why he does this?” My answer was simple, “At that very moment, the priest says another silent prayer: ‘May this mingling of the body and blood of our Lord Jesus Christ bring eternal life to us who receive it.’” This is a powerful moment at Mass. I’d like to share with you an explanation of it found in Edward Sri’s book, A Biblical Walk Through The Mass: Understanding what we say and do in the Liturgy. In chapter 23, Agnus Dei: The Fraction, Commingling and the "Lamb of God", Sri says, "The ritual known as the commingling was used at one time to express the unity of the Church. In Rome, the pope had a small particle of the consecrated host, called the fermentum (Latin for leaven), sent to priests in the city, who placed it in their chalices as a sign of their union with the Bishop of Rome.
    [Show full text]
  • ABSTRACT in the Early Nineteenth Century, the Church
    ABSTRACT In the early nineteenth century, the Church of England faced a crisis of self- understanding as a result of political and social changes occurring in Britain. The church was forced to determine what it meant to be the established church of the nation in light of these new circumstances. In the 1830s, a revival took place within the Church of England which prompted a renewal of the theology and practice of the church, including the Eucharist. This revival, known as the Oxford Movement, breathed new life into the High Church party. A heightened emphasis was placed on the sacramental life and on the Eucharist as the focus of worship. Adherents of the Oxford Movement developed a Eucharistic theology which promoted a closer connection between the elements and Christ’s presence in the Eucharist than did the earlier Anglican tradition. One of the exponents of this Eucharistic theology was Robert Isaac Wilberforce (1802- 1857). The second son of anti-slavery crusader William Wilberforce, Robert was raised in a family of prominent Anglican Evangelicals. At the University of Oxford he came under the influence of his tutor, John Keble, who was one of the four leaders of the Oxford Movement during its heyday. The Gorham case, whose focus was ostensibly the question of baptismal regeneration, turned into a debate on the state’s control over the established church. Robert 1 Wilberforce was called upon to articulate the sacramental theology of the Oxford Movement, which he did in his three major works, The Doctrine of Holy Baptism: With Remarks to the Rev.
    [Show full text]
  • The Eucharistic Ecclesiology of Nicolas Afanassieff: Prospects and Challenges for Contemporary Ecumenical Dialogue
    The Eucharistic Ecclesiology of Nicolas Afanassieff: Prospects and Challenges for Contemporary Ecumenical Dialogue By Richard R. Gaillardetz One of the most fruitful theological developments to emerge out of the Second Vatican Council is the exploration of the concept of communion as a foundation for contemporary eccesiology.1 Indeed, the concept of communion or koinonia, has become an increasingly central category within ecumenical dialogues.2 Many are unaware, however, of how much this ecclesiology of communion owes to an earlier ecclesiological trajectory, the eucharistic ecclesiology of Nicolas Afanassieff, a Russian Orthodox theologian who effected an ecclesiological renewal within Orthodoxy and indirectly influenced much of the renewal in Roman Catholic ecclesiology reflected in the documents of Vatican II. In this article we wish to reconsider the twentieth century origins of this eucharistic ecclesiology in the writings of Afanassieff and its contributions to contemporary ecclesiology and ecumenical relations between East and West. In the first part of this essay I will explore the origins and influences on Afanassieff's thought followed by a sketch of its defining features. This will be followed by a second section which will critically assess his eucharistic ecclesiology and explore its potential for both the renewal of ecclesiology in Roman Catholicism and the furthering of ecumenical dialogue between East and West. I. Nicolas Afanassieff and Eucharistic Ecclesiology A. Afanassieff's Theological Sources A proper understanding of Afanassieff's ecclesiology requires that we look first to the theological milieu in which he developed his thought. While the majority of his career before his death in 1966 was spent at the St.
