DOCSLIB.ORG

Index Locorum

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Index Locorum Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-01377-3 - Libanius: A Critical Introduction Edited by Lieve Van Hoof Index More information Index locorum Declamations, 107–27, 323–30 Declamation 37, 119, 121 Declamation (2), 116, 117, 125 Declamation 38, 114, 127 Declamation (6), 117, 119, 121, 123 Declamation 39, 114, 127 Declamation (12), 114, 116, 120, 123 Declamation 42, 165 Declamation (15), 116 Declamation 44, 119 Declamation (16), 116 Declamation 46, 109, 112, 120, 127, 165 Declamation [18], 115 Declamation 47, 112, 127 Declamation [20], 115 Declamation 48, 112, 113, 127 Declamation [23], 115 Declamation 50, 112 Declamation (24), 116, 121, 127 Declamation 51, 114 Declamation (25), 114, 116, 120 Hypotheses to Demosthenes, 116, 173, 182, Declamation (28), 112 248, 317 Declamation (29), 112 Letters, 144–59, 335–50 Declamation [34], 112, 114, 164 Letter 19, 148, 155 Declamation [40], 114, 120, 123 Letter 25, 44 Declamation [43], 113, 123, 127 Letter 33, 44, 45 Declamation [45], 120, 121 Letter 34, 229 Declamation [49], 114, 127 Letter 35, 44, 45 Declamation 1, 82, 115, 116, 117, 119, 125 Letter 48, 236 Declamation 3, 114, 117, 120, 125, 173 Letter 61, 236 Declamation 4, 117, 119, 120, 125, 164, 279 Letter 75, 272 Declamation 5, 115, 117, 252 Letter 83, 225 Declamation 7, 117, 118 Letter 97, 234 Declamation 8, 117, 118 Letter 114, 236 Declamation 9, 113, 116, 119, 120 Letter 192, 281, 283, 286 Declamation 10, 113, 116, 119, 120 Letter 218, 236 Declamation 11, 116, 164 Letter 219, 236 Declamation 13, 116, 164 Letter 240, 237 Declamation 14, 116 Letter 249, 224 Declamation 17, 115 Letter 252, 229 Declamation 19, 115 Letter 280, 226 Declamation 21, 115 Letter 285, 288 Declamation 22, 115, 120 Letter 298, 225 Declamation 26, 112, 114, 121, 124, 164, 173, 174 Letter 309, 224 Declamation 27, 112, 114, 174 Letter 312, 291 Declamation 30, 112, 114, 121 Letter 316, 286, 288, 290 Declamation 31, 112, 114, 121, 165 Letter 355, 226 Declamation 32, 112, 121 Letter 357, 286 Declamation 33, 112, 113, 114, 119, 121, 165 Letter 362, 237 Declamation 35, 112, 113 Letter 364, 267 Declamation 36, 113, 119, 127 Letter 365, 234, 238 378 © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-01377-3 - Libanius: A Critical Introduction Edited by Lieve Van Hoof Index More information Index locorum 379 Letter 374, 267 Letter 1443, 231 Letter 382, 236 Letter 1459, 238 Letter 388, 44, 46 Letter 1508, 250 Letter 395, 227 Letter 1534, 39, 252 Letter 396, 227 Letters 430-452, 235 Letter 405, 99, 250, 267 Letters 550-559, 235 Letter 411, 287 Orations, 81–106, 331–4 Letter 413, 227 Autobiography (Oration 1), 7–38, 40, 41, 42, 43, Letter 435, 233 44, 49, 50, 59–60, 61, 62, 63, 65, 67, 81, 92, Letter 439, 266 149, 160, 182, 190, 192, 193, 196, 197, 198, Letter 482, 231 200, 236, 239, 243, 244, 245, 246, 249, 252, Letter 490, 236 266, 267, 278, 315, 331 Letter 510, 236 Oration 2, 32, 68, 149, 198, 251 Letter 527, 267 Oration 3, 93, 161, 251, 278 Letter 545, 237 Oration 4, 95, 252 Letter 551, 254 Oration 5, 68, 70, 75, 97, 251, 256–60, 272 Letter 552, 237 Oration 6, 98 Letter 559, 158, 236 Oration 7, 98, 312 Letter 562, 231 Oration 8, 98, 264 Letter 606, 290 Oration 9, 97, 139 Letter 615, 252 Oration 10, 91, 100 Letter 617, 237 Oration 11, 67, 96, 163, 212, 213, 251, 271, 277 Letter 651, 237 Oration 12, 84, 100, 194, 204, 211, 215, 266 Letter 732, 225 Oration 13, 83, 84, 100, 203, 215, 266 Letter 742, 64, 109 Oration 14, 20, 84, 161, 194, 266, 274, 277, 288 Letter 758, 161 Oration 15, 84, 195, 255, 266, 272, 276, 277 Letter 779, 226 Oration 16, 62, 84, 195, 252 Letter 791, 226 Oration 17, 52, 54–5, 84, 164, 173, 196, 260–5, Letter 808, 226 275, 277, 293, 312 Letter 823, 286 Oration 18, 52, 56, 84, 125, 166, 204, 205, 210, Letter 834, 226 215, 229, 231, 255, 263, 293 Letter 839, 147 Oration 19, 85, 101, 104, 201, 277 Letter 840, 147, 149 Oration 20, 85, 104 Letter 910, 250 Oration 21, 85 Letter 914, 146, 147 Oration 22, 70, 85, 104, 263 Letter 915, 146, 147 Oration 23, 83, 85, 102, 104, 105, 201 Letter 982, 274 Oration 24, 83, 86, 100, 201, 206, 275, 293, 312 Letter 1016, 281 Oration 25, 74, 98, 104 Letter 1036, 251, 271, 274 Oration 26, 88, 89, 266 Letter 1048, 57 Oration 27, 89, 266 Letter 1080, 62 Oration 28, 89, 201, 266 Letter 1113, 234, 238 Oration 29, 95, 100, 266 Letter 1120, 280 Oration 30, 86, 201, 207, 212, 295, 299–312, 313 Letter 1142, 234 Oration 31, 70, 90, 101 Letter 1148, 238 Oration 32, 95 Letter 1154, 238 Oration 33, 89, 201, 251 Letter 1220, 53 Oration 34, 75, 94 Letter 1262, 252 Oration 35, 90, 157 Letter 1267, 226 Oration 36, 94 Letter 1277, 229 Oration 37, 96, 251, 257, 258 Letter 1310, 234 Oration 38, 75, 91 Letter 1350, 226 Oration 39, 96 Letter 1424, 51 Oration 40, 89 Letter 1431, 283 Oration 42, 96 Letter 1434, 53 Oration 43, 93, 256 © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-01377-3 - Libanius: A Critical Introduction Edited by Lieve Van Hoof Index More information 380 Index locorum Orations (cont.) Oration 63, 91 Oration 44, 96 Oration 64, 97, 251 Oration 45, 86, 201, 208, 258 Panegyric for Valens, 23, 34, 197 Oration 46, 89, 201 Progymnasmata, 128–43, 318–22 Oration 47, 87, 201, 229, 300 Anecdote (chreia), 128, 132, 133, 141 Oration 48, 91, 216, 229 Common topics (koinos topos), 128, 133–4 Oration 49, 87, 201 Common topics (topoi), 139 Oration 50, 86, 105, 201, 214 Comparison (synkrisis), 128, 136 Oration 51, 87, 88, 201, 207, 239 Confirmation (kataskeuē), 128, 133 Oration 52, 87, 88, 201, 239 Description (ekphrasis), 128, 136–7, 138, 139 Oration 53, 91 Encomium (enkōmion), 128, 135–6 Oration 54, 90 Fable (mythos), 128, 131–2 Oration 55, 65, 93 Introduction of a law (eisphora tou nomou), Oration 56, 90 128, 138 Oration 57, 90 Invective (psogos), 128, 135–6 Oration 58, 93 Maxim (gnōmē), 128, 132–3 Oration 59, 87, 100, 104, 190, 203, Narration (diēgēma), 128, 132 215, 255 Refutation (anaskeuē), 128, 133 Oration 60, 98, 251 Speech in character (ēthopoiia), 117, 120, 128, Oration 61, 41, 47, 48, 54, 98, 251 136, 138 Oration 62, 23, 94, 223, 272 Thesis (thesis), 128, 137–8, 140 © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-01377-3 - Libanius: A Critical Introduction Edited by Lieve Van Hoof Index More information General index Except in the cases of famous people such as emperors or writers, the names of late antique people are followed by two numbers, separated