    [Show full text]
  • Twelfth Annual Report Por Tee Year 1854
    THE TWELFTH ANNUAL REPORT POR TEE YEAR 1854, . REFEKRINGto the circumstances detailed in the last Annual Report, andcthe Resolution and explanations therein detailed, as to the completion of the prenent Series, in Deoember 1856, the Secretary has now the pleasure of stating, that, during the past year, every exertion has been macle to bring the operations of the - Society to a close in a satisfactory manner-so far as the interests of the Subscribers are concerned-within the period prescribed. The Books which have been prepared, in return for the Annual Subscriptions received for the year 1854, are the following :- I. COMMENTARIESox THE LAST FOUR BOOKSOF MOSES, AR- RANGED IN THE FORM OF A HAmimY, Vol. III., with Anno- tations, &c., by the Rev. Charles W. Bingham, M.A., Rector of Melcombe-Horsey, Dorset, and formerly Fellow of New College, Oxford. 11. COMMENTARIIlS ON THE BOOKOF THE PROPHET JEREMIAH, Vol. IV., with Annotations, &c., and a New Translation of the Text corresponding to the Contents. By the Bev.,John Owen, Vicar of Thrussington and Rural Dean, Leicester- shire. 111. COhiJIENTdRIES ON THE EPISTLES OF ST. PAUL TO THE GALATIANSAND EPHESIANS,with Anniitations ; and a New Translation of both of these Epistles, to which are appended Tables and a General Index. By the Rev. William Pringle. (Completed.) IV. COMMENTARIES UPON THE BOOK OF JOSHUA, with Tables and a General Index. By Henry Beveridge, Esq. : Professor TXOLUCK’SDISSERTATION on the value of Calvin as an Interpreter of Scripture : and OPINIONSand TEBTIXONIES respecting the Writings of John Calvin.-( Completed.) Thcse Volumes form the Twenty-third and Twenty-fourth Issues.
    [Show full text]
  • The History of Eucharistic Adoration Development of Doctrine in the Catholic Church by John A
    The History of Eucharistic Adoration Development of Doctrine in the Catholic Church by John A. Hardon, S.J. CONTENTS INTRODUCTION………………………………………………………………. 2 I. APOSTOLIC TIMES TO EARLY MIDDLE AGES………………………… 3 II. BERENGARIUS TO ST. FRANCIS OF ASSISI…………………………… 5 III. MIDDLE AGES TO THE COUNCIL OF TRENT………………………… 7 Before the Council of Trent…………………………………………… 7 The Council of Trent………………………………………………….. 7 IV. DEVELOPMENT OF EUCHARISTIC ADORATION…………………… 9 Forty-Hours Devotion………………………………………………… 9 Perpetual Adoration…………………………………………………… 9 Visits to the Blessed Sacrament………………………………………. 11 Benediction of the Blessed Sacrament……………………………….. 11 Eucharistic Congresses………………………………………………... 12 V. WHY DEVELOPMENT OF EUCHARISTIC DOCTRINE……………….. 13 Basic Premises of Doctrinal Development……………………………. 13 Experienced Benefits of Eucharistic Adoration………………………. 13 VI. THE CHURCH'S MAGISTERIUM……………………………………….. 15 Pope Pius XII…………………………………………………………. 16 Pope John XXIII………………………………………………………. 17 Pope Paul VI…………………………………………………………... 18 Pope John Paul II……………………………………………………… 20 VII. GRACE THROUGH THE HUMANITY OF CHRIST…………………… 21 1 INTRODUCTION The phenomenal growth of devotion to the Real Presence of Christ in the Holy Eucharist has puzzled not a few sincere people. Nocturnal Adoration societies, Perpetual Adoration groups, national associations of the faithful promoting organized visits to the Blessed Sacrament, Holy Hours before the tabernacle, monthly, weekly and even daily exposition of the Eucharist in churches and chapels, in one country after another, have become commonplace. What to make of all of this? Is this another form of pious eccentricity, or is it founded on authentic Catholic doctrine and grounded on the solid rock of Christian revelation? It is authentic Catholic doctrine and it rests on the unchangeable truth of our revealed faith. But it needs to be explained, and the explanation is a classic example of what we call development of doctrine.