by a slash: Arabic numbers refer to their numbering in the PLRE, Roman numerals to that in Seeck (1906). A hyphen (-) indicates that the person has no number in the relevant prosopography, as he is the only person with that name included in it; a zero (0) indicates that a person is not mentioned in a prosopography. Acacius 7/iii, 288, 290 Anatolius 5/iv, 239 Acacius 8/i, 225, 226 Anaxentius 0/0, 65, 93 Achilles, 115, 117, 126, 133, 135, 136, 140, 141, 143, Andromache, 136 227, 252, 260, 263, 264 Andronicus 3/ii, 233, 286 Achilles Tatius, 259 Ankara, 226, 234, 235 Actaeon, 258 Antenor, 164 Aelian, 248 Anthius 0/-, 227 Aelius Aristides, 39, 47, 56, 76, 96, 97, 107, 115, Antioch, 83, 89, 93, 96, 102, 145, 178, 179, 180, 189, 155, 246, 248, 251, 252, 253, 256, 257, 258, 196, 201, 204, 212, 213, 214, 217, 223, 226, 259, 260, 261, 263, 265, 267, 272 228, 233, 234, 235, 253, 254, 277, 295, 312 Aelius Aristides, pseudo-, 261 Council, 70, 82, 90, 139, 216, 229 Aeneas, 258 Emperors in, 16, 23, 25, 27, 48, 55, 84, 192, 193, Aeneas Tacticus, 261 194, 195, 196, 197 Aeschines, 66, 95, 110, 115, 135, 136, 246, 250, Governors, 82, 88, 106, 199, 200 261, 267 Libanius, 7, 14, 16, 18, 19, 32, 51, 61, 69, 76, 103, Aeschylus, 246, 247, 249, 262, 265, 266 146, 153, 168, 169, 190, 191, 193, 220, 225, Aesop, 246, 247 235, 236, 239, 243, 244 Aesticampianus, Johannes, 172 Schools, 44, 63, 64, 65, 168, 223 Aetherius 1/0, 27 Antiochus 0/0, 95 Agamemnon, 141, 211, 236, 260, 263, 264 Antiochus 9/x, 96 Ajax of Locris, 133, 142 Antiphon, 261 Ajax, son of Telamon, 136, 256, 264 Anytus, 116 Alcaeus, 247 Apellio -/-, 227 Alcibiades, 116 Aphrodite, 142, 257, 263 Alciphron, 248 Aphthonius, 129, 130, 131, 132, 133, 134, 135, 136, 137 Alexander the Great, 97, 139, 211, 262, 264 Apollo, 48, 49, 64, 132, 133, 142, 194, 258, 263, 264 Alexandria, 305 Apollodorus, 257 Ammianus Marcellinus, 24, 27, 42, 43, 215, Apollonius Rhodius, 257, 259 230, 235 Arabia, 215, 233 Amphilochius of Iconium, pseudo-, 168, 169, 174 Aratus, 246, 247, 257, 259 Amphitryon, 258 Araxius -/-, 231 Anacreon, 247 Arcadius, 200 Anatolia, 62 Archidamus, 116, 121 Anatolius 3/i, 148, 156, 192, 230, 237 Archilochus, 247 Anatolius 4/ii, 225 Ares, 117, 118, 263 381 © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-01377-3 - Libanius: A Critical Introduction Edited by Lieve Van Hoof Index More information 382 General index Arethusa, 132 Cassandra, 133, 142 Arion, 132 Cassius Dio, 261 Aristaenetus 1/i, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 98, 267 Celsus 3/i, 238 Aristides, 258, 352, 356, 357, 363 Cephalus of Colyttus, 116 Aristophanes, 244, 246, 247, 249, 262, 266, 267 Chaeronea, 115 Aristophanes -/- of Corinth, 20, 84, 161, 194, 274, Characterization, 15, 31, 123, 124 275, 276, 286 Charis, 152, 231 Aristophon of Azenia, 116 Chierigato, Lionello, 173 Aristotle, 156, 248 Chiron, 136 Armenia, 223, 224, 226, 233 Choricius of Gaza, 107, 124, 131, 164, 173 Arrian, 261 Christianity, 3, 168, 180, 189, 195, 202, 205, 206, Artemis, 97, 251, 256, 257, 258, 259, 260
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Philological and Historical Commentary on Ammianus Marcellinus XXVI
    Philological and Historical Commentary on Ammianus Marcellinus XXVI Philological and Historical Commentary on Ammianus Marcellinus XXVI By J. den Boeft, J.W. Drijvers, D. den Hengst and H.C. Teitler LEIDEN • BOSTON 2008 This book is printed on acid-free paper. A Cataloging-in-Publication record for this book is available from the Library of Congress. ISBN: 978 90 04 16212 9 Copyright 2008 by Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands. Koninklijke Brill NV incorporates the imprints Brill, Hotei Publishing, IDC Publishers, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers and VSP. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, translated, stored in aretrievalsystem,ortransmittedinanyformorbyanymeans,electronic,mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior written permission from the publisher. Authorization to photocopy items for internal or personal use is granted by Koninklijke Brill NV provided that the appropriate fees are paid directly to The Copyright Clearance Center, 222 Rosewood Drive, Suite 910, Danvers, MA 01923, USA. Fees are subject to change. printed in the netherlands CONTENTS Preface ................................. vii Introduction ........................... ix A noteonchronology ................. xv Legenda ................................ xxvii Commentary on Chapter 1 ........... 1 Commentary on Chapter 2 ........... 37 Commentary on Chapter 3 ........... 59 Commentary on Chapter 4 ........... 75 Commentary on Chapter 5 ........... 93 Commentary on Chapter 6 ........... 125 Commentary on Chapter 7
    [Show full text]
  • INTRODUCTION in the Late Fourth Century, Athens Came Under The
    INTRODUCTION In the late fourth century, Athens came under the spell of one of the more colourful and complex fi gures of her history: Demetrius of Phalerum. A dilettante who bleached his hair and rouged his cheeks, a man whose luxurious banquets were conducted in perfumed and mosaic-clad rooms, Demetrius was also a product of Aristotle’s philo- sophical establishment, the Peripatos, and a remarkably accomplished scholar in his own right. Th is erudite and urbane fi gure rose from political obscurity to rule his native city for the decade 317–307. His regime occupies a vital transitional period of Athenian history. In temporal terms, it provides the link between the classical Athens of Lycurgus and the emerging Hellenistic city of the third century. It was a time at which Athens was still held fi rmly under the suzerainty of Macedon, the dominant world power of the day, as it had been already for three decades, but the very nature of that suzerainty was being re-defi ned. For much of the previous three decades, Athens had been but one of numerous Greek states subordinated to the northern super-power by a web of treaties called the League of Corinth. By the time of Demetrius, both Philip and Alexander, the greatest of the Macedonian kings, were gone and the Macedonian world itself was fragmenting. Alexander’s subordi- nates—the so-called Diadochoi—were seeking to carve out kingdoms for themselves in Alexander’s erstwhile empire, and in the resulting confusion, individual Greek states were increasingly becoming infl u- ential agents and valued prizes in the internecine strife between war- ring Macedonian generals.