    [Show full text]
  • Anglican Liturgics - WYP2118HF Fall Term, 2014 Dean Mercer - [email protected]
    Anglican Liturgics - WYP2118HF Fall Term, 2014 Dean Mercer - [email protected] The instructor can be reached by e-mail or by phone at 416-499-1545 and, if requested, will be available at the college for student visits before class, until 1:00 p.m. after class, or at a mutually convenient time. Class notes will be made available online. Course Objectives Having completed this course, the student: 1) will be introduced to the history and development of Christian liturgy and liturgy in the Anglican Church of Canada; 2) will be able to plan for Holy Communion and Morning Prayer according to the BCP and the BAS; 3) will be introduced to general principles of liturgical leadership. Course Requirements 1. Multiple Choice exam on the glossary (below). A good source for many of these terms is the revised edition of Liturgy for Living by Charles Price and Louis Weil (Morehouse, 2000). Also, Worship Without Words: The Signs and Symbols of our Faith, Patricia S. Klein (Paraclete Press, Brewster, Mass., 2000). 2. Liturgy Project Plan a Sunday liturgy of Holy Eucharist for February 15, 2015, March 1, 2015, or March 29, 2015, according to the Revised Common Lectionary and the modern rite in the Book of Alternative Services (page 185) with ceremonial notes and commentary (a model will be available online). The finished project will include three parts: a. The complete service and text. Indicate the options chosen, the variable prayers, hymns and tunes, anthems, sermon theme/outline, etc.. b. A rationale - why have you chosen each item to be part of your service.
    [Show full text]
  • Worship in Fifth-Century Rome: the Letter of Innocent I to Decentius of Gubbio (Cambridge: Grove Books Limited, 2002)
    Paul Turner: The Amen Corner 3-30-15 The Amen Corner: Between Consultation and Faithfulness: Questions That Won’t Go Away Paul Turner In the year 3615 AD, on the 1600th anniversary of the appearance of this article, perhaps English will be a dead language. Perhaps it will take specialized scholars to read these words in the original. Perhaps no print copy of this journal will have survived the moistures of time, and even electronic copies will have yielded to more durable forms of storage. Perhaps certain words in my vocabulary will be difficult to understand. Perhaps the religious and socio- political scene from which I write will be dimly grasped. It doesn’t take much humility to admit that anything I write would provoke scant interest 1600 years later. So I tip my cap to the early fifth-century bishop of the picturesque Umbrian see of Gubbio, a city that gave its name to the ancient Eugubine Tablets discovered there, and where Francis of Assisi legendarily tamed a menacing wolf. The bishop’s letter has been lost, but his name still bestrides the reply composed by the reigning pontiff. This coming March 19, a rare confluence of the Feast of St. Joseph and the Saturday of Palm Sunday weekend, will mark the 1600th anniversary of the Letter of Pope Innocent I to Decentius of Gubbio. To this day, the letter still influences liturgical practice and ecclesial authority. Robert Cabié translated and commented upon the critical edition he prepared: La Lettre du Pape Innocent Ier a Décentius de Gubbio (19 Mars 416), Bibliotèque de la Revue d’Histoire Ecclésiastique, Fascicule 58 (Louvain: Publications Universitaires de Louvain, 1973).
    [Show full text]
  • Liturgical Notes for Lent & Holy Week
    Liturgical Notes for Lent & Holy Week By The Rev. Matthew Hoxsie Mead The first day of Lent is Ash Wednesday. The Ash Wednesday liturgy features Readings from Scripture, the Litany of Penance, the Blessing and Ministration of Ashes, and the Holy Eucharist. Ironically, the Ashes are optional and simply an outward sign of what goes on at the service. That said, they are a traditional sign of penance, and also a sign that though we are mortal, we partake in Christ’s resurrection. Lent isn’t technically 40 days. To get to 40 you have to exclude Sundays. The number 40 mirrors the 40 days that Jesus spent in the wilderness, which in turn mirrors the 40 years the Israelites spent in the wilderness. The Church settled on 40 days of fasting and prayer, and excluded Sundays since they were and are Feasts of Our Lord and not fasts. The BCP 1979 notes that there are two major Fasts (with a capital F no less) in the year: Ash Wednesday and Good Friday. The rest of Lent is listed simply as “observed by special acts of discipline and self denial” – or in shorthand, fasts (with a little f). Purple or “Lenten Array” vestments are worn during Lent. We actually have sets of each type of vestments at Christ Church. Lenten Array sets feature off-white, almost oatmeal colored, vestments. In order to use as many of our sets as possible, we will wear purple in Lent in 2016, and we will use the Lenten Array set on Maundy Thursday (the traditional liturgical color for Maundy Thursday is white).