    [Show full text]
  • Aelius Aristides , Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies, 27:3 (1986:Autumn) P.279
    BLOIS, LUKAS DE, The "Eis Basilea" [Greek] of Ps.-Aelius Aristides , Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies, 27:3 (1986:Autumn) p.279 The Ei~ BauLAea of Ps.-Aelius Aristides Lukas de Blois HE AUTHENTICITY of a speech preserved under the title El~ Ba­ T utAia in most MSS. of Aelius Aristides (Or. 35K.) has long been questioned.1 It will be argued here that the speech is a basilikos logos written by an unknown author of the mid-third century in accordance with precepts that can be found in the extant rhetorical manuals of the later Empire. Although I accept the view that the oration was written in imitation of Xenophon's Agesilaus and Isoc­ rates' Evagoras, and was clearly influenced by the speeches of Dio Chrysostom on kingship and Aristides' panegyric on Rome,2 I offer support for the view that the El~ BautAia is a panegyric addressed to a specific emperor, probably Philip the Arab, and contains a political message relevant to a specific historical situation. After a traditional opening (§ § 1-4), the author gives a compar­ atively full account of his addressee's recent accession to the throne (5-14). He praises the emperor, who attained power unexpectedly while campaigning on the eastern frontier, for doing so without strife and bloodshed, and for leading the army out of a critical situation back to his own territory. The author mentions in passing the em­ peror's education (1lf) and refers to an important post he filled just before his enthronement-a post that gave him power, prepared him for rule, and gave him an opportunity to correct wrongs (5, 13).
    [Show full text]
  • The Rhetoric of Corruption in Late Antiquity
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE The Rhetoric of Corruption in Late Antiquity A Dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Classics by Tim W. Watson June 2010 Dissertation Committee: Dr. Michele R. Salzman, Chairperson Dr. Harold A. Drake Dr. Thomas N. Sizgorich Copyright by Tim W. Watson 2010 The Dissertation of Tim W. Watson is approved: ________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________ Committee Chairperson University of California, Riverside ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS In accordance with that filial piety so central to the epistolary persona of Q. Aurelius Symmachus, I would like to thank first and foremost my parents, Lee and Virginia Watson, without whom there would be quite literally nothing, followed closely by my grandmother, Virginia Galbraith, whose support both emotionally and financially has been invaluable. Within the academy, my greatest debt is naturally to my advisor, Michele Salzman, a doctissima patrona of infinite patience and firm guidance, to whom I came with the mind of a child and departed with the intellect of an adult. Hal Drake I owe for his kind words, his critical eye, and his welcome humor. In Tom Sizgorich I found a friend and colleague whose friendship did not diminish even after he assumed his additional role as mentor. Outside the field, I owe a special debt to Dale Kent, who ushered me through my beginning quarter of graduate school with great encouragement and first stirred my fascination with patronage. Lastly, I would like to express my gratitude to the two organizations who have funded the years of my study, the Department of History at the University of California, Riverside and the Department of Classics at the University of California, Irvine.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Date of the Trial of Anaxagoras
    The Classical Quarterly http://journals.cambridge.org/CAQ Additional services for The Classical Quarterly: Email alerts: Click here Subscriptions: Click here Commercial reprints: Click here Terms of use : Click here On the Date of the Trial of Anaxagoras A. E. Taylor The Classical Quarterly / Volume 11 / Issue 02 / April 1917, pp 81 - 87 DOI: 10.1017/S0009838800013094, Published online: 11 February 2009 Link to this article: http://journals.cambridge.org/abstract_S0009838800013094 How to cite this article: A. E. Taylor (1917). On the Date of the Trial of Anaxagoras. The Classical Quarterly, 11, pp 81-87 doi:10.1017/S0009838800013094 Request Permissions : Click here Downloaded from http://journals.cambridge.org/CAQ, IP address: 128.122.253.212 on 28 Apr 2015 ON THE DATE OF THE TRIAL OF ANAXAGORAS. IT is a point of some interest to the historian of the social and intellectual development of Athens to determine, if possible, the exact dates between which the philosopher Anaxagoras made that city his home. As everyone knows, the tradition of the third and later centuries was not uniform. The dates from which the Alexandrian chronologists had to arrive at their results may be conveniently summed up under three headings, (a) date of Anaxagoras' arrival at Athens, (6) date of his prosecution and escape to Lampsacus, (c) length of his residence at Athens, (a) The received account (Diogenes Laertius ii. 7),1 was that Anaxagoras was twenty years old at the date of the invasion of Xerxes and lived to be seventy-two. This was apparently why Apollodorus (ib.) placed his birth in Olympiad 70 and his death in Ol.
    [Show full text]
  • Pilgrimage in Graeco-Roman & Early Christian Antiquity : Seeing the Gods
    9 Pilgrimage as Elite Habitus: Educated Pilgrims in Sacred Landscape During the Second Sophistic Marco Galli A Rita Zanotto Galli, con profonda amicizia e stima PATTERNS OF RELIGIOUS MEMORY AND PAIDEIA DURING THE SECOND SOPHISTIC Is it possible to reconstruct, at least in part, the suggestive and intricate frame that connected the monuments and images, the ritual actions, and the pilgrim who actively and subjectively participated as collector and observer of sacred experience? What indices permit us to trace the emotional reactions of pilgrims in contact with the sacred landscape? What mental processes and emotional reactions made the tangible objects (the monuments, the images, and the rites) into mental objects, and how did these become Wxed in the memory of the pilgrim? With these questions as guidelines, I shall argue that we can apply a contem- porary approach to the investigation of the social functions of ancient pilgrimage. For the exploration of the relationship between the religious experiences of the pilgrim and social instances of collective memory for the reconstruction and reactivation of a sacred traditional landscape, we may turn to a moment in history that provides an unusually dense 254 Marco Galli representation of the internal states of sacred experience.1 This is the period dubbed ‘The Second Sophistic’. It was a period virtually obsessed with the problem of memory, when even religious tradition, because it formed one of the most signiWcant communicative functions of collect- ive life, was subjected to fundamental revision within the process of social memory.2 Plutarch’s writings cast light on the role of memory and its interaction with religious tradition.
    [Show full text]
  • Aelius Aristides As Orator-Confessor: Embodied Ethos in Second Century Healing Cults
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Masters Theses Graduate School 8-2019 Aelius Aristides as Orator-Confessor: Embodied Ethos in Second Century Healing Cults Josie Rose Portz University of Tennessee, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes Recommended Citation Portz, Josie Rose, "Aelius Aristides as Orator-Confessor: Embodied Ethos in Second Century Healing Cults. " Master's Thesis, University of Tennessee, 2019. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes/5509 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Josie Rose Portz entitled "Aelius Aristides as Orator-Confessor: Embodied Ethos in Second Century Healing Cults." I have examined the final electronic copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree of Master of Arts, with a major in English. Janet Atwill, Major Professor We have read this thesis and recommend its acceptance: Jeffrey Ringer, Tanita Saenkhum Accepted for the Council: Dixie L. Thompson Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School (Original signatures are on file with official studentecor r ds.) AELIUS ARISTIDES AS ORATOR-CONFESSOR: EMBODIED ETHOS IN SECOND CENTURY HEALING CULTS A Thesis Presented for the Master of Arts Degree The University of Tennessee, Knoxville Josie Rose Portz August 2019 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS To my wonderful committee who has supported me these past two years in furthering my education in rhetorical studies, many thanks.