    [Show full text]
  • COMMENTARY on the EPISTLE to the GALATIANS by John Calvin
    THE AGES DIGITAL LIBRARY COMMENTARY COMMENTARY ON THE EPISTLE TO THE GALATIANS by John Calvin B o o k s F o r Th e A g e s AGES Software • Albany, OR USA Version 1.0 © 1998 TRANSLATOR’S PREFACE The extraordinary ability and skill displayed by CALVIN, in his COMMENTARIES on the Inspired Writings, have been set forth by almost all the Translators of this Series. I have always thought, and am happy to have the support of his latest Editor, Dr. Tholuck, that he I more successful in expounding the EPISTLES OF PAUL than in any other portion of Scripture. This might arise in part from having studied them with uncommon ardor and perseverance. The times in which he lived held out strong inducements to examine the great peculiarities of the Christian Faith. And where were these so likely to be found as in the writings of an Apostle whom the Spirit of God employed, more than all the others, in unfolding to the Church “the unsearchable riches of Christ?” (<490308>Ephesians 3:8.) How far that success might be promoted by the resemblance of character which an able and eloquent writer f1 asserts to have existed between the great Apostle and the Reformer, I leave undetermined. But the chief cause unquestionably lay in his singularly clear perception of that scheme of doctrine which Paul was honored to declare. This enabled him to penetrate the design of the Apostle, and to follow closely the course of his argument. In discussions of the greatest intricacy he seldom loses his way.
    [Show full text]
  • A Correlation of the Roman Canon and the Fourfold Sense of Scripture
    Marquette University e-Publications@Marquette Dissertations, Theses, and Professional Dissertations (1934 -) Projects Lex Orandi, Lex Legendi: A Correlation of the Roman Canon and the Fourfold Sense of Scripture Matthew Thomas Gerlach Marquette University Follow this and additional works at: https://epublications.marquette.edu/dissertations_mu Part of the Religion Commons Recommended Citation Gerlach, Matthew Thomas, "Lex Orandi, Lex Legendi: A Correlation of the Roman Canon and the Fourfold Sense of Scripture" (2011). Dissertations (1934 -). 122. https://epublications.marquette.edu/dissertations_mu/122 LEX ORANDI, LEX LEGENDI : A CORRELATION OF THE ROMAN CANON AND THE FOURFOLD SENSE OF SCRIPTURE by Matthew T. Gerlach, B.A., M.A.T. A Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School, Marquette University, in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Milwaukee, Wisconsin May 2011 ABSTRACT LEX ORANDI , LEX LEGENDI : A CORRELATION OF THE ROMAN CANON AND THE FOURFOLD SENSE OF SCRIPTURE Matthew T. Gerlach, B.A., M.A.T. Marquette University, 2011 While the correlation between the liturgy and the Bible was vital in the patristic- medieval period, a dichotomy grew up between them in modern times. Starting with the assumption that a fuller retrieval of the correlation today requires forms of engaging texts which are not exclusively linear or historico-critical, the dissertation argues that the dichotomy between liturgy and Bible is overcome within a correlation of the Eucharist and spiritual exegesis that retrieves a typological reading of Scripture and that attends to the liturgical relationships memorial, presence, and anticipation. The structure of reading the Bible parallels the structure of praying within the liturgy.
    [Show full text]