    [Show full text]
  • Graeca Tergestina Storia E Civiltà 5 Graeca Tergestina Storia E Civiltà
    GRAECA TERGESTINA STORIA E CIVILTÀ 5 GRAECA TERGESTINA STORIA E CIVILTÀ Studi di Storia greca coordinati da Michele Faraguna Opera sottoposta a peer review secondo il protocollo UPI – University Press Italiane impaginazione Gabriella Clabot © copyright Edizioni Università di Trieste, Trieste 2018. Questo volume è integralmente disponibile online a libero accesso nell’archivio digitale OpenstarTs, al link: Proprietà letteraria riservata. https://www.openstarts.units.it/handle/10077/8648 I diritti di traduzione, memorizzazione elettronica, di riproduzione e di adattamento totale e parziale di questa pubblicazione, con qualsiasi mezzo (compresi i microfilm, le fotocopie e altro) sono riservati per tutti i paesi. ISBN 978-88-8303-922-5 (print) ISBN 978-88-8303-923-2 (online) EUT Edizioni Università di Trieste via Weiss 21, 34128 Trieste http://eut.units.it https://www.facebook.com/EUTEdizioniUniversitaTrieste Eubulo e i Poroi di Senofonte LʼAtene del IV secolo tra riflessione teorica e pratica politica Livia De Martinis EUT EDIZIONI UNIVERSITÀ DI TRIESTE A mia madre Indice Abbreviazioni IX Premessa XIII Introduzione 1 Capitolo I – Eubulo: ricostruzione biografica (400/399 a.C. ca. – ante 330 a.C.) 5 1. L’uomo 7 1.1. I dati anagrafici 7 1.2. La carica arcontale 9 2. Gli inizi dell’attività politica 10 2.1. Il decreto per il ritorno di Senofonte e l’appartenenza alla cerchia di Callistrato 10 2.2. Gli esordi in politica internazionale 13 2.3. L’attivismo diplomatico e la rinuncia a una politica militare attiva 15 2.4. La pace di Filocrate 20 3. L’apice dell’attività economico-amministrativa 21 3.1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Regime of Demetrius of Phalerum in Athens, 317–307
    Th e Regime of Demetrius of Phalerum in Athens, 317–307 BCE Mnemosyne Supplements History and Archaeology of Classical Antiquity Edited by Susan E. Alcock, Brown University Th omas Harrison, Liverpool Willem M. Jongman, Groningen H.S. Versnel, Leiden VOLUME 318 Th e Regime of Demetrius of Phalerum in Athens, 317–307 BCE A Philosopher in Politics By Lara O’Sullivan LEIDEN • BOSTON 2009 On the cover: Detail of the Parthenon. Photo: Author. Th is book is printed on acid-free paper. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data O’Sullivan, Lara. Th e rule of Demetrius of Phalerum in Athens, 317-307 B.C. : a philosopher in politics / by Lara O’Sullivan. p. cm. — (Mnemosyne supplements. History and archaeology of classical antiquity, ISSN 0169-8958 ; v. 318) Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-90-04-17888-5 (hbk. : alk. paper) 1. Demetrius, of Phaleron, b. ca. 350 B.C. 2. Demetrius, of Phaleron, b. ca. 350 B.C.—Political and social views. 3. Governors—Greece—Athens—Biography. 4. Statesmen—Greece—Athens— Biography. 5. Orators—Greece—Athens—Biography. 6. Philosophers, Ancient— Biography. 7. Athens (Greece)—Politics and government. 8. Philosophy, Ancient. 9. Athens (Greece)—Relations—Macedonia. 10. Macedonia—Relations—Greece— Athens. I. Title. II. Series. DF235.48.D455O87 2009 938’.508092—dc22 [B] 2009033560 ISSN 0169-8958 ISBN 978 90 04 17888 5 Copyright 2009 by Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, Th e Netherlands. Koninklijke Brill NV incorporates the imprints Brill, Hotei Publishing, IDC Publishers, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers and VSP. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, translated, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior written permission from the publisher.
    [Show full text]
  • Anaxagoras Janko Revised 2020
    The Eclipse that brought the Plague: Themistocles, Pericles, Anaxagoras, and the Athenians’ War on Science• Abstract: The biography of Anaxagoras (500–428 BCE), the most brilliant scientist of antiquity, contains many unresolved contradictions, which are best explained as follows. After he ‘predicted’ the fall of the meteorite at Aegospotami in 466, he lived nearby at Lampsacus as the protégé of its ruler Themistocles. In 460 Pericles became his patron at Athens, where he lived for the next thirty years. In 431, Pericles was taking part in an expedition to the Peloponnese when the sun was eclipsed; he tried to dispel his helmsman’s fear by covering his face with his cloak, illustrating Anaxagoras’ correct account of eclipses. In 430 he led a second such expedition, which failed badly; its return coincided with the plague. The seer Diopeithes brought in a decree that targeted the ‘atheist’ Anaxagoras by banning astronomy. This enabled Thucydides son of Melesias and Cleon to attack Pericles by prosecuting Anaxagoras, on the ground that Pericles’ impiety had angered the gods, thereby causing the plague. Pericles sent Anaxagoras back to Lampsacus, where he soon died; he was himself deposed and fined, in a first triumph for the Athenian populist reaction against the fifth-century Enlightenment. The most striking evidence of the reaction against the Enlightenment is to be seen in the successful prosecutions of intellectuals on religious grounds which took place in Athens in the last third of the fifth century. About 432 B.C. or a year or two later, disbelief in the supernatural and the teaching of astronomy were made indictable offences.
    [Show full text]
  • ATINER's Conference Paper Proceedings Series LIT2017-0021
    ATINER CONFERENCE PRESENTATION SERIES No: LIT2017-0021 ATINER’s Conference Paper Proceedings Series LIT2017-0021 Athens, 22 August 2017 Themistocles' Hetairai in a Fragment of Idomeneus of Lampsacus: A Small Commentary Marina Pelluci Duarte Mortoza Athens Institute for Education and Research 8 Valaoritou Street, Kolonaki, 10683 Athens, Greece ATINER’s conference paper proceedings series are circulated to promote dialogue among academic scholars. All papers of this series have been blind reviewed and accepted for presentation at one of ATINER’s annual conferences according to its acceptance policies (http://www.atiner.gr/acceptance). © All rights reserved by authors. 1 ATINER CONFERENCE PRESENTATION SERIES No: LIT2017-0021 ATINER’s Conference Paper Proceedings Series LIT2017-0021 Athens, 24 August 2017 ISSN: 2529-167X Marina Pelluci Duarte Mortoza, Independent Researcher, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Brazil Themistocles' Hetairai in a Fragment of Idomeneus of Lampsacus: A Small Commentary1 ABSTRACT This paper aims to be a small commentary on a fragment cited by Athenaeus of Naucratis (2nd-3rd AD) in his Deipnosophistai. This is his only surviving work, which was composed in 15 books, and verses on many different subjects. It is an enormous amount of information of all kinds, mostly linked to dining, but also on music, dance, games, and all sorts of activities. On Book 13, Athenaeus puts the guests of the banquet talking about erotic matters, and one of them cites this fragment in which Idomeneus of Lampsacus (ca. 325-270 BCE) talks about the entrance of the great Themistocles in the Agora of Athens: in a car full of hetairai. Not much is known about Idomeneus, only that he wrote books on historical and philosophical matters, and that nothing he wrote survived.
    [Show full text]
  • The Hadrianic Chancellery
    CHAPTER 5 Governing by Dispatching Letters: The Hadrianic Chancellery Juan Manuel Cortés-Copete In the year 142 AD, Aelius Aristides was a young sophist fulfilling his dream of making an appearance in Rome to declaim before senators and, even, the emperor himself. He wished this trip would be the start of a triumphal politi- cal activity under the auspices of one of his teachers, Herodes Atticus, friend of emperors and appointed consul at Rome within that year. Illness and mys- ticism thwarted his political vocation, but never hindering the opportunity to present in public his speech Regarding Rome.1 The encomium to the city that dominated the world was composed of two series of comparisons: the superiority of Roman domination against Greek hegemonies, brief in time and space; and the kindliness of the Empire in contrast with the kingdoms that had previously tried to subdue the world.2 After indicating the flaws of the Persian Empire, the limitations of the reign of Alexander, and the failures of Hellenistic kingdoms, the sophist praised the Roman Empire. The authentic control over the ecumene by Rome and the perfection of its political structure were its arguments. This section concluded as follows (26.33): Therefore there is no need for him [the Emperor] to wear himself out by journeying over the whole empire, nor by visiting different people at different times to confirm individual matters, whenever he enters their land. But it is very easy for him to govern the whole inhabited world by dispatching letters without moving from the spot. And the letters * This article is part of the Project “Adriano y la integración de la diversidad regional” (HAR2015- 65451-C2-1-P MINECO/FEDER), financed by the Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad, Government of Spain.
    [Show full text]